No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Eagle Ridge Post Acute

2425 Teller Ave, Grand Junction, CO 81501 · For profit - Corporation · 70 certified beds · (970) 243-3381 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (970) 243-3381 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2025Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$63,613 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $63,613 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-04)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2121 North Avenue
Pharmacy
515 28 3/4 Rd. Building A · (970) 361-3748 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Gj Mart0.1 mi
2355 Belford Ave · (970) 628-1688 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Lincoln Park, 910 N 12th St · (970) 254-3866 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1333 N 23rd St · (970) 241-7562

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.1%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.6%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.1%8.8%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.5%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.9%13.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.2%11.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.3%94.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.8%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.9%21.2%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.7%20.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication7.4%1.6%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine65.2%75.6%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.501.381.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.911.741.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.7%CMS range 35.1–62.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.2–13.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.0–14.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.65
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.46
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.53
RN hoursweekends
62.7%
Total nursing turnover
91.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 66.6 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-06-12)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2020-02-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#3) of three sample residents, was free from significant medication errors out of 13 sample residents.Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus with a history of experiencing low blood glucose levels. Resident #3 had a physician's order to receive 29 units of Lantus (insulin glargine - long acting insulin) injected subcutaneously each day at bedtime. The resident had another physician's order for Humalog insulin (lispro - short acting insulin) 100 units per milliliters (ml) injected daily at 6:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. On 10/22/25 at 7:33 p.m. registered nurse (RN) #1 administered 29 units of Humalog (quick acting insulin) instead of the scheduled Lantus (long acting insulin), which caused the resident's blood glucose to drop. When RN #1 realized the error, he administered the correct insulin in addition to the insulin he administered in error and then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2025-12-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to serve food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences for one (#1) of five residents reviewed out of five sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not served food the resident was allergic to, causing an allergic reaction to Resident #1 which required hospitalization for anaphylactic shock (a severe, potentially life-threatening allergic reaction that can cause a range of symptoms affecting multiple body systems, including skin, respiratory, and cardiovascular).Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] for long term care with diagnoses of unspecified lack of expected physiological development in childhood, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, lack of coordination and history of anaphylaxis (severe allergic reaction). On 9/24/25 Resident #1 was served tilapia for lunch. Shortly after consuming the fish, Resident #1 developed itching and was having difficulties breathing. Resident #1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2024-06-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#54) of five residents out of 45 sample residents received the care and services necessary to meet their nutrition needs and to maintain their highest level of physical well-being. Resident #54 was admitted to the facility for long term care on 11/10/23 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes and generalized muscle weakness. The resident was initially weighed on 11/19/23 and weighed 149 pounds (lbs). The resident was admitted to the hospital from [DATE] to 1/8/24 for electrolyte imbalances. Upon readmission to the facility the resident weighed 135.2 lbs. On 1/22/24 and 1/29/24 the resident weighed 123.6 lbs. On 2/5/24 the resident weighed 123 lbs. The resident sustained a 26 lbs (17.4%) weight loss in three months and 12.2 lbs (9%) in one month, which was considered severe weight loss. The facility failed to assess the resident and implement nutrition interventions after the resident sustained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2020-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#11) of four residents reviewed of 31 sample residents received timely treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and facility policy. For Resident #11, the facility failed to: -Timely respond, assess, communicate and report to the physician the resident's severe acute pain; -Timely acknowledge, and sign off on, and implement physician orders; -Schedule Resident #11's outpatient ultrasound in a timely manner although the resident was experiencing pain; and -Notify the physician of a change in status and the resident's increased pain. These failures resulted in the resident having a delayed transport to the outpatient imaging center, while the resident was experiencing new acute pain at levels of 7-10 on a scale of 0 out of 10. The facility did not call the imaging center to attempt to schedule Resident #11's ultrasound ordered at 9:40 a.m. by the physician until the next day, and the resident experienced pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-04 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide, implement and maintain an effective training program for new and existing staff. Specifically the facility failed to provide:-All staff the required annual abuse identification, abuse prevention and abuse reporting training, for 75 out of 83 staff; -All staff dementia management training, for 39 out of 83 staff;-All staff resident rights training, for 31 out of 83 staff; -All staff quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) training, for 30 out of 83 staff;-All direct care staff effective communication training, for 49 out of 49 staff; -All staff infection control training, for 20 out of 83 staff members; -All staff compliance and ethics training, for 16 out of 83 staff; and, - All direct care staff behavioral health training, for 13 out of 49 staff. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe In-Service Training policy, revised April 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/4/26 at 1:28 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, All staff must participate in initial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0943 — widespread
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide training to their staff that at a minimum educates staff on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property as set forth, procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of resident property and resident abuse prevention.Specifically the facility failed to provide 75 of 83 staff members annual training on abuse identification, prevention, reporting and evidence gathering. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse policy, revised April 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/4/26 at 1:28 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, The facility's resident abuse, neglect and exploitation prevention program consists of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to support abuse prevention, identification and response. This included Provid[ing] staff orientation and training programs that include topics such as abuse prevention, identification and reporting of abuse, stress management,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY III. Failed to ensure Resident #2's representative was notified when the resident was sent to a cardiology appointment and started on an anticoagulant medication A. Resident status Resident #2, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the June 2025 CPO, diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, other specified diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, presence of cardiac pacemaker, dementia, unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety and unspecified atrial fibrillation. The 4/23/25 MDS assessment identified Resident #2 was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. Resident #2 used a walker for mobility and was independent with most of his activities of living (ADL). B. Resident interview Resident #2 was interviewed on 6/30/25 at 4:40 p.m. Resident #2 said he was placed on a blood thinner medication after he went to his cardiology appointment. He said he let his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#4) of three residents reviewed for abuse out of eight sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #4 from verbal abuse and physical abuse by Resident #5. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating policy, revised September 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/2/25 at 11:10 p.m. via email. The policy read in pertinent part, All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. Upon receiving any allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one ( #1) of three residents were provided the care and services necessary to ensure a safe discharge from the facility to the community out of eight sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Allow Resident #1 to return to the facility after an unplanned discharge to the hospital; -Provide documentation made by Resident #1 ' s physician, including the specific resident needs the facility could not meet, the facility ' s efforts to meet those needs and the specific services the receiving facility would provide to meet the needs of the resident which could not be met at the current facility; and, -Reassess Resident #1 for readmission after he was stabilized at the hospital and ready to return to the facility. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Transfer or Discharge policy, revised March 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/1/25 at 5:10 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, If the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring treatments and services for mental disorders or psychosocial adjustment difficulties received appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well being for one (#1) of three residents reviewed out of eight sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide mental health counseling services for Resident #1. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Behavioral Health Services policy, revised February 2019, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/1/25 at 5:53 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Behavioral health services are provided to residents as needed as part of the interdisciplinary, person-centered approach to care. Residents who exhibit signs of emotional/psychosocial distress receive services and support that address their individual needs and goals for care. II. Resident #1 A. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure prompt action was taken upon the filing of a grievance of a group. Specifically, the facility failed to follow up with residents' concerns regarding call light times. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Grievance/Complaints, Filing policy, revised April 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/11/25 at 5:12 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to the agency designated to hear grievances. The administrator and staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances to the satisfaction of residents and/or representatives. Any resident, family member, or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning care, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, or any other concerns regarding his or her stay at the facility. All grievances, complaints or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect, in full recognition of his or her individuality for one (#1) of five residents reviewed for respect and dignity out of 11 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assist Resident #1, who was dependent on staff for all care, to turn in bed when he requested assistance. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Rights policy, revised December 2016, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 8/22/24 at 11:26 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to self-determination, and to be informed of, and participate in, his or her care planning and treatment. II. Resident #1 A. Resident status Resident #1, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the August 2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#8) of one resident out of 11 sample residents was free of significant medication errors. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #8 received her full three-week course of antibiotics as recommended by the hospital. Findings include: I. Professional reference Combating Antibiotic Resistance, reviewed 10/29/19, was retrieved on 8/23/24 from https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/combating-antibiotic-resistance. It read in pertinent part, Antibiotic resistance is a growing public health concern worldwide. In cooperation with other government agencies, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has launched several initiatives to address antibiotic resistance. The agency has issued drug labeling regulations, emphasizing the prudent use of antibiotics. The regulations encourage health care professionals to prescribe antibiotics only when clinically necessary, and to counsel patients about the proper use of such drugs and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective quality assurance program to identify and address facility compliance concerns was implemented in order to facilitate improvement in the lives of nursing home residents, through continuous attention to qualify of care, quality of life, and resident safety. Specifically, the facility's quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to effectively identify and address concerns related to residents' quality of care, quality of life, staff training and infection prevention and control. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) Analysis and Action policy, dated March 2020, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/17/24 at 2:36 p.m. via email. The policy read in pertinent part, The QAPI program, overseen by the QAPI committee, is designed to identify and address quality deficiencies through the analysis of the underlying causes and actions targeted at correcting systems at a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-12 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a qualified infection preventionist (IP) was in place for providing guidance to the facility on the infection control policy and programs which had the potential to affect all 74 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. Specifically, the facility failed to have a designated IP who had the time necessary to properly assess, develop, implement, monitor, and manage the infection prevention and control program (IPCP) for the facility. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Infection Prevention and Control Program policy, revised October 2018, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/10/24 at 10:24 a.m. It documented in pertinent part, Policies and procedures reflect the current infection prevention and control standards of practice. II. Observations Observations throughout the survey (from 6/5/24 to 6/12/24) revealed multiple infection control failures within the facility. Cross-reference F880 for failure to implement an effective infection prevention and control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to act promptly upon the grievances concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility that were important to the residents. Specifically, the facility failed to timely create effective interventions and maintain a systematic approach to ongoing resident grievances of call light response times addressed in resident council. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Council policy, revised April 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/12/24 at 11:23 a.m. The policy read in pertinent part, The purpose of the resident council is to provide a forum for: -Residents, families and resident representatives to have input in the operation of the facility; -Discussion of concerns and suggestions for improvement; -Consensus building and communication between residents and facility staff; and, disseminating information and gathering feedback from interested residents. A resident council response form will be utilized to track issues and their resolution. The facility department…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to coordinate assessment with the preadmission screening resident review (PASRR) program for five (#26, #36, #4, #18 and #22) of eight residents reviewed for PASRR out of 45 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to coordinate a PASRR Level II evaluation for Resident #26, #36, #4, #18 and #22. Findings include: I. Resident #26 A. Resident status Resident #26, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the June 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included generalized anxiety disorder and bipolar disorder (mental illness that causes shifts in a person's behaviors). The 2/26/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment documented Resident #26 was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. Resident #26 experienced feeling down, depressed or hopeless for several days during the review period. B. Record review Resident #26 had a PASRR Level I identification screen approved on 5/31/23 that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for four out of five staff reviewed. Specifically, the facility had not completed annual performance reviews and/or provided regular in-service education based on the outcome of the reviews for certified nurse aide (CNA) #2, CNA #5, CNA #4 and CNA #3. Findings include: I. Record review CNA #2 (hired on 5/16/23), CNA #5 (hired on 8/18/21), CNA #4 (hired on 4/6/17), and CNA #3 (hired on 2/1/23) did not have an annual performance review completed. The CNAs did not have an in-service education plan based on the outcome of the review. II. Staff interviews The director of nursing (DON) was interviewed on 6/6/24 at 4:25 p.m. The DON said she was the staff development coordinator because the facility just hired someone who was still in training. The NHA and the DON were interviewed together on 6/11/24 at 4:10 p.m. The DON said she was unaware when she provided CNAs with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen and three of three unit refrigerators. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff followed appropriate hand washing and glove usage in the main kitchen; and, -Ensure food was labeled and stored appropriately in the main kitchen refrigerator and freezer and in three unit refrigerators. Findings include: I. Staff hand hygiene A. Professional reference According to The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (2024) The Colorado Retail and Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, retrieved on 6/24/24 from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kEtv4f6YciFXXzLEu6amUc9Anu9uWGYn/view, Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles and: after touching bare human body parts other than clean hands and clean, exposed portions of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical and patient care equipment in safe operating condition. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure facility staff used a blood pressure cuffs which were rated for medical use. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the [NAME] Advantage for Basic Nursing handbook, third edition, retrieved on 6/17/24 from Treas, [NAME] S., et al. [NAME] Advantage for Basic Nursing: Thinking, Doing, and Caring. F. A. [NAME] Company, 2022., Blood Pressure - Practical Knowledge, Electronic blood pressure monitors may be less accurate than those with an aneroid monitor (a manual blood pressure measuring device). To ensure accuracy, you should auscultate (listen to) a baseline blood pressure before initiating automatic monitoring. Ensure devices are rated for medical use. The width of the blood pressure cuff bladder of a properly fitting cuff will cover approximately two-thirds of the length of the upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide training to their staff that at a minimum educates staff on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property as set forth, procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property and dementia management and resident abuse prevention. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure the activities assistant (AA), the cook (CK) and housekeeper (HSKP) #1 received annual training that covered abuse, reporting incidents of abuse and resident abuse prevention over the last 12 months; and, -Ensure the CK, dietary aide (DA) #2 and the maintenance assistant (MA) received annual training that covered dementia management. Findings include: I. Facility policies The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised April 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/6/24 at 2:40 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure certified nurse aides (CNA) received at least 12 hours of annual in-service training that also included dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training to ensure continued competence for four out of five staff reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure CNA #2, #5, #4 and #1 received 12 hours of continuing education annually in all required training topic areas, including dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training. Findings include I. Training record review Five randomly selected CNA training records were reviewed on 6/10/24. Of the five employees reviewed, four of the CNAs (#2, #5 #4 and #1) did not receive a full 12 hours of annual training. A. CNA #2 -CNA #2, hired on 5/16/23, had participated in six hours and 45 minutes of training during the annual training year. B. CNA #5 -CNA #5, hired on 8/18/21, had participated in a four-hour dementia class. The nursing home administrator (NHA) was unable to provide her complete training record, including completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that personal funds accounts were managed adequately for one (#19) of five residents out of 45 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to have personal funds withdrawal sheets signed to ensure the Resident #19' s permission was obtained to withdraw funds from his personal needs account. Findings include: I. Personal funds withdrawal The Personal Funds Withdrawal sheet was reviewed for Resident #19 on 6/10/24. The resident was found to have three withdrawals from his account with no signed authorization. The withdrawals were as follows: -On 5/7/24 a withdrawal was made for $94.00; -On 4/11/24 a withdrawal was made for $105.00; and, -On 3/4/24 a withdrawal was made for $110.00. -The facility failed to provide receipts or signed authorization from the resident for the withdrawals. II. Staff interviews The business office manager (BOM) was interviewed on 6/11/24 at 11:45 a.m. The BOM said Resident #19' s legal representative requested the resident' s funds from the resident' s personal needs account each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to inform one (#216) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices out of 45 sample residents of changes in their services covered by Medicare in a timely manner. Specifically, the facility failed to provide a Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to Resident #216 two days prior to discharge of Medicare Part A funded services. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The NOMNC procedure was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on [DATE] at 10:15 a.m. It read in pertinent part, A Medicare provider must deliver a completed copy of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to beneficiaries or enrollees receiving covered skilled nursing, home health, comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility and hospice services. The NOMNC must be delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare-covered services end. II. Record review A. Resident #216 The electronic medical record (EMR) revealed Resident #216 was discharged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for one (#17) of three residents reviewed for abuse out of 45 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to investigate an incident where Resident #17 reported a staff member threatened him. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program policy, revised April 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/6/24 at 2:40 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. The program consists of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to support the following objectives: -Protect residents from abuse, neglect,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was in place for one (#65) of three residents reviewed for discharge out of 45 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #65's discharge summary included a recapitulation of the resident's stay and a complete final summary of the resident's status. Findings include: A. Resident status Resident #65, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and discharged to another long-term care facility on 4/5/24. According to the April 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included hyperkalemia (higher than normal potassium in the blood), benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlargement of the prostate) and major depressive disorder. The 2/6/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15. The resident required supervision with activities of daily living (ADL). B. Record review The Discharge summary dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision abilities for one (#19) of one resident reviewed for vision problems out of 45 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #19 was assisted to receive his new glasses. Findings include: I. Resident #19 A. Resident status Resident #19, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the June 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbation and malignant neoplasm of the prostate. The 4/30/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. The resident required substantial assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). The MDS assessment documented the resident had adequate vision with eye glasses. B. Resident interview Resident #19 was interviewed on 6/6/24 at 9:52…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#54) of three residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services out of 45 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide restorative therapy services to Resident #54. Findings include: I. Professional Reference According to the American Association of Post-Acute Nursing (AAPACN) Guidelines for Restorative Nursing Programs, retrieved on 6/17/24 from aapacn.org/restorative-programs-guide/, The risk for functional decline in long term care residents is a serious issue that often leads to falls, pressure ulcers/injuries, weight loss, depression, and other negative outcomes. To ensure quality outcomes and to comply with federal regulation, nursing facilities must have a comprehensive and effective restorative therapy program that encourages each resident's highest level of function. II. Resident #54 A. Resident status Resident #54, age greater than 65, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for one (#22) of five residents reviewed for medications out of 45 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications were discontinued after 14 days for Resident #22. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #22, age over 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the June 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder and chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure. The 3/15/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment documented Resident #22 was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. The assessment documented Resident #22 had felt down, depressed or hopeless, felt tired or had little energy, had a poor appetite, felt bad about himself and had trouble concentrating nearly every day during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were properly stored in accordance with professional standards in one of two medication storage rooms and one of two medication storage carts. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure all medications and biologicals were stored appropriately in a secure location; and, -Maintain a medication refrigerator temperature log for one of three medication refrigerators. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to [NAME], P.A., [NAME], A.G., et.al., Fundamentals of Nursing, 10 ed. (2022), Elsevier, St. Louis Missouri, pp. 1976, retrieved on 6/19/24, All drugs are secured in designated areas only accessible to nurses. II. Observations On 6/10/24 at 8:59 p.m., the central hall medication cart was observed in the unlocked position. At 9:02 p.m., registered nurse (RN) #1 approached the medication cart and locked it. III. Record Review The East nursing station refrigerator medication log records from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure two (#62 and #4) of six residents with an order for an altered mechanical soft texture, out of 45 sample residents received food and fluids prepared in a form designed to meet their needs per physician orders. Specifically, the facility failed to provide Resident #62 and Resident #4 the correct mechanically altered diet texture. Findings include: I. Professional reference The Common Ground Between National Dysphagia Diet (NDD) and International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI), reviewed July 2021, retrieved on 6/17/24 from https://iddsi.org/IDDSI/media/images/CountrySpecific/UnitedStates/NDD-to-IDDSI-Implementation.pdf . It read in pertinent part NDD of 2002 is being replaced by the IDDSI Framework, founded in 2013. This is the only professionally recognized and supported diet framework as of October 2021. NDD level three dysphagia advanced is now IDDSI soft and bite-sized level six. The NDD description stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to meet all the requirements for the provision of hospice care for one (#19) of four residents out of 45 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the hospice agency notes regarding Resident #19's care were easily accessible to the facility staff in an attempt to effectively coordinate care with the hospice agency. Findings include: I. Resident #19 A. Resident status Resident #19, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the June 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with exacerbation and malignant neoplasm of the prostate. The 4/30/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. The resident required substantial assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). The assessment documented the resident was receiving hospice services. B. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of infectious diseases. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure housekeeping staff changed gloves and performed hand hygiene consistently when appropriate during resident room cleaning; -Ensure housekeeping staff properly used a disinfectant chemical per manufacturer's instructions when cleaning resident rooms; -Ensure staff donned (put on) the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing direct care to residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP); -Ensure a process was in place to ensure staff were aware of which residents required EBP; -Provide clean linens after performing wound care and a wound dressing change; -Offer hand hygiene to residents before meals; and, -Implement an effective water management plan. Findings include: I. Housekeeping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents consistently received food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, palatable in taste, texture, appearance and temperature. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure food was served palatable, attractive and served at the appropriate temperature. Findings include: I. Resident interviews Resident #4 was interviewed on 6/5/24 at 10:25 a.m. Resident #4 said the food was not always good. Resident #4 said the food was under seasoned at times and sometimes he received his meal cold. Resident #22 was interviewed on 6/5/24 at 11:00 a.m. Resident #22 said the food was awful and tasted bad. He said he ate his meals in his room and the food was delivered to him cold. Resident #22 said the food looked how it tasted. He said the food was undercooked and over-seasoned. Resident #57 was interviewed on 6/5/24 at 3:35 p.m. Resident #57 said the food was awful and his lunch on 6/5/24 had no seasoning to it. The resident said his food was normally bland and he did not like to eat it. Resident #17…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to inform the resident's representative of a change of condition for one (#173) of four residents reviewed for notification of change out of 45 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #173' s responsible party was notified after an unwitnessed fall. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Fall and Fall Risk, Managing policy, revised March 2018, was provided by the facility on 6/12/24. According to the policy, a fall was: Unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor or lower level, but not as a result of an overwhelming external force. An episode where a resident lost his or her balance and would have fallen, if not for another person or if he or she had not caught himself, is considered a fall. A fall without injury is still a fall. Unless there is evidence suggesting otherwise, when a resident is found on the floor, a fall is considered to have occurred. II. Resident #173 A. Resident status Resident #173, age…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent falls, and failed to assess, implement and monitor interventions consistent with resident needs for one (#173) of four residents reviewed for falls out of 45 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Assess Resident #173 after a potential fall and after injuries were identified and report the potential fall; -Monitor Resident #173 after facial injuries were identified; -Ensure safe smoking practices were conducted for Resident #173 and care planned; and, -Ensure interventions were care planned for Resident #173 who was identified at moderate risk for falls. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Fall and Fall Risk Managing policy, revised March 2018, was provided by the facility on 6/12/24. The policy documented in pertinent part, Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident specific risk and cost to prevent the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to take steps to prevent one (#2) of three residents reviewed for wandering of 12 sample residents safe from eloping from the facility. Specifically, the facility: -Failed to identify goals and interventions on the baseline care plan to ensure Resident #2 ' s health and safety related to elopement; -Failed to ensure a thorough shift report was provided to the oncoming nurse during change of shift to inform of Resident #2 ' s wandering activities, and -Failed to ensure Resident #2 did not elope from the facility. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Elopement, Risk Reduction Strategies, and Management of Missing Residents policy, dated 7/17/23, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on November 22, 2023 at 6:57 a.m. It included the following: An elopement risk assessment is completed by the nursing staff on all residents at admission, readmission, quarterly, upon change of condition, and after an elopement event. The initial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-02-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident, family and staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for nine (#60, #36, #63, #13, #29, #14, #24, #34, #43) of 31 sample residents. Resident, family, and staff interviews revealed the facility failed to consistently provide adequate nursing staff resulting in delayed call light response, and prolonged wait times for assistance with activities of daily living such as assistance to and from the toilet. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Staffing policy, revised 10/2017, provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 2/13/2020 at 12:00 p.m. read, our facility provides sufficient number of staff with the skills and competency necessary to provide care and services for all resident in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. II. Resident census and conditions According to the resident census and conditions report signed by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment in two (east and west) of three resident hallways. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents had adequate access to clean bath linens at all times. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Quality of Life - Homelike Environment policy, revised May 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/13/2020 at 1:30 p.m. It documented the purpose of this policy was to provide the residents with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment by maximizing the characteristics of the facility which reflected a personalized, homelike environment. One of those characteristics included clean bath linens that were in good condition. II. Resident council interview During the resident council interview conducted on 2/12/20 from 10:00 a.m. through 11:00 a.m., Resident #34 showed a picture he had taken on his cell phone at 9:25 a.m. that morning of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#46) of three residents reviewed for bathing and grooming received the necessary assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #46 received timely assistance with wheelchair positioning, and clothing and eye cleanliness. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedures A. The Activities of Daily Living, Supporting policy and procedure, dated November 2019, was provided by the director of nurses (DON) on 2/13/2020 at 1:15 p.m. It included residents who were unable to carry out ADLs independently would receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Appropriate care and services would be provided for residents who were unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to monitor and document pain management for one (#20) of four residents reviewed for pain management of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement the resident's pain management care plan, and monitor, document and assess Resident #20's level of pain at least every shift. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The pain management policy, revised 10/11/19, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/12/20 at 1:30 p.m. It documented the purpose of this policy was to accurately assess and achieve pain control for the facility's residents. It documented a pain evaluation should include the following: location(s), quality, intensity, associated symptoms, precipitating, aggravating and relieving factors, chronology, pattern (frequency, onset and duration of pain), medication regimen and other treatment modalities used for pain management and their degree of effectiveness. It documented all subsequent pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-12-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary and orderly interior in three of three hallways for residents residing in the facility. Findings include: I. Observations A. Resident rooms in the [NAME] hallway On 12/11/18 at 9:49 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER] there were approximately 10 one and one half inch x shaped marks on the north facing wall where nails had been in the wall. The white caulking in the lower left corner of the window had black streaks on the edges with a solid black center. On 12/12/18 at 12:56 p.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER] the toilet seat was loose and moved side to side. B. Resident rooms in the Center hallway On 12/10/18 at 9:16 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a large crack in the wall next to the resident's mirror. On 12/11/18 at 8:51 a.m., additional cracks in the wall were observed in the resident bathroom. The bottom shelf of the medicine cabinet was rusted and not a cleanable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-12-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were properly stored in three of three medication storage refrigerators. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that vaccines were stored according to practice standards and manufacturer guidelines. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention (CDC) Vaccine Storage and Handling (2018), retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/admin/storage/toolkit/storage-handling-toolkit.pdf, do not store any vaccine in a dormitory style or bar-style combined refrigerator/ freezer unit under any circumstances. These units have a single exterior door and an evaporator plate/cooling coil, usually located in an ice maker/freezer compartment. These units have been shown to pose a significant risk of freezing vaccines, even when used for temporary storage. All staff members who receive deliveries and/or handle or administer vaccines should be familiar with storage and handling policies and procedures at your facility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible for one (#45) of six residents reviewed for falls of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the call light was placed in a safe position and remained within reach for Resident #45. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Fall Management policy, dated 2/4/16, was provided by the medical records coordinator (MR) on 12/13/18 at 3:02 p.m., and documented a fall reduction program would be established and maintained, to assess all residents to determine their risk for falls. The facility was to identify risk factors that included the resident's physical health, functional status, and environmental conditions, which were followed by timely and appropriate interventions. II. Resident #45 status Resident #45, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2018 computerized physician orders, diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the electronic medical record (EMR) for two (#63 and #45) of four residents reviewed for weight discrepancies of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that resident weights were both timely and accurately documented for Residents #63 and #45. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Weight Management policy, dated 10/1/13, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 12/13/18 at 1:25 p.m., and documented all residents were to be weighed upon admission, then monthly or as indicated by physician orders, and document the results in the medical record. Residents were monitored for significant weight change on a regular basis. Results were reviewed and analyzed by the facility for intervention as appropriate. II. Record review A. Resident #45 Resident #45's weights were reviewed from 9/3/18 through 12/3/18. The weights were documented in three separate places in the medical record including the bath sheets, a Master Sheet that was sent to the dietary department,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure infection control standards of practice were followed for one of three blood glucose monitoring devices. Specifically, the facility failed to properly disinfect and store the blood glucose monitoring device after use on Resident #48. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) Injection Safety, retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/injectionsafety/blood-glucose-monitoring.html, blood glucose meters are devices that measure blood glucose levels. Whenever possible, blood glucose meters should be assigned to an individual person and not be shared. If blood glucose meters must be shared, the device should be cleaned and disinfected after every use, per manufacturer's instructions, to prevent carry-over of blood and infectious agents. If the manufacturer does not specify how the device should be cleaned and disinfected then it should not be shared. II. Facility policy and procedure According to the Cleaning and Disinfecting Glucometers policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-06-12 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to post nurse staffing information daily. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Post the total number of actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed staff directly responsible for resident care per shift; and, -Maintain staffing data for 18 months as required. Findings include: I. Observations Observations in the facility on 6/5/24 at 10:00 a.m. revealed no nurse staffing posting. Observations in the facility on 6/6/24 at 12:00 p.m. revealed no nurse staffing posting. II. Record review A request for the required May 2023 to May 2024 staff posting was requested on 6/6/24 at 4:25 p.m. The DON said the facility had not utilized staff posting in over four years (see interview below). III. Staff interviews The director of nursing (DON) was interviewed on 6/6/24 at 4:25 p.m. The DON said she was covering as the staff development coordinator until the new staff development coordinator, who was hired, was fully trained. She said she used a sheet similar to the daily working schedule and had them posted at each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$63,613 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $14,901 — penalty dated 2026-02-04
  • $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-12-09
  • $8,856 — penalty dated 2025-07-01
  • $30,746 — penalty dated 2024-06-12
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-11 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CENTENNIAL MASTER TENANT, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/11/2022
PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/30/2023
MOHLER, AMYIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/06/2014
PERKES, BLAIRIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/24/2023
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$342K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 51%Medicare 5%Other / private 44%

This home reported $342K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$359per resident / day
operating cost
$10,926per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$327per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Colorado
$10,159/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,182/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,584/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065286. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next