No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Autumn Lake Healthcare At Pikesville

7 Sudbrook Lane, Pikesville, MD 21208 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 140 certified beds · (410) 486-8771 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609) — most recent Jun 2025Resident-funds citation (F0570)1 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
19 Walker Ave Ste 304 · (410) 580-1220 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1116 Reisterstown Rd · (410) 653-6061 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1000 Reisterstown Rd · (267) 667-7711 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Duck Pond At Druid Ridge · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1st Church<0.1 mi
1 Church Ln · (410) 821-7798

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.4%20.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.4%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.9%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.0%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.0%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.1%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%5.9%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.6%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.4%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.1%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.2%80.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.3%21.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.5%9.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.261.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.321.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 135 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
75.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 75.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.0%CMS range 48.7–67.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 7.3–13.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge75.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting87.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 4.4–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.431.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.57
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.68
RN hoursweekends
47.9%
Total nursing turnover
26.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 117.2 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-18)
47
at the previous standard inspection (2022-08-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

61 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2022-08-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records and facility investigation documentation, interviews and observations it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system in place to prevent residents with cognitive impairment from leaving the facility without appropriate supervision. More specifically, the facility failed to: 1.) Provide adequate supervision to prevent a resident with known wandering and exit seeking behaviors from exiting the facility unsupervised on 5/10/21, 2.) Ensure all staff check the functionality of the wander guard bracelets for residents currently in the facility with a bracelet in place that have exit seeking behavior; 3.) have an elopement risk binder on all nursing units and educate all staff on the location and purpose of the elopement risk binder and 4.) educate all staff, including agency staff to monitor their surroundings when entering and exiting the facility. These actions resulted in the finding of an Immediate Jeopardy which was identified on 8/2/22 at 9:40 AM. This deficient practice was evident for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #208, #84)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation rounds and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program that properly identified the isolation necessary for residents, maintain infection prevention standards during resident care, and properly store and process linens to prevent the spread of infection to residents following accepted national standards. This was evident for 5 (#15, #110, #66, #45, and #89) of 55 residents and 1 of 2 of the laundry rooms observed during survey. The findings include: Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP): Enhanced Barrier Precautions are used as an infection control intervention that uses targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities in nursing homes to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). 1. During initial observation rounds and medical record review on 06/11/25 at 07:45 AM for Resident #15 surveyor observed an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) sign present on the resident room door, however no Infection Control supplies observed near or within room for staff to use to maintain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews with residents and facility staff and record reviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents choices for discharge were properly facilitated by the facility staff. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #17 and #91) out of 4 residents reviewed for Choices during the facility's survey. Findings include: 1. An interview was conducted with Resident #17 on 6/11/25 at 1:20 PM and the resident was asked the question, if s/he can make choices about their daily life. The resident stated that s/he would like to have a private place to live. The resident went on to say that s/he would like to have family and friends visit where there is privacy, no restrictions and can go outside and get fresh air whenever s/he desires. Resident # 17 stated that s/he would like to be in a place where there are healthy and highly functioning people like him/her, and not in a place surrounded by people who are much older. The resident went on to say that the discharge process was started three times previously and not completed due to staff leaving, and that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Medicare beneficiaries with 1) Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage and 2) Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage. This was evident for 2 (Residents #50 and #72) out of 3 residents selected during the Beneficiary Protection Reviews. The findings include: The Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage form (CMS-10055) provides information to residents/beneficiaries that services may no longer be covered by Medicare and addresses the resident's liability for payment should they wish to continue receiving the skilled services. The Notice of Medicare Non-coverage form (CMS-10123) informs the beneficiary of his/her right to file an appeal of the decision and the right to an expedited review of Medicare non-coverage of services. 1) On 06/17/25 at 11:58 AM, a review of the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form (CMS-20052, completed by the facility, indicated that Residents #50 and #72 were not provided with the Skilled Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, in good repair and functional environment and building. This was evident during observations made on the 1 [NAME] Wing of the facility and resident room [ROOM NUMBER] during the survey. The findings include the following: During observation rounds on 06/11/2025 at approximately 12:45 PM with Environmental Service Director staff #6 and Maintenance Director staff #5, the facility housekeeping closet located on 1 west wing was found to have approximately 2 inches of standing water, dark green and black in color, in the floor drain area with a smell of musty, earthy, and decaying wood pungent odor. Staff #6 verified the observation and stated that the drain was clogged, and the drain area and pipes need to be cleaned. During observation rounds and interview on 06/11/2025 at approximately 12:50 PM with Maintenance Director staff #5 the facility utility room located on 1 west wing was found to have a toilet bowl…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on administrative record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility staff failed to report allegations of abuse immediately. This was found to be evident for Resident #19 out of 5 intakes reviewed for abuse allegations during the facility's survey. Findings include: MD00206887 was reviewed on 6/16/25 at 10:00AM for allegations of abuse to Resident #19. According to the facility's investigation, and a statement by GNA #21, it indicated that she witnessed a Nurse #22 verbally and physically abuse the resident. Further review of the investigation found that the GNA (#21) did not report this allegation immediately. Abuse was unsubstantiated. An interview was conducted with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing on 6/16/25 at 4:00PM and the Administrator was asked to explain what the expectation of staff is when abuse is witnessed, and he stated the following: The staff member is to immediately tell someone in management about it. He went on to say that all staff are trained during onboarding and that GNA (#21) was expected to adhere to these…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3) On 06/13/25 at 02:07 PM, Resident #97's record was reviewed. The record review revealed that Resident #97's Care Plan Conference Summary sheet, dated 04/28/25, indicated that the Activities Director #26, Unit Manager (Licensed Practical Nurse) #4, Dietician #27 and Social Work Director staff #8 were the only interdisciplinary team members who participated in updating Resident #97's care plan on 04/28/25. According to Resident #97's Care Plan Conference Summary sheet, dated 04/28/25, the attending physician as well as a registered nurse and a nurse aide, with responsibility to the resident, did not participate in updating Resident #97's care plan on 04/28/25. Also, the facility did not provide the surveyor with documentation indicating that the attending physician, registered nurse and nurse aide communicated their updates to Resident #97's care plan. On 06/13/25 at 03:28 PM, staff #8 was interviewed. During the interview, the surveyor made staff #8 aware that, according to Resident #97's Care Plan Conference…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors as evidenced by facility staff failing to administer medications in accordance with professional standards. This was evident for 1 (#127) of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration.The findings include:Medication is to be administered according to the five rights of medication administration: right person, right medication, right route, right dosage, and right time.On 6/13/2025 at 11AM, a review of MD00188741 revealed that Resident #127's medications were not given as prescribed by the physician.A record review of Resident #127's medication administration audit for 2/6/23 revealed Resident #127 had received his/her medication late.On 2/6/23, the following medications were administered outside the 1-hour time frame:1. Garlic orals give 100 mg by mouth one time a day. It was scheduled for administration at 9AM, however this medication was administered outside the 1-hour time frame and administered at 3:30 PM.2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure that medical records were maintained and accurate. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #17 and #91) out of 34 residents reviewed during the facility's survey. Findings include: 1. An interview was conducted with Resident # 17 on 6/11/25 at 1:20 PM and the resident was asked the question, if s/he can make choices about their daily life. The resident stated that s/he would like to have a private place to live. The resident went on to say that s/he would like to have family and friends visit where there is privacy, no restrictions and can go outside and get fresh air whenever s/he desires. Resident #17 stated that s/he would like to be in a place where there were healthy and highly functioning people like him/her, and not in a place surrounded by people who are much older. The resident went on to say that the discharge process was started three times previously and not completed due to staff leaving, and that s/he and other residents are waiting for assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Resident #83 bed mattress and bed frame were compatible. This was evident for 1 resident bed out of 25 resident beds reviewed during the survey. The findings include the following: During observation rounds on 06/11/2025 at 8:10 AM Resident #83 was found lying in bed with his/her legs dangling over a gap from the end of the bed mattress to the end of the bed frame footboard. During observation rounds and interview on 06/11/2025 at 11:20 AM, Maintenance Director staff #5, using the facility's measuring tape, measured the gap between the end of Resident #83 bed mattress to the bed frame footboard to be 8 ½ inches. Staff #5 stated that the mattress was the wrong size and did not fit the bed frame.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests. This was evident in 1 resident's bathroom out of 25 residents' bathrooms observed during the survey. The findings include the following: During an interview on 06/11/2025 at 8:02 AM Resident #56 stated that there were many black flying bugs that fly around in the room and around his/her head while they are eating. During observation rounds on 06/11/2025 at 8:05 AM approximately 14 black in color, with wings, pests were found flying around as well as on the walls in residents' room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom and room. During observation rounds and interview on 06/12/2025 at 10:00 AM with the Nursing Home Administrator staff #1 was shown the black in color with wings pests in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and stated that the facility has called the pest control company to treat the room and bathroom.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 50 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-11 · tag F0570 — widespread
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility documentation review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide evidence the facility had purchased a surety bond to assure the security of all the residents' personal funds deposited with the facility. This was evident during the investigation of facility tasks during an annual survey. The findings include: On 8/9/22 at 11:45 AM, an inquiry was made with lobby receptionist (Staff #47) as to where the business office was located. It was revealed that the facility did not have a business office and she was responsible for passing out resident funds. Upon further questioning she indicated that she receives a weekly ledger listing the individual residents' current personal funds balances for the residents that have their personal funds managed by the facility. The receptionist showed the balance dated 8/3/22 of all residents' personal funds held by the facility was $59,541.00. She was asked as the total amount of the Surety bond. She expressed that she was unaware of a Surety bond. Surety bond is an agreement between the principal (the facility), the surety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident/responsible party was offered the opportunity to develop an advanced directive for 15 (#46, #76, #17, #87, #18, #28, #67, #1, #22, #49, #61, #95, #24, #75, #307) of 16 sampled residents for advanced directives. The findings include: An advance directive is a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor. It is a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity. A Maryland MOLST (Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form is used for documenting a resident's specific wishes related to life-sustaining treatments. The MOLST form includes medical orders for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe and clean environment as evidenced by 1) sagging ceiling tiles in resident rooms, 2) stained ceiling tiles, 3) walls in resident rooms that were in disrepair, 4) soiled linen and trash/debris on the floor and, 5) a rusted tube feeding pole. This was found to be evident throughout both floors of the facility. The findings include: 1) During the facility tours from 7/21/22 to 8/4/22, surveyors observed several resident rooms that had sagging ceiling tiles in their rooms. (Sagging ceiling tiles meant there was a space between the two attached tiles, and it looked like it was stuck down convexly.) -room [ROOM NUMBER] above bed B: the second ceiling tiles from the wall had sagging ceiling tiles. -room [ROOM NUMBER]: sagging tiles were observed above the bathroom entrance on the hallway side. -room [ROOM NUMBER]: sagging tiles were observed above the sink. -room [ROOM NUMBER]: sagging tiles were observed above bed A. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — widespread
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person centered care that were resident specific with measurable objectives and goals. This was evident for 17 (#46, #58, #80, #208, #84, #251, #17, #76, #53, #401, #307, #95, #89, #311, #1, #49, #152 ) of 38 residents reviewed during the annual survey, however affected all residents as only samples were provided in this citation. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) On 7/27/22 at 8:04 AM Resident #46's medical record was reviewed and revealed a diagnosis of unspecified dementia. Review of Resident #46's care plan, has mood problem r/t Disease process cognitive decline will have improved mood state (Specify: happier, calmer appearance, no s/sx of depression, anxiety or sadness) through the review date was not specific to Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — widespread
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of resident medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) hold care plan meetings of the interdisciplinary team for residents at the time of the quarterly revision of their care plan and 2) review and revise resident care plans after each assessment or as resident care needs became apparent or changed over time. This was evident for 2 (#67, #401) of 4 residents reviewed for care plan meetings and 7 (#46, #84, #1, #27, 49, 152, #89) of 38 residents reviewed during the annual survey, however affected all residents on units that did not have a unit manager. The findings include: Care plans are developed for residents to guide the care that residents receive in the facility. They are required to be developed within 7 days of completion of a resident's admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and revised at least every quarter (or more often as needed). The facility is required to have care plans developed and revised by an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-11 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee files and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to put a system in place to ensure that Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) are evaluated annually and provided appropriate re-education based on the outcome of these evaluations. This was found to be true for 5 of 5 GNA employees (Staff #68, #69, #70, #71, #72) reviewed for annual evaluations. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The findings include: On 8/10/22, the Human Resources (HR) Director (staff #78) provided a requested list of the facility's Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) with hire dates. Out of a list of 23 GNAs, 5 employee files were selected at random. A meeting was held with HR at 10:00 AM on 8/10/22 to review the GNA employment files for education and yearly performance Appraisals. 1) Review for GNA (staff #68) with a Date of hire (DOH) 8/1/18 revealed an incomplete employee Job performance appraisal dated 8/1/21. The form showed 11 areas that each employee was evaluated with a number system from 4 = Excellent to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to consistently maintain a sanitary environment in the kitchen. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen and during 2 subsequent visits. The findings include: 1) Dietary staff failed to utilize personal protective equipment (PPE) in a manner that met minimum standards and minimized risk for infectious spread during an active COVID-19 outbreak in the facility. Consistent with the 4/2/2020 CMS guidance, on 4/27/2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published updated guidance which stated, In general, fully vaccinated HCP (health care provider) should continue to wear source control while at work. 1a) Observation was made on 7/21/22 at 8:01 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, of Staff #3 at the food service table plating breakfast with her mask below her chin. Staff #4 was also at the plating table with her mask below her nose. 1b) Observation was made on 7/26/22 at 11:07 AM of lunch being prepared in the kitchen. During an interview with Staff #50, Staff #50 wore her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-11 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of pertinent documentation, observation and interview it was determined that the facility administration failed to 1) ensure that all staff, including agency staff, were educated on elopement prevention, 2) update the facility assessment to address elopement and COVID-19, 3) correct deficiencies from a previous complaint survey and 4) obtain and utilize resources necessary to provide for the needs of the residents. This was evident from 7/21/22 to 8/11/22 (16 days) of the annual survey which resulted in 52 Federal citations and identification of an Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: 1) After an elopement in May 2021 facility administration failed to ensure that all staff were educated regarding elopement and failed to have a process in place to educate agency staff which resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy being identified on 8/2/22 at 9:40 AM. On 8/1/22 a review of facility-reported incident MD00167212 revealed on 5/10/21 at 6:58 AM, Resident #208 eloped from the facility and was brought back to the facility by police at about 8:30 AM on 5/10/21. During the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-11 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility records and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to conduct and document an accurate facility-wide assessment that was up to date. This was evident during review of the sufficient and competent nurse staffing task of the annual survey. This had the potential to affect all residents within the facility. The findings include: A facility-wide assessment is conducted to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The assessment is to include the care required by the resident population considering the types of diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, overall acuity, and other pertinent facts that are present within that population. A copy of the Facility Assessment was provided at the initiation of the survey. The Date of the assessment or Update was 6/30/22. Date assessment reviewed with QAA/QAPI (Quality Assessment and Assurance/ Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee) was 7/19/22. On 8/11/22 at 1:07 PM an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-11 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, reviews of facility and resident records, and current survey findings it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan to ensure care and services are maintained at acceptable levels of performance and continually improved. This had the potential to affect all residents within the facility. The findings include. A copy of the facility's Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan was received at the initiation of the survey. The undated QAPI plan was reviewed, and per the plan, there was no indication that the plan was refined and revisited. Much of the plan was written in generalizations such as Under the section titled Feedback, Data systems and Monitoring the plan stated the facility will put in place systems to monitor care and service, drawing data from multiple sources. Feedback systems will actively incorporate input from staff, residents, families, and others as appropriate. Under the section titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, reviews of facility and resident records, current survey findings and the facility's prior complaint surveys it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to develop and implement effective plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. This failure resulted in 4 repeat deficiencies found during the current annual survey. This was evident during the survey process and review of the Quality Assurance Program. The findings include: On 7/22/22 a review of the survey binder revealed a plan of correction for a complaint survey that ended on 7/29/21. Citation F623 was cited as the facility failed to give a written copy of a resident's transfer notice to the resident/resident representative (RP). The corrective action that the facility stated they were taking was to put measures in place to prevent re-occurrence and that residents would receive a copy of the transfer notice at the time of transfer. The facility documented the RP would be sent a copy of the transfer paper in writing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program and facility staff failed to follow infection control practices and guidelines to prevent the development and transmission of disease by 1) failing to keep contact/isolation room door closed on the 1st East unit. This was evident for 1 (Resident #401) of 15 residents' rooms observed, 2) failing to provide education and convey updates to staff on COVID-19. This was evidenced by 49 out of 115 staff who did not receive COVID-19 education in November 2021, 3) failing to change oxygen tubing and label when changed. This was evidenced by 1 (#76) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care and 4) failed to follow infection control practices in the laundry room and kitchen. This was evident for 5 staff (#3, #4, #51, #15 and #16) observed in the kitchen and laundry room during survey. These practices had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: 1) During observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to keep the second walk-in freezer and dishwasher in the kitchen in safe operating condition. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen and during 2 subsequent visits. The findings include: 1) On 7/21/22 at 8:07 AM observation was made of the second walk-in freezer during the initial tour of the kitchen. There were small mounds of ice covering the inside ceiling of the freezer. Staff #2, the dietary manager stated, when it gets hot and humid in here and when the door is open there is ice build-up. On 7/26/22 at 11:29 AM a second observation was made of the second walk-in freezer. The ceiling had small mounds of ice scattered throughout the ceiling. The District Manager was with the surveyor during the observation and stated, we have had problems for a while with the freezer and that is why the fans are here. There were industrial size fans in the kitchen by the outside of the freezer. 2) Observation was made on 8/5/22 at 10:35 AM in the kitchen of the commercial dish washer running during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, evidenced by 1) ongoing renovation construction in the facility building since October 2019, 2) uncapped sides of handrails at the 2-East wing, 3) broken wall behind the water purifier on the second floor near between 2-West nursing station and medication storage room, and 4) approximately 1.5 cm x 0.5 cm size, rusty, flat metal piece with one side that was sharpened and the other side was flat found on the hallway on the 2nd floor of the facility. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors in the facility. The findings include: 1) Surveyors conducted a facility tour on 7/21/22 at 8:10 AM. During a tour of the facility's second-floor units, surveyors observed carpet on the hallways that was covered with debris from paint, wall scrapings, and wallpaper that was on the entire second floor. At 8:40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-11 · tag F0922 — failed to maintain the building's systems — widespread
    Have enough backup water supply for essential areas of the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, observation, and documentation review it was determined the facility failed to ensure an adequate amount of potable emergency water was always available. This was evident during a tour of the kitchen during the annual survey. This had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 7/21/22 at 8:01 AM an interview was conducted with Staff #50 while in the kitchen. Staff #50 was asked where the emergency water was located. Staff #50 stated the water was in the basement and proceeded to walk with the surveyors to the basement storage room. Observation was made in the basement storage room of 16 cases of water with 4 gallons in each case. There were an additional 26 cases of water on the other side of the room containing 4 gallons each. The total number of gallons of water on hand was 168 gallons. Potable water on hand is calculated at 1 gallon per resident (total bed capacity) x 3 days. The bed capacity for the facility on 7/21/22 was 140 residents. The facility should have had 420 gallons of water on hand to cover 140 residents for 3 days. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee file documentation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to have a process to ensure all Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) have no less than 12 hours of education per year and the education included annual dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training. This is evident for 5 of 5 GNA employment files reviewed and 1 (staff #69) of 5 GNAs that did not have abuse prevention training. This is evident for 5 (#68, #69, #70, #71, #72) of 5 GNA employment files reviewed and 1 (staff #69) of 5 GNAs that did not have abuse prevention training. The findings include: On 8/10/22, the Human Resources (HR) Director (staff #78) provided a requested list of the facility's Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) with hire dates. Out of a list of 23 GNAs, 5 employee files were selected at random. A meeting was held with the HR at 10 AM on 8/10/22 to review the GNA employment files for education and yearly performance Appraisals. The HR director did not have access to employee education files but was requested to obtain staffing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility staff 1) failed to notify the physician that a medication for an elevated potassium level was unavailable and 2) failed to have a system in place to notify the physician when residents' weight loss was identified. This was evident for 1 (Resident #251) of 1 resident reviewed for an unexpected death and 3 (Resident #73, #67, #402) of 7 residents reviewed for weight loss. The findings include: 1) On 8/4/22 at 7:30 AM a review of Resident #251's medical record revealed a 12/17/21 physician's history and physical that documented the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care facility for subacute rehabilitation due to deconditioning. Resident #251 had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation complicated by pneumonia, aortic stenosis, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure. A review of a 1/4/22 physician's note documented that Resident #251 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-11 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and medical record review it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident or with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 3 (#57, #61, #83) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) Resident #57 was initially interviewed on 7/21/22 at 10:37 AM. Resident #57 revealed that he/she was transferred to the hospital on multiple occasions in the past year. A review of resident #57's medical record on 8/3/22 revealed that he/she was transferred to a hospital on the following dates and more 8/24/21, 11/24/21, 2/3/22, 3/24/22, and 7/19/22. Further review of the medical record did not reveal documentation that the resident was informed in writing related to transfers to the hospital on 8/24/21, 11/24/21, and 2/3/22. On 8/3/22 at 2:23 PM an interview was conducted with the unit manager (staff # 48). She was asked, where is the written notifications of transfer. She responded that her previous employer/facility owner kept the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-11 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and medical record review it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of the bed hold policy upon transfer of a resident to an acute care facility. This was evident for 3 ( #57, #61, #83) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) Resident #57 was initially interviewed on 7/21/22 at 10:37 AM. Resident #57 revealed that he/she was transferred to the hospital on multiple occasions in the past year. A review of resident #57's medical record on 8/3/22 revealed that he/she was transferred to a hospital on the following dates and more 8/24/21, 11/24/21, 2/3/22, 3/24/22, and 7/19/22. Further review of the medical record did not reveal copies of the bed hold policy that was to be provided to the resident at the time of each transfer. On 8/3/22 at 2:23 PM an interview was conducted with the unit manager (staff # 48). She confirmed that a copy of the bed hold policy for each transfer was not in the medical record. She added that her previous employer/facility owner kept…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-11 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to conduct a complete assessment by failing to assess a resident's cognition and mood on quarterly MDS assessments. This was evident for 5 (#4, #7, #98, #47 #28) of 38 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) On 7/21/22 at 12:30 PM Resident #4's medical record was reviewed and revealed an incomplete quarterly MDS. Review of the quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/10/22, Section C, Cognitive Patterns, Brief Interview of Mental Status, was not done, however Section C0700, Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-11 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 10 (#53, #87, #57, #58, #80, #208, #251, #28, #67, #311,) of 38 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) On 7/27/22 at 10:30 AM a record review of Resident #53's quarterly MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/6/22, Section N, Medications, documented that the resident received an anti-coagulant for 7 days during the lookback period. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-11 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide the resident or resident representative with a summary of their baseline care plan on admission and failed to accurately assess the resident. This was evident for 6 (#58, #208, #251, #416, #307, #89) of 38 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: A baseline care plan must be prepared for all residents within 48 hours of a resident's admission. Its purpose is to provide the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident until a comprehensive care plan can be completed for the resident. The baseline care plan, along with a copy of their medications, is to be given to the resident and/or resident representative and details a variety of components of the care that the facility intends to provide to that resident. This allows residents and their representatives to be more informed about the care that they receive. 1) On 7/28/22 at 7:47 AM a review of Resident #58's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents with limited range of motion received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decline in range of motion. This was evident for 3 (#17, #53, #55) of 6 residents reviewed for positioning and mobility during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) On 7/25/22 at 12:00 PM an observation was made of Resident #17 sitting in a chair with a right palm protector in place. On 7/26/22 at 10:08 AM a second observation was made of Resident #17 lying in bed without anything in the right hand. Resident #17's right hand was in a fist. On 7/25/22 at 12:00 PM Resident #17's daughter was interviewed and stated that Resident #17's hands were not always like they are now. On 7/27/22 at 1:24 PM Resident #17's medical record was reviewed. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility in December 2018 with diagnoses including but not limited to early onset Alzheimer's disease. Review of physician's orders revealed an order for, Right palm protector continuous wear, that was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-11 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the physician progress notes were not in the resident medical records the day the resident was seen. This was evident for 5 (#46, #80, #55, #67, #65,) of 38 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) On 7/27/22 at 8:04 AM a record review was done for Resident #46. Review of the paper and electronic medical record revealed the last physician's note found in the medical record was from an 8/4/21 visit with an upload to the electronic medical record on 8/11/21. 2) On 7/9/22 at 9:30 AM a review of Resident #80's medical record revealed the last physician's visit that was in the medical record was dated 11/28/21 with an upload date of 12/22/21. The previous note was dated 5/18/21. There were no physician visits noted in-between those 2 notes. A physician's note dated 5/17/22 was found in the labeled other section of the electronic record that was uploaded on 6/13/22. In that note there is documentation of visits dated 12/14/21, 1/18/22, 2/8/22, 3/8/22, 4/15/22, and 5/17/22, however they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility records and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed 1) ensure that nurse aides are able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs and 2) failed to ensure all nursing staff had the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents with a Nephrostomy tube. This was evident for 2 (Staff #71 and #72) of 5 randomly selected GNAs reviewed for competency review and 2 (# 89 and #83) out of 2 residents with Nephrostomy tubes reviewed. The findings include: Competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs includes but is not limited to competencies in areas such as resident Rights, person centered care, communication, basic nursing skills, basic restorative services, skin and wound care, medication management, pain management, Infection control, Identification of changes in condition, and cultural competency. 1) A meeting was held with the Human Resource (HR) Director (staff #78) at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to keep a resident's drug regimen free from unnecessary drugs by failing to 1) monitor the blood pressure and heart rate prior to administering a blood pressure medication and 2) follow physician ordered blood pressure parameters for administering Metoprolol, a blood pressure medication. This was evident for 1 (#80) of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary drugs during the annual survey. The findings include: On 7/29/22 at 7:43 AM a review was conducted of Resident #80's medical record. Review of July 2022 physician's orders revealed the order Metoprolol 25 mg. 1/2 tablet every 12 hours at 8 AM and 8 PM. The order stated to hold the medication if SBP (systolic blood pressure) was less than 110 or HR (heart rate). The top number of the blood pressure refers to the amount of pressure in the arteries during the contraction of the heart muscle. This is called systolic pressure. The bottom number refers to the blood pressure when the heart muscle is between beats. This is called diastolic pressure.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined facility staff 1) failed to keep medication carts locked when unattended and 2) failed to date medication and biologicals when opened, and failed to discard insulin, food supplements, inhalers, and oral medications when expired. This was evident on 2 of 4 nursing units observed during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) On 7/21/22 at 09:01 AM observation was made of an unlocked and unattended medication cart in the hallway outside of room # 208. The surveyor was able to open the drawers to the medication cart to observe insulin, eye drops and resident medications. When LPN #1 came out of a resident's room, the surveyors asked about the unlocked and unattended medication cart. LPN #1 stated, I was right here. I only stepped into the room. The other nurse called me and closed the door. The Director of Nursing (DON) was informed of the observation. 2) On 7/22/22 at 8:07 AM observation was made of a medication room on the first-floor nursing unit.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-11 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to have quality laboratory supplies for resident diagnostic testing in 1 of 2 medication rooms observed during the annual survey. The findings include: Observation was made on [DATE] at 8:07 AM in the first-floor medication room by 2 surveyors of the following expired blood collection tubes that were observed in a light blue bin labeled lab specimen supplies: (14) purple blood collection tubes, Lot #9315422 exp (expiration) 3/31 (13) blue top collection tubes, Lot #0009468 exp [DATE] (3) orange top collection tubes, Lot #0240566 exp [DATE] (5) red top collection tubes, Lot #0218175 exp [DATE] (3) purple top collection tubes, Lot #226552 exp [DATE] (3) blue top collection tubes, Lot # 0184336 exp [DATE] Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #9 was in the medication room at the time of the observation and was asked if the nurses drew blood for residents. LPN #9 stated, when the lab can't get here. On [DATE] at 10:41 AM an interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a medical record in the most accurate form. This was evident for 10 (#251, #84, #76, #53, #18, #28, #61, #401, #73, #24 ) of 38 residents reviewed in the investigative stage of the annual survey. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1a) On 8/4/22 at 7:30 AM a review of Resident #251's medical record revealed a 1/4/22 physician's note, Lab work today is being ordered stat. A review of the written physician's orders sheet dated 1/4/22 had the order, give Lokelma 10 gm x 1 for hyperkalemia. The order sheet did not have a time that the order was written. Review of the electronic order in the facility's electronic medical record system…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, complaints from anonymous staff, and facility documentation review, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program, so the facility was free of pests. This practice had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. The findings include: During multiple observations in the facility building from 7/25/22 to 7/29/22, the surveyor observed dead bugs, crawling bugs, and flying bugs. -On 7/25/22 at 10:44 AM, a black, pinky nail-sized, smashed dead bug was found in front of room [ROOM NUMBER]. -On 7/25/22 at 7:49 AM, a dark brown, about 1.5 inches long, a smashed bug was found between room [ROOM NUMBER] and the medication room. -On 7/26/22 at 7:28 AM, a brown, pinky nail size dead bug was found on the 1st floor in front of the women's locker room. -On 7/26/22 at 8:39 AM, a dark brown, ring fingernail size, dead bug was found on the right side of the nursing office's director. -On 7/27/22 at 6:47 AM, a pinky finger size,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to: 1) protect and value resident's private space by failing to knock and request permission before entering a resident's room, and 2) ensure a urine collection bag had a privacy cover and was out of sight of the public. This was evident but not limited to 1 of 7 residents (Resident #57) reviewed on the 1 [NAME] Unit and 1 (#83) of 4 residents reviewed for urinary catheters during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) An interview was conducted with Resident #57 in the resident's room with the door closed on 8/3/22. At 1:41 PM a couple of knocks were heard and without any acknowledgement from resident #57 an employee entered the room. The employee did not excuse herself, interrupted the interview and proceed to place supplies into a dresser drawer. Upon the employee's exit from the room, resident #57 identified the employee (Staff # 75) from central supply. Resident #57 commented and implied that the staff entering the room unannounced is routine. The unit manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of complaint MD00177146, medical record review, observations, and interviews with the resident, and facility staff, it was determined that the facility 1) failed to optimize the living environment for a resident with a request to add weather-stripping to the bottom of the resident's bedroom door and 2) failed to ensure access to the nurse call bell for residents residing in the facility. This was evident for 1 (complaint MD00177146) of 4 complaints reviewed for Resident #50 and 1 (Resident #53) of 32 residents reviewed during the initial stage of the annual survey. The findings include: 1) Review of complaint MD00177146 revealed a concern that the facility did not meet an agreed upon request to install weather stripping along the bottom of the resident's door to accommodate resident #50's request to maintain the air quality in the room. Review of resident #50's medical record on 8/2/22 revealed a social service Care Plan: quarterly resident meeting note dated 6/17/22 with the following statement: Resident request structural adjustment to the bottom of his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy and facility documentation review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to implement their policy regarding reporting allegations of abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property. This was evident for 2 (#58, #412) of 8 residents reviewed for abuse during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) On 7/29/22 at 7:50 AM a review of the Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy dated 7/21/21, Section V B6. reads, providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation. Review of facility reported incident MD00178644 on 7/29/22 at 8:00 AM revealed on 6/9/22 Resident #58 alleged that there was money missing from his/her nightstand drawer. Review of the facility investigation that was provided by the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) included (2) employee interviews and the resident interview. It was also noted on the front page of the report that law enforcement was notified. The facility documented that police were unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to orient, prepare, and document a resident's preparation for a transfer to the hospital. This was identified for 2 (#57, #61) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization during an annual certification survey. The findings include. 1) Review of Resident #57's electronic and paper medical record on 08/03/22 at 11:31 AM revealed a change in condition note dated 8/24/21 for 6:09 PM that was written as Change in Condition Note Text: Brief Synopsis of Change: Hematuria and lethargy Summary of Change in Condition: Pt was lethargic and had Hematuria. Transferred out to [hospital name] Hospital. There was no documentation as to what interventions were put into place before the transfer, what the resident was told and if the resident understood where he/she was going and why. An interview was conducted with the unit manager (staff #48) at 2:23 PM on 8/3/22. She read the change in condition note dated 8/24/21 6:09 PM (as above) and acknowledged that the note was brief. At 3:03 PM on 8/3/22 an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to conduct an accurate, comprehensive assessment by failing to assess a resident's mood and cognitive status on comprehensive and quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessments. This was evident for 3 (#27, #46, #28) of 38 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on these individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) On 7/21/22 at 10:04 AM a review of Resident #31's medical record revealed a comprehensive MDS assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/3/22 was not complete. Section C, Cognitive Patterns and Section D, Mood was not assessed. 2) On 7/27/22 at 8:04 AM a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow a physician's ordered treatment. This was evident for 1 (Resident#61) of 1 resident reviewed for non-pressure skin condition. The findings include. Review of resident #61's medical record on 7/26/22 revealed that the resident had multiple chronic vascular bilateral lower extremity wounds. Review of the physician order's revealed that there was multiple treatment wound orders prescribed for daily dressing changes with various treatments to each wound. On 8/4/22 at 9:14 AM, an agency Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) staff #86, was observed to provide wound care and replace the wound dressing to the multiple areas on resident #61's feet and legs. Upon completion of the observed wound treatments, resident #61's medical record was reviewed to reconcile the physician orders to the observed wound care. Based on the medical record review it was discovered that the nurse staff #86 failed to provide the prescribed treatment ordered as Wound location: right medial plantar great toe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, it was determined the facility 1) failed to properly date label oxygen tubing when changed, 2) failed to follow physician's orders for the administration of oxygen, and 3) failed to develop and implement a person centered comprehensive care plan with resident centered goals for respiratory care to include oxygen therapy. This was evident for 2 (#307 and #76) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care during the annual survey. The findings include: On 7/22/22 at 8:10 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #307 lying in bed. An oxygen concentrator (a machine that concentrates oxygen from the air) was on the right side of the resident's bed. The resident was wearing a nasal cannula (oxygen tube with nose prongs) that was connected to the concentrator. The tubing was not date labeled to indicate when it was last changed. When asked, the resident was unable to recall when it was last changed. During a review of Resident #307's medical record conducted on 8/1/22 at 8:12 AM, surveyor noted an active physician order dated 7/22/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility pharmacist failed to identify and report irregularities in the resident's drug regimen to the physician, facility's medical director and the director of nursing. This was evident for 1 (#80) of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: On 7/29/22 at 7:43 AM a review was conducted of Resident #80's medical record. Review of the July 2022 physician's orders revealed the order Metoprolol 25 mg. 1/2 tablet every 12 hours at 8 AM and 8 PM. The order stated to hold the medication if SBP (systolic blood pressure) was less than 110 or HR (heart rate) less than 60. Metoprolol is a beta-blocker used to treat hypertension. The top number of the blood pressure refers to the amount of pressure in the arteries during the contraction of the heart muscle. This is called systolic pressure. The bottom number refers to the blood pressure when the heart muscle is between beats. This is called diastolic pressure. Review of Resident #80's July 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors as evidenced by failing to follow a physician's order related to holding blood pressure medications if outside of physician ordered parameters. This was evident for 1 (#251) of 5 residents reviewed for medication pass observation and 1 (#151) of 2 residents reviewed for death during the annual survey. The findings include: Blood pressure is a measurement of the pressure that the blood places on the arteries as it is moving through the arteries. The top number is the systolic pressure, which is a measurement of the pressure when the heart pumps the blood out into the arteries. The bottom number is the diastolic pressure which is a measurement of the pressure when the heart is between beats (resting). 1) On 7/26/22 at 7:58 AM observation was made of medication administration for Resident #151. After the medication administration observation, the resident's medical record was reviewed. Review of Resident #151's July 2022…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that facility staff failed to provide timely dental care. This was evident for 1 (#28) of 3 residents reviewed for dental during the annual survey. The findings include: On 7/28/22 at 7:54 AM a review of Resident #28's medical record revealed a progress note dated 4/7/22 at 11:22 AM that documented that a fax request was made for dental services for Resident #28. A 5/9/22 at 11:51 AM progress note stated that Resident #28 was complaining that when s/he eats the upper teeth that broke were sharp and hurting his/her gum. The Nurse Practitioner (NP) was notified and an order was given to have dental consult. A 6/30/22 at 1:49 PM progress note documented that Resident #28 told staff that his/her teeth hurt when he/she tried to eat. A 6/30/2022 at 15:37 (3:37 PM) dietician note documented, per nursing, resident reports difficulty chewing PBJ snack related to dental issues. On 7/14/22 at 6:02 PM a dietician note documented that Resident #28 occasionally had chewing issues reported from nursing due to dental issues. On 8/4/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide rehabilitation services following the recommendation from an orthopedic physician consult. This was evident for 1 (#55) of 2 residents reviewed for rehabilitation. The findings include: On 7/21/22 at 9:54 AM observation was made of Resident #55 lying in bed. Resident #55's left arm appeared contracted. On 8/1/22 at 1:37 PM Resident #55's medical record was reviewed. Resident #55 was admitted to the facility in May 2017 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to a cerebral infarction affecting the left dominant side and nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. On 8/8/22 at 10:23 AM an interview was conducted with Staff #53, physical therapist (PT). Staff #53 stated that Resident #55 was currently not on a program due to him/her being at baseline. Continued review of Resident #55's medical record revealed a progress note dated 3/22/22 at 15:00 (3:00) PM which documented that the resident returned from an ortho (orthopedic) appointment with the recommendation to continue PT/OT…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to document that resident and/or their Responsible Parties (RPs) were provided education on Pneumococcal vaccines before requesting consent. This was evident for 1 (Resident #401) of 5 residents reviewed for Immunizations during the survey. The findings include: Pneumococcal vaccine helps to prevent pneumococcal disease, which is any type of illness caused by streptococcus pneumonia bacteria. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends a pneumococcal vaccine for age [AGE] years or older and adults 19 through [AGE] years old with certain medical conditions or risk factors. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention- vaccines and preventable disease) Flu is a contagious disease that spreads around the United States every year, usually between October and May. Anyone can get the flu, but it is more dangerous for some people. Infants and young children, people 65 years and older, pregnant people, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — isolated
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to properly prevent the transmission of COVID-19 by failing to conduct staff testing twice a week during the time the facility was in a COVID-19 outbreak. This was evident for 1 (Staff #41) of 5 randomly selected staff reviewed for COVID-19 testing during the survey. The finding includes: During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/4/22 at 7:30 AM, she was asked about COVID-19 Staff testing. The DON stated since the facility was under outbreak that started on 7/20/22, all staff needed to be tested twice a week regardless of their vaccination status. The DON submitted the COVID-19 testing log from the week of 6/12/22 to the week of 7/24/22 on 8/4/22 at 9:00 AM. Review of the COVID-19 testing log revealed that Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA #41) did not do the COVID-19 test on 7/24/22. During an interview with the DON on 8/4/22 at 9:39 AM, she stated, for some reason, the twice-weekly COVID testing log was not updated timely. Staff did the test, filled out COVID-19 test results…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to document providing education regarding the benefits, risks, and potential side effects of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine to residents and staff. This was evident for 1 (Resident #401) of 5 residents and 2 (staff #10 and #20) of 4 facility staff members reviewed for COVID-19 vaccinations during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 8/1/22 at 09:00 AM, Resident #401's immunization medical record was reviewed. There was documentation found as [name-Responsible Party(RP)] refused vaccine in the electronic medical record (EMR) immunization under the COVID-19 vaccine tab. However, no documentation was found for evidence of education provided under the resident's paper chart or electronic medical record. During an interview with the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) and the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/1/22 at 3:10 PM, they stated the facility staff provided vaccination education to the resident or RP and documented it under EMR. The DON also said, sometimes education should be charted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents had access to alert staff for assistance through the facility's call bell system. This was evident in 1 (resident #61) of 32 resident call bells activated during this survey. The findings include: On 7/21/22 at 10:13 AM resident #61 was observed sitting on the edge of his/her bed asking for assistance. She was informed to utilize her call bell. She was observed to press her call button and there was not a light or sound. Resident #61's call light was not operational. The resident's roommate was not in the room at the time. The surveyor pressed the call button that was for the resident's roommate and a sound was heard and the light above the door lit up. From the hallway, the unit manager (staff #48) was observed going into resident #64's room and was heard informing the resident that she will get someone and turned off the call light. The Unit manager was interview at 10:17 AM on 7/21/22. She was asked about when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and family and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to accommodate Resident #21 by leaving the television on a channel where Russian was the primary language spoken. This was evident for 1 resident investigated for language concerns during the survey. The findings include: On 12/19/18 at 11:09 AM, a family member voiced a concern that staff kept changing the TV (television) stations to English-speaking channels instead of leaving it on a Russian-speaking channel. According to the family, Resident #21 understands some English but speaks Russian. On 12/19/18 beginning at 12:53 PM, the medical record was reviewed. According to his/her care plan, Resident #21 is dependent on staff for socialization related to behaviors and language barrier. One planned intervention states: Offer music, pictures, games with the assistance of language line. On 12/20/18 at about 9:30 AM, the resident was observed with the Director of Nursing (DON) present. The TV was on an English-speaking channel. On 12/20/18 at 11:04 AM during an interview, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-12-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical records review, and family and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that Resident #21 was shaved daily. This was evident for 1 resident reviewed for activities of daily living during the survey. The findings include: On 12/18/18 at 2:30 PM, Resident #21 was observed to be unshaven. On 12/19/18 at 10:09 AM, the resident was observed to still not have been shaved. On 12/19/18 at 11:11 AM during an interview with a family member, he/she stated family usually shaves the resident, but the spouse just had surgery and the family hasn't been able to come in to do it. Per the family member, the resident is unable to shave independently. Beginning on 12/18/18 at about 3:00 PM, the medical record was reviewed. Although there was a care plan that addressed activities of daily living such as personal hygiene which includes shaving, bathing, toileting, etc., no reason was documented as to why the resident was not being shaved daily. It is a minimum standard of nursing practice that male residents are to be shaved daily.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that food was stored and prepared in sanitary manner. This practice has a potential of effecting all residents in facility. The findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 12/18/18 at 9:15 AM, accompanied by the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) staff member #10 who verified all surveyor observed finding. On 12/18/18 10:29 A.M. observed on clean kitchen pan storage shelve: 1). 1- 4-inch 1/2 pan, 2-1/3 pan, 1-1/2 pan with 1-full pan was observed with water resting at bottom of pan is called wet nesting. 2). 1-full pan, 1-2 inch, 4-inch, and 6-inchdirty with visible white reside dried food in the bottom of each pan. Infection Control issues: On same day staff member #1 was observed with no facial beard hair cover on while preparing chicken, with other food for lunch menu. On 12/18/18 at 10:15 A.M. staff member #1 replied during staff interview he/she it was my fault for not wearing the facial face net cover and was just busy working and forgot. On 12/18/18 at 11:15 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that equipment used for personal hygiene was stored appropriately in a room shared by Residents #44 and #55. This was evident for 2 of 32 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 12/19/18 at 1:53 PM, wash basins for roommates Residents #44 and #55 were found stored one inside the other. This was confirmed by staff nurse #4.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-08-11 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on request for historical staffing sheets the facility failed to maintain the posted daily staffing sheets for resident and public access. 3 of 3 dates for staffing sheets requested were not provided. The findings include. Upon discussion with the Director of Nursing on 8/10/22 at 8:41 AM, Federal and state staffing sheets for all three shifts for the following dates 7/23/21, 8/29/21, and 5/17/22 were requested. On 8/11/22 at 1:15 PM, The Director of Nursing revealed that she could not find the requested staffing sheets.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Crystal SpringsElkins, WV 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glen BurnieGlen Burnie, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At HomewoodBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Long GreenBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at GreenfieldMilwaukee, WI 1 of 5Nella's At Autumn Lake HealthcareElkins, WV 2 of 5Ashbrook Care & Rehabilitation CenterScotch Plains, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Arlington WestBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Ballenger CreekFrederick, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Baltimore WashingtonGlen Burnie, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At BridgeparkBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At CatonsvilleCatonsville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glade ValleyWalkersville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Loch RavenBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At MadisonMadison, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Memorial BridgePenns Grove, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At NorwalkNorwalk, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At OverleaBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RuxtonTowson, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Salem CountySalem, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At SouthgateCarneys Point, NJ 2 of 5King David Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBaltimore, MD 2 of 5The Subacute At Autumn Lake HealthcareVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Alice ManorBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Calvert ManorRising Sun, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chesapeake WoodsCambridge, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chevy ChaseChevy Chase, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Patuxent RiverLaurel, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Perring ParkwayBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RiverviewEssex, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Silver SpringSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Spa CreekAnnapolis, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Summit ParkCatonsville, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VinelandVineland, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VoorheesVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At West HartfordWest Hartford, CT 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare Post-Acute Care CenterBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at BeloitBeloit, WI 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at OceanviewOcean View, NJ 3 of 5Cornell Hall Care & Rehabilitation CenterUnion, NJ

Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
4260 GROUP LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF17%since 08/01/2018
KING DAVID EQUITIES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF12%since 08/01/2018
THE MARKSTEIN GROUP LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF6%since 08/01/2018
PIKESVILLE REALTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2018
SCHWARTZ, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
EISENREICH, AHRONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2019
SALAZAR, ANDRESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2018
MARKSTEIN, AARONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/23/2025
MARKSTEIN, ISAACIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
STERN, BEZALELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
TENDLER, YITZCHOKIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/08/2025
ACCURATE STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2018
BRAND SONNENSCHINE LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2018
MEISELS, MORRISIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2018
STERN, ARYEHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.2M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 14%Other / private 11%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$397per resident / day
operating cost
$12,059per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$385per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215082. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next