No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Westgate Gardens Care Center

4525 W. Tulare Ave., Visalia, CA 93277 · For profit - Corporation · 140 certified beds · (559) 733-0901 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (559) 733-0901 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609) — most recent Jun 20251 actual-harm citation$10,317 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $10,317 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-15)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
840 S Akers St
Pharmacy
5328 W Cypress Ave · (559) 741-9583 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2245 S Linwood St · (559) 622-3212 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Tulare Ave · (559) 713-4365 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.2%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.6%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.9%1.2%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.5%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.2%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.5%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.6%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.3%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.8%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.7%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.0%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.282.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.831.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 361 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.58U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.6%CMS range 54.1–65.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.3%CMS range 6.9–12.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge61.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 5.5–10.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.431.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.32
RN hours/ resident / day
1.16
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.65
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.13
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
45.3%
Total nursing turnover
0.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 134.4 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-24)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff used the Hoyer lift (mechanical device designed to assist individuals with limited mobility in safely transferring from one place to another) properly when the legs (base) of the Hoyer lift were not open during a transfer for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in the Hoyer lift tilting over causing Resident 1 to fall to the floor, sustaining a mild displaced (bone fragments are no longer together) distal (away from the point of attachment) coccygeal (tailbone) segment (completely detached from surrounding bone) fracture (break in a bone).Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) dated 6/10/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia (loss of impairment of motor (movement of body parts) and sensory (sensation) functions in the lower half of the body).neuralgia (nerve pain) and neuritis (inflammation of a nerve).congestive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure care plan was implemented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 request for No Male Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to provide care. This failure resulted in violation of Resident 1's rights and potential for emotional harm.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan Report (CPR), dated [DATE], the CPR indicated, Focus RESIDENT IS REQUESTING NO MALE CNAS. Goal REQUEST WILL BE MET. Intervention FEMALE CNAS TO PROVIDE CARE.During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 11:28 a.m. in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was sitting in a wheelchair. Resident 1 stated a male staff had gone in her room in the middle of the night and provide care for her. Resident 1 stated, I don't like men around me.During an interview on [DATE] at 1:04 p.m. with Director of Nurses (DON), DON stated CNA 1 (male staff) had provided care for Resident 1 on [DATE] and [DATE].During a concurrent interview and record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure confidentiality for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when the wrong Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST-form contains full name, birthdate, and treatment preference) was printed and given to Emergency Medical Services (EMS). This resulted in violation of Resident 1's rights.Findings:During an interview on 4/6/26 at 8:04 a.m. with Resident 2's Responsible Party (RP), RP stated on 3/24/26 during the process in transferring Resident 2 to the acute hospital, Licensed Vocation Nurse (LVN) had given EMS the wrong residents POLST form. Resident 2's RP stated the POLST given to EMS was for Resident 1 and not for Resident 2.During an interview on 4/9/26 at 11:40 a.m. with LVN, LVN stated on 3/24/26 during the process in transferring Resident 2 to the acute hospital, a copy of Resident 2's POLST form was requested and received from Medical Records Assistant (MRA). LVN stated she did not verify the POLST form was for Resident 2 before giving it to EMS. LVN stated she was not aware the POLST received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0917 — isolated
    Make sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean mattress for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1). This resulted in Resident 1 sleeping on a stained mattress and potential for skin irritation and respiratory issues.Findings:During an interview on 2/17/26 at 10:39 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN), LVN stated on 2/8/26 Resident 1's Low Air Flow mattress (a therapeutic medical device) had a dark, brown circle stain. LVN stated the mattress stain did not look appealing. it should have been changed.During an interview on 2/17/26 at 11 a.m. with Director of Nurses (DON) and Director of Housekeeping (DOH), DON and DOH reviewed a photo of Resident 1's mattress taken on 2/8/26. DON and DOH confirmed Resident 1's mattress had a dark brown stain. DON and DOH stated the mattress should have been removed and replaced.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Homelike Environment dated 2001, the P&P indicated, Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for cognition (a mental process of knowing and understanding) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who had impaired cognition. This failure had the potential for staff unaware of Resident 1's cognitive impairment and not having his needs met.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 12/23/2025, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 has diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease (brain disorder that slows you down and makes you shake) and panic disorder (recurring, unexpected, sudden, and intense episodes of fear with physical symptoms like a racing heart, shortness of breath, and dizziness, often feeling like a medical emergency). During a review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a quick, 15-point test used in nursing homes to get a snapshot of someone's thinking and memory by asking them to recall words, identify the date/place, and remember those words later, helping staff spot potential cognitive decline and know when to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Attending Physician (AP) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's scheduled dialysis (a medical procedure that filters the blood of a person whose kidneys are not functioning properly) treatment was missed. This failure had the potential for fluid retention and adverse outcome. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 7/2025, the AR indicated Resident 1 had a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (irreversible kidney failure) . Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 7/2025 indicated, Hemo Dialysis thru LUE (Left Upper Extremity) at (dialysis center name) on T (Tuesday), TH (Thursday), SAT (Saturday) at 0400 AM till 0700 AM.During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN), dated 7/26/25 at 9:56 a.m., the PN indicated, . Dialysis. Resident (Resident 1) did note [sic] attend r/t (related to) transport did not come pick up resident.During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/5/25 at 1:34 pm. with Director of Nurses (DON), DON reviewed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure transportation was provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 missing hemodialysis treatment (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) and potential for serious health risks and even death.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 7/2025, the AR indicated Resident 1 had a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (irreversible kidney failure) . Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 7/2025 indicated, Hemo Dialysis thru LUE (Left Upper Extremity) at [dialysis center name] on T (Tuesday), TH (Thursday), SAT (Saturday) at 0400 AM till 0700 (AM).During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN), dated 7/26/25 at 9:56 a.m., the PN indicated, . Dialysis. Resident (Resident 1) did note [sic] attend r/t (related to) transport did not come pick up resident.During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/5/25 at 1:34 pm. with Director of Nurses (DON), DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0837 — isolated
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their own policy and procedure for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a gait belt was not used for a transfer. This failure resulted in Resident landing on her bed face down.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 6/20/25, the MDS indicated, Functional Abilities.chair/bed-to-chair transfer.03 (Partial/moderate assistance-helper does less than half the effort. Helper lifts, holds or supports trunk or limbs, but provides less than half the effort.During a review of the Facility Reported Event (FRE) dated 6/24/25, the FRE indicated, Describe incident: During a transfer the resident expressed that the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and LVN (Licensed Vocational Nurse) had a rough transfer.Full investigation was completed and CAN (sic) and LVN did not transfer the resident appropriately.During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN) dated 6/24/25 at 9:32 a.m., the PN indicated, Resi (Resident) told LN (Licensed Nurse) that around 03:30 AM today…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its own policy when an allegation of abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was not reported to Ombudsman, law enforcement, and state licensing agency. This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for abuse. Findings: During a review of the admission Record (AR) dated 6/12/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses.metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction due to metabolic [chemical changes that take place in a cell or an organism] disorder).dementia (impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgement).hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis ( muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs, and facial muscles) following cerebral infarction (blood flow to the brain is blocked, causing brain tissue to die) affecting right dominant side. During a review of Resident 1's Cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the care plan for one of five sampled residents (Resident 4) when staff witnessed Resident 4 invading Resident 5's personal space looking angry and aggressive and did not intervene. This failure resulted in Resident 4 cussing at and hitting Resident 5 on the left leg. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's Care Plan (CP) dated 11/26/24, the CP indicated, Has episodes of being verbally abusive behaviors r/t (related to) poor impulse control.Interventions/Tasks.gentle redirection when applicable. During a review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized, comprehensive assessment tool to evaluate the status of residents) dated 4/8/25, the MDS indicated, BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status - used to assess knowledge, manipulation of information, and reasoning with score ranging from 0 - 15. The higher the score the more intact the resident's cognition is) Summary Score.09 (moderately impaired cognitive status) .Behavior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) home health services were set up prior to discharge. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 not receiving the assistance and care she needed upon discharge. Findings: During a review of the Physicians Orders (PO), the PO indicated, Discharge home (resident ' s address) with HH (Home Health), PT (Physical Therapy), OT (Occupational Therapy), RN (Registered Nurse) DME (Durable Medical Equipment): 2 WW (Wheel Walker) .order date 5/8/25 During a review of the Discharge Summary (DS), the DS indicated, discharge date and Time: 5/9/25.Reason for discharge.Resident discharging home.Discharge location.home.post-discharge services/referrals.home health.services ordered.PT.OT.RN.post-discharge supply needs.durable medical equipment.FWW (front wheel walker). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Progress Notes (PN) dated 5/9/25 at 10:55 a.m., the PN indicated, Residents brother (name) here to transport resident home via personal vehicle upon discharge. During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was evaluated to self-administer medication when lidocaine (medication used to relieve pain) was left at the bedside. This failure resulted in Resident 1 having medication at bedside and the potential to self-administer medication incorrectly. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/7/25 at 11:10 a.m. with Resident 1 in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was holding a washcloth up to her mouth and appeared in pain. There was a medication cup with a clear gel looking substance on Resident 1's over bed table. Resident 1 stated she had a bad tooth, and was provided the lidocaine in the medication cup from the nurse so she could use it when she was in pain. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/7/25 at 11:18 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 in Resident 1's room, LVN 1 stated the medication cup that was on Resident 1's over bed table contained lidocaine. LVN 1 stated when a resident was to self-administer medication an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman (government-appointed official who investigates and attempts to resolve complaints in the long-term care facility) was notified when one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided a 30-day notice to discharge the facility for non-payment. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience an inappropriate discharge. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Notice of Proposed Transfer/Discharge (NPTD) dated 3/11/25, the NPTD indicated, Reason(s) for transfer/discharge: non-payment of share of cost assigned by medi-cal. You have failed, after reasonable and appropriate notice, to pay for your stay at the facility. If you became eligible for Medi-cal after admission to the facility the facility may charge you only allowable charges under Medi-cal.4/9/25 effective date of transfer/discharge.(signature of facility representative).3/12/25.(signature of Resident 1).3/12/25. During an interview on 3/28/25 at 12:23 p.m. with Administrator, Administrator stated Resident 1 was issued a 30-day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directives (AD-a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) were offered and completed for two of 32 sampled residents (Resident 19 and Resident 103). This failure had the potential for residents' healthcare wishes to not be honored. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/20/25 at 9:25 a.m. with Nursing Consultant (NC), NC was unable to provide documentation of an AD for Resident 19. NC stated there is no AD on file or no documentation of AD being offered or discussed with Resident 19 or Resident 19's responsible party. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/24/25 at 11:28 a.m. with Social Services (SS), Resident 103's Advance Directive (AD), dated 6/06/24 was reviewed. The AD indicated, on 6/06/24 Resident 103 was interested in executing an AD. SS stated Resident 103 had checked that he was interested in the AD per the paperwork and there was no documentation on file that it was followed up. During a review of Resident 103's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-24 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its arbitration agreement explicitly indicated that the resident or his or her representative had the right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar days of signing the arbitration agreement. This failure had the potential for 92 of 138 residents who signed arbitration agreements not to understand their right to rescind the arbitration agreement within 30 days. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/24/25 at 9:30 a.m. with the Admissions Director (AD), the facility's list of current residents who signed arbitration agreements was reviewed. A review of the list of current residents who signed arbitration agreements indicated 92 of 138 residents had signed it. The AD stated the facility offered arbitration agreement to all its residents. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/24/25 at 11:34 a.m. with the Administrator, the facility's Arbitration Agreement (Agreement) (undated) was reviewed. The Agreement indicated, This Agreement may be rescinded by written notice within thirty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-24 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document the attendance of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee meetings during ten of 12 meetings in 2024. This failure prevented the verification of attendance of the required QAPI committee members (Administrator, Director of Nursing, Medical Director, and Infection Preventionist). Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/24/25 at 3:22 p.m. with the Administrator, the facility's QAPI committee meeting minutes (the minutes) for 2024 were reviewed. The minutes indicated monthly meetings during 2024 but attendance sheets only for the November 2024 and December 2024 meetings. There was no documentation of who attended the meetings held from January 2024 to October 2024. The Administrator stated the facility started documenting the attendance of QAPI committee meetings in November 2024. The Administrator stated there was no documentation of who attended the meetings from January 2024 to October 2024. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Quality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 12 sampled residents (Resident 97, Resident 34, and Resident 13) were treated with dignity when they had to wait up to two hours for their call light request to be answered. This failure resulted in residents experiencing discomfort and feeling upset and the potential for skin breakdown. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/19/25 at 7:48 a.m. with Resident 97 in Resident 97's room, Resident 97 was sitting up in bed. Resident 97 stated the longest she's waited for staff to answer her call light was approximately two hours for someone to help her and she needed her brief to be changed because she had soiled her brief. Resident 97 stated she needs two people to help her change her brief. Resident 97 stated, It made me feel like crap. During a review of Resident 97's admission Record, (AR) dated 3/28/24, the AR indicated Resident 97 had a diagnosis of Unspecified Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for two of 64 sampled residents (Resident 42 and Resident 101). This failure had the potential to result in residents' needs not being met. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/18/25 at 10:14 a.m. with Resident 42 in Resident 42's room, the call light was tied to the right side rail close to the top of the bed. When Resident 42 was asked how she would call for assistance, Resident 42 tried to reach the call light but could not. Resident 42 stated she could not reach the call light. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/18/25 at 10:15 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 in Resident 42's room, Resident 42's call light tied to the right side rail close to the top of the bed. CNA 1 stated Resident 42 could not reach the call light. CNA stated the call light should be within reach. During an observation 2/18/25 at 10:19 a.m. in Resident 101's room, Resident 101's call light was attached to the bed and not within reach. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a functioning overhead light was provided for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 37). This failure resulted in Resident 37 to not have a light available for personal use. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/18/25 at 9:44 a.m. with Resident 37 in Resident 37's room, there was a light on the wall above Resident 37's bed, the string to turn on the light was detached. Resident 37 stated she has been unable to turn on the light and the string had been broken for a couple of weeks. During a review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set [MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool], dated 1/30/25, the MDS indicated Resident 37 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 11 (score of 8-12 means moderate cognitive impairment). During an interview on 2/18/25 at 9:57 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, LVN 2 stated the string to turn on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow one of eight sampled residents (Resident 103) care plan for smoking. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 103 to not meet his psychosocial (a person's well-being) needs. Findings: During a review of the facility's Smoking Times and Location (STL), (undated), the STL indicated, Smoking Times are 9:00 a.m. - 9:10 a.m. (CNA St [station] 1), 11:00 a.m. - 11:10 a.m. (CNA St 2), 1:15 p.m. - 1:25 p.m. (CNA St 3), 4:30 p.m. - 4:40 p.m. (CNA St 2), 8:00 p.m. - 8:10 p.m. (CNA St 3). Resident will need to be by the smoking door ready to go out at smoking times. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/19/25 at 10:44 a.m. with Resident 103 in Resident 103's room, Resident 103 was dressed and lying in bed. A wheelchair was parked on the left side of bed. Resident 103 stated, No one has come to offer to get me ready for a smoke break. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/19/25 at 11:07 a.m. with Resident 103 in Resident 103's room, Resident was dressed and still lying in bed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled for one of seven residents (Resident 83) when two of Resident 83's medications were labeled with the wrong type of insulin and the wrong resident's name. These failures had the potential for Resident 83 to receive the wrong insulin, another resident's insulin or another resident to receive a medication without a physician order. Findings: During a review of Resident 83's admission Record (AR), dated 2/24/25, the AR indicated Resident 83 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (inability to control blood sugar levels). During a review of Resident 83's Order Details (OD), order date 11/21/24, the OD indicated the following medication order: HumaLOG Kwikpen Subcutaneous [under the skin] Solution Pen-Injector 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Lispro) [a fast acting insulin] Inject subcutaneously before meals for DM [Diabetes Mellitus]. During a review of Resident 83's OD, order date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of eight sampled residents (Resident 93 and Resident 103) meal consumption percentages were documented accurately. This failure had the potential to resulted in Resident 93 and Resident 103 to experiencing unplanned weight loss or weight gain. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/18/25 at 11:41 a.m. with Resident 93, Resident 93 was sitting in bed eating her lunch in her room. Resident 93 stated, There has not been anything on the food menu that has been tasteful. I end up with those chicken nuggets all the time and I am tired of it. I have never eaten 80% of my meals. During a review of Resident 93's Minimum Data Set [MDS - a resident assessment tool] Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident], dated 12/18/24, the MDS indicated Resident 93's BIMS was 15 [13-15 able to make decisions for self]. During an observation on 2/18/25 at 12:24 p.m. in Resident 93's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written report of an allegation of sexual abuse to the proper authorities for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This violated Resident 1 and Resident 2's rights. Findings: During an interview on 1/28/25 at 9 a.m. with Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes), Ombudsman stated they did not receive an SOC 341 (a required form used to report suspected abuse of dependent adults and elders) from the facility regarding the allegation of sexual abuse between Resident 1 and Resident 2. During a review of Resident 2 ' s Progress Notes (PN), dated 1/12/25 at 2:06 p.m., the PN indicated, Writer made aware by CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) that resident [Resident 2] was found in between station 2 & 3 inappropriately touching a female resident [Resident 1]. During an interview on 1/29/25 at 12:05 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN), LVN stated on 1/12/25 at approximately 12:45 pm, CNA was passing in between stations when Resident 2 was observed with his hands on top of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was implemented for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when non-skid strips were not placed on the bathroom floor after a fall. This failure had the potential to result in further falls. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's care plan (CP), dated 1/11/24, the CP indicated, Fall in restroom [ROOM NUMBER]/22/24.interventions/tasks.non skid [sic] strips on restroom floor.date initiated: 12/23/24. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/2/25 at 1:57 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 in Resident 1's restroom, there were no non-skid strips on Resident 1's restroom floor. CNA 1 confirmed there were no non-skid strips on the restroom floor. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/2/25 at 2:10 p.m. with Maintenance Director (MD), in Resident 1's restroom, there were no non-skid strips on the restroom floor. MD stated he was responsible to put the non-skid strips on the restroom…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly resolve one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) grievance when Resident 1 requested for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) to not return to his room and provide care. This failure resulted in violation of Resident 1 ' s rights and potential for emotional distress. Findings: During an interview on 9/6/24 at 11:11 a.m. with CNA 2, CNA 2 stated on 8/26/24, after CNA 1 had provided care for Resident 1 and left the room, Resident 1 reported being uncomfortable with CNA 1 and requested for CNA 1 to not return to his room and care for him again. CNA 2 stated she immediately reported Resident 1 ' s request to the nurse on-duty (License Vocational Nurse-LVN). During an interview on 9/6/24 at 12:20 p.m. with CNA 1, CNA 1 stated when he went back to work on 8/30/24, he was assigned to provide care for Resident 1. CNA 1 stated Resident 1 yelled at him stating, I don ' t want you in here. During an interview on 9/9/24 at 10:14 a.m. with LVN, LVN stated on 8/26/24, CNA 2 had reported Resident 1 not being comfortable with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician when there was a change in the discharge plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in the physician being unaware of Resident 1's transfer to the hospital. Findings: During a review of the Physician Order (PO) dated 5/9/24 (two days prior to discharge) at 1:44 p.m. the PO indicated, [Physician 1]; Resident to discharge on [DATE] with HH [home health], PT [physical therapy] OT [occupational therapy] RN [registered nurse], wound nurse, HHA [home health aide], msw [master of social work], NOMNC [notice of Medicare non-coverage] LCD [last covered day] 5/10. During a review of Resident 1's PN, dated 5/10/24 at 4:15 p.m. the PN indicated, SS office spoke with Rp (responsible party).informing her resident NOMNC appeal was denied. RP informed SS discharge plan is a request for resident to be sent out to [hospital name] . During a review of Resident 1's PN, dated 5/11/24 at 2:13 p.m. the PN indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise and implement an appropriate plan of care for falls for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to cause serious harm. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/26/24 at 11:57 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1 ' s Electronic Medical Record (EMR), was reviewed. The EMR indicated Resident 1 had a fall in which he hit his head on 3/16/24. Resident 1 was sent to the acute hospital and returned with an acute (new) to subacute (not new) fracture (break) of L3 (lumbar-area of the spine). DON stated Resident 1 had previous falls in the facility including a fall earlier in the month (no specific date given). DON stated Resident 1 can walk but is generally confused. During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission RECORD (AR), dated 3/26/24, the AR indicated Resident 1 diagnosis including Shortness of breath, Hypotension (low blood pressure), Abnormality (abnormal) of gait and walking, Unspecified Dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was implemented when the call light was not within reach for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to be unable to call for assistance. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP), dated 1/5/24, the CP indicated, Falls: Resident is at risk for falls with or without injury.Intervention/Tasks.Keep call light within reach.Date initiated.1/5/24. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/17/24 at 2:28 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was lying in bed. The call light push button was clipped to the call cord where it was attached to the wall. CNA 1 unclipped the call light and placed it on top of Resident 1's abdomen where he could reach it. When Resident 1 was asked what the call light push button was used for, Resident 1 stated it was used when he needed help. CNA 1 stated Resident 1 could not reach the call light push button when it was clipped to the wall, and it should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) were provided a pest free environment when a spider and spider webs were on the bedroom furniture. This failure resulted in an unclean environment. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/25/23, at 3:30 p.m., with Administrator, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was lying in A bed. Over B bed, noted a spider on the ceiling, spider webs under a metal chair in the corner of the room, and under two night stands there were spider webs, and one night stand had a living spider in the web. Administrator stated the resident rooms should have been cleaned everyday by the housekeeper. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/25/23, at 4:16 p.m., with Environmental Services Supervisor (EVS), in Resident 1's room, EVS stated in Resident 1's room, there was a recent repair done to a hole in the wall and when it was being repaired there were dead spiders noted in the room. EVS stated when the housekeepers cleaned the rooms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to clean and appropriately store one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) bed pan. This failure had the potential for contamination and the spread of infection. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/25/23 at 12:37 p.m. with Central Supply (CS) in Resident 1's room, a used uncovered bed pan was found in Resident 1's drawer. CS stated the used bed pan should have been cleaned and wrapped in a plastic bag before storing in Resident 1's drawer. During an interview on 7/25/23 at 1:35 p.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSD stated, Bed pan were to be clean after each use, placed in a plastic bag, and stored in residents drawer. During an interview on 7/27/23 at 9:56 a.m. with Director of Nurses (DON), DON stated, the facility did not have a specific policy on bed pan storage. DON stated, it was the facility's practice to clean a bed pan after use, place in a plastic bag, and place inside resident drawer for storage.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired foods were not available to be served when there was molded Hawaiian rolls and expired rice vinegar in the dry food storage area. This had the potential to be served to the residents and cause food borne illness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 7/14/23, at 8:28 a.m., with Director of Dietary Services (DDS), in the kitchen dry storage room, the bread storage area contained two packages of Hawaiian rolls. Each package contained 12 Hawaiian rolls for a total of 24 Hawaiian rolls. Out of 24 Hawaiian rolls approximately 18 had mold on them. DDS stated, 18 out of 24 of the Hawaiian rolls were molded and they should have been thrown out. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 7/14/23, at 9:44 a.m., with DDS, in the dry food storage area, there was a bottle of rice vinegar that had an expiration date of 6/23/23. DDS stated, the rice vinegar should have been thrown out. During a review of the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Storage of Food and Supplies…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was served a palatable meal. This resulted in Resident 1 eating a molded hamburger bun. Findings: During an interview on 7/14/23, at 8 a.m., with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated, two days prior (7/12/23) she received a hamburger bun on her meal tray that was molded. Resident 1 stated, the area of mold was approximately the size of a fingernail and she could smell the mold on the hamburger bun. During an interview on 7/14/23, at 9:44 a.m., with Director of Dietary Services (DDS), DDS stated, Resident 1 had received an alternate food item that was served on a hamburger bun. DDS stated, the hamburger bun Resident 1 was provided was molded. DDS stated, the molded bun should have been caught by the cook that served the sandwich and it should have been thrown out. During a review of the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Food and Nutrition Services dated 10/2017, the P&P indicated, Each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an Advance Directive (AD-health care preferences, including decisions for end-of-life care) acknowledgement form was completed for nine of 13 sampled residents (Resident 13, Resident 71, Resident 64, Resident 106, Resident 33, Resident 17, Resident 66, Resident 70, and Resident 82). This failure had the potential for the licensed staff to be unaware of the desired medical treatment when residents' are no longer able to make decisions in the event of an emergency. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 4/18/23, at 11:05 AM, with Medical Records Assistant (MRA), Administrative Assistant (AA), and Regional Consultant for Clinical Services (RCCS), Resident 13's medical record was reviewed. MRA, AA, and RCCS were unable to find a completed AD acknowledgement form. RCCS stated, It's [AD acknowledgement form] not there. During a review of Resident 71's admission Packet (AP), dated 1/20/22, the AP indicated, that AD did not have questions about whether Resident 71 had an AD, wanted information about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-20 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer promptly three of five sampled residents (Resident 17, Resident 41, Resident 108) for a level II mental health services as indicated in the positive pre-admission screening and resident review report I (PASRR Level I identifies if an individual has a suspected Mental Illness [MI] or an intellectual/Development Disability or Related Condition [ID/DD/RR]. It's an evaluation data requirement to determine whether a resident with mental illness requires specialized services). This failure had the potential for residents to decline in their mental capacity and not receive specialized services. Findings During a review of Resident 17's admission Record (AR), dated 4/19/23, the AR indicated, Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Schizophrenia, Unspecified (a serious mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally) and Bipolar Disorder, unspecified (a mental illness that causes dramatic shifts in a person's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was less than 5% for three of 14 sampled residents (Resident 36, Resident 45, Resident 335). This failure had the potential for adverse health outcomes related to incorrect medication administration. Findings: During an observation on 4/19/23, at 7:38 AM, outside Resident 36's room, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 11 prepared Resident 36's medications. LVN 11 crushed all of Resident 36's medications scheduled for 8 AM including Protonix (medication used to reduce stomach acid), then administered them to Resident 36. During a review of Resident 36's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 4/19/23, the OSR indicated, Resident 36 had an order for Protonix Tablet Delayed Release 40 MG [milligrams, unit of measure] The OSR indicated, an order May crush medications unless contraindicated [not indicated] During an observation on 4/19/23, at 7:58 AM, with LVN 11, in Resident 45's room, LVN 11 gave Resident 45 his Breo Ellipta inhaler (inhaled medication used to open airways) to self…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure medications were properly labeled and stored in one of three sampled medication carts (Cart 2). This failure had the potential to result in medications being administered to the wrong resident and not being stored in accordance with manufacturers recommendations. 2. Ensure that controlled substances were stored in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations. This failure had the potential to result in drug diversion (transfer of a legally prescribed controlled substance from the individual for whom it was prescribed to another person for illegal use). 3. Maintain the recommended temperature range for medications stored in one of two medication refrigerators. This failure had the potential to result in medications losing their effectiveness. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/18/23, at 9:06 AM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4, at the medication cart on Station 2, an unlabeled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure professional standards for food service safety and sanitary kitchen conditions. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illness (illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) for at-risk vulnerable residents. Findings: During an observation on 4/17/23, at 10:04 AM, in the kitchen, [NAME] 1 was washing hands in the 3-compartment sink(requires 3 separate sink compartment that wash, rinse and sanitize) that had dirty trays and utensil cookware close to the preparation area for the egg salad lunch menu item. During an interview on 4/17/23, at 11 AM, with Dietary Manager (DM), DM stated, the staff should use the designated hand washing sink and not wash their hands in the 3-compartment sink. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/17/23, at 10:56 AM, with Dietary Aide (DA) 1, in the kitchen, DA 1 was washing dirty pots, serving pans, and cookware utensils in the 3-compartment sink. DA 1 stated, the pots, serving trays, and cookware utensils were air drying after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices when: 1. Used linens were not handled correctly for one of one sampled resident (Resident 92). 2. Handwashing was not performed before and after treatment/procedure for two of two sampled residents (Resident 9 and Resident 107) These failures had the potential for the spread of infections to residents, staff and visitors. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/17/23, at 9:39 AM, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, in Resident 92's room, a pile of bed linen was noted on the floor. CNA 1 stated, the linens were dirty and should not be on the floor. CNA 1 stated, dirty linen should have been placed in a bag. During an interview on 4/17/23, at 9:53 AM, with the Infection Preventionist (IP), IP stated, when the clothing or linen is removed from the resident or bed, it should be placed in a clear bag. IP confirmed the finding and stated, They should not be placed on the floor. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physicians of a change in condition for two of two sampled residents (Resident 74 and Resident 33). This failure had the potential for a delay in appropriate patient care for Resident 74 and Resident 33. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/18/23, at 12:30 PM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 tested Resident 74's blood sugar and blood sugar results were 366 milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL, unit of measure, normal range 70-100mg/dl). LVN 1 asked Resident 74 if she wanted to take her insulin (medication used to lower blood sugar), Resident 74 refused the insulin. LVN 1 stated, Resident 74 had refused her insulin for several days. LVN 1 stated, if residents refused three or more medications in a row, the facility should inform the physician and the responsible party. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 4/19/23, at 10:32 AM, with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 74's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 4/2023, was reviewed. The MAR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to routinely assess depression (mental illness marked by persistent sadness and a lack of interest or pleasure in previously rewarding or enjoyable activities) for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 66). This failure had the potential for Resident 66's depression to go untreated. Findings: During an interview on 4/18/23, at 10:25 AM, with Family Member (FM) 1, FM 1 stated, Resident 66 was diagnosed as having depression but was taken off anti-depressant medication about a year ago. FM 1 stated, she felt her mom still had depression. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 4/19/23, at 11:20 AM, with Medical Records Assistant (MRA), Resident 66's clinical record was reviewed. Medical Diagnoses included Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent [multiple episodes of depression of varying lengths]. The Psychotropic [medications that affect a person's mental state] Gradual Dose Reduction [decreasing the dosage or discontinuing a medication] (GDR) Review form, dated 1/25/22, at 2:11 PM, indicated, Resident 66's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- assessment to ensure facility services are appropriate for people with mental illness, developmental disabilities, substance abuse disorders, or have a conservator) was completed for one of one sampled resident (Resident 70). This failure had the potential for not providing the appropriate care and treatment to Resident 70. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 4/20/23, at 12:17 PM, with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 70's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Screening Document (PASRRLID), dated 5/19/20, was reviewed. The PASRRLID indicated, Level I - Negative and Section V - Mental Illness 26. Does the resident have a diagnosed mental disorder such as Schizophrenia [mental illness characterized by delusions and hallucinations]/Schizoaffective Disorder [schizophrenia with depressed or manic mood changes], Psychotic/Psychosis, Delusional Depression, Mood Disorder, Bipolar, or Panic/Anxiety? Neither Yes of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one visually impaired resident (Resident 82) was properly oriented to her meal tray and hot drink. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 82's dignity and for her to accidentally spill her hot drink on herself. Findings: During an interview on 4/17/23, at 9:48 AM, with Resident 82 and her family member (FM) 2, FM 2 stated, Resident 82 had been blind four years due to diabetes (disease marked by high blood sugar levels which can lead to cardiac, vascular, kidney, and visual, and other health problems). FM 2 stated, Resident 82 was weak on her right side due to a stroke. FM 2 stated, the certified nursing assistants (CNA)s deliver her food trays, set the tray up, but do not orient Resident 82 to the items on the tray. During an observation on 4/17/23, at 12:02 PM, in Resident 82's room, Resident 82 was seated in a high-back wheelchair with her overbed table positioned over her lap. CNA 4 placed a mug of coffee on the overbed table but did not orient Resident 82 to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a fully continent (aware and able to control bowel and bladder function) resident was assisted with toileting needs to maintain continence for one of one sampled resident (Resident 118). This failure had the potential for Resident 118 to lose bowel and bladder continence and to negatively impact her dignity. Findings: During an interview on 4/17/23, at 2:54 PM, with Resident 118, Resident 118 stated, she was fully continent of bowel and bladder when she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 118 stated, when she was at home, she walked to the bathroom to empty her bowel and bladder. Resident 118 stated, she was placed in briefs (adult diapers) when she was admitted to the facility. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 4/20/23, at 10:20 AM, with Medical Records Assistant (MRA), Resident 118's clinical record was reviewed. Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment tool) Section H Bladder and Bowel, dated 2/27/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Dietitian's (RD) nutrition intervention recommendation was communicated to the physician in a timely manner for one of four sampled residents (Resident 50). This failure resulted in Resident 50's unplanned weight loss. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/17/23, at 12:05 PM, with Resident 50, in Resident 50's room, an opened carton of health shake and nutritional juice supplement (to increase calories and protein) were observed. Resident 50 stated, he had lost weight previously. During a review of Resident 50's Weights and Vitals Summary (WVS), dated 2/2/23 to 4/2/23, the WVS indicated: 2/03/23 - 145 lbs (pounds [#]; a measurement of weight) 2/11/23 - 126 lbs 2/18/23 - 122 lbs 2/25/23 - 117 lbs 3/4/23 - 120 lbs 3/11/23 - 118 lbs 3/18/23 - 121 lbs 4/1/23 - 122 lbs During a review of Resident 50's Nutritional Risk Assessment (Admission/Annual) (NRA), dated 2/16/23, the NRA indicated, Resident 50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for oxygen therapy was followed for one of six sampled resident (Resident 33). This failure had the potential for Resident 33 to have complications related to inadequate oxygen administration. Findings: During a review of Resident 33's admission Record (AR), dated 4/19/23, the AR indicated, Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD a type of progressive lung disease characterized by long-term respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation including shortness of breath) and Acute Respiratory failure with hypoxia (when your lungs cannot release enough oxygen into your blood). During an concurrent observation and interview on 4/17/23, at 11:13 AM, with Resident 33, in Resident 33's room, Resident 33 was observed laying in her bed without her oxygen on. Resident 33 stated, she only uses her oxygen at night. During a review of Resident 33's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to clarify with RD/Physician a duplicate order for a protein supplement for one of one sampled resident (Resident 103). This failure resulted in Resident 103 receiving more than the intended amount of the protein supplement and had the potential to result in undesired weight gain. Findings: During a review of Resident 103's Order Summary Report (OSR), the OSR indicated, there were two active orders for Prostat (protein supplement, wound healing). There was an order on 3/25/23, to give 30 ml (milliliters-metric unit of volume) two times a day and another order on 4/14/23, to give 30 ml three times a day. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 4/18/23, at 2:48 PM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 7, Resident 103's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 4/2023, was reviewed. The MAR indicated, Prostat was signed as given 5 times a day on 4/15/23, 4/16/23, and 4/17/23 between both orders. LVN 7 confirmed the findings and stated, MAR shows I signed for it, I must not have been paying attention. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the ordered diet menu to meet the nutritional needs for three of 133 sampled residents (Resident 24, Resident 58, and Resident 93). This failure resulted in unmet nutritional needs for at-risk vulnerable residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/18/23, at 11:50 AM, with Registered Dietician (RD), in the kitchen during tray line, Resident 24's lunch meal tray was prepared with a bread roll and placed in the delivery food cart by Dietary Aide (DA) 2. The RD reviewed the tray ticket with the lunch therapeutic spreadsheet for Consistent Carbohydrates (CCHO; a diet that provides a consistent amount of blood sugar balance intended for persons with diabetes [a disease of blood sugar imbalance]) and stated, Resident 24's diet should not include a bread roll food item for lunch tray. During a review of Resident 24's Physician's Order (PO), dated 3/10/23, the PO indicated, CCHO Diet. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/18/23, at 12:05 PM, with RD, in the kitchen during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician regarding refusal of treatment for one of 44 sampled residents (Resident 339). This failure had the potential to result in unmet care needs. Findings: During an observation and interview with a family member (FM) 2, on 10/22/19, at 3:40 PM, in Resident 339's room, there was a Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure machine (BiPAP machine - a non-invasive form of therapy for patients suffering from sleep apnea [temporary cessation of breathing during sleep]) on Resident 339's nightstand. FM 2 stated She [Resident 339] got a BiPAP but nobody knows how to use it. During an interview with the MDS (an assessment tool) Coordinator (MDSC) and review of clinical record for Resident 339, on 10/23/19, at 11:31 AM, she reviewed the Treatments Administration History dated 10/11/19 - 10/23/19 and noted the following: BiPAP with medium full face mask on @ [at] HS [bedtime] 10:30 PM and off in AM [morning] was ordered on 10/11/19. Resident 339 refused the BiPAP treatment and/or did not receive treatment on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medication via gastrostomy tube (G-tube - a tube inserted through the abdomen directly into the stomach, used to provide nutrition, fluids, and medication to people unable to take these things orally) as per the physician's order (PO) for one of 44 sampled residents (Resident 112). This failure had the potential to result in inadequate medication absorption for Resident 112. Findings: During a medication pass observation and interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, on 10/22/19, at 11:53 AM, LVN 1 poured 50 milliliters (mL - a unit of measurement) of water into a cup. She flushed Resident 112's G-tube with approximately 13 mL of water from the cup. She then mixed approximately 7 mL of water from the cup with crushed clonidine hcl (medication to treat high blood pressure) 0.2 milligrams (mg - a unit of measurement) tablet and administered it via G-tube. She then mixed approximately 7 mL of water from the cup with a crushed Vitamin C 500 mg tablet and administered it via G-tube. LVN 1 then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 44 sampled residents (Resident 129) received routine bathing. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 129's health and dignity. Findings: During an observation on 10/23/19, at 3:09 PM, in Resident 129's room, he was lying in his bed and appeared to be unshaven. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 10/23/19, at 3:36 PM, she reviewed the clinical record for Resident 129. She stated Resident 129 was on a shower schedule of Wednesdays and Saturdays on the evening shift. She stated Resident 129 refused showers. The Point of Care dated 10/1/19 - 10/23/19 indicated Resident 129 was only given one shower during October 2019, on 10/23/19, at 2:24 PM. The document indicated Resident 129 was Total Dependence [relies on staff to meet his bathing needs]. The only dates of documented shower refusal were 10/5/19 and 10/12/19. The DON confirmed the finding. During a review of the facility policy and procedure titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food preferences were honored for one of 44 sampled residents (Resident 130). This failure had the potential to result in decreased nutritional intake for Resident 130. Findings: During an observation, interview with the Registered Dietitian (RD), and review of Resident 130's meal tray ticket, on 10/21/19, at 12:16 PM, in the dining room, Resident 130 had a sandwich on a plate in front of her. She had eaten approximately two bites of her sandwich. The meal tray ticket in front of her indicated Dislikes: pork. The RD stated the sandwich on Resident 130's plate was a ham sandwich. The RD confirmed Resident 130's tray ticket indicated a dislike of pork, and stated a ham sandwich should not have been served to her. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Food Preferences dated 2018, it indicated Resident's food preferences will be adhered to within reason.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-24 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure usable assistive devices were available to one of 44 sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 3's nutritional status. Findings: During an interview with Resident 3, on 10/22/19, at 9:06 AM, he stated he needs modified utensils to eat his food. During an observation and interview with Resident 3, and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, on 10/22/19, at 12:20 PM, in his room, he was eating his lunch. The adaptive utensils on his meal tray had a foam material around the handles of the fork and spoon. The fork, from the neck through the tines, were bent at an almost 90-degree angle to the right. Resident 3 indicated the fork was unusable to feed himself. CNA 1 verified the fork was not usable for Resident 3's needs. During an interview with Occupational Therapy Assistant (OTA) 1 and OTA 2, on 10/23/19, at 10:07 AM, they confirmed the bent assistive device would not meet Resident 3's feeding needs. During a review of the facility policy and procedure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection prevention and control practices when: 1. Hand hygiene was not performed prior to assisting one of 44 sampled residents (Resident 46) with eating; 2. Resident care equipment was not maintained in a sanitary manner for one of 44 sampled residents (Resident 37). These failures had the potential to result in the spread of infection. Findings: 1. During an observation on 10/21/19, at 12:10 PM, in the dining room, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 grasped a chair with both hands and pulled it up to the table for residents who require assistance with eating. She did not perform hand hygiene after touching the chair. She then picked up Resident 46's spoon and his sandwich and helped feed him. During an interview with CNA 2, on 10/21/19, at 12:46 PM, she stated she did not perform hand hygiene before assisting Resident 46 with eating after touching the chair. During an interview with the Registered Dietician (RD), on 10/21/19, at 12:50 PM, she stated it is the facility's expectation hand hygiene is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$10,317 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $10,317 — penalty dated 2025-05-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GROSSMAN, STEPHENIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2010
WALKER, JONATHANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/14/2023
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$984K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 11%Medicare 26%Other / private 63%

This home reported $984K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$367per resident / day
operating cost
$11,142per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$391per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555208. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next