Santa Rosa Post Acute
4650 Hoen Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA 95405 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (707) 546-0471 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $10,166 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-28)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.1% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.6% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.7% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.6% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.7% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.5% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.06 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.98 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 271 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 86.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 137 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.2%CMS range 52.6–64.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.5%CMS range 5.7–11.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 86.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 86.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 69.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 94.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.1%CMS range 3.8–8.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 96.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-01-28 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide resident-centered care to one resident (Resident 1) of four sampled residents when Licensed Nurses administered Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR, an emergency procedure consisting of chest compressions combined with artificial breathing in an effort to manually preserve brain function to restore blood circulation and breathing in a person whose heart unexpectedly stops beating) against Resident 1 ' s decision not to be resuscitated (rescued). This failure resulted in physical, psychosocial (involving both psychological and social aspects), and financial harm to Resident 1 after she had survived the medical emergency. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated an initial admission to the facility on [DATE]. The admission record also indicated Resident 1 was her own responsible party (a person in charge of making healthcare decisions). A review of Resident 1 ' s Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe smoking environment for six out of six sample residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, and Resident 6) when:The outside environment accessible to residents was not free from hazards and the door to the maintenance shed was left open and unattended,Adequate supervision was not provided in the smoking section and safe measures were not monitored for the extinguishing of cigarettes, andSmoking care plans were not initiated for Resident 4 and Resident 6.These deficiencies increased the risk of fire hazards and resident exposure to hazardous materials. Additionally, insufficient supervision led to an incident of resident-to-resident abuse and raised other safety concerns such as limited access to assistance, burns, fires, falls, wandering, elopement, exposure to or acquisition of external resources (including contraband), and trespassing. These failures also resulted in unmet care needs and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of six sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) were protected from abuse and remained free from abuse when:A physical altercation occurred between Resident 1 and Resident 2 during which Resident 2 hit Resident 1 on the face,72-hour monitoring was not completed for Resident 1 and Resident 2 following the change of condition (COC), and;Immediate corrective actions were not implemented.This failure presented a risk of harm to Resident 1 and may have resulted in additional abuse or complications affecting both Resident 1 and Resident 2 after their COC. Cross reference F689. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility in April 2020 with medical diagnosis which included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) following a cerebrovascular disease (conditions that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident 1) of two sampled residents from physical abuse when Resident 2 bit Resident 1 on the hand.This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure residents did not experience abuse.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated admission to the facility in November 2025 with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, difficulty walking, and morbid obesity. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 12/30/25 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated no memory impairment.A review of Resident 2's admission record indicated admission to the facility in December 2025 with diagnoses which included vascular dementia and anxiety disorder. A review of Resident 2's MDS dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS score of 1 which indicated severe memory impairment.A review of Resident 1's Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (SBAR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2) failed to ensure one resident's (Resident 1) right to communication of three sampled residents, when LN 2 did not use a language interpreter to communicate with Resident 1.This failure decreased the facility's potential to support self-determination and the right to a dignified existence among residents.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated admission to the facility on 4/23/25 with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM- a chronic condition in which the body has difficulty in controlling blood sugar levels). This admission record also indicated Resident 1's primary language was Spanish and that he was his own Responsible Party (a person who is able to make healthcare and financial decisions).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 8/5/25 indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated Resident 1 had moderate impairment to his ability to process knowledge and understanding.In an interview in the facility conference…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, licensed nurses (LNs) did not provide accurate and safe pharmaceutical services to one resident (Resident 1) of three samples residents when:LNs did not ensure Resident 1 had a physician's order for glucagon (emergency treatment injected into a large muscle using a needle to immediately raise blood sugar levels) after Resident 1 had four episodes of hypoglycemia (when a person's blood sugar level drops below 70 milligrams per deciliter [mg/dl, a unit of measurement]) between 7/4/25 and 11/1/25;LN 2 administered insulin (a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication) to Resident 1 at 11:30 a.m. when it was supposed to be administered at 6:30 a.m.;LN 2 did not ensure accurate documentation in Resident 1's medical chart when: LN 1 documented insulin was administered at 11:07 a.m. and it was scheduled at 6:30 a.m., LN 2 did not document Resident 1's blood glucose level of 434 mg/dl (a normal range is 80 mg/dl to 130 mg/dl), and there was no documented evidence that the physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete performance reviews (formal meetings where a supervisor evaluates an employee's job performance, providing feedback and setting goals for the future) for more than 12 months for three out of three randomly selected Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs also known as nurse aides).This failure can prevent identification of skill gaps leading to decline in quality of care. Findings:During a concurrent interview and records review of competency evaluations of five randomly selected staff on 9/12/2025 at 11:18 AM, the DSD confirmed the most recent performance evaluations were more than a year ago as follows:1. CNA Q's last competency was on 4/2/23,2. CNA R's last competency was 4/1/23 3. CNA S' last competency was 4/1/23The DSD stated staff competency reviews should be conducted annually so that staff remain competent and able to provide proper care for the residents. During a review of the State Operations Manual (SOM) Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities revision 232, Issued on 7/23/25, Code…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — patternEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff members possessed the basic competencies and skills sets to meet the behavioral health needs of residents with mental disorders and those with a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event) as reflected in the facility assessment, when: 1. 12 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs - also known as nurse aides) did not receive training related to the care of residents with dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), 2. CNA D was allowed to start work without a competency check (a process that evaluates an individual's knowledge, skills, and abilities to perform a specific role or task effectively) completed, and3. 32 CNAs did not receive training related to the care of residents with a history of trauma and/or PTSD. These failures could result in an inability to provide quality care to residents with mental disorders and a history of trauma.Findings: During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and stored in a safe and sanitary manner for a census of 98 residents who received food prepared from the kitchen, when:1. Four containers of spices past their use-by date labels were found available for use on the kitchen shelf;2. Staff cleaning dishes touched cleaned dishes with dirty gloves;3. Dish machine sanitizing solution was not at the required concentration levels.These failures decreased the facility's potential to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/9/25 at 11:17 a.m. with the [NAME] (CK 1) in the kitchen, four containers of spices were observed on the kitchen shelf past use by dates (Ground Nutmeg with use-by date of 7/27/25, Rubbed Sage with use-by date of 7/5/25, Ground [NAME] with use-by date of 7/5/25, and Poultry Seasoning with use by-date of 8/24/25). CK 1 confirmed that the spices had expired. During an interview on 9/11/25 at 2:54…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure they had an effective pest control program for all residents of the facility when there were flies inside the facility.This failure put the residents at risk for the possible spread of infections.Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure they had an effective pest control program for all residents of the facility when there were flies inside the facility.This failure put the residents at risk for the possible spread of infections.Findings:During an interview on 09/09/2025 at 12:07 PM, Resident 82 had a fly hovering around her food but landed on her blanket. Resident 82 stated there had been a lot of flies in the facility which upset her because she thought flies were unsanitary, especially when they land on food. Resident 82 stated whatever the facility was doing to eliminate the flies were not effective. During an observation on 9/9/25 at 2:36 P.M., 2 flies were flying around Resident 73 and both ultimately landed on his blanket.During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a written summary of the baseline care plan (BCP, a document created within 48 hours of a resident's admission, outlining the initial care needed, focusing on basic needs and resident-specific information) was provided to the resident and/or the responsible party (RP, a person who is designated in making decisions about health care and financial matters) for two out of five sampled residents (Residents 31 and Resident 82) when no documented evidence that the BCP summary was provided.This failure could compromise residents' safety, hinder effective communication, and could lead to adverse events, especially during the critical initial days of admission.Findings: A review of Resident 31's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date of 7/2025 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) and muscle weakness.A review of Resident 31s Baseline Care Plan Person-Centered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of twenty sampled residents (Resident 28) was provided the Restorative Nursing Assistant Program (RNA-P, a program which provides exercise and a range of motion activities to the residents), when Resident 28's physician's orders, person-centered care plan, and resident's choice to participate in the RNA-P was not being followed.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 28's decline in physical abilities and decreased muscle strength.Findings:A review of Resident 28's admission record indicated he was originally admitted to the facility in November 2023 with diagnoses including lung disease and the absence of right leg, below the knee. A review of Resident 28's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool), dated 8/22/25, indicated Resident 28 had an ability to express ideas and wants.A review of Resident 28's Care Plan Report, dated 12/8/23 with no resolved date, titled Restorative Nursing- Range of Motion indicated, RNA PROGRAM FOR AROM [active range of motion] BUE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate pain relief for one out of 20 sampled residents (Resident 45), when using a numeric pain rating scale where 0 as no pain, 1 to 3 as mild pain, 4 to 6 as moderate pain, and 7 to 10 as severe pain, Resident 45 complained of moderate to severe pain daily.This failure resulted in Resident 45 feeling frustrated and complaining of lack of quality of life.Findings:A review of Resident 45's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date in June 2025 with a diagnosis of fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur (a break in the part of the left thigh bone just below the hip joint) and pain due to internal orthopedic prosthetic devices (an artificial replacement part for the body), implants (devices or tissues that are placed inside or in the body) and grafts (skin or bone cut from one part of a person's body or other source and used to repair a damaged part).A review of Resident 45's Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident out of 20 sampled residents (Resident 87) was provided with a safe and sanitary environment when the commode (portable toilet designed for individuals with limited mobility) was covered with a blanket.This failure has the potential to spread germs and cause illness among residents.Findings:A review of Resident 87's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date to the facility in July 2025 with a diagnoses of muscle weakness and difficulty walking.During a concurrent observation and interview on 09/09/2025 at 12:34 PM, in Resident 87's room, a commode was covered with a blanket. Resident 87 stated staff have used a blanket to cover the commode for about two months.During a concurrent observation and interview on 09/09/2025 at 1:18 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) C verified Resident 87's commode bucket was covered with a blanket. LN C verified the commode had always been covered that way. LN C stated it was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the call light (a communication tool used in healthcare settings to allow patients to request assistance from staff) was within reach for one out of five sampled residents (Resident 102), when her call light was found coiled around her lower bed post away from her reach.This failure put Resident 102 at risk for delayed provision of care and accidents.Findings:A review of Resident 102's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission to the facility in April 2020 with a diagnosis of hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body).During a concurrent observation and interview on 09/09/2025 at 11:47 AM, in Resident 102's room, Resident 102's stated she had been using the pressure pad to call for help and no staff responded because she believed it was not working. Resident 102 stated earlier in the morning her normal call light had been changed to the pressure pad call button. Resident 102…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen's drain in working order when the sewage drainpipe was observed disconnected and leaking outside the kitchen. This decreased the facility's potential to maintain sewer lines in proper working order and containment.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/9/25 at 11:27 a.m. with the Maintenance Director (Maint Dir) outside the kitchen near the wall corresponding to the kitchen's food preparation sink. A black plastic sewer pipe was observed coming off the wall down to the top of the ground. The pipe was observed disconnected at one of the joints with light-colored solid particles scattered in the direction of the slope of the ground from the pipe's opening. Maint Dir confirmed that the pipe is not supposed to be disconnected. During an interview on 9/12/25 at 1:47 p.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), DS acknowledged that a leaky drainpipe could attract pests, and it should have been fixed. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Maintenance Service,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided by the facility met professional standards of practice for administering medications as ordered by the physician (MD) for three residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3) of three sampled residents when: 1. Resident 1 did not receive her heart failure medication, antidepressant medication, and ointment for skin redness;2. Resident 2 did not receive a dose of his anti-fungal powder; and,3. Resident 3 did not receive her medication to alleviate pain and itching and medication for her thyroid. These failures decreased the facility's potential to ensure residents received medications that prevented a decline in their health status or prolonged discomfort due to their health diagnoses. Findings:1. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF - a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a census of 94 residents from sexual abuse when the facility allowed an alleged perpetrator, Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1), to enter the facility on 4/4/25 after conducting an incomplete investigation per facility policy for a census of 94 residents. This failure granted CNA 1 access to Resident 1 and had the potential to place Resident 1 and other residents at risk for further harm. Cross-reference F610. Findings A review of an admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cardiomegaly (a condition when the heart becomes larger than normal) and dementia (a progressive state of mental decline). A review of Resident 1's progress note dated 4/4/25 at 9:38 p.m. indicated, Spoke to this [Resident 1] at approximately 12:40 p.m. today due to .reporting to a CNA that [Resident 1] experienced sexual abuse at the facility .This [Resident 1] reported that a male cleaned her in her room after a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespreadRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of sexual abuse for one resident (Resident 1) of eight sampled residents when Resident 1 alleged a male Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) matching the identity of CNA 1 exposed himself to Resident 1 and forced Resident 1 to touch his genitals. This failure decreased the facility's potential to protect Resident 1 and a facility census of 94 residents at the facility from harm. Findings: A review of CNA 1's employee file indicated he was hired at the facility on 8/31/21. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated admission to the facility on 2/24/25 with a diagnosis of cardiomegaly (a condition when the heart becomes larger than normal), dementia (a progressive state of mental decline), delirium due to known physiological condition, adult failure to thrive (a condition where older adults experience a significant decline in their overall health and well-being, often due to a combination of physical,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse and change of condition policy for two residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) of four sampled residents when the facility staff did not: Notify the residents' family representatives and physicians, Document an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- a multidisciplinary team who ensures a comprehensive and coordinated approach to patient care) note, and Initiate care plans to provide person-centered care for both residents for an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse. This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent recurrence of abuse between Resident 1 and Resident 2. Findings: A review of a investigation summary report sent to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) on 4/14/25 indicated, On 4/9/25, the [Resident 1] reported to the staff that her roommate [Resident 2], came to her bed around midnight, tore the blankets off the bed, began commanding that she go to the bathroom, and then struck her on the face and chest several times. During an interview on 4/25/25 at 9:10 a.m., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported within the required timeframe for two residents (Resident 1 & Resident 2) of four sampled residents when an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse was reported to the California Department of Public Health (Department) five days later. This failure of timely reporting had the potential to cause a delayed response by enforcement agencies to ensure resident safety. Findings: A review of a facility document dated and received by the Department on 4/14/25, indicated an allegation of suspected dependent adult/elder abuse had been made on 4/09/25 related to a resident-to-resident altercation between Resident 1 and Resident 2. During an interview on 4/25/25 at 11:28 a.m., the Administrator stated the facility had mistakenly sent the five-day abuse investigation summary to the Department since the facility was not required to report abuse at all when the residents involved had dementia (memory loss), and the incident had not resulted in serious bodily injury. The Administrator confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy, for one resident out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Resident 1 made an abuse allegation on 3/26/25 but the facility did not report the allegation within two hours to the State (licensing agency), the Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities), and law enforcement, and 2.six out of six facility staff did not know the expectation to report any allegation of abuse within two hours to the State, the Ombudsman, and the law enforcement. These failures could put the resident ' s safety at risk due to delayed intervention. Findings: During an interview on 4/9/25 at 9:45 a.m., Licensed Nurse A (LN A) stated abuse allegations should be reported to the State, Ombudsman and the Police (law enforcement), within 24 hours if there was no injury but within 2 hours if there was injury. LN A stated that late reporting of abuse might put residents at risk for abuse to continue and could put the residents at risk for emotional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure three out of five sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 4) were provided with a homelike environment when Resident 1 would wander into their rooms, rummage through their personal belongings and take them. This failure caused emotional distress and feelings of anger for Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 4. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of polyneuropathy (a condition in which multiple nerves throughout the body are damaged), vascular dementia (type of brain damage caused by reduced blood flow to the brain causing a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and Alzheimer ' s Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). A review of a facility document titled Order Summary Report, dated 2/20/25, indicated a Psych Referral PRN [as needed]. A review of a facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-24 · tag F0573 — patternLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents a copy of their medical records upon request for six of 15 sampled residents. This failure resulted in the obstruction of the residents' right to access their own medical record. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated admission to the facility on 2/9/24 with diagnosis of Central Cord Syndrome (a spinal cord injury that affects arms and hands more than the legs), fusion of the spine surgical procedure permanently joining two or more bones in the spine), and Spinal Stenosis (a condition where the space surrounding the spinal cord becomes narrowed). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 5/17/24, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score was 13 which indicated no cognitive (relating to processes of thinking and reasoning) impairment. A review of a document titled Authorization Form for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately respond to a scabies (a burrowing mite that causes an itchy rash; it can spread from person to person in crowded living situations such as nursing homes) outbreak that resulted in 41 out of 95 residents developing an itchy rash when the infection preventionist did not implement surveillance for potential cases of scabies when rashes began appearing, did not identify the scabies outbreak, and did not report the scabies outbreak to the local health department (LHD) per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance. This failure potentially delayed additional resources and assistance from the local health department to prevent scabies from spreading to all 95 residents and delayed the LHD from investigating potential exposures and further spread in the community. Findings: During an interview on 11/14/24 at 1:35 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON) and Infection Preventionist (IP), DON stated that during a heat wave…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a reliable communication channel to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when phone calls to the facility were not picked up in a timely manner. These multiple unanswered phone calls resulted in difficulties in establishing communication between Resident 1 and her family, causing frustration and distrust. Findings: During an interview on 8/29/24 at 10 a.m., Family Member (FM) stated phone calls to the facility were not always answered. FM stated she did not live in the area, and calling the facility was the only way to contact her mother, Resident 1. FM stated she tried to call the facility in the evenings after her work, and added it was very frustrating when she was unable to get ahold of any staff for any updates or to answer questions. FM stated one phone call was even picked up by a very confused lady, most likely another resident there. FM stated it was pointless for the facility to post their phone number as their contact information, if no one would be answering the calls. An internet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed provide pharmaceutical services that meet the needs of the residents when one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) did not receive Lyrica (a medication used to treat It is used to treat painful nerve diseases) twice, over a seven-day period, contrary to the physician ' s orders. This failure was not in alignment with facility policy and procedures and resulted in Resident 1 to experience unrelieved pain which prompted her subsequent transfer to the emergency room. Findings: During an interview on 8/29/24 at 10 a.m., FM (Family Member stated Resident 1 was not given several doses of Lyrica. FM stated Resident 1 had been on Lyrica for a long time to control her pain and her suddenly missing several doses would increase her risk for withdrawal. FM stated Resident 1 ' s pain got so severe that she requested to be sent out to the emergency room. Record review revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including acute transverse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to: Ensure residents were consistently able to communicate with their Responsible party (RP, the individual who directs someone else's care) and loved ones via the facility phone after 5 p.m., and on the weekends, for two out of two sampled residents (Resident 4 and Anonymous Resident 5 (AR 5). In addition, two out of two Anonymous family members 6 and 7 (A FM 6 and 7) complained of staff not picking up the facility phone at the nursing station and not being able to talk to their loved ones after 5 p.m., at nighttime, and on the weekends, and Licensed Nurses (LNs) and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) stated receiving complaints from family members and residents in general, about how they were not able to communicate with each other when they called the facility phone after 5 p.m., and on the weekends. These failures resulted in Resident 4 and AR 5 feeling frustrated and at risk for depression and self-isolation. Findings: A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate nutrition and weight monitoring for (Resident 1) when (Resident 1) lost 7.8 pounds (5.3%) within the first week of the Resident's admission. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to be at risk for malnutrition, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalance. Findings: During a record review of Resident 1's medical record, face sheet revealed Resident 1 is a [AGE] year old with multiple diagnoses with some being; Spastic Quadriplegic Cerebral Palsy, (impaired movements, due to brain damage at a very young age characterized by paralysis of both arms and both legs, with muscle stiffness in face and trunk of body), Epilepsy (seizure disorder), Dysphagia, (difficulty swallowing), and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating). During a record review of Resident 1's medical record, Brief Interview for mental status (BIMS Score) (indicates thinking and reasoning capabilities. A score of 15 out of 15 is the highest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Staff were aware of what Baseline Care Plan (BCP, a plan that promotes continuity of care and communication among nursing home staff to increase resident safety) was, or its completion time frame. 2. BCP was completed timely for five out of five sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 4, 7 and Anonymous 5). These failures had the potential to put residents' safety at risk and for residents not receiving the care that they need. Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet (demographics) indicated he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Heart Failure (HF, occurs when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should), Vitamin B12 deficiency Anemia (your body doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells because you're low in vitamin B12, a nutrient that helps keep your body's blood and nerve cells healthy) and Parkinson's Disease (PD, a movement disorder that causes tremors, stiffness, and slow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food served to seven out of seven sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, Anonymous 3 and 5) were palatable, and at an appetizing temperature. These failures could lead to Gastrointestinal Disease such as Diarrhea and vomiting and could result in residents not eating their meal, feeling frustrated and upset. Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet (demographics) indicated he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Heart Failure (HF, occurs when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should), Vitamin B12 deficiency Anemia ( your body doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells because you're low in vitamin B12, a nutrient that helps keep your body's blood and nerve cells healthy) and Parkinson's Disease (PD, a movement disorder that causes tremors, stiffness, and slow movement). His Minimum Data Sheet Assessment (MDS, a federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure dietary staff were aware the facility had a vegan (strict vegetarian, vegan diet completely excludes anything that comes from an animal) menu. 2. Ensure one out of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was receiving a vegan meal per his and his responsible party (RP, someone who is able to act on behalf of the resident) preference. These failures led to Resident 1 to not receive a vegan meal per his preference. This failure also had the potential for Resident 1 to not meet the recommended daily intake (RDI, the average daily dietary intake level that is sufficient to meet the nutrient requirements of nearly all (97-98 per cent) healthy individuals in a particular life stage and gender group) for certain nutrients like protein or vitamins which could further compromise his medical status. Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet (demographics) indicated he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure there was a qualified staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out food and nutrition services when a dietary manager (DM) who was not certified was put in place to oversee dietary services when the Registered Dietician (RD) was not employed full-time (staff that works 35 or more hours per week). Findings: During an interview on 4/11/24 8:44 a.m., the DM verified she was not a certified Dietary Manager but was currently enrolled to get her certification. The DM stated she also was not a certified food service manager. The DM stated she had no certification at this facility. The DM stated she was not done in school yet and had not gotten certified as a dietary manager. The DM stated RD came in 3 times a week. The DM stated she oversees the kitchen and dietary needs of the residents if the RD was not in the building. When asked what the facility's policy was with regard to hiring a DM, she was silent. When asked if she should have been certified prior to being hired as a dietary manager, she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed protect the residents ' right to be free from sexual abuse by a resident when one resident, Resident 1, who had a known history of touching a female resident inappropriately, did not have a plan in place to prevent further abuse. This failure resulted in sexual abuse of two additional residents. Findings: On 12/4/23, the Department received a report from the facility that staff witnessed Resident 1 touching female Resident 3 sexually and the local police department was notified. Review of Resident 1 ' s medical record revealed an admission date of 6/13/22 and medical diagnoses that included Parkinson ' s disease (a movement disorder of the brain that gets worse over time), Transient ischemic attack (TIA, a temporary blockage of blood flow in the brain), stimulant dependence, and kidney failure, among others. Resident 1 ' s most recent MDS (minimum data set, an assessment tool) indicated his BIMS score was 11 (Brief interview for mental status, a score of 11 indicates moderate cognitive impairment). Resident 1 '…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a care plan for the behavior of one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was witnessed touching a female resident inappropriately. This failure resulted in Resident 1 continuing to touch female residents inappropriately with no plan in place to manage or prevent the behavior. Finding: On 12/4/23, the Department received a report from the facility that staff witnessed Resident 1 touching female Resident 3 sexually and the local police department was notified. On 12/8/23, the Department received a report from the facility that staff witnessed Resident 1 touch Resident 4 ' s breast and the local police department was notified. During an interview on 12/12/23 at 3:17 p.m., Police Officer stated the first incident reported to their department involved Resident 1 and Resident 2 and was investigated on 11/17/23. Police Officer stated he was concerned about the pattern of Resident 1 ' s behavior and a lack of a safety plan for this guy who ' s just roaming around. Police Officer stated, This guy ' s name…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-03 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled certified nurse assistants (CNA [CNA 1]) had a valid nursing assistant certificate. This deficient practice placed all 94 residents at risk for receiving improper patient care. Findings: During a review of the California Department of Public Health Licensing & Certification (L&C) verification website, CNA 1 ' s certification was checked and was not found. The webpage indicated, Effective [DATE], the online Registry will only display active, denied, suspended and revoked statuses for CNA[s] . During a review of the employee files on [DATE] at 12:50 p.m., it was noted that CNA 1 was hired by the facility on [DATE] with an initial certification date of [DATE] and expiration date of [DATE]. CNA 1's employee file showed that CNA 1's nurse assistant certification expired on [DATE]. Review of the CNA staffing sheets dated [DATE], and as far back as [DATE], showed that CNA 1 worked the night shift with an expired certificate for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the care and services needed for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Resident 1 ' s change in condition was not addressed timely, 2. Resident 1 missed his scheduled tube feedings, 3. Resident 1 ' s pressure injury was not documented according to nursing standards and Resident 1 was not placed on a low-air loss mattress, 4. Resident 1 missed multiple doses of his medications, and 5. Resident 1 was not weighed daily per physician ' s order. These multiple failures to carry out Resident 1 ' s physician orders resulted in care and services not provided to a vulnerable resident totally dependent on nursing staff to meet his needs. Findings: 1. During an interview on [DATE] at 3:18 p.m., FM 2 stated when she came to visit Resident 1 on [DATE] he was having trouble breathing, his blood pressure was 86/54, and his mouth was full of blood. FM 2 stated the OT (occupational therapist) found the low blood pressure, and the OT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility ' s pharmacy failed to deliver timely the medications for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 missing doses of medications he needed for his multiple comorbidities. Findings: Review of Resident 1 ' s medical record revealed an admission date of 10/28/23 and a discharge date of 10/30/23. Resident 1 ' s medical diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke, a blockage of blood flow to the brain), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction, atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often fast heart rhythm), Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure (left heart ventricle (the heart ' s main pumping chamber) becomes stiff and cannot fill properly), and primary hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure) among others. Resident 1 ' s nursing progress note, dated 10/28/23, indicated, Resident is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policy and procedure on infection control practices during a COVID-19 outbreak when: 1) Two unlicensed staff were observed not wearing the correct Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - typically gown, mask, gloves) when entering a COVID positive room. 2) One unlicensed staff was observed in a room with no facemask or PPE that housed a resident on contact precautions (involves the use of PPE appropriately, including gloves, gown, mask to protect against exposure and cross contamination of certain illnesses) for Clostridioides difficile (C-difficile - a contagious bacteria that causes an infection of the colon, the longest part of the large intestine. Symptoms can range from diarrhea to life-threatening damage to the colon.) This deficient practice had the potential to cause cross contamination and spread germs and organisms to other vulnerable residents in the facility. Findings: The facility experienced a COVID-19 outbreak that started on October 26,2023. During an initial observation on 11/2/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and interviews the facility failed to maintain a consistently operable telephone communication system in operating condition that had an established answering system when it was observed there was no efficient communication system to contact the facility by calling the facility ' s main contact phone number during hours of operation and after hours when the front desk receptionist was not in the facility to answer phone calls. This failure caused stress, anxiety, and lack of communication between resident ' s responsible parties, and family members who were unable to contact staff members at the facility creating a safety concern that had the potential to result in delayed or non-delivery of care and services to its residents. Findings: During an interview on 11/7/23 at 9:20 a.m., Licensed Staff A was asked who answered the telephones at the front desk, she stated the facility had a receptionist from 8:00 a.m. to 5 p.m., and after hours, anyone sitting at the front desk can answer the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing professional standards of practice were followed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Licensed Staff A, the admitting nurse, felt Resident 1 needed a higher level of care upon arrival to the facility based on her nursing assessment, but did not notify or share her concerns with the attending physician. In addition, she documented Resident 1's cognition was alert and oriented, when the discharging facility indicated he was nonresponsive and unable to follow commands due to a traumatic brain injury, 2. No baseline or comprehensive care plans were created for Resident 1 until after he passed away at the facility approximately 36 hours after admission, even though, according to the facility physician, he was a critically ill resident, 3. A physician order to provide Resident 1 a snack daily at 8:00 p.m., contradicted another physician order indicating Resident 1 was NPO (No meals/fluids were to be given by mouth), but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided the needed care, assessment and treatment in a timely manner and in accordance with professional standards of practice when Resident 1 A. did not receive a timely assessment for complaints of eye irritation and coughing. B. there were no nurse documentation for the eye infection and coughing C. did not receive the ophthalmic antibiotic order for the eye infection until 2 days later. 4. there were no care plan created for the eye infection or the coughing that would have guide staff on how to care for Resident 1 safely. These failures resulted to Resident 1 developing a fever, an infection on both eyes and right lung infiltrates (a pulmonary infiltrate is a substance denser than air, such as pus, blood, or protein, which lingers within the parenchyma of the lungs) in the facility. Resident 1 ' s status had worsened and she was then sent to the hospital for further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-04-23 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (a public advocate [official] who is charged to provide valuable assistance to residents, their families and/or friends, in the resolution of quality of care and quality of life issues) when five of five sampled residents (Residents 74, 15, 45, 23 and 84) were transferred out, and eventually admitted to acute care. This failure had the potential for all five sampled residents to not have protection from being discharged or transferred inappropriately, and limit residents' access to an advocate who can inform them of their options and rights. Findings: During an interview on 4/19/21, at 9 a.m., Resident 74 stated he had recently come back from the hospital. A review of Resident 74's SBAR Communication Form and Progress Note for RNs/LPN/LVNs (SBAR: Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation, provides a framework for communication between members of the health care team about a patient's condition), dated 3/26/21, indicated seizures noted lasting 15-30 secs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with dignity and respect when a staff member did not knock on the door before entering five of five residents' rooms (Resident 41, Resident 34, Resident 67, Resident 24 & Resident 66). This failure had the potential to cause residents to feel disrespected and an invasion of privacy when staff did not knock and request permission before entering resident rooms. Findings: During an observation on 4/19/2021, beginning at 8:30 a.m., Staff H entered each resident's room without knocking on the door while this surveyor conducted interviews with Resident 34, Resident 66, Resident 67, Resident 41 & Resident 24. During an interview on 4/19/2021 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 24 stated that she did not care anymore if a staff walked in her room without knocking on the door first because it happened all the time. During an interview on 4/19/2021 at 11:30 a.m., Resident 67 stated that she was used to housekeeping staff entering her room without knocking on the door. During an interview on 4/22/21 at 11:10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-04-23 · tag F0575 — isolatedPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the contact information for the Office of the State Long-Term Ombudsman (the Ombudsman) in a form and manner accessible to residents. This failure resulted in four of four residents (Residents 3, 4, 31 and 44) not knowing how to contact the Ombudsman. Findings: During a group interview on 4/20/21, at 10 a.m., Residents 3, 4, 31 and 44 stated they did not know how to contact the Ombudsman. During an interview on 4/20/21, at 11:05 a.m., Staff B was asked the location of the Ombudsman contact information sign. Staff B stated there were two signs displaying the Ombudsman contact information in the facility: one inside the staff breakroom and one at the entrance of Hall 2 (rooms 15-25). During an observation on 4/20/21, at 11:05 a.m., the Ombudsman contact information sign placed at the entrance of Hall 2 could only be seen by persons entering Hall 2. During a concurrent interview, Staff P confirmed the Ombudsman contact information sign at the entrance of Hall 2 was only visible to residents and family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that met the needs of three of three residents (Residents 28, 35, and 232). For Resident 28, the facility did not create a care plan for use of supplemental oxygen. For Resident 232 the facility did not create a care plan for a PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) line, an intravenous catheter. For Residents 35 and 232, the facility did not create a care for use of indwelling urinary catheters (drainage tubes for urine). These failures placed Residents 28, 35 and 232 at risk of not having their care needs met, including the prevention of urinary, respiratory, skin and blood infection. Findings: During an observation on 4/19/21, at noon, Resident 35 had a Foley catheter (a type of indwelling urinary catheter). A review of Resident 35's care plans indicated no care plans with interventions to care for Resident 35's Foley catheter. During an interview on 4/22/21, at 3 p.m., Staff B reviewed Resident 35's care plans and confirmed there was no Foley catheter care plan.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-04-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the activities care plan for one of two residents (Resident 35). This failure resulted in Resident 35 not enjoying his favorite activity of being outdoors for fresh air and sun. Findings: A review of Resident 35's facesheet (a resident demographic) indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia (an impairment in motor or sensory function of the lower extremities), pressure ulcers (injuries to the skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin), generalized muscle weakness and Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). A review of Resident 35's activities care plan dated 3/1/21 indicated Resident 35 enjoyed being outdoors. A review of progress note dated 3/29/21, at 3:01 p.m., indicated SS [Social Services] met with patients [family] to address [family]'s concerns. [Family] is concerned about him not getting up and his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility and their pharmacist failed to ensure that the instructions on the label of the medication (Prednisone - an anti-inflammatory) container were correct for one of three residents (Resident 80). The discrepancy in the instructions, on the medication container, the eMAR (electronic medication administration record), and the doctor's order for the administration of Resident 80's Prednisone included with lunch, at 8:30 a.m., and one time a day. This failure of uncorrected administration instructions for the Prednisone had the potential to cause a medication error when dispensing the Prednisone leading to possible adverse effects for Resident 80. Findings: During an observation on 4/21/21 at 8:30 a.m., Staff M prepared morning medications for Resident 80. Staff M handed the medication container of Prednisone to this Surveyor for review. The label on medication container, for Resident 80, revealed, Prednisone tablet 5mg (milligrams), give 1 tablet by mouth every day with lunch. A concurrent review of the eMAR for Resident 80…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate labeling of medications for safe administration, for safe and proper storage of medication in the correct temperature, for discarding expired medication, and for labeling food items in the refrigerator located in the Medication Room. These failures had the potential to result in licensed nurses administering wrong medication or the wrong dose of medications which may have a significant adverse effect on residents that may lead to serious harm or death. Findings: Labeling: During an observation on 4/21/21 at 8:30 a.m., Staff M prepared morning medications for Resident 80. Staff M handed the medication container of Prednisone to this Surveyor for review. The label on medication container, for Resident 80, revealed, Prednisone tablet 5mg (milligrams), give 1 tablet by mouth every day with lunch. A concurrent review of the eMAR for Resident 80 revealed, 8:30 a.m. to give Prednisone tablet 5mg, Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Hx (history) of kidney transplant. The second line of the eMAR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-04-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 50) when her signature was entered on the wrong line in the medication consent form. This failure had the potential to misrepresent a resident's care experience, and assented plan of care goals and treatment. Findings: During an interview on 4/21/21, at 10 a.m., Resident 50 stated she is taking Cymbalta (a medication used to treat depression and anxiety) and Zyprexa (medication used to treat psychotic conditions such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder). A review of Resident 50's admission Record indicated she was her own responsible party. During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 50's PACS: Informed Consent - Psychoactive Medication form on 4/22/21 at 3:19 p.m., Staff E confirmed the Patient/Responsible Party Signature line was unsigned. Staff E stated, It looks like the resident signed on the physician signature line instead. I'm not sure who checks and reviews these consents, but someone should have caught that. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all staff to practice infection control prevention when: A housekeeper did not change gloves after cleaning each resident's rooms, and, A housekeeper did not wash hands or use alcohol based hand rub (ABHR) after cleaning each resident's room, and, Licensed nurses did not change the dressing (bandage) on the PICC line (Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter - an intravenous line). These failures had the potential to spread infections (such as Covid19) to vulnerable residents, staff, and visitors, or skin and blood infections due to unchanged PICC line dressing. Findings: During an observation on 4/19/2021 at 8:30 a.m., Staff H entered room [ROOM NUMBER] with cleaning products in her hands with gloves. Staff H cleaned bathroom, wiped table top, handrails, mopped floors, wiped doorknobs. Staff H did not remove her dirty gloves (not heavy-duty) when exited the room. Staff H returned the cleaning products into housekeeping cart. Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$10,166 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $10,166 — penalty dated 2025-01-28
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROVIDENCE GROUP WINE COUNTRY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/16/2016 |
| PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/30/2023 |
| PICETTI, DOMINIC | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| BILLS, KEVAN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2022 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $953K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055854. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.