Salinas Valley Post Acute
637 East Romie Lane, Salinas, CA 93901 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (831) 424-0687 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.4% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.6% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.3% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 4.5% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.3% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.7% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.0% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.61 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.64 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
41.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 186 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 83.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 41.6%CMS range 34.6–49.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.9%CMS range 8.9–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 83.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 77.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 70.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.7%CMS range 5.9–13.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.28 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 95.7 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.11 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control and prevention practices when:1. Staff did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE, clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments, e.g., gloves, mask, gown) when caring for a resident on enhanced-barrier precautions (an infection control practice used to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms); 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) M used the same paper tissue to wipe excess liquid from both eyes during the administration of eye medications for Resident 74; 3. Staff did not perform hand hygiene between contaminated (exposed to body fluids or potentially infectious material) and clean tasks during wound treatment;4. Unlabeled resident's care items;5.Unlabeled oxygen (O2, colorless, odorless, and tasteless gas essential for life) nasal cannula (NC, a flexible plastic tube used to deliver O2 directly into the nostrils)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assessments and services which meet professional standards of quality for 11 of 21 sampled residents (Residents 92, 52, 83, 1, 72, 73, 7, 8, 91, 47, and 9) when the following were observed: 1.Inaccurate bed rail (metal or rigid plastic and adjustable safety bars attached to the sides of the bed) and entrapment risk observation/assessments for Resident 72, 52, 1, and 83; 2.Inaccurate bed rail and entrapment risk observation/assessments for Resident 73, 7, 8, 91, 47, and 9; 3.Treatment nurse C (TN C) applied zinc oxide (topical skin barrier) to wound without a physician's order for Resident 92.These failures had the potential to compromise the health and safety of above sampled residents. Findings: 1.During room rounds on 2/9/2026 at 11:03 a.m., observed Resident 72 was in bed with two partial bed rails or side rails (BR, SR, metal or hard plastic adjustable devices attached to the sides of a bed frame for safety or to assist with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff covered facial hair while working over exposed food in the kitchen. This deficient practice placed 95 residents at risk for receiving contaminated food in the facility. Findings: During an observation of the meal tray line on 2/11/26 at approximately 11:35 a.m., the dietary aide N (DA N) and dietary cook M (DC M ) were observed with visible facial hair and were not wearing beard restraints while working over exposed food in kitchen. Dietary staff were plating and checking meal trays while standing over exposed food items during tray line service. During an interview on 2/11/26 at 2:30 p.m., DA N stated that during tray line he was only checking the food and not handling it. During an interview on 2/11/26 at 2:40 p.m., DC M stated that his beard was long and that he needed to wear a beard restraint. During an interview on 2/11/26 at 2:45 p.m., the Registered Dietitian (RD) stated that when working in direct food preparation or plating food, staff should wear hair and beard nets. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure free from loss of personal property for one (Resident 6) of three sampled residents. This failure had the potential to affect the health and emotional well-being of sampled Resident 6.Findings:During room rounds for Resident 6 on 2/10/2026 at 8:38 a.m., Resident 6 informed facility lost his clothes and shoes and he informed facility staff. Resident 6 also stated no staff responded back to him for his missing items.Review of Resident 6's face sheet (FS, a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 6 was admitted to facility on 12/26/2025.Review of document for Resident 6's inventory of personal effects (record of personal belongings, clothing and valuables brought into the facility) undated, indicated several items including clothes, shoes and slippers. Review of facility's list of grievance and theft/ lost logs for December 2025, January 2026 and February 2026 indicated no documented evidence of lost personal clothes and shoes for Resident 6.During an interview with certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of four residents (Resident 9) is free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medication when: Resident 9's Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication that helps treat several kinds of mental health conditions) ordered as needed with no stop date. This failure had the potential for increased risks associated with use of psychotropic medication that could negatively affect the resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.During a review of Resident 9's clinical record indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including depression (loss of pleasure or interest in activities for long periods of time),unspecified and anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions that cause fear, dread and other symptoms that are out of proportion to the situation),unspecified.During a review of Resident 9's physician's order indicated an order for Seroquel Oral Tablet 25 MG (milligram, unit of measure) Give 1 tablet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to code minimum data set (MDS, resident assessment tool) assessment accurately to reflect status of the residents for three of six sampled residents (Resident 6, 49, and 1) when; 1.Resident 6's dental status was coded inaccurately;2. Resident 6's weight loss status was coded inaccurately;3.Resident 49's dental status was coded inaccurately;4.Resident 1's orders for insulin (medication used to treat and regulate blood sugar) was coded inaccurately. These failures can lead to inappropriate care and interventions for sampled residents.Findings: 1.Review of Resident 6's face sheet (FS, a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 6 was admitted to facility on 12/26/2025.Review of Resident 6's admission and readmission evaluation dated 12/26/2025 indicated Resident 6 had his own and broken teeth.Review of Resident 6's readmission evaluation dated 1/9/2026 indicated broken natural teeth.Review of Resident 6's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a screening for mental illness and treatment to ensure the facility coordinates with the appropriate State-designated authority to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs) screening form for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 84). This failure had the potential to result in the resident not receiving specialized care and services appropriate to the condition. Findings: Review of Resident 84's clinical record indicated diagnoses that included Paranoid Schizophrenia (a severe mental illness characterized by persistent false beliefs and hallucinations that affect thinking, perception, and behavior) and psychosis (loss of contact with reality, often involving hallucinations or false beliefs). Review of the PASARR Level 1 screening form dated 2015, indicated incomplete information. During concurrent interview and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement person centered comprehensive care plans that included target symptoms, measurable objectives, and interventions for four out of 21 sampled residents (Resident 47, Resident 6, Resident 49, and Resident 72) when: 1.Resident 47, the facility did not develop care plan for bipolar disorder (mental disorder characterized by periods of elevated mood and depression, often with poor decision-making);2.Resident 49, facility did not develop care plan for missing/broken teeth; and3.Resident 6, facility did not develop care plan for edentulous (no natural teeth);4.Resident 72, facility did not develop care plan for use of oxygen therapy. These failures had the potential for above sampled residents not meeting their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial plan of care needs. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 47's clinical record, it indicated Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which includes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to updated and revised comprehensive person-centered care plans for 3 of 21 sample residents (Resident 9, 25 and 88) when;1. Care plans was not revised or updated after the fall for Resident 9;2. Care plan was not revised or updated after the fall for Resident 25;3.Care plan for smoking not revised or updated for non-compliance with smoking for Resident 88.This failure had the potential to result in not meeting sampled Residents 9, 25 and 88's plan of care needs.Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 9's clinical record indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including depression (loss of pleasure or interest in activities for long periods of time) and anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions that cause fear, dread and other symptoms that are out of proportion to the situation). Review of Resident 9's care plan Falls: indicated Resident is at risk for falls with or without injury related to history of falls…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure to follow policy and procedure for electrical and smoking safety for two of six sampled residents (Resident 52 and 88) and in room one out of eleven sampled room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) when;1.Observed long cell phone charging cord on floor while charging in room [ROOM NUMBER].Observed ungraded (not certified for safe use in healthcare setting) power strip (an electrical device to be powered from a single plug in electric socket with many electrical devices to charge at same time) in Resident 52's bed;3.Observed cigarette lighter with Resident 88.Above failures had the potential for accidental hazard for fire for above sampled residents, risk for tripping and fall with or without injury for residents and staff in room [ROOM NUMBER].Findings:1.During an initial room rounds in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 2/9/2026 at 11:10 a.m., observed long cell phone cord one end plugged in electric socket on the wall opposite to bed A and B, on the floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage and labeling of medications for one of two medication carts (a mobile, secured, and organized cart to store, transport and administer medications to residents) (Medication Cart AA), when expired bottle of brimonidine eyedrop (used primarily as eye drops to lower high pressure in the eye caused by open-angle glaucoma [group of eye diseases that can cause vision loss and blindness]) or ocular hypertension (high pressure inside your eye) and latanoprost eyedrop (used to treat glaucoma) medications were not removed from medication cart's active stock. These failures had the potential for residents to receive medications with reduced efficacy. During an inspection of Medication Cart AA on 2/9/26 at 10:23 a.m., with Registered Nurse I (RN I), RN I confirmed the following findings: a. A bottle of Brimonidine eyedrop had an open date of 1/7/26. Upon reviewing with RN I, he confirmed it expired on 2/6/26. b. A bottle of latanoprost eyedrop had an open date of 12/27/25. Upon reviewing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer the influenza (flu, respiratory infection) vaccine timely for one of five sampled residents (Resident 4). This failure had the potential to negatively affect the resident's health and well-being.Review of Resident 4's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 4's Immunization Audit Report indicated there was no documentation that the resident received or was offered the flu vaccine in 2025. During an interview on 2/12/26 at 12:32 p.m., the infection preventionist (IP) confirmed Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in March 2025. The IP stated Resident 4 was offered and recieved the flu vaccine on 2/11/26. The IP stated she was not sure why yesterday was the only time Resident 4 was offered the flu vaccine. Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall management was implemented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Resident 1 was not monitored after 5 falls;2. No interdisciplinary team meeting was conducted after 3 falls;3. No care plan was developed after one fall; and4. Resident 1's Responsible Party was not notified after 2 falls. These failures had the potential for Resident 1 to develop ill effects from a fall, to result in future falls and injury, and for Resident 1's responsible party being uninformed and unaware of his condition.A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including unspecified fall, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and cellulitis (bacterial infection of the skin) of the left lower limb. A review of Resident 1's admission Fall Risk Observation/Assessment, dated 3/12/25, indicated his fall risk score was 16 which indicated a high risk for falls. Review of Resident 1's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to develop care plans and implement interventions to meet the resident's needs. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including hemiplegia/hemiparesis (one side of the body is paralyzed or weak), difficulty in walking, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident 1's Change in Condition Evaluation, dated 8/22/24, indicated Resident 1 had an unwitnessed fall. Resident 1's MDS, dated [DATE], was reviewed. Section J1800 of the MDS was designated to indicate if the resident had any falls during the specified time frame. The individual who completed the MDS coded 0, which indicated the resident did not have any falls during the specified time frame. During an interview and concurrent record review with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for an advance directive (AD: a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney [a document that authorizes to act on behalf of resident] for healthcare when the individual is incapacitated) and completion of physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST: a document that specifies the medical treatments the resident wants to receive during serious illness) form for 9 of 9 sampled residents (Residents 39, 37, 92, 43, 11, 85, 58, 91, and 78). These failures could lead to the delivery of unnecessary or inappropriate medical services against sampled resident's goals and wishes. Findings: Review of Resident 39's face sheet (FS: a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 39 was admitted to facility on 7/3/2018. Review of Resident 39's POLST form dated 7/3/2018 indicated, section D for AD documented No Advance Directive. Further review of Resident 39's clinical record indicated there was no documented evidence for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper use of side rails for six (Residents 303, 304, 91, 44, 75, and 12) of 30 residents when: 1. For Residents 303 and 304, there were no signed informed consents for the use of side rails by the resident or the responsible party for either resident. 2. For Resident 91, the informed consent on file was missing a signature from the resident or responsible party. 3. For Residents 44, 75 and 12, there were no care plans for the use of side rails for any of the three residents These failures had the potential to compromise the resident's rights to fully make informed decisions on the use of side rails, and had the potential to put residents at risk for entrapment or serious injury. Findings: 1. During an observation on 9/16/24 at 10:11 AM, Resident 303 was observed lying in bed, with two siderails up in the upright position. Review of Resident 303's facesheet indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe use and disposition of medications, and accurate accountability of controlled drugs (those with high potential for abuse and addiction), when: 1. There were discrepancies between the controlled drug record (CDR, an inventory/accountability sheet) and the medication administration record (MAR) for 2 out of 4 residents (Residents 34 and 83). The failure had the potential for abuse or misuse of controlled drugs; 2. The pharmacy failed to label 3 insulin pens in accordance with the current standards of practice to prevent mix-ups or administration errors; and 3. There was no process in place for the disposition of hazardous drugs (HDs, medications capable of toxic effects on humans) in accordance with the current standards of practice (See United States Pharmacopeia 800 or USP 800, a scientific non-profit organization that sets standards for safe handling of HDs to minimize the risk of exposure to healthcare personnel, patients, and the environment). This deficiency had the potential for exposing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist (CP) identified irregularities and make recommendations to the facility during the monthly medication regimen review (MRR) for 4 of 23 sampled residents (Residents 72, 40, 44 and 2). This failure had the potential for unsafe medication use and/or residents not achieving highest therapeutic outcomes. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 72's medical record indicated he was an elderly resident admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia (progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movement), unspecified dementia (a condition characterized by memory loss) unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, unspecified psychosis (condition that affect the mind, where there has been some loss of contact with reality), depression unspecified and anxiety disorder, unspecified. A review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 23 sampled residents (Residents 72 and 91) were free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications when: 1. Resident 72 received pimavanserin (an antipsychotic medication to treat hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis) without specific target behaviors, side effect monitoring, quarterly psychotropic review, care plan, and evidence of informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) for over 8 months. Also, Resident 72 did not receive periodic monitoring of the blood lipids while being on Seroquel (antipsychotic medication) that would affect the blood lipids). 2. Resident 91 received Remeron (anti-depressant medication) without monitoring for potential side effects of the medication. The failures resulted in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 11.11% when four (5) medication errors occurred out of 45 opportunities during the medication administration for four out of nine residents (Resident 3, 38, 45, and 78). The deficient practice resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders and/or manufacturer's specifications, which resulted in residents not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medications and may cause preventable side effects for the residents. Findings: 1. During the medication pass observation on 9/16/24 at 9:15 a.m., registered nurse (RN) A was observed preparing and administering 6 medications to Resident 45. The medications included 1 tablet of calcium acetate (a phosphate binder, medication to control high blood levels of phosphorus, a mineral found in food, in people with kidney disease who are on dialysis) 667 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) and 1 tablet of carvedilol (medication to control high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage as per facility's policy and procedures (P&P) and/or manufacturer's specifications, and expired medications were removed from active stock. Inspection of two of two medication refrigerators and three of four medication carts identified: 1. Four medications were not stored as in accordance with the manufacturer's guidance, and a discontinued medication for a resident was not discarded to prevent medication errors; 2. An insulin pen without visible resident's name on it. This had potential for it to be given to the wrong resident; and 3. One opened inhaler and four eye drop medications did not have an open date; and eight eye medications were used past their respective discard date. The failure had the potential for medication errors and/or medications being ineffective for the residents. Findings: 1. During a visit to the Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/17/24 at 10:26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary practices in the kitchen and foods were stored under sanitary conditions when: 1. The kitchen floor and corner were seen with dark black areas; 2. Kitchen cleaning cloths were found in the sink and on a food storage container; 3. A container with sliced cheese had no opened date; 4. A food blender was seen with dry and dark brown particles. These failures had the potential to result in food borne illnesses among residents in the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent initial kitchen tour and interview with facility's registered dietitian (RD: a health care professional who had special training in nutrition and food) on 9/16/2024 at 9:26 a.m., dark black areas were noted on the kitchen floor near food preparation, cooking stove, front and under refrigerators 1,2, and 3, under stream table, 3-way sink (used to clean and sanitize [removing germs after cleaning] dishes), vegetable washing sink areas, on chemical stand (place to store sanitizing solution[used to sanitize dishes]) located next…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: 1. The blood pressure cuff was not disinfected between resident use; 2. The shared glucometer (blood glucose meter to measure and display the amount of sugar (glucose) in your blood) was not sanitized and disinfected between resident use; 3. Unlabeled urinals, wash basins, and resident's care items in residents bathrooms; and 4. Resident's care items on the floor. These failures could result in cross-contamination and the spread of infection throughout the facility. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 9/16/24 at 9:15 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) A was observed giving medications to Resident 45. RN A was called away immediately to assist staff with an incident with another resident, Resident 91. RN A used the blood pressure (BP) cuff to obtain reading for Resident 91. After finished, it was put back on the BP cart outside of Resident 45's room. On 9/16/24 at 9:29…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the minimum date set (MDS, an assessment tool) for 2 of 3 sample residents (Resident 39 and 78) when their MDS assessments did not reflect the current status of the residents. This failure had the potential to affect inappropriate care and interventions. Findings: During an initial tour observation on 9/17/2024 at 9:26 a.m., Resident 39 had tracheostomy with mask on. Further observation indicated mask tube attached to cool mist humidifier (a medical device to add moisture to the air). Review of Resident 39's face sheet (FS: a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident was admitted to facility on 7/3/2018, with diagnoses including tracheostomy (a tube placed in to the hole made by surgery the front of the neck and into the windpipe (the tube in the body that carries air that has been breathed in from the upper end of the throat to the lungs [a pair of organs in the chest that perform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR- screening for residents with a mental disorder and residents with intellectual disability) screening was completed and submitted for two of three sample residents (Resident 43 and 85). This failure had the potential for the mentally ill sample residents to not specialized health care and services. Findings: Review of Resident 43 face sheet (FS: a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 43 admitted to facility on 8/14/2024. Resident FS also indicated Resident 43 admitted with diagnoses included psychosis (a serious mental disorder characterized by a disconnect from reality), anxiety (excessive and persistent worry and fear of everyday situations), obsessive-compulsive disorder (uncontrollable, recurring thoughts and engages in repetitive behaviors), and adult personality disorder (a disorder of thinking, feeling, behaving, and relating to others in a way that is different to the average person). Review of Resident 43's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and secure environment for three sampled residents (48, 74, and 91) when: 1. Resident 48 and 74 Wander Guard (a device that activates an alarm when a resident attempts to leave a safe area) devices were not checked for proper functioning; 2. The interdisciplinary team (IDT: a group of healthcare professionals with various areas of expertise who work together toward the goals of resident's care) 's reommendation and care plan intervetnion was not followed for Resident 91 after a fall; 3. Cleaning supplies were left in a shared bathroom used by multiple residents. These failures had the potential for elopement (leave a facility without staff knowledge) and compromise the residents safety of the residents. Findings: During an observation on 9/19/24 at 4:20 p.m., Resident 48 was dressed in street clothes and laying on top of her bed sleeping. There was a Wander Guard on her right ankle. Review of Resident 48's physician order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care according to facility policy and procedures for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 20) when a registered nurse (RN A) did not check gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube that goes directly into the stomach [part of digestive system] and used for giving tube feeding formula and medications) placement (by injecting air and listening to the stomach with a stethoscope) before tube feeding administration. This failure had the potential for enteral feeding complications that could cause harm to this resident. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/18/24 at 12:20 p.m., RN A stated she gave a water flush in Resident 20's G-tube without checking the placement in the stomach and the tube feeding was running continuously for some time that why she did not check the placement. During an interview with the director of nursing (DON) on 9/18/24 at 3:50 p.m., the DON stated I expect the nursing staff to check placement by injecting an air bolus, listening to gurgling sounds in the stomach, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice for five sampled residents (5, 11, 32, 58, and 92) when: 1. For Resident 5 and 32, the facility administered oxygen with no physician order; 2. For Residents 58 and 92, the oxygen tubing was undated and uncovered when not in use. 3. For Resident 11, the facility administered oxygen without physician order and the oxygen tubing was undated. These failures had the potential to affect the residents' care and could jeopardize their health and well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 5's clinical record indicated she had diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe) and respiratory disorders. During an observation on 9/16/24 at 10:33 a.m., Resident 5 was lying in bed receiving oxygen through a nasal cannula (NC, plastic tubing inserted into the nostrils and attached to an oxygen source). The oxygen concentrator (device used to deliver oxygen) was set at four liters per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate food preferences for two of four sample residents (Resident 46 and 16). This failure had the potential for decreased meal intake, negative effect on health and well-being for the residents. Findings: Review of Resident 46's lunch tray card for 9/16/2024 indicated, Notes and Alert: Ground Meat. Review of facility's lunch menu cycle 4 2023 indicated for Monday, Polish Sausage During lunch meal observation on 9/16/2024 at 12;45 p.m., noted Resident 46 served lunch plate with bite size cut meat pieces along with other menu food items. During an interview with certified nursing assistant B (CNA B) on 9/16/2024 at 12:50 p.m., CNA B confirmed Resident 46 received bite size cut polish sausage for lunch meal. CNA B also reviewed and confirmed Resident 46's lunch tray card indicated ground meat under notes and alerts. CNA B stated kitchen staff should have served ground meat to Resident 46 instead of bite size cut sausage pieces. CNA B took Resident 46's lunch plate to kitchen, came back with another lunch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1's MDS weight and continence were inaccurately documented. Failure to accurately assess had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to develop and implement interventions to meet the resident's needs. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including femur fracture (a break in the thigh bone), sepsis (an extreme bodily response to an infection), obesity (a disorder that involves having excessive body fat), and kidney disease. Review of Resident 1's Weights and Vitals Summary indicated Resident 1 weighed 231.4 pounds (lbs, unit of weight measurement) on 7/17/24. The Weights and Vitals Summary further indicated Resident 1 weighed 220.8 lbs on 7/22/24. Resident 1's MDS, dated [DATE], was reviewed. Section K0200 was designated to document the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address non-compliance (not cooperating with care) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to implement interventions. Findings: Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a disease that causes breathing difficulty due to blocked airflow from the lungs) and respiratory failure (a condition in which the blood does not have enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide). During an interview with respiratory therapist B (RT B) on 8/12/24, at 10:49 a.m., RT B stated Resident 1 had a laryngectomy (surgical removal of the voice box) and would breath through the laryngectomy stoma (surgically created opening in the neck created during laryngectormy). RT B stated Resident 1 also had a laryngectomy tube (also known as a larytube, a small flexible tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a pain medication order was signed by the physician for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). This failure had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to administer the pain medication to Resident 2 when needed. Findings: Review of Resident 2's medical record indicated Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including polyneuropathy (a condition of the nerves that often causes weakness, numbness, and pain). During an interview with Resident 2 on 8/12/24, at 2:40 p.m., Resident 2 stated that over the past weekend, she was told she could not receive her oxycodone (medication used to treat pain) because the physician had not signed the order for the medication. Resident 2 explained the oxycodone was ordered as needed (PRN, only to be administered when requested by the resident) and she would normally be able to receive it every six hours. Review of Resident 2's physician's orders indicated there was an order, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman (resident advocate) office was notified of hospital transfers for two of three sampled residents (Residents 2 and 3). This failure had the potential to result in the residents not having someone to advocate for their admission, transfer, and discharge rights. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 2's clinical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and had a fracture (break) of the left foot and a laceration (cut) on the left hand. Review of Resident 2's Progress Notes, dated 11/9/23, indicated the physician examined Resident 2's left hand wound and told the facility to transfer the resident to the hospital. Review of Resident 2's Hospital Transfer Form, dated 11/9/23, indicated he was transferred to the hospital at 6:58 p.m. There was no documentation in the clinical record that indicated the facility notified the Ombudsman office of Resident 2's hospital transfer. During an interview and concurrent record review with social services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide skin treatments as ordered by the physician for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure put the resident as risk for developing further skin breakdown. Findings: Resident 1's physician's order, dated 4/9/24, indicated, MASD (Moisture Associated Skin Damage) to perineum (genital area or the triangle area between the thighs). Apply Calmoseptine (ointment used to provide moisture barrier that protects and helps skin heal) to affected area every shift for 21 days. Resident 1's 4/2024 treatment administration record (TAR) was reviewed. The TAR indicated that Resident 1's skin treatments with Calmoseptine were not documented as completed on 4/10/24 during the evening shift, on 4/11/24 during the day shift, on 4/13/24 during both the day and the evening shift, on 4/14/24 during the day shift, on 4/15/24 during the evening shift, on 4/17/24 during the day shift, on 4/19/24 during the evening shift, and on 4/21/24 during the day shift. Resident 1's physician's order, dated 4/17/24, indicated, MASD to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and treatment was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for 6 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) when physician orders for monitoring of indwelling urinary catheters (tube placed inside the urinary bladder to drain urine) were not followed. These failures resulted in physician orders to monitor for changes to the urine character to not be carried out as ordered. Findings: Review of Resident 1's physician order dated 7/26/21 indicated, Indwelling catheter: Monitor for change in urine character: Document 0 = none/ C = Cloudiness/ S = Sediment/ FS = Foul Smell/ B = Blood in urine/ DC = Deepening or Concentrating urine output. Notify MD for potential UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) every shift. Review of Resident 1's physician order dated 7/26/21 indicated Indwelling Catheter: Monitor for S/S (signs and symptoms) of possible urinary infection and notify MD. Document 0 = none/ FP = Flank Pain or SP = suprapubic pain or T = Tenderness/ CU = Change in character of urine (New…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses had specific competencies (the ability to do something successfully or efficiently) and skills sets necessary to care for residents' needs when: 1. Performance evaluations (a formal and productive procedure to measure an employee's work and results based on their job responsibilities) were not completed for licensed vocational nurses (LVN F (hire date 1/2/2012), LVN H (hire date 2/1/22), LVN J (hire date 1/17/22). 2. Skill check list (practical lists that detail for employees the skills they are required to perform and the level of performance that is expected for each skill) were not completed for five of six licensed nurses (LVN E, LVN F, LVN H, LVN J, and LVN L). 3. Registry staff orientation (the process of introducing temporary employees to their responsibilities, co-workers and workplace, company expectations and policies) was not complete for three of three Registry Licensed vocational Nurses (LVN E, LVN J, LVN L). These failures had the potential for residents not to receive appropriate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of four of 19 sampled residents (Residents 7, 22, 39, and 45) and one non-sampled Resident (Resident 194) in regards to controlled medications (medications with high potential for abuse and addiction) in that they were not fully reconciled after removal and accounted for during shift change when: 1. Resident 194 did not receive his Norco (a potent controlled medication for pain) timely, resulting in unnecessary and preventable pain for the resident; 2. Resident 45 did not receive his routine pain medication, buprenorphine (a potent narcotic for pain) for four and a half days, subjecting the resident to unnecessary pain; 3. Resident 22's Daptomycin (an antibiotic to treat various infections) was delayed for two days after it was ordered. This had the potential for worsening of the resident's infection; 4. Resident 39 did not receive his routine medications timely, subjecting the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper labeling and storage of medications according to the facility policy and procedures (P&P) and/or manufacturer's specifications when: - Temperature (temp) monitoring was missing and/or not consistently documented twice daily on the temp log sheets for 3 months for one of one observed medication refrigerator; and - Medications were not properly labeled and stored in two of four inspected medication carts. These deficient practices had the potential for inadequately monitored medications, which could lead to unsafe and ineffective medications for the residents, unsafe and reduced efficacy from being used past their discard date, and medication errors due to medications not being labeled. Findings: 1. During a visit to the main medication room with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) D on [DATE] at 11:05 a.m., a large medication refrigerator (fridge) was identified. The thermometer reading inside the fridge indicated 34 degrees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dignity of one of 87 residents (Resident 33) when a staff member was standing over the resident while helping him to eat, instead of sitting down. This failure had the potential to have a negative effect on the resident's psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a dining room observation on 8/8/23 at 1:00 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant N (CNA N) was observed standing in front of Resident 33 while feeding him. During an interview on 8/8/23 at 1:10 p.m. with CNA N, she confirmed above observation, she stated she was not sure if she should sit down. During a review of Resident 33's Activity of Daily Living (ADL) care plan, it indicated the resident was total dependent for eating. During an interview on 8/11/23 at 10:37 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), he stated staffs should be sitting down at an eye level while feeding the residents. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Assistance with Meals, revised March 2022, the P&P indicated, Dining Room Residents: [ .] 3.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (organization that advocates for the residents) when two of 19 sampled residents (Residents 9 and 55) were transferred to the acute care hospital from the facility without notifying the Ombudsman. This failure had the potential to compromise the residents' admission, transfer, and discharge rights. Findings: Review of Resident 9's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 9 was transferred to the acute hospital from the dialysis center on [DATE]. Resident 9 became unresponsive during dialysis treatment, was given CPR, and then transferred to the acute hospital. Resident 9 was admitted to the acute care hospital and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 55's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 55 was transferred to the acute care hospital on [DATE] due to severe groin pain. Resident 55 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards and facility policy and procedures for three of 19 sampled residents (Residents 6, 44, and 82), when: 1. The nursing staff failed notify the physician when Resident 82 repeatedly refused his blood sugar checks and insulin (medication to lower blood sugar); 2. For Resident 44, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) H failed to document his routine medication administration on the medication administration record (MAR) for 4 days in July and one day in August 2023 during her shift; and 3. For Resident 6, the facility staff did not carry out the physician's order timely. These failures had the potential to cause complications for the residents' medical conditions. Findings: 1. Resident 82 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Alzheimer's dementia (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and diabetes (disease that impairs the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and recorder review, the facility failed to ensure one of four hospice residents (Resident 17), received needed care and services when hospice orders were not transcribed into resident's chart timely. This failures had the potential to compromise the resident's comfort and well-being. Findings: During an interview on 8/8/23 at 10:35 p.m. with Resident 17, he stated he had pain with pain level 13 out of 10 last night, and he requested pain medication, but the staff told him there was nothing to give him for pain. During a review of Resident 17's hospice admission assessment dated [DATE], it indicated, Resident 17 was admitted to hospice care (a type of care prioritized comfort and quality of life by reducing pain and suffering for terminally ill residents) on 8/6/23 with order: Morphine concentrate (a medication commonly utilized for imminently dying residents to control pain and relieve breathing problems) 100mg/5mL (20mg/mL) oral solution, take 5mg, 10mg, 20mg by mouth or under the tongue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment was maintained when a bottle of disinfectant was found at the bedside of Resident 42. This had the potential for residents to access a hazardous substance. Findings: During an observation of Resident 42 's room on 8/7/23 at 11:10 a.m., Resident 42's bedside tabletop had a 1-gallon container of antiseptic solution (liquid substance that stops or slows down the growth of microorganisms) without the lid and reddish liquid residuals on the sides of the bottle. The label on the bottle of antiseptic solution indicated Warnings - For external use only and Drug Facts - Keep out of eyes, ears, and mouth . If swallowed, get medical help or contact a Poison Control Center right away. Next to the bottle of antiseptic solution was a plastic cup with this same reddish liquid along with some gauze inside of it, an open bottle of tabasco with no lid, and a plastic container of cashews. During a concurrent observation and interview with licensed vocational nurse B (LVN B) on 8/7/23 at 11:17 a.m., she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care according to facility policy and procedures for two of 19 sampled residents (Residents 6 and 55) and two non-sampled Residents (Residents 19 and 51) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) A did not check the tube placement before medication adminisration for Resident 19, 2. Tube feeding formula for Residents 6 was unlabeled, 3. An unlabeled and opened bag of tube feeding formula was left at Resident 55's bedside. These failures had the potential for enteral feeding complications that could cause harm to residents. Findings: 1. During a medication administration observation on 8/7/23 at 8:30 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) A was observed preparing 10 medications for Resident 19. She crushed each solid medication individually and diluted each with about 30 mL of water. After she finished, she brought the medications, along with an 8-ounce cup of water, to the resident's bedside. On 8/7/23 at 8:35 a.m., LVN A was observed attaching a syringe to Resident 19's gastrotomy tube (GT or G-tube - a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 9) receiving renal dialysis (medical procedure for removing waste products and excess fluid from the blood through an artificial kidney) when: 1. There was no documentation of assesments and/or monitoring of the arteriovenous fistula shunt (AVF shunt, a connection surgically made between an artery and a vein for dialysis access), 2. Dialysis communication records (DCRs) were incomplete, 3. A dialysis care plan was not resident-centered, and 4. Licensed nurses were not trained on monitoring Resident 9's AVF shunt. These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 9 to be inadequately assessed and be at risk for developing undetected complications related to dialysis treatment. Findings: Review of Resident 9's medical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and had the diagnosis of end stage renal disease (ESRD, the kidneys no longer function as they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) failed to identify and report to the facility medication-related irregularities during the monthly medication regimen review (MRR) for two of 19 sampled residents (Residents 7 and 82). The failure resulted in inadequate medication monitoring for the residents which had the potential to compromise their health. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 7's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease (long-term condition that develops over many years in people who have high blood pressure) and hyperlipidemia (high lipids in the blood). A review of Resident 7's physician orders indicated an order for atorvastatin 20 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) one time a day for hyperlipidemia since 1/20/23. A review of Lexicomp, a nationally recognized drug information, indicated, for patients receiving atorvastatin, Fasting lipid profile should be rechecked 4 to 12 weeks after starting therapy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 19 sampled residents (Resident 7 and 193) were free from unnecessary medications when Resident 7 received atorvastatin (Lipitor: medication to treat high cholesterol and triglyceride levels in the blood) without lab work for lipid panel; and Resident 193 received an anticoagulant (a blood thinner to prevent blood clots) without the staff monitoring for signs and symptoms of bleeding. The failure resulted inadequate monitoring for effectiveness and side effects of medications for the residents. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 7's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease (long-term condition that develops over many years in people who have high blood pressure) and hyperlipidemia (high lipids in the blood). A review of Resident 7's physician orders indicated an order for atorvastatin 20 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) one time a day for hyperlipidemia, dated 1/20/23. A review of Lexicomp, a nationally recognized drug information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 19 sampled residents (Residents 30, 45, and 82) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors), when: 1. Resident 82 received medications, Seroquel (quetiapine, an antipsychotic medication) and simvastatin (medication to treat high blood lipids), that could affect blood lipids without the monitoring for lipids; 2. Residents 45 and 82 received long-term use of Seroquel without periodic Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS, a rating scale designed to measure involuntary movements known as tardive dyskinesia [TD], a disorder that sometimes develops as a side effect of long-term treatment with antipsychotic medications) assessment; and 3. Resident 30's physician order for as-needed Ativan (lorazepam, medication to treat agitation or anxiety) did not have a specified duration. The deficient practices resulted in inadequately monitored drug therapy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 5.41% when two medication errors occurred out of 37 opportunities during the medication administration observation for two out of seven residents (Residents 19 and 43). The nursing staff did not flush the resident's gastrostomy tube (G-tube; a tube surgically inserted through the abdomen into the stomach to administer nutrition and medications) prior to and after medication administration in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice. Resident 43 received his insulin (medication to lower blood sugar) 1 hour and 10 minutes before a meal, a practice inconsistent with the manufacturer's specifications. The failure had the potential for complications or adverse effects (such as clogging of G-tube or uncontrolled blood sugar) for the residents. Findings: 1. A review of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) Consensus Recommendation titled Safe Practices for Enteral Nutrition Therapy, dated 1/2017, indicated that when administering medication via…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention practices were followed when two facility staff did not wear the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE; gloves, gown, mask, and face shield) while providing care to Resident 4, who was on Contact Precaution (intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents spread by direct or indirect contact with the patient or the patient's environment). This failure had the potential to compromise the health and well-being of residents and staff members in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/7/2023, at 3:45 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant P (CNA P) in front of Resident 4's room, it was observed that a sign was posted on Resident 4's doorway indicating the necessity of Contact Precautions. Providers and staff were required to put on gloves and gowns before entering the room. CNA P was observed applying gloves outside Resident 4's doorway and stated they were going to help Resident 4 with his shower. CNA P did not put on an isolation gown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROVIDENCE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/11/2023 |
| O'SHEA, BRADY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2023 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/11/2023 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/11/2023 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/11/2023 |
| MURRAY, JASON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/11/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $787K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055739. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.