Westwood Post Acute
3185 W Arkansas Ave, Denver, CO 80219 · For profit - Corporation · 85 certified beds · (303) 922-1169 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $65,470 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-25)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.7% | 13.4% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.7% | 4.7% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 1.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 8.8% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.2% | 13.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.4% | 11.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.5% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.8% | 21.2% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.0% | 20.0% | 17.1% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 69.0 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (#45) of three residents reviewed out of 29 sample residents. Resident #45 was admitted on [DATE] for long-term care with a diagnosis of bipolar (mental illness), borderline personality disorder, intellectual disability and dysphagia/oropharyngeal phase (difficulty in swallowing due to issues in the part of the throat located behind the mouth). On 3/18/25 Resident #45 had an episode of choking after she grabbed a handful of leftover refried beans and shoved them into her mouth before the staff could stop her and she aspirated. The resident required the Heimlich maneuver (abdominal thrusts used to remove food or particles stuck in the airway) and suctioning. The 4/5/25 physician's order revealed, based on assessments from the speech therapist (ST), Resident #45 required one-on-one supervision during meals, cueing for small bites/sips, slow rate, redirection to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for one (#6) of four residents out of 29 sample residents related to anticoagulants and insulin management. Resident #6 had several significant health conditions requiring close monitoring with personal care services including physician services and nursing assessment with medication and treatment administration to ensure the resident's highest optimal health condition possible. Resident #6 was at high risk for the development of life threatening blood clots that could cause blockages in the heart, lungs and other vital organs potentially shutting the organs down. The facility's nursing staff were to administer physician ordered medication (warfarin) in proper dosages as calculated by the resident physician based on results of regularly assessed lab work. Warferain is a medication that prevents blood clots from forming or growing larger and causing blockages in the blood and blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene for one (#15) of four residents reviewed for ADL care assistance out of 29 sample residents. Resident #15 admitted to the facility for long term care on 2/28/22 with diagnoses of depression, quadriplegia (decreased or no movement of all four limbs), neurogenic bowel (decreased bowel movements), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (decreased bladder movement) and colostomy status (an opening into the colon from the outside of the body). The resident was dependent on staff for all of his ADLs. The resident expressed not getting out of his wheelchair, not bathing or receiving oral hygiene in weeks and not getting assistance with his meals regularly. The resident felt uncomfortable, itchy and his skin was burning due to not being bathed and wearing the same clothes for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-03-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to consistently provide catheter care, treatment and services to minimize the risk of urinary tract infections for two (#15 and #11) of three residents reviewed for catheter care out of 29 sample residents. Resident #15 admitted to the facility for long term care on 2/28/22 with a diagnosis of depression, quadriplegia (decreased or no movement of all four limbs), neurogenic bowel (decreased bowel movements), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (decreased bladder movement) and colostomy status (an opening into the colon from the outside of the body). The facility failed to provide the resident with catheter care per standards of practice, which resulted in Resident #15 being admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and diagnosed with severe sepsis (blood infection) related to a catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). The hospital paperwork documented the CAUTI was related to poor hygiene and catheter care. The hospital paperwork…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#11 and #4) of two residents out of 29 sample residents received the care and services necessary to meet their nutrition needs to maintain their highest level of physical well-being. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility for long term care on 5/17/23 for long term care with diagnoses of quadriplegia (decreased or no control of all four limbs), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (decreased movement of the bladder), hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), type I diabetes mellitus, neurogenic bowel (decreased bowel movement) and anxiety. Upon admission, Resident #11 weighed 188 pounds (lbs) and he reported he preferred to eat vegetarian meals. Resident #11 was started on Glucerna (diabetic nutritional supplement) once a day on 7/20/23. On 7/6/23, Resident #11 weighed 182.4 lbs. Resident #11 had lost 5.6 lbs, which was not considered significant. On 12/13/23, Resident #11 weighed 166.8 lbs. Resident #11 lost 10.6 lbs or 6%…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#272 and #7) residents out of 28 sample residents were free from significant medication errors. Resident #272, was admitted on [DATE] for long term care with a goal to return home. The resident was prescribed medication of Ativan for his anxiety disorder. The facility ran out of the prescribed medications and he missed 18 doses of Ativan across six days from 9/4/23 to 9/9/23. The facility failed to implement effective interventions to prevent the resident from running out of his medications (discovered on 9/4/23) from progressing to the resident experiencing withdrawal symptoms and subsequently being hospitalized on [DATE] (six days after the facility identified the medication was out of stock). In addition, the facility failed to: -Ensure medications were ordered from the pharmacy STAT (urgent or rushed) to prevent missed medication doses for Resident #272; -Ensure nurses were educated on the availability and use of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-25 · tag F0848 — widespreadProvide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility's binding arbitration agreement contained the required components. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure the arbitration agreement presented to residents contained language that provided for the selection of a venue that was convenient to both parties; and, -Provide for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Binding Arbitration Agreement policy, dated November 2023, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/10/25 at 3:00 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Residents (or representatives) are informed of the nature and implications of any proposed binding arbitration agreements so as to make informed decisions on whether to enter into such agreements. Residents (or their representatives) have the right to make informed decisions about the important aspects of their health, welfare and safety. Arbitration agreements provide for the selection of a neutral arbitrator, which is agreed upon by both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective quality assurance program to identify and address facility compliance concerns was implemented, in order to facilitate improvement in the lives of nursing home residents through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life and resident safety. Specifically, the quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to identify and address concerns related to personal funds, survey results, bedholds, re-admissions, PASSAR recommendations, quality of care, activities of daily living, activities, ancillary services, accidents/hazards, respiratory, dialysis, mental/psychosocial concerns, drug regimen, dental, hydration, snacks, arbitration, immunizations, safe and comfortable environment. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan, revised April 2014, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/8/25 at 1:09 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, The facility shall develop, implement and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that personal funds accounts were managed adequately for four (#19, #22, #27 and #42) of 10 residents out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to have Resident #19, Resident #22, Resident #27 and Resident #42 sign a new resident fund management service (RFMS) authorization and agreement form to handle the residents' funds when the facility underwent a name change. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Management of Residents' Personal Funds policy, revised March 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/14/25 at 1:47 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The resident may have the facility hold, safeguard, and manage his or her personal funds. Should the resident elect to have the facility manage his or her personal funds, it is authorized in writing by the resident or the resident's representative, and a copy of such authorization is documented in the resident's medical record. II. Record review The Resident Fund Management Service Authorization and Agreement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the drug regimen of each resident was reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist for four (#9, #13, #16 and #35) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Have a monthly medication review (MMR) completed for Resident #9, Resident #13, Resident #16, and Resident #35; and, -Failed to have licensed pharmacist signature on monthly medication review (MMR). Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Medication Regimen Reviews policy and procedure, revised May 2019, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/14/25 at 1:47 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, The consultant pharmacy reviews the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly. The consultant pharmacist performs a medication regimen review (MMR) for every resident on the facility receiving medications. MMR are done upon admission (or as close to admission as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure drinks, including water and other liquids consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration for six residents (#5, #35, #47, #48, #49 and #53) of six resident out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #5, Resident #35, Resident #47, Resident #48, Resident #49 and Resident #53 consistently had access to water to ensure proper hydration. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to Treas, [NAME], [NAME] (2022) [NAME] Advantage for Basic Nursing (3rd edition) page 939. The amount of water a person required varies according to the environmental humidity and temperature, activity level, age, and metabolic needs. The average adequate intake is about 2.7 liters of water per day for adult women and 3.7 liters for men. II. Resident group interview A group interview was conducted on 4/9/25 at 1:00 p.m. with six alert and oriented residents (#5, #35,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to provide snacks in one of one nourishment rooms for residents who required bedtime snacks and residents who wanted snacks during off hours. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered and provided nourishing snacks in accordance to their needs and preferences. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Offering/Serving Snacks policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/14/25 at 2:55 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, It is the practice of this facility to offer and serve residents with a nourishing snack in accordance with their needs, preferences and requests at bedtime and on a daily basis. Dietary services staff deliver snacks to each nurses' station. The charge nurse is made aware of the delivery of snacks. Intake of snacks is documented in the medical record. The Food and Nutrition Services policy and procedure, revised October 2017, was provided by the NHA on 4/14/25 at 2:55 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Nourshing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide notice of bed hold policy and return for two (#35 and #211) of four residents reviewed for hospital transfers out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #35 and #211 with a written notice of bed hold policy and return when transferred to the hospital to address acute care needs. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Bed Holds and Returns Policy and procedure, revised October 2022, was received by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/14/25. It revealed in pertinent part, Residents and/or representatives are informed (in writing) of the facility and state bed hold policies. All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during a period of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Residents, regardless of payer source, are provided with written notice about these…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed permit a resident to return after a hospitalization or therapeutic leave for one (#212) of three residents out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to reassess Resident #212's status at the time the resident sought to return to the facility after a transfer to the hospital, and did not allow the resident to return to the facility, based upon her status at the time of her transfer to the hospital. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Facility Initiated Transfer or Discharge policy, revised October 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/10/25 at 2:51 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Each resident will be permitted to remain in the facility, and not be transferred or discharged unless the transfer or discharge is necessary for the residents welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in the facility. A resident's declination of treatments is not grounds for discharge, unless the facility is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to incorporate recommendations from the preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) Level II determination and evaluation from the State Mental Health Agency in the case of residents with serious mental illness or a related condition for one (#40) of two residents reviewed for PASRR out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to arrange and incorporate recommendations from the PASRR Level II notice of determination (NOD) for Resident #40. Findings include: I. Resident #40 A. Resident status Resident #40, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the March 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included dementia with mood disturbances, major depressive disorder, traumatic brain injury and schizophrenia. The 3/29/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively impaired with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15. The assessment indicated the resident had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0659 — isolatedProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that services provided or arranged in accordance with the resident's plan of care were delivered by individuals who have the skills, experience and knowledge to do a particular task or activity for one (#20) of three residents out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #20, who had a diagnosis of diabetes, had his fingernails cut by staff who were trained to perform the task. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #20, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the March 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included dementia, diabetes, quadriplegia, contractures of the left and right hands, diabetes and anoxic brain injury. The 3/19/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired with a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of six out of 15. The resident had impairments of both upper extremities and used a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY IV. Resident #20 A. Resident status Resident #20, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the March 2025 CPO, diagnoses included dementia, quadriplegia, contractures of the left and right hands, diabetes and anoxic brain injury. The 3/19/25 MDS assessment revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of six out of 15. The resident had impairments of both upper extremities, used a wheelchair to ambulate and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident was dependent on staff for eating, toileting, personal hygiene, shower, dressing and transfers. B. Resident observation During a continuous observation on 4/7/25, beginning at 11:41 a.m. and ending at 2:49 p.m., the following was observed: At 11:41 a.m. the resident was sitting in his wheelchair in the dining room. At 12:33 p.m. a staff member took the resident from the dining room to a television room. At 1:32 p.m. a staff member took Resident #20 to the activities room for an activity. At 2:49 p.m. the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide one (#30) out of five residents out of 31 residents with an ongoing program of activities designed to meet needs and interests and promote physical, medical and psychosocial well-being. Specifically the facility failed to ensure Resident #30 received a personalized activity program. Findings include: I. Resident #30 A. Resident status Resident #30, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the April 2025 computerized physician ' s orders (CPO), diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance, anxiety and mood disturbance and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. The 1/7/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairments with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of three out of 15. The resident required partial to moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). She required set up assistance for eating. The 1/27/25 MDS assessment revealed it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision abilities for one (#30) of one resident reviewed for vision out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow up on Resident #30's referral for cataract surgery. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Hearing and Vison policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/14/25 at 1:47 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility ensure that all residents have access to hearing and vision services and receive adaptive equipment as indicated. The social worker/social service designee is responsible for assisting residents and their families in location and utilizing any available resources, for the provision of the vision services that the resident needs. Once vision or hearing services have been identified, the social worker will assist the resident by making appointments and arranging for transportation. II. Resident #30 A.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#9) of three residents who required respiratory care received care consistent with professional standards of practice out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow physician's orders to maintain, clean, sanitize and store Resident #19's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask and machine. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The CPAP/BiPAP support policy and procedure, revised March 2015, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/14/25 at 1:47 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, To provide the spontaneously breathing resident with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with or without supplemental oxygen. General guidelines for cleaning the machine: wipe machine down with warm soapy water and rinse at least once a week and as needed. Clean humidifier weekly and air dry. Masks, nasal pillow, and tubing: clean daily by placing in warm water, soapy water and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#112) of one resident reviewed for dialysis care out of 31 sample residents received dialysis services consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the resident's arteriovenous fistula (AVF) shunt was assessed on a daily basis. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Hemodialysis Catheters-Acccess and Care policy, dated February 2023, was received from the nursing home administrator on 4/11/25 at 4:03 p.m. The policy read in pertinent parts, Care of AVFs: -Keep the access site clean at all times; -Check the color and temperature of the fingers and the radial pulse of the access arm when performing routine care at regular intervals; -Check patency of the site at regular intervals. Palpate the site to feel the thrill, or use a stethoscope to hear the whoosh or bruit of blood flow through the access. The nurse should document in the resident's medical record every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors, received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional stands or practice and accounting for the residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for two (#40 and #42) of four residents reviewed out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Identify Resident #40 and Resident #42's history of trauma and identify triggers which may retraumatize them; and, -Ensure services and individualized care approaches were provided for Resident #40 and Resident #42. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Trauma Informed Care and Culturally Competent Care policy, revised August 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/11/25 at 3:53 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Purpose: to guide staff in providing care that is culturally competent and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide one resident (#30) with professional quality of care out of 31 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #30 received timely dental service. Findings include: I. Resident #30 A. Resident status Resident #30, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the April 2025 computerized physician's orders (CPO), diagnoses included dementia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and adult failure to thrive. The 1/27/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairments with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of three out of 15. The resident required assistance with all of her activities of daily living. The MDS assessment was not completed for the resident's dental status. -However, the resident was edentulous. B. Resident #30's representative interview The resident representative was interviewed on 4/10/25 at 1:00 p.m. The resident representative said she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures related to pneumococcal immunizations for one (#30) of five residents reviewed for immunizations out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure consent was obtained from Resident #30's representative prior to administering the pneumococcal vaccination. Findings include: I. Resident #30 A. Resident status Resident #30, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the April 2025 computerized physician's orders (CPO), diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance, anxiety and mood disturbance and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. The 1/7/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairments with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of three out of 15. The resident required partial to moderate assistance with ADLs. The MDS assessment indicated the resident was not up to date on the pneumococcal vaccine because it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, functional and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the residents' shower room was maintained in a safe and sanitary condition. Findings include: I. Observations On 4/8/25 at 2:13 p.m. the facilities shower room was observed. There was black residue on the surface of the grout lines going around the perimeter of the inside of the shower. II. Resident representative Resident #30's representative was interviewed on 4/8/25 at 9:43 a.m. She said the shower room was not clean and needed to have a good cleaning. She said it had been like that for some time. III. Staff interviews and observations The shower room was observed with the maintenance director (MTD) and the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/8/25 at 2:45 p.m. The MTD said the housekeeping staff cleaned the shower daily and deep cleaned the shower once a week. The MTD said the black residue could be soap (however the liquid body soap in the shower room was orange) or it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies, potentially affecting all the residents in the facility. Specifically, the quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to identify and address concerns related to medication errors. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program policy, revised February 2020, was provided by the interim director of nursing (IDON) on 3/7/24 at 2:40 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, The objectives of the QAPI Program are to: Provide a means to measure current and potential indicators for outcomes of care and quality of life. Provide a means to establish and implement performance improvement projects to correct identified negative or problematic indicators. Reinforce and build upon effective systems and processes related to the delivery of quality care and services. Establish systems through which to monitor and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure care for residents was provided timely and in a manner that maintained or enhanced the residents' dignity. Specifically, the facility failed to provide residents with a dignified existence by ensuring that call lights were consistently answered in a timely manner. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response policy, revised February 2023, was received from the corporate nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 2/20/24 at 12:10 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. Call lights will directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response. All staff members who see or hear an activated call light are responsible for responding. If the staff member cannot provide what the resident desires, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt action was taken upon the filing of a grievance of a group. Specifically, the facility failed to follow up with residents' concerns regarding meals, staff cell phone usage, batteries not being charged and trash not being taken out. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Grievances/Complaints, Filing policy, revised April 2017, was provided by corporate nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 2/15/24 at 10:00 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to the agency designated to hear grievances. Any resident, family member, or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complain concerning care, treatment, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, or any other concerns regarding his or her stay at the facility. Grievances also may be voiced or filed regarding care that has not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY IV. Falls A. Facility policy and procedure The Fall Risk Assessment policy, revised March 2018, was provided by CNC #1 on 2/19/24 at 4:30 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The nursing staff, in conjunction with the attending physician, consultant pharmacist, therapy staff, and others will seek to identify and document resident risk factors for falls and establish a resident-centered falls prevention plan based on relevant assessment information. Upon admission, the nursing staff and the physician will review a resident's record for a history of falls, especially falls in the last 90 days and recurrent or periodic bouts of falling over time. The staff, with the support of the attending physician, will evaluate functional and psychological factors that may increase fall risk, including ambulation, mobility, gait, balance, excessive motor activity, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) capabilities, activity tolerance, continence, and cognition. The staff and attending physician will collaborate to identify and address…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure certified nurse aides and licensed nurses were able to demonstrate competency skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs. This placed all residents at the facility at risk of receiving inadequate care. Specifically, the facility failed to conduct staff competency evaluations for all certified nurse aides (CNA), licensed practical nurses (LPN) and registered nurses (RN). Cross-reference F677: failure to provide adequate assistance for activities of daily living for a resident who was dependent on staff for all care. Cross-reference F684: failure to provide diabetic care per standards of care. Cross-reference F689: failure to ensure the needs of a resident with substance use disorder. Cross-reference F690: failure to provide catheter care per standards of care. Cross-reference F691: failure to provide colostomy care per standards of care. Cross-reference F692: failure to implement effective interventions to ensure resident nutrition needs were met. Cross-reference F760: failure to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable and attractive at the appropriate temperatures. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident food was palatable in taste, texture and appearance. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Food and Nutrition Services policy, revised October 2017, was provided by corporate nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 1/19/24 at 4:30 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident. II. Observations A test tray for a regular diet was evaluated by three surveyors immediately after the last resident had been served their room tray for lunch on 2/14/24 at 1:05 p.m. The test tray consisted of a sloppy joe sandwich, a bag of potato chips and coleslaw. -The individual bag of potato chips was set directly on top of the sloppy joe sandwich. -The cole slaw was 48.4 degrees fahrenheit (F). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, safe and homelike environment for two (#19 and #11) of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure a system was implemented to clean and maintain Resident #19's chew and spit discarded food bucket; and, -Maintain a clean room environment for Resident #19 and Resident #11, who were roommates. Findings include: I. Facility policies The Safe and Home Like Environment policy, revised April 2019, was provided by corporate nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 2/20/24 at 12:10 p.m. It read in pertinent part: In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible. This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk. Housekeeping and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#4) of three residents out of 29 sample residents were provided prompt efforts by the facility to resolve grievances. Specifically, the facility failed to provide a resolution to Resident #4's grievance, which he had communicated to staff on multiple occasions, regarding the resident's missing cigarettes and money. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Grievances/Complaints, Filing policy, revised April 2017, was provided by corporate nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 2/15/24 at 10:00 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to the agency designated to hear grievances. Any resident, family member, or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning care, treatment, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, or any other concerns regarding his or her stay at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#4) of three sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide regular and consistent supervised guidance to assist Resident #4 to make educated decisions on determining an appropriate sliding scale insulin dose based on blood glucose assessment and carbohydrate intake and document those efforts per physician's orders. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Diabetes-Clinical Protocol, revised November 2020, was provided by the corporate nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 2/19/24 at 4:30 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The Physician and staff will summarize factors that are contributing to, or conditions that are affected by the residents diabetes or glucose intolerance and will assess the impact of diabetes on the individual's function and quality of life. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who require colostomy services receive such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. for two (#15 and #11) of two residents reviewed for colostomy care out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #15's and Resident #11's colostomy bags were maintained per physician's guidance and professional standards of practice. Findings include: I. Professional reference The American Cancer Society's Caring for a Urostomy (10/16/19), retrieved on 2/27/24 from https://www.cancer.org/cancer/managing-cancer/treatment-types/surgery/ostomies/urostomy/management.html, read in pertinent part, During the day most people need to empty the pouch about as often as they used the bathroom before they had urostomy surgery or other bladder problems-for many people, this might mean every 2 (two) to 4 (four)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed to meet the residents nutritional needs. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Follow correct portion sizes to ensure adequate nutrition was provided to the residents; and, -Follow recipe modifications for the texture modified diets. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Kitchen Weights and Measures policy, revised April 2007, was provided by corporate nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 2/15/24 at 10:00 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Food services staff will be trained in proper use of cooking and serving measurements to maintain portion control. Staff will be trained in the appropriate measurement and type of serving utensil to use for each food. Signs or posters explaining coded measurement indicators (color-coded) on utensils will be prominently displayed for reference. The Therapeutic Diets policy, revised October 2017, was provided by CNC #1 on 2/19/24 at 4:30 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician to support…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident for one (#11) of three residents out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #11's requests and preferences for a vegetarian diet were served to him. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Food Preferences policy, Revised July 2017, was provided by corporate nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 2/19/24 at 4:30 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team. Upon the resident's admission (or within 24 hours after his/her admission the dietitian or nursing staff will identify the resident's food preferences. Nursing staff will document the resident's food and eating preferences in the care plan. If the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of infectious diseases. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Follow aseptic technique when replacing Resident #15's suprapubic catheter; and -Follow aseptic technique when performing Resident #18's wound care. Findings include: I. Suprapubic Catheter insertion procedure for Resident #15 A. Professional references According to [NAME], B.C. 2001, (8/16/21) Nursing Standards, How to Change a Suprapubic Catheter Effectively, retrieved on 2/27/24 from https://journals.rcni.com/nursing-standard/how-to-series/how-to-change-a-suprapubic-catheter-effectively-ns.2021.e11766/abs, A suprapubic catheter is inserted through the lower abdominal wall, above the pubic bone and below the navel, and into the bladder. A suprapubic catheter change is an aseptic procedure that was undertaken to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#32, #41 and #272) of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medications out of 28 sample residents had the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment including the right to be informed, in advance, of the care to be furnished. Specifically the facility failed to ensure Resident #32, #41 and #272 were made aware of the risk/benefit and side effects of prescribed psychotropic medications. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Antipsychotic Medication Use policy, revised July 2022, was provided by the case manager on 9/28/23 at 1:15 p.m. it read in pertinent part, residents and or resident representatives will be informed of the recommendation, risks, benefits, purpose and potential adverse consequences of antipsychotic medication use. Residents and or resident representatives may refuse medications of any kind. Nursing staff shall monitor for and report any side effects and or adverse effects of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide a homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and support for daily living safely in two out of two units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure smoking residents smoked in designated areas; -Ensure non-smoking residents were protected from smoking odors. Findings include: I. Observations Three residents were observed on 9/27/23 at 12:40 p.m. smoking cigarettes under the gazebo in a non-designated area. II. Resident interviews Resident #3 was interviewed on 9/27/23 at 12:15 p.m. She said her room constantly smelled like smoke and it bothered her. She said residents were allowed to smoke in non-designated smoke areas. Resident #37 was interviewed on 9/27/23 at 12:20 p.m. She said the smoke smell always entered her room and it bothered her because the smokers were allowed to smoke in non-designated areas. The smoke that entered her room made it hard for her to breathe at times. Resident #10 was interviewed on 9/27/23 at 11:11 a.m. She said smoke constantly entered her room and she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were properly stored and labeled in two of three medication carts. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled with open dates for insulin (medication used for blood glucose management) pens and vials. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Lantus insulin package insert, retrieved on 10/3/23 from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/021081s076lbl.pdf After Lantus solo star pens have been opened they can be stored at room temperature for up to 28 days. The Lantus solo star pen should be thrown away after 28 days, even if it still has insulin left in it. According to the Humalog insulin package insert, retrieved on 10/4/23 from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/020563s115lbl.pdf In use humalog vials stored at room temperature must be used within 28 days or be discarded. II. Facility policy The Insulin Administration policy and procedure, revised September 2014, was received from the nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. Specifically the facility failed to: -Ensure Insulin (medication used for blood glucose management) pens and vials were properly cleaned prior to drawing up medications; -Ensure wound care was provided in a hygienic manner; and, -Ensure hand hygiene was performed when changing gloves. Findings include: I. Failure to wipe insulin vials and pens appropriately A. Professional reference According to the Lantus Insulin package insert retrieved on 10/4/23 from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/021081s076lbl.pdf wipe the rubber seal of the insulin pen with an alcohol swab before use. Wipe the top of the insulin vial with an alcohol swab prior to drawing up insulin. B. Facility policy and procedure The Insulin Administration policy and procedure, revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2020-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of one kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure the kitchen and food equipment was clean; -Prevent potential contamination; -Ensure proper food temperatures were taken for tray line service. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Food Sanitary and Service policy was requested from the nurse consultant (NC) on 2/27/2020 at 3:14 p.m. The NC said the facility did not have a policy on kitchen sanitation and cleanliness. II. Initial walkthrough The initial walkthrough of the kitchen was conducted on 2/24/2020 at 8:45 a.m. The dishwashing section contained several cooking utensils, plates, cups, and bowls piled up on the counter. The ice machine filters were covered in dust colored brown debris. The two drying fans in the dishwashing room were covered in dust and brown debris. III. Cleanliness The main kitchen was observed on 2/26/2020 at 11:05 a.m. The dish machine room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY III. Appropriate clothing for the weather A. Resident #49 Resident #49, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the January 2020 computerized physician orders (CPOs), diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, anxiety disorder, and nicotine dependence to cigarettes. According to the 12/7/19 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, the resident had minimum cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15. She required supervision for activities of daily living (ADL's) such as dressing that required additional time to complete. The care plan initiated 6/26/18 identified Resident #49 as a safe smoker and capable of smoking without physical assistance but must be supervised. B. Observation 2/25/2020 -At 8:35 a.m., Resident #49 was observed through windows sitting outside in the courtyard, the temperature was 27 degrees with 12 mile per hour wind. Resident #49 wore a lightweight jacket. Resident #49's left arm was not in the jacket, and the jacket was not zipped up. -At 9:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed to prevent the spread of infection. Specifically the facility failed to: -Follow proper hand hygiene with glove use when working between dirty to clean processes. Finding include: I. Hand hygeine A. Facility policy The handwashing / hand hygiene policy revised August 2019 provided by nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/26/2020 at 4:00 p.m., read in pertinent part: by the nursing home administor read in pertinent part: All personnel shall be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare associated infections. The standard precautions policy revised October 2018 provided by NHA on 2/26/2020 at 4:00 p.m., read in pertinent part: Gloves are changed during the care of a resident to prevent cross-contamination from one body site to another (when moving from dirty site to a clean site). B. Observations Certified nurse aide (CNA) #4 was observed on 2/25/2020 at 4:11 p.m. to assist Resident #29 with peri care. He had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the interests of and support the wellbeing of one (#46) out of three residents out of 31 sample residents reviewed. Specifically the facility failed to -Provide a resident centered activity program for Resident #46 Finding include I. Resident status Resident #46, age [AGE], was readmitted on [DATE]. According to the February 2020 computerized physician orders (CPOs), diagnoses included dementia, aphasia, respiratory failure and arthritis. The 1/9/2020 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score was not completed. She required extensive assistance with two persons for bathing, transfers, toileting, dressing and personal hygiene. She required supervision at meals with cueing. Her skin was at risk for breakdown. The MDS activities interview and preference form dated 1/7/2020 provided by the Activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#57) of one out of 31 sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, comprehensive care plan and resident choices. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure proper wheelchair positioning to address improper postioning for Resident #57. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Repositioning Policy, revised May 2013 and provided on 2/27/2020 at 4:00 p.m. by the Nursing consultant (NC) documented the following pertinent information: . 1. Encourage the chair-bound resident, who is able to move, to change positions or shift weight at least every fifteen minutes or as often as possible. 2. Check the care plan, assignment sheet or the communication system to determine resident-specific positioning needs including special equipment; resident level of participation and the number of staff required to complete the procedure. 3. Ask the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the hydration needs were met for one (#46) out of three residents out of 31 total sampled residents reviewed. Finding include: I. Facility policy The hydration policy dated 1/12/16 was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/26/2020 at 4:00 p.m., read in pertinent part: The facility must provide each resident with sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health. Provide at least 1500 milliliters (ml) daily to each resident unless otherwise indicated by assessment with the registered dietitian or medical order. II. Resident's status Resident #46, age [AGE], was readmitted on [DATE]. According to the February 2020 computerized physician orders (CPOs), diagnoses included dementia, aphasia, respiratory failure and arthritis. The 1/9/2020 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score was not completed. She required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#39) of two residents out of 31 sample residents received respiratory treatments in a manner of care consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically the facility failed to: -Follow physician oxygen orders -Clean and store the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) equipment properly Findings include: I. Facility policy The facility oxygen administration policy, revised October 2010 provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/26/2020 at 4:00 p.m., read in pertinent part: The purpose of this is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Verify that there is a physician's order, review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. The CPAP support policy, revised March 2015, read in pertinent part: Masks, nasal pillows and tubing were to be cleaned daily with warm soapy water and soaking/agitating for five minutes. Mild dish detergent was recommended. Rinse with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-04-25 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents, family members and legal representatives had full access to review the results of the facilities most recent survey findings that included the survey results, certifications, complaint investigations and plans of correction in effect for the preceding three years. Specifically the facility failed to provide three years worth of survey and investigation findings in a prominent location for public viewing. Findings include: I. Resident group interview A group interview was conducted on 4/9/25 at 1:00 p.m. with six alert and oriented residents (#5, #35, #47, #48, #49 and #53), per the facility and assessments. The residents said they did not know where the binder containing the survey results was located. II. Observations On 4/10/25 at 10:59 a.m. the facility survey result binder was located behind the receptionist`s desk in the front lobby. The binder was not accessible and it had to be requested from the receptionist. The binder had a note that said to put out when the receptionist was at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$65,470 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $23,959 — penalty dated 2025-04-25
- $29,177 — penalty dated 2024-03-07
- $12,334 — penalty dated 2023-09-28
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-21 for 12 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-05 for 25 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENTENNIAL MASTER TENANT, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/11/2022 |
| PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/30/2023 |
| HORTON, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/20/2023 |
| CONNOR, ANGELA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/12/2024 |
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/11/2022 |
| HANCOCK, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/11/2022 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/11/2022 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $400K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065274. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.