All Saint's Subacute & Transitional Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 63.3 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.07 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.70 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.69 to 1.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, Facility 2 failed to follow infection control practices to prevent the spread of infection in Facility 2 when the following were identified: 1. Facility 2 did not follow the recommendations to stop the spread of infection as outlined by the local public health department (LPHD). The recommendations were as follows: a.Close Facility 2 to new admissions and halt movement of residents from other buildings to the facility . b.Submission of adherence monitoring logs for hand hygiene, PPE (personal protective equipment, any piece of clothing or equipment that ' s worn by the employees to minimize exposure to biological, chemical, or any physical hazards on work site) use, and environmental cleaning at weekly intervals and contact precaution (infection control measures used to prevent the spread of infectious diseases that are transmitted through direct contact with an infected person or their contaminated environment) and hand hygiene observations of staff to 50 per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of five sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) for tracheostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening through the front of the neck directly into the trachea [windpipe]) care when:1. Resident 1 did not have a physician order for tracheostomy suctioning (a sterile procedure that uses a flexible catheter inserted through the tracheostomy to mechanically clear excess mucus or secretions from the trachea [a critical tube that connects voice box to lungs]) as indicated in Resident 1's care plan, and the facility did not have time-specific documentation demonstrating when the tracheostomy suctioning was provided to Resident 1. 2. Resident 2's manual resuscitator bag (also known as bag-valve-mask, is a hand-held device used in emergencies to provide manual, positive pressure ventilation to patients who are not breathing adequately) maintained at the bedside for emergency respiratory use, was stored unlabeled and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the implementation of hydration monitoring for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1's intake (I, fluid consumed) and (&) output (O, fluid excreted) monitoring during the PM shift (7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) was not maintained and the total 24-hour I&O (it is the clinical window used to evaluate fluid balance and it sums all fluid consumed against all fluid excreted over the preceding 24 hours to track trends and detect dehydration [loss of fluid] or fluid overload [too much fluid in the body]) was not calculated on 6/15/26, to evaluate Resident 1's overall fluid balance and hydration status.This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at risk for delayed identification of changes in fluid balance, including dehydration or fluid overload, and delayed implementation of appropriate interventions.During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 6/23/26, AR indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility in March 2015, with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete clinical documentation for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when the licensed nurse documented that medications were administered to Resident 1 on 6/16/26 at 5:00 a.m., the medications administration were not documented on Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR- It is the official clinical record log that nurses and caregivers use to document what prescribed medication a patient receives, the dosage, the time it was administered, and the route).This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1's inaccurate and incomplete clinical record, which could affect Resident 1's ongoing clinical assessment, treatment decisions, and continuity of care.During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 6/23/26, AR indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility in March 2015, with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury (TBI, a disruption in normal brain function caused by an outside physical force), post traumatic seizures (abnormal electrical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to its infection control policies for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) when housekeeper (HK 1) entered and cleaned Resident 3's room without wearing the required isolation gown (protective barrier to prevent the transfer of germs between patients and staff) while Resident 3 was on contact isolation precautions (safety measure to wear gloves and gown when in contact with an infected resident, surfaces or equipment) for MRSA (methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, bacteria that does not respond to antibiotics) associated wounds to the left foot and left leg, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and transmission of healthcare-associated infections. This failure exposed residents and staff to potential cross-contamination and increased risk of transmission of infectious organisms.Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, indicated Resident 3 was admitted in the facility on 11/18/24, with diagnoses of Tracheostomy (a surgically created hole in the neck…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to meet professional standards of quality for one of three sampled Residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 did not have their blood sugar level checked and/or received Insulin [medication for Diabetes Mellitus (DM - a chronic condition where the body cannot properly manage sugar in the blood leading to high levels that can damage organs)] as ordered by their physician. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience life-threatening emergencies as well as severe organ damage.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 12/15/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 with multiple diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) and Gastrostomy Status (indicates a feeding tube (G-tube) placed directly into stomach through the abdominal wall used for long-term feeding, fluids, or medicine when a patient cannot eat enough by mouth).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS- a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures for two of six sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2 ) when the following was observed: 1. House Keeper (HK) 1 was seen inside Resident 1's room who was on Contact Precaution (extra safety steps healthcare workers take to stop spread of germs) without Personal Protective Equipment (PPE- clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) and did not perform hand hygiene after exiting Resident 1's room.2. Registered Nurse (RN) 1 did not wear PPE or wash their hands after giving a subcutaneous (medication delivered through injection under the skin) injection to Resident 1.3. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 emptied Resident 2's urinary drainage bag with gloved hands and exited Resident 2's room without removing gloves or performing hand hygiene. These failures had the potential to spread infections among residents at the facility.1.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan (a document that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment) for four of six sampled residents (Residents 11, 12, 15, and 31), when Residents 11, 12, 15, and 31 did not have a care plan to address their antibiotic-resistant infection called Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms (CPO, are bacteria that are resistant to a class of antibiotics called carbapenems which are typically used as a of last-line treatment for serious infections) specific to enzyme New Delhi [NAME]-ß-lactamase (NDM, an enzyme that makes bacteria resistant to a broad range of antibiotics including the carbapenem family). This failure had the potential for Residents 11,12, 15. And 31 to not receive person-centered appropriate care, monitoring, and treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 11 '…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability of a controlled substance (substances that have an accepted medical use, medications which fall under US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Schedules II-V, and have a potential for abuse, ranging from low to high, and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence) when: 1. During a random controlled medication use audit, two of two randomly sampled residents (Resident 49 and Resident 15) did not have all administered medications correctly documented on the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medication) and on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to indicate they were administered to the resident. This failure had the potential to result in misuse or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to make it more difficult to monitor if medication dosages need to be adjusted. 2. The medication cart was observed to be unlocked on two occasions. This failure had the potential to result in residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and label mediations in accordance with manufacturer specifications and currently accepted professional principles when: 1. Two containers of acetylcysteine (a medication used to break up mucus in people with lung disease) were not labeled with an open date. 2. An unopened insulin pen was stored in the medication cart. 3. Four bottles of eyedrops were not correctly labeled with a patient identifier. 4. Oral (taken by mouth) medications were stored in the same compartment in the medication cart as eye drops. These failures had the potential to result in eight residents potentially receiving an incorrect or expired medication. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 11:45 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, there were two open containers of acetylcysteine for Resident 18 and 23 in the medication refrigerator that did not have an open date. LVN 2 confirmed there was no open date or time and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff were competent regarding job duties when: 1. A cook did not know the appropriate method for calibrating the thermometer. 2. A dietary aide did not demonstrate appropriate procedures for testing the sanitizer on the dish machine. 3. Kitchen staff did not know the appropriate sanitizer for sanitizing food contact surfaces. This failure had the potential to result in contamination of kitchen equipment and/or utensils leading to food borne illness caused by pathogens (harmful organisms) for 22 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/11/24 at 9:45 a.m. with [NAME] in the kitchen, [NAME] stated she was responsible for the food thermometer's calibration to ensure accuracy. [NAME] showed how to calibrate the food thermometer by filling a stainless cup with cold water and ice cubes, then she added hot water. She inserted the stem of the thermometer into the contents of the stainless cup. [NAME] stated the thermometer stem would…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$163,127 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $30,933 — penalty dated 2025-08-22
• $132,194 — penalty dated 2025-03-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $786K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA