No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Autumn Lake Healthcare At Madison

34 Wildwood Avenue, Madison, CT 06443 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (203) 245-8008 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (203) 245-8008 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$15,593 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,593 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-27)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
230 Boston Post Rd · (203) 245-0496 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
200 Boston Post Rd, Suite 9 · (203) 421-2132 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
26 Meeting House Ln · (860) 713-2500 · Call to confirm hours
Park
283 Clapboard Hill Rd · (203) 458-2582 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.0%18.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.1%6.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms89.7%22.3%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.3%16.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.5%17.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.7%4.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.3%24.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.2%17.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.2%69.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.3%24.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.1%10.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.732.061.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.811.461.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 147 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
76.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 76.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.2%CMS range 53.6–67.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 7.5–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge76.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge68.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.5–10.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.72
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.17
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
40.3%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 83.3 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-25)
23
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review policy and interviews for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #9 and Resident #62) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to prevent the development of pressure ulcers and failed to provide the necessary treatment and services for residents with a pressure ulcer. For Resident #9, the facility failed to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer in a dependent resident, failed to ensure timely turning and repositioning and off-loading/floating (removal of pressure from a body part), failed to conduct pressure ulcer risk assessments per the facility policy, and failed to conduct weekly skin assessments. For Resident #62, the facility failed to conduct an initial pressure ulcer assessment, failed to obtain initial pressure ulcer measurements, failed to inform the wound nurse of the development of a new pressure ulcer, and failed to ensure off-loading/floating of a pressure area. The findings include: 1. Resident #9 's diagnoses included pneumonia, urinary tract infection,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and facility policy reviewed for the initial tour of the kitchen, the facility failed ensure thawing of meat per the requirement. The findings include:Observation on 8/15/2025 at 9:38 AM, identified fish being thawed on one side of a double sink in a water bath and chicken patties in the other side of the double sink in a plastic package without any running water being used. Interview with the Food Service Manager on 8/19/2025 at 11:32 AM identified the fish was in a water bath on 8/15/2025 and he drained the water with the fish in it. The Food Service Manager further indicated that the facility policy for thawing frozen food was to thaw the items either in the refrigerator or under cold running water. Occasionally they thaw frozen food in the microwave. He could not determine why the cook had the fish in a water bath rather than under cold running water, or why the chicken patties in the sink were being thawed without the benefit of running water. Review of the Food Storage Cold policy dated May 2014 directed, in part, the cook thaws frozen items requiring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility documentation, interviews and policy review for 2 of 2 samples residents (Resident #33 and Resident #58) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to honor the residents right to make choices within the facility. The findings included:1. Resident #33's diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the frontal lobe, atherosclerosis of bilateral extremities, and apraxia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #33 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene, oral hygiene, and dressing. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/6/25 identified Resident #33 was at risk for a communication problem related to unclear speech. Interventions included anticipating and meeting the resident's needs as well as avoiding isolation. Interview with the Responsible Party, Person #1, on 8/19/25 at 2:15 PM identified that Resident #33 had presented with long, greasy hair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #30 and Resident #33) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to follow their grievance policy. The findings include:1. Resident #30's diagnosis included multiple sclerosis, anxiety, and pain. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #30 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment and required partial to moderate assistance with upper body dressing and was dependent for lower body dressing. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/7/2025 identified a problem with self-care for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Interventions included providing extensive assistance with bathing, dressing, and bed mobility. Interview with Resident #30 on 8/15/2025 at 10:30 AM identified missing pants. Resident #30 indicated that he/she had informed the laundry personnel but had not received any response. Review of Resident #30's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical record, and facility policy for 1 of 5 (Resident #58) residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect to the State Agency within the 24-hour time requirement. The findings include:Resident #58's diagnoses included fracture of the right femur, anxiety, and parkinsonism.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #58 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition, required maximal assistance for toileting and chair/bed-to-chair transfers, and was dependent for personal hygiene.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 8/5/2025 identified Resident #58 had Parkinson's Disease. Interventions included monitoring for constipation, and monitor/document/report side effects of Parkinson's including gait disturbance, incontinence, decline in range of motion, skin breakdown, and decline in cognitive function.Review of the Nurse Aid (NA) care card (used to direct care) in effect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical record, and facility policy for 1 of 5 sampled residents, (Resident #58) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of neglect. The findings include:Resident #58's diagnoses included fracture of the right femur, anxiety, and parkinsonism. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #58 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition, required maximal assistance for toileting and chair/bed-to-chair transfers, and was dependent for personal hygiene.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) in effect for August 2025 identified Resident #58 had Parkinson's Disease. Interventions included monitoring for constipation, and monitor/document/report side effects of Parkinsons including gait disturbance, incontinence, decline in range of motion, skin breakdown, and decline in cognitive function.Review of the Nurse Aid (NA) care card (used to direct care) in effect during the survey identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled residents (Resident #43) reviewed for skin conditions, the facility failed to follow professional standards of care for the utilization of a post surgically placed wound vac. The findings include: Resident #43 was admitted on [DATE] with the included diagnoses of fusion of spine, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension.The admission Nursing assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #43 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition, was admitted with a surgical incision to the lumbar region of his/her back and required supervision with chair/bed to chair transfers and walking 150 feet. The admission Weekly Skin assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #43 had a lumbar back incision and a wound vac (device to aid in healing). The admission Baseline Care Plan dated 8/3/2025 indicated Resident #43 had a surgical incision with a wound vac. Interventions included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled residents (Resident #43) reviewed for skin conditions, the facility failed to obtain physician order to instruct care for a wound vac for a post-surgical resident. The findings include: Resident #43 was admitted on [DATE] with the included diagnoses of fusion of spine, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension.The admission Nursing assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #43 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition, was admitted with a surgical incision to the lumbar region of his/her back and required supervision with chair/bed to chair transfers and walking 150 feet.The admission Weekly Skin assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #43 had a lumbar back incision and a wound vac (device to aid in healing). The admission Baseline Care Plan dated 8/3/2025 indicated Resident #43 had a surgical incision with a wound vac. Interventions included keeping the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #58) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to implement interventions for pressure ulcer prevention per the Resident Care Plan, report a change in skin integrity, and prevent the development of a pressure ulcer. Resident #58's diagnoses included fracture of the right femur, anxiety, and parkinsonism.The Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #58's skin was normal in color, warm and dry, and no pressure ulcers or deep tissue injuries were present.The admission Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 8/5/2025 identified Resident #58 was at risk for skin breakdown related to impaired mobility. Interventions included floating (not touching the mattress) heels off the bed, keep skin as clean and dry as possible, provide a pressure reducing mattress, and perform skin evaluations as ordered by the Medical Doctor (MD).MD orders dated 8/5/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of the clinical record, and facility policy for the only sampled resident (Resident #9) reviewed for specialized treatments, the facility failed to communicate and collaborate with the specialized treatment center. The findings include:Resident #9's diagnoses included chronic kidney failure and end stage renal disease.A physician's order dated 10/3/24 directed for Resident #9 to receive specialized treatments 3 days a week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #9 was cognitively intact and required supervision and touching assistance for chair/chair-to-bed transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/7/25 identified Resident #9 was at risk for impaired renal function and complications related to specialized treatments. Interventions included to monitor treatment access device for a positive bruit and thrill every shift and as needed, monitor for increase fatigue or weakness, and provide a renal diet as ordered. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy while touring on the Tunxis Unit, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were properly stored and for 2 of 2 medication storage rooms, the facility failed to ensure narcotics were properly secured. The findings include:1. Observation on 8/18/25 at 11:08 AM identified Levothyroxine Sodium 200 Micrograms (mcg) 12 tablets and Doxycycline Hyclate 100 milligrams (mg), 2 tablets stored on the Tunxis Unit Nurse's Station counter. There were no staff observed in the area, but residents could be seen on the unit. The door to enter the nurse's station was open. LPN #3 was summoned by the surveyor to the Tunxis Unit Nurse Station. Interview and observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 on 8/18/25 at 11:12 AM identified the Levothyroxine 200 mcg (12 tablets) and Doxycycline 100 mg (2 tablets) were left unattended and unsecured on the Tunxis Unit Nurse's Station counter. LPN #3 indicated that she left the medications on the counter because they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical records, review of photographs, and review of facility policy for 1 sampled resident (Resident #43) reviewed for discharge and 2 additional previously discharged residents (Resident #48 and Resident #89) the facility failed to ensure protected personal information remained secured and private. The findings include:Interview with Person #6 (Resident #43's family member) on 8/18/2025 at 11:31 AM identified that upon Resident #43's discharge on [DATE], he/she was sent home with a bag of prescriptions medications for Resident #48 and Resident #89. The medications were given to Person #6 by Registered Nurse (RN) #1. Person #6 stated that he/she had just returned the incorrect prescriptions to the Administrator. Person #6 indicated that although none of the incorrect other resident medications had been taken by Resident #43, he/she was very upset that the wrong medications were sent home at discharge and that he/she had taken pictures of the medications to report to the State…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and staff interviews for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #83, and #89) reviewed for blood glucose testing, the facility failed to clean and disinfect a Glucometer (glucose testing) device per the manufacturer's instructions for use. The findings include:Interview with RN #3 (Infection Prevention Nurse) on 8/15/2025 at 11:58 AM identified that glucometers are to be cleaned between every use and as needed with the Super Sani Disinfectant with the purple top lid. 1. Resident #83's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and osteoarthritis.The Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #83 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition, required maximal assistance with his/her personal hygiene, and required extensive assistance with walking in his/her room.A physician's order dated 8/1/2025 directed to obtain a blood glucose level by fingerstick and to administer lispro…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Residents #1 and #2) who were reviewed for a resident-to-resident altercation, Resident #1 had the right to be free from physical abuse by Resident #2. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, transient ischemic attack, and generalized muscle weakness. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/4/24 identified Resident #1 had difficulty communicating, impaired cognitive function and wandered into other residents' rooms. Interventions directed to anticipate and meet needs, administer medications as ordered, discuss changes with family regarding resident's abilities and needs, redirection techniques, and provide activities that interested and engaged the resident. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily life, exhibited wandering behaviors, occasionally rejected care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for end of life, the facility failed ensure the responsible party was notified timely when a change in skin integrity was identified. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnosis that include schizoaffective disorder, generalized muscle weakness and senile degeneration of the brain. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 9/22/2023 identified Resident #1 was at risk for skin breakdown due to inadequate oral intake, fragile skin, incontinence, and limited mobility. Interventions directed to float heels while in bed, low loss mattress, and to evaluate for skin problems. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance for bed mobility, was non-ambulatory, was at risk for pressure ulcers and had one (1) Stage III pressure ulcer. Clinical record review identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for end-of-life care, the facility ensure a complete and accurate record to include records prior to facility ownership, to include documentation of ADL care, documentation of hospice services and documentation of an assessment of death. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnosis that include schizoaffective disorder, generalized muscle weakness and senile degeneration of the brain. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was at risk for skin breakdown due to inadequate oral intake, fragile skin, incontinence, and limited mobility. Interventions directed to float heels while in bed, low loss mattress, and to evaluate for skin problems. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance for bed mobility, was non-ambulatory, was at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility documentation, resident council minutes, facility policy, review of facility staffing hours, and interviews, the facility failed to adequately staff Nurse Aides (NA) throughout the facility resulting in resident care needs not being met. The findings include: 1. Resident #21 's diagnoses included dementia, heart disease, and communication deficit. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #21 was moderately cognitively impaired and required supervision with transfers and extensive assistance with dressing and personal hygiene. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/1/22 identified Resident #21 required assistance with Activities of Daily Living. Interventions included providing staff assistance with personal hygiene. Observation on 11/6/23 at 3:10 PM, identified Resident #21 at the nursing station, with dark debris under 9/10 fingernails that were long, as well as long facial hair. Review of NA flow sheets (amount of care required) from 11/1/23 through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-13 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility policy, facility documentation, and interviews for 2 of 2 resident units, for Resident #'s 28, 51, 61, 278, and 428, who were reviewed for receiving a nourishing snack when mealtimes exceeded 14 hours, the facility failed to provide adequate snacks. The findings include: Intermittent interviews on 10/31/23 between 10:30 AM and 2:00 PM and 11/2/23 between 12:00 PM and 2:00 PM with Resident's #28, 51, 61, 278, and 428 identified that the residents were receiving a small snack in the evening only upon request. The resident's reported examples of the snacks brought when requested were a cookie, cookie bar, apple sauce, or juice and they did not feel that this was an adequate and substantive snack. Interview and review of facility documentation with Dietary Supervisor #2 on 10/31/23 at 10:45 AM during the initial kitchen tour identified that meals were served at 7:30 AM, 11:30 AM, and 4:30 PM and that snacks were given in the evening hours and consist of small items. A 15-hour gap was noted between the dinner service at 4:30 PM and breakfast service at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to follow infection control practices on 1 of 2 units to provide a clean environment for Resident #53, and for the Infection Control Program, failed to ensure all required infection control policies and procedures were present in the Infection Control Manuals. The findings include: 1. Resident #53's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, cognitive communication deficit, and inflammatory polyarthropathy (arthritis affecting 5 or more joints). The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #53 was severely cognitively impaired and required the assistance of 1 staff with bed mobility and transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 11/2/23 identified Resident #53 was at risk for decreased ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) in bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, and dressing related to recent illness, fall, hospitalization resulting in fatigue, activity intolerance, confusion.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-13 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility Resident Council meeting documentation, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to adequately respond to resident grievances. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident Council minutes dated 9/21/23 identified the following concerns: A. The supper meal was arriving too early, at approximately 4:10 PM, and residents were not receiving their alternative meal choices. Review of the Resident Council minutes identified that cooks were made aware of the concern. B. Residents remained in bed until lunch due to the lack of staff, resident beds are not made or changed after residents get up, and staff can be heard discussing concerns regarding staffing issues at the facility. C. The 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM staff were heard loudly discussing residents' personal information in the hallways, using inappropriate language, and nurses were heard yelling down the hall instead of going to directly to speak with staff. 2. Review of the Resident Council minutes dated 10/19/23 identified the following: A. Residents were informed by the Dietary Department of a new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews for 2 of 2 nursing units reviewed for the environment, the facility failed to ensure equipment and furniture was maintained in a clean, comfortable home-like manner. The findings included: During the initial facility tour, observation 10/31/23 at 10:30 AM, on the Tuxis Unit identified trash on the floors in the hallways and in resident's rooms #224, #226, #227, and #228. In room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident #51, surveyor observed a medicine cup on the floor with a white powder that had fallen out of the cup. The white powder was noted to be all over the floor and on the side of the bedside table. Used medical gloves rolled into balls were seen in the flower boxes on both the [NAME] and Tuxis units. Observation on 11/7/23 at 10:00 AM with the Director of Maintenance, in room [ROOM NUMBER] of the [NAME] Unit, identified a piece of wood molding under the window seat that was broken off, exposing a very sharp, rough edge of the wood. Observation of all resident rooms on the Tuxis unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 5 of 35 residents (Resident #21, #27, #46, #53 and #69) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), the facility failed to ensure personal hygiene care and services was provided to dependent residents. The findings include: 1. Resident #21 's diagnoses included dementia, heart disease, and communication deficit. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #21 was moderately cognitively impaired and required supervision with transfers and extensive assistance with dressing and personal hygiene. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/1/22 identified Resident #21 required assistance with Activities of Daily Living. Interventions included providing staff assistance with personal hygiene. Observation on 11/6/23 at 3:10 PM, identified Resident #21 at the nursing station, with dark debris under 9/10 fingernails that were long, as well as long facial hair was noted. Review of NA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 units for Resident #2, #51, #57 and #279 reviewed for oxygen therapy, the facility failed to appropriately label oxygen tubing. The findings include: 1. Resident # 4's diagnoses included anoxic brain damage, hypertension, and anxiety. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 was moderately cognitively impaired and required assistance of 2 staff for bed mobility, transfers, and personal hygiene. The Resident Care Plan dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 was at risk for respiratory complications related to recent hospitalization for upper respiratory infection. Interventions included observing respiratory rate, signs/symptoms of dyspnea (shortness of breath), use of accessory muscles, indicating respiratory distress, and report any signs of respiratory distress to the physician. A physician's order dated [DATE] directed oxygen administration via nasal canula at 2-3 liters per minute to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-13 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files for 2 of 3 Nurse Aides (NA #10 and NA #11), facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to complete annual performance appraisals. The findings include: NA #10's last performance appraisal in NA #10's personnel file was not dated by NA #10 or the next level manager. NA #11's last performance appraisal in NA #11's personnel file was dated 1/23/18 (5 years ago). Interview and facility documentation review with the Administrator on 11/8/23 at 4:04 PM identified she was aware that NA #11's performance appraisals had not been done since 2018 and indicated being aware they should be completed annually. She stated they were not completed due to not having consistent staff, reporting that they had not had payroll, scheduling, or Human Resource staff, and that the Director of Nursing (DNS), had changed numerous times. She indicated the current DNS was trying to catch up on tasks that were not completed by previous staff. The Administrator indicated that the DNS was responsible for completing nursing performance appraisals until all facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of five residents (Resident #62) reviewed for unnecessary medication, and for the only sampled resident (Resident #527) reviewed for physical restraint, the facility failed to ensure that behavior monitoring was completed on a resident receiving psychotropic medications. The findings include: 1. Resident #62's diagnoses included dementia with agitation, anxiety and paranoid personality disorder. An admission physician's order dated 3/10/23 directed to administer Risperidone (an antipsychotic medication) 0.25 milligrams (mg), one tablet by mouth once daily for agitation. Review of APRN #2 orders dated 8/29/23 directed Risperdal 0.25 mg, be given, one tablet by mouth, every evening at 9:00 PM for extreme fear and agitation. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #62 was severely cognitively impaired and required the assistance of 1 staff with bed mobility and 2 staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the clinical record review, facility policy and interviews for 1 sampled resident (Resident #61) reviewed for dentition, the facility failed to provide dental services. The findings include: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included end stage renal disease, right above knee amputation, and coronary artery disease. A Resident Care Plan dated 2/25/22 identified Resident #61 was at risk for oral health or dental care problems as evidence by tooth decay. Interventions included to obtain dental consultation as ordered, assess for oral lesions, inflammation, bleeding and signs and symptoms of pain during care and to report to MD as indicated. An oral health evaluation completed on 2/25/22 at 1:47 PM by Register Nurse (RN) #1 indicated a dental consult as ordered. Resident #61 had an oral health evaluation done on 2/26/23 at 4:51 PM by RN #4 which indicated a dental consult as ordered. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #61 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure safe water temperatures for 1 of 2 units in resident areas. The findings include: Observation on 10/31/23 at 10:46 AM identified the bathroom sink water temperature for Resident #19 and Residents #43 was 125.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Observations on 10/31/23 at 11:20 AM with the Director of Maintenance identified the following: For Resident #19 and Resident's #43, the Director of Maintenance identified the bathroom sink temperature to be 123.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and 125.1 degrees F was measured by the surveyor. For Resident #29 and Resident's #41, the Director of Maintenance identified the bathroom sink water temperature to be 122.6 degrees F, and 124.5 degrees F was measured by the surveyor. For Resident #52 and Resident's #62, the Director of Maintenance identified the bathroom sink temperature to be 125.3 degrees F, and 127.0 degrees F was measured by the surveyor. For Resident #327, the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-13 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Nurse Aide (NA) #1 and NA #10 completed 12 hours of in-service education annually, and failed to provide evidence that all NAs were provided the mandatory 12 hours of in-service training. The findings include: NA #1 completed 5.78 hours of online training, plus an in-person facility training on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and hand washing on 12/10/22 (did not specify length) and an in-person training on Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation on 2/10/23 (did not specify length). The training failed to reflect NA #1 received any dementia care training. NA #10 did not complete any of the online training, but did complete an in-person facility training on PPE and hand washing on 12/10/22 (did not specify length) and an in-person training on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation on 2/10/23 (did not specify length). The training failed to reflect NA #10 received any training on dementia care. Interview with RN #5 on 11/8/23 at 3:58 PM identified she provided all of their education and in-service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #477) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure a urinary privacy bag was utilized. The findings include: Resident #477's diagnosis included fracture of the left femur, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, and dementia. A Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #477 was moderately cognitively impaired, required limited assistance of 1 for bed mobility, extensive assistance of 1 for personal hygiene, bathing, toileting, dressing, and transfers. The Nursing admission Assessment further identified Resident #477 had a suprapubic catheter in place. The Resident Care Plan dated 11/4/23 identified Resident #477 required an indwelling suprapubic catheter. Interventions included to provide privacy and comfort and to keep the catheter off the floor. Observation on 11/7/23 at 12:00 PM identified Resident #477 was sitting in a wheelchair in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 4 residents, (Resident #21, 428, and 527), reviewed for advance directive, the facility failed to ensure Resident #21's current preference for code status was present in the clinical (paper and electronic) health record to appropriately direct staff in the event of a medical emergency and failed to ensure Resident #428 and 527 had an advance directive code status present in the clinical record. The findings include: 1. Resident #21's diagnoses included heart failure, dementia, and anemia. Review of Face Sheet documentation in the clinical record identified Person #3 was the resident representative for Resident #21. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated [DATE] identified Resident #21 had an established advanced directive of full code. Interventions included activating resident's advanced directive as indicated, informing resident/healthcare decision maker of any change in status or care needs, provide resident/healthcare decision maker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #47) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure the resident representative was notified of a significant weight loss. The findings include: Resident #47's diagnosis included dementia, myocardial infarction, and hypertension. Review of a face sheet document in the clinical record identified that Resident #47 was not responsible for him/herself and maintained a resident representative. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #47 was severely cognitively impaired and required set up assistance with eating. The MDS also identified Resident #47 had not had a significant weight loss/gain. Review of Resident #47's weight summary identified the following: on 7/1/23 Resident #47 weighed 139.1 pounds (lbs), on 8/1/23 Resident #47 weighed 133.7 lbs which was a 5.4 lb/7.6 percent (%) weight loss. A physician order dated 8/9/23 directed to weigh…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #527) who was reviewed for a physical restraint, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from a physical restraint. The findings include: Resident #527's was admitted with diagnoses that included Down Syndrome, Alzheimer's Disease, and diabetes mellitus. The admission Nursing assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #527 was admitted due to psychiatric/behavior/mental health issues and for therapy following a fall. Additionally, Resident #527 had agitation/restlessness and was hyperactive. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #527 had long and short term memory problems and required extensive assistance of 2 staff for bed mobility, transfers, and extensive assistance of 1 staff with toileting. The Resident Care Plan dated 10/25/23 identified Resident #527 had behaviors, was resistive to care, removed clothing in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #527) who was reviewed for a physical restraint, the facility failed to report the allegation of mistreatment to the state agency in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #527's was admitted with diagnoses that included Down Syndrome, Alzheimer's Disease, and diabetes mellitus. The admission Nursing assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #527 was admitted due to psychiatric/behavior/mental health issues and for therapy following a fall. Additionally, Resident #527 had agitation/restlessness and was hyperactive. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #527 had long and short term memory problems and required extensive assistance of 2 staff for bed mobility, transfers, and extensive assistance of 1 staff with toileting. The Resident Care Plan dated 10/25/23 identified Resident #527 had a behavioral problem, was resistive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, observation, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #6, #68 and #527) reviewed for falls, and for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, (Resident #9), the facility failed to update the resident care plan and failed to implement interventions to the resident's care plan. The findings include: 1. Resident #6 's diagnoses included muscle weakness, Alzheimer's disease, and seizures. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 with moderate cognitive impairment for decision making and poor long and short-term memory. Additionally, Resident #6 was dependent on staff for rolling side to side in bed, for lower body dressing, and transfers to and from bed. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/3/23 identified Resident #6 as a fall risk. Interventions included the use of floor mats for safety and encouraging Resident #6 to use the call bell for assistance. A. The Reportable Event dated 10/14/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and observation for the only sampled resident (Resident #23) reviewed for foot care, the facility failed to provide podiatry services. The findings include: Resident #23's was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, total hip arthroplasty, and gout. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #23 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The Resident Care Plan dated 8/25/23 identified Resident #23 was at risk for alterations in comfort. Interventions included assisting resident to a position of comfort. A physician's order dated 8/25/23 directed to consult podiatry as needed. A physician's progress note dated 9/7/23 identified Resident #23's right great toe was swollen. No referral to podiatry was noted in the medical record. Observations and interview on 11/7/23 at 11:27 AM, with Person #2, identified that the toenails of Resident #23 were long…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents #6, 68, & 527) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented, failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a fall, and failed to conduct a risk assessment following falls. The findings include: 1. Resident #6 's diagnoses included muscle weakness, Alzheimer's disease, and seizures. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 with moderate cognitive impairment for decision making and poor long and short term memory. Additionally, Resident #6 was dependent on staff for rolling side to side in bed, for lower body dressing, and transfers to and from bed. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/3/23 identified Resident #6 as a fall risk. Interventions included the use of floor mats for safety and encouraging Resident #6 to use the call bell for assistance. A. The Reportable Event dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-27 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for two (2) of three (3) staff members (NA #1 and #2) reviewed for abuse training, the facility failed to ensure direct care staff completed the annual abuse prohibition training. The findings include: Review of the Vital Learn facility educational training and tracking document identified the following: 1. NA #1 last completed her abuse prohibition training on 9/6/22 (21 days overdue). 2. NA #2 last completed his abuse prohibition training on 4/6/22 (174 days overdue). Interview with the nurse educator on 9/27/23 at 2:00 PM identified she has not completed any abuse prohibition in-services and was unable to provide any documentation of completed in-services. Interview with the Administrator on 9/27/23 at 3:00 PM identified the facility changed their electronic training platform from Vital Learn to Healthdrive around November/December 2022. She identified NA #1 and NA #2 have not completed any courses in Healthdrive. She identified abuse training should be completed annually. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care plans the facility failed to create a care plan and interventions for a resident with identified behavioral concerns. The findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included heart failure and cellulitis. The care plan dated 7/15/23 identified Resident #2 was at risk for falls due to cognitive loss with interventions that included to arrange the resident's environment to enhance vision and maximize independence. A Psychiatric evaluation dated 7/18/23 identified Resident #2's diagnoses included adjustment disorder, depressive episodes and anxiety with confusion and a memory impairment. The evaluation further identified Resident #2 had a chronic psychiatric illness and was stable on his/her current regimen. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had no impairments in cognition, no delusions or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews for 5 of 7 residents (Resident #34, Resident #43, Resident #47, Resident #51 and Resident #54) reviewed for activities of daily living, the facilty failed to ensure timely incontinent care, bathing and failed to offer out of bed assistance to residents. The findings included: 1. Resident #34's diagnoses included cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of precerebral artery, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and dysphagia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified Resident #34 had a moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent with extensive assistance of two-person physical support for transfers. A Resident Care Plan identified Resident #34 required assistance/was dependent for care in bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing, eating, bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, and toileting related to limited mobility. Interventions included to utilize a bed rail as an enabler, provide resident with total assist of two for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, facilty documentation and staff interviews for 5 of 24 sampled residents (Resident #34, Resident #43, Resident #47, Resident #51, and Resident #54) reviewed for timeliness of personal care and meal consumption documentation (Resident #51), the facilty failed to ensure adequate staffing to provide personal care and record meal consumption documentation. The findings included: 1. Resident #34's diagnoses included cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of precerebral artery, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and dysphagia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified Resident #34 had a moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent with extensive assistance of two-person physical support for transfers. A Resident Care Plan identified Resident #34 required assistance/was dependent for care in bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing, eating, bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, and toileting related to limited mobility. Interventions included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #119) reviewed for advanced directives, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were in place to reflect the resident's choice to not have cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed. The findings include: Resident #119's was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic pain, rheumatoid arthritis, spinal stenosis and cervical disc degeneration. The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] at 12:36 PM identified Resident #119 was alert and oriented to time, person, place and situation but lacked documentation regarding advanced directives/code status. A physician's undated admission History and Physical identified Resident #119 as a Full Code (perform CPR). A Resident Care Plan dated [DATE] identified a problem with requiring assistance with activities of daily living. Interventions included to utilize bed rails as an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record and staff interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure resident identification was verified prior to administering medications. The findings included: Resident #15's diagnoses that included dementia, with behavioral disturbance, depression, and a long-term degenerative disorder of the central nervous system. A quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified Resident #15 had a moderate cognitive impairment. Physician's order dated 7/1/21 directed to administer Aspirin 81 mg by mouth daily, Calcium 600 plus D Tablet-600-400 mg-Unit 1 tab by mouth daily, Cymbalta 60 mg by mouth daily, Gabapentin 300 mg by mouth daily, Metoprolol Tartrate 12.5 mg by mouth two times daily, Sennosides-Docusate Sodium 7.6-50 mg 2 tablets by mouth two times daily, Zyrtec 10 mg by mouth daily, and Miralax 17 gm by mouth daily. Observation of medication administration with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #67) reviewed for position/mobility, the facility failed to apply splints per physician orders. The findings include: Resident #67 diagnoses included hydrocephalus, acute respiratory failure requiring tracheostomy, intracranial injury with loss of consciousness, traumatic brain injury and seizures. An Occupational Therapy discharge recommendation dated 4/1/21 directed for Resident #67 to don bilateral elbow splints during AM care and doff during PM care. Physician's order dated 5/18/21 directed for Resident #67 to wear bilateral elbow splints during the day, check skin pre/post application. A Resident Care Plan dated 6/11/21 identified Resident #67 was dependent for care in bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing, bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, and toileting related to impaired mobility due to intracranial injury. Interventions included to don…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #51) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure weights were obtained per physicians order, failed to consistently document meal intake and failed to report a significant weight loss to the Dietician timely. The findings included: Resident #51's diagnosis included dementia, adult failure to thrive, dysphagia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and anxiety. An Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) progress note dated 2/8/21 identified Resident #51 reported loose stools and a lack of appetite at baseline. a. A nutrition assessment completed by the Dietician and dated 2/23/21 identified Resident #51 had a stable weight of 92.4 pounds, declined a house supplement, a family member provided an Ensure supplement and Resident #51 drank 8 ounces per day. Additionally, the nutritional assessment noted that meals alone did not meet Resident #51's nutritional needs and supplements were needed to meet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility's documentation, review of facility's policy and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #67) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to change oxygen tubing per physician orders. The findings include: Resident #67's diagnoses included hydrocephalus, acute respiratory failure requiring tracheostomy, intracranial injury with loss of consciousness, traumatic brain injury and seizures. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #67 had a problem with short/long term memory and required total assistance of 2 for bed mobility. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #67 required total assistance with 1 for dressing, eating, toilet use, personal hygiene and utilized oxygen. A Resident Care Plan dated 9/14/20 and currently in effect identified Resident #67 was at risk for respiratory complications related to having a tracheostomy. Interventions included to keep the head of bed at 30 degrees, monitor and report oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of the facility policy, review of the clinical record and staff interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to sanitize the glucometer machine per facility's policy and manufacturer's recommendations. The findings included: Observation and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 on 7/12/21 at 11:20 AM identified she utilized a Clorox Healthcare Bleach Germicidal and Disinfectant cloth to wipe down the Evencare G2 glucometer before entering Resident #7's room to complete his/her blood glucose test. LPN #3 wiped the glucometer using a Clorox Healthcare Bleach Germicidal and Disinfectant wipe by making contact to all areas of the glucometer with the wipe, disposing of the wipe and then placing the machine on a clean tissue located on top of the medication cart. LPN #3 identified that 30 seconds would be needed to complete disinfection of the glucometer and that 30 seconds had elapsed from the time of her wiping the glucometer and the time it took the glucometer to air dry. Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-11-13 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #21) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to provide notice to the Ombudsman regarding resident transfers to the hospital. The findings include: Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and diagnoses that included heart failure, anemia, and dementia. A Nursing Change in Condition Evaluation dated 9/25/22 noted Resident #21 had an elevated temperature and a change in vital signs. Resident #21 was transferred to the emergency room (ER) upon physician order and was admitted to the hospital. Resident #21 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An electronic physician's order dated 12/1/22 at 8:35 AM directed Resident #21 be sent to the ER for evaluation following a fall with a head injury. Resident #21 was admitted to the hospital and returned to the facility on [DATE]. An electronic physician's order dated 12/24/22 at 8:10 PM directed Resident #21 be sent to the ER for further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-11-13 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, staff interview, and review of facility policy for one sampled resident (Resident #21) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to provide the required notification of bed hold policy. The findings include: Resident # 21's diagnoses included heart failure, anemia, and dementia. Review of Face Sheet documentation in the clinical record identified Person #3 was the resident representative for Resident #21. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #21 was moderately cognitively impaired, required supervision from staff for transferring and walking, and required extensive assistance of one for dressing and personal hygiene. Review of a census list provided by the Business Office Manager (BOM), dated 11/7/23 at 11:03 AM, identified Resident #21 was transferred to the emergency room (ER) and admitted to the hospital on : 9/25/22 and returned to facility on 10/18/22, 12/1/22 and returned to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,593 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-09-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Crystal SpringsElkins, WV 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glen BurnieGlen Burnie, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At HomewoodBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Long GreenBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at GreenfieldMilwaukee, WI 1 of 5Nella's At Autumn Lake HealthcareElkins, WV 2 of 5Ashbrook Care & Rehabilitation CenterScotch Plains, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Arlington WestBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Ballenger CreekFrederick, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Baltimore WashingtonGlen Burnie, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At BridgeparkBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At CatonsvilleCatonsville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glade ValleyWalkersville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Loch RavenBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Memorial BridgePenns Grove, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At NorwalkNorwalk, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At OverleaBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At PikesvillePikesville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RuxtonTowson, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Salem CountySalem, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At SouthgateCarneys Point, NJ 2 of 5King David Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBaltimore, MD 2 of 5The Subacute At Autumn Lake HealthcareVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Alice ManorBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Calvert ManorRising Sun, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chesapeake WoodsCambridge, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chevy ChaseChevy Chase, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Patuxent RiverLaurel, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Perring ParkwayBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RiverviewEssex, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Silver SpringSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Spa CreekAnnapolis, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Summit ParkCatonsville, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VinelandVineland, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VoorheesVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At West HartfordWest Hartford, CT 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare Post-Acute Care CenterBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at BeloitBeloit, WI 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at OceanviewOcean View, NJ 3 of 5Cornell Hall Care & Rehabilitation CenterUnion, NJ

Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
KC DERBY CT AL OPCO JV LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/28/2023
AUT CT7 HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 11/28/2023
SCHWARTZ, MARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2023
GRIFFIN, GIOVANNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/26/2024
ZUMPANO, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 11%Other / private 22%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$345per resident / day
operating cost
$10,482per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$388per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Connecticut
$15,208/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,118/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075405. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next