Autumn Lake Healthcare At Calvert Manor
1881 Telegraph Road, Rising Sun, MD 21911 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 144 certified beds · (410) 658-6555 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 29% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 26.1% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.7% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.7% | 22.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 2.4% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 44.9% | 22.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 37.0% | 16.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 5.9% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 33.3% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.3% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.4% | 80.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.7% | 21.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.1% | 9.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.75 | 1.33 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.86 | 1.20 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 474 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 72.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 173 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.9%CMS range 51.2–59.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 7.5–12.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 72.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 53.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.5%CMS range 5.9–11.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.21 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 137.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, review of complaint #2719958, and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a grievance resolution was implemented and maintained as evidenced by the facility failing to enforce a resolution preventing Registered Nurse (RN) #23 from providing care to Resident #12 after a grievance resolution mandated RN #23 would not provide care to the resident. This was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #12) of 1 resident reviewed for grievances.The findings include:During telephone interview with Resident #12's family member on 5/20/2026 at 10:03 AM, the family member stated a grievance was filed with the facility in December 2025 regarding the care received by their family member (Resident #12) by RN #23. The family member stated that they had complained to the facility multiple times regarding RN #23 and stated that the resolution to the grievance filed in December 2025 was that RN #23 was not to provide care to Resident #12 in any capacity. On 5/20/2026 at 10:45 AM, review of the grievance showed it was initiated by the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify a Resident's responsible party for a change in condition (Resident #3). This was evident for 1 of 10 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include:Review of Resident #3's medical record on 12/9/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 11:55 AM with a diagnosis to include Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's disease is a type of dementia that affects memory, thinking and behavior.The facility staff assessed the Resident on 9/11/25 at 1:19 PM to be a high risk for wandering/elopement.Further review of the Resident's medical record revealed a nurse's note on 9/11/25 at 6:07 PM that states several attempts to leave unit. Wander Guard placed on right ankle.Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed no notification to Resident #3's responsible party of placement of a Wander GuardDuring interview with Resident #3's responsible party (RP) on 12/10/25 at 11:06 AM, the RP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to administer medications, treatments and supplements as ordered in a timely manner (Resident #3 and #6). This was evident for 2 of 10 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include:1. The facility staff failed to administer medication as ordered for Resident #3.Review of Resident #3's medical record on 12/9/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 11:55 AM with a diagnosis to include dementia. Dementia is a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life.Further review of Resident #3's medical record revealed on 9/11/25 the Resident was ordered Donepezil 5 mg at bedtime for dementia.Review of Resident #3's Medication Administration Record revealed on 9/11/25 at 8:00 PM the Donepezil 5 mg was not administered with a code of 9 (Other/see nurses note).Review of Resident #3's nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a facility reported incidents, record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to timely report an incident of abuse to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This was evident for 6 (#63, #52, #84, #24, #71, #64) of 10 residents reviewed for abuse during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) An investigation into Facility Reported Incident (#MD00203162) on 3/26/25 revealed that Resident #63 told a staff person on 3/2/24 at 8:30 AM that a staff person approached them from behind, lifted them up then dropped them to the floor. The staff person who Resident #63 reported the incident to then informed the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/2/24 at 8:50 AM. According to the facility's investigation file, the DON reported to the state agency (Office of Healthcare Quality - OHCQ) at 12:15 PM on 3/2/24. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was interviewed on 3/26/25 at 8:35 AM. When asked how long does a facility have to report allegations of abuse to the state agency she replied, we have two hours to report abuse. This surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on multiple complaint intakes, record review and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to 1) implement an intervention on a resident's care plan, 2) arrange for a resident with fractured arm to go for an orthopedic appointment, 3A/B) fail to timely administer prescribed medications to residents, 4) Promptly report a positive lab result to the physician and hold laxative for a resident with diarrhea. This was evident for 4 (#132, #140, #230 , #142) of 24 complaints reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 3/25/25 at 11:00 AM review of a complaint intake #MD00202774 had that Resident #132 was admitted to the facility and was having multiple falls secondary to a medical condition and that the facility was not willing to use other measures to keep the resident safe while being rehabilitated. Review of the Change in Condition Concurrent Review Forms on 3/25/25 at 11:22 AM document that resident fell 5 times in February 2024 and 7 times in March…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, Resident (R) and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents for 8 of 29 sampled residents (Residents #3, #110, #64, #14, #231, #116, #24, #51) and 15 complaints (MD00210759, MD00185809, MD00207746, MD00198916, MD00211341,MD00202774, MD00195025, MD00214748, MD00203187, MD00208031, MD00200792, MD00203145, MD00206608, MD00206731, MD00209653) that identified staffing issues and concerns reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: During resident and family interviews, the resident and or family were asked about sufficient nursing staff. An example of a question asked was: do you feel that there is enough staff to meet your needs and concerns without having to wait a long time? Is there a problem with staffing during the week or on weekends? In addition, based on a investigation of complaints there was evidence to support staffing issues. BIMS stands for Brief Interview for Mental Status. The BIMS test is used to get a quick snapshot of how well…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to: 1) ensure secure storage of medications, and 2) ensure a nutritional supplement was not expired. This was evident for: 1) 3 out of 8 medication carts and 2) 1 out of 3 medication room refrigerators containing nutritional supplements during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) While touring the facility on [DATE] at 10:40 AM a medication cart on the ground floor nursing unit a medication cart was observed to be unattended with keys in the lock. Staff #43 came out of a resident's room at 10:42 AM, went to the cart, removed the keys, and locked the cart. She was informed of this observation, and she confirmed it. The Director of Nursing was interviewed on [DATE] at 2:15 PM. She was informed of the unlocked medication cart. She said she would address the issue. 2) While reviewing a clinical record at the 1 south nursing station an unlocked medication cart was observed in the hallway across from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on complaints, observations, record reviews and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were served a meal according to a predetermined menu that incorporated the resident's preferences. This was evident for 4 residents (Residents #25, #59, #65, and #109) out of 14 residents reviewed during the facility's Medicare/Medicaid recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 03/25/2025 at 07:18 AM, the breakfast menu list showed scrambled eggs, oatmeal, toast (jelly and Margarine) and breakfast ham. On 03/25/2025 at 09:08 AM, during a random visit to Resident # 59, his/her meal ticket showed scrambled eggs, coffee/creamer, milk, orange juice, oatmeal, toast (jelly/margarine) and breakfast ham. On the actual meal tray the surveyor saw French toast, cranberry juice, coffee, milk and egg patty. On 03/25/2025, at 9:10 AM, in an interview with Resident #59, when asked if he/she had requested the meals on his/her meal tray and not the one on his/her meal ticket, he/she stated that he/she ate whatever they served…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the surveyor's observation and interviews with staff members, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food in the storage and refrigerator was labeled and dated with preparation and expiration dates. This was observed during the initial tour of the kitchen during the facility's Medicare/Medicaid recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 03/24/25 at 08:51 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, the surveyor observed that one of the 10 shelves in the storage area contained two bags of dry pasta without dates or labels. On 03/24/2025 at 08:55 AM on the same day, the surveyor requested dual observation and shared concerns with Staff #8. Staff #8 removed the bags and stated that they would be discarded, as the date they were received, the date they were opened, and the expiration date were unknown. On 03/24/2025 at 09:02 AM, during the tour of the walk-in refrigerator, the surveyor observed six trays of Tater Tots (small, crispy, bite-sized potato nuggets typically made from shredded and seasoned potatoes, then deep-fried or baked until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure residents received two showers a week per resident preference. This was evident for 2 (Resident #59, and #66) out of the 66 residents in the survey sample. The findings include: 1. When this surveyor entered the Resident #59's room on 3/25/25 at 8:25 AM, the resident was in bed and the resident's hair appeared to be greasy. This surveyor interviewed Resident #59 on 3/25/25 at 8:29 AM. This surveyor asked if the facility nursing staff honor a resident's preference for getting a shower. The resident stated that they would like two showers each week. The resident said a shower had been scheduled for that day but usually only gets one shower a week. A review of the resident's shower sheets on 3/27/25 at 1:35 PM for the months of January, February, and March revealed that the resident was not receiving two showers a week. The resident received 3 showers in January, 6 showers in February, and 5 showers in March. There were no indications that the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident information was protected from public view. This was evident for one computer screen observed to have resident information exposed during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 3/26/25 at 1:19PM the surveyor observed a medication cart outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] with an open computer screen present which was observed to be unlocked and unattended and openly displayed the following information: resident names, resident medical record numbers, resident room numbers, and resident photos for the following residents: #17, #76, #21, #5, #381, #59, #23, #63, #379, and #103. The surveyor shared their concern with Unit Manager #16 who observed and acknowledged the surveyor's concern. On 3/26/25 at 1:21PM the surveyor shared their concern with Registered Nurse (RN) #29 who confirmed and acknowledged understanding of the surveyor's concern. At this time RN #29 reported to the surveyor that there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to exercise reasonable care for protection of resident's property from loss or theft. This was true for one resident (Resident #24) of 66 residents reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey. Findings Included: On 03/25/25 at 10:43 AM, in a interview with Resident #24, it was revealed that a total of $840 in cash was stored in the resident's wallets and kept at the bedside. The resident stated that the $840 was stolen (date not provided), the resident stated that $135 of the money was later returned in February 2025 but the resident was unsure what happened to the remaining balance. Resident #24 stated that he reported it to the unit manager (unable to provide a name) but no-one came back to say what happened after they completed their investigation. They provided a locked drawer but the resident stated that anyone can open it with a small tool, if they really wanted to. On 03/31/25 at 11:35 AM GNA #53 was asked what do they do if an item for a resident went missing and she stated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews and medical record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to investigate an alleged abuse of a resident. This was evident for 1 (#64) of 66 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 03/24/25 at 10:20 AM, during the survey screening, Resident #64 informed a surveyor that GNA#31 got a hold of my feet and legs and pull me on the side of the bed and since that day my legs have been hurting. The resident also stated that GNA #31 pinched her thighs while assisting with pulling up her pants and when GNA#31 assisted with rolling her over, the Resident hit her thigh on the rail. The Resident stated that GNA #31 seemed irritated. On 04/01/25 at 11:32 AM, on observation, Resident #64 was lying in bed in a hospital gown. This Surveyor conducted a follow up interview. The Resident stated that she informed the Unit Manager #17 that GNA #31 had pinched her thighs and rough handled her legs while assisting her back to bed three weeks ago. An interview was conducted on 04/01/25 11:47 AM with Unit Manager…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the care plan of a resident was comprehensive and person centered. This was evident for one (Resident #26) out of two residents reviewed for limited range of motion during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 4/1/25 at 8:21AM the surveyor conducted a review of the medical record for Resident #26 which revealed the following medical order dated as beginning on 3/7/25 was in place for care of the resident: SPLINT ORDER: Order for R (right) elbow extension splint on R (right) elbow, wearing schedule: AM to PM shift or as tolerated Hygiene: Wash weekly or as needed; every shift for contracture prevention/management 1) Check splint cleanliness/condition 2) Check skin integrity pre/post application 3) Perform ROM as needed 4) Fasten straps, if applicable 5) Monitor device during use as needed, notify nursing/rehab/MD with any unusual findings. On 4/1/25 at 8:31AM the surveyor reviewed the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a complete medical order for a foley catheter was re-instituted for a resident upon their return from hospitalization, and failed to ensure that complete medical orders were verified and obtained for the foley catheter upon re-insertion of the catheter. This was evident for one (Resident #115) out of two residents reviewed for catheters during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 3/31/25 at 11:29AM the surveyor reviewed the medical record of Resident #115 which revealed the following medical order was in place dated as beginning on 2/17/25: Foley Cath 22 FR/Balloon size 10ML Dx (diagnosis) Stage 4 Wound Care every shift, and the following order dated as beginning on 12/4/24: Change foley catheter prn (as needed) if dislodged or leaking as needed. On 3/31/25 at 11:29AM the surveyor reviewed the medical record and observed orders in place for care of a foley catheter for Resident #115 which were dated as beginning on 12/4/24. Further review of the medical order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to 1) properly date label oxygen tubing when changed, 2) follow physician's orders for the administration of oxygen, and 3) develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan with resident centered goals for respiratory care to include oxygen therapy. This was evident for 1 (Resident #57) of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Oxygen (O2) therapy is a treatment that provides you with extra oxygen to breathe in. It is also called supplemental oxygen. It is only available through a prescription from your health care provider. On 3/25/2025 at 10:55 AM, surveyor observed Resident #57 sitting in a wheelchair in their room. The resident was wearing a nasal cannula (a device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into your nose) that was connected to a humidifier (water) bottle connected to an oxygen concentrator set at 2LPM (liters per minute). The LPM oxygen flow rate of 2 indicates that 2 liters of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews and interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident was given pain medication consistent with professional standards of practice, and failed to ensure pain mangement was effective. This was evident for 3 (#231,#33, #71) of 4 residents reviewed for pain management during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) During an initial pool screen of Resident #231 on 3/25/2025 at 8:17 AM, the resident was observed in bed crying and complaining of pain. Resident #231 rated the pain at 8/10 (severe pain) to the right hip and 7/10 right foot. The resident stated s/he had been waiting for pain medication since 3 AM that morning and was just given pain med by the day shift nurse. The resident added that s/he had asked for ice pack to be placed on their right hip but the night nurse told them none was available. Resident #231 further stated that they messed up my meds and s/he waited for over 12 hours when s/he was admitted before they could give him/her pain medication. The resident stated that the nurses were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of staff records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) received a performance review in 2023. This was evident for 1 (Staff #49) out of 3 GNAs randomly selected nursing staff records reviewed for annual training requirements during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: The employee files of three GNAs were reviewed on 03/31/25 at 1:30 PM. There was no performance evaluation found for staff # 49 during the review. On 04/01/25 11:21 AM an interview was conducted with the DON regarding performance evaluation. When asked by the surveyor who is responsible for ensuring staff have an annual performance evaluation, the DON stated that it's the responsibility of the DON and unit managers. The DON did not provide any further documentation of the evaluation and stated that the employee worked as needed (PRN) and was overlooked.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medication order parameters were followed and ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medication. This was evident for one (Resident #42) out of one resident reviewed for insulin during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 3/31/25 at 8:59AM the surveyor conducted a review of the medical record for Resident #42 which revealed the following active medical order for insulin administration dated 8/24/24 was in place which included parameters: Lyumjev KwikPen 100 UNIT/ML Solution pen-injector (Insulin); Inject 15 unit subcutaneously with meals for DM (Diabetes Mellitus) Hold for BS (blood sugar) <150. On 3/31/25 at 9:01AM the surveyor reviewed the medical record which revealed a medication administration record (MAR) for March 2025 in which RN #29 documented administration of insulin to Resident #42 in their right arm on 3/23/25 at 5:20PM with a documented blood sugar of 134 despite the parameter in the medical order for the medication to be held for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a prn (as needed) antipsychotic medication order was limited to 14 days and failed to ensure a resident was free from uneccessary medication. This was evident for one (Resident #116) out of eight residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 3/26/25 at 11:38AM the surveyor reviewed the medical record of Resident #116 which revealed the following prn (as needed) medication order for the antipsychotic medication, Seroquel which was observed to have a thirty day duration beginning on 3/7/25: Seroquel 50 milligrams, Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for agitation/anxiety for 30 days which was in addition to a separate order for daily administration of Seroquel. On 3/26/25 at 12:10PM the surveyor conducted an interview regarding prn (as needed) anti-psychotic medication orders with the facility's Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) who reported that they have had physicians say we are gonna keep this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to have the required members participate on the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee meetings. The findings include: On 4/2/2025 at 11:25 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) provided the quality assurance committee meeting attendance sheets from January 2024 through February 2025. Review of the attendance sheets failed to reveal that the following staff routinely attended the quality assurance committee meetings: · The medical director failed to attend the meeting for February 2024 (2/27/2024). · The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) failed to attend the meetings for April 2024 (4/23/2024), September 2024 (9/24/2024), and October 2024 (10/22/2024). · Both the Director of Nursing (DON) and the ADON failed to attend the meeting for August 2024 (8/27/2024). On 4/2/2025 at 1:31 PM, an interview was conducted with the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) representative, Staff #14. Staff #14 reviewed the attendance records and sign-in sheets from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a complaint incident MD00198278, record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide shower to a resident who was dependent. This was evident for 1 (Resident #140) of 24 complaints reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 3/28/25 at 1:48PM review of a complaint incident #MD00198278 had that the facility failed to give Resident #140 a shower for a month after admission to the facility. That resident was dependent on the staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Review of the medical records on 3/28/25 at 1:48PM showed that Resident #140 was admitted on [DATE] to the facility for rehabilitation and review of the care plan with initiation date of 9/7/23 had the resident has an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit r/t Activity Intolerance, Fatigue, Musculoskeletal, Interventions include to assist with personal hygiene such as bathing and grooming. On 3/31/28 at 10:40 AM a review of the resident's shower schedule from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a complaint #MD00210759, record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately interpret a resident's MOLST form, evidenced by the initiation of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) on a resident with a documented Do Not Resuscitate order. This was evident for 1 (Resident #139) of 24 complaints reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings Include: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) is an emergency procedure that combines chest compressions and rescue breathing to restart a person's breathing or heartbeat when they've stopped. The Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) is a medical document that communicates a patient 's wishes or preferences regarding resuscitation when the patient has no pulse and/or is not breathing. Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) is a medical order that instructs healthcare providers not to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) if a patient's heart or breathing stops. Do not intubate (DNI) is a medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a complaint #MD00210759, record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff lacked proper knowledge required to interpret the MOLST form and on steps to follow in an emergency, as evidenced by performing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) on a resident with a documented Do Not Resuscitate order. This was evident for 1 (Resident #139) of 24 complaints reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings Include: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) is an emergency procedure that combines chest compressions and rescue breathing to restart a person's breathing or heartbeat when they've stopped. The Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) is a medical document that communicates a patient 's wishes or preferences regarding resuscitation when the patient has no pulse and/or is not breathing. Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) is a medical order that instructs healthcare providers not to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) if a patient's heart or breathing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-12-17 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on resident interview and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to respect a resident's personal property by not delivering a resident's mail unopened. This was evident for 1 (Resident #66) resident reviewed for personal property during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: In an interview with Resident #66 on 12/12/18 at 1:23 PM, Resident #66 indicated that s/he received a small gift in the mail in December 2017 and that the package had been opened by someone before it had arrived at his/her room. Resident #66 stated that someone removed everything from inside the package and then replaced the items. Resident #66 also stated that the package was clearly addressed to him/her stated nothing was missing. In an interview with the facility director of nursing (DON) and the corporate nurse consultant on 12/13/18 at 2:00 PM, the facility DON stated that s/he was the person who opened Resident #66's mailed gift in December 2017. The facility DON stated that s/he thought the mailed package may have been medical supplies for Resident #66.
- Potential for harm · D2018-12-17 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, resident interview and review of documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an individual financial record was available to a resident through quarterly statements and upon request. This was evident for 1 (#66) of 24 residents identified during sample selection. The findings include: During an interview of Resident #66 on 12/12/2018 at 1:22 PM, surveyors asked about any personal funds managed by the facility. Resident #66 reported that he/she had not received their past few month's statements. The resident stated he/she asked a nurse for their September 2018 statement and had not received it yet. Resident #66 had a Brief Interview for Mental State (BIMS) score of 15 which corresponds with the resident being considered cognitively intact. The BIMS test is a screening tool used to assess cognition On 12/14/2018 at 10:26 AM surveyors met with the Business Office Manager (BOM) and inquired about the facility's process for providing statements. The BOM stated that statements were hand delivered to residents or mailed to resident's Power…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to develop a care plan related to the application of a device to treat a resident's edema. This was evident for 1 (Resident #44) of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed a physician's order, dated 08/08/18, that instructed the nursing staff to apply an ace wrap to Resident #44's right lower leg every morning and remove the ace wrap in the evening for the indication of edema. Further review of Resident #44's medical record revealed a nursing progress note, dated 12/11/18, indicating Resident #44 received a skin tear to the right lower leg during a transfer. During an observation of Resident #44 on 12/12/18 at 10:48 AM, Resident #44 was observed with a dressing to the right lower leg area. In an interview with employee #4 on 12/13/18 at 12:33 PM, employee #4 stated that Resident #44 received a skin tear during a transfer on 12/11/18 at approximately 1 PM. Employee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-12-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide interventions for Resident #20 as indicated on the care plan. This was evident for 1 of 1 residents selected for review of nutrition based care plans and 1 of 30 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: 1A. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #20 with a sippy cup without a lid. Medical record review revealed on 9/13/18, the facility staff initiated a care plan to address nutritional status. The care plan include the following intervention: sippy cup with no lid. The sippy cup is a 2 sided handled cup and has a lid with a spout that allows for slow drinking. Surveyor observation of Resident #20's breakfast on 12/13/18 at 8:45 AM revealed the facility staff failed to provide Resident #20 with a sippy cup. Observation of Resident #20's lunch on 12/13/18 at 12:30 PM revealed Resident #20 had a sippy cup; however,the facility staff placed a lid on the cup. Observation of Resident #20's lunch on 12/14/18 at 12:40 PM revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to follow a physician's order to treat a resident's edema. This was evident for 1 (Resident #44) of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed a physician's order, dated 08/08/18, that instructed the nursing staff to apply an ace wrap to Resident #44's right lower leg every morning and remove the ace wrap in the evening for the indication of edema. Further review of Resident #44's medical record revealed a nursing progress note, dated 12/11/18, indicating Resident #44 received a skin tear to the right lower leg during a transfer. A further review of Resident #44's medical record revealed nursing documentation that indicated Resident #44's 12/11/18 day shift nurse had signed off that Resident #44's ace wrap had been applied at 10:25 AM on the morning of 12/11/18. During an observation of Resident #44 on 12/12/18 at 10:48 AM, Resident #44 was observed with a dressing to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-12-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on reviews of a medical record, administrative records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide a resident with a safe environment, during a shower, to prevent the resident from sliding out of a shower chair onto the floor. This was evident for 1 (Resident #22) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #22 medical record on 12/12/18 revealed a nursing note indicating Resident #22 had slid out of a shower chair onto the floor while receiving a shower on 10/31/17. Review of Resident #22's fall prevention care plan on 12/14/18 revealed Resident #22 was at risk for falls due to cognitive loss, gait and transfer dysfunction, and vision impairment. Reviews of nursing interventions to prevent Resident #22 from falling included: to ensure proper use of devices as ordered and specified on the ADL care plan, to evaluate medications which may increase risk for falls, and ensure resident has proper shoes on. Further review of Resident #22's care plans failed to reveal any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-12-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determine the facility staff provided Resident #20 with straws, even though there was a physician's order for no straws. This was evident of 1 of 2 residents selected for review of nutrition during the survey process and 1 of 30 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #20 revealed on 9/19/18 the physician ordered: no straws. Surveyor observation of Resident #20's breakfast on 12/13/18 at 8:45 AM revealed Resident #20 was served a carton of low fat milk and a carton on apple juice; however, the facility staff placed a straw into each of those liquids. On subsequent observations of Resident #20's meals throughout the survey process, no further notation of straws were noted. Interview with the corporate nurse on 12/14/18 at 2:00 PM revealed the facility staff provided Resident #20 with milk and apple juice with straws. Interview with the Director of Nursing and corporate nurse on 12/17/18 at 1:00 PM confirmed the facility staff provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-12-17 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain laboratory blood specimen as ordered by the physician for Resident #75. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident selected for review of laboratory services and 1 out of 30 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #75 revealed on 9/6/18 the physician ordered BMP in 1 week. Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP). The Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) can be used to evaluate kidney function, blood acid/base balance, and levels of blood sugar, and electrolytes. Components of the BMP are four electrolytes: sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine and glucose. Further record review revealed the facility staff failed to obtain the laboratory blood test as ordered by the physician. Interview with the south side unit manager on 12/13/18 at 10:00 AM revealed the facility staff failed to obtain laboratory blood test as ordered. Interview with the Director of Nursing and Corporate nurse on 12/17/18 at 1:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview of facility staff, it was determined that food service employees failed to ensure safe food handling practices were followed to reduce the risk of food-borne illness. The findings include: During a tour of the kitchen on 12/14/2018 at 10:00 AM surveyors observed an upright mixer placed directly adjacent to a hand-washing sink that did not have splash guards. The mixer had an open top and was being used to mix chocolate mousse at the time of observation. The close proximity to the hand sink and lack of splash guards put the mixer at high risk of contamination from splashes when the hand sink was in use. Surveyors interviewed the Director of Food and Nutrition who stated that the mixer could be moved and splashguards put in place. The DOFN was made aware of these findings on 12/14/2018 at 10:10 AM.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1881 TELEGRAPH ROAD HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 08/01/2022 |
| 1881 TELEGRAPH ROAD PROPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2022 |
| SCHWARTZ, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/01/2022 |
| ACCURATE STAFFING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/12/2025 |
| NAJERA, MARGARET | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2022 |
| AS FAMILY MD4 HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2022 |
| BRAND SONNENSCHINE LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2022 |
| M MEISELS FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2022 |
| DUNN, DAVID | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $6.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215189. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.