Redwood Cove Healthcare Center
1162 S Dora St., Ukiah, CA 95482 · For profit - Partnership · 68 certified beds · (707) 462-1436 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.1% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.4% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.2% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.6% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.3% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.6% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.15 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.27 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 272 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 71.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 107 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.5%CMS range 56.2–68.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 7.8–12.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 71.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 70.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 54.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 4.6–10.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.17 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 63.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.17 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe environment for all residents of the facility when the facility failed:1.implement and follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention, primarily used in nursing homes, that involves the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities to reduce the transmission of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO)- microorganisms, primarily bacteria, that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) for Resident 7 and Resident 78, and 2. to review and revise, at least annually, the facility's infection prevention and control (IPC) policy and procedure (P&P).These failures increase the risk of infection, potentially leading to outbreaks (the occurrence of more cases of disease or health events than is normally expected in the facility, often appearing suddenly or in a cluster), that may cause severe health complications. Not reviewing IPC policies annually had the potential to hinder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-02 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to designate at least one qualified infection preventionist (IP), for all residents of the facility, when the those performing the role of the IP had not completed specialized training or obtained certification in infection control and prevention. Lack of a qualified IP could lead to an increased risk of infections spreading among residents and staff. Findings:During an interview on 09/24/2025 at 5:23 PM, the Director of Nursing confirmed the facility did not have a designated certified IP for approximately one month. The DON stated he and the interim IP were currently assuming the IP position but neither of them were certified. The DON stated it was important to designate a certified IP at the facility to ensure proper infection control protocol was being followed. The DON stated not having a certified IP could result in increased infection rate at the facility.During an interview on 09/25/2025 at 9:45 a.m., the interim IP stated the facility did not have a designated certified IP onsite. She stated she was the interim IP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary kitchen environment for all 63 residents of the facility, when the kitchen had cracked and broken floor tiles.This failure can increase the risk of trips and falls from the uneven surfaces and create an environment for molds and mildew growth.Findings:During an initial tour of the kitchen on 09/22/25 at 12:24 p.m., the kitchen had several cracked and broken floor tiles. Photos were taken to document the finding.During a concurrent review of photos of the kitchen floor and interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 09/22/25, at 12:36 a.m., the DM confirmed the kitchen had several cracked and broken floor tiles.A review of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations section 483.90(i), Other Environmental Conditions, indicated: The facility must provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and records review, the facility failed to have an effective pest control system for all 63 residents of the facility, when cockroaches were observed in the kitchen under the dish washing sink. This failure had the potential to cause food contamination and endanger the vulnerable residents of the facility.Findings:During the initial tour of the kitchen on 9/22/25 at 12:21 p.m. insects that looked like cockroaches were observed crawling under the dishwashing sink. A video was taken of the observation.During an interview on 09/22/2025 at 2:08 p.m., Unlicensed Staff A reported seeing a large cockroach in the hallway near the shower room the previous week. She also acknowledged being aware of cockroach activity in the kitchen. She also emphasized that it is the facility's responsibility to ensure the kitchen and overall environment remain free of cockroaches, noting that cockroaches carry diseases that could potentially make residents ill.During a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 09/22/2025 at 2:50 p.m., the DM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 10) was informed in advance of the risks and benefits associated with a proposed treatment, when an informed consent (a voluntary agreement to accept treatment or procedures after receiving education about the associated risks, benefits, and available alternatives) was not obtained prior to the facility administering Resident 10 medication for depression.This failure placed Resident 10 at risk of receiving medication she might have declined had she been fully informed, potentially compromising her right to make informed decisions about her care.Findings:A review of Resident 10's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), indicated she was admitted to the facility in March of 2023 with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).A review of Resident 10's order summary, for the month of September 2025, indicated on 8/10/25, Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 46) with the opportunity to exercise her right to make a choice when her room was changed without her consent.This failure resulted in Resident 46 feeling upset and as though she didn't have a choice.Findings:A review of Resident 46's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility in May 2020 with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A review of Resident 46's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 6/17/25, indicated Resident 46 had no memory impairment.During an interview on 9/23/25 at 1:54 p.m., Resident 46 stated she had to change rooms because the facility needed her room for a new admission. Resident 46 stated the change of her room upset her and she felt like she didn't have a choice.During an interview on 9/25/25 at 12:41 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON confirmed Resident 46 was moved to another room. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed, for three out of 16 sampled residents (Residents 1, 7 and 9), to ensure a written summary of the baseline care plan (BCP, a document created within 48 hours of a resident's admission, outlining the initial care needed, focusing on basic needs and resident-specific information) was provided to the resident and or the responsible party (RP, a person who is designated in making decisions about health care and financial matters) .This failure could compromise residents' safety, hinder effective communication, and could lead to adverse events, especially during the critical initial days of admission.Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date of 8/21/25 with a diagnosis of muscle weakness and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 1's Baseline Care Plan-Person Centered Care Planning-V3.1 form, with an effective date of 8/21/25, did not indicate the BCP summary was provided to the resident or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was less than 5 percent (% a unit of measure) when there were two errors out of 33 medication administration opportunities for a 6.06% medication error rate. This failure decreased the facility's potential to safely administer medications per physician's orders and prevent the risk of adverse outcomes.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/25/25 at 08:18 a.m. with Licensed Nurse E (LN E), LNE was observed giving Resident 1 Metoprolol Tartrate (a heart medication) 25 milligrams (mg, a unit of measurement) tablet, and Amiodarone (a medication to regulate the hearts rhythm) 100 mg tablet. LN E confirmed she gave Resident 1 both medications when Resident 1's systolic blood pressure (SBP, the maximum pressure the heart generates when it beats) was 122 millimeters of mercury (mmHg, a measurement of pressure) and the diastolic pressure (DBP, the minimum pressure the heart generates when it beats) was 72 mmHg.During a record review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored safely for one out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 6), when Resident 6 was allowed to self-administer aspirin (ASA) and antacid tablets as well as keep the ASA and antacid tablets at her bedside with no assessment or physician's order.These failures put Resident 6 at risk for medication error and misuse. Findings:A review of Resident 6's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date in 12/2021 with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, lung disease, such as asthma or emphysema) and essential Hypertension (high blood pressure).A review of Resident 6's Physician Order Summary (POS, a healthcare professional's written instruction specifying the care, services, treatment and medications a patient should receive, active as of 9/24/25, the POS indicated an order for ASA 81 milligrams (mg- metric unit of measurement, used for medication dosage and/or amount) daily. There were no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat one resident (Resident 1) out of three sampled residents with dignity and respect when facility staff entered Resident 1's room without announcing themselves or being invited in.This failure caused Resident 1 to feel anxious and unsafe in his room.A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Chronic Venous Hypertension (a condition characterized by high pressure inside the veins, most commonly in the legs) with ulcer (an open sore on the skin) of left lower extremity (leg) and Chronic Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (a mental health condition that can develop after experiencing a terrifying or dangerous event).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 6/20/25 indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment used to measure cognition (a person's ability to process information and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and document reviews, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) possessed a current and active certificate in accordance with applicable State laws when one CNA (CNA A) of a sample of nine CNAs had an expired certificate. This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide safe resident care within CNA A's scope of practice. Findings: A review of nine CNA certificate verifications which were provided by the Director of Staff Development (DSD) was conducted on [DATE] and indicated CNA A's certificate expired on [DATE]. A review of the daily nursing schedule dated [DATE] indicated CNA A was scheduled to work that afternoon from 3 p.m. until 7 a.m. on [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:10 a.m., the DSD acknowledged CNA A had been working with an expired certification. A review of the daily CNA schedule between [DATE] and [DATE] indicated CNA A worked with an expired certificate from [DATE] to [DATE], [DATE] to [DATE], and [DATE] to [DATE]. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to carry out a physician ' s order for one resident (Resident 1) of two sampled residents when nursing staff did not document they were monitoring Resident 1 ' s Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC line, a long, thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein in the upper arm and guided to a large vein near the heart used to deliver medication) insertion site every shift from 3/28/25 to 4/11/25. This failure increased the potential for a delay in identification of infection and negatively affect the health of Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE], and her medical diagnoses included acute osteomyelitis (infection of the bones), right tibia and fibula (two long bones of the lower leg) and Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA, a bacterium resistant to many antibiotics) infection. A review of Resident 1 ' s order summary report dated April 2025 indicated an active order for a PICC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 1) of two sampled residents was free from a significant medication error when a dose of intravenous (IV- administered into a vein) antibiotic was not documented as administered on 4/5/25 per the physician's order. This failure had the potential to result in incomplete treatment and increase the risk of antibiotic resistance, making further infections harder to treat. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE], and her medical diagnoses included acute osteomyelitis (infection of the bones), right tibia and fibula (two long bones of the lower leg) and Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA, a bacterium resistant to many antibiotics) infection. A review of Resident 1's order summary report indicated an order for daptomycin-sodium chloride (an antibiotic used to treat complicated skin infections) IV solution 700-0.9 milligrams (mg)/100 milliliters (ml) every evening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-03 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it designated a person to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services who was certified, when the Registered Dietician (RD) was not employed full-time. This failure indicated the facility did not meet the Federal guidelines and did not follow the job description, when hiring a Dietary Manager (DM). During an interview on 4/29/24 at 10:01 a.m., the Dietary Manager (DM) stated she was not a Certified Dietary Manager. The DM stated the Registered Dietician (RD) only came in once every week on Wednesdays. The DM stated she did not receive consistent in-services and training's from the RD. During an interview on 4/30/24 at 3 p.m., the DM stated she was not a Certified DM. The DM also stated she was not a graduate of a Dietetic Technician Training Program approved by Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND, an organization of dietetic professionals committed to improving the nation's health). The DM stated she also did not receive six hours of Title 22 (State regulations on health and safety standards for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Resident Rights of 13 Sampled Residents (Resident 200, Resident 16, Resident 28, Resident 164, Resident 264, Resident 22, Resident 5, Resident 42, Resident 14, Resident 53, Resident 38, Resident 30 and Resident 31) were honored, when: 1. Ten Sampled Residents (Resident 200, Resident 16, Resident 28, Resident 164, Resident 264, Resident 22, Resident 5, Resident 42, Resident 14, and Resident 53) reported call light response times of up to two hours. This failure resulted in delay in care and a loss of dignity, when residents were not assisted with timely brief changes when soiled and had the potential to result in incontinent accidents, falls resulting in broken bones, soft tissue injuries, pressure ulcers, psychosocial harm, feelings of despair and depression. 2. The facility did not ensure two sampled Residents (Resident 200, Resident 16) had useable prescription glasses. This failure resulted in the inability of Residents to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment for residents, when hand hygiene was not offered to residents before meals, when the hand hygiene P&P was not followed during medication administration, and cross-contamination risks were observed in linen storage and laundry processing areas. Findings: (Reference F 880) During an observation on 4/29/24, at 11:33 a.m., in the housekeeping closet next to Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], the floor, walls, sink and equipment, door and door jamb appeared to have a black, gray residue on all surfaces. The black, gray substance felt greasy to the touch. Under the sink was what appeared to be a calcified, wet, plumbing leak originating from the hopper sink. (See Photos) During an observation on 4/29/24, at 11:34 a.m., the resident Shower Room, located in the hallway across from staffing, had multiple unlabeled razors, lotions, and shampoo sitting on a shower shelf. An insect was on a resident shower seat. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Staff were aware of what a Basic Care Plan (BCP, a plan that promotes continuity of care and communication among nursing home staff which should be completed within 48 hours of resident admission and contain the minimum healthcare information necessary to care for resident safely) was and its completion time frame. 2. The BCP was completed for one out of one sampled resident (Resident 216) and completed timely for seven out of eight sampled residents (Residents 10, 14, 20, 30, 31, 216, and 265). These failures had the potential to put residents' safety at risk and for residents not receiving the care they need. Findings: A review of Resident 10's face sheet (demographics) indicated he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Hyperlipidemia (HLP, high cholesterol is an excess of lipids or fats in your blood), Essential Hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM, disease caused by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, for a resident who had a tube feeding (method of feeding that uses the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to deliver nutrition and calories when you cannot eat or drink safely by mouth), the facility failed to: 1. periodically evaluate the amount of feeding being administered for one out one sampled resident (Resident 265), when staff did not know to calculate how much formula was given and how much formula should be left in the feeding bag in a period of time. 2. monitor Resident 265's input and output (I &O, important to help evaluate a person's fluid and electrolyte balance, to suggest various diagnosis, and allows for prompt intervention to correct the imbalance) to ensure she was receiving the calculated amount of tube feeding consistent with practitioner's orders. These failures could put Resident 265 at risk for fluid and electrolyte imbalance (occurs if the body has too much or too little water), dehydration (a condition that results when the body loses more…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Follow its Policy and Procedure for Medication Regimen Review. 2. Ensure staff knew what a glycoprotein-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF, used to increase the number of white blood cells in the blood, which helps your immune system fight infections and heal injuries, in patients receiving anticancer drugs) injection was. 3. Ensure the monthly Medication Regimen Review by the Pharmacist for Resident 14 was thorough and accurate, when the medication G-CSF injection was not listed on Resident 14's current medications, and staff did not notify the pharmacist Resident 14 was receiving G-CSF injection weekly. These failures had the potential to: 1. Cause serious physical and/or psychosocial harm when the facility did not forward pharmacy recommendations to any facility physician for five months, September 2023 through March 2024. 2. Prevent the Pharmacist from identifying an irregularity that might require an urgent action to protect Resident 14.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable, and served at temperatures in accordance with resident preferences, for four out of five sampled residents (Residents 5, 14, 42 and 53), and the food temperature was not taken prior to serving to one out of 5 sampled residents (Resident 47). These failures could result in residents not eating the food served, which could result in weight loss and further compromise their medical status. Not taking the food temperature prior to serving to the resident could result in accidents such as burns. Findings: A review of Resident 14's face sheet (demographics) indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses of Dysphagia (swallowing difficulties), Hyperlipidemia (HLP, abnormally high levels of fats (lipids) in the blood) and Essential Hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure). Resident 14 reported she had Breast Cancer (Cancer that forms in tissues of the breast) which was being treated outside the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator, freezer and dry pantry area were opened- and discard-dated and expired food items were discarded. These failures led to unsafe and unsanitary storage of food. These failures were also a safety risk that could lead to accidental ingestion of expired food items that could result in food-borne illness (an illness that comes from eating contaminated food). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/29/24 at 9:49 a.m., the dry pantry was noted with cooking oil that was halfway used and an opened two-way chocolate mix that did not have a discard date. Refrigerator 1 had an opened bottle of 100% lemon juice and teriyaki sauce that had no open and discard-by date. The Dietary Manager (DM) stated these items should be opened- and discard-dated. The DM stated all food items in the kitchen should be opened- and discard-dated. During an interview on 4/29/24 at 10:01 a.m., the DM stated food items in the kitchen should have an open- and discard-by date so staff knew when food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective Infection Control Program when: 1. Dirty and stained carpeting, broken floor surfaces, cracked wheelchair arm rests, exposed wall plaster, rust, and chipped paint were observed in patient care areas. 2. Cross-contamination risks were observed in Laundry Processing and storage areas, Clean Utility Room, and resident Ice Storage Room. 3. Vaccination rates of staff and Residents and Hand Hygiene compliance was not monitored. These failures had the potential for resident infection, potential death from cross-contamination and infection, and psychosocial harm Findings: (Reference F 584) 1. During an observation on 4/29/24, at 11:33 a.m. the Housekeeping Closet, next to Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the floor, walls, sink and equipment, door and door jamb had black, gray residue on all surfaces. The black, gray substance felt greasy to the touch. Under the sink there appeared to be a calcified, wet, plumbing leak…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen walls were in good repair, when cracks and holes in the walls were noted during rounds, and the dish washing sink counter was rusty. These failures could result in rodents and pests accessing the kitchen area through these cracks and holes, which could put residents at risk for harmful diseases. The rusty kitchen sink counter created a breeding ground for bacteria as it could not be disinfected and cleaned thoroughly, which could be a safety risk. Findings: During an observation on 4/29/24 at 9:58 a.m., the wall underneath the dish washing sink, near the dish sanitizing machine, was cracked and had a hole, the floor was dirty with whitish material build up, the area under the sink was noted with cobwebs. The metal sheet wall by the dish washing area had holes. The wall by the door leading towards the hallway had a hole, and the dishwashing sink counter was rusty. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/1/24 at 7:23 a.m., the Dietary Manager verified the sheet metal wall by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of pests or cockroaches, when a cockroach was seen crawling underneath the dish washing sink. This failure could lead to transfer of harmful bacteria to humans and could cause Salmonella (a group of bacteria that can cause diarrhea-3 or more loose, watery stool in a day, in humans), Leptospirosis (an infectious disease that damages the liver and kidneys), Typhoid Fever (a life-threatening infection that causes diarrhea and fever) and Cholera (an infectious disease that causes severe watery diarrhea). During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/1/24 at 7:23 a.m., a brownish-colored pest was crawling underneath the dishwashing sink area, which the Dietary Manager (DM) identified as a small cockroach. The DM stated this was not the first time they saw a cockroach in the kitchen area. The DM stated this was an ongoing issue. The DM stated pests and cockroaches could bring illness, and residents could get sick, such as Nausea (the condition of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0574 — isolatedThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were aware of and had access to, State Survey Agency contact information. This failure had the potential to interfere with residents' ability to file a complaint with the State Agency and possibly delay an investigation. Findings: During an interview on 4/30/24 at 2:05 PM, during the Resident Council Meeting, Residents 5, 42, 14, 53, and 4 stated they did not know how to file a complaint with the State Agency or where to find contact information. During an interview and observation on 5/2/24 at 4:35 PM, with Licensed Nurse F (LN F), when asked about the posting for residents to file a complaint with the State Agency, LN F pointed to the posting for the Ombudsman. During an interview and observation on 5/2/24 at 4:36 PM, with LN F, the surveyor was escorted to a bulletin board which did not contain State Agency contact information. The LN F stated, Let me ask my supervisor where to find the posting. During an interview and observation on 5/2/24 at 4:38 PM, with LN F, the surveyor was escorted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the results of the most recent State Survey in a location readily accessible (a place where individuals wishing to examine survey results did not have to ask to see them) to residents, family members, and/or legal representatives of residents. This failure had the potential to prevent access to relevant information that could affect a resident's decision making, quality of care and/or quality of life. Findings: During an interview on 4/30/24 at 2:05 PM, in the Resident Council Meeting, Residents 5, 42, 14, 53, and 4 stated they did not know where to access the results of the State Survey. Residents 5, 42, 14, 53, and 4 stated they wanted to know where the information was located. During an observation on 5/2/24 at 4:30 PM, in the hallway across from the nurse's station, a large white binder with a label, Survey Results, and with a small piece of paper stuck to the binder indicating, 2012 - 2016, was in a binder holder on the wall. During an interview on 5/2/24 at 4:40 PM, the Administrator stated he had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified for a significant weight loss (5% in 1 month, 10% in 3 months and 7.5 % in 6 months) for one out of one sampled resident (Resident 25). This failure had the potential to further aggravate and compromise her medical status. Findings: A review of Resident 25's face sheet (demographics) indicated she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Essential Hypertension (occurs when you have abnormally high blood pressure that is not the result of a medical condition), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and Anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). Her Minimum Data Sheet Assessment (MDS, a federally-mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes), dated 2/12/24, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a mandatory tool used to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents) score was 13, indicating intact cognition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility did not ensure two sampled Residents (Resident 200, Resident 16) had useable prescription glasses. This failure resulted in the inability of Residents to read, be able to watch television, see what they were eating, or engage in activities that provided them joy. This failure made the Residents feel like they did not matter and were unimportant to the facility. Findings: (Cross Reference F550) During an observation and interview on 4/29/24, at 11:19 a.m., Resident 16 was laying in her bed, with the curtains pulled shut and no lights on. She was on her back, in a patient gown, not wearing glasses. A bedside table with a paperback book, an embroidery project and an eyeglass case were on her right side. She stated she wore glasses and pointed to her eyeglass case, which contained a pair of yellow metal eyeglass frames missing the right lens. Resident 16 stated she did not know if anyone ordered her a new pair of glasses. She stated she told staff about it, and no body had followed up with her for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly label insulin pens (insulin delivery device that comes preloaded with insulin, including premixed insulin's) with resident information, when insulin pens were labeled on the outer plastic storage bag or on the cap of the pen instead of the shaft (the section of the pen that contains the insulin storage container). This failure had the potential to: 1. Expose residents to infectious agents if the insulin pens were used by more than one resident. 2. Cause serious adverse effects if a resident was given a dose and/or type of insulin prescribed for another resident. Findings: During an observation and interview on 5/1/24 at 8 AM, Licensed Nurse G (LN G) prepared and administered insulin to Resident 1 using an insulin pen. LN G stated the insulin pen was obtained from the E Kit (Emergency Medication Supply for use when resident medications were not available) and did not come labeled with resident identifying information. LN G filled in the label with Resident 1's identifying information. During an observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the development of a plant-based menu. This failure had the potential for residents to not meet the Recommended Daily Intake (RDI, the average daily dietary intake level that is sufficient to meet the nutrient requirements of nearly all (97-98 per cent) healthy individuals in a particular life stage and gender group) for certain nutrients like protein or vitamins,which could further compromise their medical status. During a concurrent observation and interview 5/1/24 at 7:23 a.m., the Dietary Manager (DM) stated the facility did not have a plant-based menu. The DM stated she asked their vendor and was told they did not have any plant-based menu being offered at this time, but they would be releasing a plant-based menu soon. The DM stated, if the facility had a resident on a vegan diet, they would just use the food items they currently had in the building to substitute. The DM checked the freezer and found a Ziploc labeled Veggie burger which had no information on the dietary content, such as calories…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement its policies and procedures on infection prevention and control practices when: 1. An unlicensed staff did not perform hand hygiene and change her gloves between residents did not clean and disinfect the vital signs equipment between residents and after using the equipment. 2. Two staff did not wear proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) upon entering two resident rooms that were on transmission-based precautions. 3. Two licensed staff did not cleanse and disinfect vital sign equipment in-between residents and after using equipment. These failures did not ensure a clean physical environment for patient care and services, and had the potential to result in an outbreak of infections and illnesses to all residents of the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation on 3/9/22, at 9:54 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER] with Unlicensed Staff L, she was observed taking the vital signs equipment to the room. Unlicensed Staff L…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to offer and document advance directives for 8 of 17 sampled residents (Resident 9, Resident 11, Resident 13, Resident 15, Resident 17, Resident 40, Resident 57, and Resident 163). This failure had the potential to result in facility performing care and services at residents' end-of-life that is inconsistent with the residents' best interests or preferences. Findings: During a review of medical records for Advance Directives, the following residents (Resident 13, Resident 15, Resident 17, Resident 40, and Resident 57) had no indication in their medical records that an advanced directive was listed or offered to these residents upon admission. During an interview on 3/9/22 at 11:30 a.m., the Social Service Director (SSD) stated she was not responsible for obtaining the Advance Directives. When asked who the responsible party for Advance Directives was SSD stated to check with the facility's Admissions Coordinator. During an interview on 3/9/22 at 12:00 p.m., the Admissions Coordinator stated he was the responsible person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-11 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure access to telephone communication for residents, family members, staff, and outside affiliates was easily available. This failure denied residents, family members and medical staff consistent communication regarding the medical care for residents and had the potential to result in a delayed or non-delivery of care and services to its residents. Findings: During an observation on 3/8/21 at 8:30 a.m., the screener (e.g., facility staff assigned to screen staff and visitors for COVID-19 signs and symptoms as they come into the facility) was observed answering the telephone and walking to individual staff to let them know they have a phone call. During an interview on 3/11/2022 at 12:15 p.m., the Director of Staff Development (DSD) stated the facility utilized a new telephone system, and she was trying to learn how it worked. When phone calls for a resident come into the facility, the calls are forwaded to a satellite phone that was brought to the Resident. Not all resident rooms had their own telephones. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-11 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of the three sampled residents (Resident 50) was provided support with activities of daily living (ADL). This failure resulted in Resident 50 staying in bed throughout the survey, which had the potential to cause development of a pressure injury. Findings: A review of Resident 50's current medical diagnoses indicated the following: dementia (loss of cognitive functioning-thinking, remembering, and reasoning), muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. During an observation on 3/7/22, at 11:30 a.m., Resident 50 was observed laying on bed, doing nothing. During an observation on 3/7/22, at 3:46 p.m., Resident 50 was observed laying on bed sleeping. During an observation on 3/8/22, at 10:29 a.m., Resident 50 was observed laying on bed, looking around the room and playing with her blanket. At 11:35 a.m. Resident 50 was observed still in bed. During an interview on 3/9/22, at 3:16 p.m., Management Staff S stated that Resident 50 did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator were labeled and dated. This failure had the potential to result in residents eating or drinking expired or contaminated food items, which could cause gastrointestinal illness for the vulnerable residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/7/22, at 10:28 a.m., the kitchen was observed with Management Staff E. One carton of opened orange juice that was not dated was observed inside the drink refrigerator. Management Staff E stated they can keep the opened orange juice for five days and it should be dated. Four small disposable white cups/bowls with lids with food inside were observed in refrigerator #1. Management Staff E was about to throw them away and Dietary Staff F stated those were Rocky Road pudding and will be used for later. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/9/22, at 9:36 a.m., the nursing station refrigerator for residents' snacks and supplement was observed with Licensed Staff D. One carton of half-filled Med-Pass 2.0…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all areas of the facility were safe, sanitary, of comfortable, when facility staff allowed one resident's (Resident 61) room to become cluttered and odiferous. This failure resulted in added safety risk to Resident 61 related to obstacles in the physical environment that posed a risk to timely evacuation in time of emergency, as well as a strong, foul-smelling odor emitting into the adjacent hallway through the doorway of the resident's room. Findings: During an observation on 3/7/22, at 11:35 a.m., Resident 61's door was observed closed. When opened, there was a distinct foul odor that appeared to be coming from a wound. Resident 61's room was observed full of stock boxes and cluttered personal items. During an interview on 3/7/22, at 11:35 a.m., Management Staff Q stated that Resident 61 had several wounds and last assessment was December 2021, because Resident 61 would not let staff assess the wounds. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/7/22, at 11:50 a.m., Resident 61 was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| TERAN, GUY | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 01/05/2010 |
| TUCKER, RILEY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/01/2022 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055853. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.