Visalia Post Acute
1925 E. Houston Ave, Visalia, CA 93292 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 176 certified beds · (559) 732-1020 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $13,870 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-21)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.7% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.2% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.1% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.4% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.4% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.1% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.2% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.33 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.21 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 138 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 77.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 99 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.1%CMS range 39.6–55.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.5%CMS range 5.8–11.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 77.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 67.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 4.0–10.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.24 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 159.8 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
72 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 61 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its own policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Safety and Supervision of Residents for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was outside the patio area without supervision. This failure resulted in Resident 1 having unwitnessed fall, sustaining a fracture (broken bone) to the right humerus (long bone of the upper arm).FindingsDuring a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated [DATE], the AR indicated, Resident 1 is [AGE] years old, was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of muscle weakness, Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), unsteadiness on feet, difficulty in walking, dizziness, and history of falling.During a review of Resident 1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) comprehensive care plan when no documentation was completed for Resident 1 with a known behavior of manipulating and pulling dialysis catheter (a tube placed into a large vein to access the bloodstream to filter toxins from the blood). This failure had the potential for inconsistent care and severe infection to Resident 1's dialysis site. Findings:During an observation on [DATE] at 12:42 p.m. in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was sitting in a wheelchair grabbing at dialysis catheter. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:42 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated, Resident 1 scratches at her dialysis catheter and kind of tugs on it too.During an interview on [DATE] at 1:15 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated She [Resident 1] pulls at her [dialysis] catheter. She scratches at them [dialysis catheter].During an interview on [DATE] at 2:08 p.m. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was implemented after a resident to resident altercation for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2). This failure had the potential for the staff to be unaware of an ongoing infection and the potential for further incidents.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN) dated 6/22/26, the PN indicated, IDT (Interdisciplinary Team-coordinated group of medical and support professionals who collaborate to evaluate, plan, and deliver patient care.this writer observed (Resident 2) attempting to maneuver his wheelchair around (Resident 1) wheelchair. (Resident 2) then began ramming his wheelchair in (Resident 1) with his wheelchair. This writer immediately called out to direct (Resident 1) to stop. Despite repeated verbal redirection, (Resident 1) made physical contact with (Resident 2) striking him on the right shoulder.Interventions.order Labs/UA (urine analysis).During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP) dated 6/15/26, the CP indicated, Resident was in a resident to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were implemented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when wound care was not initiated upon return from the hospital. This failure resulted in a delay of care to Resident 1's cellulitis (serious bacterial infection affecting the deep layers of the skin and the underlying tissues).Findings:During an interview on 6/9/26 at 11:56 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated she was hospitalized with a foot infection and when she returned from the hospital on 5/30/26, she was not receiving wound care.During a review of Resident 1's Long Term Documentation (LTD-discharge orders from the hospital) dated 5/30/26 at 4:38 p.m., the LTC indicated, Diagnoses.Cellulitis of toe of left foot.Assessment/Plan.left toe cellulitis.Wound care.During a review of Resident 1's Admission/readmission Evaluation/Assessment (AREA-completed by the admitting nurse at the facility) dated 5/30/26 at 9:09 p.m., the AREA indicated Skin Evaluation.left toes 2nd and 3rd toes black color. Resident has wounds or skin concerns…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) had a physician's order for the use of side rails (a safety device or structural support installed on beds, to prevent fall, assist with repositioning, and provide stability when getting in and out of bed). This failure had the potential for inappropriate use of side rails and potential for injury.Findings:During an observation on 5/4/26 at 9:58 a.m. in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was lying in bed with side rails positioned up on both sides at the head of the bed.During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/4/26 at 11:57 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 5/4/26 was reviewed. LVN 1 was not able to find a physician order for Resident 1's side rails. LVN 1 stated Resident 1's side rails should have a physician's order. During an interview on 5/4/26 at 12:05 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated side rails need a physician's order.During a review with of the facility's policy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) needs were met when the bed was not long enough. This failure resulted in Resident 2 being uncomfortable due to not being able to extend his legs while in bed. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/4/26 at 11:03 a.m. with Resident 2, in Resident 2's room, Resident 2 was lying on the bed. Resident 2's head of bed was elevated, his knees were bent and his feet were flat against the foot board of the bed. Resident 2 stated he slept squished up and with his knees bent because the bed was not long enough and he was uncomfortable. Resident 2 stated he had told several staff that the bed was too short but was told the facility did not have longer beds.During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/4/26 at 1:15 p.m. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), in Resident 2's room, ADON stated she could see where the bed needed to be longer for Resident 2.During an interview on 5/4/26 at 1:38 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their policy and procedure was followed when medications were left at the bedside for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for the staff to be unaware if the medication was taken by Resident 1and put other residents at risk for ingesting the medication and experiencing an adverse reaction.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/4/26 at 10:12 a.m. with Resident 1, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was sitting at the end of her bed in her wheelchair with the over bed table next to her. There was a medicine cup on the over bed table that contained six pills. Resident 1 stated the nurse left the medications on her table so she could take them after she ate her breakfast. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/4/26 at 10:36 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, in Resident 1's room, RN 1 confirmed she was the nurse for Resident 1. RN 1 stated she left the medications on the table for Resident 1 because Resident 1 wanted to take her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective grievance process for three of 33 sampled Residents (Residents 122, 66, and 120), when: 1.Resident 122 was not aware of the facility's response to her grievance related to visiting her friend in the facility and expressed she continued to have issues visiting her friend. 2. Resident 66 reported missing clothes to Social Services Assistant (SSA) six months ago and no action was taken.3. Resident 120 requested assistance from SSA regarding scheduling surgery since admission. These failures had the potential to result in violation of resident's right to voice grievances, feel unheard and/or feel unsupported, and the lack of a functional grievance process left residents' concerns unaddressed. Findings: 1.Resident 122 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included weakness and unsteadiness on feet. During an interview with Resident 122 on 3/5/26 at 8:14 AM, Resident 122 stated she had an issue with staff and filed a grievance.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-06 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Social Services Director and Social Services Assistant met the qualification requirements as stipulated by the regulation. This failure had the potential to result in misidentification or mishandling of residents' cases which can lead to poor interventions and lack of support for all residents.Findings: During an interview on 3/4/26 at 2:37 PM with Social Services Director (SSD), SSD stated she had15 years of social service experience but no degree, just high school diploma. SSD stated she worked full time and oversees the facility's social services department. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/5/26 at 11:09 AM with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), SSD's Employee File was reviewed. The file indicated SSD has a high school diploma. DSD stated SSD had a performance evaluation completed by the Facility Administrator on 6/2/25. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/5/26 at 11:03 AM with the Human Resources Director (HRD), SSD's Position History was reviewed. The history…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-06 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program (the facility's program for identifying problems and improving resident care) addressed concerns related to social services staffing qualifications, including the lack of a qualified Social Services Director (SSD) and Social Services Assistant (SSA), as part of the facility's ongoing assessment and performance improvement activities. The QAPI program failed to identify and address this concern.This failure had the potential to limit the facility's ability to identify and address systemic issues (problems that affect more than one resident or area of the facility) related to psychosocial services (services that support residents' emotional and social needs), discharge planning, and resident support services, potentially impacting the quality of care and services provided to residents.During an interview on 3/4/26 at 2:39 PM with Social Services Assistant (SSA), SSA stated she had no degree, just a high school diploma. SSA stated she started as full-time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-06 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program (the facility's program for identifying problems and improving resident care) to ensure resident and family complaints were consistently identified, documented, tracked, and analyzed through the QAPI process.This failure had the potential to prevent the facility from identifying systemic issues (problems that affect more than one resident or area of the facility), implementing corrective actions, and improving the quality of care and services provided to residents.On 03/04/2026 at 12:00 PM during a reviewed Facility Grievance Log there were only three grievances listed since March 2025. The log did not indicate what the grievance was about, the actions taken by the facility to investigate, a conclusion, the remedies the facility took to resolve the grievance, nor the date a written response was sent to the resident or representative. On 03/05/26 at 4:00 PM, during an interview with the Grievance Committee consisting of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 61 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that allegations of abuse and injuries of unknown origin were reported to the State Agency for three of 33 sampled residents (Resident 49, 22, and 153).This failure resulted in delay in initiation of an external investigation and ensure residents' safety and resident-to-resident abuse to go uninvestigated and leave vulnerable residents unprotected from further abuse. Findings: 1. During an observation on 3/2/26 at 4:20 PM in the Memory Care Unit, Resident 49 was observed with red and purple bruising on her right upper and lower eyelids and bridge of nose. When resident was asked how she obtained the injury to her face, the resident appeared confused and unable to respond to the question. During an interview on 3/2/26 at 4:25 PM with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6. LVN 6 stated that she did not know how Resident 49's injury happened. She stated the injury was first noted on 2/27/26. During an interview on 3/3/26 at 10:50 AM with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program for 6 of 33 residents when:1.Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 obtained vital signs (pulse rate, temperature, respiration rate, and blood pressure) without disinfecting the equipment between use for Resident 100 and 93.2. CNA 1 did not wear a gown while providing toileting assistance to Resident 11 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-gown and glove use to reduce spread of infection).3. Oxygen concentrator filters for Residents 6, 69 and 83 were observed covered with lint.These failures had the potential to increase the risk of cross-contamination and the spread of infection within the facility.1.During an observation on 3/2/26 at 2:33 PM in Resident 100's room, CNA 2 was observed obtaining Resident 100's vital signs. After completion, CNA 2 did not disinfect the blood pressure cuff or pulse oximeter and proceeded to obtain vital sign for Resident 93 using the same equipment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate discharge planning with the receiving facility and communicate with the resident and resident's responsible party (RP) for one of 33 sampled residents (Resident 122). In addition, the facility failed to ensure the discharge care plan reflected the residents' goals and resident specific interventions. This failure resulted in facility staff, Resident 122, and the resident's responsible party not being aware of the resident's discharge plan. Findings: Resident 122 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included weakness and unsteadiness on feet. During an interview with Resident 122, on 3/5/26 at 8:37 AM, Resident 122 stated she was doing much better and wanted to move to an assisted living facility (ALF- residential housing for seniors or individuals with disabilities who need help with daily care). Resident 122 stated she has been waiting for a very long time and has no idea what was going on with her move. During an interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer insulin (medication used to lower blood sugar) within professional standards, when Lispro Insulin (fast acting insulin) was administered to one of 33 sampled residents (Resident 111) one hour prior to a meal. This failure had the potential to cause adverse outcome from hypoglycemia (a condition in which blood glucose concentration is below 70 mg/dl (unit of measurement) or harm to the residentFindings: Review of the admission Record indicated Resident 111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which includes Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Ketoacidosis (a serious health condition when the body can't make enough insulin). During an interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 on 3/4/2026 at 12 PM, LVN 1 was asked if she would be checking Resident 111's blood sugar prior to lunch. LVN 1 stated that she had already checked Resident 111's blood sugar at 11:00AM and administered Lispro Insulin to the resident.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective pain management was implemented for Resident 151 when:1.The as needed pain medication (Tylenol) for Resident 151 was not administered according to the physician's order.2. Resident 151's pain level was not assessed timely post-administration of the as needed pain medication.These failures had the potential to result in Resident 151's suffering and decreased mobility due to unresolved pain.Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 151's admission Record, from 1/15/26 showed that Resident 151 was first admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including right knee pain. During a review of Resident 151's Quarterly MDS/CAA (Minimum Data Set/Care Area Assessment: a comprehensive and mandatory nursing home assessment process utilized to evaluate a resident's functional, medical, and psychosocial status) dated 12/4/24, indicated that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS: a standardized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely store, and label drugs and supplies in accordance with acceptable standards of practice when: One of two treatment carts was left unlocked and unattended on station 3.Personal food items were stored in one vaccine refrigerator. This failure had the potential to allow unauthorized access to treatment supplies by residents, staff, or visitors and maintain a controlled and sanitary environment for the storage of vaccines. 1.During an observation on 3/3/26 at 8:35 AM, Station 3's treatment cart was observed across the nurses' station. The treatment cart was unlocked and unattended. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/3/26 at 8:46 AM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, the treatment cart remained located across from the nurses' station against the wall and was still unlocked and unattended. LVN 2 acknowledged the treatment cart had been left unlocked and stated the cart should be locked when unattended to prevent unauthorized access. During a concurrent interview and record review on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety standards were met when: 1.A linear black substance was found inside the ice machine in the kitchen.2. Two open bags of pasta and one open cornstarch were found in the kitchen unlabeled and undated and were not stored in an airtight container.3. One unlabeled and undated partially consumed bottled drink was found inside the resident's nutrition refrigerator at Station 2.4. One unlabeled and undated partially consumed frozen yogurt was not found inside the resident's nutrition freezer at Station 2.5. [NAME] 1 covered his mustache while preparing food in the kitchen.These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses to all residents.Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Preventing Foodborne Illness - Food Handling, dated July 2014, the P&P indicated, Food will be stored, prepared, handled and served so that the risk of foodborne illness is minimized . 1. This facility recognizes that the critical factors implicated in foodborne illness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident call system was operational and accessible when;1. The call light system in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom was observed with missing required pull cord, preventing the residents from summoning staff assistance when needed.2. The call light system in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom had missing call button preventing the residents from summoning staff assistance when needed.This failure had the potential to prevent residents from summoning staff assistance in a timely manner, placing residents at risk for unmet needs, accidents, or injuries.Findings:1. During an observation on 3/2/26 at 2:45 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom, the call light system was observed with missing pull cord.During an interview on 3/3/26 at 2:50 PM with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3, CNA 3 confirmed the call light pull cord was missing.2. During an observation on 3/2/26 at 3 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom, the call light system…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physical environment was maintained in safe, clean and well maintained when;1. room [ROOM NUMBER] walls had large scuff marks present on the room walls and bathroom walls.2. room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom vinyl flooring was lifted at the bathroom entrance.The facility's failure to maintain resident living areas in good repair had the potential to create an unsafe environment and increase the risk of trips, falls, or other injuries for residents, staff and visitors.Findings:1. During an observation on 3/2/26 at 2:20 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], multiple large scuff marks and visible damage on the walls were observed. The wall surfaces appeared worn and need of repair.2. During observation on 3/2/26 at 2:45 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], the vinyl flooring in the resident bathroom was lifted and separating from the floor surface near the bathroom entryway. The raised vinyl flooring created an uneven surface.During a concurrent observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on physician orders for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a left leg arterial duplex (ultrasound used to visualize blood flow in arteries) and venous duplex (ultrasound used to visualize blood flow in the veins) was not done. These failures resulted in a delay of treatment.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN-completed by the vascular physician [physician that specialized in diagnosis, treatment, and management of conditions affecting the arteries, veins, and lymphatic vessels]) dated 11/6/25, the PN indicated, Treatment.Suspect both CVI (chronic venous insufficiency-leg veins struggle to pump blood back to the heart due to damaged or weak valves) and PAD (peripheral arterial disease-narrowed arteries reduce blood flow to your limbs).Will get arterial and venous duplex studies at facility.During a review of Resident 1's PN dated 11/6/25 at 3:38 p.m., the PN indicated, Resident returned from appt. (appointment) at (vascular physician name) .Resident has new orders from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess, notify the physician and treat a change of condition for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's left foot 2nd toe was swollen, had drainage coming from it and dry crusty debris covering the top of the toe and the nail bed. These failures resulted in a delay of care and the potential for Resident 1's foot to worsen. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/14/25 at 10:49 a.m. with Resident 1 in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was lying on bed with her feet exposed. Resident 1's left foot appeared swollen, there were debris between the toes, a circular dried scab/skin on the inside of the foot, and the second toenail bed and top of the toe was covered with a lumpy and bumpy debris (cauliflower in appearance) that was dry, yellow, and crusty in appearance.During a review of Resident 1's Shower/Bed Bath Sheet (SBBS) dated 8/7/25 (7 days prior to the observation), the SBBS indicated, CNA: identify any skin issues.healing scab on left foot (top).Licensed Nurse: Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to reevaluate wounds when the treatment orders were ending for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in worsening of Resident 1's wounds and going untreated.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN) dated 6/25/25 at 4 p.m. the PN indicated, Resident is sitting up in w/c (wheelchair) just arrived from (hospital name) appointment.skin assessment done, noted to have dry blood on the left foot sock, removed sock to left foot 2nd toe left toe noted nail is not intact and 2nd toe is bleeding, left 2nd toe nail was smashed, and nail is off from nail bed, notify MD (doctor of medicine).cleanse with NS (normal saline), pat dry apply bacitracin (antibiotic ointment) very (sic) shift, leave open to air. Cleanse skin tr=ear (sic) to left lateral (side of the body part) foot, pat dry, apply bacitracin every shift, monitor for infection and worsening shift x14 days, follow up with wound Dr.During a review of Resident 1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated 7/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders when there was no referral to the wound care doctor and treatment was not provided to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when it was ordered by the podiatrist. This failure resulted in Resident 1's wound going untreated and had the potential for Resident 1's wound to worsen. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Podiatry Evaluation (PE) dated 6/2/25, the PE indicated, Wound of foot.The patient presently has a wound of the lower extremities. A dressing was applied today. Nursing was notified of the presence of the wound. Will defer wound management to the wound care MD (Doctor of Medicine). If recommendations for wound care are requested from a podiatry standpoint please reconsult specifically for that reason.wound x1 noted to left dorsal (back part of the body part) forefoot measuring 3x3 cm (centimeters-a unit of measurement).During a concurrent interview and record review, on 9/3/25 at 11:11 a.m. with Treatment Nurse (TN) 1, Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed. TN 1 was unable to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change of condition for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's wound worsened. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience a delay in care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP) dated 2/19/25, the CP indicated, (Resident 1) is at risk for skin breakdown related.skin tears.Interventions.Check skin during daily care provisions. Notify physician of abnormal findings. During an observation on 5/29/25 at 11:25 AM in the hallway, Resident 1 had steri-strips (small adhesive strips used to close small wounds) to her right arm near the elbow. There was green drainage (often indicating infection) noted to the wound that could be seen on the steri-strips. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 5/29/25 at 1:10 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated when she was checking Resident 1's right arm on 5/28/25 (one day prior) she noticed there was a green drainage coming from Resident 1's wound. LVN 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 1) physician's orders were followed. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving a dose of intravenous (IV - used to administer medications directly into the vein) antibiotics (used to treat infection) and the potential for Resident 1's urinary tract infection to worsen. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Physician's Orders (PO), the PO indicated, Ceftriaxone (antibiotic).use 1 gram (unit of measurement) intravenously one time a day for urinary tract infection for 7 days.start date 5/8/25. During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP) dated 5/7/25, the CP indicated, Infection: Resident is at risk for complications related to Urinary Tract Infection and dehydration ceftriaxone.Interventions.Medication per physician's order. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/15/25 at 3:13 p.m. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 5/25 was reviewed. The MAR indicated Ceftriaxone was not administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based an interview and record review, the facility failed to permit one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to return to the facility after hospitalization. This resulted in Resident 1 having unnecessary stay in the hospital and violated Resident 1's rights. Findings: During an interview on 3/19/25 at 3:12 p.m. with acute hospital Social Worker (SW), SW stated on 3/19/25 she notified facility to inquire whether they would be permitting Resident 1 to return to the facility. SW stated she was made aware facility was not permitting Resident 1 to return to the facility. During an interview on 3/19/25 at 4:22 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated on 3/13/25 she was not able to hold any food down and had severe abdominal pain and requested to be sent to the acute hospital. Resident 1 stated she feels better and would like to return to the facility. Resident 1 stated, I'm comfortable there [facility]. I want to go back, I've made friends there. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 3/20/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adult protective services (APS) was notified for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was discharged from the facility home alone, when staff had concerns for her safety due to Resident 1's cognitive status. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 having unmet care needs and being put at risk for harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Discharge Summary (DS), dated 1/17/25 at 12:05 p.m., the DS indicated, discharge date .1/23/25.Discharge location.home.Activity status.moderate assist (assistance) (50% of the effort being performed by staff) .Bed mobility.moderate assist.Transfer.substantial/maximum assist (75% of the effort being performed by staff).Dressing.moderate assist.Bathing.moderate assist.grooming and hygiene.moderate assist.toilet use.moderate assist.Incontinent-Bladder.yes.Incontinent-Bowel.yes. During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP), dated 12/2/24, the CP indicated, Cognitive impairment: Resident exhibits cognitive loss.Interventions/Task.Anticipate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — widespreadHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure advance directives (AD- A legal document that states a person's wishes about receiving medical care if that person is no longer able to make medical decisions) were offered and completed for 20 of 36 sampled residents (Resident 113, Resident 73, Resident 411, Resident 128, Resident 104, Resident 135, Resident 2, Resident 111, Resident 77, Resident 312, Resident 311, Resident 81, Resident 51, Resident 68, Resident 313, Resident 36, Resident 101, Resident 43, Resident 109, and Resident 84). This failure had the potential for residents' healthcare wishes to not be honored. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/29/25 at 11:41 a.m. with Social Services Assistant (SSA), Resident 113 AD was reviewed. The AD indicated, 1. I have executed an Advanced Directive Yes blank No blank 2. I have provided the center a copy of my Advanced Directive Yes blank No blank 3. I will bring in a copy of the Advanced Directive for the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained and equipment was in good repair in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. The dishmachine and ice machine manufacturer's guidelines were not followed related to lack of a floor drain and lack of proper air gap to prevent the backflow of potentially contaminated water into the clean water supply. 2. Floor sink drains related to a steamer and hand washing sink were not maintained in a sanitary manner and in good repair in which pooled water could attract pests such as insects and rodents. 3. Clean foodservice equipment was stored on shelves with scattered dried food debris. 4. The foodservice operation lacked cleaning with detergent prior to sanitizing of food contact surfaces. These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination and foodborne illness for 159 highly susceptible residents receiving food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/27/25 at 10:43 a.m. with Maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control policies and procedures (P&P) as evidenced by: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) did not follow the facility P&P) titled Administering Medications to administer medications in a clean and sanitary manner for two of two residents (Resident 66 and Resident 143). This failure had the potential to result in infection and illness for Resident 55 and Resident 143. 2. Infection Preventionist (IPN), did not follow the facility P&P titled Surveillance for Infection and Monitoring Compliance with Infection Control for surveillance (monitoring) activities, collecting, analyzing, track and trending of data. This failure had the potential for facility to be unaware of outbreaks and the transmission of infectious diseases. 3. Nursing Staff did not follow the facility P&P titled Department (Respiratory Therapy) - Prevention of Infection.) for dating, storage and discarding of tubing for one of one sampled residents' (Resident 1) respiratory tubing. 4. Housekeeping (HK) staff did not follow the facility P&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-03 · tag F0943 — widespreadGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse [inappropriate treatment of an individual], Neglect [refusal to provide the needs of the resident], Exploitation [taking improper advantage of an individual], and Misappropriation [misuse, stealing from a resident] Prevention Program, annual training for the following: 1. 17 of 73 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), CNA 1, CNA 2, CNA 33, CNA 4, CNA 5, CNA 6, CNA 7, CNA 8, CNA 9, CNA 10, CNA 11, CNA 12, CNA 13, CNA 14, CNA 15, CNA 16, and CNA 17), 2. Seven of thirty one sampled Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN), LVN 4, LVN 15, LVN 6, LVN 10, LVN 8, LVN 19, LVN 100, 3. Four of twelve sampled Dietary Aids (DA), DA 1, DA 2, DA 3, DA 4, 4. Two of four sampled cooks, [NAME] 1, [NAME] 2, 5. Two of twenty Feeding Assistants (FA) FA 1, FA 2, 6. One of three sampled Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) SLP, 7. One of two sampled Respiratory Therapist (RT) 1, 8. One of six sampled Restorative Nursing Assistants (RNA) 1, 9. Two of three sampled Occupational Therapist (OT) 1 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-03 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (OSLTCO-independent advocate who helps protect the rights of residents) a Notice of Transfer when: 1. Facility transferred three of three sampled residents (Resident 51, Resident 68, Resident 127) to a local hospital and 2. Facility discharged (transfer without expectation of return to facility) one of one sampled resident (Resident 159) to a local hospital. These failures denied Resident 51, Resident 68, Resident 127, and Resident 159 immediate access to an advocate who could inform of transfer or discharge options and resident rights. Findings: 1a. During an interview on 1/27/25 at 11:48 a.m. with Resident 51, Resident 51 stated she was hospitalized in June 2024 for abdominal (stomach) abscess (a collection of pus or infected fluid surrounded by inflamed tissue) that spread to her hips and legs. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/30/25 at 10:23 a.m. with Assistant Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-03 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy & procedure (P&P) Binding Arbitration Agreement (BAA - a way to resolve disputes between healthcare providers and residents) for four of four sampled residents (Resident 62, Resident 134, Resident 101, and Resident 135) when: 1. admission Director (AD) did not explain the BAA to two of four sampled residents (Resident 62 and Resident 134) in a manner that he or she understood, before signing the agreement. 2. AD did not document a verbal acknowledgement of the BAA from four of four sampled residents (Resident 62, Resident 134, Resident 101, and Resident 135). This failure resulted in Resident 62, Resident 134, Resident 101, and Resident 135 not being fully aware and informed of their rights if there was a dispute with the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/28/25 at 4:36 p.m. with Resident 62, Resident 62's, BAA form, dated 10/14/24 was reviewed. The BAA indicated, Resident 62 had signed the BAA form. Resident 62 stated he remembers signing the form but, he did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a functioning wall light was provided in a resident's room for one of six sampled residents (Resident 139). This failure had the potential to compromise the safety of the resident. Findings: During an observation on 1/27/25 at 11:07 a.m. in Resident 139's room, there was a light on the wall above Resident 139's bed that did not turn on and the string to turn on the light was detached. During an interview on 1/27/25 at 11:09 a.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSD stated she just found out right now that the string to pull to turn on the light was detached and the light was broken. DSD stated she does not know how long it had been out of service. During an interview on 1/27/25 at 11:13 a.m. with Maintenance Supervisor (MS), MS stated he was not aware Resident 139's light was broken. MS stated the light should be working for Resident 139's use. During a record review of the facility's DEPARTMENTAL MAINTENANCE WORKSHEET (DMW),'' dated 1/25/25, the DMW indicated, LOCATION OF DEFICIENCY BE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written information on bed-hold (holding a resident's bed during hospitalization) for two of two sampled residents (Resident 51 and Resident 68). This failure had the potential to create uncertainty for Resident 51 and Resident 68 to return to the facility and return to their previous rooms. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/30/25 at 10:53 a.m. with Admissions Director (AD), AD stated in the facility's admission packet there was a form that discussed bed-hold upon admission. AD stated before the resident was sent out, the nurse should inform the resident and/or resident representative about a bed-hold. AD stated if the resident and/or resident representative decided to take the bed-hold, the doctor would order a seven-day bed-hold for the resident to be able to return to the facility. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/30/25 at 10:59 a.m. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Resident 51's medical record (MR) was reviewed. The MR indicated Resident 51 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool) Resident Matrix (MDSRM), was accurate and up to date for two of six sampled residents (Resident 135, and Resident 152). This failure had the potential for Resident 135 to have unmet care needs and inaccurate medical records for both Resident 135, and Resident 152. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 135's, MDSRM, dated 1/27/25, the MDSRM indicated, Resident 135 was on Transmission based precaution (TBP-set of infection control measures). During an interview on 1/27/25 at 11:32 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse, (LVN) 5, LVN 5 stated Resident 135 does not use oxygen or have a breathing type of device. During an interview on 1/28/25 at 5:05 p.m. with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), MDSC stated that is a coding error because Resident 135 is not on TBP. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/29/25 at 9:53 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 135's, MDS Sections J and O, dated 11/18/24 was reviewed. The Section J…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Baseline Care Plan (BCP - an initial person-centered care plan within the first 48 hours of admission that provide instructions for care of the resident) Summary for three of three newly admitted sampled residents (Resident 311, Resident 312, and Resident 313). This failure had the potential for Resident 311, Resident 312, and Resident 313 to not receive the care and the safeguards necessary within the first 48-hours of admission. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/29/25 at 10:28 a.m. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Resident 311's admission Record (AR) was reviewed. The AR indicated Resident 311 was admitted on [DATE]. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/29/25 at 10:30 a.m. with ADON, Resident 311's BCP summary, dated 1/13/25, was reviewed. The BCP summary indicated, The resident and/or the resident representative participated in the baseline care plan review with a printed/written summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Doctor (MD) reviewed and countersigned a verbal order (VO) for two of two sampled residents (Resident 101 and Resident 127). This failure had the potential for the nurse to not properly follow the VO for Resident 101 and Resident 127. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/29/25 at 4:15 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 9, Resident 127's Nurse's Note (NN), dated 12/19/24 was reviewed. Resident 127's NN indicated, upon assessment Resident 127 had crackles (indicates fluid in small airways) in the right lung, diminished (no sound or dull sound) breath sounds heard in the left lung with difficulty breathing. Resident 127 was on oxygen at 3 Liters. MD ordered Resident 127 sent out to the hospital. LVN 9 stated she notified the MD of Resident 127's condition. LVN 9 stated MD gave a verbal phone order to send resident out to hospital. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/29/25 at 4:20 p.m. with LVN 9, Resident 127's Medical Record (MR) was reviewed. LVN 9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 81) when nursing staff did not provide personal grooming and hygiene. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 81's lowered self-esteem and the potential make Resident 81 susceptible to disease and/or infection. Findings: During an observation on 1/28/25 at 9:46 a.m. in Resident 81's room, Resident 81 sat on his bed, still wearing a hospital gown. Resident 81's hair was long and had not been combed. Resident 81's facial hair, moustache and beard were long. Resident 81's fingernails were long and had blackish substance inside the tips of all the fingernails. Resident 81 stated, I needed to be shaved. My fingernails also needed to be trimmed. I am waiting for the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to trim my nails. During an interview on 1/28/25 at 10 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1 in Resident 81's room, RN 1 stated [Resident 81] had not been showered. RN 1 stated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 84) in Hospice Care (end of life care) received care and treatment for the edema (swelling) on both the legs when: 1. Weekly Nursing Assessments did not indicate Resident 84 had edema. 2. After Hospice Nurse (HPN) notified Medical Doctor (MD), MD did not provide treatment orders for Resident 84's edema. These failures resulted in Resident 84's not receiving the necessary services, treatment and quality of care needed for the swelling in both her legs. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/28/25 at 8:44 a.m. with Hospice Nurse (HPN) and Registered Nurse (RN) 1, in Resident 84's room, Resident 84 was sitting up in bed. Both of Resident 84's legs had pitting (when pressure is applied to the swollen area, an indentation [pit] remains) edema. HPN stated Resident 84 was dependent, and unable to do things for herself. HPN stated Resident 84's legs were edematous. RN 1 stated Resident 84 was not receiving any medications for her edema. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient communication between the facility's Registered Dietitian (RD) 1 and RD 2 employed by the dialysis center related to provision of lunch meal in a safe manner for one of one sample resident (Resident 139) who received dialysis three times a week. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 139's lunch to contain Time Temperature Control for Safety (TCS - food that requires time-temperature control to prevent the growth of bacteria) foods to include a turkey or tuna sandwich had inadequate monitoring of time/temperature control for food safety which placed Resident 139 at an increased risk for a foodborne illness. Findings: During a review of Resident 139's Resident Information, dated 2/3/25, Resident 139 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis Dependent on Renal Dialysis. During an interview on 1/27/25 at 12:09 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 10, LVN 10 stated Resident 139 left the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) on Resident Rights, for one of six sampled residents (Resident 106) did not receive routine dental services. This failure had the potential for poor eating and broken or lose teeth to go unnoticed. Findings: During an observation on 1/27/25 at 1:11 p.m. in Resident 106's room, Resident 106 did not have teeth. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/30/25 at 3:35 p.m. with Social Services Assistant (SSA), Resident 106's Order Summary (OS), dated 6/1/24 was reviewed. The OS indicated, consult dental for oral hygiene with follow-up and treatment. SSA stated Resident 106's dental referral was missed. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Resident Rights, dated 9/2009, the P&P indicated, e. choose[sic] a physician and treatment and participate in decisions and care planning.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Provide the therapeutic diet as ordered for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 311) when: a. Resident 311 was served his nectar-thick (thickness of milkshake) drink and house nourishment after sitting out at room temperature for approximately five (5) hours on 1/27/25. b. Resident 311's meal tray did not have 8 fluid ounces (fl. oz) nectar-thick punch drink for lunch on 1/27/25. These failures had the potential for Resident 311 to not meet the nutritional requirements due to decreased palatability (tastiness). Findings: 1a. During an observation on 1/27/25 at 12:30 p.m. in Resident 311's room, Resident 311 was laying in bed. Two sippy cups, full of liquid, were on the nightstand, on the left side of Resident 311's bed. Neither sippy cup was within Resident 311's reach. Resident 311 was non-verbal (did not speak). Resident 311 had no teeth and constantly smacked his lips. Resident 311's left hand was contracted (unable to straighten due to shortening of tendons and muscles). During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Honor resident's food preferences for two of 13 sampled residents (Resident 28, and Resident 51). This failure resulted in an unpleasant dining experience due to the facility serving both Resident 28 and Resident 51 food listed as disliked and Resident 28 not receiving soup under her standing orders. 2. Ensure one of seven sampled residents (Resident 51) was aware of the menu in time to request an alternative menu item. This failure had the potential for Resident 51's nutritional needs to not be met. 3. Provide alternative milk product for one of one sampled residents (Resident 311) who had lactose (milk sugar) intolerance (unable to digest). This failure had the potential for Resident 311 to not meet his nutritional requirements. Findings: 1a.During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/27/25 at 12:42 p.m. with Resident 28 in the dining room, there were uneaten chili beans on Resident 28's meal tray. Resident 28 stated she disliked beans. Resident 28 stated, she had a standing order for chicken…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0912 — isolatedProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the minimum square footage as required by the regulation for 11 of 50 of the facility rooms. Findings: During an observation on 1/29/25 at 12:04 p.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER], there were three residents in the room. Bed A had a wheelchair parked at the right side of the bed and Bed C had a wheelchair parked in form of the closet. During an observation on 1/29/25 at 3:14 p.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER], there were three residents in the room. Bed B had a walker and side table at the right side of the bed and Bed C had a side table to the right side of the bed. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/30/25 at 8:42 a.m. with Administrator and Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the facility's Rooms Not Meeting Required Square Footage (RNMRSF), undated was reviewed. The RNMRSF indicated the following rooms did not provide the minimum square footage (Sq ft.) as require by regulation (80 Sq ft. per resident) for multiple resident rooms:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) call light was within Resident 1's easy reach. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not received assistance when needed. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/2/24, at 12:10 p.m. in Resident 1's room, Resident 1's call light (a communication device used to alert staff for assistance) was noted on the floor not within Resident 1's reach. Resident 1 stated he uses the call light to call for staff assistance. Resident 1 started looking for his call light, using his hands to feel under his back, bottom area, above head, and on the bed side rails. Resident 1 was unable to locate his call light. Resident 1 stated, Oh well, it's not here. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/2/24, at 12:17 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1), in Resident 1's room, CNA 1 confirmed Resident 1's call light was on the floor not within Resident 1's reach. CNA 1 stated Resident 1's call light should always be within reach. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0837 — isolatedEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure (P&P) when an outbreak of scabies (a contagious, intensely itchy skin condition caused by a tiny, burrowing mite) was not reported to the state health department for three of fourteen sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3). This failure resulted in the state health department being unaware of the outbreak. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Integumentary Assessment Sheet (IAS), dated 8/8/24, the IAS indicated, Pt (patient) seen exam bedside with generalized pruritic (having or causing itching) maculopapular (flat, discolored area of skin and raised bumps) rash with some tracking without burrowing and ddx (differential diagnosis) scabies. During a review of Resident 2 ' s IAS, dated 8/8/24, the IAS indicated, Pt seen exam bedside with generalized pruritic rash tracking to trunk and upper extremities and ddx of scabies. During a review of Resident 3 ' s IAS, dated 8/8/24, the IAS indicated, Pt seen exam bedside with generalized pruritic maculopapular rash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a psychiatrist (medical practitioner specializing in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness) referral was made for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in a delay of the psychiatrist evaluation for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Psychologist Consultation/Follow-Up (PCF), dated 4/9/24, the PCF indicated, Resident alert with confusion, has tendency to wander take others property believing it is hers, behaviors increase at night. Consider re-starting Seroquel (medication used to treat several kinds of mental health conditions) . During a review of Resident 1's IDT (interdisciplinary team-knowledge from different health care disciplines to help people receive the care they need) Psychotherapeutic Review (IPR), dated 4/12/24, the IPR indicated, IDT does not agree with considering to re start medication used prior to admission. IDT recommends that (Resident 1) be referred to a psychiatrist for further evaluation. IDT reviewed recommendations with (Primary MD) who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the bed linen was not in good repair. This failure resulted in Resident 1's bed sheet having a hole and two areas where the sheet was discolored due to the thinning of the sheet. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/16/24 at 12:15 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 had a hole at the bottom of her bed sheet and an area of discoloration caused by thin and tattered threads on the side of the bed sheet. CNA 1 stated the sheet was thinning and identified the hole at the bottom of the sheet. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/16/24 at 1 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 had two areas on her bottom bed sheet that were thinning and discolored. LVN 1 stated the sheets were thin, and it was causing the discolored areas. During an interview on 5/29/24 at 12:29 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a Family Member (FM) 1 made Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 aware of the allegation of abuse. This failure had the potential for delayed investigation and place other residents at risk for abuse. Findings: During an interview on 5/16/24 at 8:40 a.m. with FM 1, FM 1 stated over the weekend (approximately 4-5 days earlier), she reported to Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 every time a male staff (unidentified) walked by Resident 1 would say he hits me. During an interview on 5/16/24 at 11:56 a.m. with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated When there is an allegation of abuse the allegation was to be reported (to the management) right away. During an interview on 5/16/24 at 1 p.m. with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated approximately two weeks ago, Resident 1's FM had reported to her Resident 1 seemed upset when a male staff would work with her. Resident 1 would say the male staff would hit her. LVN 1 stated she did not report the allegation. During an interview on 5/16/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide podiatry services for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure resulted in Resident 1 and Resident 2 having long, jagged, discolored toenails. Findings: a. During an observation on 5/16/24 at 12:03 p.m. in the hallway, Resident 2 was walking in the hallway with opened toe sandals. Resident 2's toenails were long and discolored. During a review of Resident 2's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 5/20/24, the OSR indicated, Consult – Podiatry as needed for Mycotic (disease caused by a fungus)/Hypertrophic (alteration of shape, partial loss, or absence of the nail) nails and/or keratotic (patches or lesions on the outer layer of the skin) lesions.order date 2/13/23. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/16/24 at 2:21 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON reviewed Resident 2's clinical record and was unable to provide evidence Resident 2 had received podiatry care. DON stated the facility staff does not provide toenail care and relies on the podiatrist. b.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician in a timely manner when one of three sampled resident's (Resident 1) continued to experience a change in condition. This failure resulted in a delay of care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's ED [Emergency Department] Note Physician (EDNP), dated 2/2/24 at 4:02 p.m. the EDNP indicated, Chief Complaint.Abdominal pain.Final Diagnosis.Abdominal Pain.Nausea.Hx (history) of gastric bypass (weight loss surgery).small bowel obstruction (digested material is prevented from passing normally through the bowel). During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN), dated 1/31/24 at 3 p.m. the PN indicated, Resident had 2 episodes of emesis (vomiting) and meal refusal for breakfast and lunch. Resident complained of abd (abdominal) pain to left upper quadrant and mid abdomen. Placed call to [Physician 1] and gave new orders: Stat (immediately) CBC (complete blood count-measures many different parts and features of the blood) & CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel-provides important information about balance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1's wounds to worsen. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR), dated January 2024, the TAR indicated, Monitor right heel diabetic ulcer (serious complication caused by a combination of poor circulation, susceptibility to infection and nerve damage from high blood sugar levels) daily for 1. Pain/discomfort, 2. s/s (signs and symptoms) of infection. Every day shift.start date 1/12/24.Monitor right lower back stage 3 (full thickness tissue loss wound caused by pressure) daily for 1. Pain/discomfort, 2. s/s of infection. Every day shift.start date 1/12/24.Monitor sacrococcygeal (base of the spine near the tailbone) DTI (deep tissue injury) daily for 1. Pain/discomfort, 2. s/s of infection. Every day shift.start date 1/12/24.Right heel diabetic ulcer treatment: wipe with betadine swab. Every day.start date 1/11/24.Right lower back stage 3 treatment: Cleanse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bowel movement (BM) documentations were completed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in incomplete documentation. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review with Director of Nursing (DON), on 5/30/24 at 12 p.m. Resident 1's BM Report (BMR), undated, was reviewed. The BMR indicated, Resident 1 had no BM documentation on 1/15 and was incontinent of BM on 1/10, 1/11, 1/13, and 1/16. There was no consistency or size of BM documented on 1/10, 1/11, 1/13 and 1/16. DON stated the BM documentations were incomplete. DON stated the size and consistency of the BM should have been documented. During an interview on 5/7/24 at 12:30 p.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSD stated she was responsible for training the staff on how to document BM's. DSD stated the staff should have documented whether the resident was continent or incontinent, the consistency of the BM and the size. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Bowel Management…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided supervision when staff failed to respond to a security door alarm going off in the dementia (progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking) unit. This resulted in Resident 1 exiting the open security gate that provided access off of the facility grounds and being found approximately a quarter of a mile away from the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Plan of Care (POC), dated 8/22/22, the POC indicated, Elopement Care Plan. [Resident 1] is at risk for elopement/exiting seeking due to: altered cognitive status (dementia).date initiated: 8/22/22.interventions.monitor resident's whereabouts frequently.provide redirection to resident as needed. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 2/14/24, the AR indicated, admission Date 3/13/2018.Diagnosis Information.Unspecified dementia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided a safe environment when there was exposed staples from a missing drawer face on Resident 1 ' s night stand. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to be injured by the exposed staples. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 1/12/24 at 11:22 a.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, in Resident 1 ' s room, there was a nightstand at the head of Resident 1 ' s bed. The face of the top drawer was missing and there was exposed staple legs on the right side, where the face was supposed to be attached. CNA 1 stated, she noticed the face of the drawer was missing a few weeks ago, when she returned from her days off. CNA 1 stated, when items need to be repaired, they are supposed to write them in the maintenance log at the nurses station. CNA 1 stated, when she returned everyone was aware, so she did not put it in the maintenance log. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 1/12/24 at 11:41 a.m., with Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the responsible party (RP) was notified when medication was discontinued for one of three residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in the RP being unaware of a change in Resident 1 ' s medical care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 11/23, the MAR indicated, Quetiapine Fumarate (used to treat mental health condition) Tablet 50mg (milligrams-unit of measure) take 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime. The MAR indicated the medication was last administered 11/15/23. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Progress Notes (PN), dated 11/14/23 at 11:27 a.m., the PN indicated, IDT (Interdisciplinary Team-a group of health care professionals with various areas of expertise who work together toward the goals of their clients) Note.Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at which time he was receiving Quetiapine.Since his admission, resident has displayed no episodes of delusional thinking, therefore,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 9 of 66 sampled residents' (Resident 147, Resident 126, Resident 11, Resident 136, Resident 79, Resident 78, Resident 144, Resident 35, and Resident 61) information regarding Advanced Directives (AD - a legal document that states a person's wishes about receiving medical care if that person is no longer able to make medical decisions because of a serious illness or injury) was provided. This failure had the potential to result in Resident's being unable to make decisions about their medical care. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/6/23 at 3:15 p.m. with Social Service Director (SSD), Resident 147's Facility Supplemental Documentation (Advanced Directive - [FSD-AD]), form dated 11/15/23 was reviewed. The FSD-AD form was blank with only the residents signature. SSD stated the form is blank and it should have been completed with the residents wishes. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/6/23 at 3:33 p.m. with SSD, Resident 126's Consent to Treat(CTT), form dated 10/17/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure six of six sampled Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN 1, LVN 2, LVN 3, LVN 4, LVN 5 and LVN 6) had annual competency (measurable pattern of knowledge, skills and abilities an individual needs to perform occupational functions successfully) evaluations. This failure had the potential to result in nursing staff to not have specific skills and training needed to care for resident needs. Findings: During an interview on 12/6/23 at 8:54 a.m. with LVN 2, LVN 2 stated she is not sure how often competencies are checked. LVN 2 stated competency check are done randomly. During an interview on 12/6/23 at 9:17 a.m. with LVN 3, LVN 3 stated she does not remember when her last competency evaluation was performed. During an interview on 12/6/23 at 9:27 a.m. with LVN 4, LVN 4 stated she does not remember when her last competency evaluation was performed. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/7/23 at 10:51 a.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), LVN 1's employee file (EF) was reviewed. DSD stated there were no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop for 3 of 66 sampled residents' (Resident 136, Resident 73, and Resident 24) an individualized care plans when: 1. Resident 136 did not have an activities Care Plan (CP). 2. Resident 73 did not have a refusal CP. 3. Resident 24 did not have a CP indicating the use of bedrails. These failures had the potential for Resident's to not receive care specific to their preference or choice. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 136's Progress Notes (PN), dated 11/17/23 at 5:00 p.m. the PN indicated, [Family Member (FM)] provided with room number and informed [Resident 136] currently has no roommates. [FM] expressed concern regarding resident [Resident 136] being in room without doing any activities to keep him busy. During concurrent interview and record review on 12/7/23 at 9:46 a.m. with Director of Activities (DOA), Resident 136's Care Plans (CP), were reviewed. DOA stated there was no activities CP for Resident 136. During a review of Resident 136's Activities Assessment (AA), dated 6/12/23, the AA indicated it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Follow physician's orders (PO) for one of 66 sampled resident's (Resident 129) when Resident 129's blood sugars (BS) were not monitored and documented. This failure had the potential to result in unmet care needs and adversely affect resident's health. 2. Obtain a physician's order for one of 66 sampled resident's (Resident 120) when Resident 120 was administering oxygen (O2 A chemical element needed to breath) to himself. This failure had the potential for Resident 120 to receive the incorrect dose of oxygenation, which can adversely affect her health condition. 3. Obtain a physician's order for bedside rails for one of 66 sampled resident's (Resident 24). This failure had the potential to result in injuries and unmet care needs. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 129's admission Record (AR), dated 12/7/23, the AR indicated, Resident 129 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 66 sampled residents (Resident 73) was assisted with oral care. This failure resulted in Resident 73 having dental issues and tooth decay. Findings: During an interview on 12/5/23 at 1:00 p.m. with Responsible Party (RP) 1, RP1 stated, Prior to admission he [Resident 73] had a full set of his own teeth, and now the front teeth are chipping. During an observation on 12/5/23 at 3:16 p.m. in Resident 73's room, Resident 73's teeth had plaque (A sticky film that coats teeth and contains bacteria. Dental plaque can damage a tooth and lead to tooth decay or tooth loss. Regular brushing can help prevent plaque) build up, a yellowish discoloration, and chipped upper front teeth. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/5/23 at 3:19 p.m. with Certified Nursing (CNA) 2, in Resident 73's room, Resident 73's teeth had plaque buildup, a yellow discoloration and chipped upper front teeth. CNA 2 stated, No his [Resident 73] teeth do not look clean, I have attempted [to brush], but he refuses. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was scheduled and in the facility for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven day per week. This failure had the potential to adversely affect resident care. Findings: During an interview on 12/6/23 at 8:45 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated she is not sure if there is an RN who works on the floor eight hours per day. During an interview on 12/6/23 at 9:03 a.m. with LVN 2, LVN 2 stated, We only have [DON-Director of Nursing], we don't have any other RN who works in this facility. During an interview on 12/6/23 at 9:17 a.m. with LVN 3, LVN 3 stated, [DON] is the only RN that I am aware of that works in this facility. During an interview on 12/6/23 at 9:27 a.m. with LVN 4, LVN 4 stated Monday through Friday they have the DON. LVN 4 stated there is a part time RN who works occasionally, but there is no RN coverage on weekends. During an interview on 12/6/23 at 9:35 a.m. with LVN 7, LVN 7 stated there are no RN's working in the facility except for the DON. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 66 sampled residents' (Resident 136) was placed on contact precautions after receiving a contagious infection diagnosis. This failure had the potential to result in the spread of infection to residents, staff and visitors. Findings: During an observation on 12/5/23 at 8:43 a.m. in Resident 136's room, Resident 136 was laying in bed on his right side, with blankets pulled up to his chin and both feet sticking out. Resident 136's feet were covered with multiple raised red bumps. During a review of Resident 136's Minimum Data Set (MDS-assessment tool), Section C Cognitive Patterns, dated 9/8/23, the MDS indicated Resident 136 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0, indicating Resident 136 was severely cognitively (mentally) impaired (score of 0-7 suggests severe cognitive impairment). During a review of Resident 136's Care Plan (CP), dated 11/9/23, the CP indicated Resident 136 had been diagnosed with Scabies (skin infection with severe itching caused by burrowing mites).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0912 — isolatedProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, this facility failed to provide the minimum square footage as required by the regulation in 50 of the facility bedrooms. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/5/23 at 9 a.m. with Administrator and Maintenance Supervisor (MS) in the facility, the following rooms did not provide the minimum square footage (sq. ft) as required by regulation (80 sq. ft. per resident) for multiple resident rooms: 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,18,19,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63. Administrator stated the residents have not complained about in the room size. Although the facility did not provide the minimum square footage as required by regulation, variations in the rooms. the rooms were in accordance with the particular needs of the residents. Closet and storage space was adequate. Bed stands were available. There was sufficient room for nursing care and for the residents to ambulate. The health and safety of the residents would not be affected by the waiver.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 66 sampled residents (Resident 42) call light system was properly working. This failure had the potential for Resident 42's care needs to be unmet. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/5/23 at 8:17 a.m. with Resident 42, in Resident 42's room, Resident 42 stated the call light had not been working for three days. Resident 42 pressed her call light and the light outside of Resident 42's room did not come on. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/5/23 at 8:19 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 in Resident 42's room, CNA 1 pushed Resident 42's call light button and the light outside of Resident 42's room did not come on. CNA 1 unplugged and plugged the call light cord back into the wall connection. CNA 1 stated the call lights plug was not pushed in. CNA 1 stated Resident 42 and her roommate both have their own call light cord, but they share the wall outlet that the cords plug into. CNA 1 stated sometimes when they give patient care to Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor, assess, document, and notify a change in condition for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was left outside of the facility for a prolonged period of time. This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling hot and had the potential for Resident 1 to experience heat stroke (body overheating). Findings: During an observation on 9/8/23 at 11:20 a.m. in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was sitting in his wheelchair. Resident 1 was unable to be interviewed. During an interview on 9/8/23 at 11:20 a.m. with Family Member (FM) 1, FM 1 stated Resident 1 made his family aware staff left him outside and got too hot. FM 1 stated, My dad [Resident 1] told me the staff were checking him over and asking him how he was feeling [after being left outside for unknown period of time]. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - assessment tool), dated July 17, 2023, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 10 (score of 8-12 means moderately cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) wheelchair was free of debris. This resulted in Resident 1 using a dirty wheelchair and the potential for spread of bacteria. Findings: During an observation on 8/21/23 at 11:09 a.m., in the outside patio, Resident 1 was observed sitting in [Resident 1's] wheelchair. The wheelchair had brown debris on the wheelchair seat, frame, and the wheels. During an interview on 8/21/23 at 11:17 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1), CNA 1 stated the residents wheelchairs should be cleaned weekly. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/21/23 at 11:28 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), in the outside patio, Resident 1's wheelchair was observed. LVN 1 stated, Resident 1's wheelchair was gross [it] looks like cornflakes stuck to it where the footrest go. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/21/23 at 11:48 a.m. with Housekeeping Director (HD), in the outside patio, Resident 1's wheelchair was observed. HD stated Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed for one of three residents (Resident 1) refusal of care. This failure had the potential for staff to not know how to provide care to Resident 1 when refusing. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Dental Notes (DN) dated, 8/11/23, the DN indicated, Tx [treatment] notes.Refused. During a review of Resident 1's Shower Day Skin Inspection (SDSI) sheets, dated 7/7/23, 7/11/23, 7/18/23, 8/15/23 and one undated indicated, Resident 1 had refused to shower. During an observation on 8/21/23 at 10:46 a.m. with Resident 1, in the outside patio, Resident 1 was observed sitting in [Resident 1's] wheelchair at a picnic table. Resident 1's fingernails were long and had brown debris under them. During an observation on 8/21/23 at 11:28 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 asked Resident 1 if she could clip [Resident 1]'s fingernails. Resident 1 refused to allow LVN 1 to clip [Resident 1]'s fingernails. During an interview on 8/21/23 at 11:35 a.m. with Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Podiatrist (doctor that treats the feet) recommendation for a pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) was followed upon for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in a delay in care for Resident 1 and the potential for Resident 1 to experience worsening of the pressure ulcer. Findings: During a review of the Podiatry Evaluation (PE), dated 8/19/23, the PE indicated, Treatment.Pressure ulcer, ankle, left, unstageable (pressure ulcer when a stage is not clear).Notes: The wound appears stable and should heal with local care. Plan of care should be daily betadine application and offloading with pillows. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/8/23 at 10:31 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, LVN 2 reviewed Resident 1's clinical record and was unable to find any treatment or monitoring to Resident 1's pressure ulcer. During an observation on 9/8/23 at 11:10 a.m. with LVN 2, in Resident 1's room,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide the minimum square footage required by regulation for 11 of 50 resident rooms.During an observation on 3/3/26 at 10:01 AM, resident rooms 41-51 did not meet the required minimum square footage of 80 square feet per resident.room [ROOM NUMBER]: 227.2 sq. ft. (3 residents)room [ROOM NUMBER]: 219.2 sq. ft. (3 residents)Rooms 43-51: 234.5 sq. ft. (3 residents)During an interview on 3/6/26 at 9:15 AM with the Administrator (Adm), the resident room size waiver was discussed. The Adm acknowledged that rooms 41-51 did not meet regulatory requirements.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$13,870 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $13,870 — penalty dated 2026-05-21
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-06-30 for 3 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUDSON RIVER OPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/05/2021 |
| BAY BRIDGE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/05/2021 |
| HASNAIN, ABBAS | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/01/2022 |
| HUBBARD, ANITA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/12/2024 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $910K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055604. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.