Yuba City Post Acute
1220 Plumas St, Yuba City, CA 95991 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (530) 671-0550 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.1% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.7% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.99 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.28 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 233 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 90.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.2%CMS range 56.6–68.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.8–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 90.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 86.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 67.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 4.1–9.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.20 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 54.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.76 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and use of safety devises during transport for one of three sample residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was transported to a medical appointment without the use of a lap seat belt.This failure had the potential to result in falls or injuries during transport and caused Resident 1 to feel afraid and unsafe.Findings:During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Abuse Prevention Program, undated, indicated residents have the right to be free from abuse and neglect. The policy further states that the facility will implement measures including staff training, prevention policies, and ongoing identification and assessment of potential abuse to ensure resident protection.During a review of Resident 1's medical record, indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include difficulty in walking, thrombocytopenia (a condition characterized by abnormally low platelet levels),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5% for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 40 and Resident 4) when: 1. Registered Nurse (RN) B did not administer Resident 4's oral inhalation medication as ordered by prescriber.2. RN G administered Resident 44's medication not in accordance with the standards of practice.As a result, 2 errors were identified out of 26 opportunities for error during the observation of medication administration; the facility medication error was 7.69%.Findings:1. During an observation on 9/16/25 at 9:24 am, RN B was observed to prepare and administer Resident 4's morning medications which did not include a multidose inhaler, fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol inhalation powder (combination of 3 medications used to treat shortness of breath), for oral inhalation use.During a reconciliation of the observation of medication administration with Resident 4's Physician Orders, indicated an order, dated 6/11/25, for fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol inhalation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly as specified by the manufacturers when the temperature of a medication refrigerator was out of range below the freezing point.This failure resulted in liquid medications to crystalize and become ineffective.Findings:During a review of facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Storage of Medications, reviewed October 2024, the P&P indicated, drugs and biologicals are stored in a safe, secure orderly manner including drugs being stored in locked compartments under proper temperature and light. The policy did not include the proper temperature range for the pharmaceutical items stored in the refrigerator.During a concurrent observation and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/16/25 at 12:24 pm, the temperature of the medication refrigerator in the medication room was 29 F (degree Fahrenheit: unit of measurement). There were multiple medications in the refrigerator including insulin (medication used to treat high sugar level) vials. There was visible ice to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director (MD) and the resident was notified of a change in condition for one of three sampled residents (Resident 35) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LN) J discovered exposed bone and a surgical screw in Resident 35's right lateral ankle wound . This failure had the potential to put Resident 35 at risk of infection and a decrease in quality of care.Findings:During a record review of facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status dated October 2024, indicated The nurse will notify the attending physician when there has been a.significant change in the resident's condition.specific instruction to notify the physician of changes in the resident's condition. Facility policy further indicated A 'significant change' of condition is a major decline or improvement in the resident's status that: Will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans (a detailed, patient-centered document that summarizes a patient's medical, functional, and psychosocial needs and goals, outlining the interventions and resources needed to achieve them) for two of 18 residents (Resident 33 and 9) who's care plans were reviewed, when: 1. Resident 33 had a deep tissue injury (DTI, localized damage to the skin and tissue caused by pressure on an area for a long time) and there was no care plan developed.2. Resident 9 was noted to be missing teeth on admission and there was no oral/dental care plan developed. These failures had the potential to decrease the physical, psychosocial, and emotional well being of Residents 33 and 9.Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive, reviewed August 2024, indicated the policy statement is A comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan (a detailed, patient-centered document that summarizes a patient's medical, functional, and psychosocial needs and goals, outlining the interventions and resources needed to achieve them) for one of seven residents (Resident 33) when Resident 33 had a medical equipment change from a cast to a Controlled Ankle Motion boot (CAM boot - a device designed to immobilize and support the ankle joint after an injury or surgery) on the right foot.This failure had the potential to decrease the physical, psychosocial, and emotional wellbeing of Resident 33.Findings:A review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive, reviewed August 2024, indicated, Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change.A review of Resident 33's clinical record indicated Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of two residents sampled (Resident 58) received services that met professional standards when Resident 58 did not have episodes of diarrhea documented in their medical record to provide a full description of a change of condition for Resident 58. This failure had the potential for Resident 58 to not receive proper care for her diarrhea which could cause decline in physical, mental and psychosocial health. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised October 2024, indicated 5. The nurse will record in the resident's medical record information relative to changes in the resident's medical/mental condition or status. A review of Resident 58's admission record indicated Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture of the right upper leg, muscle weakness, diabetes (high sugar in the blood), depression, anxiety and heart failure. Resident 58 made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided for two of three residents sampled for skin damage (Resident 49 and 58) when: 1. Resident 58 had developed redness to her bottom and it went unreported by staff and without appropriate treatments for healing. 2. Resident 49 developed a red rash around her mouth and it went unreported by staff and without appropriate treatments for healing. These failures had the potential for Resident 58 and 49's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs to go unmet. Findings:A review of the facility's policy titled Prevention of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries (pressure sores) reviewed October 2024, indicated Inspect the skin when performing or assisting with personal care or ADL's (activity of daily livings). Evaluate, report and document potential changes in the skin.A review of the facility's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Job description, dated 2/2019, indicated essential duties included to report all changes in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure annual performance evaluations for three out of four Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA C, E, and F) were completed every 12 months. This had the potential for direct care staff not to provide quality of care and meet the needs of the residents. Findings:During a record review of facility policy titled Performance Evaluations dated September 2024, indicated A performance evaluation may be completed on each employee at least annually based on the hire date. Facility policy further indicated The supervisor and the evaluated employee should sign and date the evaluation form.During a concurrent interview and employee file review on 9/17/25 at 11:19 am, Payroll Personnel (PP) confirmed there were no annuals performance reviews completed for:1. CNA C, Date of Hire (DOH) 11/22/23, missing a 2024 annual evaluation.2. CNA E, DOH 3/29/22, missing a 2023 annual evaluation.3. CNA F, DOH 4/1/23, missing a 2024 annual evaluation.During a concurrent interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/18/25 at 12:12 pm, CNA employee files…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain its infection prevention control program when: 1. One of one resident (Resident 58) sampled for Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) was suspected to have Clostridium Difficile (c-diff, a bacterium [germ], transmissible infection [easily spreads to another person], that causes an infection of the colon, the longest part of the large intestine. Symptoms can range from diarrhea to life-threatening damage to the colon) and no isolation precautions were initiated as per policy to prevent the spread of disease. This failure had the potential to spread c-diff to other residents and staff and cause severe illness and decline in health status. 2. One of two residents (Resident 10's) sampled for tube feedings, had a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a feeding tube that delivers nutrition, fluids, and medications directly into the stomach thru a surgical created opening in the abdomen) Lopez valve (a three way stop cock that fits to the end of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview and Record Review the facility failed to report a crime or abuse incident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) when Resident 2 ' s Family Member (FM) exposed himself to Resident 1 while in Resident 1 and Resident 2 ' s shared room. This failure to report to proper authorities placed all residents at risk for allegations of abuse to go unreported. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, revised December 2018, the Abuse Investigation and Reporting policy indicated, All reports of resident abuse .(and) mistreatment .shall be promptly reported to local state and federal agencies . A review of Resident 1 ' s medical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Right Femur Fracture, R Femur Surgical Intervention, and History of Falls. The Minimum Data Set (MDS, Tool for evaluating and implementing a standardized assessment) Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, Section C assessing cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision based on individual resident needs, for three out of three sampled residents (Residents 34, 50, and 28) when: 1. Facility staff was aware Resident 34 wandered (roamed from place to place) in and out of other resident rooms. 2. Facility staff was aware Resident 50 wandered in and out of other resident rooms. 3. Facility staff was aware that Resident 28 demonstrated daily episodes of increased agitation and volatility exhibited by yelling, cursing, and throwing items. This failure had the potential to impact resident safety, privacy, dignity, and placed residents at an increased risk for resident-to-resident altercations. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Wandering and Elopement, revised 10/1/23, indicated, the facility staff would identify residents who were at risk for unsafe wandering and develop a plan to keep the residents safe. A review of the Resident [NAME] of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assure that there was sufficient, qualified nursing staff available at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for 11 of 30 residents (Resident 215, 28, 57, 45, 5, and 365), and Confidential Interview Residents), when call lights were observed and reported to go unanswered for extended periods of time resulting in: 1. Residents being left in soiled briefs with bowel movement and/ or urine. 2. Residents being left on the toilet for extended periods of time. 3. Residents left waiting for assistance in bed for a variety of reasons, including for generalized needs, or attempting to receive assistance to go to the to toilet. 4. Residents experiencing health concerns such as pain and shortness of breath (SOB). This failure had the potential to result in skin breakdown, increased overall pain, increase of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) were performed for medication irregularities, appropriate indication (reason for use), and/or unnecessary psychotropic (affecting mental state) medications for two of four sampled residents (Residents 50 and 25) when: 1A. The indication for Seroquel (medication affecting mental processing and behaviors) use of mood disorder as evidenced by (AEB) striking during care was determined appropriate for Resident 50 on two MRRs by Consultant Pharmacist (CPH), though medication necessity and effectiveness had not been evaluated (50 days after admission) by the Psychotropic Interdisciplinary Team (IDT - group of professional healthcare providers including physician(s), nurses, pharmacists who meet to determine appropriateness of resident medication treatment plans). 1B. No medication irregularities were reported by CPH for Resident 50 despite Seroquel being administered in combination with donepezil…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5 percent for two of six sampled residents (Residents 25 and 216) when: 1. For Resident 25, Licensed Nurse D (LN D) administered one oxybutynin extended-release (ER) 5 milligrams (mg - a unit of measure) tablet rather than the ordered oxybutynin chloride 5 mg, an immediate-release (IR) tablet, to treat overactive bladder. 2. For Resident 216, LN D did not administer scheduled or as-needed pain medications when Resident 216 stated his pain was 10 on a scale of 1 to 10 (1 being the lowest pain, 10 being the highest). These failures resulted in two medication errors identified out of 29 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 6.9 percent, with the potential for adverse health consequences from medication toxicity effect and unaddressed pain. FINDINGS: 1. During a review of Resident 25's medical records, the record indicated Resident 25 was admitted in 10/2023 with diagnoses of unspecified symptoms of the genitourinary system (organs of the urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and medication supplies were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles when: 1. A discontinued medication was not removed and discarded from an active medication drawer in Medication Cart A (MC A), 2. Six multi-dose tubes of noncontrolled medicated creams (prescription medications with less risk of addiction and abuse) were in a facility supply basket in Treatment Cart 1 (TC 1) without patient-specific labeling, 3. A used oral medication syringe was affixed with a rubber band to a bottle of liquid Keppra (anti-seizure medication) for reuse and was stored in a drawer of TC 1, 4. A bottle of glucose test strips was open and undated in MC A, 5. Eight loose pills were found in drawers and on the bottom of MC A, 6. A bottle of ketoconazole shampoo (antifungal) in TC 1 was being used on a resident despite an expiration date of 7/2023, and 7. An intravenous (IV) line filter (filters potential impurities to prevent infection) that expired 9/1/23 was in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the food and nutrition services department failed to provide food that was palatable (good temperature, tasted good) when residents from a confidential interview and 11 out of 22 sampled residents (Residents 5, 16, 28, 30, 37, 38, 43, 45, 57, 59, and 215) stated the food did not taste good and was cold. This failure had the potential for unintended weight loss. Findings: A review of the facility's undated policy and procedure titled, Meal Service, indicated, Temperature of the food when the resident receives it is based on palatability. The goal is to serve cold food cold and hot food hot. A review of the undated admission Record, indicated, Resident 57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes (body could not regulate the amount of sugar in the blood). Resident 57 was her own responsible party (RP, made own decisions). A review of Resident 57's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment), dated 7/20/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to local, state, and federal agencies, including the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) E stated, CNA E observed Resident 48 shaking a fist and making verbal threats to harm Resident 50. This failure placed all residents at risk for allegations of abuse to go unreported. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, revised 7/1/17, indicated, reports of alleged abuse would be reported to local, state, and federal agencies. A review of the facility's P&P titled, Abuse Prevention Program, revised 2/1/24, indicated, residents had the right to be free from abuse. A review of the State Operation Manual, revised 8/8/24, defined abuse as a willful infliction that included verbal abuse or intimidation, which could affect a person's psychosocial well-being. A review of the undated admission Record, indicated, Resident 48…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans (a document that described health conditions, the level of care the resident required, and how that care would be provided) for two out of two sampled residents (Residents 34 and 50) when: 1. Resident 34's care plan was not revised to include wandering behaviors (roaming from place to place). 2. Resident 50's care plan was not revised to include a change in wandering behaviors. This failure had the potential to cause a decline in physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and placed Residents 34 and 50 at risk for harm. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive, indicated, the care plan would Describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The P&P indicated, the care plan would Incorporate identified problem areas and that care plans would be revised when resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents' pain was managed for 1 of 30 residents (Resident 216) sampled for pain management when Resident 216 complained of having pain in their ribs and low back while making facial expressions and exhibiting body movements that demonstrate signs related to the experience of pain. Resident 216 was unable to verbalize a specific number to represent the level of pain being experienced per the Pain Scale (standardized numeric scale to identify an individual's pain level. Scale rates pain from 0-10; 0 = no pain to 10 = most severe pain). Thus, Resident 216 did not receive pain medication per the medical doctor's (MD) orders. This failure had the potential to result in an overall increase of pain, decline in mobility, increased health issue complications, and diminished mental, emotional, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Pain Assessment and Management, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review indications for continued use or attempt Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR - tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by lowering or discontinuing medication) for 50 days for one of one sampled resident (Resident 50) receiving four psychotropic medications: (1) lorazepam (anti-anxiety medication that slows brain activity for relaxation), (2) Seroquel (anti-psychotic medication, indicated for psychosis, that improves mood, thoughts, and behaviors), (3) trazodone (anti-depressant medication), and (4) sertraline (anti-depressant - increases serotonin, a mood-enhancing chemical, in the brain). Psychotropic medications affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors and include anti-psychotic, anti-depressant, and anti-anxiety medications. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 50 to experience adverse (negative, potentially harmful) side effects including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor resident food preferences (food that was liked or disliked) and did not serve accurate portions when: 1. One out of five sampled residents (Resident 45) stated, the facility served food that Resident 45 did not like. 2. The facility did not provide the correct portion size of fish to residents during lunch on 8/29/24. These failures had the potential for unintended weight gain or unintended weight loss which could negatively impact resident health. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's undated policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Foods Brought by Family/Visitors, indicated, resident food choices would be honored when able. A review of Resident 45's undated admission Record, indicated, admission to the facility on 5/14/24 with the diagnoses of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (stomach acid backs up into the tube that connected the stomach to the throat) and major depressive disorder (a sad mood). Resident 45 was her own responsible party (RP, made own decisions). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain equipment in good repair when the pots and fry pans had a black build up on the outside, the inside protective layer of the fry pans was missing (caused metal to be exposed), and one fry pan had a thick, black buildup of material on the inside where food was cooked. This failure had the potential to contaminate food and cause a decline in resident health. Findings: The facility's undated policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Sanitation, indicated, all equipment would be kept clean and in good repair. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/29/24 at 11:10 a.m., located in the facility's kitchen, with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the pots and fry pans were observed. The pots and fry pans had a black build up on the outside, the protective layer on the inside of the fry pans was missing, and one fry pan had a thick, layer of black residue on the inside, where resident food was cooked. CDM confirmed the findings and stated, CDM had ordered new pots and pans last week. A copy of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's needs and choices for personal hygiene (dressing, grooming, and oral care) were met for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, and 3). This failure had the potential to adversely affect the resident's psychosocial well-being by not receiving hygiene and feeling dirty. Findings: A review of the facility's policy, titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting , revised 3/2018, the policy indicated: 1. Residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services to ensure that their activities of daily living (ADLs) do not diminish . 2. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLS independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). b. Mobility (transfer and ambulation, including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation to meet the resident's need and preferences for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3), when a shower schedule was not provided and a shower was offered before bedtime, which was too late according to the resident's preferences. This failure resulted in Resident 3 missing her shower and feeling disappointed. Findings: During a review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting , revised 3/2018, the policy indicated: 1. Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. 2. Interventions to improve or minimize a resident's functional abilities will be in accordance with the resident's assessed needs, preferences, stated goals and recognized standards of practice. During a review of Resident 3's clinical record, indicated that she was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-10-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement plan (QAPI) committee identified and developed action plans to correct the deficient practices in the delivery of quality nursing care, prior to the survey findings. These failures resulted in a substandard quality of nursing care and actual harm to one resident (Resident 99). These failures had the potential to further affect the health, safety and well-being of all of the residents in the facility and leave them vulnerable to poor quality nursing care. Findings: On 10/14/2021 at 1:15 PM, a concurrent interview and review of the facility's QAPI binder was conduced with the Admin. The Admin stated that it is the responsibility of each department manager to identify resident care areas that need improvement. The department manager should then bring their quality of care concerns to the QAPI committee meetings that are held monthly and quarterly. The purpose of the meetings were to identify and develop action plans to correct these deficient areas. This should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-14 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff completed timely a comprehensive quarterly assessment for one of 12 residents (Resident 99). This failure resulted in no plan of care for Resident 99's non-verbal pain to go unrecognized and untreated. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised December 2016, indicated a comprehensive, person centered care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the required Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment). At least quarterly the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- group of health care disciplines that discuss resident care needs) in conjunction with the quarterly MDS will meet to review and update the care plan. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident's conditions change. A review of Resident 99's record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included peripheral vascular disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or revise the care plans for three of three sampled residents (Resident 346, 29, and 99) when: 1. Resident 346 had no care plan developed for a pressure injury (bed sore) and for psychotropic drug use (drugs that alter mood and behavior). This resulted in Resident 346 having no plan for the treatment of her pressure injury and no goals for using psychotropic drugs. 2. Resident 29's care plan was not revised with specific interventions for irrigating a suprapubic catheter (a tube that goes directly into the bladder from the abdomen to drain urine when the kidneys no longer work). This resulted in Resident 29 receiving unsterile catheter care when it should have been sterile. 3. Resident 99 did not have a care plan developed for non verbal pain and for her peripheral vascular disease (decreased blood flow). This resulted in Resident 99's non verbal signs of pain and decreased blood flow in her right leg to go unrecognized and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement it's care plan for one of 37 residents (Resident 10) according to policy on falls. This resulted in the resident experiencing a fall, and created the potential for further falls, injury, illness and death. Findings: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with acute respiratory disease (rapid onset of a breathing problem), multiple sclerosis (a disease that attacks muscle coordination), Alzheimer's, dementia, and a history of falling. A review of the facility's record titled Falls: Policy and Implementation (Revised March, 2018) indicated: The staff, with the input of the attending physician, will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls. Further, In conjunction with the attending physician, staff will identify and implement relevant interventions. A review of Resident 10's medical record included a Fall Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete pain management assessment, develop and implemented a comprehensive person-centered plan for non verbal pain for one of four residents (Resident 99). As a result, Resident 99 suffered unnecessary severe pain from a blot clot that required surgical intervention for a right above knee amputation. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled, Administering Pain Medications, revised October 2017, indicated pain management is the process of alleviating residents pain to a level that is acceptable to the resident. Be familiar with non verbal signs of pain for example: groaning, crying, screaming, facial expressions of grimacing and frowning, changes in skin color, behaviors such as resisting care, irritability, decreased participation in activities, guarding, and loss of appetite. Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale for non verbal cognitively impaired (dementia) residents. Conduct an interview or observation for resident pain status, for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the competencies and skill set necessary to provide nursing care for 3 of 12 sampled residents (Residents 20, 29 and 99) when: 1. Nursing staff did not have sufficient knowledge to appropriately assess and manage a PICC line for Resident 20 when a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) (a medical device that was placed into a large vein to allow access to the bloodstream) clotted two times, the tip of the PICC was not in a favorable position for IV therapy to be administered, two doses of antibiotic therapy were missed, the PICC line cap was missing, and physcian orders for catheter flush was incorrect; 2. Nursing staff did not have sufficient knowledge of sterile bladder irrigation technique for Resident 29; and 3. Nursing staff failed to do skin assessments for Resident 99 and Resident 20. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's contracted pharmacy's ( the pharmacy that provided and supported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-14 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Dietetic Services observation, Registered Dietitian and Dietary Services Supervisor interview, and departmental document review, the facility failed: 1) To ensure the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) completed the required 6 hours of State regulatory training prior to assuming the leadership role. 2) To ensure the Registered Dietitian and/or Dietary Services Supervisor provided comprehensive oversight and staff guidance when: 2A) Staff did not perform food safety procedures such as food thawing, labeling and dating, food temperature monitoring, according to professional standards of practice. 2B) There was not an effective system in place to ensure cooks prepared adequate food to meet resident nutrition needs and preferences. 2C) There was not an effective system in place to ensure staff initial training, competency, and adequate monitoring of competence or performance during day to day operations. These failures have to potential to result in foodborne illness and to negatively impact meal satisfaction, meal intake and overall health of residents who receive food from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-14 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff were competent to perform food preparation and food safety processes according to professional standards when: 1. Two staff did not monitor food cooking and serving temperatures consistently to ensure food safety and palatability. 2. Two staff did not follow menu spreadsheets or prepare and serve adequate amounts of food to meet menu requirements and resident needs. 3. Staff did not correctly label and date food. 4. Staff did not use safe food thawing processes. Failure to ensure staff are competent to complete essential job and food safety functions increases the potential for foodborne illness to occur and also increases the risk that meals provided will not meet the nutritional needs and preferences of residents. It has the potential to negatively impact resident's meal satisfaction, meal intake and overall health. Findings: Review of a document titled Job Description: Cook showed the cook is responsible to ensure that foods are prepared and served at the proper temperature and at the proper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a menu in accordance with physicians' orders, cultural/ethnic needs and/or resident preference for 3 out of 3 residents (Residents 27, 39 and 195) with a vegetarian diet order. This failure increased the risk that meals provided to vegetarian residents would not meet their nutritional needs and had the potential to negatively impact resident's meal satisfaction, meal intake and overall health. Findings: A tray ticket is a document placed on each resident's meal tray every meal. It provided direction for what staff should place on each resident's tray. It showed the resident's name, room number, diet order, food allergies/dislikes, beverages/special equipment to be provided, and food preferences. During an observation, concurrent record review, and interview with the Registered Dietitian (RD) on 10/11/21 at 9:15 AM, the RD was asked to provide a copy of the facility menu titled Good For Your Health Menus Fall, Week 2, dated October…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and distributed in accordance with professional food safety standards when: 1) Food was not thawed, labeled, dated, or discarded appropriately. 2) Cooked food temperatures were not consistently monitored or documented. 3) Food service equipment was not clean, and manufacturer's instructions were not followed when sanitizing fixed equipment. 4) Staff personal food and personal possessions were in use in food preparation areas. These practices have the potential to result in foodborne illness for residents consuming food from the facility food services. Findings: 1) Food was not thawed, labeled, dated, or discarded appropriately. 1.A. Thawing Nutritional Shakes - During an observation in the kitchen on 10/11/21 at 9:00 AM the single door reach-in refrigerator near the coffee machine contained a plastic bin of individual cartons of nutritional shakes dated Prepared on date 10/11. The shakes were completely thawed and did not feel cold. The external temperature indicator read 33…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-14 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have an effective process in place to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 39) and all residents that had food items brought into the facility, were able to receive safe and sanitary food brought in by family or others, and receive assistance with reheating and preparation of food when: 1. Food was not allowed if it did not comply with the resident's diet order. 2. Hot food brought in by family or others was discarded if not eaten within an hour. 3. Nursing would not reheat food for residents. Findings: During an observation of tray line on 10/11/21 at 9:50 AM, the tray tickets (list resident diet order, allergies, food preferences) showed 3 residents (Res) (Res-27, Res-39, Res195) had diet orders including Vegetarian. During an observation and concurrent interview on 10/12/21 09:58 AM, a small, white, refrigerator for storage of resident food was in the nursing station medication room. It contained nutrition supplement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their infection prevention policies and procedures for 3 of 7 sampled residents when: 1. They performed bladder irrigations (using a large syringe with a solution to flush out sediment and matter that may plug the drainage of the catheter) on the resident without using a sterile technique (creating a sterile (germ free) field for the procedure) or sterile supplies (sterile gloves and sterile bladder irrigation kits) and; 2. Nursing staff provided incontinent care (cleansing after emptying the bowel and bladder) without changing gloves or sanitizing their hands before continuing with other care and; 3. Oxygen tubing was observed on the floor beneath the oxygen concentrator (a machine powered by electricity that separates oxygen from the air and delivers it to the resident via the tubing). These failures had the potential to negatively impact the resident's quality of life and quality of care by exposing them to unnecessary bacteria…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to make sure that the call system was within reach for one of twelve sampled residents (Resident 9). This failure had the potential to put Resident 9 at risk for not getting help when needed which could have threatened their well-being. Findings: Review of the facility policy, titled, Answering the Call Light, dated 1/1/2001, indicated that staff were instructed to make sure that the call light was within easy reach of the resident. Staff were to have reported all defective call lights to the nurse supervisor promptly. Review of the facility document, titled, C.N.A. Clinical Performance Evaluation, dated 9/1/2019, showed a checklist of skills that Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were to have demonstrated. Under the Performance Area category of Safety Awareness, the first item listed was, Call cord within reach. Review of Resident 9's clinical record showed admission to the facility on 3/20/2021 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a chronic disease of the central nervous system that affected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a physician of a change of condition for one of 12 residents (Resident 99) when she had severe pain caused by decreased blood circulation in her right leg. This resulted in Resident 99 having continued severe pain due to a blood clot that required surgical intervention of removing her right leg above the knee. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled, Change in Resident's Condition or Status, revised December 2016, indicated the facility staff should promptly notify the resident, attending physician in changes in a residents medical/mental condition. The Licensed Nurse (LN) will notify physician when a significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition and the need to alter the resident's medical treatment. A significant change of condition is a major decline in the resident's status that will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff. The nurse will make detailed observations and gather relevant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to maintain good grooming and hygiene for one of twelve sampled residents (Resident 9) when the resident's fingernails were long and dirty. This failure had the potential to cause breaks in Resident 9's skin and to spread germs which could have caused infections. Findings: Review of the facility document, titled, C.N.A. Clinical Performance Evaluation, dated 9/1/2019, showed a checklist of skills that Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were to have demonstrated. Under the Performance Area category of Personal Care Skills, one of the items listed was, Fingernails clean. Review of the facility policy, titled, Care of Fingernails/Toenails, revised 10/1/2010, indicated its purpose was to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections. Under the general guidelines listed, the policy indicated that trimmed and smooth nails prevented the resident from accidentally scratching and injuring their skin. Staff were instructed not to trim the nails of diabetic residents or residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff developed and implemented a resident plan of care for two of four residents (Resident 99 and ) when: 1. Resident 99's change of condition for skin and pain were not identifed through the nursing assessments. This failure resulted in Resident 99 to have severe pain and required surgical intervention for a right above knee amputation. 2. The nursing staff failed to provide appropriate care and services according to facility's policy and professional standards of care to assess and maintain Resident 20's Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) (A soft, long catheter that is inserted into a vein in the arm and the tip is positioned in a large vein near the heart). This failure caused the PICC line to be replaced two times, two doses of antibiotic therapy to be missed, and an increased risk of infection for Resident 20. Findings: A review of Resident 99's record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three residents (Resident 10) from accidental hazards when it did not follow its policy for resident safety. This resulted in a resident's fall and the potential for further falls, injury, illness and death. Refer to tag F658. Findings: Resident 10's record was reviewed. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute respiratory disease (onset of a breathing problem), multiple sclerosis (a disease that attacks muscle coordination), Alzheimer's, dementia, and a history of falling. A review of the facility's record titled Safety and Supervision of Residents dated January 2011 indicated, Safety risks and environmental hazards are identified on an ongoing basis through a combination of employee training, employee monitoring, and reporting processes; QA&A (Quality Assessment and Assurance) reviews of safety and incident/accident reports; and a facility-wide commitment to safety at all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 3 of 5 sampled Residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic drug use (drugs that are used to control or alter mood and behavior such as antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant and hypnotic medications), when they either monitored the wrong side effect for the drug, had no monitor in place, or had not monitored a target symptom (behavior). This lack of correct monitoring had the potential to negatively impact the Residents quality of life by subjecting them to unrecognized potentially life-threatening and uncomfortable adverse medication side effects and impair their mental, physical and emotional well-being. (Residents 29, 38 and 346). Findings: According to LexiComp, an online drug information site for professionals: The adverse side effects of ANTIPSYCHOTIC drugs include; Life threatening heart rhythms, Akathisia (muscle quivering and inability to sit still), Parkinsonism (tremors, stiffness, slow movements, and loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 2.9 | +2.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUDSON RIVER OPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/01/2019 |
| BAY BRIDGE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/16/2015 |
| VEMULAPALLI, SHAILAJA | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 08/09/2022 |
| LARSEN, JORIN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/03/2023 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $567K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055092. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.