No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rossmoor Post Acute

1226 Rossmoor Parkway, Walnut Creek, CA 94595 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 155 certified beds · (925) 975-5000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (925) 975-5000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Apr 2024
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2227 Olympic Blvd · (925) 932-3663 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1960 Tice Valley Blvd · (925) 947-6050 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.1 mi
1972 Tice Valley Blvd · (925) 939-7213 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Rossmoor Pkwy · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2100 Tice Valley Blvd · (925) 935-2100

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.4%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.6%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.0%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.8%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.4%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.3%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.9%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.6%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.8%11.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.552.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.101.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 336 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
78.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.58U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.38hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 78.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 238 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.2%CMS range 60.8–71.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 7.9–11.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge78.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.7%CMS range 3.9–8.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.801.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
1.14
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.43
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.12
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
37.1%
Total nursing turnover
41.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 155 beds and averages 148.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.12 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-13)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2022-12-02)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-08 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to ensure one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) received adequate discharge planning and communication regarding a facility-initiated discharge. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing fear, distress, and uncertainty regarding discharge plans. During a review of facility's document titled, admission Record, printed 6/8/26, Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including polyneuropathy (a nerve disease that can cause pain, discomfort, and mobility difficulties) and chronic pain.During a review of facility's document titled, Brief Interview for Mental Status, (BIMS, an assessment for mental status), dated 3/4/26 for Resident 1, the BIMS indicated Resident 1 had a score of 15 out of 15, indicating no impaired cognition (intact mental status).During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/5/26 at 2:16 p.m. with Resident 1, facility's document titled, Notice of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-11 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate kitchen oversight when:1. The facility did not have any Dietary Manager or equivalent, and the Registered Dietitian did not provide full time oversight of the kitchen for two weeks; and2. The facility did not have a qualified Dietary Manager, and the Registered Dietitian did not provide full time oversight of the kitchen for one week.This failure to provide adequate oversight of the kitchen resulted in staff not adhering to safe hand hygiene practices (see F tag 880) and placed all residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk of food borne illness.1. During an interview on 8/27/25, at 1:50 p.m. with Human Resources (HR), HR stated the previous Certified Dietary Manager (CDM)'s last day at the facility was 8/21/25. HR stated CDM was working at another healthcare facility, and another dietary manager would start on 9/4/25.During an interview on 8/27/25, at 3:05 p.m. with Registered Dietitian 1 (RD 1), RD 1 stated the dietary manager was responsible for supervising day to day kitchen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it kept accurate records of controlled medications (medication with a potential for abuse) as evidenced by: 1. The facility failed to ensure, for Residents 1-7, the scheduled (controlled medication, narcotic) medication system was complete (all documents available) and accurate (information matched). The record system included Shipping Manifests (pharmacy delivery receipt), Controlled Substance Accountability Sheets (CDR, Controlled Drug Record), Medication Administration Records (MAR, record of medication administration) and destruction logs. The facility records were incomplete. The facility records were inaccurate. These failures had the potential to result in undetected loss and diversion of scheduled medications. In addition, these failures had the potential to result in preventable medication errors (medication not given as ordered).2. The facility failed to ensure, between 2/1/24-5/31/24, the Consultant Pharmacist identified the scheduled (controlled medication, narcotic) medication system was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control practice when:1. [NAME] 1 did not adhere to hand hygiene practice while checking temperatures of ready to eat foods,2. non-kitchen staff entered the kitchen without performing hand hygiene to get fruit, and3. [NAME] 1 contaminated the dinner tray line with raw fish.This failure placed residents in the Medbridge unit at risk of foodborne illness which had the potential for death.1. During an observation on 8/27/25 at 4:21 p.m., [NAME] 1 was at the tray line wearing gloves while using the temperature probe to measure food temperatures. After taking the temperature of pureed potato, [NAME] 1 adjusted their glasses with their gloved hand, then removed an alcohol wipe from their pants pocket with the same gloved hand. Without performing hand hygiene or changing gloves, [NAME] 1 continued to take the temperatures of chicken patties and then fish patties.2. During an observation on 8/27/25 at 3:37 p.m., in the kitchen, a maintenance staff (MS) entered the kitchen and, without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to inform a Resident's responsible party regarding change of condition and transfer from facility to acute care hospital for one of three sampled Residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 being transferred to an acute care hospital alone, without notice to their responsible party. During a record review of admission record, printed on 4/7/26, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE]. Under 'Contacts', the Resident's daughter was listed as emergency contact #1, responsible party.During a record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment used to guide care) dated 12/23/25, indicated Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool used to assess mental status) score was 2 out of 15, and indicated Resident 1's cognition was severely impaired. During a review of Resident 1's Baseline Care Plan-Centered Care Planning, dated 12/18/2025, the baseline care plan indicated Resident 1 was confused.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) was accurately completed for 1 (Resident #105) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for PASARR requirements. Findings included: A facility policy titled, admission Criteria, revised March 2023, indicated, 9. All new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission and Resident Review (PASARR) process. a. The acute hospital performs a Level I PASARR screen for all potential admissions, regardless of payor source, to determine if the individual meets the criteria for a MD, ID or RD. b. If the level I screen indicates that the individual may meet the criteria for a MD, ID, or RD, he or she is referred to the state PASARR representative for the Level II (evaluation and determination) screening process. (1) The admitting nurse notifies the social services department when a resident is identified as having a possible (or evident) MD, ID or RD.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained to prevent the development and/or transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #313) of 8 residents reviewed for infection control. Specifically, the facility failed to dispose of an intravenous (IV) catheter used to administer IV fluids to Resident #313. Findings included: During an interview on 02/13/2025 at 8:21 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated IV catheter should be discarded immediately in a sharps container (a puncture resistant container with leak-resistant sides and bottom and a tight-fitting lid with an opening not large enough for a hand to enter). An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #313 on 02/04/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of encephalopathy and altered mental status. Resident #313's Care Plan revealed a focus area initiated on 02/09/2025 that indicated the resident was at risk for dehydration. Interventions directed to staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication bubble pack labeled with resident information was kept secured and confidential when it was found on top of a treatment cart, in a hallway, for public view and access. This failure resulted in a resident's confidential medical information compromised and could potentially impact 154 residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/8/25, at 10:50 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated recycle bins and boxes on top of them were moved from the hallway to the Office Manager's room. On inspection, inside the room were two gray bins. One bin had a brown box on top of it. The box was overflowing with paper documents, empty medication bubble packs labeled with resident information, and a cannula tubing dated 1/5/25. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/8/25, at 11:00 a.m., with LVN 1, two treatment carts were in the hallway outside the Soiled Utility room. On top of one treatment cart were two white plastic bags with empty medication bubble…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2025-01-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate safety measures and adequate supervision to prevent one of three residents (Resident 1) from rolling out of bed and falling on the floor during after-shower care. The failure to provide sufficient staff or adequate measures to prevent a dependent resident from rolling off the bed during Activities of Daily Living (ADL, the basic self-care tasks an individual does on a day-to-day basis) care/after-shower care, resulted in Resident 1 being transported to the emergency department for evaluation after the fall, caused a seven centimeter (cm) laceration to the right forehead, a brief loss of consciousness, and a contusion (a bruise or skin discoloration due to injury to soft tissue) of right ankle. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record, printed 12/19/24, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses of morbid obesity (having too much body fat), cerebrovascular accident (CVA, a stroke or loss of blood flow to the brain), and Schizophrenia (a serious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) on the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct care). This failure resulted in an inaccurate reflection of Resident 1's current health condition which had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive the person-centered care that Resident 1 deserved. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record, printed 11/12/24, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (when the lungs are unable to provide oxygen in the body's tissues) and obesity (excessive weight). A review of Resident 1's Care Plan, revised date 4/15/22, indicated Resident 1 was at risk for respiratory impairment related to sleep apnea. A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, active orders as of 11/12/24, indicated: 1. 8/6/2023 - BIPAP Ventilator Respironics V60 (a breathing machine that helps people breathe when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident received the necessary respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice when facility failed to provide in a timely manner, the missing connector for the appropriate-sized BIPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure, a machine used to treat sleep apnea [a sleep-related breathing disorder]) mask used by one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1's inconvenience, discomfort, several nights of interrupted sleep, skin breakdown to nose bridge (related to use of unfit, temporary BIPAP mask), anxiety, and mood swings. This failure also had the potential to result in serious harm and potential death to the resident. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record, printed 11/12/24, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (when the lungs are unable to provide oxygen in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have oxygen safety signage posted on Resident 1 ' s room as Resident 1 used an oxygen concentrator (a portable medical device used to deliver oxygen to those who have a condition that causes or results in low levels of oxygen in their blood). This failure had the potential of not having safety precautions in place necessary to care for Resident 1 who required oxygen use. Findings: During a record review of Resident 1 ' s face sheet, undated, Resident 1 had a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a medical condition that occurs when the lungs have difficulty exchanging oxygen and carbon dioxide with the blood). During an interview on 7/31/24, at 8:55 a.m., with Nurse Supervisor (NS), NS stated a resident who uses oxygen should have a magnetic oxygen signage posted on the door. During an observation on 7/31/24, at 12:10 p.m., Resident 1 had an oxygen concentrator located at the bedside. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/31/24, at 12:26 p.m., NS stated Resident 1 did not have an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to ensure a suspicion of sexual abuse, including injuries of unknown origin, was reported to appropriate authorities within the required regulatory timeframe when the Ombudsman received a telephone call from the facility ' s Master of Social Work (MSW) on 2/20/24, at 3 pm., regarding a concern that had been brought up by Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) during Resident 1 ' s Care Conference. This failure resulted in the facility's ability to ensure a complete investigation was initiated timely and ensure interventions were initiated to protect Resident 1 as well as all other residents of the facility, from protection from abuse. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record, printed date 3/14/24, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses of Alzheimer ' s Disease (a decline in memory, thinking, learning, and organizing skills over time) and failure-to-thrive (state of decline in health and ability). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) had adequate services to improve or maintain mobility when Resident 1 was discharged from physical therapy services after seven days out of a 60 day physical therapy plan and did not have recommendations at physical therapy service discharge to the physician or nursing staff to maintain or improve mobility. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk of impaired mobility and falls. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation therapy after a right hip hemiarthroplasty (surgical replacement of the hip with an artificial hip). Resident 1 had a diagnosis of right femur fracture, artificial right hip joint and muscle wasting. During a record review of Resident 1's Hospitalist Discharge Summary, dated 1/4/24, Resident 1's hospitalization prior to admission to the facility was reviewed. The summary indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing nursing assessments for one of three residents (Resident 1) involving: 1. admission Evaluation did not include skin condition of buttock area that had Mepilex (absorbent foam dressing) for protection. 2. When pressure injury was evaluated, Pressure Ulcer Report was not completed until four days after admission and Skin and Wound Evaluation Report was completed after an additional three days. 3. Care plans for rashes and pain were not personalized for Resident 1. 4. Treatment Administration Record (TAR) did not have entries for nine tasks related to skin monitoring and wound care. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving ongoing assessments and the delay in having updated status of pressure injury (a localized damage to the skin and underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) may potentially affect Resident 1's care and well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet, undated, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all staff wore the proper personal protective equipment (PPE, protective clothing, gloves, face masks, goggles and other garments used to protect the wearer's body from injury or infection) required during the facility's COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019, a sickness caused by a virus called severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) outbreak when the Receptionist wore a surgical mask (a loose-fitting disposable device that creates a physical barrier between mouth and nose of wearer) instead of the required N95 mask (Non-0il with 95% efficiency, a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles). This deficiency had the potential to place residents, visitors, and other staff at risk for serious respiratory illnesses. Findings: During an observation on 11/8/23, at 1:30 p.m., upon entrance to the building, a sign was posted at the entrance door that indicated there was currently a respiratory outbreak which required staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-06 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish criteria for registered nursing staff to follow for assessment and determination of irreversible death for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) using her personal judgement to assess Resident 1 as dead, instead of immediately calling 9-1-1 for emergency medical services or starting cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, any medical intervention used to restore blood circulation or breathing functions that have ceased) as per Resident 1's physician order to provide full emergency medical treatment in the event Resident 1 stopped breathing, or Resident 1's heart stopped beating. This failure had the potential to result in residents being denied life-saving measures in the event death was reversible. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record Report, undated, the admission Record Report indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled residents (Resident 47, 1 and 21) were provided privacy when staff did not draw the curtain during wound care for Residents 47 and 1, and Resident 21's Foley catheter bag (a urine drainage bag that collects urine. The bag is attached to a catheter (tube) is inside the bladder) was not covered and was visible. This failed practice had the potential to jeopardize Residents 47, 1 and 21's dignity. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record Report and order details indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnose of uterus (the womb) cancer and Resident 1 was treated for pressure injury (breakdown of skin integrity due to pressure) on her sacrococcygeal (tailbone). A review of Resident 47's admission Record Report and order details indicated, Resident 47 was admitted to the facility with diagnose of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration) and was treated for pressure injury on sacral (tailbone). During an observation on 11/30/22 at 10:00 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of nine sampled residents (Residents 488, 39, 633, and 8 received showers, bed baths and nailcare when Residents 488, 633, and 39 did not receive timely showers and Residents 8 and 39 did not receive nail care. This failure placed residents at risk for getting infections from lack of proper hygiene, injuring themselves with long fingernails, and compromising residents' physical and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: During a review of Resident 488's admission Record printed on 12/01/22, the admission Record indicated Resident 488 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had medical diagnoses including traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain). During a record review of Resident 488's, Social Services Evaluation- V2, dated 11/22/22, indicated, Resident 488 was alert and oriented to time, place and person and had a BIMS score of 12 out of 15 and indicated moderate mental impairment. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During a review of Resident 633's admission Record Report printed on 11/28/22, the record indicated Resident 633 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a record review of Resident 633's Minimum Data Set, dated 11/16/22, the assessment indicated Resident 633 had a BIMS score of 14 out of 15 and indicated intact mental status. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/28/22, at 10:43 a.m., Resident 633 was sitting at the edge of the bed and stated, Both my legs are swollen, and they burn and [NAME], for two weeks; no one has come in to help me. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/28/22, at 12:13 p.m., Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC, a Registered Nurse responsible for conducting the resident assessments) assessed Resident 633's legs and stated Resident 633 had 2+ pitting edema. During an interview and record review on 11/28/22, at 12:20 p.m., with the MDSC, Resident 633's admission assessment and nursing progress notes from 11/12/22 through 11/28/22 were reviewed. The MDSC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Medications were administered according to physician's orders for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 639); 2. Controlled medications awaiting final destruction were securely stored; 3. Random controlled medication use audits for four of five residents (Residents 3, 11, 57, and 442) were not reconciled. The medications were signed out of the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but not documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to indicate they were given to the residents, or documented in the MAR and not signed out of the CDR; and 4. Physician was notified of missed doses of anti-seizure medication for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 102) placing the resident at risk for seizures. These failures had the potential for Residents 639 and 102 to not receive their therapeutic dose of medications and medication diversion. Findings: 1. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy storage and labeling procedures were followed when: 1. Medication refrigerator (#) temperature was not monitored and recorded twice daily; 2. Expired medications in the medication refrigerator were not discarded; 3. Expired medications in the medication carts were not discarded; 4. Resident 90's medication was not labeled; 5. Treatment material was left unattended at Resident 29's bedside. These failures had the potential for impaired medication integrity or to administer expired medication to residents. Findings: 1. During a review of the refrigerator temperature monitoring log on 11/28/22, at 9:29 a.m., the log dated November 2022, indicated temperature monitoring was not completed twice daily on nine days. The facility was unable to provide additional temperature monitoring logs upon request on 11/28/22 and 11/29/22, for August 2022 through September 2022. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 stated vaccines were to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure food service safety when multiple food items with no open date were found in the refrigerators. This failure placed the residents at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/28/22, at 9:15 a.m., with Director of Food Services (DFS), in the kitchen during the initial tour, it was observed in Refrigerator (Ref) 1, an opened package of butter, and a bag of cheese omelet with five pieces remaining with no date open indicated on the packaging. In Ref 2, there was an open bag of lettuce and an open bag of ham with no date open indicated on the packaging. DFS stated an open date should be placed on each packaging to know when it needed to be discarded. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Labeling Food and Date Marking, dated 11/2020, the P&P indicated, Foods are labeled following deliver, preparation or opening to identify the item and to provide date, time and, or temperature information. The P&P also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A review of Resident 76's admission Record Report and order summary report indicated Resident 76 was admitted to the facility with diagnose of Acute respiratory failure and was receiving 2 liter oxygen via nasal cannula every shift. During an observation on 11/28/22 at 10:44 a.m., Resident 76 was in bed and was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. The nasal cannula and sterile water chamber (humidifier) connected to the oxygen tank was not dated or labeled. Resident 76's treatment mask connected to the nebulizer was dated 9/19/22. During an interview on 11/28/22 at 10:48 a.m., with LVN 6, LVN 6 confirmed the oxygen tube and humidifier were not properly dated, LVN 6 stated did not know when nurses changed them and confirmed the date on treatment mask was 9/19/22. LVN 6 stated Resident 76 used the treatment mask for breathing treatment. LVN 6 further stated oxygen tubes, mask and humidifier should be change weekly due to infection control. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 86), had physician's orders for Oxygen (O2) for more than six-months, when O2 was being administered around the clock. This failure resulted in Resident 86 receiving O2 without a physician order. Findings: During a record review of Resident 86's admission Record Report printed on 12/2/22, the record indicated Resident 86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a record review of Resident 86's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment used to guide care) dated 10/24/22, the assessment indicated Resident 86 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment of mental status) score of 15 out of 15 and indicated intact mental status. During an observation on 11/28/22, at 11:05 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 9, LVN 9 stated Resident 86 was receiving O2 via nasal cannula (thin plastic tube inserted in nostrils to provide oxygen) at 2 Liters/minute (L/min). During an additional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, nursing services did not communicate a doctor's therapy order in a timely manner for Resident 112. This failure resulted in a delay of services needed to maintain Resident 112's physical well-being. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/28/22 at 11:00 a.m., Resident 112 laid in bed. Resident 112 stated she did not get physical therapy as her doctor ordered. Resident 112 stated therapy no longer worked with her and the facility was trying to discharge me home without my equipment, I need a bed, walker, and wheelchair. Resident 112 stated her legs were starting to stiffen and complained her legs and feet hurt because no one comes to help get her out of bed into her wheelchair or to walk or move around, I just lay here, and they do not check on her needs. Resident 112 stated she knows of the COVID-19 (a serious respiratory disease) restrictions and not leaving her room, but wanted to walk back and forth from her bed to the door. Review of Resident 112's physician order dated 11/21/22, indicated, 1. Continue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-04-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect and promote the rights of four (Residents 184, 98, 112 and 117) of seven sampled residents when the following occurred: 1. Resident 184 was not given a shower when requested. 2. Resident 98 could be seen from the hallway exposed in her brief. 3. Resident 112 was not provided privacy and exposed when her Gastronomy Tube (GT - a tube surgically inserted into the stomach to provide nutrition, medication and water) was assessed. 4. Resident 117 was not asked for permission before staff removed her linen/covers. These failures resulted in unnecessary exposure for Residents 184, 98, 112, and 117 and had the potential for them to feel humiliated, disrespected, and disregarded. Findings: 1. Review of the medical record showed Resident 184 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a fractured left femur (thighbone) and an injury to his right leg. Further review of Resident 184's last comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-04-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store food in the refrigerators. This deficient practice had a potential for residents to consume food with food-borne pathogens. Findings: During an observation on 4/22/19 at 2:10 p.m. while in the presence of the Registered Dietician (RD 2), refrigerator #2 had an opened paper container of Wholesome Farms Scrambled Egg Mix-Liquid Egg Product without an opened date or used by date labeled. During an interview on 4/22/19 at 2:13 p.m., RD 2 stated everything in the refrigerators should have an opened date marked on it. During an observation on 4/22/19 at 2:17 p.m., the walk-in refrigerator had three clear pitchers without the name, open date, or use by date labeled. Further observation showed the first pitcher had an amber colored liquid, the second pitcher had a dark brown liquid, and the third liquid had an orange liquid. During an interview on 4/22/19 at 2:18 p.m., RD 2 stated, I do not know what kind of juices they are. Maybe they are apple, watermelon, and orange juice. They should be labeled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist one (Resident 184) of three sampled residents to the bathroom which resulted in Resident 184 defecating on himself. This failure resulted in Resident 184 feeling embarrassed and ignored. Findings: Review of the medical record showed Resident 184 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a fractured left femur (thighbone) and an injury to his right leg. Further review of Resident 184's last comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool used to direct health care needs) dated 2/21/19 showed Resident 184 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score (BIMS - a screening tool used to assess cognition) of 15 (cognitively intact). The MDS further showed Resident 184 was continent of urine and bowel, however required one person to assist him when transferring from one surface/area to another. During an interview on 4/22/19 at 11:37 a.m., Resident 184 stated, Day shift took about one and a half hours to respond to my call light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was functioning for one (Resident 95)of three sampled residents. For Resident 95, his call light went non-functioning for three days before the facility addressed this need. This failure resulted in Resident 95 feeling frustrated he could not directly contact the staff for his care needs. Findings: A review of Resident 95's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool used to help direct health care needs) dated on 4/4/19 showed Resident 95's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a screening tool that aims to determine a person's attention, level of orientation, and ability to recall information) scored Resident 95 at 15, which meant Resident 95 was able to understand and be understood by others. Further review of the MDS showed Resident 95 required extensive assistance with one-person to physically assist Resident 95 when moving to or from his bed, a chair, his wheelchair, to a standing position, and for toilet use. During an observation and concurrent interview on 4/22/19 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2019-04-26 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one of 33 sampled residents (Resident 112) had an accurate admission assessment. Resident 112 is hard of hearing on her right ear. This failure had the potential for Resident 112 to not receive the proper care and treatment for her hearing impairment. Findings: Review of the face sheet on 4/24/19 showed Resident 112 was admitted to the facility in 2019. During an observation on 4/23/19 at 9:05 a.m., Resident 112's visitor and Registered Nurse (RN 3) were speaking closely into Resident 112's left ear. During an interview on 4/23/19 at 10:26 a.m., Resident 112 stated she could not hear in her right ear (pointed to her right ear). Resident 112 also stated she used to have a hearing aid before she came to the facility, but she did not have one at the moment. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool used to direct health care needs) dated 4/11/19; Section B0200 indicated 0 which meant that Resident 112 had adequate hearing. During an interview on 4/24/19 at 11:25 a.m., the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2019-04-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete medical record for one (Resident 332)of five sampled residents. For Resident 332, the Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a form documenting a person's wishes for end of life treatment) form was incomplete. This failure resulted end of life treatment documentation being unclear which had the potential for Resident 332's end of life wishes to not be carried out as she would like. Findings: Review of Resident 332's admission Record Report on 4/24/19 showed Resident 332 was admitted to the facility in 2018. According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool used to help direct health care needs) dated on 4/25/19 showed Resident 332's Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score was 15; which indicated that Resident 332 was able to understand and be understood by others. Review of Resident 332's medical record further showed the POLST form was not signed by Resident 332. During an interview on 4/23/19 at 12:33 p.m., Registered Nurse (RN 2) stated the charge nurse upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2019-04-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation of influenza vaccination status in the medical record of one of five sampled residents (Resident 98). Resident 98's medical record did not contain documentation of receipt or refusal of the influenza vaccine. This deficient practice had the potential for miscommunication to occur about Resident 98's influenza vaccination status. Findings: A review of Resident 98's medical record indicated she was admitted to the facility in 2019. There was no documentation of Resident 98 receiving or refusing the influenza vaccine. During an interview with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) on 4/24/19 at 9:05 a.m., the DSD stated that each admitted resident is screened for influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations. During an interview with the DSD on 4/24/19 at 10:39 a.m., the DSD stated the unit managers track the influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations, and the Acting Director of Nursing (ADON) verifies the information. The DSD stated the expectation was that the facility screens residents every year for influenza…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 52.9+2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
APT, FREDERICKIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2024
TRUIST BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 12/07/2023
PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
DJAFFER, MELISSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2024
SHAIKH, ZAHIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/14/2024
STOCK, STEVENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/16/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$26.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$611K
Related-party expense2% of expenses

This home reported $611K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$534per resident / day
operating cost
$16,235per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$540per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555446. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next