Autumn Lake Healthcare At Perring Parkway
1801 Wentworth Road, Baltimore, MD 21234 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 125 certified beds · (410) 661-5717 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $32,383 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-22)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.7% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.0% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.1% | 22.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 27.7% | 22.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.5% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 5.9% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.6% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.6% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.4% | 80.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.8% | 21.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.7% | 9.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.79 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.76 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 178 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 69.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.5%CMS range 51.3–65.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.2%CMS range 9.6–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 69.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 58.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.4%CMS range 3.0–8.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 100.2 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
65 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to identify and consistently evaluate the contributing factors to a resident fall and ensure appropriate interventions were implemented to prevent future occurrences. This was evident for 1 of 2 (#6) residents reviewed for falls and resulted in harm to Resident #6. The findings include:Care plan - is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Person-centered care: means to focus on the resident as the locus of control and support the resident in making their own choices and having control over their daily lives.The medical record for Resident #6 was reviewed on 6/16/26 at 8:21 AM regarding complaint 303105, that Resident #6 had repeated falls without interventions and was hospitalized multiple times.A review of the hospital discharge summary from 5/18/26 prior to this initial admission, documented that it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and medical record reviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) ensure a resident received proper care to prevent the removal of a skin graft which led to the failure of the skin graft procedure and caused harm to Resident #94 by prolonging healing of the wound; 2) administer insulin before meals as ordered and failed to follow the hypoglycemia protocol as ordered which led to harm for Resident #91 when the low glucose incident required Resident #91 to be transferred to the hospital Intensive Care Unit for care; 3) provide wound care to a resident who had a surgical wound (Resident #84). This was evident for 3 of 45 residents selected for review during the survey. The findings include: 1. On 12/15/23 at 1 PM medical record review revealed a hospital discharge summary for Resident #94. On 2/2/22, Resident #94 had excision of right heel and on 2/7/22, placement of bilayer integra skin graft and wound vac with the following discharged orders from the hospital: incision/wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain the facility in a homelike environment. This was evident for 3 of 3 observations of unit 1 and unit 2. The findings include: 1. On 6/16/26 at 7:05 AM the following observations were made on station 2 nursing unit: Inside room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a trashcan on the left that had a pair of discarded gloves lying beside the trashcan. There were pieces of food scattered in the hallway throughout the unit and beside the facility's sign in the lobby area near the elevator. There was a discarded mask in the hallway sitting on top of a personal protective equipment cart. There was a kitchenette with double doors, that were open and across the hallway was a napkin, straw papers and crumbs scattered in front of resident's room doors. To the right of the kitchen doors was a cart that had dirty dishes piled on it. There were 2 linen carts in the hallway with blue covers. On top of the covers were items such as briefs and an open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure that a resident was treated with dignity. This was evident for 1 (#5) of 3 residents observed during the complaint survey,The findings include:An observation of Resident #5 on 6/17/26 at 1:23 PM revealed the resident was in a hospital gown. A review of complaint #3034879, regarding Resident #5, on 6/16/26 at 10:40 AM revealed the complainant alleged the resident was not receiving assistance with his/her personal care needs. On 6/17/26 at 1:24 PM the certified nursing assistant (Aid) #22, who was assigned to Resident #5 the day of the observation, was interviewed. She reported that she had given the resident a bed bath, mouth care, and applied lotion on his/her skin. When asked if the resident had family who provided clothes for him/her, Aid #22 reported that the resident had clothes. However, she reported there was no reason she had not assisted the resident to dress in their clothes instead of a hospital gown.The concerns were reviewed with the Director of Nursing (DON) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure residents/resident representatives had the right to a grievance process. This was evident for 1 (#1) of 6 residents reviewed for complaints. The findings include:On 6/17/26 at 12:00 PM a review of the facility's policy titled, Resident and Family Grievances dated 12/23/22 with the last review on 11/3/25 revealed they failed to enter the name and title of the grievance officer and contact information as indicated on the policy. The policy stated that a resident or family member may voice grievances with respect to care and treatment and other concerns regarding their stay at the facility. In addition, it was noted that a person may use the following forum to voice a grievance verbal complaint to a staff member or grievance official. The staff member receiving the grievance will record the nature and specifics of the grievance on the designated grievance form or assist the resident or family member to complete the form. Then forward the grievance form to the grievance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that allegations of abuse were reported to the State Agency within the required timeframe. This was evident for 4 of 4 abuse allegations reported to staff for Resident #3. The findings include:1) On 6/16/26 at 10:08 AM a review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy dated 11/13/23 and last reviewed on 10/17/25 revealed in section VII (7) titled, Reporting/Response that staff were to report all allegations of abuse to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and to the State Agency (SA). A review of the facility's investigation file for the facility reported incident #2982477 on 6/17/26 at 9:23 AM revealed the facility documented that they became aware of the allegation of abuse on 4/13/26 at 3:00 PM when another family member of the resident reported it to the NHA. Further review revealed that Certified Nursing Assistant II (Aid) #10 wrote in her statement that Resident #3 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that all allegations of abuse were investigated and appropriate interventions put into place to ensure resident were free of abuse. This was evident for 3 of 4 allegations of abuse reported regarding Resident #3.The findings include:A medical record review for Resident #3 revealed a progress note that the resident's representative wanted the resident discharged on 6/2/26. Based on another progress note written by Nurse Practitioner (NP) #24 on 6/2/26 revealed the resident was supposed to discharge on [DATE]. Upon review of complaint #3034284 dated 6/4/26, Resident #3 was taken to the local hospital emergency department (ED) and there was an allegation that the resident was abused at the facility. On 6/16/26 at 1:34 PM a review of the hospital records for the ED visit on 6/2/26 revealed photos of bruising on both sides of Resident #3's neck, a bruise to the right knee, and a bruise on the elbow.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that residents were appropriately discharged from the facility. This was evident for 1 (#3) of 1 discharge reviewed. The findings include:MDS (Minimum Data Set) - is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. Care plan - Care plan - is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Person-centered care: means to focus on the resident as the locus of control and support the resident in making their own choices and having control over their daily lives. A paper record review for Resident #3 on 6/16/26 at 1:11 PM revealed 2 provider certifications dated 2/25/26 and 3/3/26 deeming the resident incapable of making decisions due to the diagnosis of dementia. An electronic medical record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code a residents' active diagnosis and skin conditions on the minimum data set (MDS). This was determined during the review of complaints related to general care in 2 of 4 residents (#6 and #7). The findings included: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure that each resident receives the care they need.1. The medical record for Resident #6 was reviewed on 6/17/26 at 1:32 PM. The comprehensive assessment completed on 5/18/26 and the active diagnosis entered in section 'I' stated that the active diagnosis entered in the comprehensive assessment for 5/18/26 documented that Resident #6 had or was treated within the past 7 days with cancer. A comprehensive review of the medical record including the hospital discharge, failed to note any active treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the residents with a quality of care and dignity by timely responding to call bells and providing residents with the appropriate adult incontinence briefs. This was evident during random observations and 1 of 1 resident (#6) observed for the use of incontinence briefs. The findings include: 1. During the entrance and initial general observations conducted on 6/16/26 at 7:00 AM, this surveyor walked past room [ROOM NUMBER], heard and saw the call bell going off. A staff member was seen walking in the opposite direction towards the surveyor. This individual proceeded to go past this surveyor, past the call bell still alarming and proceeded pushed the button for the elevator. This surveyor continued down the hall and the 2nd floor nursing station was visualized to the left with 5 staff all seated around the nurses station. The call bell panel was observed up on the wall and there were 3 call bells that were presently lit up on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the physicians failed to have their signed notes in the medical record timely after seeing the resident and ensure their notes were individualized and reflected the status of the resident. This was evident 1 of 2 (Resident #7) residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 on 6/18/26 at 10:29 AM revealed attending notes completed by attending #21 completed on 5/20, a history and physical, 6/1 and 6/17.All 3 notes contained the same information. On 5/31/26 Resident #7 sustained a fall and acquired requiring hospitalization where it was noted that s/he acquired a subdural hematoma. The 6/1/26 readmission note stated that Resident #7 had 'no acute injury.' To plan for 24/7 supervision. Attending #21 was interviewed on 6/18/26 at 11:11 AM. Her notes, their contents and the resident status at the time the notes were written were reviewed with her as she concurrently reviewed her notes. She stated that she was aware of the incident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment. This was evident for 2 of 2 facility floors of the building during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: During surveyor initial tour of the facility, upon entering the facility's lobby area on 11/24/2025 at 7:30AM, and again at 7:48AM surveyors noted a malodorous smell was present. Carpeting present within 2 out of 2 of the facility's floors was observed to be in worn condition with areas of the carpet's pattern no longer visible as compared to smaller adjacent areas. Surveyors observed dark grey areas and staining and debris present within the carpeting material. On 11/26/2025 at approximately 11:30AM the survey team noted a malodorous smell was present in the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 11/26/2025 at 11:40AM a malodorous smell was found by the surveyor to be present in the hallway near the elevator on the first floor of the facility. On 11/26/2025 at 12:40PM the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 53 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for Resident #24. This was evident for 1 out of 1 Resident (#24) reviewed for dignity during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: During the surveyor's initial tour of the facility on 11/24/2025 at 8:08AM Resident #24 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in the resident hallway outside of their room with bare feet on the hallway floor and multiple orange stains were observed on the t-shirt they were wearing. On 11/25/2025 at 8:50AM the surveyor observed Resident #24 sitting in their wheelchair in the resident hallway outside of their room wearing the same t-shirt with the same stains on it which was observed by the surveyor the day prior. On 11/25/2025 at 9:05AM the surveyor requested and performed a dual surveyor observation with the facility's Administrator of Resident #24. At this time Resident #24 was observed from the hallway laying in their bed exposed with no clothing on from the waist down. At this time, the surveyor shared the concern with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to formulate an Advanced Directive and maintain accurate documentation within their medical record. This was evident for 4 (Resident #2, #5, #64, and #57) out of 6 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives during the survey.The findings include: Advance directive is a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law (whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the State), relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated. It is a legal document outlining future healthcare wishes and appointing a healthcare agent. Maryland Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) is a form which includes medical orders for emergency medical services or other medical personnel regarding CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and other life-sustaining treatment options. It is a state specific medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan was thoroughly completed and included the resident -specific initial goals based on admission orders needed to properly care for the resident immediately upon their admission. This was evident for 1(Resident #99) out of 4 residents reviewed for care planning during the annual survey.The findings include: The facility must develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for each resident immediately upon their admission, which would address resident-specific health and safety concerns to prevent decline or injury with the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident and meet professional standards of quality care.On 11/24/2025 at 8:36AM, during a tour of Station 1, the Surveyor observed Resident #99 in their room lying awake in bed. The Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were offered the opportunity to participate in their care planning process by holding timely quarterly care plan meetings. This was evident for 2 (Resident #31 and Resident #57) out of 4 residents reviewed for care planning during the annual survey. The findings include:A care plan is used to summarize a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments and outlines what needs to be done to plan, assess, and manage care. Care plans are developed, reviewed, and/or revised by the IDT after the completion of a comprehensive MDS assessment (Admission, Annual, Quarterly, Significant Change) to help to evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care while in the facility.The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a standardized, comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status to develop a plan of care based on the resident's individualized needs.On 11/25/2025 at 10:20AM, an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was offered the opportunity to participate in facility sponsored group activities. This was evident for 1 (Resident #54) out of 2 residents reviewed for activities during the annual survey.The findings include:On 11/24/2025 at 12:00PM, during an interview conducted with the resident representative, the Surveyor was informed that Resident #54 was provided with coloring activities in their room but has not observed facility staff offer to take the resident to group activities or observed the resident at group activities. The resident representative stated that that would be nice for the resident to get out of their room and go to group activities because they would really enjoy it. The resident uses a wheelchair and would need staff assistance with transportation around the facility.On 11/25/2025 at 12:30PM, during a review of Resident #54's electronic medical record, the Surveyor discovered that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's dry skin condition was identified and failed to ensure they received intervention to address the condition. This was evident for 1 out of 1 Resident (#24) reviewed for skin conditions during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: During the surveyor's initial tour on 11/24/2025 at 8:08 AM Resident #24 was observed in their wheelchair in the hallway with no socks or shoes and the surveyor noted the resident's lower extremities appeared to have very dry skin with visible flaking present. On 11/24/2025 at 11:37AM the surveyor observed Resident #24 laying in their bed and noted they continued to have very dry visibly flaky skin on both lower extremities. Review of Resident #24's medical record by the surveyor on 11/25/2025 at 9:41AM revealed there was no documentation present for the Resident's dry flaky skin on their lower extremities having been identified or addressed. Review of Resident #24's diagnoses revealed they had a diagnosis of lymphedema. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with the resident and the staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident receives proper treatment and scheduled follow-up appointments to maintain vision. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #57) reviewed for vision services during the annual survey.The findings include:On 11/24/2025 at 11:30AM, during an interview with Resident #57, the Surveyor was informed that Resident #57 had cataract surgery on the right eye and was supposed to have cataract surgery on the left eye, but the facility never scheduled the surgery.On 11/24/2025 at 1:26PM, a review of Resident #57's electronic medical record revealed an eye care group note dated 4/22/2024 with a completed assessment that included Cataract, mixed; Bothersome; Both eyes; VA stable, but patient is not satisfied with level of vision and a plan in which Cataract surgery recommended; ophthalmology consult; Follow-up: 4-5 months; Referral: Ophthalmology consult; Please schedule an appointment for this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure consistent incontinence care was provided. This was evident for 1 out of 1 Resident (#4) reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: During the surveyor's initial tour of the facility on 11/24/25 at 8:05AM Resident #4 was observed in their bed wearing a visibly wet, yellow incontinence care product. Review of Resident #4's medical record by the surveyor on 11/24/2025 at 10:42AM revealed Resident was documented consistently by various nursing staff on the Task Documentation Survey Report throughout the month of November 2025 as having total dependence upon staff for toileting needs for incontinence of bowel and bladder. Surveyor review on 12/01/2025 at 11:31AM of Resident #4's incontinence care documentation in the medical record revealed that incontinence care was documented as being provided on the following dates and times: 11/28/25 at 12:35AM and 7:34PM, 11/29/25 at 1:05AM, 9:08AM, and 7:09PM, 11/30/25 at 1:53PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to: 1.) ensure respiratory tubing and the humidification saline bottle was dated and timed in accordance with professional standards and ensure a respiratory nebulizer machine, face mask, tubing and saline bottle was stored off of the floor's surface. This was evident for 2 out of 2 Residents (#98, #10) reviewed for respiratory during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include:1.) On 11/24/2025 at 8:09AM the surveyor observed Resident #98 wearing their nasal cannula oxygen tubing which had no label indicating date or time of when it was placed or would expire. On 11/24/2025 at 8:09AM the surveyor observed Resident #98's humidification bottle for their oxygen with no labeling indicating date or time of when it was placed or when it would expire.On 11/24/2025 at 8:09AM the surveyor observed Resident #98's nebulizer machine and face mask directly laying on the floor's surface next to their bed. On 11/24/2025 at 8:10AM the surveyor requested a dual observation of the concerns with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an appropriate storage method was implemented for medications awaiting final disposition consistent with standards of practice. This was evident for an observation in 1 medication room (Station 2) out of 2 medication rooms observed during the annual survey. The findings include:Disposition is the process of returning and/or destroying unused medications. On 11/26/2025 at 7:49AM, an observation of the medication room on Station 2 revealed a medication bottle of levetiracetam oral solution for Resident #79 and a white paper bag with a ONETOUCH Ultra 2 device, strips, and lancets for Resident #100. On 11/26/2025 at 9:45AM, a review of Resident #79's electronic medical record revealed that levetiracetam oral solution was discontinued on 11/20/2025. A review of Resident #100's electronic medical record revealed that the resident was discharged on 10/14/2025. On 11/26/2025 at 10:53AM, the Surveyor conducted an interview with Unit Manager #17 in Station 2's medication room. The Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews with the resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to assist the resident in obtaining routine dental care. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #57) reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:On 11/24/2025 at 11:30AM, during an interview with Resident #57, the Surveyor was informed that the resident has not been examined by a dentist in a long time and has been requesting to see a dentist for routine services related to existing dentition and general oral hygiene.During a review of Resident #57's electronic medical record on 11/24/2025 at 1:30PM, the Surveyor discovered a dental consult note dated 2/16/2024, which was the last documentation of dental services provided to the resident. Further review failed to reveal documentation of any scheduled routine appointments.On 11/26/2025 at 1:20PM during an interview conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) #21, the Surveyor was informed that Resident #57 had requested to see the dentist.On 11/26/2025 at 2:00PM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and resident medical record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a diet that meets the residents special dietary needs and taking consideration of the resident's preferences. This was evident for 1(Resident #8) out of 6 residents reviewed and observed during the annual survey. The findings include the following: During observational rounds and interview on 11/242025 at 8:45 AM Resident #8 stated, I am not allergic to beef and on my meal ticket it says I am allergic to beef. I was also supposed to get bacon and Oatmeal Cereal for breakfast but there is no bacon on my plate and there is no Oatmeal Cereal. We never get drinks with our meals, and I want my coffee with my breakfast. They bring it too late, not at all and I am either done with my food or if I wait for them to bring it to me, my food is cold. Resident #8 meal tray was found to have scrambled eggs, 2 sausage patties, 1 piece of white toast with no juice, no coffee, no tea, and no Oatmeal Cereal. Resident #8 meal ticket dated 11/24/2025 Breakfast that was present on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility documentation and interviews and it was determined the facility failed to follow the menu for residents' meals. This was evident for 2 (Resident #8 and #58) out of 6 residents reviewed during the survey.The findings include the following: During observational rounds and interview on 11/242025 at 8:45 AM Resident #8 stated, I was also supposed to get bacon and Oatmeal Cereal for breakfast but there is no bacon on my plate and there is no Oatmeal Cereal. We never get drinks with our meals, and I want my coffee with my breakfast. They bring it too late, not at all and I am either done with my food or if I wait for them to bring it to me, my food is cold. Resident #8's meal tray was found to have scrambled eggs, 2 sausage patties, 1 piece of white toast with no juice, no coffee, no tea, and no Oatmeal Cereal. Resident #8 meal ticket dated 11/24/2025 for Breakfast, that was present on his/her meal tray, stated that resident was to receive 4 slices of bacon, 12 oz of Oatmeal Cereal, 12 oz of Coffee or Hot tea, 8 oz of Orange Juice. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to 1.) ensure a resident admitted with severe cognitive impairment had two physician certifications completed and in the medical record, and failed to ensure the MOLST form reflected surrogacy as the basis of the orders and failed to ensure physician documentation of advanced directives and the molst form being reviewed was present in the medical record, and 2.) failed to ensure accuracy of a documented indication for use of a medication in a medical order. This was evident for: 1.) 1 out of 5 Residents (#10) reviewed for advanced directives, and 2.) 1 out of 1 Resident (#24) reviewed for skin conditions during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented for residents. This was evident for 1 out of 5 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for advanced directives, and 1 out of 1 resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure tube feeding equipment was properly dated to prevent potential infection control risks. This deficient practice was evident for 1 (Resident #9) of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding.The findings include:On 11/24/2025 at 10:27 AM, Resident #9 was observed to be using a tube feeding that was not dated. Staff #10, who was assigned to Resident #9, was located and confirmed that the tubing and nutrition bottle were undated. Staff #10 stated it was the responsibility of the nurse to ensure the tube feeding equipment was dated. On 11/25/2025 at 10:48 AM, the Director of Nursing was made aware of the findings.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to develop, implement, and update a person-centered care plan for each resident to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs. This was evident for 4 residents (#32, #80, #76, #14) out of 15 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include the following: 1) Review of Resident #32's medical record on 12/15/2023 at 2:00 PM revealed a revised care plan dated 11/08/2023 with a focus for Resident (#32) being at risk for changes related to resident's current psychological diagnoses. The care plan further states under Interventions/Tasks, for staff to administer medications as ordered and to observe for side effects but there was no resident centered or specific side effects that staff should be monitoring resident for noted on the care plan related to antipsychotic medications. Further review of Resident #32's medical record revealed a Pharmacy Consultation Report dated 11/08/2023 that Resident (#32) receives Quetiapine, an antipsychotic medication, and should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary drugs due to inadequate monitoring. This was evident for 5 residents (#32, #14, #70, #18, #44) out of 13 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include the following: 1) Review of resident (#32)'s medical record on 12/13/2023 at 10:44 AM revealed a Pharmacy Consultation Report dated 11/08/2023 that resident (#32) receives Quetiapine, an antipsychotic medication, and the resident should be monitored for involuntary movements including tardive dyskinesia as well as the facility interdisciplinary team ensures on-going monitoring for effectiveness and potential irreversible consequences (e.g., uncontrolled movements). Further review of the medical record failed to reveal evidence that the facility performed an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) test to resident (#32) at time of admission. Review of facility policy, Use of Psychotropic Medication on 12/13/2023 at 11:15 AM stated that residents who receive an antipsychotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the resident electronic medical record and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to provide the resident and/or responsible party a written copy of the hospital transfer summary. This was found to be evident during the facility's Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: Resident # 43 was admitted to the facility with the following but not limited diagnosis: Dementia. Review of the resident electronic medical record on 12/12/23 at 9:23 AM revealed that on 8/19/23 Resident # 43 was sent to the hospital. On November 4, 2023, Resident #43 had a fall, and was assessed to have no injury at the time of the fall. The next day on 11/5/23 the resident complained of pain and an order was given to send the resident out to the hospital for evaluation. The survey team requested a copy of the transfer summary form that was sent to the family regarding the resident hospitalizations. An interview was conducted with the DON on 12/19/23 at 1:00 PM and she stated that she was unable to provide a transfer summary form that was sent to Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure its residents had a complete and accurate Preadmission Screening and Record Review (PASRR). This was evident for 1 out 45 of residents (Resident #47) in the survey sample. The findings are: The PASRR level 1 screening is federally mandated and must be completed for all applicants to nursing facilities which participate in the Maryland Medical Assistance Program regardless of an applicant's payment source. The purpose of the screening is to help ensure that residents are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. The program assists in the placement and provision of services for individuals with severe mental illness and/or intellectual disability. A review of Resident #47's medical record on 12/18/23 at 11:15 AM revealed the resident had a PASRR which was done in the hospital on 2/23/23. Review of Section C.1 Serious Mental Illness Diagnosis. Does the individual have a major mental disorder? If yes, list the diagnosis. The item was left blank and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide the resident and their representative with a written summary of the baseline care plan within 48 hours of the resident's admission. This was evident for 1 resident (#32) out of 8 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record on 12/14/2023 at 11:20 AM revealed that there was no written summary of Resident #32's baseline care plan given to the resident #32's representative within 48 hours of admission. During an interview on 12/14/2023 at 11:45 AM the Director of Nursing stated that there are no care plans given out and the facility does not provide written summaries of care plans to residents or their representatives. During an interview on 12/15/2023 at 09:25 AM staff member (#9) stated the facility does not provide any form of summaries of care plans to residents or their representatives, but the facility will be doing this moving forward.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to update a resident's care plan who had a wound and a resident with a history of falls. This was evident in 3 (#84, #36, #70) residents out of 8 resident records reviewed for updated care plans during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 12/20/23 at 10:41 am a review of Resident #84's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was receiving wound care to the surgical site located to the right stump. Further review of the resident's care plan revealed the resident's care plan was not updated to include the ordered wound care. Also, the care plan indicated that the resident was at risk for an alteration in skin integrity and the resident's skin would remain intact. On 12/20/23 at 12:30 pm during an interview with Director of Nursing (DON) #2, he/she stated, the unit managers complete the care plans and update the care plans. The care plans should be updated when there are changes and quarterly. DON #2 stated, the care plan should have been updated to reflect the resident's wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the resident medical record and interviews with the facility staff it was determined the facility failed to properly assess a resident for bedrails. This was found to be evident for 1(Resident # 14) of 7 residents reviewed for accidents during the facility's survey. The findings include: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility with the following but not limited diagnoses: Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, and Anxiety Disorder. Review of the facility's matrix (used to identify pertinent care categories for residents) on 12/11/23 at 4:05 PM revealed the resident had a fall with major injury (MI). Review of the resident 11/7/23's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, (a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs) revealed Section J1900: Number of falls since admission/entry or reentry: A-No Injury =Two or more B-Injury (except major) = None C- Major Injury = None An interview was conducted with the DON and Administrator on 12/14/23 at 10:30 AM and she stated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician and nurse practitioners accurately assessed a resident's medications (Resident #91) and wound dressing instructions (Residents #94). This was found to be evident for 2 out of 45 residents reviewed during an the survey. The findings include: 1. On 12/22/23 at 7am a review of Resident #91's medical record revealed the resident was admitted in the facility in July 2023 with diagnosis including but not limited type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the discharge summary from the hospital included instructions to continue HumuLIN R U-500 KwikPen Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 500 UNIT/ML (Insulin Regular) Inject 80 unit subcutaneously three times a day before meals for DM. Humulin® (HUE-mu-[NAME]) R U-500 (500 units/mL) is for adults and children who need more than 200 units of insulin in a day to control high blood sugar for their diabetes mellitus. It is more concentrated than Humulin R U-100. It has 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and observations the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that assured accurate dispensing and administering of medications to meets the needs of each resident. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 287) reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 12/12/23 at 08:15 AM the surveyor initiated a medication administration observation with LPN #11. During the observation the surveyor was informed by LPN #11 that the Aspart insulin pen for Resident #287 was not present in the medication cart. LPN #11 checked the medication room behind the nurses' station and then called the pharmacy to request Resident # 287's insulin pen as well. A review of the order summary report on 12/1/23 at 08:40 AM revealed that Resident #287 was prescribed on 12/9/23 and the order instructed the clinical staff to administer the Aspart insulin on 12/10/23 at 07:00 AM. The prescriber also ordered that the Aspart injection solution 100 units/ml be administered subcutaneously at 07:00AM, 11:00AM, and at 5 PM before meals. On 12/12/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility pharmacist failed to identify and report irregularities in resident (#70's) drug regimen to the Physician, facility's Medical Director and/or the Director of nursing. This was evident for 1of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #70 on 12/13/23 at 2:21pm revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Anxiety, Depression, and insomnia. A review of the physician orders on 12/13/23 at 3pm revealed the resident is receiving the following: Trazodone HCl Oral Tablet 50 MG (milligrams)by mouth at bedtime for insomnia. (Trazadone is an antidepressant medicine. It's used to treat depression, anxiety, or insomnia.) Melatonin 3 MG by mouth one time a day at 6pm for insomnia. (Melatonin is a hormone that may provide some relief from insomnia.) Sertraline HCl (Zoloft) Oral Tablet 100 MG once a day for depression. (Sertraline is used to treat depression, anxiety disorder.) Pharmacy reviews dated 9/5/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. This was evident for 2 of 25 opportunities for medication errors with an error percentage of 7.14% observed during the medication administration facility task performed. The findings included: On 12/12/23 at 08:15 AM the surveyor initiated a medication administration observation with LPN #11. During the observation the surveyor was informed by LPN #11 that the Aspart insulin pen for Resident #287 was not present in the medication cart. LPN #11 checked the medication room behind the nurses' station and then called the pharmacy to request Resident # 287's insulin pen as well. A review of the prescriber order summary report on 12/12/23 at 08:40 AM was completed by the surveyor. The medical record review revealed that Resident #287's prescriber wrote on 12/9/23 that the resident was to receive Aspart insulin beginning on 12/10/23 at 07:00 AM. The prescriber also ordered that the Aspart injection solution 100 units/ml be administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to administer prescribed mediation to residents. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 45 (Resident #94, #287) reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. An investigation of complaint MD00175452 revealed that Resident #94 was not receiving an antibiotic because they were not available for 3 days. A medical record review on 12/20/23 at 11:00 AM, revealed that Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], from an acute care facility with a diagnosis of osteomyelitis right ankle and foot. Further record review revealed a physician order on 2/18/22: Meropenem-Sodium Chloride Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 1 GM/50ML (Meropenem & Sodium Chloride) every 8 hours for wound infection. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2023 and Nursing Progress notes, revealed that the medication was not available on 2/18, 2/19, and 2/20/22. On 12/18/23 at 7:53 AM, an interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to accurately maintain resident face sheet/Emergency Data sheet with diagnoses that reflected his/her condition. This was evident for 1 resident (#32) out of 8 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include the following: Review of resident (#32)'s medical record on 12/13/2023 at 12:29 PM revealed a progress note written by a nurse practitioner that resident (#32) had a diagnosis of Anxiety. The diagnosis Anxiety was not found on resident (#32)'s face sheet/Emergency Data sheet/Resident Information Sheet. During an interview on 12/13/2023 at 01:15 PM the Director of Nursing stated she was not sure why resident (#32) did not have the diagnosis Anxiety in the system, but it should be added.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews of the residents and facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the resident's call system was functioning properly. This was found to be evident for 1 of multiple resident rooms observed during the facility's survey. The findings include, An observation was made on 12/11/23 at 11:28 AM while on the unit. The resident in bed by the window (A Bed) Resident # 46 called out for help. Two surveyors entered the resident room and checked to see if the resident call light was working. The resident stated that s/he had been pressing the button, but it was not working. One surveyor remained at the resident bedside and tested the resident call light while the other surveyor stood at the resident doorway entrance and observed that the dome light above the door did not light up. The two surveyors then walked to the nurse station to alert staff # 6 of the concern that the resident call light did not light up. Staff # 6 immediately went into the resident room to check the call light and upon pressing the light, it lit up on the wall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the physican of a heart rate below the set parameter as ordered for Resident (#68), failed to notify the physician of a weight gain for Resident (#234) and failed to notify the Power of Attorney (POA)/or emergency contact of changes in condition for Resident (#68 and #233) and the facility staff failed to notify a resident's physician of a positive ultrasound result timely manner for Resident (#21). This was evident for 4 of 4 residents selected for change in condition investigation during the annual survey process and 4 of 39 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: A power of attorney (POA) is a written authorization to represent or act on another's behalf in private affairs, business, or some other legal matter. A Power of Attorney form allows the resident to appoint another person to act on their behalf should they ever require someone to make short- or long-term decisions for the resident. The Emergency Contact is the person you would like…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-05 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide the resident and their representative with a written notice of bed hold policy, at the time of the resident transfer for hospitalization. This was evident for 3 (#38, #58, #59) of 8 residents reviewed for Hospitalization during an annual recertification survey and 3 of 39 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 6/22/18. There was no documentation found in the medical record that the resident or the resident's responsible party was given a copy of the bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 11/30/18. There was no documentation found in the medical record that the resident or the resident's responsible party was given a copy of the bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital. 3. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-05 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and employee record review (Staff #8), it was determined that the facility failed to complete the required performance review of a geriatric nursing assistant at least once every 12 months in 1 employee record reviewed during this survey. The findings included: Performance appraisals are completed at least every 12 months to identify in-service education needed for each geriatric nursing assistant. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 1-31-19 at 9:00 AM confirmed a performance appraisal had not been completed for Staff #8 for 2 years, 2017 and 2018. This surveyor interviewed the Nurse educator on 2/5/19 at 9:25 AM. She said competency trainings were stopped in November of 2018 secondary to her being sick, but they will resume in March of 2019. The education files of four geriatric nursing assistants (GNA's) were reviewed to verify that competencies were reviewed on an annual basis. Staff #5 was hired on 3/25/85 but did not have an annual performance review in 2018. Staff #6 was hired on 11/24/15 but did not have an annual performance review in 2018.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews of facility staff, it was determined that food service employees failed to ensure that sanitary practices were followed, equipment was maintained and safe food handling practices were followed to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 1/29/19 at 9:01 AM, an initial tour of the facility kitchen with the food service manager was conducted. The following observations were made: 1) Condiments a two large containers of red liquid were unlabeled in the walk in refrigerator. 2) Crumbs and food debris were observed along kitchen floor between and behind appliances. 3) Accumulated food debris and dust was observed along the tops of protruding electrical outlet boxes and window sills throughout the kitchen suggesting they had not been cleaned or even wiped in some time. On 1/31/19 at 12:48 PM, another walkthrough of the facility kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made: 1) Crumbs were observed on the floor between appliances and under counters as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide Resident #16 with the most dignified existence. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents investigated for dignity during the survey process and 1 of 39 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Surveyor observation of Resident #16's breakfast on 2/5/19 revealed the breakfast was in the resident's room and on the over bed table at 8:37 AM. Further observations revealed the facility staff failed to provide Resident #16 with breakfast until 9:05 AM (at least 28 minutes of sitting in Resident #16's room) and failed to re-heat the food for Resident #16. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 2/5/19 at 1:00 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to provide Resident #16 with the most dignified existence. See F 692
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-05 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to honor residents (# #58, #283, #183) menu choices and shower requests. This was evident for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for choices during the annual survey and 2 of 39 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. Interview with Resident #58's family member on 1/29/19 at 11:15 AM revealed Resident #58's food dislikes had been recorded but staff were not honoring his/her dislikes. The meal tickets stated dislikes: cheese, chicken, potatoes, turkey, deluxe macaroni and cheese and white bread. On 1/30/19 at lunch Resident #58 was served chicken with staff ignoring the dislikes listed on the meal ticket. Although the food choices were submitted to the Dietary Manager and written on the meal ticket, Resident #58's food choices had not been honored. On 1/30/19 at 12:15 PM Unit Manager #6 confirmed Resident #58's food choices were not honored. 2. On 1/21/19 Resident #283 requested the alternative meal choice for dinner. Geriatric Nursing Assistant #8(GNA) wrote when he/she went to obtain the alternative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident complaint, reviews of a medical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1. take steps to protect a resident's property from becoming lost, and 2. maintain a current list of a resident's belongings. This was evident for 1 (Resident #183) of 1 resident reviewed for personal property during an annual recertification survey 1 of 39 residents selected for review during the annual survey and the facility staff failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to 1. take steps to protect a resident's property from becoming lost, and 2. maintain a current list of a resident's belongings In an interview with Resident #183 on 1/29/19 at 10:18 AM, Resident #183 stated that s/he was missing sweaters and new pants. Resident #183 stated that s/he did notify the facility laundry people of the missing items a couple months ago. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-05 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a written notice for emergency transfers to the resident and/or the resident representative and the facility failed to provide and resident and the resident's family member with written notification regarding an emergent transfer to the hospital Resident (#183). This was found to be evident for 4 out of 8 residents reviewed for a facility-initiated transfer during the investigative portion of the survey and 4 of 39 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. A medical record review for Resident # 38 was conducted on 1/30/19. Review of the physician order written on 6/22/18 revealed that Resident # 38 had a change in their medical condition that required an immediate transfer to an acute care hospital for further evaluation. Review of the medical record failed to reveal a written notice for emergency transfers to the resident, resident representative and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on resident complaint, reviews of a medical record and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to initiate a care plan to address a resident's behaviors of wandering into other resident rooms. This was evident for 1 (Resident #40) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents during an annual recertification. The findings include: During an interview with Resident #49 on 1/29/19 at 12:36 PM, Resident #49 indicated Resident #40 wanders into his/her room occasionally and Resident #40 has startled Resident #49 in the past. Reviews of Resident #40's medical record on 2/1/19 failed to reveal any care plan to address Resident #40's wandering behaviors. In an interview with the nursing unit manager on 2/1/19 at 1:49 PM, the nursing unit manager stated that the nursing staff had not initiated a care plan to address Resident #40's wandering throughout the facility in his/her wheelchair.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide services to Resident #334 as stated in the care plan. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care plans during the annual survey process. The findings include: Once the facility staff completes an in-depth assessment of the resident, the interdisciplinary team meet and develop care plans. Care plans provide direction for individualized care of the resident. A care plan flows from each resident's unique list of diagnoses and should be organized by the resident's specific needs. The care plan is a means of communicating and organizing the actions and assure the resident's needs are attended to. Medical record review for Resident #334 revealed the facility staff initiated a care plan on 1/14/19 which stated: Resident is at risk for falls related to history of falls. (It was also noted in the medical record Resident #334 had falls on 1/9, 1/11, 1/15, 1/27 and 2/1 2019). An intervention on the care plan was: bed in low position. Surveyor observation of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure the dose of a medication was as accurate as possible. This was evident for 1 of 6 residents observed for medication pass and 1 of 33 opportunities for error. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #49 revealed on 11/29/18 the physician ordered: Iron Sulfate 325 milligrams-7.4 cubic centimeters (cc) via PEG tube every day as a supplement. This medication is an iron supplement used to treat or prevent low blood levels of iron (e.g., for anemia). Iron is an important mineral that the body needs to produce red blood cells and keep you in good health. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a medical procedure in which a tube (PEG tube) is passed into a patient's stomach through the abdominal wall, most commonly to provide a means of feeding when oral intake is not adequate, medications and fluids as needed. Observation of medication pass on 2/1/19 at 8:15 AM revealed facility staff nurse #13 used a medication cup to measure the 7.4 cc of medication to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and observation it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure an order for the use of a hand splint was followed (#22) and the facility staff failed to apply a heel protective device for Resident (#183). This was true for 2 out of the 6 residents reviewed for Range of Motion during the annual survey process. The evidence is as follows: 1. A review of Resident #22's clinical record revealed that the primary physician wrote an order on 4/5/18 to Don right hand orthotic 9AM, remove at 3PM. This surveyor observed on 2/1/19 at 1:59 PM the resident laying in bed with right hand below the bed sheets. I asked the unit manager to lift the sheets so that the hand could be observed. When he lifted the sheet, it was observed that the hand splint was not on the resident. The unit manager said he would put the hand splint on the resident. He looked on the night stand and could not find it. He looked inside the nightstand's drawer and could not find it there either. He then went to the dresser and searched the first drawer. He found it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow a written physician order to prevent loss of range of motion (Resident #51). This is evident for 1 of 4 resident's reviewed for limited range of motion. The findings include: On 1-31-19 at 12:30 PM with Unit Manager #6 it was confirmed that physician ordered bilateral orthotic hand splints (that were to be placed by 10:00 AM after light range of motion exercise and removed by 2:00 PM) had not been placed on Resident #51 who is totally dependent on the facility staff for all care. It was also confirmed that on Resident #51's left hand the middle finger had a nail that was 1/2 inch over the nail bed and pressing into the palm making an indention. The orthotic splints are to maintain the current range of motion in the hands and the nails are to be kept trimmed to prevent skin breakdown. The facility failed to consistently apply ordered hand splints which are to prevent decrease in current range of motion in the hands and maintain fingernails.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure a resident was free from accident hazards. This is evident for 2 out of 2 residents selected for reveiw of accidents during the survey and 2 (#54 and #67) out of 39 residents reviewed during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure a resident was free from accident hazards. On 1/30/2019 a review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed a Change in Condition dated 1/12/19 which stated the resident had burns and blisters on both inner thighs from being burnt by hot soup during lunch. A Progress Note from 1/14/2019 stated Patient spilled hot soup on his/her leg over the weekend and a blister developed. Further review of the medical record revealed a care plan Resident/Patient requires assistance/is dependent for ADL care in eating related to: Paralysis/Weakness affecting left side. Activities of Daily Living are activities performed by individuals on a daily basis that would be necessary for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide Resident #16 with the most provisions to provide for optimal nutrition. This was evident for 1 of 12 residents selected for review of nutrition and 1 of 39 resident selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: 1 A. The facility staff failed to get Resident #16 out of bed for all meals as ordered. Medical record review for Resident #16 revealed on 10/12/18 the physician ordered: out of bed for meals. Surveyor observation of the resident on 2/5/19 at 8:37 AM revealed the resident in bed. The resident's breakfast tray was noted to be sitting on the over-bed table as the surveyor entered the room and the facility staff failed to give Resident #16 the tray in a timely manner. At 9:05 AM, it was noted the facility staff gave Resident #16 breakfast: however, the facility staff failed to get the resident out of bed as ordered. It was noted the resident was in bed and the breakfast tray was placed on the over-bed table in front of Resident #16. 1 B. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to have emergency equipment a manual ventilation bag (Ambu) at the bedside for Resident #334 in accordance with the standard of practice. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident selected for review of respiratory care/tracheotomy during the annual survey process. The findings include: Surveyor observation of Resident #334 on 1/2/19 at 10:00 AM revealed the resident lying in his/her bed with a tracheostomy tube connected to a tracheostomy mask with oxygen. A tracheotomy, or tracheostomy, is a surgical procedure which consists of making an incision on the anterior aspect of the neck and opening a direct airway through an incision in the trachea. A check of equipment needs for resident's #344 respiratory care failed to reveal a manual ventilation bag (Ambu) and trach adapter to deliver lifesaving oxygen to the resident if needed. An Ambu bag is a manual resuscitator or self-inflating bag, is a hand-held device commonly used to provide positive pressure ventilation to patients who are not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to thoroughly assess the need for pain medication for Resident (#16). This was evident for 1 of 4 residents selected for pain assessment and 1 of 39 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: Pain is often regarded as the fifth vital sign regarding healthcare because it is accepted now in healthcare that pain, like other vital signs, is an objective sensation rather than subjective. As a result, nurses are trained and expected to assess pain. A component of pain assessment-focusing on words to describe pain, intensity, location, duration, and aggravating or alleviating factors. It is the expectation the facility staff assess pain prior to and after the administration of pain medication to determine the need of the medication and the effectiveness of the medication. Medical record review for Resident #16 revealed on 11/23/18 the physician ordered: Oxycodone-Acetaminophen, 5 milligrams (mgs)/325 mgs by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain 6-10. Oxycodone is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-05 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner failed to determine the significance and need of an ordered laboratory blood test for Resident #67. This was evident for 1 of 39 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #67 revealed on 10/4/18 the Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner (CRNP) ordered: Eliquis 2.5 milligrams by mouth every day for DVT prophylaxis. Deep vein thrombosis, or DVT, is a blood clot that forms in a vein deep in the body. Eliquis belongs to the group of medications called anticoagulants. Anticoagulants prevent harmful blood clots from forming in the blood vessels. They do this by reducing the ability of the blood to clot. Further record review revealed on 10/4/18 the CRNP ordered: INR tonight for results in the morning. The INR, or international normalized ratio measures the time for the blood to clot. It is used to monitor blood-thinning medicines, which are also known as anticoagulants. Because of this, people taking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%. Based on observation of medication pass on 2/1/19 the facility staff failed to administer medications to Resident (#49) resulting in an error rate of 6.06%. This was evident of 2 of 33 opportunities for error and 1 of 6 residents observed during medication pass. The findings include: 2 A. The facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for Resident #49. Medical record review for Resident #49 revealed on 10/30/18 the physician ordered: Keppra 500 milligram (mgs) via PEG tube 2 times a day for seizures. Keppra is a medication used to control seizures. Seizures are symptoms of a brain problem. They happen because of sudden, abnormal electrical activity in the brain. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a medical procedure in which a tube (PEG tube) is passed into a patient's stomach through the abdominal wall, most commonly to provide a means of feeding when oral intake is not adequate, medications and fluids as needed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure medications were thoroughly labeled with residents' name. This was evident for 1of 5 medication carts observed during the annual survey process. The findings include: Observation of medication pass on 2/1/19 at 8:15 AM revealed a bottle of liquid Potassium Chloride in the bottom draw of the medication cart. Potassium chloride is a mineral supplement used to treat or prevent low levels of potassium in the blood. Potassium is essential for the function of the heart, muscles, kidneys, nerves, and digestive system. Further observation of the medication cart revealed the bottle of Potassium Chloride had no name on the bottle to determine which resident it was to be administered to. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 2/5/19 at 1:00 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to ensure medications were thoroughly labeled with residents' name.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-05 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon resident interview, staff interview and medical record review it was determined that facility staff failed to assist a resident in obtaining routine and emergency dental care for Resident # 38. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents selected for review of dental during the survey process. The findings include: 1. An interview was conducted with Resident # 38 on 1/29/2019 at 11:4 5 AM. When asked if the resident was experiencing any dental or oral issues the resident responded I have missing teeth and tooth pain. I told them I wanted to see a dentist. Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed on 9/13/18 and the facility staff coded the Resident in Section L Oral/Dental Status as mouth or facial discomfort and reports difficulty chewing. The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gathers information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. The facility staff failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records. On 1/30/2019 at 12:16 PM a copy of Resident #54's Care Plan was obtained from the Director of Nursing (DON). A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Review of the Care Plan revealed that the copy presented to surveyors by the DON was inconsistent with the Care Plan stored digitally within Point Click Care (PCC). PCC is a software program used by facilities to digitally manage resident records, medications and care plans. It is commonly used as a reference by employees when providing care to residents. The physical copy of Resident #54's Care Plan given to surveyors had two focuses, Resident is at risk for injury or complications related to the use of anticoagulation therapy and Resident has actual skin disruption related to blister formation that were not present in PCC and thus not available to staff using PCC to reference Resident #54's Care Plan. Inaccurate records place the resident at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide the most effective infection control practices while administering medications to Resident (#52) and facility staff failed to reduce the risk of cross contamination and spread of infections by not washing hands after direct patient care for Resident # 334. This was evident for 1 of 6 residents observed for medication pass and 1 out of 33 opportunities for error (Resident #52) and 1 out of 2 residents reviewed for a facility-initiated transfer during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to provide the most effective infection control practices while administering medications to Resident # 52. Medical record for Resident #52 revealed on 8/21/18 the physician ordered: Systane .3-.4%, 1 drop both eyes for dry eyes. Systane is used to relieve burning, irritation, and discomfort caused by dry eyes. Observation of medication pass on 2/1/19 at 9:00 AM revealed facility staff nurse # 13 obtained toilet tissue from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview of facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: 1. On 1/29/19 at 9:32 AM a mobile cart used for serving coffee was observed in the hallway outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. A container filled with single use creamers was observed inside the cart. Both the container itself and the creamers were soiled with dried coffee spills. The cart had dried, sticky stains from spilled juice and had crumbs stuck to its surface. 2. On 1/30/19 at 1:25 PM a meal cart was observed exiting the elevator on the first floor. The cart had brown stains on the white exterior and dried food crumbs stuck to the bottom edge. The exterior covering was broken with holes and chipped corners. 3. On 1/31/19 at 8:23 AM a meal cart was observed exiting the elevator on the second floor. The cart was visibly soiled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$32,383 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $32,383 — penalty dated 2023-12-22
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1801 WENTWORTH HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/01/2021 |
| STERN, ARYEH | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/01/2021 |
| SCHWARTZ, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2021 |
| DERCOLE, JOANNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2021 |
| MIRZA, ZIAD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| EIDLISZ, SOLOMON | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| GLUCK, RIVKA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215081. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.