No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Autumn Lake Healthcare At Overlea

6116 Belair Road, Baltimore, MD 21206 · For profit - Corporation · 160 certified beds · (410) 426-1424 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 426-1424 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2021Resident-funds citation (F0567)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2021
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (64) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4201 Belmar Ave · (410) 426-9203 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Cvs0.6 mi
6635 Belair Rd # 37 · (410) 254-9755 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5950 Belair Rd · (410) 426-4770 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6300 Walther Ave · (410) 396-7900 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4301 Raspe Ave · (410) 485-7654

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.2%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.4%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms73.7%22.8%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%2.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.0%22.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.6%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%5.9%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.4%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.4%13.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.9%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.6%80.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.1%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.5%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.421.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.251.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 105 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.0%CMS range 38.9–61.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.6%CMS range 9.3–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge85.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.6–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.351.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.31
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.89
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.25
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
42.4%
Total nursing turnover
44.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 143.6 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-30)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2021-08-04)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

64 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint, reviews of all pertinent documents and a closed medical record, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to implement preventative measures to prevent the development and deterioration of a resident's pressure ulcers. This was evident for 1 (Resident #2) out of 4 residents reviewed during a survey. The findings include: On 03/30/26 the Office of Health Care Quality received a complaint with concerns that Resident #2 was not provided with quality of care. The complaint indicated Resident #2 developed pressure wounds that deteriorated during their time in the facility.A review of CMS guidelines to prevent pressure ulcers require nursing facilities to prevent new pressure ulcers unless clinically unavoidable by ensuring proper risk assessment, implementing individualized care plans, providing necessary treatment/services, and turning bed-bound patients at least every two hours. Key measures focus on nutrition, hydration, and using pressure-reducing surfaces.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-22 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that the handrails on the third floor were repaired and safe for the residents to use. This deficient practice was widespread on the third floor. The findings include: On 10/22/25 at 10:22 AM while on the third floor of the facility the surveyor observed multiple handrails with screws that were not flush with the handrail. The screws were sticking out with the potential to injure a resident's hand. The handrail near the elevator was separated by a gap. On 10:23 AM the surveyor observed a nail sticking out of the handrail outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The surveyor observed a hole in the handrail outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] & the handrail had a yellow screw that was not flush to the surface. The surveyor observed two screws on separate sides of the handrail outside of the MDS Nurse's office that were not flush to the surface. On 10:26 AM the surveyor observed an unflushed screw in the handrail outside of room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatments to assure proper care for Residents with suprapubic catheters. This was evident in 2 (Resident #5 and #11) of 2 residents reviewed for suprapubic catheter and Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) during the complaint survey. A suprapubic catheter (SPC) is a surgically created connection between the urinary bladder and the skin in the abdomen used to drain urine through a tube from the bladder to a collection bag in individuals with obstruction of normal urinary flow. The findings included: 1a) On 10/21/25 at 9:15 AM, the surveyor reviewed intake # 329288. The intake alleged that Resident #5's suprapubic catheter (SPC) was not cared for properly. On 10/21/25 at 9:32 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #5's medical record. The review revealed Resident #5 had a past medical history of benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower track urinary symptoms and urine retention. On further review, a consultation was placed for a urology (provider that specializes in urinary tract system)/pelvic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, consultation note review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with acceptable professional standards and practices by keeping complete documentation. This was evident for 2 (Resident #5 & #11) out of 11 residents reviewed during the complaint survey.A suprapubic catheter (SPC) is a surgically created connection between the urinary bladder and the skin in the abdomen used to drain urine through a tube from the bladder to a collection bag in individuals with obstruction of normal urinary flow.The findings included: On 10/21/25 at 9:15 AM, the surveyor reviewed intake # 329288. The intake alleged that the facility was unable to provide medical health information to the hospital emergency room staff upon Resident #5's transfer. On 10/21/25 at 9:32 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #5's medical record. The review revealed Resident #5 had a past medical history of benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower track urinary symptoms and urine retention and transferred to the hospital on 5/25/25. Next, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the shower rooms on the third floor were cleaned for the residents' use. This deficient practice was evidenced in 2 (#A, #B) of 2 shower rooms on the third floor assessed for cleanliness during the complaint survey.The findings include:On 10/21/25 at 8:30 am during observation rounds on the third floor the surveyor observed a large stain on the floor under the sink along with water & stains around the commode in Shower Room B. In Shower Room A the surveyor observed multiple round brown stains on the floor in front of the sink and stains on the floor in the shower stall & in the area where the commode is located.On 10/22/25 at 10:12 am the surveyor observed the same round brown spots on the floor in front of the sink in Shower Room A, the same spots from the previous day. The surveyor wet a paper towel with water and was able to remove one of the brown spots on the floor.On 10/22/25 at 10:14 am during an interview with Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #7 the surveyor asked how often the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-30 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure residents whose funds were managed by the facility had access to their money anytime. This deficient practice was evidenced in 94 of 94 resident accounts being managed by the facility staff. The findings include: On 04/28/25 at 11:28 AM during an interview with Business Office Manager # 31 the surveyor asked a series of questions related to the residents' ability to access their finances. Business Officer Manager #31 verbalized the normal business hours at the facility was 8:30 AM-5:00 PM Monday-Friday and he/she is available on Friday if any of the residents need money for the weekend. Prior to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic the Receptionist would give the residents money. If they worked on Saturday or Sunday he/she would be available to give them money. When asked can residents access their funds on the weekend? Business Office Manager #31 verbalized nobody can access the funds during the weekend. When asked how many residents funds are being managed, Business Office…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the high temperature dishwasher's final rinse was at the temperature to sanitize the dishes and utensils at the required 180F-Fahrenheit degree temperature,and 2) failed to ensure that the foods are stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety procedures. This was evident for 11 of 11 food service and kitchen equipment in the kitchen areas noted during survey activities. The findings include: 1) On 04/23/25 at 10:15 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen area was conducted with the District Manager and the Dietary Manager. A record review of the mechanical dishwasher log revealed that the final rinse temperatures did not reach the required final rinse temperature of 180F on 04/23/2025 at 10:17 AM as indicated on the data plate by the unit manufacturer specifications. A follow up observation of the dishwasher was conducted on 04/23/2025 at 10:22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility staff: 1) failed to label residents basins and urinals to prevent cross contamination of bodily fluids in shared bathrooms located on the second floor and 2) failed to ensure that the clean linens were kept separate from the contaminated linen by the use of separate rooms, closets, or other designated spaces with a closing door to provide secure methods for reducing the risk of accidental contamination within the laundry rooms. This was observed during an annual survey. The findings include: 1) During observation rounds on 04/24/25 at 8:26 AM the surveyor observed two round and 1 square unlabeled basin in the shared bathroom between Rooms 205-207 located on the second floor. There was an unlabeled urinal in the bathroom as well. The surveyor asked Geriatric Nursing Assistant # 27 how the staff deciphers which basin belongs to each resident. GNA #27 verbalized they usually write the room numbers on the basin so they could know which resident's they belong to. At 8:34 AM the surveyor observed a used urinal in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure residents had their call bells in reach to notify the staff when assistance was needed. This deficient practice was evidenced in 5 (#5, #30, #47, #94, #97) resident observed without their call bells during the recertification survey. The findings include: During observation rounds on 04/23/25 at 8:25 AM the surveyor observed Resident #47 call bell on the floor and Resident # 30 call bell was on the other side of the room which was not in reach. Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) # 27 confirmed the residents did not have their call bells. At 8:43 AM the surveyor observed Resident # 94's call bell on the floor near the left side of the bed. At 9:08 AM the surveyor observed Resident #97's call bell on the floor near the right side of the bed. At 9:10 AM the surveyor observed Resident #5's call bell on the floor on the left side of the bed. On 04/29/25 at 9:53 AM during an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #1 the surveyor asked, does the management team expect the staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant personnel files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to conduct yearly performance reviews at least every 12 months on 3 out of 5 personnel files reviewed. The findings included: On 4/29/25 at 8:03 AM, the surveyor reviewed 5 Nursing Assistant employees' files. The review revealed that the employee files for Staff # 20, 21, and 22 (all three staff had been employed over a year) did not contain a yearly performance reviews. On 4/29/2025 at 9:21 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) who was also in charge of staff development. During the interview the surveyor asked if GNAs had yearly performance reviews. The ADON stated he had just started in October of last year and would follow-up. On 4/30/25 at 8:22 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). During the interview the NHA confirmed that annual evaluations of GNA were not being completed.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and records review, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to the professional standards of practice regarding medication storage. This was found to be evident in 2 (Ground, and 2nd floor) out of 2 medicine drawers and 1 (2nd floor) out of 2 medication storage rooms reviewed for medicine storage. The findings include: On 04/25/25 at 8:00 AM, the surveyors reviewed the medicine room with LPN # 3 on the 2nd floor. The surveyors observed a blister pack labelled Famotidine 20 mg tablet that expired on 10/26/ 2024.The surveyor verified with LPN # 3 that the medication expired. LPN # 3 stated that the drugs would be removed and returned to the pharmacy. On 4/28/25 at 08:57 AM the surveyors observed the 3rd floor medication cart with RN # 13 and found 11 loose pills. The surveyors asked where the pills came from. RN # 13 stated the pills might have fallen out of the packets and she would turn them in to Unit Manager # 4. On 04/28/25 at 11:00 AM, the surveyors observed 4 loose pills in the ground floor medication cart. LPN # 11 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 53 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to consistently provide a clean, comfortable and home-like environment. This deficient practice was discovered during the recertification survey. The findings include: During observation rounds on 04/23/25 at 8:16 AM the clothing armoire door was hanging off in room [ROOM NUMBER]. At 8:32 AM the surveyor observed an empty bottle of Pepsi, a folded piece of paper, two small blue packs of a snack, and tissues under Resident #25's bed. At 8:41 AM the surveyor observed the toilet paper dispenser was broken and the middle light bulb was out in the shared bathroom between Rooms 213 & 215. Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #28 confirmed the surveyor's findings. At 8:47 AM the surveyor observed room [ROOM NUMBER]-B did not have a privacy curtain. At 8:50 AM the surveyor observed room [ROOM NUMBER]-B did not have a privacy curtain. At 8:53 AM the surveyor noticed the faucet was loose and the surveyor was unable to turn the water off in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This was found to be evident in 2 (G10 and G11) out of 11 ground floor rooms reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: On 04/29/25 at 10:33 AM, the surveyors observed the environment of the resident's room. The room was dirty, sticky on the floor when stepped on, and the bathroom wall had brown stains smeared on the wall. On further observation, the surveyors saw that the window blinds were broken, the ceiling tiles were coming apart, the toilet pipe wasn't fixed in the wall and the wall was cracked around the pipe. The floor was cracked and broken at the joint at the entry to the bathroom. On 04/29/25 at 11:42 AM, interviews and observations were conducted with the Administrator, Maintenance Director, and Account Manager of the Healthcare Services Group (AMHSG) were conducted to review the concerns. The Maintenance Director said the facility performed some repairs and contracted out other repair work when necessary. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement a patient centered care plans for dental care and integumentary care. This deficient practice was evidenced in 3 (#25, #37, #112) of five resident records reviewed for dental and integumentary care during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 04/25/25 at 1:41 PM a review of Resident #37 electronic medical record revealed the resident did not have a care plan for dental care. On 04/28/25 at 9:21 AM a review of Resident #25 electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident did not have a care plan for dental care. On 04/30/25 at 11:39 AM a review of Resident #112 EMR revealed a care plan for integumentary care was not initiated although the resident is ordered to receive a skin treatment twice a day for his/her skin condition. On 04/30/25 at 11:56 AM during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) the surveyor asked, should Resident's #25 & #37 have a care plan for poor dentition and should Resident #112 have an integumentary care plan? The DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record reviews, and interviews it was determined that the facility staff: 1) failed to clarify a physician's order, failed to monitor a resident for extrapyramidal side effects who was prescribed psychotropic medication, failed to ensure a resident received their therapeutic treatment for a skin condition, and 2) failed to follow through on laboratory monitoring recommendations. This was found evident of 3 (Resident #72, #112, and #126) out of 6 Residents reviewed for medication regimen review. The findings include: 1) During observation rounds on 04/24/24 at 11:03 AM the surveyor observed Resident #112 skin was extremely dry and scaly. A review of the resident's electronic medical record revealed the resident was diagnosed with Atopic Dermatitis. On 04/29/25 at 9:42 AM a review of Resident #112 treatment administration record (TAR) revealed the resident was ordered to receive a dermatologic cream to their skin twice a day. Further review of the order revealed the physician failed to indicate where the cream should be applied. At 1:40 PM the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medication record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to act upon a pharmacy recommendation to add a dosage to a supplement prescribed to a resident. The deficient practice was evidenced in 1 (#127) of 2 pharmacy recommendations reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 04/28/25 at 10:38 AM a review of the pharmacist recommendations revealed there was a recommendation dated 02/19/25 in which the nursing staff failed to act upon. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) at 12:25 PM the surveyor asked what the process is for addressing pharmacy recommendations. The DON verbalized the recommendations are received via email and the unit managers print the reviews and give them to the physicians. After they review the recommendations, the management team checks to see if there is a new order to be carried out. The form is signed and given to Medical Records to file. On 04/30/25 at 9:36 AM review of the pharmacy review dated 02/19/25 revealed Cyanocobalamin did not have strength. There are multiple doses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and resident's family and staff interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that dependent resident's personal hygiene needs were adequately met by offering and providing showers as scheduled. This was evident for 1 of 1 (101) residents reviewed during the survey process. The findings include: In an interview with Resident #101's son on 4/24/2025 at 12:00 PM, revealed that Resident #101 stated they don't give showers I get a bed bath every day. I would like a shower. The son stated that the resident had asked their spouse to take them to the shower, but the spouse was physically unable to do so and instead gave the resident a sponge bath. The Resident's son reported that both the water and the washcloth that had been used were black with dirt. The complainant also reported that the Resident had stated that they were itchy from lack of washing. Review of Resident #101's most recent MDS revealed that s/he is totally dependent for bathing requiring extensive assistance for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility reported incidents and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide documentation that allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. This was evident for 4 (#31, #7, #26, #33) residents of 19 facility reported incidents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 2/13/25 at 2:00 PM facility reported incident MD00182916 was reviewed and revealed that Resident #31 was discharged to the hospital on 7/25/22 due to abnormal blood work. On 8/26/22 the facility was made aware by a hospital social worker that Resident #31 alleged verbal abuse by nurses at the facility and physical abuse by the geriatric nursing assistants at the facility. According to the facility's documentation an investigation was initiated. Review of the investigative packet that was given to the surveyor by the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) revealed an initial and 5 day email confirmation that an investigation was done, however there was no investigation included in the paperwork. On 2/13/25 at 2:23 PM an interview was conducted with the NHA.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 4 (#12, #23, #7, #21) of 42 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include. A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1.Review of Resident #12's medical record on 2/13/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include cerebral infarction. Cerebral infarction, also known as an ischemic stroke, is a condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted, causing brain cells to die. Further review of Resident #12's medical record revealed a nurse's note on 7/3/24 at 10:15 AM that stated, Resident left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to immediately inform the resident representative of the residents' transfer to the hospital. This was evident for 1 (#16) of 42 residents reviewed during the complaint survey. The findings include: Resident #16's medical record was reviewed on 2/18/25 at 9:33 AM. A change in Condition progress note dated 1/21/24 at 00:15 (12:15 AM) indicated that Resident #16 was found lying on the floor. Upon assessment the resident had no apparent injuries however his/her oxygen saturation (SpO2) was 75% (Normal SpO2 is between 95%-100%). A respiratory assessment revealed diminished lung sounds and grunting-like breathing. The physician was notified and ordered oxygen administration and if there was no improvement, send to the emergency room (ER) for further evaluation. The note indicated that the resident's representative was made aware. It did not identify the time of the notification. Another progress note at 1:00 AM on 1/21/24 indicated that the resident's oxygen saturation improved to 85%, and 911 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility reported incidents and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide documentation that allegations of abuse were reported timely to the appropriate agencies. This was evident for 2 (#26, #27) residents of 42 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 2/20/25 at 11:49 AM a review of facility reported incident MD00186485 alleged that on 12/6/22 Resident #26 alleged that a geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) had abused the resident during care early on 12/6/22. Review of the facility reported incident was blurred as to the actual time, with it either being at 3:00 AM or 8:00 AM, which was confirmed by the NHA. Review of the email confirmation that was submitted to OHCQ documented that the initial report was not filed until 12/6/22 at 5:25 PM, which was not within 2 hours of suspected abuse. There was no email confirmation as to when the final report was submitted to the Office of Healthcare Quality (OHCQ). On 2/20/25 at 12:05 PM an interview was conducted with the NHA. The NHA confirmed the report was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 2 (#10, #14) of 42 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) On 2/14/25 at 12:25 PM Resident #10's medical record was reviewed and revealed Resident #10 was admitted to Hospice services on 11/9/24. Review of the quarterly MDS with an assessment reference date of 2/10/25, Section O, failed to capture that the resident received Hospice services. On 2/20/25 at 12:55 PM an interview was conducted with the MDS coordinator who confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to revise a resident's care plan. This was evident for 1 (#10) of 42 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 2/14/25 at 12:25 PM facility reported incident MD00209375 was reviewed and revealed Resident #10 alleged that on 9/1/24 GNA #23 hurt Resident #10's arm. Review of the facility investigation documented that Resident #10 had a history of banging his/her arm on the side rail. The investigation documented that padding had been placed on the side rail to prevent further injury and that the issue had been care planned. On 2/19/25 at 11:30 AM observation was made of Resident #10 lying in bed having a dressing change by hospice staff. There was a quarter bed rail up on the right side of the bed with a yellow foam noodle on the top of the bed rail. Review of the care plan, has potential for skin tear, failed to have the intervention of padding the side rail. Review of the care plan, has skin tears to right lower arm and has a behavior problem r/t banging…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a recapitulation of the resident's stay was completed following a resident's discharge from the facility. This was evident for 1 (Resident #23) of 42 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 2/14/25 at 10:42 AM a record review was conducted for Resident #23. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility in July 2017 for physical and occupational therapy following an amputation of the right leg above the knee. On 1/20/23 a care plan note documented, Family and patient in agreement that they desire the matter of social work addressing alternative nursing home locations. Patient will look to pursue further the Alf [assisted living facility] after that patient is located within another nursing home facility. On 4/28/23 social services documented a Maryland Discharge Instructs for Resident #23 for a discharge of 5/1/23 to an assisted living facility. It was completed by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide showers twice weekly to a resident (Resident #17). This was evident for 1 of 42 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #17's medical record on 2/14/25 for a concern related not receiving showers from October 2023 until January 2024 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include dementia. Dementia is a general term for a decline in mental abilities that impacts a person's daily life. It's caused by brain damage that destroys nerve cells. Further review of Resident #17's medical record revealed the facility staff assessed the Resident on 11/7/23 to need supervision and/or touching assistance for showering and bathing. Review of Resident #17's care plans revealed a care plan entitled: Resident has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Self Care Performance Deficit related to dementia initiated on 10/26/23 that included an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures ulcers for a resident (Resident #1). This is evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during a complaint survey. The findings included: A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according the their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II ( superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III ( full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and / or eschar in the wound bed). Review of Resident #1's medical record on 2/14/25 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free from an unnecessary drug (Resident #6 and #15). This was evident for 2 of 42 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record on 2/14/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include hypertension. Hypertension, also known as high blood pressure, is a condition where the blood pressure in the arteries is consistently elevated above normal levels. Review of Resident #15's physician orders revealed on 4/1/24 the Resident was ordered Metoprolol 25 mg one time a day for high blood pressure, hold if blood pressure is less than 110 or heart rate less than 60. Review of Resident #15 April 2024 Medication Administration Record revealed from 4/1 through 4/14/24 the Resident was administered Metoprolol 2 times outside of the parameters: a) on 4/8/24 at 6:00 PM when the Resident's heart rate was 59 and b) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to schedule a follow up appointment with a consultant for a resident (Resident #15). This was evident for 1 of 42 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record on 2/14/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include hydronephrosis. Hydronephrosis is a condition where urine backs up into the kidney, causing it to swell. Review of a nurse's note on 3/31/24 at 11:37 PM stated the Resident had a Foley in place. A Foley catheter is a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine. Review of the Resident's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed the Resident's plan: 1. Will need outpatient urology follow up for moderate right hydronephrosis, referral for urology appointment has been made. 2. Foley catheter currently in place, will need voiding trial. Further review of Resident #15's medical record revealed a nurse's note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-04 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to properly maintain the mandatory testing frequency for staff to help prevent the spread of COVID-19. This was found to be true for all employees tested during the week of November 17, 2020. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors in the facility. The findings include: A review of intake # MD00160661 conducted on August 3, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. revealed a concern about the facility failing to maintain the mandatory COVID-19 testing frequency outlined in the Amended Directive and Order Regarding Nursing Home Matters document (MDH 2020-11-17-02) effective November 17, 2020. MDH 2020-11-17-02 which stated to increase mandatory COVID-19 testing to twice a week for nursing home employees and once a week for nursing home residents. A review of facility COVID-19 testing records for facility staff and residents for the month of November 2020 conducted on August 3, 2021 at 10:30 am revealed facility staff were not tested twice a week as ordered by MDH…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program as evidenced by the presence of insects. This was evident for the ground floor conference room and the back staircase. The findings include: On 7/29/2021 at 8:18 AM room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with live gnats flying in the room. On 8/3/2021 at 10:43 AM, a live gnat was observed in the ground floor conference room that the survey team was working from. At 10:45 AM observation of the employee entrance/ground floor exit/outdoor smoking section revealed the presence of multiple gnats just outside the facility door. A nonfunctional Ecolab bug trap was observed inside the door to the stairwell among 3 live gnats. On 8/4/2021 at 10:25 AM a house fly and a gnat were observed inside the ground floor conference room. The Administrator and Director of Nursing were made aware of these findings on 8/4/2021 during the exit conference.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation and interview with staff it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that residents call bells were within reach. This was evident for 2 (#27 and #74) of 60 residents observed during the initial resident sample observations. The findings include: On 7/22/2021 at 10:18 A.M. Resident #74 and Resident #27's call bells were observed on the floor where the residents could not reach them. Staff #5 was made aware of the call bell issues at this time. The Administrator and Director of Nursing were made aware of these findings on 8/4/2021 during the survey exit conference.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and resident interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This deficiency has the potential to affect multiple residents. The findings include: On 7/22/2021 at 10:34 AM during an initial tour of the facility, Resident #31's bathroom was observed with no soap or paper towels. On 7/27/2021 at 1:10 PM room [ROOM NUMBER]'s window was observed with 4 missing pieces of the vertical blinds. Resident #89 stated that they had to hang a blanket over the broken blinds to prevent the sun from waking them up in the morning. On 8/3/2021 at 9:33 AM the facility's rear elevator, registration # BC4264, was observed with dust buildup on the ceiling vent. At 9:43 AM the air intake vent on the side of the building facing the main parking lot was observed in disrepair and protruding from the wall allowing for possible pest entry. The Administrator and Director of Nursing were made aware of these findings on 8/4/2021 during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview and review of an abuse investigation it was determined that nursing staff failed to ensure that residents were free of abuse. This was evident for 1 (#59) out of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings are: A review of the facility investigation into a reported incident of staff to resident abuse revealed that Resident #59 was being assisted in bed by Nurse #14 on 1/1/21 at 7:30 PM. GNA #15 was assisting Resident #59's roommate and had the privacy curtain closed. She heard Nurse #14 talking loudly and very mean to Resident #59 because the resident got out of bed again. GNA #15 wrote that she continued with the task. When Nurse #14 became louder and started cursing she looked around the curtain. Nurse #14 was struggling to get the resident into the bed. Nurse #14 asked for her assistance, and she helped the resident back into bed. GNA #15 wrote that she called the (now former) Director of Nursing (DON) (Staff #16) to report the incident. A follow up interview with GNA #15 revealed that Nurse #14 was saying Get the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to update a resident's care plan after a change in status. This was evident in 1 (resident #31) of 60 residents reviewed during a survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #31's medical records on July 29, 2021 at 7:01A.M. revealed that on February 25, 2021, the resident attempted to escape from their assigned floor several times during the day. Resident #31's escape attempts caused the facility to complete a risk assessment on February 25, 2021 at 3:48 P.M. which assessed the resident as being at risk of attempting to escape from the facility in the future. Further review of Resident #31's medical records on July 29, 2021 at 9:20 A.M. revealed that a medical order for a Wanderguard was issued on February 25, 2021. A Wanderguard is a device used to monitor the location of a resident who was assessed as being at risk of escaping from the facility. A Wanderguard will make an alarm sound if the resident is close to elevators, steps, or doors that lead from the floor or unit to which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that resident clinical records were maintained in a complete and accurate manner. This was evident for 2 (#34 and #55) out of 60 resident clinical records reviewed. The findings are: 1) A review of Resident #34's clinical record revealed that the resident had a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) completed on 2/26/19. The resident's PASRR was to be reviewed by the state agency for determination of additional services and care related to mental illness. Further review revealed that the state agency reviewed the resident's PASRR for Intellectual Disability (ID) and determined that the PASRR would not be the subject of review because the resident did not have a diagnosis of ID. The facility social worker failed to thoroughly review this inaccurate determination and resubmit it for a corrected review. 2) A review of Resident #55's clinical record revealed that a PASRR was completed on 6/7/17. The state agency determined that additional services and/or a directed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-04 · tag F0924 — isolated
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure hand rails were secured firmly to the wall. This was evident for 1 resident floor observed during the survey. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors on the unit. The findings include: On 8/4/2021 at 09:21 AM during a tour of the facility, the handrail outside room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to be loose and not securely affixed to the walls. It was also observed at this time that the handrail end caps were missing on the handrails outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] and the Spa/shower room. The Administrator and Director of Nursing were made aware of these findings during the exit conference on 8/4/2021.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-08-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide residents with the most dignified existance (#53, #112, #121). This was evident for 3 of 48 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: Based on observation of lunch in the second-floor dining room it was determined the facility staff failed to provide residents with the most dignified existence by not all residents being served lunch at the same time while seated at the same table, failing to offer or provide clothing protectors and failed to provide Resident #53 with the most dignified existence. This was evident for 2 of 17 residents in the dining room for lunch. 1 A. The facility staff failed to provide lunch to all residents seated at the same table in a timely manner. Observation of lunch in the 2nd floor dining room on 8/27/18 at 12:12 PM revealed resident #117 was served lunch. The resident was seated at a table with 7 other residents. The facility staff continued to serve lunch to the other residents at the table.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-08-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to administer a medication to Resident #19 per the standard of practice and physicians' order. This was evident for 1 of 48 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #19 revealed on 3/7/18 the physician ordered: Levemir 30 units at hour of sleep. Levemir is a long-acting injectable insulin that can be used for long-term management of diabetes. Insulin is a hormone that is naturally produced in the body by the pancreas. It helps convert the glucose (sugar) in the bloodstream into energy. This energy is then distributed to cells throughout the body. On 5/30/18 the physician ordered: finger stick 2 times a day, morning and night, call physician if below 60 or above 400. Finger sticks are a way of testing the concentration of glucose in the blood. Particularly important in diabetes management, a blood glucose test is typically performed by piercing the skin (typically, on the finger) to draw blood, then applying the blood to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-08-31 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the Antibiotic Stewardship Program committee failed to conduct meetings as least quarterly. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #100 revealed on 12/30/17 the physician ordered: Ceftriaxone Sodium Solution 1 gram intravenously every 24 hours for urinary tract infection (UTI) for 5 Days. A UTI is an infection involving any part of the urinary system. Ceftriaxone, sold under the trade name Rocephin, is an antibiotic useful for the treatment of several bacterial infections. An intravenous is a thin, soft, plastic tube called a catheter that is inserted through the skin and into a vein and is used to give medicines and fluids. On 1/03/2018, the physician ordered: Ertapenem Sodium Solution, 1 gram intravenously one time a day for UTI until 1/11/2018 (8 days). Ertapenem injection is used to treat certain serious infections such as urinary tract infections that are caused by bacteria. It works by killing bacteria. On 4/16/2018, the physician ordered: Meropenem Solution, use 1 gram intravenously two times a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide residents with reasonable accommodations. This was evident for 2 of 5 residents observed during medication pass. The findings include: Observation of Resident #54's room during medication pass on 8/29/18 at 8:15 AM revealed the resident's sheet was worn through to the point of being able to see the mattress. Observation of Resident #110 on 8/29/18 at 9:00 AM revealed the resident in bed and the sheet was noted to be worn through and the mattress seen. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 8/31/18 at 2:00 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to provide Residents #54 and #110 with reasonable accommodations using bed sheets worn through so the mattress can be seen.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the physician of the results of a urine culture in a timely manner for Resident (#100). This was evident for 1 of 48 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #100 revealed on 7/17/18 the physician ordered: Urine culture. Further record review revealed the facility staff obtained the urinalysis as ordered. Urine culture is a simple test that can provide many useful pieces of information about various diseases and conditions. Urine can be evaluated by its physical appearance (color, cloudiness, odor, clarity) it can also be analyzed based on its chemical and molecular properties, including microscopic assessment. Urine culture and sensitivity (C&S) a microscopic study of the urine performed to determine the presence of pathogenic bacteria in patients with suspected urinary tract infection. Review of the medical record revealed the urinalysis results were in the facility on 7/18/18; however, it is not uncommon for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-31 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure clinical records were completed in an accurate manner (#81). This was true for 1 out of the 48 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings are: A review of Resident #81's clinical record revealed that the resident's physician wrote an order on 5/9/18 for the resident to have a helmet on while out of bed. The resident was observed on 8/29/18 at 1:56 PM to be without a helmet on while in the third-floor dining room. The resident was observed again on 8/29/18 from 2:28 PM to 2:31 PM to not have the helmet on while in the third-floor dining room. Two staff members were present in the room. One of whom exited upon my arrival. The resident was observed without the helmet on while in the third-floor dining room on 8/30/18 at 7:54 AM. The resident was observed without the helmet on while in the third-floor dining room on 8/30/18 at 11:18 AM. The resident was observed without the helmet on while in the third-floor dining room on 8/31/18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain the room of Resident #55 in a home like environment. This was evident for 1 of 48 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: Surveyor observation of Resident #55's room on 8/28/18 at 7:50 AM and 12:40 PM and 8/29/18 at 7:35 AM and 11:06 AM revealed Resident #55 had a 3-drawer dresser used for the resident's clothes. Further observation at that time revealed the top drawer of the dresser missing. It was further observed 2 drawers in place and the residents clothing placed in the top area that did not contain a drawer. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 8/31/18 at 2:00 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to maintain the environment for Resident #55 home like. During the initial tour of the facility on August 27, 2018 the survey team observed the following evidence of unattended maintenance and/or housekeeping concerns: The findings include: 1. A tour of the environment of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-31 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that the resident, resident's representative and the Ombudsman were notified in writing of the resident's transfer and the rationale for the transfer to an acute care facility. This was evident for 3 of 48 (#2; #64; #88) residents reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey. The finding includes: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 was conducted on 8/28/18 at 9:03 AM. Review of the nurse's notes revealed that resident #2 was transferred to the hospital on 8/1/18 and 7/21/18 via 911. Review of the medical record revealed Physician orders for transfer to the hospital. Further review failed to disclose evidence that Resident #2, their representative or the Ombudsman had been provided with a written notification or the rationale for the transfer. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 8/28/18 at 1:30 PM confirmed that written notifications to residents, their representatives and the Ombudsman were not sent out for this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-31 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to reassess a resident (#48) following a significant change in condition related to a significant weight loss. This was evident for 1 of 48 residents selected for review during the survey process. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a federally-mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. MDS assessments are completed upon admission, quarterly and for any significant change in condition. Categories of MDS are: Cognitive patterns, Communication and hearing patterns, Vision patterns, Physical functioning and structural problems which includes the assessment of range of motion, Continence, Psychosocial well-being, Mood and behavior patterns, Activity pursuit patterns, Disease diagnosis, Other health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to conduct a thorough and comprehensive assessment prior to initiating a care plan for Resident #110. This was evident for 1 of 48 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Medical record review revealed on 7/10/17 the facility staff initiated a care plan: resident has a behavior problem (Pica, eating nonfood items). An intervention on that care plan: keep items that resident can easily pick up and put in his/her mouth such as gloves out of reach. The care plan is a written document that is used and altered constantly. The care plan covers essentials of care - nutrition, mobility, sleeping, positioning, oral care and personal hygiene, falls prevention, psychological needs, recording of clinical signs, communication and information, and sexuality. An individual care plan is prepared for each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to revise resident's care plans as needed (#31 and #81). This was true for 2 out of the 48 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: 1. A review of Resident #31's clinical record revealed that the resident has a care plan to address Restorative Care/Functional maintenance with Splinting and PROM [Passive Range of Motion]. One of the interventions is Apply splints to bilateral hands. Keep on for up to 8 hours as tolerated. Skin check every 2 hours and PRN. The Director of Therapy was interviewed on 8/29/18 at 1:09 PM. He stated that the resident was discharged on 5/8/18 and it was recommended that the resident continue to wear left hand splint according to schedule (5 hours). A review of a facility form entitled Screening Form completed on 8/28/18 noted that per nursing report, pt [patient] removes the splint and therefore, it is difficult to maintain donning schedule. Change in RNP [Restorative Nursing Program]? Y/N (Y was circled).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-31 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to place Resident # 63 in a position conducive to eating. This was evident for 1 of 17 residents observed during lunch in the second-floor dining room. The findings include: Observation of dining on 8/28/18 at 12:17 PM revealed Resident #63 positioned in a recliner chair. The recliner positioned Resident #63 in a backward tilt instead of an upright position. The facility staff served Resident #63 lunch; however, failed to re-position the resident in the recliner in a more suitable position to eat. It was further noted the resident attempting to eat lunch and dropping food on his/herself. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 8/31/18 at 2:00 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to provide a position for Resident #63 conducive to eating.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-31 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to assist residents eating lunch in the second-floor dining room. This was evident for 2 of 17 residents observed during dining observation. The findings include: Observation of dining in the 2nd floor dining room on 8/27/18 at 12:12 PM revealed the facility staff failed to assist residents while eating lunch. Observation of lunch at that time revealed Residents #23 and #78 sitting next to each other eating. It was noted Resident #78 had a carton of milk and juice on the lunch tray. It was further noted; the containers were not opened for the resident. It was further revealed, Resident # 78 handed the carton of milk and juice to Resident #23 who opened a container of juice and milk for Resident #78 and handed the milk and juice back to Resident #78. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 8/31/18 at 2:00 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to assist Resident #78 by failing to open cartons of milk and juice.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to provide grooming and personal hygiene services (Resident #80). This is evident for 1 of 48 residents selected for review during the investigation stage of the survey process. The findings include: Observation of Resident #80 on 8/27/18 at 9:30 AM revealed the Resident to be unshaven and have elongated fingernails. Interview with the Resident at that time revealed the Resident would like to be shaven and have his fingernails trimmed. Further observation of the Resident on 8/28/18 at 12:15 PM, 8/29/18 at 10:42 AM and 8/30/18 at 7:39 AM revealed the Resident remains unshaven with elongated fingernails. Review of Resident #80's medical record revealed the Resident is dependent on the facility staff for his care, comfort and safety. The facility staff conducted a quarterly MDS assessment on 7/27/18 and coded the Resident in Section G Functional Status as a one person physical assist for personal hygiene. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 8/30/18 at 8:10 AM confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow Physician's orders as written for residents (#42; #55; #57). This was evident for 3 of 48 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: 1. Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to elevate the heels off of the bed for Resident (#55). Medical record review for Resident #55 revealed on 7/15/17 the physician ordered: float heels while in bed. When a resident must spend prolonged periods of time in bed, the risk for pressure ulcers to form increases. There are, however, several methods that, when employed properly, can greatly reduce those chances. A pillow (or a soft piece of foam) can be an effective tool in reducing pressure, when placed between parts of a patient's body that press against each other or against the mattress. When it comes to wound care, the term float the heels means that a resident's heels should be positioned in such a way as to remove all contact between the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-31 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain an ophthalmology consultation as recommended by the ophthalmologist for Resident #53. This was evident for 1 of 48 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #53 revealed the resident had an ophthalmology consultation on 10/24/17. Ophthalmology is the branch of medicine that deals with the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Review of that consultation revealed the resident was to return to the ophthalmology clinic in 6 months- 4/18. Further record review revealed the facility staff failed to obtain that consultation. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 8/31/18 at 2:00 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to obtain the follow up ophthalmology consultation for Resident #53. Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to follow up and ensure ophthalmology services were obtained for Resident # 86. This is evident for 2 of 48 residents selected for review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures ulcers for residents with pressure ulcers (Residents #80 and #86). This was evident for 2 out of 48 residents selected for review during the investigation stage of the survey process. A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according the their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II (superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III (full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable (Full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough (yellow, tan, gray, green or brown) and/or eschar (tan, brown or black) in the wound bed). The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #80's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-31 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a resident received proper foot care and treatment (Resident #86). This was evident for 1of 48 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: Review of Resident #86's medical record revealed the Resident was last seen by the podiatrist on 2/26/18 for the care of elongated, thickened toenails bilaterally and a callous on the side of the left foot. Podiatrists are health care professionals who have been trained to prevent, diagnose, treat and rehabilitate abnormal conditions of the feet and lower limbs. They can also treat and alleviate day-to-day foot problems, including: toenail problems, such as thickened, fungal or ingrown toenails. corns and calluses. Review of the Podiatrist's progress note reveals the Podiatrist documented RTC (return to clinic) in 2 to 3 months. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #86 has not been seen by the Podiatrist since 2/26/18. Observation of Resident #86 on 8/29/18 at 10:39 AM with facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to apply fall mats as ordered and failed to place the bed in low position for Resident #55; in addition failed to prevent Resident #110 from taking food off the lunch delivery cart and eating it. This was evident for 2 of 48 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: 1 A. The facility staff failed to place a fall mat next the resident's bed as ordered. Medical record review for Resident #55 revealed on 1/8/18 the physician ordered: floor mat at bedside, remove mat when resident is not in bed. Bedside fall mats are safety features that are placed on the floor at the side of the bed. Fall mats are made from high-impact foam and are designed to help prevent injury from potential falls. Surveyor observation of Resident #55's room on 8/27/18 at 12:00 PM, 8/28/18 at 12:40 PM and 8/29/18 at 7:35 AM revealed the resident in bed; however, the facility staff failed to place a fall mat next to the bed as ordered. The fall mat was observed folded and placed against…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain weights as ordered for Resident (#110). This was evident for 1 of 48 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #110 revealed on 5/25/18 the physician ordered: weigh 3 times a week due to weight gain, every day shift every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Observation of medical record revealed the facility staff failed to obtain weights on 6/8/18 and 6/15/18 (Fridays) as ordered by the physician. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 8/31/18 at 2:00 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to obtain weights as ordered on Resident #110. Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to monitor a resident consumption of nutritional juice drink three times a day. (Resident #42)). This was evident for 1 of 48 residents selected for review during the investigation stage of the survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident # 42 revealed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-31 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the Physician following a resident's (#48) significant weight loss and change in condition. This was evident for 1 of 48 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: Medical record review revealed that Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Malnutrition; Adult Failure to thrive and Major Depressive Disorder. A Physicians order dated 4/10/18 for Weight on admission, next day and weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly. Following a change in condition on 5/19/18 Resident #48 was admitted to the hospital, returning to the facility on 6/21/18 with a G-tube which was placed due to Malnutrition and weight loss. A gastrostomy tube (also called a G-tube) is a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach and is one way of providing nutrients and calories for someone who is unable to take…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the consultant pharmacist failed to identify and bring to the facility staff's attention Resident #19 not receiving Levemir as ordered by the physician. This was evident for 1 of 48 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #19 revealed on 3/7/18 the physician ordered: Levemir 30 units at hour of sleep. Levemir is a long-acting injectable insulin that can be used for long-term management of diabetes. Insulin is a hormone that is naturally produced in the body by the pancreas. It helps convert the glucose (sugar) in the bloodstream into energy. This energy is then distributed to cells throughout the body. On 5/30/18 the physician ordered: finger stick 2 times a day, morning and night, call physician if below 60 or above 400. Finger sticks are a way of testing the concentration of glucose in the blood. Particularly important in diabetes management, a blood glucose test is typically performed by piercing the skin (typically, on the finger) to draw…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Resident #100 was free from unnecessary medications. This was evident for 1 out of 48 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #100 revealed on 7/17/18 the physician ordered: Urine culture. Further record review revealed the facility staff obtained the urinalysis as ordered. Urinalysis is a simple test and can provide many useful information about various diseases and conditions. Urine can be evaluated by its physical appearance (color, cloudiness, odor, clarity), also referred to as a macroscopic analysis. It can be also analyzed based on its chemical and molecular properties, including microscopic assessment. Urine culture and sensitivity (C&S) a microscopic study of the urine culture performed to determine the presence of pathogenic bacteria in patients with suspected urinary tract infection. The results of the C+S will guide the physician to determine if antibiotics are needed and which medication would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure resident medications were properly secured. This was true for 1 out of the 3 nursing units. Findings include: This surveyor observed the medication cart for the first-floor unit to be unlocked and unattended on [DATE] at 12:10 PM. Drawers filled with medications which could be opened and pose a risk to any resident opening the drawers. The Certified Medication Aid (CMA) was observed in a resident's room at the bedside administering medications. This surveyor was standing by the medication cart when the CMA returned. CMA was interviewed, and the findings were explained to her. Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to dispose of expired medical supplies on 1 of 3 nursing units observed. Observation was made on [DATE] at 9:15 AM of a bag with 25 blue top blood collection tubes with an expiration date of [DATE]; 1 Blood culture bottle with an expiration date of [DATE] and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-31 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain laboratory blood work as ordered by the physician for Resident (#53). This was evident for 1 of 48 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #53 revealed on 6/22/18 the physician ordered: CBC, CMP, Mg, P, BNP, FLP, TSH and free T4. A complete blood count (CBC) is a test that measures the cells that make up the blood: red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. The comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) is a blood test that gives doctors information about the body's fluid balance, levels of electrolytes like sodium and potassium, and how well the kidneys and liver are working. Magnesium testing may be ordered as a follow up to chronically low blood levels of calcium and potassium. It also may be ordered when a person has symptoms that may be due to a magnesium deficiency, such as muscle weakness, twitching, cramping, confusion, cardiac arrhythmias, and seizures. Phosphorus is a mineral the body needs to build…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-08-31 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon resident interview, staff interview and medical record review it was determined that facility staff failed to assist a resident in obtaining routine and emergency dental care. This was evident for 2 of 48 residents (#57 and #64) selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: 1. During interview with Resident #57 on 8/27/18 at 12:21 PM, he/she stated he/she would like to be seen by the dentist. Observation of the Resident at that time revealed the Resident has missing teeth, broken teeth and decayed teeth with blackened roots. Review of Resident #57's medical record revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed on 10/13/17 and the facility staff coded the Resident in Section L Oral/Dental Status as Obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. The facility staff also documented in a MDS note at that time, Missing several teeth, remaining are broken and decayed. On 7/10/18 the facility staff documented in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to properly maintain the temperature of the first-floor resident nourishment refrigerator. This was evident during the review of the Medication Storage room. The findings include: Observation was made on 8/31/18 at 12:38:PM of the Resident Nourishment refrigerator found to be at 24 degrees with a frozen ½ gallon of milk labeled with a resident's name and a bag with 4 frozen plums. The unit manager was present and made aware of this concern. According to the Center for Disease Control the refrigerator should be maintained between 35- 46 degrees. In an interview with the Director of Nursing on 8/31/18 at 12:55 PM she was made aware of this concern.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-08-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a medical record in the most complete and accurate form (Resident #80). This was evident for 1 of 48 residents selected for review during the investigation stage of the survey process. The findings include: Review of Resident #80's medical record revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has a physician order on 7/22/17 for weekly weights. Further review of the Resident's medical record revealed the facility staff has not obtained weekly weights since 8/9/17. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 8/30/18 at 8:13 AM revealed the Resident should be on monthly weights and the order is incorrect. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 8/30/18 at 8:13 AM confirmed the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate medical record.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Crystal SpringsElkins, WV 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glen BurnieGlen Burnie, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At HomewoodBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Long GreenBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at GreenfieldMilwaukee, WI 1 of 5Nella's At Autumn Lake HealthcareElkins, WV 2 of 5Ashbrook Care & Rehabilitation CenterScotch Plains, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Arlington WestBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Ballenger CreekFrederick, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Baltimore WashingtonGlen Burnie, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At BridgeparkBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At CatonsvilleCatonsville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glade ValleyWalkersville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Loch RavenBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At MadisonMadison, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Memorial BridgePenns Grove, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At NorwalkNorwalk, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At PikesvillePikesville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RuxtonTowson, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Salem CountySalem, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At SouthgateCarneys Point, NJ 2 of 5King David Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBaltimore, MD 2 of 5The Subacute At Autumn Lake HealthcareVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Alice ManorBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Calvert ManorRising Sun, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chesapeake WoodsCambridge, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chevy ChaseChevy Chase, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Patuxent RiverLaurel, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Perring ParkwayBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RiverviewEssex, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Silver SpringSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Spa CreekAnnapolis, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Summit ParkCatonsville, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VinelandVineland, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VoorheesVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At West HartfordWest Hartford, CT 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare Post-Acute Care CenterBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at BeloitBeloit, WI 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at OceanviewOcean View, NJ 3 of 5Cornell Hall Care & Rehabilitation CenterUnion, NJ

Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
6116 BELAIR ROAD HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2022
A&R STERN FAMILY MD7 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2022
SCHWARTZ, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2022
BASKARAN, DEEPAKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2022
GUTTMAN, MOSHEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/07/2023
STERN, ARYEHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/10/2025
ACCURATE STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2022
BRAND SONNENSCHINE LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 11%Other / private 8%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$370per resident / day
operating cost
$11,258per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$406per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215209. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next