City View Post Acute
1359 Pine Street, San Francisco, CA 94109 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 180 certified beds · (415) 673-8405 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $42,528 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-09)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.9% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.7% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.8% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.2% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.6% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.1% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.84 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.57 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 390 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 80.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 232 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.9%CMS range 51.3–62.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.0%CMS range 5.8–10.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 80.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 59.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 60.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 90.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.6%CMS range 3.7–8.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 171.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to sanitize food contact surfaces, store food, and maintain clean food equipment and kitchen environment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when:The chemical sanitizing dishmachine was used with low sanitizer strength;Food contact surfaces of food preparation equipment were not sanitized according to sanitizer manufacturer instructions;Refrigerators storing resident food were not clean;Juice machine parts were not clean;The kitchen floor was not maintained clean around the ice machine area;These failures had the potential to result in contamination of food and food utensils with inadequate sanitizing and attraction of pests leading to food related illness for 167 residents who ate food by mouth and received food from the kitchen and/or who could have perishable food brought in by outside sources such as visitors and stored for them in refrigerators. Findings:1.Review of the Policy and Procedure titled Sanitization dated 2001, showed dishmachines are operated according to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-01 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate maintenance and/or repair of: 1.Two refrigerators used for holding resident food which resulted in low refrigerator temperatures;2.An ice machine drainpipe which resulted in water actively dripping and pooling on the kitchen floor;3. Three drainpipes for an ice machine were not maintained clean; and4.A hotbox (food warming equipment) used to hold food for residents, which resulted in inadequate holding temperatures. The failure to maintain kitchen mechanical and electrical equipment had the potential to result in food and food equipment contamination from pests attracted to a wet environment, as well as not maintaining adequate food temperatures for 167 residents who ate food by mouth and who received food from the kitchen and/or who could have perishable food brought in by outside sources such as visitors and stored for them in refrigerators. Findings:1. Review of the guidelines shown on refrigerator/freezer temperature recording log titled Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Log showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for two of 34 sampled residents (Residents 194 and 114) when:1.a. A hand splint was applied without a physician's order; b. The facility failed to identify podiatry needs to maintain level of comfort and care plan was not developed to address resident's mycotic (long, thick and yellowish) toenails; and2. The facility did not follow the physician order for the administration of Tylenol.These deficient practices presented a potential risk of residents not maintaining the highest achievable level of wellbeing which could lead to diminished quality of life. 1.Resident 194 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included aphasia (a neurological disorder caused by brain damage that impairs a person's ability to communicate, affecting speech, writing, and comprehension of language), hemiplegia (a severe or complete paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness, numbness, or reduced motor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication rate did not exceed 5% for 2 of 9 sampled residents (Resident 139 and 199).1. For Resident 139, a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) administered the Resident's Nephro-Vite, a renal-specific multivitamin (vitamin C, B-Complex, & Folic Acid) formulated primarily for individuals with chronic kidney disease, not in accordance with the Physician's Order.2. For Resident 199, the LVN did not administer the Resident's metformin, a medication used to treat high blood sugar levels, as ordered by the physician.3. For Resident 199, the LVN did not administer the Resident's memantine, a medication used to treat memory loss, as ordered by the physician.4. For Resident 199, the LVN administered Resident's metoprolol succinate extended- release, a medication used to treat high blood pressure, after crushing the medication in contradiction to the manufacturer's specification.As a result, 4 errors were identified out of 29 opportunities for error during the observation of medication administration; the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff competency when:Two Diet Aides were not competent testing the dishmachine sanitizer;Three staff (one Diet Aide, one Cook, and the Dietary Manager) were not competent in 3-compartment sink procedures including testing the sanitizer strength and length of time for sanitizing items cleaned in the sink; andOne [NAME] was not competent testing the red bucket food contact surface sanitizer The failure to ensure staff competency for 6 out of 27 staff regarding use of the three-compartment sink and sanitizing tasks had the potential to result in contamination of food and/or utensils and equipment leading to illness caused by pathogens (any microorganism that causes disease).Findings:Review of the facility's job summary titled Dietary Supervisor signed on 10/21/2022, showed the Dietary Supervisor was responsible for overseeing the overall operation of the Food Services Department. The supervisor was to manage dietary staff, oversee meal preparation, and ensure compliance with all health and safety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the planned menu when incorrect serving sizes were given to residents on pureed diets. This failure had the potential to result in inadequate and/or inappropriate calories and nutrients served to residents leading to nutrient related medical complications for 20 residents who received pureed food from the kitchen. Findings: During an observation and interview on 4/27/2026 at 11:31 AM., the Dietary Manager (DM) provided a document titled Diet Spreadsheet, when he was asked for a copy of the spreadsheet used for trayline food service to indicate foods and serving sizes to serve for different prescribed diets. During an observation on 4/27/2026 at 11:45 AM, the kitchen staff prepared the trayline (an assembly line for food service) for the resident's lunch. The trayline included regular, pureed, standing and alternate meal selections, and therapeutic modified foods. As food was being plated by a Dietary [NAME] (Cook 3), Pureed (modified to a smooth consistency and holds its shape on a spoon) broccoli and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food at a palatable temperature. This failure had the potential for decreased food intake leading to nutrient related complications for 5 residents who received Chicken Noodle Soup from the kitchen. Findings:During an observation on 4/27/2026 at 11:45 AM, multiple individual plastic bowls with plastic lids on top were stored on a metal cart at room temperature prior to being placed on the resident trays.During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/27/2026 at 1:11 PM with the Dietary Manager (DM) and Registered Dietitian (RD), a test tray (the purpose of a test tray audit is to evaluate the quality of a meal during meal service) was conducted immediately after the last lunch tray was served to residents. Pureed and regular foods were tested. The food temperatures were measured with a calibrated (has been adjusted, checked, or marked to ensure it is accurate and matches a known standard) thermometer and the chicken noodle soup was 98 degrees F and did not feel warm in mouth when tested. During the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Gradual Dose Reductions (GDRs) were attempted for psychotropic medications (a group of drugs prescribed to affect the mind, emotions or behavior) for one of 5 sampled residents when Resident 9 continued to receive olanzapine (a type of psychotropic medication indicated for psychosis) and trazodone (a psychotropic medication used to promote sleep) without documented clinical contraindications to not attempting any GDRs. This failure resulted in the potential for unnecessary medication use and avoidable adverse effects.Clinical record review indicated Resident 9 was initially admitted to the facility from the acute care hospital in February 2025.Resident 9's admission diagnoses included schizophrenia, a mental health condition that affects a person's connection to reality, including how they think, feel, and behave.A review of Resident 9's acute hospital transfer documents, dated 2/10/25, indicated a Physician's Order for olanzapine 15 mg (milligram-unit of measure) at bedtime for mood disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) was completed for one of 34 sampled residents (Resident 194) after readmission.This failure had the potential for Resident 194 not to receive appropriate treatment and services.Resident 194 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included aphasia (a neurological disorder caused by brain damage that impairs a person's ability to communicate, affecting speech, writing, and comprehension of language), hemiplegia (a severe or complete paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness, numbness, or reduced motor function on one side of the body), hypertension (high blood pressure), and contracture (permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff).During an observation on 4/27/2026 at 10:45 AM, Resident 194 was sleeping in bed with blanket covering resident, receiving tube feeding (provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standard resident assessment tool) was accurately completed to reflect two of 34 sampled residents' (Resident 200 and Resident 10) skin condition when:1. Resident 200's Skin Conditions in the MDS was incorrectly coded as having no pressure injury (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence), and2. Resident 10's Skin Conditions in the MDS was coded as having stage 4 pressure injury instead of a surgical wound.This failure resulted in inaccurate data transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS, a federal agency that administers the nation's major healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid) system for quality measure and billing and had the potential for residents not to receive appropriate treatment and services.1. Resident 200 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included rhabdomyolysis (a rare muscle injury…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate Pre-admission Screening and Record Review (PASRR) for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 97) with a diagnosis of psychotic disorder (severe mental illness that cause individuals to lose touch with reality, characterized by hallucinations [false perceptions] and delusions [false beliefs]).This deficient practice could potentially result in Resident 97 not receiving specialized care and services appropriate for her condition.According to medicaid.gov, Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. PASRR requires that 1) all applicants to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility be evaluated for serious mental illness (SMI) and/or intellectual disability (ID); 2) be offered the most appropriate setting for their needs (in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care settings); and 3) receive the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan (BCP, an interim written plan implemented within 48 hours of admission that details the resident's immediate health and safety needs) to two of seven sampled residents (Resident 198 and Resident 197) or their representative.This failure could leave residents or their representatives not fully informed of the treatment plan and unable to participate in their care, putting them at risk for errors or unmet needs. 1. Resident 198 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection (an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) and Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities).During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/27/26 at 10:53 AM with Resident 198's Representative (RR) 1 and RR 2, RR 1 was talking to RR 2 on speakerphone. When asked if they received a written summary of Resident 198's BCP, RR 2 stated, No, nothing was given to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe resident environment for a census of 173 residents when Resident 147's Over The Counter (OTC) medications were left unsecured in an area accessible to other residents. This failure exposed residents to the risk of accidental ingestion and avoidable harm.During an observation of Resident 147's room on 4/28/26 at 9:46 AM, three bottles of OTC medications were observed on the resident's bedside table, which included folic acid (a synthetic form of vitamin B9), zinc (a mineral that supports immune health), and men's multivitamin (a combination of different vitamins and minerals in one pill). These medications were unsecured and accessible to other residents.During an interview on 4/28/26 at 12:05 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated that the resident had a habit of buying many OTC medications and supplements, and the facility treated them as the resident's personal belongings.During an observation of Resident 147's room on 4/28/26 at 12:10 PM, the DON entered the resident's room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were maintained for a census of 173 residents when non-controlled medications (medications with less risk of addiction and harm) were disposed of in a sharps container (a hard, puncture resistant box used to safely throw away items that can cut or poke someone, such as needles and syringes), which resulted in the improper disposal of medications.During an inspection of medication cart 3A on 4/27/26 at 9:43 AM, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6 was observed finding and placing two unidentified loose pills in the sharps container which was on the side of the medication cart.During an interview on 4/27/26 at 9:43 AM with the Nursing Unit Manager (NUM), the NUM stated that staff should have checked and properly dispose of unidentified loose tablets to reduce the risk of medication errors and drug diversion.During an interview on 4/29/26 at 10:58 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated that unidentified loose pills should not have been disposed of in the sharps container. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified, recommended, and followed up on necessary medication regimen changes for one of 5 sampled residents (Resident 9) when the facility did not address the need for a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) of olanzapine (a type of psychotropic medication indicated for psychosis) and trazodone (a psychotropic medication used to promote sleep) for Resident 9This failure resulted in Resident 9 receiving psychotropic medications (a group of drugs prescribed to affect the mind, emotions, or behavior) for over 14 months.Clinical record review indicated Resident 9 was initially admitted to the facility from the acute care hospital in February 2025.A review of Resident 9's acute hospital transfer documents, dated 2/10/25, indicated a Physician's Order for olanzapine 15 mg (milligram-unit of measure) at bedtime for mood disorder manifested by constant yelling and/or screaming and a Physician's Order for trazodone 50 mg at bedtime for insomnia (having trouble sleeping) manifested by an inability to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored according to the manufacturers' specifications for a census of 173, when:1. A bottle of brimonidine eye drops, an eye medication used to treat high pressure inside the eye, was stored in the medication refrigerator, which had the potential to result in medication degradation and reduce efficacy.2. An expired vial of insulin glargine, a medication used to lower blood sugar levels, was available for use in the medication cart which put Resident 12 at risk of receiving expired and ineffective medication. 1. During an inspection of the medication room on the third floor on 4/27/26 at 9:49 AM, a 10 ml (milliliter, unit of measure) vial of brimonidine 0.1% (percentage, unit of measure) eye drops was observed stored in the medication refrigerator at 38 degrees F (Fahrenheit, unit of measure).During an interview on 4/27/26 at 9:50 AM with the Nursing Unit Manager (NUM), the NUM stated that the eye drops should have been stored at room temperature. Furthermore, the NUM stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide: An entree of similar nutritive value to one resident (Resident 111) who chose not to eat the entree listed on the planned menu. The failure to provide substitute food of similar nutritive value to the food on the planned menu had the potential for a resident to receive inadequate nutrients.Meals that reflected Resident 150's preferences and failed to ensure adequate nutritional intake to reduce the resident's dependence on enteral feedings for one of one sampled residents (Resident 150). This failure resulted in ongoing inadequate meal consumption and repeated meal refusals, placing Resident 150 at risk for unintentional weight loss, nutritional decline, and continued reliance on tube feeding.1. Review of the Diet Spreadsheet Menu: [facility name] Fall/Winter Menu dated 2025/2026 Week 3 and used for lunch 4/27/26, showed a Regular textured, Consistent Carbohydrate diet (a diet typically prescribed to regulate blood sugar), received 1 square (3 inches by 2.5 inches) of Tater Tot Casserole.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 133 entered into a legally binding arbitration agreement only after fully understanding its terms. (Resident affected). The facility did not provide the required explanation of the agreement in a form and manner the resident could understand. This failure has the potential to result in residents signing legally binding documents without informed understanding of their rights, including the right to rescind or the fact that signing is not required to receive care.During a concurrent observation and interview on 05/01/2026 at 1:41 PM, in Resident 133's room, Resident 133 and Resident 133's friend (RF 1) were presented with a paper copy of the Arbitration Agreement that Resident 133 had signed on 04/09/2026. At that time, Resident 133 stated to RF 1 that they did not remember signing the Arbitration Agreement and did not know what the document was. RF 1 stated that Resident 133 does not have a good memory.During a concurrent interview and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control measures for one of 34 sampled residents (Resident 195) when Resident 195's urinary catheter tubing and urine drainage bag were touching the floor.This deficient practice placed Resident 195 at risk for transmission of infectious organisms from the floor to the urinary tract.Resident 195 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive decline in mental ability, including memory, reasoning, and behavior, severe enough to interfere with daily life) and urinary retention (the inability to fully or partially empty the bladder, causing urine to remain in the bladder even when one feels the need to urinate).During the initial tour observation on 4/27/2026 at 10:05 AM, Resident 195 was in bed, with a urinary catheter attached to an uncovered urine drainage bag, positioned under the bed and touching the floor.During a subsequent observation on 04/29/2026 at 1:02 PM, Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to prevent pests from entering the kitchen when there was a gap between one open window and the window screen. This failure had the potential for pests to enter the kitchen and contaminate food and food equipment and utensils.Findings: Review of the Policy and Procedure titled Maintenance Policies & Procedures Interior General Maintenance dated 12/31/2015, showed to replace or repair defective or bend screens or screens that do not fit securely into the frame. Review of the Policy and Procedure titled Pest Control dated 2001, showed windows are screened at all times. An observation in the kitchen on 4/27/26 at 10:05 a.m., showed a window was open and the window screen was not completely attached to the window frame creating a gap to the outside. During an observation and interview in the kitchen on 4/28/26 at 10:35 a.m., the Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed there was a gap between the open window and the window screen. DM stated he did not put in a work order to fix the screen because he did not notice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program when:Cockroaches were found in rooms [ROOM NUMBER].Staff complained of cockroaches in residents' rooms on the second floor.A resident reported seeing cockroaches in his room during a resident council meeting.This failure created an unsanitary environment for residents, staff, and visitors, and can contribute to the spread of infections and foodborne illnesses.During an observation on 12/4/25, at 2:29 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], a live cockroach was observed crawling on the floor and on top of the trash bin adjacent to Resident B's bed. Additionally, three dead cockroaches were found on the floor next to the nightstand. Furthermore, food particles and brownish discolorations were observed on the floor.During a concurrent interview on 12/4/25 at 2:31 PM, CNA 2 acknowledged the presence of live and dead cockroaches and stated, I have seen it before.During an interview on 12/4/25 at 2:32 PM, Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to safeguard the personal property for one of four sampled residents (Resident A) whose black pouch containing cash was reported missing on 11/10/25. Furthermore, the facility failed to update and document in the inventory of personal effects after a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) verified that Resident A had $1,000 in the missing pouch.These failures resulted in the loss of Resident A's cash, causing emotional distress, including feelings of distrust towards staff, tearfulness, and sadness.Review of Resident A's admission record indicated, was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (a condition where there's not enough oxygen or too much carbon dioxide in your body), recurrent major depressive disorder (also known as clinical depression, causes a persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities that you used to enjoy), generalized anxiety disorder (a mental health condition that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate Resident A's report of a missing black pouch with cash on 11/10/25. Furthermore, the facility did not take action after a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) verified that Resident A had $1,000 in the missing pouch.These failures resulted in the loss of Resident A's cash, causing emotional distress, including feelings of distrust towards staff, tearfulness, and sadness.Review of Resident A's admission record indicated, was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (a condition where there's not enough oxygen or too much carbon dioxide in your body), recurrent major depressive disorder (also known as clinical depression, causes a persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities that you used to enjoy), generalized anxiety disorder (a mental health condition that causes fear, a constant feeling of being overwhelmed and excessive worry about everyday things), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate when one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) was allowed to do so without the assessment and approval of the interdisciplinary team (facility staff members who coordinate the care provided to the residents). This failure had the potential to result in unsafe medication administration or omission of medications. Findings: Review of Resident 2's admission record indicated, Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure) and pulmonary embolism (occurs when a blood clot gets stuck in an artery in the lung, blocking blood flow to part of the lung). Review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 3/15/25 indicated Resident 2 had moderate cognitive impairment (a noticeable decline in thinking and learning abilities that significantly impacts daily life). During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's fingernails were not kept clean. This failure had the potential for Resident 1's fingernails to harbor germs and bacteria that could contribute to spread of infection. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/5/25 at 1:35 PM, Resident 1 was lying in bed, awake, with her hands placed on her chest. Resident 1 stated, You see my nails. They're nasty. No one comes here to clean my nails. I have been asking them to do it, no one does it. The underside of all of Resident 1's fingernails had black-colored matter. Resident 1 stated, I don't want my nails dirty. During a concurrent observation of Resident 1's fingernails and interview on 5/5/25 at 1:47 PM, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 stated, They're dirty. That's dirt under the nails. LVN 1 added, That could be an infection issue. We need to keep them clean to prevent infection. During an interview on 5/5/25 at 4:02 PM, The Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide needed care and treatment for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when: 1. The facility failed to provide a therapeutic environment conducive for sleep and address difficulty sleeping for Resident 1. 2. The facility failed to implement interventions for insomnia (persistent problems falling asleep and staying asleep), paranoia (excessive mistrust and suspicion of others) that could have contributed to the consistent yelling and screaming for Resident 2. The facility failure resulted to ongoing difficulty sleeping for Resident 1, and ongoing behavioral problems with Resident 2. Findings: a. A review of the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including squamous cell carcinoma of the anal skin (a type of cancer) and diabetes (abnormally high blood sugar level). During an interview on 4/9/25, at 1:05 PM, Resident 1 stated, It's difficult to sleep here because there is a person yelling and screaming constantly. If I ever get to sleep, I'll be awakened because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to refer the resident to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR evaluation after the resident was identified to have a newly evident mental illness diagnosis for 2 (Resident #56 and Resident #86) of 7 sample residents reviewed for preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR). Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Admissions Criteria, did not indicate the procedure staff should follow should a resident be diagnoses with a newly evidence or possible serious mental disability, intellectual disability, or a related condition. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #56 on 05/03/2016. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, constipation, and age-related osteoporosis. Per the admission Record, the resident received a diagnosis of psychotic disorder with delusions on 11/15/2021. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a new Level I screening was completed for 1 (Resident #37) of 7 sampled residents reviewed for preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR). Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, admission Criteria, specified, 9. All new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID), or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process. The policy specified, b. When/if the level I screen indicates that the individual may meet the criteria for a MD, ID, or RD, he or she is referred to the state PASARR representative by the system for the Level II (evaluation and determination) screening process. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #37 on 06/21/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history to include a diagnosis of schizophrenia. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/28/2024, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately reconcile post-discharge medications for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was discharged home with another resident's medication (Resident 2). This failure has the potential to result in a medication error after discharge if Resident 1 were to take medications that were not prescribed to them. Findings: A review of Resident 1's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated that Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a cognitive screening tool) score of 6 (scores of 0-7 suggests severe cognitive impairment, 9 to 12 suggests moderate cognitive impairment, and 13 to 15 suggest that cognition is intact). A review of Resident 1's discharge summary note, dated 09/11/24, indicated that that Resident 1 was discharged on 09/11/24 and Post Discharge Plan of Care form filled out and signed by patient. All medications and follow up appointments reviewed by patient. A review of Resident 1's Post-Discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the physician's order for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, a medical imaging procedure that uses a magnetic field and radio waves to take pictures of the body's internal parts) was not carried out timely. This failure caused a delay in provision of services and had the potential to negatively impact Resident 1's physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic pain syndrome (pain that lasts longer than three months). During an interview on 3/21/24 at 11:21 AM, Resident 1 stated, My legs hurt 24 hours a day. I'm in so much pain. I have had this (chronic pain) a long time, for several years . it burns, spasms from my ankles to my legs, to my hips. Resident 1 stated pain is severe most of the time. It starts from my feet, goes up to my legs, hits both knees. I have no idea what causes it.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prescribed medication was available to administer to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure created a risk for poor health outcome to Resident 1. Finding: Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems). During an interview on 5/17/24 at 11:23 AM, Resident 1 stated, I get short of breath, this is chronic . I've always had this because of my COPD. They (facility staff) know that. That's why I have inhaler. Review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, dated 11/1/23 to 4/30/24, indicated Trelegy Ellipta (also known as (fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, & vilanterol) Inhaler Aerosol (a substance released in very fine mist) Powder breath activated 200-62.5-25 mcg(micrograms)/actuation (delivery of a dose of medicine as a mist with the use of an inhaler [a small handheld device that delivers medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's care planning and implementation was communicated efficiently to the family when: 1.The son of Resident-A complained that the social worker (SW) did not return his calls on five different times. The complainant gave his telephone number, and texted the SW, but the SW never called back. 2. Resident -A's doctors' appointments were cancelled on 7/6/23 and 7/14/23 due to mismanagement of transportation arrangement by the facility. This failure resulted in the potential decline of Resident-A's clinical condition and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident A was admitted with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (also called an ischemic stroke - occurs as a disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it.), enterocolitis (an inflammation that occurs throughout the intestine) due to clostridium difficile (C-diff - is a germ that causes serious diarrhea and other problems. It can be caused by taking antibiotics), urinary tract infection (UTI- an illness in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1's nutritional needs are met when: 1) Resident 1 was ordered CCHO Diet (Controlled Carbohydrate Diet) since admission when Resident 1 is not a diabetic 2) Resident 1 had a poor appetite and a significant weight loss of almost 10 lbs. from 9/24/23 to 11/17/23. This failure had the potential to result in decline of Resident 1's clinical health, poor appetite, and psychosocial well-being, including avoidable significant weight loss of 9.5 lbs. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of: Burns involving 10-19% of body surface with 0% to 9% third degree burns (extend into the fat layer that lies beneath the dermis [third skin layer]), hyperkalemia (high potassium level in the blood), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) among others. The admission record or face sheet of Resident1 had no indication of diabetes mellitus as a diagnosis. During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, the minimum data set (MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident 1 who had no diagnosis of diabetes mellitus was free from unnecessary drugs and interventions when: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had an order for a sliding scale of insulin Lispro (a rapid acting human insulin analog that works parenterally to lower blood glucose by regulating the metabolism of carbohydrates, proteins, and fats.). Resident 1 received Lispro on 9/26/23 1 unit for blood glucose of 160, on 10/9/23 1 unit, on 10/10/3 1 unit, on 10/11/23 1 unit, . 2. Resident 1's blood glucose was checked three times a day from September 25 to October 20, 2023, with her blood glucose range from 112 to 188. This failure resulted in the mismanagement and monitoring of Resident1's drug/medication regimen that potentially caused the decline of the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of: burns…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
F 607 Develop/Implement Abuse /Neglect, etc. Policies Based on Interview and record review the facility failed to maintain and or implement the policies and procedure for Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Training when the facility could not produce documentation. Findings: Review on Clinical record of resident 5, dated 04/14/2023 at 06:30AM, by RN 1indicated there was a reported resident to resident physical abuse allegation from this resident ' s roommate to this resident approximately between 6:15am and 6:30am, Ombudsman and CDPH notified via phone at 8:15am. DON and administrator made aware. MD notified at 9:45am and resident is self-responsible. Resident was asked if she would like to go to the hospital, but she declined. Resident has no injuries, no c/o pain, and skin is intact. Resident ' s roommate was moved to a different room to suit both residents need, promote safety and prevent further incidents. During review of In-service Compliance Training Record- Patients ' rights, dated 4/07/2023, at 7:30am-8:30am, indicated that only 5 staff attended and at 2pm-3pm, indicated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to Develop and Implement comprehensive care plan for resident 4, when there was no evidence of documentation of a completed care plan that would identify the needs for supervision and risk elopement for altered mental status resident. Findings: During a review of resident Face sheet, (Resident 4) was admitted on [DATE], discharge date : [DATE] with a diagnoses of End stage Renal Disease, Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease with stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, or unspecified chronic kidney disease. Unspecified Dementia, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, unspecified hearing loss, Altered Mental Status. A review resident 4, Nurses progress notes, dated 4/10/2023 indicated, at 1500 the RN received a call from the resident ' s daughter in law asking if the resident is already back from the dialysis appointment. Informed the daughter in law that the resident is still in the dialysis per dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a discharge summary for Resident 1, when Resident 1 was sent home with no documentation where to discharge, no receiving responsible party teachings, no medications, no arrangements made for follow up care. This failure has the potential for Resident 1 not being cared for in the community, not able to adjust to new living situation. Findings: Review of admission Record, dated, 1/24/24, indicated, admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including : Fracture of the right tibia, Heart Failure( a heart condition caused by another medical condition that damages the heart),Epilepsy(a condition caused by irregular brain activity) Opioid Dependence (using habit forming drugs). Interview on 1/24/24 at 2PM, with SW (Social Worker), stated, on discharge process. not here yet that date Discharge process is, SW sets up transportation, set up discharge meeting with rehab team, nursing, SW, and Activities and arrange the discharge. Review of facility document,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to implement measures to relieve and prevent constipation in accordance with Physician ' s order and care plan for one Resident 1, when the patient experienced serious harm related to not having bowel movement for 4 days. Findings: Review of admission Record, dated, 1/24/24, indicated,admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including: Emphysema( fluids in the lungs), Urinary Tract Infection, Chronic Kidney Disease, Type 2 Diabetes ( high blood sugar levels). Review of MDS Section C, dated 9/10/23, indicated BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score is 13, no cognitive impairment. Review of MDS Section H, dated 9/10/23, Bowel and Bladder: 0100. Appliances A. Indwelling catheter H0400. Bowel Continence: 3- Always Incontinent H0500: Bowel Toileting Program : 0 – No toileting programcurrently being used to manage bowel incontinence. Review of progress notes, dated 12/1/23, 72 hr charting. Covid 19 Vaccine booster administered on left deltoid, no adverse reaction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide annual training to their staff on preventing and training to address, forms of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, exploitation and dementia management of one staff when Staff 1, did not receive annual abuse training . This failure resulted in Resident 1 was financially abused by Staff 1. Findings: Review of admission Record, dated, 1/25/24, indicated, admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Acute Kidney Failure(a condition which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids),Type 2 Diabetes (high blood sugar), Irritable Bowel Syndrome ( a condition with recurrent abdominal pain and diarrhea associated with stress, depression or anxiety). Review of Investigation Summary, dated ,11/22/23, indicated, on 11/17/23, resident ' s friend informed the Activity Director (AD), that a staff named Staff 1 from activities department was allegedly taking money from the resident .Licensed nurse was notified and went to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed: 1. To ensure one of six (6) sampled employees, (Certified Nurse Assistant CNA 1) was provided an in- service training on abuse before allowing to work. 2. To ensure the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) included the required components of abuse policy such as, Screening, Training, Prevention, Identification, and Protection. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively impact the care and services rendered to the residents. Findings: 1. In an interview on 11/9/23, at 5:16 PM, with the Nursing Supervisor (NS 1) and the DON 1, NS 1 stated, on 4/4/23, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) reported to the NS 1 that Resident 2 (roommate of Resident 1) alleged the CNA 1 of spanking Resident 1 while changing the resident's adult brief. The CNA 1 reported to the NS 1 that all she did was to turn the resident on her side and change the resident's adult brief, but Resident 2 said something different, she (CNA 1) was spanking the resident like a baby, and Resident 2 was upset. Record review of the April…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Investigate an allegation of abuse for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when the allegation of spanking the resident by a Certified Nurse Assistant, CNA 1) while changing the resident's adult brief. 2. Ensure one staff (CNA 1) was not allowed to return to work following the allegation of physical abuse. These deficient practices had the potential to place the resident's health and safety at risk and had the potential for further abuse to happen. Findings: 1.In an interview on 11/9/23, at 5:16 PM, with the Nursing Supervisor (NS 1) and the DON 1, NS 1 stated, on 4/4/23, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) reported to the NS 1 that Resident 2 (roommate of Resident 1) alleged the CNA 1 of spanking the resident 1 while changing the resident's adult brief. The CNA 1 reported to the NS 1 that all she did was, to turn the resident on her side, and change the adult brief but Resident 2 said something different, the CNA 1 was spanking the resident like a baby, and Resident 2 was upset. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) was accurately coded for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when, the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] incorrectly coded the presence of chronic ulceration (areas in the body where the underlying tissue damage has caused skin loss which shows no tendency to heal after three months of appropriate treatment) on the resident's legs. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the care and services rendered to the resident. Findings: Record review of the Annual MDS, dated [DATE] indicated, Section M1030 Number of Venous and Arterial Ulcers, the total number of venous ulcer present was 2. In an interview on 11/9/23, at 2:39 PM, with the Director of Nursing (DON 1), DON 1 stated, the resident has ulcerations of both legs and was receiving treatment. Review of the Care Plan titled, The resident has an actual impairment to skin integrity (multiple open wounds on both posterior lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide the needed care and services for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. One staff (LVN 2) failed to perform an observation and document the signs and symptoms of the resident's respiratory problem and failed to check the resident's Vital Signs (VS, include the body temperature, pulse rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation which are indicators of the person's health status) before the resident was sent to the emergency room (ER) on 8/12/23. 2. The nursing staff failed to notify the physician when the O2 sat (oxygen saturation, amount of oxygen circulating in the blood) level de-saturating below 50% and failed to obtain a physician' order to place a non-rebreather mask (NRM, oxygen supplementation device that is used to provide continuous oxygen flow. It consists of a mask, reservoir bag, and two or three one-way valves) on the resident. 3. The staff failed to obtain a physician's order to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided with the appropriate resident-centered treatment and care when: 1. Multiple skin discoloration on Resident 1's back observed on 6/28/23 did not have a follow-up assessment, evaluation, and appropriate interventions by the Wound Care Team (Clinicians who develops and implements wound prevention, skin management, and wound care). 2. The Weekly Skin Assessments (WSK, supposed to be documented on the Comprehensive Skin Evaluation/Assessment, CSEA) form were not done for the months of May and June 2023. For the month of July 2023, the WSKs were done only on 7/6/23 and on 7/14/23, not on a weekly basis, as per policy. 3. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk (BSPPSR, a tool to identify patients at-risk of forming pressure sores, injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure) was not completed on a quarterly basis after 2/28/23 and after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the competencies and skill to provide the nursing care and services for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when there was no assessment performed by a Registered Nurse to evaluate the resident when the resident's O2 sat (oxygen saturation, amount of oxygen circulating in the blood) level de-saturating below 50%. Resident 1 was sent out to the emergency room (ER) on 8/12/23. This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident's safety and well-being at risk of harm. Findings: Review of the Care Plan titled, At risk for Respiratory Complications due to shortness of breath on 8/10/23, the Goal was, will have effective gas exchange . and the Interventions were, assess signs and symptoms . Monitor for shortness of breath, irregular respiration . and inform physician promptly. Monitor vital signs . oxygen saturation . In an interview on 12/14/23, at 10:05 AM, with the Nursing Supervisor (LVN 4 (Licensed Vocational Nurse)/ NS 1), LVN 4/NS 1 stated, on 8/12/23 between 11:30 pm to 12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate the allegation of abuse for two of four sampled residents (Residents 2 and 3) after the facility was made aware of the allegation. This failure to thoroughly investigate the allegation of abuse had the potential to not ensure Residents 2 and 3 and other residents from possible abuse. Findings: Review of Resident 2 ' s clinical record indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (ESRD - occurs when the kidneys are no longer able to work at a level needed for day-to-day life) and diabetes mellitus (disease that result in too much sugar in the blood). Review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data set (MDS - resident assessment tool), dated 3/7/23, indicated, Resident 2 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident 3 ' s clinical record indicated, Resident 3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included ESRD and congestive heart failure (chronic condition in which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure doses of the medication was received and administered in a timely manner for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 74), when the routine doses of Amlodipine (medication use to treat high blood pressure) three (3) tablets were not delivered by the contracting Pharmacy to the facility and were not administered during Med Pass (term used to describe the process through which medication is administered to residents) as ordered on 10/19/21. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the health and well being of the resident. Findings: During Med Pass Observation on 10/19/21, at 7:47 AM, the Licensed Nurse (LN 1) stated, the Amlodipine tablets were missing in the Medication Cart. LN 1 went to the Medication Storage Room, searched the medication supply for Amlodipine bubble pack but did not find it. LN 1 stated it was last given yesterday (10/18/21) at 9:00 AM and she would call the Pharmacy to have the medication delivered. During a review of the October, 2021 Recap Physician's Order (PO), the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$42,528 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $42,528 — penalty dated 2024-01-09
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-07 for 22 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROVIDENCE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/30/2023 |
| RUSSELL, MATTHEW | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 05/01/2023 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/10/2021 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/10/2021 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/10/2021 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056203. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.