No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Skylake Post Acute

12080 Bellaire Wy, Thornton, CO 80241 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 242 certified beds · (303) 450-2700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2026Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$25,572 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $25,572 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-14)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
2616 E. 120th Ave.
Pharmacy
4001 E 120th Ave · (303) 451-5562 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.2 mi
3904 E 120th Ave · (303) 457-2995 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Skylake Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3851 E 120th Ave · (303) 853-4673

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.4%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.2%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.1%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.4%8.8%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.3%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.3%13.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.0%11.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.6%21.2%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.1%20.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.6%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.5%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.5%20.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.7%12.1%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.351.381.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.671.741.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.11U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.4–16.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.57
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.91
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
35.0%
Total nursing turnover
19.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 242 beds and averages 190.9 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 51 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.91 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.57 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.03 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-01)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two (#4 and #16) of seven sample residents reviewed for change of condition assessments out of 14 sample residents. Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, severe, with other behavioral disturbance, pancytopenia (lower than normal count of all three types of blood cells), and protein-calorie malnutrition.On 12/10/25 the facility documented that Resident #4 had decreased oral and fluid intake. On 12/11/25 Resident #4 sustained an unwitnessed fall, where his mattress was found partially off the bed frame. The staff documented a decline in the resident's function and he continued to have decreased oral and fluid intake, had increased weakness and confusion, had unsteady balance and was pale. Despite the nursing staff noticing a change in condition, the facility failed to notify the physician of the change in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect and keep residents safe from abuse and neglect for two (#2 and #11) of three residents reviewed for abuse out of 16 sample residents. A review of resident records and interviews with staff revealed the facility failed to take steps to develop and implement effective interventions to create an environment in the memory care-secure unit that protected residents from resident-to-resident abuse. RESIDENTS #6 AND #2 On 4/8/24, Resident #6 was admitted to the facility's memory care-secured unit. It was known to the facility, before the resident's admission, that he was displaying an increase in unsafe wandering and physical and verbal aggression toward other residents at the facility where he had previously resided. Resident #6 was discharged from his previous facility to the hospital due to his aggressive behaviors and remained at the hospital waiting until another long-term care facility placement could be obtained. A pre-admission long-term care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. A review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #110 with diagnoses that included quadriplegia and right-hand contracture. A review of Resident #110's care plan, last revised 08/15/2022 revealed a focus area that stated the resident may smoke with supervision per smoking assessment. Patient refuses to wear a smoking apron at times. Patient often insists on going out to smoking (sic) at 3:30 in the morning. Patient refuses to let staff assist with flipping [his/her] ashes. The goal was that the resident would smoke safely for 90 days, and the interventions included encourage the resident to wear a smoking apron, inform and reinforce smoking restrictions, inform and remind the resident of locations of smoking areas and smoking times, supervise patient with smoking in accordance with assessed needs, and monitor the residents compliance with the smoking policy. A review of Resident #110's Smoking Evaluation (SNF) [skilled nursing facility] form, dated 07/07/2022 revealed supervised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four (#17, #6, #7 and #5) of seven residents reviewed for abuse out of 14 sample residents were kept free from abuse.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Prevent an incident of physical abuse between Resident #6 and Resident #17;-Prevent an incident of physical abuse between Resident #6 and Resident #7; and,-Protect Resident #5 from physical abuse by Resident #6. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program policy and procedure, revised April 2021, was provided by regional director of clinical services #1 on 5/11/26 at 5:04 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The resident abuse, neglect and exploitation prevention program consists of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to support objectives including providing staff orientation and training which included topics such as handling verbally or physically aggressive resident behavior.II. Incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide choices for preference of bathing schedule for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for self-determination out of eight sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received showers consistent with her preferences.Findings include:I. Resident #1A. Resident statusResident #1, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on 1/28/26. According to the January 2026 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included severe sepsis with septic shock (severe infection that causes organ failure), pneumonia, major depressive disorder, and weakness. The 1/22/26 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. She required set-up or clean-up assistance with eating and substantial to maximal assistance with oral hygiene, toileting hygiene and dressing. -The MDS assessment revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents reviewed for accidents out of eight sample residents received adequate supervision to prevent risk for accident hazards.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure safe assistance was provided by staff during incontinence care for Resident #1, which resulted in the resident sustaining a fall with minor injuries when she rolled out of bed during the care.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedureThe Falls - Clinical Protocol policy, revised March 2018, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 3/4/26 at 3:04 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The physician will help identify individuals with a history of falls and risk factors for falling. Staff will ask the resident and the caregiver or family about a history of falling. The staff and physician will document in the medical record a history of one or more recent falls. The nurse shall assess and document or report vital signs, recent injury, especially…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food served accommodated residents' allergies and intolerances for one (#1) of three residents reviewed out of eight sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not served food the resident was allergic to, despite the resident having a documented food allergy.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Food Allergies and Intolerances policy, revised August 2017, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 3/4/26 at 3:04 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Residents with food allergies and or intolerances are identified upon admission and offered food substitutions of similar appeal and nutritional value. Steps are taken to prevent resident exposure to the allergen. Residents are assessed for a history of food allergies and intolerances upon admission and as part of the comprehensive assessment. All reported food allergies and intolerances are documented into the resident care plan. Residents with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure:-Beard nets were worn while preparing food in the main kitchen;-Hand hygiene was conducted during meal service and dishwashing; and,-Food was labeled and dated in the walk-in refrigerator, walk-in freezer and reach-in refrigerators. Findings include:I. Failure to ensure beard nets were worn in the kitchenA. Professional referenceThe Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, revised 3/16/24, was retrieved on 9/29/25. It revealed in pertinent part, Food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils, linens and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles. (Chapter 2)B. Facility policy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure there were monitoring measures maintained for all control measures identified that may contribute to the spread of legionella (a type of bacteria that can cause legionella disease, a severe form of pneumonia): -Ensure the facility water management plan was reviewed annually; and,-Ensure the facility water management plan was personalized and specific to the facility. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Legionella Water Management Program policy and procedure, revised June 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/25/25 at 12:27 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The purposes of a water management program are to identify areas in the water system where Legionella bacteria can grow and spread.Specific measures used to control the introduction and/or spread of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect for two of four units. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Provide Resident #155 privacy while he used the restroom, and,-Staff announced themselves prior to entering residents' rooms. Findings include:I. Resident #155A. Resident statusResident #155, age [AGE], was admitted [DATE]. According to the September 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and the skull) without loss of consciousness, dementia with agitation, cancer of the thyroid gland, and rheumatoid arthritis. The 6/25/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #155 had moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15. The MDS further revealed Resident #155 was independent for all of his activities of daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were stored and labeled properly according to professional standards in three of four medications rooms, one of five medication carts and one of one vaccine storage refrigerators.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure expired vaccines were removed from refrigerators;-Ensure Tubersol (used to test for tuberculosis) vials were dated upon opening;-Ensure vaccinations were not stored in dormitory style refrigerator;-Ensure expired insulin pens were removed from the medication cart;-Ensure expired medications were removed from over the counter medications supply; and,-Ensure discarded medications were destroyed timely. Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to the Vaccine Storage and Handling Tool-kit, dated 3/29/24, retrieved on 9/29/25, from https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/downloads/storage-handling-toolkit.pdf, Do not store any vaccine in a dormitory-style or bar-style combined refrigerator/freezer unit under any circumstances. These units have a single exterior door and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure money from personal funds accounts was managed accurately for two (#175 and #45) out of five residents reviewed for personal funds accounts out of 71 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to notify Resident #175 and Resident #45, who were Medicaid funded, or their legal representative when the resident's personal funds account reached $200.00 less than the eligibility resource limit. Findings include:I. Resident accountsA. Resident #175Resident #175 had an account balance of $1,915.07.-There was no documentation the facility had notified Resident #175 or her legal representative when her personal funds account reached $200 less than the eligibility resource limit.B. Resident #45Resident #45 had an account balance of $1,892.06.-There was no documentation the facility had notified Resident #45 or her legal representative when her personal funds account reached $200 less than the eligibility resource limit.II. Staff interviewsThe nursing home administrator (NHA) was interviewed on 9/23/25 at 1:15 p.m. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision, assistance, services, and implement effective person centered interventions to prevent falls with injuries for one (#156) of three residents reviewed for accidents/hazards out of 71 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the staff were aware and implemented Resident #156's fall interventions consistently. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Fall Risk policy, revised March 2018, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/25/25 at 9:21 a.m. It read in pertinent part,The staff, with the input of the attending physician, will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls. In conjunction with the attending physician, staff will identify and implement relevant interventions (hip padding or treatment of osteoporosis, as applicable) to try to minimize serious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors, received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional stands or practice and accounting for the residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one (#144) of three residents reviewed out of 71 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure individualized care approaches were provided for Resident #144 to prevent re-traumatization. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Trauma Informed Care and Culturally Competent Care policy, revised August 2022, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 9/25/25 at 9:29 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Develop individualized care plans that address past trauma in collaboration with the resident and family, as appropriate. Identify and decrease exposure to triggers that may re-traumatize the resident.II. Resident #144A.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for one (#130) of three residents reviewed out of 71 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Document resident specific care approaches, to include medication specific target behaviors and person-centered interventions for Resident #130; and,-Document attempted non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of a as needed (PRN) anti anxiety medication. Findings include:I. Resident #130A. Resident statusResident #130, age greater than 65, was admitted to the facility 8/21/25. According to the September 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnosis included cognitive communication deficit and dementia with behavioral disturbances and agitation.The 8/27/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of seven out of 15. He required substantial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement their policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling and consumption on two of four hallways.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure safe and appropriate storage of food items in resident's personal refrigerators. Findings include: I. Professional reference The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Regulations, (3/16/24), retrieved on 9/29/25 read in pertinent part, Except during preparation, cooking, or cooling, or when time is used as the public health control, time/temperature control for safety food shall be maintained at 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or above, or at 41 degrees F or less (3-501.16). Ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or less for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to establish a communication process that included how the communication would be documented between the facility and the provider for two (#11 and #9) of four residents reviewed for hospice care out of 71 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to establish a communication process according to the hospice agreement that included documentation of care and services provided by hospice filed and maintained for Resident #11 and Resident #99. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Hospice Program policy, revised July 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/25/25 at 9:30 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Our facility has an agreement in place with at least one Medicare-certified hospice to ensure that residents who wish to participate in a hospice program may do so. Hospice providers who contract with this facility must have a written agreement with the facility outlining (in detail) the responsibilities of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff wore the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing direct care to a resident who was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP); and, -Follow appropriate infection control measures during wound care. Findings include: I. PPE failures A. Facility policy and procedure The Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, undated, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 5/7/25 at 9:20 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Enhanced barrier precautions refer to the use of gown and gloves for use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized of infected with a multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition. High-contact resident care activities include: dressing, bathing, transferring, providing hygiene, changing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-14 · tag F0843 — widespread
    Have an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a written transfer agreement with one or more hospitals approved for participation under Medicare and Medicaid programs to reasonably ensure residents would be transferred from the facility to a hospital, and assured of timely admission to the hospital when transfer was medically appropriate. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a written agreement was in effect with one local area hospital. Findings include: I. Record review A request was made to the director of nursing (DON) and corporate nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 6/13/24 at 4:27 p.m., for the facility's hospital transfer agreement. -The facility was unable to provide a written agreement for the one area hospital. II. Interview The interim nursing home administrator (INHA) and CNC #1 and CNC #2 were interviewed together on 6/14/24 at 3:55 p.m. The INHA said the facility did not have a hospital transfer agreement. The INHA said no area hospitals would provide the facility with a transfer agreement because the hospitals took residents based on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents out of 16 sample residents had the right to be informed of and participate in care plan meetings and to develop his or her treatment plan including the right to be informed, in advance, of the care to be furnished and the type of caregiver or professional that would furnish care. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Inform Resident #1's legal representative in advance of the facility's scheduled care plan meetings so the representative could participate in care planning; -Inform Resident #1's legal representative of when upcoming podiatry and dental services were to be provided so the representative could be informed and assist with treatment decisions; and, -Notify and inform Resident #1's legal representative of changes in the resident's condition, including falls. The findings include: I. Facility Policy and Procedure On 6/13/24 the Resident Representative policy, revised February 2021, was provided by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown origin were reported immediately for one (#1) of three residents reviewed out of 16 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to report an allegation of an injury of unknown origin (bite wound) to the State oversight agency within 24 hours of the injury being discovered. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating policy, revised September 2022, was received from the director of nursing (DON) on 6/14/24 at 10:30 a.m. The policy documented in pertinent part, All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of property are reported to the local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. If resident abuse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure incidents of potential abuse were thoroughly investigated for one (#1) of three residents out of 16 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse, reported following the discovery of an injury of unknown origin, a bite wound, was thoroughly investigated and that the resident was monitored to prevent the possibility of a repeated instance. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating policy, revised September 2022, was received from the director of nursing (DON) on 6/14/24 at 10:30 a.m. The policy documented in pertinent part, All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of property are reported to the local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in a sanitary manner. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff washed hands and changed single use gloves appropriately while plating and serving resident meals in the main kitchen; -Ensure food in the walk-in refrigerator and the reach-in refrigerators in the main kitchen, and in two of two resident unit snack refrigerators was labeled and dated with an open date and disposed of timely when past the used by date; and, -Ensure that expired foods were not served to residents., Findings include: I. Hand hygiene A. Professional reference The Colorado Retail Food Regulations, effective 1/1/19, were retrieved 1/11/24 from https://cdphe.colorado.gov/environment/food-regulations. It revealed in pertinent part, Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms as immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single service and single-use articles and:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection for two out of three units at the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure accurate transmission based precaution procedures were followed, including use of isolation signage on resident doors and following proper procedures for donning (put on) personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering a resident's room who was COVID-19 positive. -Ensure housekeeping staff followed appropriate infection control procedures such as hand hygiene and surface disinfectant time adherence. I. Transmission based precaution and PPE A. Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Hand Hygiene updated 5/8/23, retrieved on 1/15/24 from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/infection-control-recommendations.html#r2 revealed in part,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure essential laundry dryer equipment was in safe working order in the facility laundry room. Specifically, the facility failed to keep the dryer lint filters and compartments cleaned and without lint building up in three of three facility dryers. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the US Department of Labor Occupational Safety NS Health Administration (OSHA), Laundry: Fire Hazards, 2023, retrieved 1/15/24 online form https://www.osha.gov/etools/hospitals/laundry/fire-hazards, Lint build-up on ceilings and other surfaces can increase the risk of fire. Lint build-up in lint traps within dryers can also be a hazard. It is important that employers implement a fire prevention plan in the laundry because of the fire hazards. Routine cleaning surfaces of lint and emptying of lint traps: Fire prevention plan: The purpose of a fire prevention plan is to prevent a fire from occurring. II. Dryer vent system observations On 1/8/24 at 3:00 p.m., the laundry room's three industrial dryers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided prompt efforts by the facility to follow up on grievances. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure grievances and or complaints were filed and the facility actions and resolutions were documented; -Ensure residents were informed of grievances outcomes and of the facility's actions to resolve grievances; -Ensure residents received a resolution to the residents' satisfaction; -Ensure staff were trained and educated on the facility's grievance process; and, -Ensure call lights were answered timely. Findings include: A. Facility policy and procedure The grievances policy and procedure, revised April 2017, was provided by the corporate nurse consultant (CNC) on 1/9/24 at 5:30 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Upon receiving agreements and complaint report, grievance officer will begin an investigation into the allegations. The department directors of any named employees will be notified of the nature of the complaint and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure seven of seven nursing staff members were able to demonstrate skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure that registered nurse (RN) #3 and licensed practical nurse (LPN) #1 had specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs; and, -Ensure certified nurse aides (CNA) #4, CNA #5, CNA #6, CNA #7 and CNA #8 were able to demonstrate competencies in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments and described in the plan of care. Cross-reference F689: the facility failed to prevent accident hazards utilizing mechanical lift for transfers. Cross-reference F695: the facility failed to maintain a resident's respiratory equipment according to professional standards. Cross-refrence to F880: failure to perform hand hygiene as required and failure to offer resident hand hygiene as required. Findings include: I. Record review The employee files for RN #1, LPN #1, and CNA #3, #4,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for four of five certified nurse aides. Specifically, the facility had not completed annual performance reviews for certified nurse aide (CNA) #4, CNA #6, CNA #7 and CNA #8, in order to determine potential training needs. Cross-reference F947 failure to ensure CNAs received adequate training as required. Cross-reference F726 failure to assess nursing staff's competency and skill for quality care. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The In-Service Training, Nurse Aide policy and procedure, revised August 2022, was provided by the corporate nurse consultant (CNC) on 1/10/24 at 1:00 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, The facility completed a performance review of nurse aides at least every 12 months. In-service training is based on the outcome of the annual performance reviews. Annual in-services ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides, address…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a residents diagnosed with dementia, received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for four (#110, #115, #126 and #134) of 10 residents reviewed for dementia care out of 54 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to address wandering behavior and provide meaningful activities for Residents #110, #115, #126 and #134, who had a diagnosis of dementia and resided in the secure unit of the facility. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Dementia policy, revised November 2018, was received on 1/9/24 at 3:30 p.m. by the corporate nurse consultant (CNC). It read in pertinent part: For the individual with confirmed dementia, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) will identify a resident-centered care plan to maximize remaining function and quality of life. Nursing assistants will receive initial training in the care of residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure facility menus met the needs of residents and were followed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure menu items were not omitted from the lunch menu service for 16 of 16 residents with prescribed puree, mechanical soft and bite size diet orders. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Food and Nutrition Services policy and procedure, dated 2001, was provided by the corporate nurse consultant (CNC) on 1/9/24 at 4:07 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well balanced diet that meets his or her special dietary needs taking into consideration the preferences of each resident. Food and nutrition services staff will inspect food trays to ensure that the correct meal is provided to each resident, the food appears palatable and attractive and it is served at a safe and appetizing temperature. If an incorrect meal is provided to a resident or a meal does not appear palatable, the nursing staff will report it to the food service manager so that a new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident food was served at a palatable temperature. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Food and Nutrition Services policy and procedure, dated 2001, was provided by the corporate nurse consultant (CNC) on 1/9/24 at 4:07 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Food and nutrition services staff will inspect food trays to ensure that the correct meal is provided to each resident, the food appears palatable and attractive and it is served at a safe and appetizing temperature. If an incorrect meal is provided to a resident or a meal does not appear palatable, nursing staff will report it to the food service manager that a new food tray can be issued. II. Resident interviews Resident #19 was interviewed on 1/3/24 at 11:17 a.m. Resident #19 said the food was either too hot or cold. She said she had asked the staff to reheat her food. Resident #102 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide food and beverages that accommodated resident preferences for two (#46 and #134) of 10 residents reviewed food and beverage preferences out of 54 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to offer food choices according to Residents #46 and #134's preferences. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Food and Nutrition services policy, revised October 2017, was received on 1/9/24 at 3:30 p.m. by the corporate nurse consultant (CNC). It read in pertinent part: Each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident. The multidisciplinary staff, including nursing staff, the attending physician and the dietitian will assess each resident's nutritional needs, food likes, dislikes and eating habits, as well as physical, functional, and psychosocial factors that affect eating and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide training to their staff that at a minimum educates staff on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property as set forth, procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of resident property and resident abuse prevention for 71 of 96 nursing staff. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff including 71 of the facility's hired certified nurse aides (CNA), registered nurses (RN) and licensed practical nurses (LPN) (#2) received annual abuse identification, prevention and reporting training in the past 12 calendar months. Findings include: I. Facility policy The In-Service Training, All Staff policy, revised August 2022, was provided by the clinical nurse consultant (CNC) on 1/9/24 at 4:06 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part: All staff must participate in initial orientation and annual in-service training. Required training topics include the following: Preventing abuse, neglect, exploitation, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides received the required number of annual in-service training hours to ensure continued competence for four of five nurse aides reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure certified nurse aides (CNA) #4, #6, #7 and #8 received 12 hours of continuing education annually. Cross-reference F943 failure to ensure all staff received training on abuse prevention, identification and reporting. Cross-reference F949 failure to ensure all clinical staff received training on the topic of dementia managed care. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The In-Service Training, Nurse Aide policy and procedure, revised August 2022, was provided by the corporate nurse consultant (CNC) on 1/10/24 at 1:00 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Inservice training is based on the outcome of the annual performance reviews. Annual in-services ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides, are no less than 12 hours per employment year, address areas of weakness as determined by nurse aide performance reviews,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and maintain an effective training program for all staff, which includes, at a minimum, training on behavioral health based on requirements and as outlined in the facility's assessment for 75 out of 96 nursing staff. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that all nursing staff including 75 of the facility's hired certified nurse aides (CNAs), registered nurses (RNs) and licensed practical nurses (LPNs) received training on behavioral health issues to include care specific to the individual needs of residents who were diagnosed with dementia and how to promote meaningful activities and dementia specific care that promoted engagement and positive meaningful relationships. Cross-reference F744 failure to provide dementia-focused care. Findings include: I. Facility policy The In-Service Training, All Staff policy, revised August 2022, was provided by the clinical nurse consultant (CNC) on 1/9/24 at 4:06 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part: All staff must participate in initial orientation and annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown origin were reported immediately for one (#102) resident reviewed out of 54 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within 24 hours to the State Survey Agency. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse policy and procedure, revised 12/31/15, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/3/24 at 11:30 a.m. It read in pertinent part The facility is required to report all allegations of abuse, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property must report even if there is no reasonable suspicion within two (2) hours. II. Allegation of abuse On 1/4/24 at 1:55 p.m. Resident # 102 said a male certified nurse aide (CNA) was rough with her during care within the last two weeks; sometime in December 2023. She said she did not report the violation but was afraid of him working with her. At 2:35 p.m. the NHA was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was as free from accident hazards as possible for two (#19 and #46) of four out of 54 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff received training on safe operating procedures when using a mechanical lifts for Resident #19; -Ensrure staff transferred Resident #19 between surfaces safely using safe transfer techniques; and; -Implement effective interventions for Resident #46 who had known elopement attempts from eloping the building unbeknown to staff and becoming a missing person. Cross-reference F726 failure to ensure nursing staff had the skills and competencies to provide safe and effective care. Findings include: I. Mechanical lift procedure A. Professional reference According to Foundations Assisting with Home Care, Procedure- Assisting with the Use of a Hydraulic Lift, [NAME], K.B., O'Hara-[NAME], E., [NAME], A.C., and SUNY (State University New York) at [NAME], retrieved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#85) of one resident who required continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) respiratory therapy received the care consistent with professional standards of practice out of 54 sample residents. Specifically, for Resident #85 the facility failed to: -Ensure a physician's order was in place for the use of CPAP therapy; -Ensure a care plan focus was in place for the residents CPAP therapy, to include the type of equipment and device settings; when to administer CPAP therapy including frequency; methods of monitoring the resident's use in case of complications;and, -Ensure staff set up the resident's CPAP machine with distilled water. Findings include: I. Facility policies and procedures The CPAP support policy, revised March 2015, was provided by the corporate nurse consultant (CNC) on 1/9/24 at 4:06 p.m. The policy revealed in pertinent part: Provide the spontaneously breathing resident with continuous positive airway pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to implement policies and procedures related to pneumococcal immunizations for one (#46) of five residents reviewed for immunizations out of 54 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to offer Resident #46 additional recommended doses of the pneumococcal vaccination. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Recommended Immunization Schedule for Adults Aged 19 Years or Older, United States, 2023, retrieved on 1/10/24 from https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/adult/adult-combined-schedule.pdf, revealed in pertinent part: Routine vaccination-pneumococcal: routine vaccination for those age [AGE] years or older who have previously received only the PPSV23 (pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine): one dose of PCV15 (pneumococcal conjugate vaccine) or one dose of PCV20. Administer either PCV15 or PCV20 at least 1 year after the last PPSV23 dose. II. Facility policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen. Specifically, the facility: - Failed to ensure food items in the walk-in cooler and freezer were properly sealed, labeled, and dated when opened. - Failed to ensure food items that were visibly spoiled were removed from stock / discarded. - Failed to ensure a refrigerator on Arbor Unit, where residents' food was stored, was maintained in proper working order. - Failed to ensure an ice chest used to pass ice/water to residents on Arbor Unit was cleaned/sanitized after becoming contaminated. - Failed to ensure food delivered from the kitchen was covered during transport to a resident. These failed practices had the potential to affect 174 residents who received food from the kitchen, including 11 residents who also received food from the refrigerator and ice chest on Arbor Unit. Findings included:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to promote privacy while providing incontinence care when the resident's privacy curtain did not provide full privacy. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #117) reviewed for incontinence care. Findings included: Resident #117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #117 was cognitively intact. During an interview with Resident #117 on 9-12-22 at 9:32am, the resident stated she was concerned about her privacy because her privacy curtain did not extend all the way around. The resident stated she had reported the issue to a nurse but could not remember the nurse's name. Observation of the privacy curtain occurred on 9-12-22 at 9:32am. The observation revealed the curtain was not wide enough to extend all the way around the resident exposing either the resident's roommate window which had the blinds pulled up or the door while staff performed care to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-16 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to complete a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) when Resident #17 was diagnosed with a new mental illness. This deficient practice affected Resident #17, 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings included: Review of Resident #17's Colorado Pre-admission and Resident Review Program Level I Identification Screen dated 10/16/2017, revealed there was no major mental illness or psychiatric diagnosis identified for the resident. A review of Resident #17's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #17 on 05/30/2018. According to the admission Record, on 12/16/2019, the resident received new diagnoses of depressive episodes and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. During an observation and interview on 09/12/2022 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$25,572 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $25,572 — penalty dated 2024-06-14
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-17 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PANTHER MASTER TENANT, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/03/2023
PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/03/2023
FRASER, MALCOLMIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/03/2023
GOLDHAMMER, GRADYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/03/2023
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-28.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 2%Other / private 19%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$347per resident / day
operating cost
$10,553per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$271per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Colorado
$10,159/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,182/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,584/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065238. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next