No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Balboa Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

3520 Fourth Avenue, San Diego, CA 92103 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 194 certified beds · (619) 291-5270 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (619) 291-5270 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0740)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3500 5th Ave · (909) 884-8994 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3580 5th Ave Fl 2 · (619) 516-8931 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3403 1st Ave · (619) 295-7666 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3563 7th Ave · (619) 696-7227 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
625 Pennsylvania Ave · (619) 298-7729

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.8%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.5%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms22.8%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.8%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.4%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.3%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.8%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.4%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.7%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.3%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.2%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.402.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.121.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 368 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
74.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.81U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.42hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.32hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 74.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 223 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.81 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.5%CMS range 51.5–62.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 8.1–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge74.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge61.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge89.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.7–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.261.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
1.01
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.18
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.79
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
37.2%
Total nursing turnover
43.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 194 beds and averages 181.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-15)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2022-08-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident (Resident 1) with suicidal ideation (SI, when you think about, consider or feel preoccupied with the idea of death and suicide) tendency from harm, when staff did not: 1. Supervise Resident 1 with known SI tendencies to harm herself with overdosing on medications and cut herself with a butter knife, 2. Follow through on a provider ' s recommendations (five opportunities) for SI safe monitoring of Resident 1, 3. Developed of interdisciplinary and core staff communication for the planning, monitoring and evaluating Resident 1 ' s plan of care related to overdosing self, to ensure Resident 1 did not have access to medications for her safety and well-being, and, 4. Fully account for Resident 1 ' s belongings including medications from home. As a result, these failures provided Resident 1 an opportunity to harm herself by overdosing on her medications from home and cutting herself with a metal butterknife on 1/20/25. Resident 1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse for one of three sampled resident (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for further abuse to Resident 1. Findings: On 4/14/26 at 6:48 P.M. the Department received a complaint from a hospital staff. The hospital staff stated a resident (Resident 1) who came from (name of facility) skilled nursing facility (SNF) told him that he was physically assaulted by a staff at the SNF where he was residing. On 4/22/26 at 9:55 A.M., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate an abuse allegation involving Resident 1. Per the Facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Depression (a serious, common mental health condition causing persistent sadness, low interest and low energy) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the use of unnecessary drugs by administering antibiotics without adequate indication, monitoring or appropriate duration, for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3) reviewed from 12 residents identified on the Infection Preventionist (IP) list of health-care associated infection (HAI-infections acquired at the facility) for urinary tract infections (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) when:1. Resident 1 received an order for an antibiotic on 1/9/26 for Macrobid (a commonly prescribed antibiotic used specifically to treat bacterial urinary tract infections) without supporting documentation for monitoring UTI symptoms and/or side effect monitoring. Resident 1 received two antibiotics Levofloxacin (used to treat bacterial infections in many different parts of the body) for UTI and Methenamine Hippurate(an antibiotic used to prevent or treat recurring urinary tract infections) for infection prophylaxis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to implement an effective infection control prevention and antibiotic (medication for infection) stewardship (responsible use) process for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3) reviewed from 12 residents identified on the Infection Preventionist (IP) list of health-care associated infection (HAI-infections acquired at the facility) for urinary tract infections (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) when:1. Resident 1 received an order for an antibiotic on 1/9/26 for Macrobid (a commonly prescribed antibiotic used specifically to treat bacterial urinary tract infections) without supporting documentation for monitoring UTI symptoms and/or side effect monitoring. Resident 1 received two antibiotics Levofloxacin (used to treat bacterial infections in many different parts of the body) for UTI and Methenamine Hippurate (an antibiotic used to prevent or treat recurring urinary tract infections) for infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — widespread
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect and keep private residents' Protected Health Information (PHI- refers to any individual identifiable health information that is created, received, stored or transmitted by a healthcare provider which includes demographic data, medical history, test results, and payment information and this information is protected under HIPPA-the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) for 59 of 194 residents when it posted lists of residents' Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th floor shower rooms.This failure did not protect the residents' medical privacy and had the potential to allow residents' PHI to be seen by anyone going into the shower room. Findings:On 1/9/26 at 10:35 A.M., a concurrent observation of the 3rd floor shower room and interview with Certified Nursing Assistant 5 (CNA) was conducted. A document titled 3rd Floor EBP was posted on the shower mirror when entering the room. This document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for four of nine residents (3,4,5,16) when it did not fix leaking ceilings and windows in resident rooms 417,421, and 425.This failure created hazardous non-homelike environment for the affected residents when it rained.Findings:On 1/2/26 between 2 P.M and 4:10 P.M, a concurrent interview with the Director of Maintenance (DOM) and tour of the facility's kitchen, the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th floor residents' room was conducted. All resident rooms on each floor were observed and alert residents were interviewed. The DOM stated that they (the facility) just got a new roof, and the only leak that staff had told him about was the leak in the 3rd floor dining room, and it was fixed by resealing the sliding glass door with caulk. A tour of the fourth floor was conducted and three rooms (417, 421, 425) had severe leaks from the ceiling when it rained on 12/31/25 per the residents interviewed (Resident 3, 4, 5, 16).Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify a resident's behavior of hitting and yelling at staff and residents for one of two residents reviewed for behavioral disturbances. (Resident 1) This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have further altercations with other residents of the facility and a potential safety risk for Resident 1.Findings: On 11/26/25 at 8:23 A.M. and on 12/12/25 at 8:25 A.M., an unannounced onsite visit at the facility was conducted related to a reported resident to resident altercations. A review of the facility's five-day (5-day) summary investigation dated 11/17/25 was conducted. The 5-day summary indicated Resident 1 entered another resident's room and grabbed the other resident's walker on 11/14/25. The 5-day summary indicated the other resident initiated physical contact with Resident 1's left inner arm to protect his space. A review of the facility's five-day (5-day) summary investigation dated 12/1/25 was conducted. The 5-day summary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer pain medication for one of two residents (Resident 1) in a timely manner. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk of unnecessary pain. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]and 8/21/25 with diagnoses to include right trochanteric bursitis (inflammation of the hip joint), type 2 diabetes, chronic pain syndrome according to the facility's admission Record. According to the physician History and Physical Examination (H&P) dated 8/22/25, indicated Resident 1 has the capacity to understand and make decisions. On 9/9/25 at 2:22 P.M., concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 stated on 9/5/25 around 2 A. M., she was in severe pain and asked for pain pill multiple times. Resident 1 stated she was not given pain medication at that time. Resident 1 stated there was a lack of communication between the employees. On 9/9/25 at 3:08 P.M., a concurrent interview and record review was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide resident safety when a resident (Resident 1) eloped form the facility without staff being aware. As a result, Resident 1 had successful elopement and was found on 8/19/25. Findings: On 8/18/25 the Department of Public Health received a report of elopement for Resident 1 at 8/16/25 and facility search done at 10 P.M. per the report. During a review of Resident 1's facility record on 8/17/25 at 1:23 P.M. indicated .Resident left facility without MDs [doctor's] order, not informing staffs or signing out.received a report that Resident left the unit around lunch time. Resident does walk throughout building on a daily basis. Resident has not back yet, unknow location at this time. Staff has searched the building and surrounding neighborhood.Observed that established history of walking throughout the premises and able to go back to his room, ambulate around with no assistance. A building-wide search was promptly initiated.but the he could not be located. On 8/19/25 at 12 P.M., an observation of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were obtained, signed, and transcribed to maintain continuity of care one of three residents (Resident 1) reviewed with a wound vacuum assisted closure (vac- medical device used to help wounds heal by creating a vacuum over the wound, drawing out excess fluid and infectious materials, and promoting the formation new tissue) device. As a result, Resident 1 was sent to the hospital without a wound vac as ordered post-operatively (OP) and placed Resident 1 at risk for delayed wound healing infection and worsening of their condition due to improper or interrupted treatment. According to the National Library of Medicine at https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6739293 titled Vacuum assisted closure (VAC)/negative pressure wound therapy dated 6/19/19, indicated .Negative pressure wound therapy stabilizes the wound environment, reduces wound edema/bacterial load, improves tissue perfusion [circulation], and stimulates granulation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to supervise residents who smoke according to resident's smoking assessment for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2).As a result, Resident 2 was not supervised as required, which could have led to potential safety risks for smoke related injuries and for other residents who smoke.A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated Resident 2 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of the arm, leg and trunk on the same side of the body) affecting the left side of the body. A record review of Resident 2's minimum data set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 6/30/25 indicated, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- developed by reviewing the resident's status during the prior seven-day period) score of 14 points out of 15 possible points which indicated Resident 14 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the presence of a full-time Director of Nursing (DON) to manage and oversee nursing services. This deficient practice placed all 188 residents at risk for uncoordinated care, delays in addressing clinical concerns, and inconsistent implementation of nursing policies and procedures. On 7/23/25 10:30 A.M., a complaint investigation was initiated with the Administrator (ADM). The ADM stated the facility did not have a Director of Nursing (DON) and would be assisted by the Quality Assurance (QA) nurse for any assistance during the complaint investigation. On 7/23/25 at 1:22 P.M., an interview was conducted with LN 2. LN 2 stated we don't have a full-time DON yet. LN 2 stated the QA nurse was the former DON. On 7/24/25 at 4:02 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Staff Development (DSD). The DSD stated she had only been working as a DSD for one month, so she was not sure if the facility was short or had any staffing waivers. The DSD stated the facility did not have a DON. On 7/30/25 at 10:06…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident, Resident 1, who eloped (a patient leaving a healthcare facility without proper authorization or staff awareness)from the facility late at night, was unlocatable by the facility for nearly 14 hours, and sustained a fall while away from the facility. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to suffer serious injury. Findings: According to a report filed to the Department by Adult Protective Services (APS): On 6/2/25, the police department Psychiatric Emergency Response Team ([NAME]) unit responded to a call for a missing person at risk. During investigation, a clinician learned that Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 knew that Resident 1 left the facility at approximately 1:30 AM and never returned. LN 1 did not report this until shift change at 7:30 AM. A phone call was made to the police at 8:17 AM. The police department filed a missing person at risk report. An unannounced visit was conducted at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document and policy review, the facility failed to follow the prepared menu for residents who received diets with mechanical soft or ground meat for 30 of 183 residents who resided in the facility and failed to follow the prepared menu for residents who received diets with pureed meat for 21 of 183 residents who resided in the facility. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Menus, indicated, Menus are developed and prepared to meet resident choices including religious, cultural and ethnic needs while following established national guidelines for nutritional adequacy. The policy revealed the section titled, Policy Interpretation and Implementation, included, 6. Menus must be followed. Deviations from posted menus are recorded (including the reason for the substitution and/or deviation) and archived. Further review revealed, 8. Menus provide a variety of foods from the basic daily food groups and indicate standard portions at each meal. The facility's Spring Cycle Menus, revealed that the planned lunch meal on 05/13/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for 1 (Resident #92) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Dignity revised 02/2021, indicated, Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. The policy specified, 5. When assisting with care, residents are supported in exercising their rights. For example, residents are: a. groomed as they wish to be groomed; b. encouraged to attend activities of their choice, including religious, political, civic, recreational, or social activities; c. encouraged to dress in clothing that they prefer; d. allowed to choose when to sleep, eat and conduct activities of daily living; and e. provided with a dignified dining experience. A facility policy titled, Assistance with Meals revised 03/2022, indicated, Residents shall receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 2 (Resident #77 and Resident #185) of 38 residents whose MDSs were reviewed. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Assessments, revised 10/2023, revealed the section titled, Policy Interpretation and Implementation, included, 11. All persons who have completed any portion of the MDS resident assessment form must sign the document attesting to the accuracy of such information. 12. Information in the MDS assessments will consistently reflect information in the progress notes, plans of care and resident observations/interviews. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #185 on 01/21/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of multiple rib fractures, a history of falling, and dementia. A discharge MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/12/2025, revealed Resident #185 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was followed for 1 (Resident #30) of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Assistance with Meals, revised 03/2022, specified, Residents shall receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs of each resident. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #30 on 02/25/2013. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (partial weakness on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and functional quadriplegia. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/06/2024, revealed Resident #30 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #30 required supervision or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed a physician's order for supervision during meals for 1 (Resident #30) of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Assistance with Meals, revised 03/2022, specified, Residents shall receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs of each resident. The policy revealed the section titled, Policy Interpretation and Implementation, included, 2. Facility staff will serve resident trays and will help residents who require assistance with eating. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #30 on 02/25/2013. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (partial weakness on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and functional quadriplegia. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide timely podiatry services for 1 (Resident #388) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Podiatry Services revised 02/2023, indicated, It is the policy of this facility to ensure residents receive proper treatment and care within professional standards of practice and state scope of practice, as applicable, to maintain mobility and good foot health. The policy specified, 5. The social worker or designer will assist residents in making appointments and arranging transportation to obtain needed services. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #388 on 04/14/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of muscle weakness and dorsalgia (back pain). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/21/2025, revealed Resident #388 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to communicate and develop a baseline care plan (detailed plan with information about a patient's treatment, goal, and interventions) related to a resident ' s (Resident 1) suicidal ideation (SI, when you think about, consider or feel preoccupied with the idea of death and suicide) tendency for one of one sampled resident. As a result, the lack of communication among facility staff related to Resident 1 ' s SI and a resident centered care plan with specific interventions to monitor Resident 1 from harming herself with overdosing of medications and cutting herself with a butter knife on 1/20/25. Findings: A record review was conducted of Resident 1. Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body), per the facility ' s admission Record. A record review was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to prevent Resident 1 from physically assaulting Resident 2. This failure resulted in Resident 2 sustaining a physical injury and feeling fearful. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings). Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included displaced fracture of 6thand 7th vertebra (bones of the spine). On 7/22/24 the State Agency (SA) received a report from the facility which indicated, (Resident 1) walked up to (Resident 2) and hit him on the left cheek.(Resident 2) had verbalized he did not feel safe until (Resident 1) was discharged . On 8/2/24 at 9:50 AM, a concurrent interview and record review of the 7/21/24 11:26 A.M. Event Note was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The Event Note indicated, (Resident 1) was noted striking (Resident 2) in the dining room by staff member .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the responsible party (RP) was notified timely of resident's skin issues and resident's change of condition (COC) for one of seven residents (Resident 1), reviewed for quality of care. This failure resulted in Resident 1's responsible party unaware of Resident 1's current health status. Findings: An unannounced onsite to the facility was conducted on 6/10/24 related to complaints on quality of care that happened in 2022. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included bacteremia (blood stream infection) and diabetes (high blood sugar), per the facility's admission Record. The admission record indicated the RP, and first emergency contact number was Resident 1's family member (FM). On 6/10/24, 6/13/24 and 6/25/24, Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed: The Minimum Data Set (MDS, a clinical assessment tool), dated 1/13/22, listed a cognitive (ability to recall) score of six out of 15 (0-7, indicating severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide skin care and administer intravenous (IV) antibiotics (anti-infective) medication, as ordered by the physician, for one of seven residents (Resident 1) reviewed for quality of care. These failures had the potential to affect Resident 1's health and well-being. Findings: An unannounced onsite to the facility was conducted on 6/10/24 related to complaints on quality of care that happened in 2022. 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included bacteremia (blood stream infection) and diabetes (high blood sugar), per the facility's admission Record. On 6/13/24 and 6/25/24, Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed: The Minimum Data Set (MDS, a clinical assessment tool), dated 1/13/22, listed a cognitive (ability to recall) score of six out of 15 (0-7, indicating severe cognitive impairment, 8-12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment, 13-15 suggests cognition is intact). 1a. According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 signed a resident's initial skin evaluation timely for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) reviewed for skin conditions. As a result, Resident 1's medical record did not reflect timely completion of assessment. Findings: An unannounced onsite to the facility was conducted on 6/10/24 related to complaints on quality of care that happened in 2022. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the admission Record. Resident 1 was discharged from the facility on 2/5/22. On 6/10/24 and 6/25/24, Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed: According to the skin and wound evaluation conducted to Resident 1 on 1/7/22, LN 1 conducted the skin assessment on Resident 1. LN 1 identified the following Resident 1's skin conditions on admission: - Abrasion to the left elbow, - Abrasion to left outer forearm, - Rash on spine [sic], - Rash on upper left abdomen, - Rash on sternum [sic], - MASD on coccyx, and - MASD on groin.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medical records were accurate for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's medical record indicated a licensed vocational nurse (LVN 1) administered an intravenous (IV) antibiotics (anti-infective) medication. As a result, documenting that an IV medication was administered to Resident 1 by a LVN, was not acceptable per standards of practice and could cause confusion among the healthcare providers. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included osteomyelitits (inflammation or swelling that occurs in the bone) of the backbone, per the facility's admission Record. During a record review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR, is used to document medications taken by a patient that includes the type of medication given and the signature of the licensed staff member) for May 2024, the MAR for 5/15/24 at 12 midnight and at 4 A.M. indicated LVN 1 signed the MAR for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent RNA (CNAs with specialized certification to provide rehabilitation services) to five of 12 residents (Resident 44, 55, 82, 112, 162) reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM). This failure had the potential for residents to experience a decrease in mobility and worsening contractures (permanent tightening of the muscles and tendons causing the joints to stiffen). Findings: 1. Resident 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included complete traumatic left lower leg amputation, per the facility's admission Record. On 8/23/22 at 9 A.M., an observation was conducted with Resident 44 as he sat on the side of his bed. Resident 44 had a left leg prosthesis (artificial limb) standing next to the bed. On 8/24/22 at 10:42 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR). The DOR stated Resident 44 was last seen for physical therapy on 4/26/22. The DOR stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide communication tools for two of four (Residents 48 and 114), reviewed for communication. This failure had the potential for staff to be unaware of the needs of Residents 48 and 114. Findings: 1. Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the admission Record. 1. On 8/22/22 at 9:52 A.M., an observation was conducted of Resident 48 as he laid in bed. Resident 48 was unable to converse, due to a language barrier. The walls and the table tops contained no language tools for translation. Observed next to the telephone on the bedside table, were three handwritten phone numbers. On 8/23/22 Resident 48's clinical record was reviewed. The admission MDS (an assessment tool), dated 6/24/22, listed a cognitive score of 10, indicating moderate impaired cognition. The MDS section A1100, listed Language as, Vietnam/Cantonese. The care plan, titled Language Barrier, dated 6/9/22, listed Chinese, with an intervention of, Assist with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect confidential information for one of one resident reviewed for privacy (5). This failure had the potential for residents' private medical information to be visible to unauthorized persons. Findings: On 8/24/22 at 8:30 A.M., an observation was conducted of one of three nursing stations. On the upper counter of the nurses' station were two documents, with one document taped on the countertop. Two residents walked by the counter where the documents were observed. In addition, three facility staff members walked by the counter. One paper indicated, Day and date, [Facility Name Visitation Schedule] and listed five resident names. The document listed the time of the residents' outdoor, indoor, and Facetime video call with contact information. The second document indicated, 1:1 Monitoring Assignment, with the residents' name and room number written on the page. On 8/24/22 at 8:37 A.M., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the DSD. The DSD stated she did not know how long the documents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for: 1. Oral hygiene for one of three residents reviewed for dental concerns (107) and, 2. Application of a medicated shampoo for one of one residents reviewed for skin conditions (107). This failure had the potential to place Resident 107 at risk for further dental complications and worsening skin condition. Findings: 1. Resident 107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the admission Record. On 8/22/22 at 10:31 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 107. Resident 107 stated nobody had brushed or flossed her teeth that morning. On 8/22/22 at 11:59 A.M., an interview was conducted with CNA 1. CNA 1 stated the CNA's were to brush and floss Resident 107's teeth after every meal. CNA 1 stated she had not brushed or flossed Resident 107's teeth yet that morning. On 8/23/22 at 9:59 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 1. LN 1 stated the physician had ordered tooth brushing using an electric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medicated shampoo was applied as stipulated by facility policy, for one of one residents reviewed for skin conditions (107). This failure had the potential to place Resident 107 at risk for further skin complications. Findings: Resident 107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the admission Record. Per a facility policy, revised 10/2018 and titled Medication Administration, Drug Administration refers to the act in which a single dose of a prescribed drug .is given to a resident by an authorized person .I. Who may administer: Only a licensed nurse .may administer medication . Per a facility policy, revised October 2010 and titled Administering Topical Medications, .The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of topical medication .3. Place the MAR within easy viewing distance. 4. Unlock the medication cart. 5. Select the drug from the .drawer .9. Prepare the correct dose of medication.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for one of two residents (69) reviewed for ADLs. This failure had the potential to result in an increased risk for infection. Findings: Resident 69 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diabetes (high blood sugar), per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 69's MDS (an assessment tool), dated 7/8/22, indicated his brief interview for mental status (BIMS - test the resident's cognition status) was 14 (13- 15 indicated intact cognition). The MDS section G indicated Resident 69 needed a one-person physical assist on personal hygiene. On 8/22/22 at 9:55 A.M., an observation and interview of Resident 69 was conducted. Resident 69 was lying in bed and placed his hands on top of his chest. Resident 69's fingernails were long, and had dirt underneath. Resident 69 stated his nails were long and needed to be trimmed. Resident 69 stated he told the staff and he was still…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff provided assistance with eating for two of two residents reviewed for ADLs (40, 32). As a result, Residents 40 and 32 were unable to eat their meals. Findings: 1. Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dysphasia (difficulty swallowing) per the facility's admission Record. On 8/24/22 at 8:17 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview of Resident 40 was conducted. Resident 40 was awake, in bed with a breakfast tray in front of him on top of the bedside table. Resident 40's head of bed was noted to be lower than the bedside table. Resident 40 attempted to reach up for the utensils but was unable to. Resident 40 stated he had been waiting for the staff to assist him with his breakfast for about ten minutes. At 8:25 A.M., Resident 40 attempted to reach up for the utensils again and was unsuccessful. On 8/24/22 at 8:40 A.M., a joint observation of Resident 40 and an interview with CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure provision of pharmacy services met the needs of the residents when: 1. Discontinued medications were left in the medication cart for resident use; 2. Metoprolol (medication to treat high blood pressure) was not administered as ordered by the physician for Resident 29. This had the potential to increase the risk for dizziness, confusion, and fainting; and 3. Midodrine (medication to treat low blood pressure) was not administered as ordered by the physician for Resident 112. This had the potential to increase the risk for heart disease and stroke. Findings: 1. On 8/23/22, at 3:30 P.M., the medication cart on third floor was inspected with LN 41 and there were two discontinued medications stored in the medication cart along with active medications: One blister pack containing clonidine (medication to treat high blood pressure) 0.1 milligram (mg) tablets for Resident 104 that was discontinued on 5/18/22; and One box containing 30 tablets of Zofran…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist, in their monthly medication regimen review, identified and reported irregularities in the medication therapy of the residents when: 1. Resident 96 had two physician orders for ropinirole (medication to treat restless leg syndrome, uncontrollable urge to move the legs due to uncomfortable sensation) that could potentially exceed the maximum dose for ropinirole specified by the manufacturer; 2. Resident 112 had a physician's order for Norco (narcotic pain medication) despite the resident's documented allergy to morphine (narcotic pain medication similar in structure to Norco); and 3. Resident 112 had physician's orders for citalopram (medication to treat depression, mood disorder causing one to feel sad, empty, loss of interest), Geodon and Seroquel (medications to treat schizophrenia, a serious mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally) in the presence of major drug interactions. These failures could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications when: 1. Resident 121 was receiving apixaban (blood thinner that prevents blood clotting) and was not monitored for signs and symptoms of bleeding; and 2. Resident 112 was receiving levetiracetam (medication to prevent seizures or convulsions) without monitoring for seizure activity or episodes to assess the effectiveness of the medication. Findings: 1. On 8/24/22, Resident 121's medical record was reviewed and the following was noted: The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), and atrial fibrillation (irregular beating of the heart). There was a physician's order on 8/7/22 for apixaban 5 milligram (mg - unit of measurement) with the direction to give the resident one tablet by mouth two times a day for non-valvular (related to heart valve) atrial fibrillation and monitor for signs and symptoms of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from excessive, unnecessary psychotropic medications when: 1. Resident 29 had physician orders for two antidepressant medications for depression (sad mood and lack of interest) in the same therapeutic class without documented rationale for use; and 2. Resident 112 had physician's orders for two antipsychotic medications without documented rationale for use. These failures could result in medication related adverse events from duplicate medication therapy. Findings: 1. On 8/24/22, Resident 29's medical record was reviewed and the following was noted: The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder. There was a physician's order on 5/25/22 for fluoxetine (brand name: Prozac; medication to treat depression, sad mood and lack of interest) 20 mg (milligram - unit of measurement) with the direction to give the resident one tablet by mouth two times a day for depression.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate for medication pass observation did not exceed 5 percent. There were 29 opportunities. Two medication errors were identified. The error rate was 6.9 percent. Findings: 1. On 8/23/22, at 9:35 A.M., during a medication pass observation, it was observed LN 41 administered four sprays, two in each nostril, from the bottle of fluticasone (medication to treat allergy symptoms such as sneezing, itching, and runny or stuffy nose) nasal spray to Resident 104 without shaking the bottle. The label on the bottle indicated shake gently before using. The resident's medical record indicated there was a physician's order on 8/17/22 for fluticasone suspension with the direction to administer two sprays in each nostril in the morning for allergy. On 8/23/22, at 3:20 P.M., in an interview, LN 41 acknowledged he did not shake the bottle. 2. On 8/23/22, at 9:35 A.M., during a medication pass observation, it was observed LN 41 administered to Resident 104, two puffs of Pulmicort (medication to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct an antibiotic stewardship (an ongoing program to monitor and review antibiotic use) for one of three residents (Resident 41), reviewed for infections. This failure had the potential for Resident 41 to become resistant to antibiotic therapy from the prolonged use. Findings: Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include encephalopathy (a disease of the brain that alters brain function), per the facility's admission Record. On 8/22/22 Resident 41's clinical record was reviewed. The physician's order dated 6/2/22, listed doxycycline (an broad-spectrum antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections in the body) 100 milligrams (mg) one time a day for infection. There was no documentation of where the infection was in the body. There were no documentation of laboratory results, cultures or x-rays results following the 6/2/22 start date. There was no documentation of an antibiotic stewardship review by the infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-18 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinicians followed accepted Resident Assessment Instrument (resident care planning) guidelines to accurately assess anticoagulant (blood thinner) use on the Minimum Data Set (MDS-screening tool) for 11 of 36 sampled residents (8, 45, 48, 91, 95, 113, 121, 128, 130, 135, and 138). This failure provided inaccurate resident information to the federal database, and had the potential to affect the residents' care. Findings: Per Section N0410E of the RAI Version 3.0, dated October 2018, . Per N0410E, Anticoagulant (e.g.,warfarin, heparin, or low-molecular weight heparin) 1. Resident 8 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart failure, per the facility's admission Record. On 1/17/19, Resident 8's record was reviewed. The MDS assessment, dated 1/8/19, indicated Resident 8 had received medication classified as an anticoagulant over the last 7 days. No anticoagulant medication had been ordered by the physician. 2. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review. The facility did not provide accommodations for a wheel chair bound resident when 1 of 36 residents, Resident 50, could not reach the shirts hanging in his closet and the paper towels in his bathroom. This deficient practice prevented Resident 50 from achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being in accordance with his needs and preferences. Findings: Resident 50's initial admission to the facility was on 5/23/13 with diagnoses which included, paraplegia (inability to move the legs). On 1/15/19 at 2 P.M., Resident 50 was observed in his room. Resident 50 was observed pulling on the bottom of a shirt that was hanging in his closet. Resident 50 stated, I've been trying to get my shirt off the hanger, but now I need to call the CNA because it is not coming down. On 1/16/19 at 7:45 A.M., CNA 3 was interviewed. CNA 3 stated staff routinely helped Resident 50 by getting clothes down from his closet. On 1/18/19 at 2:15 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 50. Resident 50 stated he could not reach the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to correctly administer an antibiotic medications to 1 of 36 sampled residents (364 ). This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 364's treatment for an infection. Findings: On 1/11/19 Resident 364 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis which included cellulitis (an infection of the skin) of the right lower limb per the facility's admission Record. On 1/16/19 at 8:25 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 16. LN 16 stated Resident 364 had an infection and took Cipro (an antibiotic) for treatment. LN 16 read the label on the Cipro bottle, give PO (by mouth) every 12 hours for 9 days, to be taken 2 hours before or after antacids, iron, and zinc. On 1/16/19 at 8:29 A.M., LN 16 was observed administering medications to Resident 364. LN 16 administered a 500 mg tablet of Cipro, 1 tablet multivitamin (which contained iron and zinc), and a 220 mg tablet of zinc to Resident 364. On 1/18/18 at 2:40 P.M., an interview with LN 16 was conducted. LN 16 stated she did not follow the Cipro label…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-18 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare therapeutic diets (diets prescribed by a physician for treatment of a medical condition) for 1 of 36 sampled residents (176). This failure had the potential for Resident 176 to experience difficulty swallowing when eating and drinking. Findings: Resident 176 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) per the facility's admission Record. During a meal observation on 1/16/19 at 7:45 A.M., Resident 176 had no breakfast while other residents sitting beside him in the dining room were eating their breakfast. CNA 11 was interviewed on 1/16/19 at 7:48 A.M. CNA 11 stated Resident 176's meal tray had been returned to the kitchen because the wrong texture of liquids were on the tray. CNA 11 stated Resident 176's liquids were changed from thickened liquids to thin liquids per the physician's order. During an interview with LN 13 on 1/16/19 at 8:01 A.M., LN 13 stated Resident 176's therapeutic diet changes had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-18 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a hospice agency's contact information, documentation of services, and prospective visit calendar was present in the clinical record for one of two hospice residents (60). As a result, there was the potential to put Resident 60 at risk for delayed or uncoordinated care between the facility healthcare team and the hospice agency. Findings: Resident 60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] under hospice (comfort) care, per the facility's admission Record. On 1/16/19 at 9:40 A.M., an interview was conducted with CNA 21. CNA 21 stated she did not know when the HA (hospice aide) came to care for Resident 60. On 1/16/19 at 10:30 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with LN 21. LN 21 looked at Resident 60's medical record and was unable to find a schedule for hospice visits for December 2018, or January 2019. LN 21 could not find documentation of hospice visits from 11/22/18 to 1/16/19. LN 21 stated she could not find the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-01-18 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their smoking policy when 1 of 36 sampled residents was not informed, assessed, or referred to the DON when smoking. (364) As a result, Resident 364 was not provided a safe smoking environment. Findings: Resident 364 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include nicotine dependence, per the facility's admission Record. On 1/17/19 at 3:21 P.M., an interview with Resident 364 was conducted. Resident 364 stated he was not provided with paperwork related to non-smoking. Resident 364 stated, during his admission, the staff had not gone through his belongings, nor asked if he was a smoker. Resident 364 stated, he had 2 cigarettes left. Resident 364 stated the staff accompanied him when he smoked on the sidewalk, and by the parking lot. On 1/17/19 at 3:35 P.M., an interview with CNA 40 was conducted. CNA 40 stated she followed and assisted Resident 364 to go out to smoke. On 1/17/19 at 4:15 P.M., an interview with the Admissions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
RAJPER, SALEEMIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/01/2019
CHRISTENSEN, SPENCERIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2021
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$28.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.5M
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 4%Medicare 23%Other / private 73%

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$427per resident / day
operating cost
$12,983per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$461per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056105. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next