No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Heights Care & Rehabilitation LLC

3131 S Federal Blvd, Denver, CO 80236 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 110 certified beds · (303) 761-0260 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0740)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$68,159 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $68,159 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-15)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (76%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
3100 S Sheridan Blvd · (303) 742-3179 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3525 W Oxford Ave Unit G-1 · (303) 315-6149 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2960 S Federal Blvd · (303) 783-4850 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3125 S Decatur St · (303) 594-8208 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.0%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.4%8.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.4%13.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.0%11.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.6%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.4%21.2%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.8%20.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.3%1.6%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.0%75.6%79.4%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.761.381.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.931.741.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 6.2–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.881.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.30
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
75.9%
Total nursing turnover
58.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 89.7 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 76% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-06)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for two (#80 and #281) of two residents reviewed for psychosocial well-being out of 44 sample residents. Both residents had expressed suicidal ideations. The facility's failures in response created a situation of immediate jeopardy for serious harm. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #80 received the appropriate level of support and supervision to ensure she did not engage in self-harm after making a suicidal ideation with a plan to self-harm. Resident #80 was admitted with diagnoses of bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder and had a history of suicide attempts. The resident met with the behavioral health practitioner (BHP), the director of nursing (DON), the social services director (SSD), and the operations manager (OM) on 12/12/23 to discuss her psychotropic medications. Resident #80…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-05-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to prevent pressure injuries from occurring and worsening for one (#9) of three residents out of 14 sample residents. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease. On 2/29/24, Resident #9 was identified to have developed a stage 3 pressure ulcer to his left heel. Record review and interviews revealed the facility failed to identify the skin breakdown on the comprehensive care plan and identify and implement person-centered interventions to prevent the worsening of the pressure injury to the left heel. Additionally, the facility failed to implement interventions ordered by the wound care physician (WCP). Due to the facility's failures to implement interventions recommended by the WCP, Resident #9's stage 3 pressure wound to the left heel worsened. Findings include: I.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-01-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to have an effective system to identify deviations in performance and adverse events, and to develop and implement appropriate quality assurance and performance improvement (QA/QAPI) plans of action to correct quality deficiencies. Specifically, the QAPI program committee failed to identify and address concerns related to suicidal ideations and the prevention of incidents of self-harm that rose to the level of immediate jeopardy. Cross-reference F740. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee policy and procedure, revised January 2018, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/8/24 at 2:00 p.m. It revealed, in pertinent part, Purpose: to evaluate facility quality indicators, identify quality issues, develop corrective action plans and evaluate any action plans for continuous quality improvement. Any concerns, trends or clusters identified should be listed on the QA Concerns List. Document the concern, goal and approaches and interventions to correct the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for one (#2) of three residents reviewed out of 13 sample residents. Resident #2 was admitted to the hospital from his mother's home on 5/8/23 due to alcohol intoxication with vomiting and inability to control his secretions. The resident's blood alcohol level was 257 (0.257), almost four times the legal limit. Resident #2 had a history of alcohol abuse and seizures with alcohol withdrawal. The facility admitted the resident on 5/9/23, less than 24 hours after he was admitted to the hospital highly intoxicated. The facility failed to monitor Resident #2 for withdrawal symptoms including seizures, provide timely treatment for withdrawal symptoms, and provide the resident a nurse call light. The medical director (MD) said a nursing facility was not the appropriate place for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-08-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling catheters received the appropriate care and services according to professional standards for one (#4) of three residents reviewed for catheters of 13 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain physician orders, a diagnosis, urology follow up or document catheter care for Resident #4. The resident had a history of liver transplant and was taking immunocompromising (lowered immune system response to fight infections) medications. Observations revealed the resident's catheter bag was lying on the floor in the hallway under his chair. He suffered repeated urinary tract infections with fever and falls. The resident had been to the emergency room twice in the last two months since his admission in May 2023. He had been diagnosed and treated for urinary tract infection (UTI) both times. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure: -Resident #4's catheter was cared for with an aseptic technique; and, -Ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure appropriate use of gloves when handling ready-to-eat foods. Findings include:I. Professional referenceThe Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, revised 3/16/24, was retrieved on 4/7/26. It revealed in pertinent part, Food employees may not contact exposed ready-to-eat food with their bare hands and shall use suitable utensils such as deli tissue, spatulas, tongs, single-use gloves, or dispensing equipment. (3-301-11) Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms, including surrogate prosthetic devices for hands or arms for at least 20 seconds, using a cleaning compound in a handwashing sink that is equipped to provide water at a temperature of at least 29.4oC (85oF) through a mixing valve or combination faucet.(2-301-12)II. ObservationsDuring a continuous observation of the dinner meal service on 4/1/26, beginning at 4:25 p.m. and ending at 5:55 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-06 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received food and fluids prepared in a form designed to meet his or her needs per speech therapy recommendation, physician orders and the residents care plan.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure soft and bite size chicken was produced and serviced according to the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) standards. Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to the IDDSI reference (July 2019), retrieved on 4/14/26, https://www.iddsi.org/images/Publications-Resources/DetailedDefnTestMethods/English/V2DetailedDefnEnglish31july2019.pdf Can be eaten with a fork, spoon or chopsticks. Can be mashed/broken down with pressure from fork, spoon or chopsticks. A knife is not required to cut this food, but may be used to help load a fork or spoon. Soft, tender and moist throughout but with no separate thin liquid. Chewing is required before swallowing. Bite-sized pieces as appropriate for size and oral processing skills. Adults no larger than 1.5 centimeters (cm).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection on one of four units. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure housekeeping staff followed appropriate infection control procedures when cleaning and disinfecting residents' rooms and high frequency touched areas (call lights, door handles, light switches and bed controls);-Ensure housekeeping staff followed disinfectant dwell times (amount of time required to ensure germs are eliminated) when cleaning residents' rooms;-Ensure housekeeping staff performed appropriate hand hygiene between glove changes; and,-Ensure Resident #6's catheter tubing was not touching the floor.Findings include: I. Housekeeping failures A. Professional reference Assadian O, Harbarth S, Vos M, et al. Practical Recommendations for Routine Cleaning and Disinfection Procedures in Healthcare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided prompt efforts by the facility to resolve grievances for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for grievances out of 53 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to report, document and follow-up on grievances reported by Resident #1 concerning her care preferences.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Grievances policy, revised April 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/7/26 at 4:24 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or the agency designated to hear grievances. The administrator and staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances to the satisfaction of the resident and/or representative.Any resident, family member, or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning care, treatment, behavior of other residents, or any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary care and services out of 53 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to utilize language communication tools to support effective interaction for Resident #1 during care. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Non-Discrimination-Effective Communication and Modification for Disabilities policy and procedure, dated 1/1/26, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/7/26 at 4:24 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to take reasonable steps to ensure that individuals with disabilities are not discriminated against and provided with the appropriate services to enhance communication.The facility must ensure that its health programs and activities provided through information and communication technology are accessible to individuals with disabilities, unless doing so…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#24 and #80) of seven residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice out of 53 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure physician's orders for wound care were followed for Resident #24; and,-Ensure Resident #80 was consistently administered pain medication per physician's orders.Findings include:I. Failed to ensure physician's orders for wound care were followed for Resident #24 A. Facility policy and procedureThe Wound Treatment Management policy, revised 4/7/26, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/7/26 at 4:24 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, To promote wound healing of various types of wounds, it is the policy of this facility to provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders. Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not greater than five percent (%).Specifically, the facility had a medication error rate of 7.41%, which was two errors out of 27 opportunities.Findings include:I. Professional reference According to [NAME], P.A., [NAME], A.G., et.al., Fundamentals of Nursing, 10 ed., E.[NAME], St. Louis Missouri, pp. 606-607, Take appropriate actions to ensure the patient receives medication as prescribed and within the times prescribed and in the appropriate environment . Professional Standards such as nursing scope and standards of practice apply to the activity of medication administration . To prevent medication errors, follow the seven rights of medication administration consistently every time you administer medications. Many medication errors can be linked in some way to an inconsistency in adhering to these seven rights : 1. The right medication2. The right dose3. The right patient4. The right route5. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for one (#43) of four residents out of 53 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #43 was administered an insulin medication per physician's orders.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Medication Administration policy, revised 4/7/26, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/7/26 at 4:24 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Review the medication administration record (MAR) to identify the medication to be administered.Compare the medication source (bubble pack, vial) with the MAR to verify the resident's name, medication name, form, dose, route, and time. Refer to the drug reference material if unfamiliar with the medication, including its mechanism of action or common side effects. Administer the medication within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by the physician. Observe the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of four residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents out of four sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff did not leave Resident #1, who had a history of falls and required maximal assistance with showering, alone in the shower room during her showers.Findings include:I. Resident #1A. Resident statusResident #1, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the October 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included paraplegia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, and pressure ulcer of the left buttocks.The 10/10/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for a mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. She was dependent on staff for toileting and transfers and required substantial to maximum assistance with showering, dressing, and bed mobility. It indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four (#1, #2, #3 and #4) of four residents reviewed for abuse out of four sample residents were free from abuse. Specifically the facility failed to: -Prevent verbal and physical abuse between Resident #2 and Resident #4. -Protect Resident #1 from physical abuse by Resident #2; and, -Protect Resident #3 from physical abuse by Resident #4. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program policy and procedure, revised 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 5/8/25 at 11:33 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation Reporting and Investigation policy and procedure, revised September 2022, was provided by the NHA on 5/8/25 at 11:33 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Upon receiving any allegations of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents reviewed for abuse were kept free from abuse out of five sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #1 from physical abuse by Resident #2. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy and procedure, revised April 2024, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 7/11/24 at 12:39 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, The nursing home administrator (NHA) is responsible for the overall coordination and implementation of the facility's policies and procedures against abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident's property. Policies are in place that prohibit and prevent resident abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident's property, establish processes to investigate such allegations, implement staff training and coordinate with the quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) committee.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (#8) of three out of 14 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow infection control practices while providing wound care to Resident #8. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to [NAME], P.A., [NAME], A.G., et.al., Fundamentals of Nursing, 10 ed. (2022), Elsevier, St. Louis Missouri, page 1265, retrieved on 5/23/24 Clean away from the wound. Never use the same piece of gauze to clean across an incision or wound twice. II. Resident #8 status Resident #8, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the April 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (disease affecting the central nervous system), stage 4 pressure ulcer of right hip, stage 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for one (#3) out of three out of seven sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration assessment was completed for Resident #3 to perform her own wound care treatments. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Self-Administration of Medications policy and procedure, revised February 2021, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 3/19/24 at 4:33 p.m. It documented, in pertinent part, Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team (IDT) has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. As part of the assessment, the IDT assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is safe and clinically appropriate. If deemed safe and appropriate it is documented in the medical record, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure services provided to two (#3 and #4) of seven sample residents met professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure wound care dressings were dated for Resident #3 and Resident #4. Findings include: I. Resident #4 status Resident #4, under age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the March 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), his diagnoses included cellulitis (skin infection) of the right and left lower legs and open wound to the right and left lower legs. The 2/25/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15. A. Resident interview and observations Resident #4 was interviewed on 3/18/24 at 9:20 a.m. He said the nursing staff were not doing his wound care daily. He said his treatments were being done every couple of days. Resident #4 was observed for wound care on 3/19/24 at 11:00 a.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were observed during wound care for Resident #4 and Resident #3. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy and procedure, revised October 2023, was received from the director of nursing (DON) on 3/19/24 at 4:33 p.m. It documented, in pertinent part, The facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of healthcare-associated infections. Hand hygiene is indicated immediately before touching a resident, before performing an aseptic (sterile) task, after touching a resident, after touching a resident's environment, before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same resident and immediately after glove removal. The use of gloves does not replace hand washing/hand hygiene.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had reasonable access to send and receive mail and packages at the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents' personal mail was delivered timely on all days Monday through Saturday. Findings include: I. Resident group interview and observations The resident group interview was conducted on 1/9/24 at 3:08 p.m., with six (#39, #58, #71, #19, #74 and #69) alert and oriented residents. The residents said they had never received mail on Saturdays at the facility. The residents said they would like to receive their mail on Saturdays. The resident's said the mail would sit over the weekend in the mail box and the receptionist would pick it up on Monday morning when she arrived and then distribute it. II. Record review On 1/9/24 at 4:15 p.m. a poster of resident rights were observed posted on the wall by the entrance to the facility. It documented that the residents had the right to receive mail during the weekdays and weekends. III. Staff interviews The receptionist was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment for the residents on four out of four hallways. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms, bathrooms and shower rooms were odor free and received necessary repairs. Findings include: I. Observations Observations throughout the survey, conducted on 1/8, 1/9, 1/10 and 1/11/24, revealed the following: A. Individual resident rooms 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] had broken blinds; the wall was scraped where the headboard was placed. There was an odor in the bathroom which smelled of urine, the ceiling fan was not working, the floor was dirty and had not been swept and there was missing tile at the base of the floor. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER] had paint chipped walls where the bed was placed. The bathroom had an odor of urine and the ceiling fan was not working. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER] had chipped tile at the entrance of the room. The bathroom ceiling fan was not working. 4. room [ROOM NUMBER] had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to the facility made to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances. Specifically, the facility failed to address and provide resolutions to resident grievances expressed by the resident group and individual residents. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Grievances/Complaints Filing policy and procedure, revised April 2017, was received on 1/11/24 at 2:22 p.m. by the nursing home administrator (NHA). It revealed, in pertinent Residents and their representative have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to the agency designated to hear grievances (the State Ombudsman). The administrator and staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances to the satisfaction of the resident and/or representative. Any resident, family member, or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning care, treatment, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, or any other concerns regarding his or her stay at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#6, #63 and #47) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living were provided with services or treatments to prevent the reduction in range of motion out of 44 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a restorative program was in place for Residents #6, #63 and #47. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedures The Restorative Nursing Services policy, revised July 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/11/24 at 2:00 p.m. The policy revealed residents may be started on a restorative nursing program upon admission, during the course of stay. Restorative goals and objectives are individualized and resident-centered, and are outlined in the resident's plan of care. Restorative goals include but are not limited to supporting and assisting the resident in participating in the development and implementation of the resident's plan of care. II. Resident #6 A. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible for three (#2, #14 and #67) of three residents reviewed for falls out of 44 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #67 had effective fall interventions implemented and that the fall interventions in place were consistently implemented; -Ensure post-fall documentation and interventions were added to Resident #67's care plan; and, -Consistently implement fall interventions for Resident #14 and Resident #2. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Falls and Fall Risk Management Guidelines, dated 2001 and revised in March 2018, was received from the nursing home administrator on 1/11/24. It read in pertinent part: Based on previous evaluations and current data, staff may identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes in the attempt to reduce falls and minimize complications from falling. Fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received food prepared in a form designed to meet their needs. Specifically, the facility failed to provide meals prepared according to the prescribed food orders. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Therapeutic Diets policy, revised October 2017, was received from the nursing home administrator on 1/11/24. It read in pertinent part: Therapeutic diets are prescribed by the Attending Physician to support the resident's treatment and plan of care and in accordance with his or her goals and preferences. If a 'mechanically altered diet' is ordered, the provider will specify the texture modification. The facility was utilizing the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) standards for their residents. The Soft & Bite-Sized IDDSI standard, dated January 2019, was received from the facility on 1/11/24. It read in pertinent part: Soft & Bite-Sized food may be used if you are not able to bite off pieces of food safely but are able to chew bite-sized pieces…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide snacks for residents who ate at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure snacks were consistently available according to resident preferences on the units. Finding include: I. Facility policy The Food and Nutrition Services policy, revised October 2017, was provided by the director or nurses on 1/11/24 at 2:00 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Nourishing snacks are available to the residents 24 hours a day. The resident may request snacks as desired, or snacks may be scheduled. II. Resident group interview The resident group interview was conducted on 1/9/24 at 3:08 p.m., with six alert and oriented residents (#39, #58, #71, #19, #74 and #69) selected by the facility. All six residents said they did not always get snacks. It depended on which staff was working that day. All six residents said that snacks were not offered to them during the day. The group said snacks were passed out to everyone in the evening after dinner between 7:30 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure residents received hand hygiene prior to meals; and, -Ensure residents' items were labeled and stored appropriately in shared rooms. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Infection Control policy and procedure, revised October 2018, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/10/24. It read in pertinent part: The facility's infection control policies and practices apply equally to all personnel and the general public. The objectives of our infection control policies and practices are to: -prevent, detect, investigate and control infections in the facility; -maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment for personnel and the general public; and, -provide guidelines for the safe cleaning and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure in-service training for certified nurse aides (CNA) consisted of at least 12 hours of annual training, including continuing competence. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure CNAs had completed competencies prior to providing skilled services for five out of five CNAs. Findings include: I. Record review The employee files for CNA #7, CNA #8, CNA #9, CNA #10 and CNA #11 were requested on 1/10/23 at 3:26 p.m. The employee files provided by the nursing home administrator did not contain documentation of the demonstration of knowledge that was assessed and evaluated as part of a training, lecture or in service for staff. II. Staff interviews The nursing home administrator (NHA) was interviewed on 1/10/24 at 4:00 p.m. He said he would work on getting the requested information. -The facility was not able to provide the requested information before the exit of the survey 11/11/24.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure consent was obtained for the use of psychotropic medications for one (#180) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication of out 44 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain consent for psychotropic medications from Resident #180 prior to the use of a psychotropic medication for Resident #180. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Antipsychotic Medication Use policy, revised in July 2022, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/11/24 at 2:00 p.m. It read in pertinent part: Residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective. Residents who are admitted from the community or transferred from a hospital and who are already receiving antipsychotic medications will be evaluated for the appropriateness and indications for use. The interdisciplinary team will complete PASRR screening (preadmission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notification of room change for one (#54) out of one out of 44 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #54 and his family with written notification upon moving the resident to another room. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Room Change/Roommate Assignment policy and procedure was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/11/24 at 2:00 p.m. and read in pertinent part, Changes in room or roommate assignment shall be made when the facility deems it necessary or when the resident requests the change. The facility reserved the right to make the resident room changes when the facility deemed it necessary or when the resident requested the change. Prior to changing a room, all parties involved and their representatives would be given advance notice of such change unless medically necessary or for the safety and well-being of the resident, a resident would be provided with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from abuse for one (#36) of seven residents reviewed for abuse out of 44 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #36 from an altercation with Resident #48. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol policy, revised March 2018, was received from the nursing home administrator on 1/10/24. It read in pertinent part: The physician and staff will help identify risk factors for abuse within the facility; for example, significant numbers of residents/patients with unmanaged problematic behavior; significant injuries in physically dependent individuals; problematic family relationships; issues related to staff knowledge and skill; or performance that might affect resident care. The facility management and staff will institute measures to address the needs of residents and minimize the possibility of abuse and neglect. The physician and staff will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report alleged violations of potential abuse to the State Survey and Certification Agency in accordance with state law for three (#13, #72 and #7) of seven residents reviewed for abuse out of 44 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure an allegation of sexual abuse made by Resident #13 was reported to the State Agency timely; and, -Ensure an incident of verbal aggression by Resident #72 to Resident #7 was reported to the State Agency. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation policies and procedure, revised April 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/10/24 at 1:10 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, The administrator is responsible for the overall coordination and implementation of our facility's policies and procedures against abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The management and staff, with physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for two (#72 and #7) of seven residents reviewed for abuse of 44 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an investigation was conducted for a resident to resident incident between Resident #72 and Resident #7 on 12/20/23. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation policies and procedure, revised April 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/10/24 at 1:10 p.m. It read, in pertinent part, the staff, with physician input as needed, will investigate alleged abuse and neglect to clarify what happened and identify possible causes. II. Incident between Resident #7 and Resident #72 A. Resident #7 1. Resident status Resident #7 age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the January 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnosis included major depressive disorder. The 12/11/23 minimum data set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to permit two (#80 and #281) of two out of 44 sample residents to return to the facility following a facility initiated transfer. Specifically, the facility failed to readmit Resident #80 and Resident #281 to the facility following a facility initiated transfer. The facility failed to provide the residents with an involuntary discharge notice prior to or after the transfer and did not permit the residents to be readmitted to the facility. Cross-reference F740: The facility failed to ensure residents received the proper care and services to maintain highest psychosocial well-being. The facility failed to ensure residents were protected by identifying and implementing safety interventions with residents who voiced they were suicidal, ensuring lethality assessments were completed upon suicidal ideations; ensure timely referrals to behavioral health and ensure a person-centered comprehensive care plan was developed to address the residents' suicidal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision abilities for two (#66 and #2) of three residents reviewed for visual problems out of 44 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Resident #66 had an eye exam; and, -Resident #2 was provided and encouraged to wear her glasses. Finding include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Hearing and Vision Services policy, dated 2023, was provided by the director of nurses (DON) on 1/11/24 at 9:43 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all residents have access to hearing and vision services and receive adaptive equipment as indicated. The facility will utilize the comprehensive assessment process for identifying and assessing a resident's vision and hearing abilities in order to provide person-centered care. This process includes: -Obtaining history from medical records, the family, and the resident regarding hearing and vision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received person-centered dementia care that met their needs for two (#2 and #72) of three residents reviewed for dementia care out of 44 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Develop and implement individualized interventions for Resident #2 and Resident #72, who had a dementia diagnosis; and, -Provide meaningful activities that promoted Resident #2 and Resident #72's interests and preferences. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Dementia-Clinical Protocol, revised November 2018, was received from the nursing home administrator on 1/11/24. It read in pertinent part: For the individual with confirmed dementia, the IDT (interdisciplinary team) will identify a resident-centered care plan to maximize remaining function and quality of life. Nursing assistants will receive initial training in the care of residents with dementia and related behaviors. In-services will be conducted at least…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents maintained adequate hydration for one (#2) out of one resident reviewed for hydration out of 44 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to encourage fluid intake for Resident #2. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Hydration-Clinical Protocol, revised 2017, was received from the nursing home administrator on 1/11/24. It read in pertinent part: The physician and staff will identify significant risk for subsequent fluid and electrolyte imbalance; for example, individuals with prolonged vomiting, diarrhea, or fever, or who are taking diuretics and/or ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors and who are not eating or drinking well. The staff will provide supportive measures such as supplemental fluids and adjusting environmental temperature, where indicated. The physician and staff will monitor for the subsequent development, progression, or resolution of fluid and electrolyte imbalance in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to designate a registered nurse (RN) to serve as the director of nursing (DON) on a full time basis. Specifically, the facility utilized the nurse home administrator (NHA) to also serve as the DON and she was unable to work full time hours as the DON. Findings include: I. Record review Review of the staffing list demonstrated that the full time position of DON was filled by the same person as full time NHA. II. Staff interviews The assistant director of nursing (ADON) was interviewed on 10/18/23 at 12:15 p.m. She said the current director of nursing was the same person as the administrator. She said she shared the responsibilities with the DON and followed her direction on what needed to be done. She said the NHA who was filling in as the DON was present in the building daily and she was always available for assistance and questions. Registered nurse (RN) #1 was interviewed on 10/19/23 at 2:30 p.m. She said she knew who was the DON in the building. She said DON was always available for support. Licensed practical nurse (LPN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. Specifically, the facility failed to employ a qualified activities director in order to provide a program of activities for residents requiring activity and recreational support. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the National Certification Council of Activity Professionals (NCCAP) at www.nccap.org, an activity director must meet specific qualifications in education, certification and/or experience. The qualifications read in part: The activities program must be directed by a qualified professional who is a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist; or an activities professional who is licensed or registered, if applicable, by the State in which practicing; and -Eligible for certification as a therapeutic recreation specialist or as an activities professional by a recognized accrediting body; or -Has two (2) years of experience in a social or recreational program within the last 5 years, one of which was full-time in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited mobility receives appropriate services, equipment and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for three (#15, #9 and #8) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living out of 16 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide restorative care services to Resident #15, #9 and #8 on a regular basis, recommended by physical or occupational therapy. Findings include: I. Resident #15 A. Resident status Resident #15, age under 65, was admitted to the facility 7/7/23. According to the October 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included cerebral palsy, epilepsy, chronic pain syndrome, muscle weakness, reduced mobility and muscle spasm. The 10/12/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15. She had no behavioral problems, psychosis or rejection of care. She required extensive assistance of two people with bed mobility, transfers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-16 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine and identify what resources were necessary to care for its residents appropriately during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a facility assessment to include an evaluation of diseases, acuity of the population and the training and competency required by staff to care for the resident population. Cross-reference F684, quality of care for failure to identify education, training and other resources needed to care for a resident who had an acute alcohol withdrawal. Findings include: I. Record review and interviews The facility's assessment was requested from the operations manager (OP) on 8/16/23 at 9:11 a m. The facility's assessment was requested again on 8/16/23 at 1:17 p.m. from the OP. The OM was interviewed on 8/16/23 at 10:38 a.m The OM said the facility was acquired by a new owner on 3/1/23. The OP said he started at the facility in April 2023. He said he was not the licensed nursing home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene in the dining room when serving and assisting residents to eat; and, -Ensure residents were offered hand hygiene before meals. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedures The Standard Precautions policy, revised September 2022 was received from the operations manager (OM) on 8/16/23 at 3:27 p.m. The policy documented in pertinent part, Personnel assist the residents with hand hygiene before meals, after toileting and when indicated. Hand hygiene refers to handwashing with soap (anti-microbial or non-antimicrobial) or the use of alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR), which does not require access to water.Hand hygiene is performed with ABHR or soap and water: before and after contact with the resident; before performing an aseptic task; before moving from work on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and or there representatives were provided prompt efforts by the facility to resolve grievances for two (#1 and #2) of three residents reviewed out of 13 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #1's representative received follow up regarding grievances for lack of oxygen for Resident #1 and a refund of the residents funds after his death; and, -Ensure Resident #2 and his representative received follow up regarding grievances related to his call light not being answered timely and delay in medications. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Grievances, Complaints, Recording and Investigating policy, dated April 2017, was received from the operations manager (OM) on 8/16/23 at 3:27 p.m. The policy documented in pertinent part, Upon receiving a grievance and complaint report, the grievance officer will begin an investigation into the allegations. The department director(s) of any named…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards and risks as possible for one (#6) of three residents reviewed for accidents/hazards out of 13 sample residents. Specifically the facility failed to: -Investigate the root cause and implement interventions for Resident #6's 12 falls in less than two months; and, -Document neurological checks for Resident #6 after unwitnessed falls and falls with head injury. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Assessing Falls and Their Causes policy and procedure, revised March 2018, was provided by the operations manager (OM) on 8/16/23 at 3:27 p.m. It read in pertinent part, to provide guidelines for assessing a resident after a fall and to assist staff in identifying causes of the fall. Falls are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among the elderly in nursing homes. Falling may be related to underlying clinical or medical conditions, overall functional decline, medication side effects and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, document review, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 18 sampled residents were free from physical abuse (Residents #2, #24, #48, #69, and #173). Resident #26 displayed physically aggressive/abusive behavior toward residents and staff. The facility failed to modify/revise Resident #26's care plan and implement adequate supervision for the resident to protect other facility residents from abuse. From 04/14/2022 through 09/14/2022, Resident #26 had physically abused (hit/kicked/grabbed/pushed) Residents #2, #24, #48, and #173; and physically abused Resident #69 twice. Findings included: A review of the facility's Abuse Policy revised 05/15/2018 indicated the facility does not condone resident abuse and shall take every precaution possible to prevent resident abuse by anyone, including staff members, other residents, volunteers, and staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardians, resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-16 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide written notice to the resident and the resident's representative(s) of a hospital transfer for three (3) of three (3) residents (Resident #72, Resident #172, and Resident #67) reviewed for hospitalization. Findings included: A policy was requested from the facility, but the facility did not have a policy related to resident transfers. 1. A record review of Resident 72's progress notes indicated that on 08/04/2022 at 4:21 PM, the resident was transferred from the facility to the hospital. In a record review of Resident #72's electronic health record, there was no documentation related to notifying the resident and/or resident representative of the resident's transfer to the hospital. In an interview on 09/14/2022 at 1:48 PM, the Social Service Director (SSD) and Social Service Assistant (SSA) were interviewed together due to the SSD being employed with the facility only two weeks. The SSD stated that when a resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-16 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to provide the resident and/or the resident's representative(s) written noticed of the bed hold policy when a resident was transferred to the hospital for three (3) of three (3) residents (Resident #72, Resident #172, and Resident #67) reviewed for hospitalization. Findings included: A review of the policy Bedhold, developed on 11/04/2013, indicated, The resident and/or responsible party shall be notified of Bedhold policies of the facility. The notification will be provided in writing upon admission and upon transfer for medical leave. 1. A record review of Resident 72's progress notes indicated that on 08/04/2022 at 4:21 PM, the resident was transferred to the hospital. In a record review of Resident #72's electronic health record, there was no documentation related to providing the resident and/or resident representative of the facility's bed hold policy when the resident was transferred to the hospital. In an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, document and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a communication system relayed a call light directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for two (halls 100 and 200) of four halls observed. Findings included: A review of Answering the Call Light, Version 1.2, revised 03/2021 revealed the policy did not indicate any information related to the functionality of the facility call light system. A review of a document Arial Emergency Call & Nurse Call, which was the call light system the facility used, revealed the system had the ability to have Centralized notifications and safety management: Integrated directly with Foresite fall management and WanderGuard BLUE wander management. Arial becomes the only application caregivers need to quickly identify residents who need care. Integrate EHR [electronic health records] systems such as PointClickCare, even and alarm management from motion detectors, smoke detectors, door and window sensors, temperature and humidity monitors and more. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and a review of facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to protect one (Resident #66) of 18 residents' rights to formulate an advanced directive. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #66's advanced directive and/or the Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) was completed and available in the resident's medical record. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy for Advanced Directives, reviewed on [DATE], revealed, 2. If the resident has executed any advanced directive documents, or if he/she executes any such documents while living in the Community, a copy will be requested and placed in the Resident's record. b. If the resident has such documents, and has provided a copy to the Community, the Community will place a copy of the document in the Resident's record so the Community can readily access such documents. Further review of the policy indicated, 5. All MOST forms shall be kept in a binder at the nurses station. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, document review, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate one of three abuse allegations, which involved a resident-to-resident altercation between Resident #26 and Resident #48. Findings included: A review of the facility's Abuse Policy revised on 05/15/2012 revealed In addition to an investigation by the Police Department, the facility conducts an internal investigation. That investigation includes interviewing any staff members, residents, or family members who may have knowledge of the incident. Report the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident, and if the alleged violation is verified appropriate corrective action must be taken. A review of the facility policy titled, Resident to Resident Altercations, (2001 MED PASS Inc. Revised December 2016) revealed, 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive care plan was developed for one (Resident #58) of four residents reviewed for pain management. Specifically, Resident #58 had pain in the left arm and back and required pain medication. The resident's pain evaluation revealed the resident required a pain management care plan; however, the facility failed to develop a care plan to manage Resident #58's pain. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive, Person-Centered, revised March 2022, indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Further review of the policy revealed The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. In an interview on 09/12/2022 at 2:49…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, document review, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to review and revise the plan of care for one (Resident #26) of 18 residents reviewed following resident-to-resident altercations. The facility developed a care plan with interventions to minimize Resident #26's physically aggressive behavior; however, Resident #26 continued to exhibit aggressive/abusive behavior and the facility failed to review/revise Resident #26's to prevent further potential abuse. Resident #26 abused five residents (Residents #2, #24, #48, #69, and #173) from 04/14/2022 through 09/14/2022. Findings included: A review of the facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy revised March 2022 revealed 11. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the resident's conditions change. 12. The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan: a. when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs), received assistance with hygiene, specifically shaving, for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #19) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings included: A review of policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, Version 1.0, dated revised 03/2018, revealed, 2. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). A review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #19 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, and intervertebral disc degeneration. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-01-11 · tag F0582 — widespread
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to inform three (#80, #82 and #57) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices out of 44 sample residents in a timely manner of changes in their services covered by Medicare. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the appeal phone number was written accurately on the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) or identified at all for Resident #80, #82 and #57. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Appeals, (https://www.medicare.gov/Pubs/pdf/11525-Medicare-Appeals.pdf), retrieved on 1/11/24, for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage CMS-10123 documented, in pertinent part, To request an immediate appeal in Colorado, contact the Kepro Beneficiary Helpline at [PHONE NUMBER]. II. Record review The 10/8/23 NOMNC for Resident #80 documented that the resident's skilled services under Medicare would end on 10/18/23. It indicated that the letter was electronically signed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$68,159 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $28,912 — penalty dated 2024-05-15
  • $39,247 — penalty dated 2024-01-11
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-10 for 37 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CENTENNIAL MASTER TENANT, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/10/2023
PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/30/2023
PLACHTA, MICHAELIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/01/2023
KROMMENHOEK, SAMUELIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/18/2024
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/10/2023
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/10/2023
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/10/2023

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$432K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 80%Medicare 2%Other / private 18%

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $432K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$322per resident / day
operating cost
$9,782per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$330per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Colorado
$10,159/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,182/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,584/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065191. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next