Tice Valley Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 135 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 127 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 116.5 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.25 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.44 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0836 — widespread
  Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow state Title 22 regulations and ensure the social services department was staffed and supervised by qualified and competent staff which affect all 123 residents.This failure resulted in all 123 residents receiving social services care from unqualified staff. During an interview on 9/23/25, at 10:35 a.m., with Social Services Director (SSD), SSD stated they were the director of the social services department and were responsible for admission assessments, discharge planning. SSD stated the social services department assisted residents with dental, optometry, podiatry and psychiatric appointments to ensure residents' physical, mental and psychosocial needs were met. SSD stated they had been working since 5/2025.During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/24/25, at 4:23 p.m., with Director of Staff Development (DSD), SSD's two job descriptions, dated 5/15/25 and 8/18/25, were reviewed. DSD stated after review of the job descriptions, SSD did not meet the qualifications of the 5/25/25 description and did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it kept accurate records of controlled medications (medication with a potential for abuse) as evidenced by: 1. The facility failed to ensure, for residents 1-8, the scheduled (controlled medication, narcotic) medication system was complete (all documents available) and accurate (information matched). The record system included Shipping Manifests (pharmacy delivery receipt), Controlled Substance Accountability Sheets (CDR, Controlled Drug Record), Medication Administration Records (MAR, record of medication administration) and destruction logs. The facility records were incomplete. The facility records were inaccurate. These failures had the potential to result in undetected loss and diversion of scheduled medications. In addition, these failures had the potential to result in preventable medication errors (medication not given as ordered).2. The facility failed to ensure, between 2/1/24-6/30/24, the Consultant Pharmacist identified the scheduled (controlled medication, narcotic) medication system was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNAs) did not provide Resident 1 showers as scheduled by the facility. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for poor hygiene, body odor, infection, and transmission of diseases. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), printed 3/25/26, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis (Kidney failure impossible to service without dialysis). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan), dated 2/18/26, the MDS indicated Resident 1's Basic Interview of Mental status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0836 — widespread
  Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow state Title 22 regulations and ensure the social services department was staffed and supervised by qualified and competent staff which affected all 120 residents.This failure resulted in all 120 residents receiving social services care from unqualified staff.During an interview on 9/23/25, at 10:35 a.m., with Social Services Director (SSD), SSD stated they were the director of the social services department and were responsible for admission assessments, discharge planning. SSD stated the social services department assisted residents with dental, optometry, podiatry and psychiatric appointments to ensure residents' physical, mental and psychosocial needs were met. SSD stated they had been working since 5/2025.During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/24/25, at 4:23 p.m., with Director of Staff Development (DSD), SSD's two job descriptions, dated 5/15/25 and 8/18/25, were reviewed. DSD stated after review of the job descriptions, SSD did not meet the qualifications of the 5/25/25 description and did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and medical record and document review, the facility failed to provide services for activities of daily living for 1 (Resident 50) of 8 sampled residents when: For Resident 50, fingernails were long and had black debris under the fingernails. These failures resulted in resident not having their hygiene maintained and had the potential to increase risk for infection. Findings:During an observation on 9/23/25, at 10:35 a.m., Resident 50 sat in bed and ate yogurt. Resident 50 stated she could feed herself. Resident 50 had black debris under her fingernails to both hands. Resident 50 stated the staff helped to clean her fingernails. Resident 50 stated she is forgetful.During an observation on 9/24/25, at 9:40 a.m., Resident 50 ate from her breakfast tray. Resident 50 had black debris under her fingernails to both hands.During an interview on 9/24/25, at 10:07a.m., CNA 2 stated he tries to clean Resident 50's nails.During a follow-up interview on 9/25/25, at 10:00 a.m., CNA 2 stated it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to follow the hemodialysis (treatment to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when kidneys are not functioning properly) care plan for one (Resident 50) of eight sampled residents reviewed. This failure did not ensure a hemodialysis resident received the service consistent with professional standards of practice and a person-centered care plan. Findings:During an observation and concurrent interview on 9/22/25, at 10:35 a.m., Resident 50 had bandages on her left upper arm. Resident 50 stated the bandages were put on at dialysis this past Saturday, two days ago. Resident 50 stated she did not know when they were to be removed.During an observation on 9/23/25, at 9:40 a.m., Resident 50 had the same bandages from yesterday on her left upper arm. Resident 50 stated she is going to dialysis after lunch today.During a review of Resident 50's facility Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated an admit date [DATE] with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate diet texture according to physician orders for two of three sampled residents (Resident 23 and 5) when both received a minced and moist meat texture instead of chopped.These failures resulted in Resident 5 and 23 experiencing a lower quality of life when they received a less advanced diet which was not to their documented preference.A review of Resident 23's admission record titled, admission Record, dated 9/25/25, indicated Resident 23 was admitted to the facility for senile degeneration of brain and hypertension (high blood pressure).During a record review of Resident 23's minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool to guide resident care), dated 6/24/25, the MDS indicated Resident 23 had Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12 (BIMS, is a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status in regard to attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of eight to twelve indicates a moderate cognitive impairment.) The MDS further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (Residents 9 and 69) out of eight sampled residents received appropriate catheter care per facility policy when there were inconsistent cleaning methods used by staff.This failure had the potential to result in increased risk of urinary tract infections for residents 9 and 69. Findings: During a review of the medical record titled, PACS Medication Administration Record, dated 8/26/25, the record indicated Resident 9 was admitted [DATE] with instructions to provide catheter care every shift. During a review of the medical record, dated 9/19/25, titled, Care Plan Report, the record indicated Resident 9 was at risk for complications with urinary system related to urinary tract infections (UTI- an infection of the urinary system often caused by bacteria).During a review of the medical record, dated 9/2/25, titled, SBAR Communication Form, the record indicated resident 9 had a history of benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate safety measures and adequate supervision to prevent one of three residents (Resident 1) from slipping out of bed and falling on the floor during incontinence care. The failure to provide adequate measures to prevent a dependent resident from slipping off the bed and falling onto the floor during incontinence care, resulted in Resident 1 being transported to the emergency department for further evaluation, requiring 15 stitches to maintain closure of the laceration (cut) on the right lower leg, and fracturing (partial or complete break in the bone) their right shoulder. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record, printed 12/12/24, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2016 with diagnoses of dementia (memory loss), diabetes (high blood sugar), essential tremor (a nervous system disorder that cause rhythmic shaking), and morbid obesity (having too much body fat). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool used to provide care), dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure supplies stored in the Lexington medication storage room were appropriate for use when: 1. Ten Female Luer Lock Caps (a device used to seal syringes [pumps used for drawing up and expelling liquids or suspensions into the body]) were expired. 2. Two Statlock Catheter Stabilization Devices (designed to stabilize peripherally-inserted central catheters or PICCs [a long, thin tube inserted through an arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart]) were expired. 3. One IV Catheter was expired. 4. One Kangaroo Feeding Bag Set (a spike, tubing, and bag for liquid nutrition delivery directly into the digestive tract) was expired. These failures had the potential for residents to receive expired, ineffective, and contaminated medications and treatments. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], at 10:50 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1), in the Lexington medication storage area: 1. Ten…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $468K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA