Mountain View Post Acute
835 Tenderfoot Hill Rd, Colorado Springs, CO 80906 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 180 certified beds · (719) 576-8380 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $29,224 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-16)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.2% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.8% | 4.7% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 1.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.4% | 8.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.4% | 13.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.8% | 11.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.2% | 94.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.1% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.1% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.0% | 20.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.4% | 1.6% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 61.2% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 8.3% | 20.3% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.0% | 12.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.90 | 1.38 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.39 | 1.74 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 57.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.2%CMS range 37.9–71.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 6.7–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 57.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 162.0 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure two (#93 and #62) of three out of 51 sampled residents with a pressure ulcer received the necessary treatment and services according to professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: Resident #93, who was at high risk for developing pressure wounds and an increased risk for developing infections, developed a sacral skin wound on 5/25/23 that progressed to a stage 4 sacral pressure wound. The facility failed to ensure effective and timely interventions were in place to prevent Resident #63 from the development of pressure wounds. The facility failed to assess, monitor and document skin assessments and pressure wounds. The facility failed to place timely interventions in the prevention of the development and progression of the pressure wound. -Due to facility failures, the resident experienced a stage 4 sacral pressure wound that became infected and required hospitalization and a surgical washout and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-11-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure for four (#75, #79, and #111) of five residents reviewed received the care and services necessary to meet their nutrition needs and to maintain their highest level of physical well-being, out of 54 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow physician orders for significant weight loss, consistently put interventions in place and timely address Resident #75 nutritional needs. Specifically, the facility failed to follow physician orders for weight loss, consistently put interventions in place and timely address Resident #79 nutritional needs. Resident #75 experienced a significant, unplanned weight loss of 12 % in three months. Resident #79 experienced an unplanned weight loss of 5.56 % in one month. Record review and interviews revealed the facility failed to ensure supplements ordered by the physician were being provided to Resident #75 and Resident #79 and additional interventions were assessed for the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#2) of three residents was kept free from physical abuse out of six sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #2 from physical abuse by Resident #3.Findings include:I. Incident of physical abuse towards Resident #2 by Resident #3 on 2/9/26The facility investigation documented that on 2/9/26 at 10:05 p.m. Resident #2 reported that Resident #3 called him a homosexual slur after requesting alcohol from him. Resident #2 said he was frustrated, confronted Resident #3 and grabbed his shirt. Resident #2 said after he grabbed Resident #3's shirt, Resident #3 then made contact with Resident #2's face with an open hand. Staff members intervened and ensured both residents stayed separated. Both residents were immediately assessed by nursing staff following the incident. No injuries were observed or reported for either resident. Fifteen minute checks and psychosocial check-ins were initiated, and nursing assessments were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, distributed and served under sanitary conditions in the main kitchen and three of three nourishment rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to:- Ensure employees performed hand hygiene appropriately;- Ensure food was labeled, dated and stored appropriately; - Ensure dishes were washed and sanitized at the correct temperature,- Ensure equipment was stored properly; and,- Ensure the nourishment room refrigerators were clean and maintained at safe temperatures. Findings include:I. Ensure employees performed hand hygiene appropriatelyA. Professional referenceThe Colorado Retail Food Regulations, (3/16/24) and retrieved on 12/15/25 read in pertinent part, Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms immediately before engaging in food preparation, including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles and: after touching bare human body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-11 · tag F0923 — widespreadHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate outside ventilation by means of windows and/or mechanical ventilation in four of four shower rooms.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the residents' shower room vents were functioning in four shower rooms. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Resident Environmental policy, undated, was provided by the corporate consultant on 12/11/25 at 8:33 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public.Have adequate outside ventilation by means of windows, or mechanical ventilation, or a combination of the two (resident bathrooms and service areas should be ventilated, as required by code).II. ObservationsOn 12/11/25 at 1:03 p.m., an environmental tour was conducted. The ventilation fan outlets in four out of four residents shower rooms were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality in two of two dining rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Provide a meal in a timely manner and did not notify the residents of the delay,-Serve residents at a table at the same time, and-Provide residents on the Monarch who were sitting in the dining room waiting for their meal that was delayed, with a drink or diversion. Finding include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Resident Rights policy statement, dated 2/21/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/11/25 at 4:11 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to a dignified existence and be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity.II. Observations of the main kitchen and dining roomDuring a continuous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable and homelike environment for residents on three of four units.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure residents were provided clean washcloths;-Ensure broken towel racks and window seals in residents room were fixed timely,-Ensure residents' rooms were clean; and,-Ensure the lights in the residents' shower room were fixed timely. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Homelike Environment policy, revised February 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/11/25 at 4:11 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. The facility staff and management maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include: a clean, sanitary and orderly environment.II. Environmental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four (#44, #74, #62 and #82) of six residents reviewed for activities out of 53 sample residents received an ongoing program of activities , designed to meet the needs and interests, and promote physical, mental and psychosocial well-being.Specifically, the facility failed to offer and provide personalized and group activity programs for Resident #44, #74, #62 and #82. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activities policy, revised 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/11/25 at 3:05 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences. Facility-sponsored group, individual, and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of each resident, as well as support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from risk of accidents and hazards for five of 10 residents reviewed on the secured unit out of 53 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to keep five resident beds in a safe position to prevent accident hazards. Findings include:I. Professional reference According to Effects of Bed Height on Balance during INgress and Egress from a Hospital Bed, (8/9/24) retrieved on 12/18/25 from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12439613/#:~:text=Additionally%2C%20optimizing%20hospital%20bed%20heights,balance%20and%20increasing%20fall%20risks, When a bed is set too high, the process of getting into it becomes difficult; patients may attempt to pull themselves up, which can cause instability and increase their chances of falling.II. Observations and interviewsOn 12/8/25 at 12:12 p.m. the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER] was elevated with the mattress surface level at approximately four feet.On 12/8/25 at 2:33…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure certified nurse aides (CNA) received at least 12 hours of annual in-service training that also included dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training to ensure continued competence for three out of five certified nurse aides (CNA) reviewed.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure CNA #3, CNA #4, and CNA #5 received 12 hours of continuing education annually. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe In-Service Training policy, revised in 2001, was provided by the corporate consultant on 12/11/25 at 8:33 p.m. It read in pertinent part, All staff must participate in initial orientation and annual in-service training.Training requirements are met prior to staff providing services to residents, annually, and as necessary based on the facility assessment.Completed training is documented by the staff development coordinator, or his or her designee, and should include the date and time of the training, the topic of the training, the method used for training, a summary of the competency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to inform residents of the possible outcome of their noncompliance with nutritional supplements for one (#62) out of three residents reviewed for weight loss out of 53 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to inform Resident #62 of the risks of significant weight loss. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Resident Rights policy, revised on 2/2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/11/25 at 3:51 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, The resident would be notified of his or her medical condition and of any changes in his or her condition and would be informed of, and participate in, his or her care planning and treatment.II. Resident #62A. Resident statusResident #62, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2025 computerized physician order (CPO), diagnoses included hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, displaced bicondylar fracture of the right tibia hemarthrosis (bleeding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to protect two (#111 and #66) of eight residents from abuse out of 53 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #111 and Resident #66 from physical abuse from each other. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/10/25 at approximately 4:00 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, intimidation, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations. Physical abuse includes, but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking.II.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#93) of three residents out of 53 sample residents received the proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Follow up after an eye appointment for Resident #93; and,-Assist Resident #93 to make an appointment for cataract surgery. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Hearing and Vision Services policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/11/25 at 4:00 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all residents have access to hearing and vision services and receive adaptive equipment as indicated. Staff should refer any identified need for hearing or vision services/appliances to the social worker/social service designee. Once vision or hearing services have been identified, the social worker/social service designee will assist the resident by making appointments and arranging for transportation.II. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure housekeeping staff followed proper cleaning procedures for cleaning and disinfecting resident rooms and high-frequency touched areas; and ,-Ensure housekeeping staff performed hand hygiene and glove changes appropriately. Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Environment Cleaning Procedures (5/4/23) was retrieved on 12/18/25 fromhttps://www.cdc.gov/healthcare-associated-infections/hcp/cleaning-global/procedures.html?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/hai/prevent/resource-limited/cleaning-procedures.htmlHigh-Touch Surfaces: The identification of high-touch surfaces and items in each patient care area is a necessary prerequisite to the development of cleaning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light system was functioning properly in its entirety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff could hear the call light alerts when working in areas away from the centralized staff work area, where the call light alarm sound was heard when there were no staff in the centralized work area to hear the alarm. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response policy, revised 1/25/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/16/25 at 3:45 p.m. It read in pertinent part: The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each resident's bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. Call lights will directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response. II. Observations On 4/15/25 at 10:56 a.m., during the walkthrough of the facility, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#6) of three residents out of seven sample residents received the highest practicable treatment and care per professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #6 received her medications in a timely manner, as prescribed. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to [NAME], P.A. and [NAME], A.G. et.al., (2021), Fundamentals of Nursing, 10 edition, pp 607-609. Medication errors can cause or lead to inappropriate medication use or patient harm. Medication errors include inaccurate prescribing, administration of the wrong medication, giving the medication using the wrong route or time interval. Administering extra doses, and/or failing to administer medications. Preventing medication errors is essential. Professional standards such as the scope of nursing and standards of practice apply to the activity of medication administration.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents diagnosed with a mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty received appropriate treatment and services to attain and maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial wellbeing for one (#2) of three residents reviewed out of five sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure services and individualized care approaches were provided, and monitored with ongoing assessment, for Resident #2 in order to meet the emotional and psychosocial needs of the resident. Findings include: I. Resident #2 A. Resident status Resident #2, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and discharged to another long-term care facility on 2/13/25. According to the February 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included anxiety, head injury, dementia, depression and epilepsy. The 12/27/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairments with a brief interview for mental status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to establish a system of records and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation and failed to determine that drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled substances is maintained and periodically reconciled. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Maintain a system of controlled substance records for discontinued controlled substances. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Controlled Substance policy, revised November 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/5/24 at 10:56 a.m. The policy read in pertinent part, The facility complies with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of controlled medications. Dispensing and reconciling controlled substances: -Controlled substance inventory is monitored and reconciled to identify loss or potential diversion in a manner that minimizes the time between loss/diversion and detection/follow-up. -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for one (#11) of three residents reviewed for services to maintain highest practicable quality of life out of 25 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for Resident #11. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Supporting Activities of Daily Living (ADL) policy, revised March 2018, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/5/24 at 5:08 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with elimination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for three (#2, #12 and #7) out of 25 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure the physician's orders for skin and wound care were followed for Residents #2 and #12; and, -Ensure Resident #7 received medication as ordered by the physician. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Wound Care policy, revised October 2010, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/5/25 at 5:08 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: The type of wound care given, the date and time the wound care was given, the position in which the resident was placed, the name and title of the individual performing the wound care, all assessment data (wound bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of infectious diseases. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed proper infection control procedures for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Findings include: I. Professional reference The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) (4/2/24), was retrieved on 9/9/24 from https://www.cdc.gov/long-term-care-facilities/hcp/prevent-mdro/PPE.html. It read in pertinent part, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. EBP may be indicated (when contact precautions do not otherwise apply) for residents with wounds…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide services according to professional standards of practice for one (#1) out of three sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to monitor Resident #1, who had a change of condition after suspected illicit drug use. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Acute Condition Changes policy, revised March 2018, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/5/24 at 2:59 p.m. The policy documented in pertinent part, The physician will help the staff monitor a resident with a recent acute changes of condition until the problem or condition resolved or stabilized. II. Resident #1 Resident #1, less than age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the February 2024 computerized physician order (CPO), diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, epilepsy (seizures), acute respiratory failure, bipolar disorder, anxiety and stimulant use. The 1/1/24 minimum data set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observations and record review, ensure residents consistently receive food prepared by methods that conserved nutritive value, palatable in taste, texture, appearance and temperature. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure resident food was palatable in taste, temperature, texture and appearance; and, -Address resident food complaints. I. Facility policy and procedure The Food and Nutritional Services policy, revised September 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator on 11/16/23 at 4:34 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident. II. Resident and resident representative interviews All residents were identified by facility and assessment as interviewable. Resident #29 was interviewed on 11/13/23 at 9:49 a.m. He said we still had a long wait for food and it was cold when I get it. Resident #2 was interviewed on 11/13/23 at 10:07 a.m., Resident #2 said,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions in one kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Foods of modified consistency were reheated to safe temperatures following the use of a multi-step preparation process; -Cutting boards were free from deep scratches and stains; -Follow accepted hand hygiene practices during meal preparation; and, -Kitchen and food service areas were kept clean Findings include: Facility policy The Food Preparation and Service policy, revised November 2022, was provided by the corporate numse consultant (CNC)on 11/16/23 at 3:45 p.m. It read in pertinent part: Food and nutrition services employees prepare, distribute and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. I. Food temperatures A. Professional reference According to the United States Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2022 Food Code, current as of 11/7/23 retrieved 11/22/23 from https://www.fda.gov/food/fda-food-code/food-code-2022…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY III. Water testing failure A. Professional reference According to CDC, Legionella (Legionnaires 'Disease and Pontiac fever), last reviewed 3/25/21, retrieved from on 11/28/23: https://www.cdc.gov/legionella/wmp/toolkit/index.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Flegionella%2Fmaintenance%2Fwmp-toolkit.html and https://www.cdc.gov/legionella/wmp/overview.html. It read in pertinent part, Many buildings need a water management program to reduce the risk for Legionella growing and spreading within their water system and devices. Legionella bacteria are typically found naturally in [NAME] environments, but can become a health concern when they grow and spread in human-made water systems. Legionella can cause a serious type of pneumonia (lung infection) known as Legionnaires ' disease. Some water systems in buildings have a higher risk for Legionella growth and spread than others. Legionella water management programs are now an industry standard for many buildings in the United States. Legionella bacteria can…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a backflow prevention device was installed on the hand held shower hose in room [ROOM NUMBER], #1308 and the shower room on 1400 hall, increasing the risk of contamination to the facility's main water supply. Findings include: I. Backflow prevention devices A. Professional references According to the Environmental Protection Agency's Distribution System Water Quality Protecting Water Quality through Cross-Connection Control and Backflow Prevention, October 2021 rerieved on line 11/22/23 from: https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2021-12/ds-toolbox-fact-sheets_ccc.pdf, it read in pertinent part, Cross-connections are actual or potential connections between a potable water supply and non-potable water plumbing. Backflow is the unintended reversal of water flow through a cross-connection, which can result in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity for five (#29, #35, #45, 85 and #329) of six reviewed out of 54 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure residents were treated with dignity when staff failed to respond timely to call lights for Residents (#29, #35, #45, #85, #329); -Ensure staff provided a structured daily routine when possible for dementia care; and, -Ensure an adequate system was in place to provide meal services in a timely fashion to residents waiting to be served their meals. Findings include: I. Facility policies and procedures The Resident Rights policy, dated December 2016, was requested and received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/15/23 and read in pertinent part: Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident ' s right to: -A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment for residents, in 22 of 105 resident rooms in six hallways. Specifically, the facility failed to -Ensure heating units in resident rooms and in common resident shared areas were in good repair; and, -Ensure that the walls, baseboards, ceilings, counters, and doors in resident rooms and common resident areas were properly maintained. Findings include: I. Observations Observations of the resident living environment were conducted on 11/15/23 at 9:11 a.m. revealed: The heater in the main hallway had an area approximately five feet long by 14 inches high with an unfinished sheetrock patch area with several large copper pipes exposed and coming out of the side of the heater. A second heater in the main hallway had the same damage and unfinished sheetrock; the copper pipes were covered. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The wall next to the resident ' s bed had deep scratches approximately seven feet long by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that all residents were free from abuse, neglect, and exploitation, for seven out of nine incidents of abuse involving 11 residents (#99, #27, #19 #230, #98, #61, #4, #78, #24, #79 and #60) out of 54 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure that Resident #27, Resident #19 and Resident #230 on the Columbine unit were not subject to physically abusive behavior by Resident #99; -Ensure Resident #99, who had a history of dementia and physical aggression towards other residents, received adequate supervision and implementation of effective personalized interventions to prevent the resident from abuse other vulnerable residents; -Ensure abuse prevention and protection interventions for Resident #27 and #19 were assessed, documented and implemented: and, -Ensure that Resident #99 ' s care plan focus for physically aggressive behaviors and interventions to protect other residents from being victimized and abused was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who displayed or was diagnosed with dementia, received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for five (#90, #83, #42, #79, and #85) of 6 out of 51 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to consistently provide person-centered approaches to Residents #90, #83, #42, and #79, who had diagnoses of dementia, involved in resident to resident altercations on the secured unit (cross-reference F600 for abuse). Findings include: I. Memory support unit activities programming The memory support unit activities calendar for 11/13/23 through 11/14/23 revealed the scheduled activities for those days included: 11/13/23 Activities programming schedule 8:45 a.m. daily chronicles 9:00 a.m. verse of the day 11/14/23 Activities programming schedule 1:00 p.m. bowling 1:00 group manicures -However, none of the scheduled activities occurred.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to assist one (#38) of two residents reviewed for preferences out of 54 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff provided assistance and encouragement for the resident (#38) to treat the edema in both of his lower legs; -Ensure the resident could comfortably elevate his legs while in his bed and in his room; -Ensure resident was treated with kindness, respect and dignity when he practiced self advocacy to alter his environment to meet his needs; and, -Ensure the resident ' s care plan was updated timely to reflect the Resident #38 ' s unique needs and preferences within his environment that facilitated the treatment of the edema in his legs. Findings include: I. Facility policy A. The Statement of Resident Rights, undated, included with each admission packet was received on 11/15/23 by the nursing home administrator (NHA). The document read in pertinent part: You have the right to be informed on, and participate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to investigate one allegation of resident to resident altercation physical abuse for two (#29, and #99) of five residents reviewed for abuse of 54 sample residents. Findings include: I. Facility Policy The Abuse Prevention and Reporting Guideline, dated 12/31/15, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/15/23 at 3:54 p.m. It read in pertinent part: Each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. Residents will be free from verbal abuse, physical abuse, mental abuse, sexual abuse, and involuntary seclusion. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other resident consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardians, friend, or other individuals. To ensure the resident ' s rights are protected by providing a method for prevention,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to complete and transmit encoded, accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) data to the CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) system for one (#58) of three out of 54 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to complete MDS Discharge assessment upon Resident #58 ' s discharge from the facility to the community. Findings included: I. Facility policy The Resident Assessment policy, revised in March 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/15/23 at 11:30 a.m. The policy read in pertinent part: A comprehensive assessment of every resident ' s needs is made at intervals designated by OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) and PPS (prospective payment system) requirements. OBRA-Required Assessments - are federally mandated, and therefore, must be performed for all residents of Medicare and/or Medicaid certified nursing homes. The resident assessment coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the interdisciplinary team…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure activities designed to support residents' physical, mental and psychosocial well-being were provided for one (#51) of four residents reviewed for meaningful activity programming activities out of 54 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Resident #51 received individualized meaningful activities to meet her social, emotional and recreational needs; -Resident #58 was consistently offered her eyeglasses so she could see fine details and possibly participate in preferred independent activities; and, -Review with Resident #58 her activity preferences and update the resident ' s changes in activity preferences on a quarterly basis. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activities Program policy, revised August 2006, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/14/23 at 3:30 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part: Our activity programs are designed to encourage maximum individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for one (#186) of three residents reviewed for falls of 54 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement fall prevention care planned interventions for resident #186 who experienced several recent falls. Findings included: I. Facility policy Assessing falls and their causes, dated March 2018, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/15/23 at 3:54 p.m. It read in pertinent part:The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for assessing a resident after a fall to assist staff in identifying causes of the fall. II. Resident #186 A. Resident status Resident #186, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the November 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included quadriplegia, dysphagia, anoxic brain injury, anxiety, and depression, According to the 11/6/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, the resident has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper respiratory treatment and care for two (#185, and #2) of four residents reviewed for supplemental oxygen use out of 54 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to administer oxygen therapy at the appropriate rate/ liter flow in accordance with the physician's order for Residents #185 and #2. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Oxygen Administration Policy revised 4/14/23, was provided on 10/25/23 at 1:55 p.m. by the nursing home administrator (NHA). It read in pertinent part, Oxygen is administered and stored to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, comprehensive person centered care plans, and the resident ' s goal and preferences. II. Resident #185 A. Resident status Resident #185, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the November 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included end stage renal disease, diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences, for one (#66) of two residents ' reviewed for dialysis out of 54 sample residents. Specifically, the facility: -Failed to ensure communication between the dialysis center and the facility; -Failed to have a physician's order for dialysis treatment or orders to assess the shunt site for thrill and bruit (for blood flow); -Failed to consistently assess the shunt site for thrill/bruit and the resident post dialysis; and, -Failed to have an individualized person-centered dialysis care plan. Findings included: I. Facility policy A request was made for the facility dialysis policy on 11/16/23 at 5:40 p.m., The dialysis policy was not provided at time of exit on 11/16/23. II. Resident #66 A. Resident status Resident #66, under the age [AGE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide food that accommodated resident allergies, intolerances and preferences for three (#87, #84 and #53) of three residents out of 54 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #87 received an accommodation for a food allergy and food intolerance by receiving her preferred beverage for her morning cereal and coffee; -Ensure Resident #84 received his preferred side of brown sugar with his morning oatmeal; and, -Ensured that Resident #53 received his preferred breakfast meal. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Food Allergies and Intolerances policy, revised August 2017, was provided by the corporate nurse consultant (CNC) on 11/16/23 at 3:45 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part: Residents with food allergies and/or intolerances are identified upon admission and offered food substitutions of similar appeal and nutritional value. Steps are taken to prevent resident exposure to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure each resident received their meals, at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community or in accordance with resident needs, preferences, requests, and plan of care. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the residents did not have prolonged wait times of 30 minutes or longer for their meal to be served; and that meals were served to the residents at the regular posted meal times. Findings included: I Facility policy and procedure The Food and Preparation policy and procedure, no date, provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/16/23 at 4:14 p.m., read in pertinent part: Food and nutrition services employees prepare, distribute and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food and handling practices. II. Posted mealtimes The posted meal times for the main dining room were scheduled to begin breakfast at 7:15 a.m., lunch at 11:15 a.m. and dinner at 4:45 p.m. III. Resident interviews Resident #29 was interviewed on 11/13/23 at 9:49 a.m. He said we still have a long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the hospice services provided meet professional standards and principles that applied to individuals providing services in the facility for one (#185) of three residents reviewed for hospice services out of 54 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Have a written plan of care for Resident #185, including both the most recent hospice plan of care and a description of the services furnished by the long-term care (LTC) facility; and -Ensure that facility staff provided orientation regarding the policies and procedures of the facility, including patient rights, appropriate forms, and record keeping requirements, to hospice staff who provide resident care in the facility environment. Findings include: I. Facility policy A request was made for the hospice policy on 11/16/23 at 5:40 p.m. The policy was not provided at the time of survey exit on 11/16/23. II. Resident #185 A. Resident status Resident #185, age…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures related to pneumococcal immunizations for one (#43) of five residents reviewed for immunizations out of 54 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to offer and provide the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and or pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) to Resident #43. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Recommended Immunization Schedule for Adults Aged 19 Years or Older, United States, 2024, retrieved on 11/15/23, from: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/adult/adult-combined-schedule.pdf, The document read in pertinent part: Routine vaccination - pneumococcal: -For those over the age of 65 who meet age requirement and lack documentation of vaccination, or lack evidence of past infection was: One (1) dose PCV15 followed by PPSV23 or one (1) dose PCV20. For guidance for patients who have already received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure care for residents was provided in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced the residents' dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an adequate system was in place to provide meal services in a timely fashion to residents waiting to be served in the dining room. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Food and Preparation policy and procedure, no date, provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/27/23 at 4:14 p.m., it read in pertinent part: Food and nutrition services employees prepare, distribute and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food and handling practices. II. Meals served timely A. Posted mealtimes The posted meal times for the main dining room were scheduled to begin breakfast at 7:15 a.m., lunch at 11:15 a.m. and dinner at 4:45 p.m. B. Resident observations and interviews On 9/20/23 at 10:34 a.m., Resident #18 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for two (#30 and #11) of four residents reviewed of 30 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure scheduled medications were given to Resident #9, #10, #11 and #12 in a timely manner. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Administration Medication policy, revised April 2019, provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/27/23 at 4:14 p.m., it read in pertinent part: Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. II. Resident #9 A. Resident status Resident #9, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the September 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included essential hypertension, delusional disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder, congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. According to the 6/25/23 minimum data set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) receives the necessary services and assistance during showers and baths for three (#2, #8 and #3) of three residents reviewed for hygiene assistance of 30 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide scheduled showers and baths or offer an alternative for Resident #2, #8 and #3. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Activities of daily living (ADLs) policy, reviewed March 2018, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/27/23 at 4:14 p.m. The policy read in part, Residents would be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. II. Resident #2 A.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure the residents receive the care and services they required in keeping with their comprehensive plans of care, to achieve and maintain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, -Eight interviewable residents (#5, #4, #20, #22, #24, #26, #12 and #3) out of 30 sample residents and two family members said the facility failed to provide sufficient staff which resulted in delayed and/or inadequate care; -Observations made during survey from 9/14/23 to 9/27/23 revealed care and services not being provided timely; and, -Call lights not accessible to residents. Cross-reference citations: -F550 the facility failed to honor residents rights to timely meal service. -F658 the facility failed to provide medications timely. -F677 the facility failed to provide activity of daily living (ADL) for dependent residents. -F686 the facility failed to provide services to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations and record review,ensure residents consistently receive food prepared by methods that conserved nutritive value, palatable in taste, texture, appearance and temperature. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure resident food was palatable in taste, temperature, texture and appearance; and, -Address resident food complaints. I. Facility policy and procedure The Food and Nutritional Services policy, revised September 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator on 9/27/23 at 4:14 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident. II. Resident and representative interviews All residents were identified by facility and assessment as interviewable. Resident #5's power of attorney was interviewed on 9/20/23 at 9:58 a.m. Resident #5's power of attorney (POA) was visiting with Resident #5.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-27 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to the facility failed to ensure drinks and other fluids were provided and consistent with the care plan, preferences and choices. Specifically, the facility failed to consistently offer, encourage and provide fluids for residents in between meals. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Hydration Clinic Protocol policy, revised September 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/27/23 at 4:14 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part: Assessment and Recognition 1. The physician and staff will help define the individual's current hydration status (fluid and electrolyte balance or imbalances). a. The physician will distinguish various types of fluid and electrolyte imbalance (for example, hyponatremia, hypernatremia, pre-renal azotemia) From true dehydration (clinically significant loss of total body water). 2. The staff, with the physician's input, will identify and report to the physician individuals with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#4) of three residents reviewed for pressure injuries received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure injuries out of 30 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent pressure injuries for Resident #4, who was at risk for pressure injuries. Findings include: I. Professional Reference According to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel, Pressure Injury Prevention Points, April 2016, retrieved from: http://www.npuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Pressure-Injury-Prevention-Points-2023.pdf, the following recommendations were identified: -Cleanse the skin promptly after episodes of incontinence. -Reposition weak or immobile individuals in chairs hourly. -Ensure the heels are free from the bed. -Use heel offloading devices or polyurethane foam dressings on individuals at high-risk for heel ulcers. II. Facility policy and procedure The Preventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary ostomy care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for one (#6) of one resident reviewed for ostomy care out of 30 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide routine monitoring of the coloostomy ensuring the coloostomy was not leaking and properly secured to Resident #6. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Colostomy/Ileostomy Care policy, revised October 2019, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/27/23 at 4:14 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part: The purpose of this procedure was to provide guidelines that would aid in preventing exposure of the resident's skin to fecal matter. The policy described the procedures to take when changing an ostomy. According to the policy when changing an ostomy, staff should: Preparation 1. Review the resident's care plan to assess any special…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures related to pneumococcal immunizations for two (#4 and #8) of five residents reviewed for vaccinations of 30 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was educated on refusal of pneumococcal and Resident #8 received pneumococcal immunization. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), reviewed 11/21/22, retrieved on 9/27/23 from ttps://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/infectioncontrol/ltc-facility-guidance.htm. It read, in pertinent part, If possible, all residents should receive inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) annually before influenza season. For persons aged 65 years (or older), the following quadrivalent influenza vaccines are recommended: high-dose IIV, adjuvanted IIV, or recombinant influenza vaccine. If not available, standard-dose IIV may be given. In the majority of seasons, influenza vaccines…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to store and prepare foods under sanitary conditions. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that: 1. Dietary staff properly restrained hair in the kitchen; 2. Raw eggs were stored below ready-to-eat items; 3. Dietary staff washed their hands and used gloves properly; and 4. Items were dated and labelled in the resident nourishment refrigerators and expired items were discarded. Findings included: 1. A review of the 2017 Food and Drug Administration Food Code, section 2-402.11 regarding hair restraints indicated, Food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food. Observations in the kitchen on 07/25/2022 at 9:03 AM revealed Dietary Aide #1 with her hair in a ponytail and a baseball cap on. Hair in the ponytail was not covered. In an interview on 07/25/2022 at 9:10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews with residents and staff, the facility failed to ensure water that was accessible to residents was maintained at safe temperatures at all times in seven of 14 hallways. Findings included: A review of the facility ' s policy, titled, 2.2 Hot Water Temperatures: Inspection revised 06/01/2007, revealed, Policy Hot water temperatures will be tested weekly. Purpose To ensure temperatures are at proper levels. Process . 3. If temperature does not meet state or local regulations, adjust accordingly. A review of an undated document, titled, TELS (The Equipment Lifecycle System) Masters revealed 1. Ensure patient room water temperatures are between 105º and 115º Fahrenheit (or as specified by state requirements). In an interview on 07/25/2022 at 1:11 PM, Resident #14 stated while they didn ' t mind the hot water being hot, they knew the hot water was not at the right temperature. On 07/25/2022 from 2:30 PM to 2:51 PM, the following observations were made when the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve palatable meals to five (Resident #84, Resident #119, Resident #134, Resident #55, and Resident #44) of five residents observed meal service. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Food: Quality and Palatability, revised on 09/2017, revealed, Food will be palatable, attractive and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. 1. A review of Resident #84's admission Record revealed the resident had diagnoses that included colostomy status, gastroesophageal reflux disease, alcohol-induced acute pancreatitis, alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver, and chronic kidney disease. A review of Resident #84's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the resident scored 15 of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #84 was assessed as being independent with eating. A review of Resident #84's care plan, initiated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-28 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to provide residents with meals at regular times consistent with posted mealtimes and resident preferences for 136 of 136 residents who receive meals from the kitchen, and failed to provide snacks for residents who wanted to eat outside of scheduled meal service times. Findings included: 1. A review of facility grievance reports revealed Resident #45 had filed a grievance on 04/20/2022 regarding breakfast trays being served late. The facility response was to educate the certified nurse aides on the importance of timely meal delivery. A review of the facility posted dining times indicated the following mealtimes: Breakfast: 7:30 AM to 9:00 AM Lunch: 11:30 AM to 1:00 PM Dinner: 5:00 PM to 6:30 PM Observation on 07/25/2022 at 9:03 AM revealed dietary staff serving breakfast trays. Staff stated they had just started breakfast service. Observation on 07/25/2022 at 10:24 AM revealed the Assistant Dietary Manager (Asst DM)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to update person-centered care plans to reflect changes in interventions for one (Resident #84) of five residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, the facility failed to update the accident/falls care plans with additional interventions after falls occurred for Resident #84. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Person-Centered Care Plan, revised on 07/01/2019, revealed the purpose of a person-centered care plan was To eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the patient . Further review indicated, The care plan must be customized to each individual patient's preferences and needs . A review of Resident #84's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 03/10/2022 and had a medical history to include a diagnosis of repeated falls. A review of Resident #84's care plan, initiated on 03/10/2022, indicated the resident was at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services for one (Resident #55) of one sample resident reviewed for discharge planning. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure transition of care services were provided when Resident #55 requested a transfer to another facility. Findings included: The facility's policy, titled, Discharge Planning Process, revised date of 02/01/2019, indicated The Center must develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the patient's discharge goals, preparation of patients to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable re-admissions. Continued review of the policy revealed Upon admission, all patients will be asked about their discharge goals and anticipated length of stay, and assessed for discharge potential. Discharge planning will begin upon admission and be completed as part of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was not 5% or greater. There were five errors out of 38 opportunities observed for two (Resident #84 and Resident #86) of five residents, which resulted in a medication error rate of 13.16%. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration: Oral, revised on 06/01/2021, revealed staff should verify the medication order on the medication administration record (MAR) with the medication label for the correct patient, drug, dose, route, and time. 1. During a medication administration observation on 07/28/2022 at 7:50 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 prepared medication for Resident #84 to administer orally. The following medications were prepared and/or crushed and given to the resident: - Omeprazole 20 milligrams (mg), one capsule - Buspar 10 mg, one tablet - Lactulose 10 grams (g)/15 milliliter (mL), 30 mL - Simethicone 125 mg chewable, one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$29,224 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $29,224 — penalty dated 2023-11-16
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANTHER MASTER TENANT, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/01/2023 |
| PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/01/2023 |
| SHEPHERD, DAVID | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| TUTTLE, CAMERON | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/01/2023 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/01/2023 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $264K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065147. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.