Reo Vista Healthcare Center
6061 Banbury St., San Diego, CA 92139 · For profit - Corporation · 162 certified beds · (619) 475-2211 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $25,406 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-18)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.2% | 4.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.1% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.6% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.7% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.5% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.3% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.57 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.07 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 200 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 74.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 262 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.96 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.5%CMS range 54.6–69.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.3%CMS range 6.5–12.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 74.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 78.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 61.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 5.3–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.28 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 162 beds and averages 150.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.96 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.10 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided necessary supervision (1:1 supervision to monitor continuously and not left unattended) according to the care plan to prevent falls for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) who had a known history of falls, impaired safety awareness, and an identified need for ongoing staff presence to prevent unsafe self-transfers and falls. As a result, Resident 1 fell in her room, sustained bruises to the forehead, facial swelling, and bruising on arms associated with pain. Resident 1 was subsequently transferred to the hospital for medical evaluation and treatment. Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included history of Cerebral Infarction (when a blood clot or blockage stops blood from reaching a part of the brain) affecting right dominant (stronger) side and unsteadiness of feet.A record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1), who was frail and had cognitive impairment, was free from an avoidable fall with injury when: 1. Certified nursing assistant (CNA) 2 placed Resident 1 in a wheelchair, who was agitated and was left alone unattended, in the hallway around 2 A.M. 2. Resident 1's written care plan was not followed related to locomotion (how the resident moves between locations including self-sufficiency in a wheelchair) that was required to be provided by at least one staff. As a result, Resident 1 fell out of the wheelchair and hit her head on the floor. Resident 1 sustained a laceration (open wound) to her left forehead that required evaluation at the hospital and sutures (stitches holding the edges of a wound together) to close the laceration. Findings: On 9/26/23 at 8:40 A.M., an onsite investigation was conducted for a complaint that alleged Resident 1 had fallen while unsupervised and sustained a head injury.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurse (LN) 1 administered medications according to acceptable clinical standards of practice for two of three residents (Resident 1 and 2) when: LN 1 documented another LN's medication administration for Resident 1's Cefepime (antibiotic, medication to treat infection). LN 1 administered Resident 2's Vancomycin (antibiotic) at the wrong time (four hours after the prescribed time).This deficient practice had the potential to cause medication errors and ineffective treatment.Findings:1. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include unspecified osteomyelitis (a serious infection of the bone) and chronic ulcer of the left foot.A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, dated 3/1/26 to 3/16/26, indicated, Pharmacy.Cefepime HCl Intravenous Solution Reconstituted (Cefepime HCl) Use 2 gram intravenously every 8 hours for infection .Order Date 03/07/26.End Date 04/18/26.A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure intravenous (IV, a method of administering medications through the veins) antibiotics (medications to treat infection) were administered according to physician's orders for two of three residents (Resident 1 and 2) when:Licensed nurse (LN) 1 documented another LN's medication administration for Resident 1's Cefepime (antibiotic, medication to treat infection).2. LN 1 administered Resident 2's Vancomycin (antibiotic) four hours later than the prescribed time.This deficient practice had the potential for the residents' antibiotic therapy to have reduced efficacy and increased risk for antibiotic resistance.Findings:1. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include unspecified osteomyelitis (a serious infection of the bone) and chronic ulcer of the left foot.A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, dated 3/1/26 to 3/16/26, indicated, Pharmacy.Cefepime HCl Intravenous Solution…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to report alleged abuse of two of eleven sampled residents (Resident 11 & 2) to the State Survey Agency when it did not report when:Resident 1 allegedly kicked Resident 11 in the lower torso.Resident 4 allegedly threw a cup of water on Resident 2 while resting in bed. In addition, the facility failed to send a 5-day follow-up investigation report for both alleged abuse incidents to the State Survey Agency.This failure had the potential for alleged abuse to continue indefinitely and put alleged victims at risk of further physical and psychological harm related to the alleged abuse.Cross Reference: F610Findings:1. Record review of admission Record for Resident 1 indicated he was admitted on [DATE] for diagnoses which included: Fracture of Right Tibia (a break in the large lower leg bone ), Collision with car while on peda-cycle (pedal powered multi-person tour vehicles), Hypertension (high blood pressure), and Alcohol Dependence with Withdrawal (a chronic condition where the brain develops a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate alleged abuse of two of eleven sampled residents (Resident 11 & 2) when it did not adequately investigate the following incidents:1. Resident 1 allegedly kicked Resident 11 in the lower torso.2. Resident 4 allegedly threw a cup of water on Resident 2. This failure had the potential for alleged abuse to continue indefinitely and put alleged victims at risk of further abuse, bodily, and mental harm related to the alleged abuse.Cross Reference: F609Findings:1. Record review of admission Record for Resident 1 indicated he was admitted on [DATE] for diagnoses which included: Fracture of Right Tibia (a break in the large lower leg bone ), Collision with car while on peda-cycle (pedal powered multi-person tour vehicles), Hypertension (high blood pressure), and Alcohol Dependence with Withdrawal (a chronic condition where the brain develops a physical need for alcohol to function).Record review of Minimum Data Set (MDS-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide services according to standards of clinical practice when it did not report and document a change of condition in a timely manner for one of eight sampled residents.This failure had the potential to delay interventions and treatments which could have affected Resident 1's health outcomes.Findings:Review of admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of femoral vein bilateral (thrombosis is the formation of a clot in a vessel, and an embolism occurs when part of that clot breaks off and travels to block another vessel), Acute Kidney Failure (the sudden loss of kidney function), Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy (a blockage in the urinary tract that stops or slows urine flow, causing urine to back up and potentially damage the kidneys, leading to symptoms like pain, swelling, frequent urination, and difficulty urinating), Hydronephrosis (the swelling of one or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required assistance with incontinent (loss of bowel and bladder control ) care, was provided care in a timely manner for one of four sampled residents (Resident 4) reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living- bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, toileting and eating) care. This failure resulted in not meeting Resident 4 ' s need for comfort and had the potential for further complications such as skin breakdown and infection. Findings: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including left fibula (the smaller of the two bones in the lower leg) fracture and type 2 diabetes with hyperglycemia (abnormal high blood sugar) according to the facility ' s admission Record. On 5/6/25 at 8:45 A.M. an unannounced onsite visit to the facility was conducted related to a complaint regarding lack of staff assistance with a resident ' s incontinent care. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician ' s order for a blood sugar fingerstick (a method of measuring blood sugar levels in the blood) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure and care plan for one of four sampled residents (Resident 4) reviewed. This failure had the potential to affect the delivery of care provided to Resident 4. Findings: On 4/30/25 at 8:45 A.M, an unannounced onsite visit at the facility was conducted related to the care of a resident with diabetes (too much sugar circulating in the blood). Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) according to the facility ' s admission Record. An interview was conducted with Resident 4 on 4/30/25 at 10:06 a.m. Resident 4 stated she had a diagnosis of diabetes and was checking her blood sugar twice a day when she was at home. Resident 4 stated her blood sugar was also checked when she was at the hospital. Resident 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not maintain a complete Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a medical form used to communicate a resident's wishes during a life-threatening emergency) for eight of 32 residents reviewed for complete and accurate medical records. (Residents 2,15, 45, 57, 58, 59, 245, 111) This failure did not provide an accurate representation of the care provided and had the potential to cause confusion amongst care providers. Findings: 1. Resident 2 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction ((disrupted blood flow to the brain) according to the facility's admission Record. 2. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of shaft left femur (long, central part of thigh bone) according to the facility's admission Records. 3. Resident 45 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of ten residents (19) observed during lunch in the dining room had a meal tray at the same time as the other residents. This failure had the potential to not provide and preserve Resident 19's dignity and respect. Findings. A review of Resident 19's undated admission Record indicated that Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (abnormal blood sugar) with Diabetic Neuropathy (a type of nerve damage that occurs with diabetes). During a dining room lunch observation on 4/14/25 at 11:42 A.M., residents were seated in their assigned areas in the dining room. There were three tables assigned for restorative feeding program (aims to help individuals regain or maintain their ability to eat independently). The fourth table was observed with two residents seated. Licensed Nurse 11 checked the meal ticket with the trays and then handed it to the restorative aides and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a nursing assessment tool) for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 134) reviewed for MDS accuracy. This deficient practice resulted in providing inaccurate information to the Federal database (information maintained by the federal government). Findings: Resident 134 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including cystitis (inflammation of the bladder) according to the facility's admission Record. During a review of Resident 134's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS, section O0100J1 indicated an x for dialysis (procedure done by a trained professional to remove wastes and excess fluids from the body). A review of Resident 134's physician's orders in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated no orders for dialysis treatments. An interview and observation was conducted with Resident 134 on 4/15/25 at 8:52 A.M. Resident 134 was in bed and stated she had irritation with frequent urination.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services to meet professional standards for two of 32 sampled residents when: 1. Resident 123's midline catheter (tube inserted in the upper arm with the tip located just below the armpit to allow access to the bloodstream for medications, fluids, blood draws, and other treatments) dressing was not changed and monitored. 2. The facility failed to provide a nutritional supplement in accordance with the resident's physician's orders. (Resident 2) This failure had the potential for complications related to intravenous (IV - method of delivering fluids, medications, or nutrients directly into the bloodstream through a vein) therapy and the potential for not meeting Resident 2's nutritional needs. Findings: 1. Per the facility's admission record, Resident 123 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia (lung infection). A review of Resident 123's physician's orders indicated, on 4/13/25 an order was made for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and reassess a change in condition (significant worsening of a resident's physical or mental health) for one sampled resident (303). This failure had the potential for complications related to Resident 303's health. Findings: Per the facility admission record, Resident 303 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease stage 3 (condition where the kidneys gradually lose their ability to filter waste products from the blood, leading to a buildup of toxins and other substances in the body). Per the facility progress notes, on 4/12/25 at 3:36 P.M., a potassium level of 5.6 (normal levels 3.5 and 5.5) was reported to the physician. The physician ordered to insert a peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter (a small, thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein to deliver fluids, medications, or blood products directly into the bloodstream). The IV was inserted into Resident 303's back of left hand. Per the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a stage four (bedsore extended to muscle, tendon or bone) pressure injury from developing after admission for one of three residents (Resident 15) reviewed for pressure injuries. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 15's quality of life. Findings: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of shaft left femur (long, central part of thigh bone) according to the facility's admission Records. During an observation on 4/14/25 at 9:09 A.M. Resident 15 was in bed with an air mattress and overbed trapeze. Resident 15 stated he was on air mattress due to a bedsore on his buttock. Resident 15 was pointing towards his buttocks area. A review of admission records for Resident 15 titled, 01. NURSING-ADMISSION/readmission EVALUATION/ASSESSMENT, dated 11/20/24 was conducted. The admission record indicated no pressure injuries. During an interview on 4/15/25 at 7:45 A.M. with Resident 15, Resident 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status by not providing a nutritional supplement for one of four residents (Resident 2) reviewed for nutrition and with a significant weight loss. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 2's unplanned weight loss which could lead to further decline in weight and overall health condition. Findings: Resident 2 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing) following cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain) according to the facility's admission Record). On 4/14/25 9:52 A.M. Resident 2 was observed in her bed watching TV. During interview Resident 2 did not respond verbally but nodded that she was okay. Resident 2 did not respond to further questions. During a review of Resident 2's physician's orders in the electronic medical record (EMR), the physician's orders indicated, .RNA dining program daily at lunch .Boost…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication was given as ordered by a physician for one of three residents (Resident 107) observed for medication administration. This failure had the potential for Resident 107's medical needs to be unmet. Findings: Resident 107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes (high blood sugar), according to the admission Record. Licensed Nurse (LN) 31 was observed preparing and administering medications to Resident 107 on Wednesday, 4/16/25, at 7:55 A.M. Resident 107 was given the following medications: benazepril (a blood pressure medication), empagliflozin (a diabetes medication), apixaban (a blood thinner), gabapentin (a medication to treat nerve pain), arginine (a supplement), ascorbic acid (a vitamin), aspirin (a blood thinner), ferrous sulfate (an iron supplement), multivitamin, and insulin glargine (a diabetes medication). A review of Resident 107's medical record was conducted on 4/16/25. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 8 residents (41) reviewed for psychotropics (drugs that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) had the proper indication for the use of an anti-anxiety medication (a drug used to treat symptoms of anxiety, such as feelings of fear, dread, uneasiness and muscle tightness that may occur as a reaction to stress). This failure resulted in Resident 41's continued use of an antipsychotic medication without proper indication and possible exposure to the medication's side effects. Findings: A review of Resident 41's undated admission Record indicated that Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Anxiety Disorder (feelings of worry, nervousness and fear) and Major Depressive Disorder (persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest in activities). An interview on 4/16/25 at 8:52 A.M., with Resident 41 was conducted. Resident 41 was seen lying in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure current infection control practices were followed when a facility employee touched the spout of beverage cartons upon opening the cartons during mealtime. This failure had the potential for cross contamination (spread of germs and bacteria) and infection. Findings: A dining room observation was conducted on 4/14/25 at 11:34 A.M. at the facility's south dining room. The dining room was observed with four round tables with numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4. The Restorative Nursing Assistants (RNA-a Certified Nurse Assistant who worked alongside rehab staff to provide exercises for residents with limited mobility) were at tables 1, 2 and 3. Table 4 had two residents who were waiting for their trays to be served. On 4/14/25 at 12:05 P.M. meal trays for the residents in table 4 were served by Licensed Nurse (LN) 11. LN 11 opened three small cartons of beverages using her bare forefinger to open the spout on the cartons. LN 11 then proceeded to feed one of the residents in table 4. An observation and interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify the attending physician and resident representative on four of five residents (Resident 2, 3, 5 and 7) reviewed for changes in condition when: 1. Resident 2 ' s representative was not notified of a wound deterioration. 2. Resident 3 ' s attending physician was not notified of a significant weight loss. 3. Resident 5 ' s attending physician was not notified of a significant weight loss. 4. Resident 7 ' s representative was not notified of a wound deterioration. These failures had the potential for a delay in care in treatment. In addition, the residents ' representatives were not aware of the change in condition. 1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (an impairment of brain function, such as memory loss and judgment) and muscle weakness according to the facility ' s admission Record. During an interview on 9/9/24 at 8:48 A.M. with Resident 2 ' s granddaughter, the granddaughter stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure one of three residents (Resident 2) reviewed for pressure ulcers (bedsore) received the necessary care and services to prevent worsening of the resident ' s pressure ulcer. This failure had the potential for infection and affect the resident ' s overall well-being. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (an impairment of brain function, such as memory loss and judgment) and muscle weakness according to the facility ' s admission Record. During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 7/9/24, section GG0170 A through E indicated Resident 2 was dependent on staff with rolling in bed, sit to lying, lying to sitting on side of bed, sit to stand and transfers. A review of Resident 2 ' s care plans was conducted. Resident 2 ' s skin care plan initiated on 7/2/24 indicated, .at risk for skin breakdown related to activity intolerance,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement transmission-based infection control measures when personal protective equipment (PPE, protective garments worn to prevent exposure to infection hazards) was not readily available for staff when entering the room of a resident (2) on transmission-based precautions (TBP, control measures put in place to prevent the spread of disease). This failure increased the risk of MRSA transmission to all susceptible residents, staff, and visitors at the facility. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of a sacral pressure ulcer (injury to the skin and tissue at the base of the spine), per the facility's admission Record. A review of Client 2's physician orders, dated 4/18/24, indicated Resident 2 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, intervention to decrease risk of disease transmission during resident contact that requires use of a gown and gloves) for a history of Methicillin-resistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the responsible party (RP) before changing a resident's room for one of two sampled residents (1). This failure created the risk of Resident 1's RP being unaware of Resident 1's location while attempting to visit. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the agency on 7/13/19 with diagnoses to include Hemiplegia (inability to move one side of the body). On 4/24/24 at 12:15 P.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 1's RP (RP 1). RP 1 stated, the facility had changed Resident 1's room multiple times and they did not always notify RP 1 that the room change had occurred. RP 1 further stated, that the facility did not notify her of Resident 1's latest room change on 4/23/24 until 4/24/24 at 10:23 A.M. On 4/24/24 at 12:35 P.M., an interview was conducted with Social Services (SS). SS stated, the facility notified RP 1 on the morning of 4/24/24 that Resident 1 had a room change the previous day. On 4/30/24 at 1:30 P.M., a telephone interview was conducted with the Director of Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code activities of daily living (ADL-basic daily tasks such as bathing, dressing, getting in and out of bed, walking, eating and toileting) in the MDS assessment (a clinical assessment tool) for one of one resident reviewed for MDS. (Resident 3) This deficient practice had the potential to not meet resident ' s needs for safety and well-being, as well as miscommunication among caregivers regarding Resident 3 ' s ADL plan of care. Findings: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia (inability to voluntarily move the lower parts of the body) and cervical spinal stenosis (narrowing of space inside the backbone putting pressure on the spinal cord and nerves) according to the facility ' s admission Record. Resident 3 was observed lying in bed on 2/20/24, at 10 A.M. with a blanket up to his chest and a call pad (used to call for staff assistance) was on top of the blanket. Resident 3 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive resident-centered care plans were developed and revised for two residents with stage four pressure ulcers (bedsores extended to muscle, tendon or bone). (Resident 1 and 4) These failures had the potential for these residents ' pressure ulcers to worsen and become infected. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stage four pressure ulcer of sacral region (the triangular shaped bone at the base of the back) according to the facility ' s admission Record. During an observation on 1/11/24, at 9:46 A.M., Resident 1 was in bed with eyes open but with no verbal response upon greeting. Resident 1 was observed on an air mattress with a wound vac (a device that helps heal the wound from the inside using a small pump which removed fluid and germs from the wound) hanging on the right side of the bed. At 11:05 A.M., Resident 1 was observed in a gurney with two Emergency Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update their care plan for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) with history of falls. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 ' s current fall prevention interventions to not be communicated to all health care providers. Findings. Resident 1 was admitted from the acute hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (A group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) and history of falls. During an interview on 10/25/23 at 10:20 A.M., with restorative nursing aide (RNA) 1, RNA 1 stated she saw Resident 1 on the floor in the dining room. RNA 1 stated Resident 1 tends to stand up and down in his wheelchair. An observation was conducted in the dining room on 10/25/23 at 10:30 A.M. Twelve residents were attending activities with two activity staff present. During an interview on 10/25/23 at 10:30 A.M., with Activity assistant (AA) 1, AA 1 stated she was in the dining room when Resident 1 fell.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a room change was documented in the medical record for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) reviewed for complete and accurate medical record. This failure had the potential to cause confusion amongst the healthcare team. Findings. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language , problem solving and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life) and history of falls , according to the Resident ' s 1 face sheet. During an interview on 10/25/23 at 10: 36 A.M., with licensed nurse (LN ) LN1, LN 1 stated the nurses had been placing Resident 1 in front of the nurse ' s station for close supervision due to Resident 1 ' s episode of trying to get out of the wheelchair unassisted. During an interview and joint record review of Resident 1's care plan on 10/25/23 at 5:00 P.M., with the Quality Assurance nurse (QA) QA nurse 1, QA nurse 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI- a systematic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and data-driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes)/ Quality Assurance (QA) Committee failed to identify areas of improvement related to resident falls. This failure put residents' safety at risk and increased the potential more falls would occur. Cross reference F689. Findings: On 9/26/23, a facility-provided list of residents who had falls from July 1, 2023 through September 26, 2023 was reviewed. The fall list indicated: July: thirty-two resident falls, two had injuries requiring hospital evaluation and/or treatment. August: twenty resident falls, two had injuries requiring hospital evaluation and/or treatment. September: thirty resident falls. On 10/4/23 at 3:10 P.M., an interview was conducted with the quality assurance nurse (QAN). The QAN stated the facility's QA committee met monthly and the QAPI met quarterly to discuss facility trends as identified through review of resident medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS is a nursing assessment tool) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 4) reviewed for MDS coding. This deficient practice will result in providing inaccurate information to the Federal database. Findings: Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis which included Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes uncontrollable movements) per the facility's Face Sheet. Resident 4 was discharged on 7/27/23 per nursing progress note. A review of Resident 4's Progress notes dated, 6/29/23 was conducted. This progress note indicated, .Resident reported fall incident with husband in the bathroom. Per resident report, she attempted to transfer for w/c (wheelchair) to toilet then lost her balance due to her inability to control muscle movement . A review of Resident 4's interdisciplinary team (IDT) progress notes dated, 6/30/23 was conducted. This progress note indicated, On 06/29/2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Resident 1 did not have a written care plan developed for their indwelling urinary catheter (tube inserted into the body to drain urine). 2. Resident 1's written care plan for activities of daily living (ADL, self-care activities like locomotion and getting dressed) was not implemented. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1's urinary catheter care to not be provided by staff which could lead to urinary tract infection. In addition, not providing the required level of assistance to Resident 1 during ADL had the potential for accidents to occur. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's facesheet and admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis (severe complication related to a current infection) and dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise one of three residents' (Resident 1) written care plan with clear, resident-specific interventions after the resident sustained a fall with injury on 8/17/23. In addition, a post fall rehab screening that had been recommended by the interdisciplinary team (IDT, a multi-disciplinary group) was not followed after Resident 1 fell. As a result, there was a potential for Resident 1 to experience more falls. Findings: A review Resident 1's facility admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a comprehensive assessment) dated 6/3/23, indicated the resident scored 02 on the brief interview of mental status (a score of 02 meant the resident had severe cognitive impairment). The same MDS assessment indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services necessary to ensure that one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) with an indwelling urinary catheter (tube inserted into the body to drain urine) had a clinical condition that demonstrated the need for the catheter. These failures had the potential to result in the unnecessary use of an indwelling urinary catheter or urinary tract infection(s). Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis (severe complication related to a current infection During a review of Resident 1's Admission/readmission Evaluation/Assessment dated 5/3/23, the assessment indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with a urinary indwelling catheter. There was no documentation found in Resident 1's medical record that showed the clinical indication or reason for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of Resident 1's Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe transport for one of 3 sampled residents (1). As a result, Resident 1 was dropped during transport and had to be evaluated at a hospital for injuries. Findings: During an unannounced visit on 10/11/23, at 9:10 A.M., the Quality Assurance Nurse (QAN) was interviewed. The QAN stated, on 10/4/23 it was reported to the facility that Resident 1 had been dropped during transport to dialysis (a treatment to clean the blood when the kidneys cannot). The QAN stated Resident 1 was evaluated for injury at the hospital after the incident. On 10/22/23, at 10:15 A.M., Resident 1 was interviewed. Resident 1 stated on 10/4 when he went to dialysis, he was dropped while being transferred off the gurney. Resident 1 stated it was because they only had one person transferring him, and it was supposed to be two people. Resident 1 stated he had to go to the hospital afterwards to be checked for injury. On 10/22/23, at 10:30 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the results of an abuse investigation were sent to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH, department that licenses and regulates nursing homes) within five business days. This failure resulted in the CDPH not knowing the outcome of the facility's investigation regarding the alleged abuse. Findings: On 8/7/23, CDPH received the facility's faxed Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse form, dated 8/7/23, which indicated the facility was reporting an allegation of physical abuse that occurred during Resident 1's care. On 8/18/23, an onsite visit was conducted to investigate the facility's report of alleged physical abuse of Resident 1. On 8/18/23 at 9:10 A.M., an interview was conducted with the facility's quality assurance nurse (QAN). The QAN stated the facility had reported an allegation of abuse related to Resident 1 on 8/7/23. The QAN stated the facility investigated the allegation and determined it was unsubstantiated. The QAN stated the facility did not report the results of their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-22 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently offer evening snacks to seven of 13 residents (Residents 34, 44, 61, 69, 79, 97, and 111), reviewed for Between Meal Snacks. This failure had the potential for residents to go to bed hungry. Findings: 1. Resident 79 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (stroke), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. Resident 79's BIMS (a cognitive assessment) score, dated 7/10/21, was 11 (score 8-11 indicates moderate impaired cognition). On 7/21/21 at 9:23 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 79 in his room. Resident 79 stated he was not offered any snacks in the evening, but he thought that was a good idea, because he would like to have something before he went to bed. 2. Resident 34 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hemiplegia affecting right dominate side (paralysis on one side of the body), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. Resident 34's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-22 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent prior to administering psychotropic medications (a medication which affects the mind) for two of three sampled residents reviewed for informed consents (54, 72). As a result, the residents may not have been fully informed of the risks and benefits of the psychotropic medications. Findings: 1. Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anxiety (a mental disorder characterized by excessive worrisome), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. Per facility's Physician Order, on 6/8/21 the physician wrote an order for Resident 54 for lorazepam (medication for anxiety) twice a day and every six hours as needed for anxiety and agitation (state of nervous excitement). 2. Resident 72 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anxiety (a mental disorder characterized by excessive worrisome), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. Per facility's Physician Order, on 6/30/21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-22 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a quarterly (every 92 days) MDS, assessment for one of two (26), reviewed for Resident Assessment, as required by Federal regulation 42 CFR 483.20 (d). This failure had the potential for Resident 26's ongoing clinical status to go unrecognized and unmonitored. Findings: Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included wedge compression fracture of the lumbar vertebra (fracture in the lower back), per the facility's annual MDS, dated [DATE]. On 7/21/21 at 3:31 P.M., an interview was conducted with the MDSN, regarding Resident 26's MDS data completion. The MDSN stated she would investigate the missing quarterly assessment and get back to me. On 7/22/21 at 8:35 A.M., the MDSN stated Resident 26's quarterly MDS was supposed to be completed in May 2021, and it was overlooked. The MDSN stated she normally printed out a list of all resident's monthly MDS required assessments and then complete the reports. The MDSN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-22 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents (69), reviewed for shower ADL care. As a result, there a was potential for Resident 69 to feel unclean and to have unidentified skin issues. Findings: Resident 69 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy (occurs when the nerves that control involuntary bodily functions are damaged), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. A review of Resident 69's MDS, dated [DATE], had a BIMS (a cognitive assessment) score of 15 (13-15 indicated cognitively intact). The ADL assessment indicated, Resident 69 needed one person assist with bathing. An interview was conducted on 7/20/21 at 10 A.M., Resident 69 stated she did not get her scheduled shower on 7/19/21. Resident 69 stated had scheduled shower with CNA 6. Resident 69 was informed by CNA 6 that she was the only CNA on the floor working and was unable to provide the scheduled shower. Resident 69…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of one sampled resident (211), received quality of care when the surgical sutures were not removed. This failure had the potential for Resident 211 to develop an infection post operatively due to not receiving continuity of care. Findings: Resident 211 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include surgical amputation of the right AKA and diabetes (abnormal blood sugar), per the facility's Resident's Face Sheet. On 7/20/21, a review of Resident 211's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 211's BIMS Score (test for cognitive function) was 14 out of 15, which indicated cognitively intact. On 7/21/21 at 11:03 A.M., a joint observation and interview with Resident 211 was conducted. Resident 211 was observed to have had a right AKA with seventeen (17) black sutures to the skin surface that were clean and dry without signs of infection. Resident 211 stated he had surgery in the middle of June 2021 and had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a pressure relieving mattress (LAL-low air loss) was programmed based on the resident's weight for one of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcer (18). This failure had the potential for Resident 18's Stage 3 pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss) on the sacral (in the lower back) region to worsen and develop complications. Findings: Resident 18 was admitted in the facility on 9/16/21, which included Stage 3 pressure ulcer of the sacral region, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. A review of Resident 18's MDS (an assessment tool), dated 4/27/21, indicated, Resident 18 had a BIMS (cognitive assessment) score of 00 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Section G (functional status), indicated, Resident 18 was totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living. On 7/19/21 at 9:12 A.M., Resident 18 was observed laying on an LAL mattress. The LAL relieving mattress was set for the body weight of 180 lbs. (pounds). On 7/21/21 at 9:36…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act upon the pharmacist's recommendation for the use of as needed psychotropic medication (a medication which affects the mind) for two of four sampled residents (44, 81) for unnecessary medication. This failure had the potential for missed opportunities to identify the use of unnecessary psychotropic medication for Resident 44 and 81. Findings: 1. Resident 81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Anxiety, per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. A review of Resident 81's medical record was conducted. Per the Physician Order Report, dated 6/26/20, Resident 81 may receive Alprazolam (a psychotropic medication used to relieve symptoms of anxiety) 0.5 mg one tablet three times a day PRN. There was no end date per the Federal regulation. Per the Medication Regimen Review Binder, dated 6/20 through 6/21, there was no documented evidence Resident 81's psychotropic medication was reviewed by the CP. On 7/22/21 at 1:16 P.M., a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the use of PRN psychotropic medication (a medication which affects the mind) was limited to 14 days for one of four sampled residents (44) reviewed for unnecessary medications. As a result, there was a potential risk for Resident 44 to have received an unnecessary medication. Findings: Resident 44 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anxiety, per the facility's Resident Face Sheet, Per the facility's Physician Order, on 12/11/20 the physician wrote an order for Resident 44 for a PRN psychotropic medication to treat anxiety (a mental disorder characterized by excessive worrisome). The end date read, Open Ended. On 7/22/21 at 1:16 P.M., a joint interview and record review of the CP's Recommendation Note was conducted with the CP. The CP stated psychotropic medications should not be ordered beyond 14 days. The CP stated the review of PRN psychotropic medication was important to ensure the medication use was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medications were secured in a shared bathroom when a medications were found in the a bag labeled for Resident's 69. This failure had a potential for other residents, visitors and unauthorized staff to have access to Resident 69's medications. Findings: Resident 69 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. A review of Resident 69's MDS, dated [DATE], had a BIMS (a cognitive assessment) score of 15 (13-15 indicated cognitively intact). On 7/19/21 at 8:56 A.M., an observation of Resident 69's shared bathroom was conducted. Inside the bathroom there was a blue plastic bag with several medication container labeled with Resident 69's name that were filled with pills. On 7/19/21 at 8:58 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the CM. The CM confirmed the medications found in the shared bathroom belonged to Resident 69. On 7/19/21 at 8:59 A.M., an interview with Resident 69…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain one of two freezers (stand alone) reviewed for kitchen sanitation. This failure had the potential for cross-contamination which could result in food-borne illness. Findings: On 7/19/21 at 8:14 A. M., during initial entrance of the kitchen, an observation was conducted with the RD, the RDC, and the DSSA, of the stand-alone freezer. Ice build-up was observed around the interior circumference of the freezer, from the top to the bottom. The freezer contained individual packaged servings of flavored ice cream. The freezer opened from the top with two doors. Multiple small brown and black particles were observed on top of the freezer door gaskets. Inside the freeze, on the base of the top left rack were dark debris items, estimated to be 1/2 inch in size, along with ice cream containers. The left, rear rack had an orange, gelatin like substance smeared on the back-side of the shelf. On 7/19/21 at 8:15 A.M., the RDC stated the freezer looked dirty and ice was built-up. The RDC used a knife to hit the ice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately document a shower provided for one of 24 sampled residents (69), reviewed for documentation. As a result, Resident 69's medical record contained inaccurate documentation. Findings: Resident 69 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy (occurs when the nerves that control involuntary bodily functions are damaged), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. A review of Resident 69's MDS, dated [DATE], had a BIMS (a cognitive assessment) score of 15 (13-15 indicated cognitively intact). The ADL assessment indicated, Resident 69 needed one person assist with bathing. An interview was conducted on 7/20/21 at 10 A.M., Resident 69 stated she did not get her scheduled shower on 7/19/21. Resident 69 stated she had a scheduled shower with CNA 6. Resident 69 was informed by CNA 6 that she was the only CNA on the floor working and was unable to provide the scheduled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (68) was treated with respect and dignity during meals, when a staff member stood above them while the resident was fed. This failure violated the resident's rights to be treated with respect and dignity. Findings: Resident 68 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included gastro-espohageal reflux disease (heartburn) per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. According to Resident 68's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) the resident's score was 0 (on a scale of 0 to 15, with 15 the most cognitively intact). On 3/6/19 at 8:33 A.M., LN 31 was observed assisting Resident 68 with her meal tray. Resident 68 was seated on her wheelchair and a folded chair was positioned against the wall. LN 31 was standing up and began giving Resident 68 a bite of food and stated, Come on Mama. LN 31 continued to give Resident 68 a bite of food in a standing position. On 3/6/19 at 8:40 A.M., LN 31…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 sampled residents (34, 27), were care planned for comfort and proper body alignment in bed. This had the potential to result in discomfort and a decline in range of motion. Findings: 1) Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included pressure ulcer (injury to the skin) and diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar in the body), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. A review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (standardized assessment of resident function) dated,12/10/2018, related to the resident Ability to Understand Others, was conducted. Resident 34 scored 1, on a 0 to 4 scale. (A score of 1, described a person who understood and comprehended most conversations). On 3/5/18 at 8:10 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 34. Resident 34 was observed in bed resting under a cover, and on top of a specialty low air-loss mattress (air mattress designed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer (injury to skin from prolonged pressure) for one of eight (284) sampled residents. This had the potential to contribute to Resident 284's development of pressure ulcers. Findings: Resident 284 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included amputation (surgical removal) of right toes, diabetes (blood sugar imbalance that may require medicine to correct) with foot ulcer, and peripheral vascular disease (blood circulation disorder) per the facility's Face Sheet. On 3/5/19 at 10:07 A.M., during an interview Resident 284's family member stated the resident had no skin issues when they left the hospital and arrived at facility, but now had pressure ulcers. The resident's family member stated Resident 284 would be moved to a wheelchair for lunch, stay in the dining room for activities and be left sitting up in the wheelchair for most of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident needs were addressed promptly when their call lights were answered for two residents interviewed on initial tour of the facility, and five of 12 residents from the confidential group interview. This failure had the potential to affect the physical and psychosocial well-being of these residents. Findings: Resident A had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 (on a scale of 0 to 15, with 15 the most cognitively intact), according to the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) assessment, dated 2/14/19. This MDS assessment also indicated Resident A was always continent of bowel and bladder, and required extensive assistance with toilet use and personal hygiene. During an interview with Resident A on 3/5/19 at 9:20 A.M., the resident stated it took an hour at times to have her needs met when she used the call light. Resident A stated she drank a lot of water and needed to urinate about three times during an eight-hour shift. Resident A stated, I have been drinking less water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow manufacturer's guidelines for keeping soup bowls hot when serving. As a result of this deficient practice, there was a potential for the soup bowls to not maintain there insulation properities which could affect the temperature of food placed inside the bowls. Findings: During a confidential group interview on 3/6/19 at 10 A.M., three of 12 residents stated the food was cold. Resident D stated, The food is good if it's not cold. Resident C stated, We get cold food. Especially soups are frequently cold. On 3/7/19 at 11:30 A.M., an observation was made in the facility's kitchen. DA 14 was pouring soup into soup bowls, covering with plastic lids, then placing the covered bowls on a tray. When the tray was full, DA 14 stacked a second layer of covered soup bowls on top. He repeated the procedure until there were 4 layers of soup bowls. DA 14 then took the tray of soup bowls and placed it in oven 1. DA 14 created another tray of soup bowls, this time with only 2 layers of soup bowls and placed them in oven…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to correctly label the resident's medical progress records for four of four sampled residents of Physician 1 (43, 68, 22, 24). This failure had the potential for the resident's medical information to be misplaced and not accessible to the healthcare providers when needed. Findings: Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included liver cancer, kidney failure, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 3/7/19 at 3:17 P.M., Resident 43's medical record was reviewed. The Doctor's Progress Notes dated 12/27/18 had no resident identifier written on the sheet of paper. On 3/7/19 at 3:21 PM, a joint interview and record review was conducted of Resident 43's medical record with the MRD. The MRD stated there should have been a resident identifier on all of the resident's documents in the medical record. The MRD acknowledged there was no resident name on the medical record and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$25,406 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $14,015 — penalty dated 2026-03-18
- $11,391 — penalty dated 2023-10-19
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-17 for 13 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUDSON RIVER OPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/05/2021 |
| BAY BRIDGE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/05/2021 |
| ORDONEZ, NELDA | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 11/01/2022 |
| BURRUP, PATRICK | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/06/2022 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056330. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.