San Francisco Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 259 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 89.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 118 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.98 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 53 beds and averages 48.8 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.35 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.50 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow disinfection protocols for reusable items which includes durable medical equipment (DME - equipment that is used for a medical purpose, is used in the home, and is expected to last at least three years) for three out of three residents (Residents 18, 29, and 41). This failure puts residents at risk for cross contamination and the possible spread of infection among residents. Findings: During a continuous observation on 12/8/24 from 8:55 a.m. to 9:25 a.m. on unit B, with Registered Nurse 1, (RN1) was observed taking Resident 29's blood pressure, then Resident 41's blood pressure, and finally Resident 18's blood pressure. Each time, RN1 did not disinfect the blood pressure cuff prior to taking the residents' blood pressures. During an interview on 12/09/24 at 1:50 p.m., with RN1, she was unclear about the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) regarding disinfecting resident care equipment, and offered no explanation. RN1 stated she would have to check with the Director of Nursing (DON) & check the P&P.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement pain care plan for 1 of 14 sampled residents (Resident 38) when there was no evidence of pain assessment. This failure had the potential for not meeting Resident 38's nursing needs and goals to attain the resident's highest practicable well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 38's clinical record indicated, Resident 38 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur (broken left thigh bone), Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). Review of Resident 38's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool) dated 10/2/24 indicated, Resident 38 was cognitively intact. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/8/24 at 12:09 p.m., with Resident 38 in front of his room in hallway, he pointed to his abdomen while speaking in Chinese when asked if he had a pain. During a concurrent interview and record review on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality when the facility did not follow doctor's order regarding oxygen for one of 2 sampled residents (Resident 8). This failure could potentially result in negative outcomes for Resident 8. Findings: Review of Resident 8's clinical record indicated, Resident 8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including spinal stenosis (the spaces inside the bones of the spine get too small), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a serious medical condition that occurs when there is not enough oxygen in the body's tissues), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease that makes breathing hard), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool) dated 11/16/24 indicated, Resident 8 was cognitively moderately impaired. Review of Resident 8's H&P (history and physical, a formal assessment of a resident that includes a review of their medical history, a physical exam, and a summary of any tests) dated 11/14/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure communication services were provided for one of 6 sampled residents (Resident 38) who spoke in his native language when there were no interpreter services for Resident 38 on Sunday (12/8/24). This failure has the potential for Resident 38 not to understand and carry out activities of daily living (ADL) to attain the resident's highest practicable well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 38's clinical record indicated, Resident 38 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur (broken left thigh bone), Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). Review of Resident 38's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool) dated 10/2/24 indicated, Resident 38 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 12/8/24 at 11:58 a.m., with Son of Resident 38 via phone, Son stated, Resident 38 speaks Cantonese, Mandarin, and Chinese…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 25 was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. These drugs include, but are not limited to, drugs in the following categories: (i) Anti-psychotic [a type of psychiatric medication which are available on prescription to treat psychosis]; (ii) Anti-depressant [prescription medicines to treat depression]; (iii) Anti-anxiety [drugs used to treat symptoms of anxiety, such as feelings of fear, dread, uneasiness, and muscle tightness, that may occur as a reaction to stress]; and (iv) Hypnotic [a class of drugs that induce or prolong sleep in people with sleep disorders and are intended to improve the overall quality of sleep]) when: 1.There was no evidence of non-pharmacological intervention for Aripiprazole (antipsychotic), Bupropion (antidepressant), Lorazepam (antianxiety), and Mirtazapine (antidepressant) for Resident 25 2. There was no targeted behavior of Lorazepam for Resident 25. 3. There was no evidence of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide, one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), Resident 1's representative with the 7-Day Bed-hold written notice at the time of transfer or within 24 hours of Resident 1's emergency transfer to a higher level of care on [DATE]. This failure resulted in a facility-initiated discharge on [DATE] for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Summary for Providers, the Summary indicated that Resident 1 had an emergency transfer to the hospital on [DATE], due to a change of condition (COC). During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (FS), the FS indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE] (7 days after an emergency transfer due to a COC). During a concurrent interview and record review on [DATE] at 4:20 PM with Executive Assistant (EA), the EA was unable to locate documented evidence to show Resident 1's representative was provided with the 7-Day Bed-hold written notice at the time of transfer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-10-06 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to have a full-time, qualified, and competent person to supervise food and nutrition services when: 1. The registered dietitian (RD) and the qualified dietary supervisor were at the facility less than full-time defined as 35 hours per week; 2. Food and Nutrition Services (FNS) supervisory staff did not ensure: a resident received food preferences; FNS staff were competent to carry out job duties and tasks they performed; the planned menu was followed; a resident received the appropriate texture food according to the diet order; there was an effective system to maintain food and nutrition services in a safe and sanitary manner; and the kitchen was pest free; and 3. The dietary supervisor did not ensure chicken potstickers were cooked to an appropriate temperature. These failures had the potential to compromise the safety and nutritional status of residents through the potential transmission of foodborne illness, the provision of inadequate nutrients, the provision of food texture that did not meet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-10-06 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the competency of Food and Nutrition Staff when: 1. A cook did not know the steps for cooling Time Temperature Control for Safety (TCS, foods more likely to grow harmful bacteria and/or microorganisms if not stored appropriately) food; 2. A cook did not follow recipes when preparing food for the planned menu; 3. A diet aide did not know how long to submerge items in the sanitizer solution when washing manually using the 2-compartment sink; 4. A diet aide did not follow manufacturer's instructions for a sanitizer test strip when testing the surface sanitizer. These failures had the potential to compromise the safety and nutritional status of residents through the transmission of foodborne illness and the provision of inadequate nutrients and/or decreased quality of food for 51 residents who received food from the kitchen out of a census of 51. Findings: 1. Review of the Cooldown Temperature Log dated October 2023, showed instructions which read Food must be cooled from 140 degrees Fahrenheit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-10-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the planned menu when: 1) The incorrect serving size of the main entrée was served according to the menu for a lunch meal; 2) Pureed melon was not served according to the menu for a lunch meal. 3) Pureed salad was not served according to the menu for a lunch meal. 4 ) Fresh strawberry and ice cream were not served according to the menu for a lunch meal. This failure to follow the planned menu had the potential to result in residents not receiving the nutrients the menu was intended to provide leading to decreased nutrient intake and further compromising residents' medical status for 51 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: Review of the policy and procedure titled Menus revised October 2017, showed menus are developed and prepared following established national guidelines for nutritional adequacy. Menus meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with the recommended dietary allowances of the Food and Nutrition Board. The dietitian reviews and approves all menus. Menus…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety requirements in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. Staff did not ensure food was cooled safely. 2. Pans and bowls were not dried appropriately. 3. Frying pans were in poor condition. 4. A large mixer was not clean and in poor condition. 5. An industrial can opener was not clean and in poor condition. 6. Refrigerator and Freezer door rubber gaskets (a rubber strip surrounding the perimeter of the inside of the cooler door to seal the door when it is closed so air cannot go in or out) were not clean. 7. Staff did not handle clean dishes appropriately to prevent contamination of the dishes. 8. There was no airgap (a gap between the sink drains and the drain that leads to sewage drain. This gap prevents a back-up of non-potable water and/or bacteria into the sink) for the food preparation sink drain. 9. Nursing staff who monitored food refrigerator temperatures did not know appropriate refrigerator temperatures to store food safely. 10. Refrigerated food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $745K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA