No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Riverdale Post Acute

2311 E Bridge St, Brighton, CO 80601 · For profit - Corporation · 105 certified beds · (303) 659-2253 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)1 actual-harm citation1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
30 S 20th Ave · (303) 659-4000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1821 E Bridge St · (720) 685-3099 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.6 mi
1605 E Bridge St · (303) 659-6461 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1855 E Southern St · (303) 655-2200 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1929 E Egbert St · (303) 659-1420

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.0%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.2%4.7%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.6%8.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.1%13.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.9%11.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%94.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.1%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.2%21.2%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table39.0%20.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication8.7%1.6%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine23.8%75.6%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.371.381.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.231.741.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.09U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
0.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.13
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
37.0%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 94.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-26)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2023-07-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#97, #37 and #47) of eight residents reviewed for accident hazards out of 36 sample residents remained as free from accidents as possible. Resident #97, who was known to be at risk for falls, was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, hearing impairment, unsteady and shuffling gait, and right sided weakness. The facility initiated a fall care plan which included interventions of anticipating and meeting the resident's needs, encouraging rest periods when signs of fatigue were noted, ensuring that the resident wore appropriate footwear when ambulating and keeping the resident in line of sight as needed. Resident #97 sustained falls with injury on 12/30/24 (abrasion to the right side of his head), 1/12/25 (laceration to his head) and 1/19/25 (abrasion to the back of his head). Resident #97 was sent to the emergency department (ED) for evaluation and treatment after each of the three falls. However, the facility failed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from risk of accidents and hazards for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards out of nine sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure neurological assessments were completed after Resident #1's unwitnessed fall, which resulted in a head injury.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Head Injury policy, revised October 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/16/26 at 4:15 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to report potential head injuries to the physician and implement interventions to prevent further injury. Assess residents following a known, suspected, or verbalized head injury. The assessment shall include, at a minimum: vital signs, general condition and appearance, neurological evaluation for changes in physical functioning, behavior, cognition, level of consciousness, dizziness, nausea, irritability,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen.Specifically, the facility failed to serve the residents meals at appropriate temperatures. Findings include:I. Professional referenceThe Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, revised 3/16/24, was retrieved on 4/28/26. It revealed in pertinent part, Time/Temperature control for safety food shall be maintained at 135 degrees F (Fahrenheit) or above and 41 degrees F or less. (3-501.16 ) II. Facility policy and procedureThe Food Preparation and Service policy, revised November 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/22/26 at 6:11 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, When verifying food temperatures, staff use a thermometer which is both clean, sanitized, and calibrated to ensure accuracy. The danger zone for food temperatures is above 41 degrees F and below 135 degrees F. This temperature range promotes the rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that cause foodborne illness. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Contact the physician for clarification on what type of precaution Resident #3 needed; and,-Communicate the precautions to the staff clarify and communicate Resident #3's isolation precautions. I. Facility policy and procedure The Multidrug-Resistant Organisms policy, dated December 2024, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/22/26 at 6:11 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are bacteria and other microorganisms that have developed resistance to one or more classes of antimicrobial drugs. Infection means the organism is present and is causing illness. Colonization means that the organism is present in or on the body but is not causing illness. The following strategies are based on current recommendations for MDRO prevention and control: Implement systems…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#5, and #8) of six residents reviewed out of 13 sample residents were kept free from resident-to-resident physical abuse.Specifically the facility failed to: -Protect Resident #8 from physical abuse by Resident #14; and, -Protect Resident #5 from physical abuse by Resident #9. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program Policy and Procedure, revised April 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) via email on 2/19/26 at 2:15 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. The resident abuse, neglect and exploitation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were properly stored, secured and labeled in accordance with accepted professional standards. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure medication and treatment carts was kept locked when not being monitored by nursing staff;-Ensure residents' medications were stored in a locked cabinet when not being monitored by the medication administration nurse; and,-Ensure residents' medications were not prepoured into medication cups, stacked on top of one another on the medication cart and left unattended in a common area of the facility.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe facility policy for medication storage was requested on 1/22/26 at 3:48 p.m., however, the policy was not provided by the end of the survey on 1/22/26. II. ObservationsOn 1/20/26, from 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m., and again on 1/21/26, from 9:48 a.m. to 11:20 a.m., the treatment cart closest to the front entrance was observed to be unlocked and unmonitored by nursing staff.On 1/22/26, from 12:15 p.m. to 12:30 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection.Specifically, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practices during wound care for Resident #4.Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Guideline For Hand Hygiene In Health Care Settings, (2/27/24) retrieved on 2/3/26 from https://www.cdc.gov/clean-hands/hcp/clinical-safety, Efficacy of Promotion and Impact of Improved Hand Hygiene: evidence supports the belief that improved hand hygiene can reduce health-care-associated infection rates. Failure to perform appropriate hand hygiene is considered the leading cause of health-care-associated infections and spread of multiresistant organisms and has been recognized as a substantial contributor to outbreaks.II. ObservationsOn 1/22/26 at 10:00 a.m. licensed practical nurse (LPN) #1 was observed performing wound care for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure seven (#16, #17, #19, #8, #4, #18 and #11) of 17 residents reviewed for abuse out of 18 sample residents were kept free from abuse.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure Resident #16 and Resident #17 were kept free from physical abuse toward each other on 6/7/25;-Ensure Resident #17 was kept free from physical abuse by Resident #19 on 7/29/25;-Ensure Resident #8 was kept free from physical abuse by Resident #17 on 8/14/25;-Ensure Resident #17 was kept free from physical abuse by Resident #19 on 8/31/25;-Ensure Resident #19 and Resident #17 were kept free from physical abuse toward each other on 9/17/25;-Ensure Resident #4 was kept free from physical abuse by Resident #5 on 6/18/25;-Ensure Resident #18 was kept free from physical abuse by Resident #5 on 8/10/25; and,-Ensure Resident #11 was kept free from physical abuse by Resident #12 on 7/9/25.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report alleged violations of physical abuse to the State Survey and Certification Agency in accordance with state law for two (#6 and #17) of 17 residents reviewed for abuse out of 18 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure incidents of alleged physical abuse involving Resident #6 and Resident #17 were reported to the State Survey Agency (SSA). Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation Reporting and Investigating policy and procedure, dated September 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 10/1/25 at 6:31 p.m. It read in pertinent part, All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen and in three of three unit nourishment refrigerators. Specifically the facility failed to: -Ensured the nourishment room refrigerators were maintained at a safe temperature; -Ensure health shakes were labeled in the unit nourishment refrigerators; and, -Ensure the floor, walls and ice machine in the main kitchen were maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. Findings include: I. Ensure safe cold food holding temperatures were maintained and health shakes were labeled in the nourishment refrigerators A. Professional reference The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, (3/16/24), retrieved on 4/2/25, read in pertinent part, Except during preparation, cooking, or cooling, or when time is used as the public health control time/temperature control for safety food shall be maintained at 135 degrees fahrenheit (F) or above at 41 F or less. (3-501.16) B. Observations On 3/23/25 at 10:30 a.m. the following was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-26 · tag F0848 — widespread
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility's binding arbitration agreement contained the required components. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure the arbitration agreement presented to residents contained language that provided for the selection of a venue that was convenient to both parties; and, -Provide for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Binding Arbitration Agreement policy, dated November 2023, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/26/25 at 6:24 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Residents (or representatives) are informed of the nature and implications of any proposed binding arbitration agreements so as to make informed decisions on whether to enter into such agreements. Residents (or their representatives) have the right to make informed decisions about the important aspects of their health, welfare and safety. Arbitration agreements provide for the selection of a neutral arbitrator, which is agreed upon by both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity by providing care in a dignified, respectful and individualized manner for one (#26) of four residents reviewed out of 36 sample residents and on one of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure residents who were prescribed a puree diet received the menu options as listed on the main menu or according to their preference and prescribed diet order; and, -Provide residents on the Aspen unit with non-disposable beverage cups at meals. Findings include: I. Failed to ensure residents who were prescribed a puree diet, received the menu options as listed on the main menu or according to their preference and prescribed diet order A. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Food Preferences policy, revised July 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/26/25 at 11:32 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team. Modifications to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four (#59, #39, #97 and #42) of nine residents out of 36 sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Protect Resident #59 and Resident #39 from sexual abuse by Resident #62; -Protect Resident #97 and Resident #34 from physical abuse by each other; and, -Protect Resident #42 from physical abuse by Resident #58. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program policy, revised April 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/23/25 at 12:41 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents have the right to be free from abuse. The facility will implement measures to address factors that may lead to abusive situations. The facility will identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property. The facility will investigate and report any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for three (#1, #75 and #249) of six residents out of 36 sample residents for services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address Resident #1's use of supplemental oxygen and a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC); and, -Ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address Resident #75 and Resident #249's insomnia. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans policy, revised March 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/26/25 at 6:42 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#95, #75 and #249) of five residents out of 36 sample residents were as free from unnecessary medications as possible. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure consents were obtained that included the risks versus benefits for psychotropic medications for Resident #95, Resident #75 and Resident #249; and. -Ensure Resident #95 and Resident #75 had behavior monitoring in place for the use of psychotropic medications. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Psychotropic Medication Use policy, revised July 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/26/25 at 6:24 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Drugs in the following categories are considered psychotropic medications and are subject to specific prescribing, monitoring, and review requirements: anti-psychotics, anti-depressants, anti-anxiety medications and hypnotics. Residents, families and/or the representative are involved in the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received food and fluids prepared in a form designed to meet his or her needs. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents who were prescribed mechanically altered diets had food prepared according to their diet orders of puree and mechanical soft as indicated on their meal tray cards. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Therapeutic Diets policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/26/25 at 11:32 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Diet orders should match the terminology used by the food and nutrition services department. A therapeutic diet is considered a diet ordered by a physician, practitioner, or dietitian as part of treatment for disease or clinical condition, to modify specific nutrients in the diet, or to alter the texture of a diet, for example: altered consistency diet. If a mechanically altered diet is ordered, the provider will specify the texture modification. The dietitian, nursing staff and attending physician will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility's binding arbitration agreement was thoroughly and accurately explained to the residents and or resident representatives before signing the agreement for three (#54, #85 and #96) of four residents out of 36 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Thoroughly explain the binding arbitration agreement in a form and in a manner to ensure Resident #54, Resident #85 and Resident #96 and/or their representatives understood the agreement before signing the arbitration agreement; and, -Ensure the facility staff provided evidence Resident #54, Resident #85 and Resident #96 and/or their representatives acknowledged understanding of the components of the agreement. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Binding Arbitration Agreement policy, November 2023, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/26/25 at 6:24 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Residents (or representatives) are informed of the nature and implications of any proposed binding arbitration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease on three of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure housekeeping staff followed appropriate hand hygiene processes when cleaning resident rooms; -Ensure high touch surfaces in residents' rooms were cleaned; -Ensure housekeeping staff followed proper cleaning techniques when cleaning residents' bathrooms; and, -Ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed for Resident #1, who had a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Findings include: I. Housekeeping failures A. Professional references According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), CDC Clinical Safety, Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Worker (2/17/24), retrieved on 4/1/25 from https://www.cdc.gov/clean-hands/hcp/clinical-safety, Know when to clean your hands: immediately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms, bathrooms, dining room furniture and hallways received necessary maintenance repairs. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Safe and Homelike Environment policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/25/25 at 1:53 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, The facility will provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment. This ensures that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk. Environment refers to any location in the facility that is frequented by residents. A homelike environment is one that de-emphasizes the institutional character of the setting. Housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to keep resident medical records in a secure and confidential manner. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident meal tickets were stored privately and not accessible to guests to review in order to protect the confidentiality of resident information. Findings include: I. Observations During a continuous observation on 3/25/25, beginning at 11:10 a.m. and ending at 12:37 p.m., the following was observed during the meal preparation and service in the main kitchen and dining room: At 11:10 a.m. resident meal trays were being assembled in the main kitchen by cook (CK) #1. Resident meal tickets were observed in two separate places in the service window between the kitchen and main dining room. The meal tickets were on the left side of the serving counter and on the right side on top of the steam table. The meal tickets contained resident names and physician prescribed diet orders. At 11:37 a.m. a resident representative approached the service window in the dining room and picked up the resident meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report alleged violations of potential abuse to the State Survey and Certification Agency in accordance with state law for one (#62) of nine residents reviewed for abuse out of 36 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to report an incident of potential sexual abuse involving Resident #62 to the State Survey Agency (SSA). Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program policy, revised April 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/23/25 at 12:41 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents have the right to be free from abuse. The facility will identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property. The facility will investigate and report any allegations within timeframes required by federal requirements. II. Resident #62 A. Resident status Resident #62, age [AGE], was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to document resuscitation choices accurately in the medical record for one (#50) of three residents reviewed for advanced directives out of 36 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to document Resident #50's refusal to complete a medical orders for scope of treatment (MOST) form (a legal document that allows individuals to outline their wishes for medical interventions and end-of-life care, ensuring their preferences are followed in the event of a serious illness or decline in health) upon admission to the facility or that the resident's resuscitation choices were discussed with the resident or the resident's representative. Findings include: I. Resident #50 A. Resident status Resident #50, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the [DATE] computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a lung disease with airway obstruction), chronic respiratory failure, type 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of one resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice out of 36 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order and provide routine maintenance and care for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) for Resident #1. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to The National Institutes of Health (NIH) PICC Line Placement (1/10/24), retrieved on 4/2/25 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK573064/, Dressings should be changed at least once weekly or per policy and manufacturer's guidelines. After each use, the PICC line should be flushed with normal saline and heparin solution. Nurses are responsible for day-to-day care, education, and monitoring of patients with PICC lines, reporting any concerns promptly. Careful monitoring and maintenance of these lines are paramount in preventing procedural complications. II. Resident #1 A. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#50) of three residents out of 36 sample residents received the care and services necessary to meet their nutrition needs to maintain their highest level of physical well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to weigh Resident #50, who was identified to have potential nutrition problems, upon admission to monitor the resident's nutritional status. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Weight Assessment and Interventions policy, revised March 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/26/25 at 9:09 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents weights are monitored for undesirable or united weight loss or gain. Residents are weighed upon admission and at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team (IDT). Weights are recorded in each unit's weight record chart and in the individual's medical record. Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment is retaken the next…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with a feeding tube received appropriate treatment and services for one (#96) of three residents reviewed out of 36 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #96 was assessed to ensure her safety while self-administering her tube feedings. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Enteral Nutrition (feeding tube) policy, revised November 2018, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA), on 3/26/25 at 11:43 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Adequate nutritional support through enteral nutrition is provided to residents as ordered. Staff caring residents with feeding tubes are trained on how to recognize and report complications associated with the insertion and/or use of a feeding tube, such as aspiration, skin breakdown around the insertion site, and clogging of the tube. Residents receiving enteral nutrition are periodically reassessed for the continued appropriateness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication administration error rate was not greater than five percent (%). Specifically, the facility's medication administration error rate was 6.06%, or two errors out of 33 opportunities for error. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to [NAME], P.A., [NAME], A.G., et.al., Fundamentals of Nursing, 10 ed., E.[NAME], St. Louis Missouri, pp. 606-607. Take appropriate actions to ensure the patient receives medication as prescribed and within the times prescribed and in the appropriate environment. Professional standards such as nursing scope and standards of practice apply to the activity of medication administration. To prevent medication errors, follow the seven rights of medication administration consistently every time you administer medications. Many medication errors can be linked in some way to an inconsistency in adhering to these seven rights: 1. The right medication 2. The right dose 3. The right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to meet all the requirements for the provision of hospice care for one (#26) of five residents out of 36 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the hospice agency notes regarding Resident #26's care were easily accessible to the facility staff in an attempt to effectively coordinate care with the hospice agency. Findings include: I. Facility-Hospice contract The contract between the facility and the hospice services company, dated 7/10/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/25/25 at 3:08 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The hospice and nursing facility shall each prepare and maintain complete and detailed clinical records concerning each residential hospice patient receiving services under this agreement. Each clinical record shall completely, promptly, and accurately document all services provided to, and events concerning, each hospice patient. The hospice and the nursing facility shall each retain such…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one of three units were free from accident hazards. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the alarm on the door to the outside secured patio was functioning properly. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure On 1/13/25 at 12:49 p.m. the director of nursing (DON) said the facility followed the state guidelines for the secured unit. The DON provided a copy of the state guidelines, which read read in pertinent part, Any facility that has one or more resident care units that are secured to prohibit free egress of residents shall comply with the standards in this section in addition to all other applicable requirements of this chapter. Staff in the secure environment shall be experienced and trained in the particular needs and care of its residents. The facility shall identify its method for securing the area and establish and implement procedures for monitoring the effectiveness of the security system. II. Observations On 1/13/25 at 12:15 p.m. the back door on the all-male secured unit was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of pests. Specifically, the facility failed to take the appropriate measures to control a fly infestation in the kitchen and dining room. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC) Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health-Care Facilities, pp. 95 (updated 1/8/24), retrieved on 7/25/24 from https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/hcp/environmental-control/environmental-services.html#cdc_generic_section_6-6-pest-control, Cockroaches, spiders, and mice are among the typical pest populations found in health-care facilities. Insects and rodents can serve as agents for the mechanical transmission of microorganisms, or as active participants in the disease transmission process by passing pathogens from one source to another. Insects and rodents should be kept out of all areas of a health-care facility. From a public health and hygiene perspective, pests should be eradicated from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective program of pest management to ensure the facility was free of pests. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the main kitchen, dining rooms, resident rooms and hallways were free from flies on three out of three units. Findings include: I. Professional references According to the Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations (last amended 1/1/19) retrieved on 8/1/23 from https://cdphe.colorado.gov/environment/food-regulations, The premises shall be maintained free of insects, rodents, and other pests. The presence of insects, rodents, and other pests shall be controlled to eliminate their presence on the premises by routinely inspecting incoming shipments of food and supplies, routinely inspecting the premises for evidence of pests, using methods, if pests are found, such as trapping devices or other means of pest control, and eliminating harborage conditions. If the windows or doors of a food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's had the right to a dignified existence. Specifically, the facility failed to provide a dignified living experience adequate by answering resident call lights timely in two of three units that resulted in call light response times up to two hours and 55 minutes. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Answering the Call Light policy, revised October 2010, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/27/23 at 1:07 p.m. It read in pertinent part, When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair, be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. Report all defective call lights to the nurse supervisor promptly. Answer the resident's call light as soon as possible. Be courteous in answering the resident's call. Steps in the procedure: turn off the signal light; identify yourself and call the resident by his or her name; list to the resident's request; do what the resident asks of you if permitted; if uncertain ask the nurse supervisor for assistance. II. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure freedom from resident-to-resident abuse for three (#71, #43 and #10) of six residents reviewed out of 35 sample residents. Specifically the facility failed to ensure Residents #71, #43 and #10 were free from abuse by Resident #39. All four residents lived in the secure unit. Cross-reference F744, dementia care services. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation Prevention Program policy, last revised in April 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/24/23. It read in pertinent part: Protect residents from abuse by anyone including, but not limited to: other residents. Develop and implement policies and protocols to prevent and identify: abuse or mistreatment of residents. Identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse. II. Abuse incidents involving Resident #39 against other residents Facility investigation reports and medical record documentation revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-27 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct yearly certified nurse aide (CNA) performance reviews and provide training based on the annual reviews for five (#2, #4, #5, #6 and #7) of five CNA training files reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to provide performance evaluation reviews annually and provide 12 hours of regular in-service education on the outcome of these reviews for CNAs hired prior to July 2022. Findings include: I. Record review Upon review of five CNA training files, it was identified none of the five CNAs had evidence a performance review was completed and annual competencies or associated training totaling 12 hours per year was completed. CNAs reviewed included CNA #2, CNA #4, CNA #5, CNA #6 and CNA #7. The inservice records were reviewed starting July 2022 and documented the title of the inservice and date of completion, but failed to show total hours completed. II. Staff interview The nursing home administrator (NHA) was interviewed on 7/27/23 at 12:30 p.m. She said the competencies were included in the online inservice as post…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-27 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure three (#39, #10 and #71) of six residents reviewed for dementia care of 32 sample residents received the appropriate dementia care treatment and services to maintain their highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically the facility failed to: -Assess, identify and implement measures to engage Residents #39, #10 and #71 activities to help prevent resident-to-resident altercations; -Update care plans following resident to resident abuse incidents for Resident #39, #10 and #71; and, -Ensure interventions were implemented to prevent Resident #39 from abusing other residents further. Findings include: I. Resident #39 A. Resident status Resident #39, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO) diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain (decreased ability to think, concentrate, or remember), mood disorder due to known physiological condition (traumatic brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received food that was palatable, attractive, and an appetizing temperature. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure food was palatable and attractive when delivered to residents; -Ensure food was served at a safe and appetizing temperature; and, -Provide condiments with meals. Findings include: I. Resident interviews Resident #56 was interviewed on 7/24/23 at 10:13 a.m. The resident said she had received burnt eggs. The resident said lunch was usually yucky and the food was runny and cold. Resident #25 was interviewed on 7/24/23 at 10:18 a.m. Resident #25 said the food was horrible and she tried not to eat what they had available at the facility. She said her daughter brought in food because the facility's food was very bad. Resident #45 was interviewed on 7/24/23 at 10:31 a.m. The resident said the food was bad and the bananas were overripe. Resident #24 was interviewed on 7/24/23 at 10:42 a.m. The resident said the food was bad and she would not eat it. She said if she ate the food she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure one (#81) of five residents reviewed out of 35 sample residents receive proper foot care and treatment according to standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #81 was seen by the podiatrist timely for toenail care. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Referral Agreements policy, revised October 2008, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/27/23 at 1:07 p.m. It read in pertinent part, To facilitate referrals, the facility has entered into referral agreements with agencies that will provide services to residents. The scope of agencies and the agreements are consistent with the needs of the facility's resident population. Inquiries concerning the availability and use of referral agencies should be directed to social services or to the Administrator. II. Resident status Resident #81, age under age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2023 computerized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to provide timely dental services to meet resident needs for one (#10) of three residents reviewed for dental services out of 35 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assist Resident #10 schedule a consultation for an oral surgeon to have his remaining teeth removed and to get fitted for dentures after the facility received the referral. Findings include I. Facility policy The Availability for Dental Services policy, revised August 2007, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/27/23 at 12:00 p.m. and read in pertinent part: Oral healthcare and dental services will be provided for each resident; -Social services will be responsible for making necessary dental appointments; -All requests for routine and emergency dental services should be directed to social services to assure that appointments can be made in a timely manner. II. Resident status Resident #10, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and observation the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences for one (#24) out of five sample residents were honored out of 35 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #24 with the preferred vegetarian diet. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Food Preferences policy and procedure, revised 2017, was delivered by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/26/23 at 12:40 p.m. It read in pertinent part: Upon the resident's admission the dietitian or nursing staff will identify a resident's food preferences. Nursing staff will document the resident's food and eating preferences in the care plan. The Food Services Department will offer a variety of foods at each scheduled meal, as well as access to nourishing snacks throughout the day and night. The facility's Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee will periodically review issues related to food preferences and meals to try to identify more widespread…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-03-26 · tag F0575 — widespread
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to post, in a form and manner accessible and understandable to residents, a list of names, addresses (mailing and email) and telephone numbers of all pertinent State Agencies and advocacy groups. Specifically, the facility failed to have the State Agencies contact information posted in a readable font size and placed in an area that had ease of access for the residents. Findings include: I. Resident council interview Six residents (#54, #86, #85, #69, #4 and #25) who frequently attended the monthly resident council meetings and were identified as alert and oriented by facility and assessment were interviewed on 3/25/25 at 10:35 a.m. All residents in attendance said they did not know how to file a complaint with the State Agency. II. Observations On 3/26/25 at 5:33 p.m. postings in the lobby of the main unit included the facility abuse coordinator information, the ombudsman contact information, the state agency phone number and website address, and a list of the residents' rights. -However, observations did not reveal any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-24 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CENTENNIAL MASTER TENANT, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/11/2022
PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/30/2023
ANNEBERG, LEEIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/01/1988
MCDONALD, DONTREIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/26/2023
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$464K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 2%Other / private 25%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $464K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$293per resident / day
operating cost
$8,919per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$286per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Colorado
$10,159/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,182/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,584/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065378. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next