No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chesapeake Woods

525 Glenburn Avenue, Cambridge, MD 21613 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 98 certified beds · (410) 221-1400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 221-1400 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2024Resident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$50,879 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $50,879 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-09)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
503 Muir St Ste A · (410) 228-4045 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
909 Washington St · (410) 228-0900 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
605 Pine St · (443) 225-6476 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Linden Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
501 Glenburn Ave · (410) 228-4943

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased29.6%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.5%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.3%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%2.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.1%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.2%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%5.9%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.3%25.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.4%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.9%80.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.8%21.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.6%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.211.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.501.201.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 181 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
14.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
75.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 75.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.0%CMS range 44.7–62.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF14.3%CMS range 11.5–17.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge75.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.9–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.71
RN hours/ resident / day
0.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.98
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.48
RN hoursweekends
39.0%
Total nursing turnover
43.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 94.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.13 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-19)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-05)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to supervise a cognately impaired resident who was at high risk for elopement as evidenced by the resident leaving the facility unattended without the staff's knowledge. This deficient practice was evidenced in 1(#40) of 1 resident investigations reviewed for elopement during the recertification survey.The BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) assessment is a quick standardized cognitive screening tool used in long-term care facilities to gauge a resident's orientation, attention and memory recall through simple questions about the date and repeating three words. Scored from 0-15, it helps staff track changes in cognitive function, identify potential delirium or dementia, and determine if further specialized assessment is needed. Scores are categorized: 13-15 (intact), 8-12 (moderate impairment), 0-7 (severe impairment).The findings include:On 12/15/25 at 10:09 AM a review of the facility's investigation related to the elopement of Resident #40 revealed on the afternoon of 12/21/24 a visitor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations, record review, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain food service equipment in a manner that ensures sanitary food service operations to prevent possible foodborne illness. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen.The findings include:Cross-contamination refers to the transference of harmful substances or pathogenic microorganisms to food by hands, food contact surfaces, sponges, cloth towels, or utensils that have not been properly cleaned after contacting raw food and then touching ready-to-eat foods. Cross-contamination may also arise from inadequate dishwashing procedures that fail to effectively wash, rinse, sanitize, and air-dry all food equipment.On 12/10/2025 at 7:45 AM, The surveyor conducted a kitchen tour with the Healthcare Services Group (HCSG) Regional Manager after calibrating stem thermometers in a cup of ice water, and the following non-compliance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-19 · tag F0923 — widespread
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clean and effective ventilation systems, thereby impeding proper airflow throughout the premises. This was evident in 13 out of 16 ventilation systems reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:Local Exhaust Ventilation ([NAME]) systems are designed/engineered to capture and remove contaminants such as excessive heat, steam, condensation, vapor, smoke, and fumes. This is achieved by calibrating the total pressure, which is determined by the sum of the static pressure exiting and entering the system, minus the velocity pressure entering the system. In addition, the fan speed, pressure, and power must be adjusted to account for the specific gravity of the contaminant being captured and removed by the [NAME] system, considering the specific size and air changes of the room.Type 1 hood systems are designed and installed primarily over…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure residents had access to their calls bells if assistance was needed. This deficient practice was evidenced in 7 (#10, #28, #44, #59, #72, #83, & #85) out of 36 residents who resided on Choptank during the recertification survey.The findings include:On 12/10/25 at 7:44 am during observation rounds the surveyor observed multiple residents on the unit Choptank who did not have access to their call bells. At 7:46 am the surveyor observed Resident # 44 call bell on top of the fall mat next to the bed. At 7:53 am the surveyor observed Resident #85 & Resident #28 call bells on the floor. At 7:55 am the surveyor observed Resident #10 call bell hanging off the side of the bed. At 8:04 am the surveyor was unable to locate Resident #72 call bell. Geriatric Nursing Assistant #15 found the resident's call bell inside the top drawer of the bedside table. At 8:11 am the surveyor observed Resident #59 call bell on the floor near the head of the bed close to the wheel and Resident #83 call bell was clipped…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a clean homelike environment as evidenced by soiled and unlined waste baskets and stained wash sinks in residents' rooms. This deficient practice was observed on the Unit Choptank during the recertification survey.The findings include:On 12/10/25 at 7:50 am while in room [ROOM NUMBER] the surveyor observed stains in the sinks of the resident's bathroom. At 7:56 am while in room [ROOM NUMBER] the surveyor observed a soiled unlined waster basket next to a resident's wheelchair. At 7:58 am while in room [ROOM NUMBER] the surveyor observed pink stains in the sink, a soiled unlined waste basket, and stains on the bathroom floor. At 8:04 am the surveyor observed a soiled unlined waste basket in room [ROOM NUMBER]. At 8:06 am the waste basket in room [ROOM NUMBER] was soiled and unlined. At 8:11 am the waste basket in room [ROOM NUMBER] near bed B was soiled and unlined. On 12/17/25 at 11:32 am the surveyor informed EVS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment sufficient to minimize or eliminate the risk of cross-contamination as evidenced by residents who shared a bathroom personal items were not labeled and failed to implement proper hand hygiene practices to help prevent the spread of pathogenic diseases. This was evident in 13 areas within the facility that were assessed during the recertification survey. The findings include: Infection control practices include indications for the use of gloves, masks, and other personal protective equipment (PPE); methods for hand hygiene; procedures for vascular access and dressing changes; and protocols for cleaning and disinfecting equipment and the environment following spills and splashes of blood or effluent. Infection control measures include implementation of care, handling, cleaning, storage, and disposal of equipment, supplies, biohazardous waste and including proper ventilation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to assure residents whose funds are being managed by the facility have ready and reasonable access to their funds. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 58 of the 93 resident whose accounts are being managed by the facility when the recertification survey was conducted.The findings are:On 12/17/25 at 2:27 pm during an interview with Business Office Manager # 25 the surveyor asked to explain how a resident is allowed access to their funds. Business Office manager #25 verbalized they come up front and tell the receptionist or him/her they want a certain amount of cash. They have a cash box and if the money is in the cash box, the resident can have it. If not they will try to get the money by the next day. When a resident receives money, they have to sign for it. After hours and the weekend, they can get $5 or $10.On 12/17/25 at 3:00 pm the surveyor informed Business Office Manager #25 the residents are supposed to have access to their account at any time and they should be able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to complete through investigations for allegations of abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced in 2 (#38 & #59) of 5 investigations reviewed for a through investigation during the recertification survey.The findings include:1) On 12/18/25 at 1:29 pm a review of the investigation related to an allegation of abuse concerning Resident #59 revealed twenty-one different staff worked on the unit from 03/01/25 - 03/02/25 when the alleged incident may have occurred. There were no statements from all the staff who worked when the alleged incident may have occurred. On 12/18/25 at 2:25 pm during an interview with the Administrator the surveyor asked how they determine who needs to be interviewed when they need to complete an investigation. The staff were told to write their name and title on statements. The Administration verbalized they usually get the staffing sheets to see who worked and interview the staff. 2) On 12/18/25 at 3:08 pm a review of the investigation concerning an allegation of abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of the bed hold policy when the resident was transferred/discharged from the facility to an acute care facility. This was evident for 1 (resident # 2) of 3 residents reviewed that were transferred to an acute care facility. The findings include: Review of the medical records for Resident #2 on 12/15/2025 at 3:52 PM revealed on 8/24/2025 the resident was sent to an acute care facility for a change in his/her medical condition. Further review of the medical record failed to produce written evidence that the resident and /or the resident representative were given written notice of the bed hold policy. During an interview with the Administrator about Resident #2, on 12/16/2025 at 10:43 AM, she stated that she mailed the bed hold policy to the resident's representative. However, the Administrator was unable to produce written evidence that the resident/ resident representative was given/received written notice of the bed hold policy. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to initiate a person-centered care plan for a resident who was high risk for wandering, required assistance with oral hygiene, and a resident who frequently refused ADL care. This deficient practice was evidenced in 2 (#11 & #40) of 11 resident records reviewed for person centered care plans during the recertification survey.The findings include:1) On 12/10/25 at 12:47 pm during observation rounds the surveyor noticed Resident #40 had several missing teeth and the remaining teeth were discolored and decayed. On 12/12/25 at 9:31 am during an interview with the RN Unit Manager of Choptank #15 the surveyor asked how the facility ensures the residents receive dental care. He/she verbalized they don't ask if the residents had recent vision, dental, or audiology care when they are admitted . Routine dental assessments are done quarterly; he/she gets them enrolled into Health Drive. They usually don't care plan for all services for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to adhere to professional nursing standards as evidenced by the nursing staff failure to document why a resident did not receive their enteral nutrition. This deficient practice was evidenced in 1 (#10) of 1 resident record reviewed for enteral nutrition during the recertification survey.The Maryland Nurse Practice Act guide and governs nursing practice in the state of Maryland. Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, and certificate holders are expected to practice within the established regulations defined by the Nurse Practice Act. According to 10.27.10.02 B (3) (c) (i) The LPN contributes to the nursing assessment by recording data in a manner which is complete, timely, and accurate.The findings include:On 12/17/25 at 9:59 am a review of Resident #10 enteral nutrition order was dated 11/30/25 at 12:47 pm read Enteral Feed Order two times a day for dysphagia Jevity 1.5 at 55 ml hour x 20 hours (Total Volume 1100ml). Up at 5:00 pm, down at 1:00 pm: total volume for 24hrs 1100 ml.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant, (GNA) personnel files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to conduct yearly performance reviews at least every 12 months on 1 out of 2 GNA files reviewed during the recertification survey.The findings include: On 12/18/2025 at 10:13 AM Staff #8, GNA record review revealed that their 12-month performance review was last completed 5/17/2024. On 12/18/2025 at 10:30 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and asked if they had any more documentation related to Staff #8, GNA's 12-month performance evaluation. The DON stated they do not have Staff #8's performance evaluation for 2025. The DON verbalized understanding that GNA's performance evaluation should be done annually.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on review of medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to respond to recommendations made by consulting pharmacists in a timely manner. This was evident for 1of 5 residents (Residents #4) reviewed during the investigation phase of the survey for unnecessary medications. The findings include: On 12/15/2025 at 11:40 AM Resident #4's Medical Management Review (MMR) and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) were reviewed. The MMR had 2 recommendations for Resident #4. The first recommendation was addressed by Staff # 32, Physician Assistant (PA) as evidence by the written order, signature and date on the MMR. However, the second recommendation by the consulting pharmacist was not addressed. The consulting pharmacist stated that Resident #4 has an order for Midodrine 5mg three times a day for hypotension, low blood pressure (BP). Midodrine should be administered no later than 6pm (3-4 hours before bedtime) to avoid supine hypertension, high BP. Currently evening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident meals were palatable, sufficiently portioned, and the foods were maintained outside of the food danger zone. This was evident for 2 (Resident #82 and Resident #5) of 2 residents interviewed and 2 of 2 foodservice operation days observed during the annual survey. The findings include: The Food Danger Zone means temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and below 135 degrees F that allow the rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness. On 12/11/2025 at 1:15 PM, a telephone interview with Resident #82's Power of Attorney (POA) revealed that the resident was not receiving adequate food portions. On 12/11/2025 at 1:37 PM, Resident #5 voiced complaints regarding the taste and texture of the food. The resident further explained that the roast beef served for dinner on 12/10/2025 was tough, resembling rubber, and could not be cut with a butter knife. On 12/16/2025 at 9:15 AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0837 — isolated
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on the QAPI process and interview it was determined that the facility staff were unable to report what individuals are legally responsible to establish and implement policies regarding the management and operations of the facility. The findings include: On 12/19/25 at 9:14 am during an interview with the Administrator the surveyor asked questions about the governing body, the Administrator verbalized not knowing what the surveyor was speaking of. The Administrator verbalized they have corporate leadership that comes to the facility, but she was uncertain who was legally responsible for the building and the leadership.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in proper operating condition. This was evident for 4 of 4 pieces of equipment reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:All essential kitchen equipment, including but not limited to walk-in coolers, steam tables, dishwashers, ovens, stoves, and warming cabinets, must be maintained in safe operating conditions in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and remain accessible throughout kitchen operations.On 12/10/2025 at 7:40 AM, the surveyor observed an inoperable steam table located in front of the cookline. The Healthcare Service Group (HCSG) District Manager confirmed the steam table was nonfunctional.At 7:55 AM, the surveyor observed that the Type 2 ventilation system above the high-temperature mechanical dishwasher was insufficiently removing steam from the unit. The steam escaped from the sides of the dishwasher and dissipated throughout the kitchen area.At 8:20 AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations, record review, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a call bell system was accessible to residents. This was evident for 1 (Resident #8) of 1 resident's and 1of 1 restroom call bell systems reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:On 12/11/2025 at 10:34 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #8, who was seated in a wheelchair at the foot of the bed. Following the interview, the surveyor asked Resident #8 to press the call bell for assistance due to reported pain and discomfort. The resident was unable to access the call bell, which was positioned behind the wheelchair. The resident confirmed this was the designated location for the call bell each morning when seated in the wheelchair.At 11:19 AM, the surveyor once again reported to the nurses' station that Resident #8 was experiencing discomfort and requested repositioning from the wheelchair. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with a homelike environment. This was found to be evident for 15 residents (#11, #20, #24, #35, #39, #52, #58, #60, #61, #62, #65, #68, #70, #79, #238) out of 94 resident environments observed by the surveyors during the survey. The findings include: During the initial screening on 02/12/24 at 10:04 AM, the surveyor observed that walls above the sink were damaged in rooms 73, 75, 80, 83, 84, 85, 87, and 89 on the Choptank Unit. The Corporate Maintenance Director was informed of the wall damage in the bathroom walls on the Choptank Unit on 02/15/24 at 09:38 AM. He stated he would investigate it and get back to the surveyor with his observations. On 02/15/24 at 11:03 AM, the Corporate Maintenance Director told the surveyor that he observed that the walls above the sinks were damaged from water splashing and the walls would be repaired and covered with fiberglass to protect the walls from future damage. During an interview with the Administrator and Director of Nursing on 2/23/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately document wound assessments in a resident 's medical record. This was found evident for 1 (Resident #17) of 2 Residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. On 2/20/24 at 10:28 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #17's medical record. The review revealed a wound note from Wound Nurse Practitioner Staff #31. The note revealed that on 3/30/23, Staff #31 evaluated Resident #17 and documented the resident had a stage 3 pressure ulcer (classification of wound; stage 3 is a full -thickness wound, where the wound is through the top two layers of the skin and into the fatty tissue below). Further review revealed an assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to hold care plan meetings with an interdisciplinary team for residents at the time of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This was found evident for 1 (Resident #17) of 5 residents reviewed for care planning. The finding include: Care plans are developed for residents to guide the care that residents receive in the facility. They are required to be developed within 7 days of completion of a resident's admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and revised at least every quarter (or more often as needed). The facility is required to have care plans developed and revised by an interdisciplinary team. On 2/12/24 at 10:56 AM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #17. In this interview Resident #17 stated he/she had not been to a care plan recently. On 2/16/24 at 9:27 AM, the surveyor interviewed Social Worker, Staff #8. During the interview Staff #8 described how care plan meetings are set up. She stated when a care plan is scheduled a letter is sent to either the Resident or the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident's medical records, and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care in accordance with the resident's plan of care. This was found to be evident for 2 of 4 (Resident #188 and #17) residents reviewed for ADLs during an annual and complaint survey. The findings include: Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) is a term used collectively to describe fundamental skills required to independently care for oneself, such as eating, bathing, and mobility. 1a) On 2/28/24 at 9:25 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #188's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #188 was admitted to the facility in June of 2022. Further review revealed that Resident #188 had a baseline care plan initiated shortly after being admitted . The care plan indicated that Resident #188 preferred to receive showers. On 3/5/24 at approximately 10:30 AM, the surveyor asked for shower documentation for Resident #188 for the month of September of 2022. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with the professional standards for oxygen administration. This was found evident of 1 out of 3 (Resident #17) residents reviewed for respiratory care during an annual and complaint survey. The findings include: Pulse oximeter - a device that uses a light source to analyze the light that passes through a finger and can determine the percentage of oxygen saturation in the red blood cells, referred to as a pulse ox. Nasal cannula- a medical device used to provide supplemental oxygen therapy to people who have lower oxygen levels. On February /2024 at 9:55 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #17's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #17 had a care plan initiated on 11/6/23 related to the resident's emphysema (a lung condition that causes shortness of breath) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). One of the interventions listed was,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews and facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place that ensured a resident's medication irregularity report was reviewed by the primary care physician and that the recommendations were addressed timely. This was found evident of 1 (#17) of 5 residents reviewed for medication regimen review. Then findings include: Medication Regimen Review (MRR) or Drug Regimen Review is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication. The MRR includes review of the medical record in order to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities. The MRR also involves collaborating with other members of the Inter-Disciplinary Team (IDT), including the resident, their family, and/or resident representative. On 2/26/24 at 12:25 PM the surveyor reviewed the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for Resident #17. During the review it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. This was evident for 1 (Resident #17) or 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: On 2/26/24 at 12:25 PM the surveyor reviewed Resident #17's medical record. The review revealed a Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for Resident #17 completed on 12/11/23. The report stated Resident #17 was ordered two vitamin D3 oral medications. One dose every 7 days and the other one to be given every day. The Pharmacist recommended the provider evaluate if both agents were needed and consider discontinuing one of them. On 2/27/24 at 9:45 AM, the surveyor reviewed the Vitamin D3 orders. Both orders were written on 12/8/23. The order for the Vitamin D3 to be given every 7 days was discontinued on 2/27/24 at 8:34 AM, one day after the recommendations were requested by the surveyor. On 2/27/24 at 9:51 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the DON. In this interview the DON stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to limit a as needed psychotropic medication from being prescribed for less than 14 days. This was found evident in 1 (Resident #17) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The finding include: On 2/26/24 at 12:25 PM the surveyor reviewed Resident #17's medical record. The review revealed a Medication Regimen Review (MRR) irregularity report was completed for Resident #17 on 11/20/23 and 12/4/23, both for the same medication alprazolam (prescribed to treat anxiety). On 11/20/23 the Pharmacist recommended a 14-day stop date with the as needed alprazolam order. On 12/4/23 the Pharmacist recommended discontinuing alprazolam order and stated; if the medication cannot be discontinued then the provider should document the indication for use, intended duration and rationale for the extended time period. On 2/27/24 at 9:45 AM, the surveyor reviewed the alprazolam order written for Resident #17. The order was written on 11/1/23 and was written to be given as needed. The order was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store medications appropriately according to standards of practice. This was evident for 1 of 30 medications observed during medication administration and 1 of 1 random floor observations. The findings include: Gout- a type of inflammatory arthritis that causes pain and swelling in the joints. On 03/01/2024 at 10:02 AM the surveyor observed a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff #34, prepare and administer medications for Resident # 26. The Infection Preventionist/ Staff Educator, Staff #2, was present and stood opposite the surveyor and Staff # 34 for the duration of the observation. During preparation, the surveyor observed Staff #34 retrieve a blister pack with Allopurinol tablets, a medication prescribed to treat gout. Staff #34 reviewed the expiration date printed on the package and it was listed as 2/29/2024. Staff #34 pulled then retrieved another blister pack of Allopurinol from the medication cart prescribed for Resident #26 and the expiration date was 12/23/2023. Staff #34 retrieved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, facility policy review, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with acceptable professional standards and practices by 1) safeguarding Resident identifiable information from the public and 2) Keeping accurate documentation. This was found evident in 3 (Resident #17, #21 and #188) of 53 Residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1. On 2/12/24 at 12:16 PM, the surveyor observed a medication cart with a computer on top of the cart. The computer screen was facing the B hallway on the Chesapeake wing. On further observations, the computer screen had Resident #17's medication profile displayed and the surveyor could see a list of medications. On 2/12/24 at 12:18 PM, the surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff #29. During the interview Staff #29 locks the computer screen and confirms that the computer screen should not be displaying the Resident ' s health care information. She also identifies the cart belong to the nurse that is working in the B hallway LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that staff performed hand hygiene. This was evident for 2 (# 28 and # 29) out of 7 staff observed for hand hygiene. The findings include: On 02/20/24 at 08:18 AM, the surveyor observed Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #23 go into room [ROOM NUMBER] to serve breakfast, touch the resident environment, then proceed to the juice cart and return to room to finish helping the resident. She then went into room [ROOM NUMBER] and assisted the resident, touching the resident environment and exited the room towards the breakfast cart. When asked what the facility hand hygiene policy was GNA #23 stated we perform hand hygiene after touching a patient. She further stated I haven't touched a pt, but I can find hand sanitizer on the medication cart. The surveyor observed GNA #24 on 02/20/24 at 08:20 AM, enter room [ROOM NUMBER]. GNA #24 helped the resident set up breakfast, touching the resident environment and exited. GNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident's responsible party (RP) was informed of a change in the medical regimen. This was evident for 1 (#89) out of 53 residents that were part of the survey sample. The findings include: An investigation into intake #MD00178510 revealed Resident #89's primary physician prescribed Seroquel (an antipsychotic) on 4/8/21, Haldol (an antipsychotic) on 3/4/22 and Depakote (an anticonvulsant used to treat epilepsy and bipolar disorder) on 3/4/22. The resident's RP was not informed of the medications being ordered for the resident and the medications were administered before the RP was aware of the orders per the complaint. A review of Resident #89's clinical record revealed the RP was not informed of the medications being ordered. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 3/4/24 at 1:25 PM. She was informed of the three medications that were ordered and started without informing the RP. She said she would check the Electronic Health Record because she thought it may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident's responsible party (RP) was informed of a fall. This was evident for 1 (#88) out of 53 residents in the survey sample. The findings include: An investigation into intake #MD00178237 revealed Resident #88 had a fall in April of 2022. The resident informed their cardiologist on 4/9/22 that they fell a couple of nights ago. The cardiologist assessed the resident for signs of an injury but did not observe any injury. The resident complained of left side pain along the ribcage. Cardiologist collaborated with primary physician regarding care and an x-ray was ordered for a chest x-ray. The x-ray was obtained the next day. Further review of the clinical record revealed that the resident's RP was not notified of the fall.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to protect a Resident from abuse from a staff member. This was found evident of 1 of 17 (Resident #37) Residents reviewed for abuse allegations during an annual and complaint survey. The findings include: On 2/12/24 at 12:01 PM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #37. During this interview Resident #37 described an event in which Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) Staff #26, responded to his/her call for assistance. After Resident #37 requested assistance with an incontinent incident, Staff #26 laughed at him/her and walked out of the room without responding to the request for assistance. Resident #37 reported this incident to the facility. On 2/22/24 at 10:19 AM, the surveyor reviewed the report of the investigation the facility conducted on the incident Resident #37 alleged about Staff #26. The report contained a copy of the Facility Reported Incident investigation that was submitted to the Office of Health Care Quality on 1/3/24. The report stated the facility suspended Staff #26 pending the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the State Office of Health Care Quality. This was found evident in 1 out of 17 (Resident #189) Residents reviewed for abuse allegations during an annual and complaint survey. The findings include: On 3/04/24 at 1:05 PM, the surveyor reviewed an investigation report the facility conducted regarding an allegation of abuse of Resident #3. The surveyor reviewed 8 questionnaires titled, 'Resident Interviews'. All 8 questionnaires were conducted on 10/2/23. Each questionnaire had the name of the resident being interviewed but did not indicate who conducted the interview. The last question on the form stated; Has anyone hurt or harmed you? One resident (Resident #189's) response to the question was, Only verbal abuse by Aids. On 3/4/24 at 1:26 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON). During the interview the DON stated she along with the Administer In Training (AIT) conducted the investigation regarding Resident #3. She further stated she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted and maintain documentation of the investigation. This was evident for 2 (Resident # 88 and #90) out of the 53 residents that were part of the survey sample. The findings include: 1a) An investigation into intake #MD00178237 revealed Resident #88 had a fall in April of 2022. The resident informed their cardiologist on 4/9/22 that they fell a couple of nights ago. The cardiologist assessed the resident for signs of an injury but did not observe any injury. The resident complained of left side pain along the ribcage. Cardiologist collaborated with primary physician regarding care and an x-ray was ordered for a chest x-ray. The x-ray was obtained the next day. A review of the facility's investigation of the fall revealed that the nurse conducting the investigation completed a checklist of tasks that needed to be completed for a thorough investigation. One of the items…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed: 1) to ensure that a physician sent a death certificate to a funeral home and 2) failed to ensure the physician provided supervision for a resident with significant weight loss. This was evident for 1 (#337) out 3 residents reviewed for death and 1 (Resident # 96) out of 1 resident reviewed for weight loss. The findings include: The investigation into intake #MD00198914 revealed Resident #337 died on [DATE]. The funeral home handling the funeral did not receive the resident's death certificate. A review of the resident's clinical record revealed that there was no evidence that the facility sent the death certificate to the funeral home that picked up the body or to the funeral home that received the body. Staff #21 was interviewed on [DATE] at 9:09 AM. She said the second funeral home called her to ask for the death certificate. She didn't realize they didn't have it, so she called the Director of Nursing and got…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to 1) maintain proper infection control and sanitation procedures and 2) promote a resident's dignity and respect while providing feeding assistance to a resident during lunch. This was found to be evident during observations on both units and individual observations for 1 (Resident #70) when a dining experience was observed during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: 1) Observation of meal service on 3/26/19 at 8:30 AM on the Homestead unit Staff # 14 was observed serving meals from the hot cart. H/she did not have a hairnet on or a mask. The Dietary Director was notified at 8:45 Am of the observations of Staff #14 not having a hairnet on while serving breakfast. Observation of lunch on 3/26/19 at 11:30 AM on the Homestead unit Staff #14 was observed serving lunch with a hairnet on and a mask on. She was asked by the surveyor why she had a mask on now and she stated that she had not received her flu shot. Interview on 3/28/19 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-03-29 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent information it was determined that the facility failed to adequately train their Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA's) to serve as dietary personal during meal services. The findings include: Observation on 3/25/19 through 3/28/19 revealed GNA staff that were assigned to residents and responsible for providing care throughout the day however, were also observed assigned to the hot cart and serving breakfast and lunch during the breakfast and lunch meal services on the Homestead Unit. Staff #3, the Dietary Manager, was interviewed multiple times throughout the survey and asked for documentation to be provided to the survey team that the GNA's that are responsible for serving food from the hot cart are trained in the different meal consistencies and portion sizes. On 3/28/19 Staff #3 provided the survey team with a list of staff that were identified as in-serviced on 2/27/19 but there was no attached training. He stated that he could type something up but did not have anything at this moment in writing for the survey team. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations it was determined the facility failed to enhance and promote a resident's dignity and respect while providing feeding assistance to a resident during lunch. This was found to be evident for 1 resident (Resident # 70) when a dining experience was observed during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: A lunch dining experience was observed on 3/25/19 at 12:30 PM. A Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA), Staff #4 entered the C-Wing dining room at 12:30 PM. Upon entering the room from the unit, Staff #4 did not wash or sanitize his/her hands. At 12:32 PM, Staff #4 went over and stood above Resident #70 and fed him/her their lunch. Staff #4 finished feeding the resident at 12:43 PM. The Nurse on the unit, Staff #21 was made aware of all concerns on 3/25/19 at 12:48 PM. The Director of Nursing was made aware of concerns on 3/25/19 at 1:20 PM.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility reported incident MD00128582, investigative information, medical records and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to keep a resident free from abuse. This was evident for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #81) reviewed for abuse. The findings include: On 3/26/19 Resident #81's medical records were reviewed. This review revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status completed on November 2018 with a score of 8 out of 15, the scores between 8 and 12, indicate moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the facility self-reported incident on 3/26/19 revealed that on 7/3/18 when the geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) entered the resident's room the GNA noted that the resident was undressed and had thrown the sheet and adult briefs in the trash and had urinated in the bed. The GNA also revealed she noted that the resident's finger was crooked. The investigating report revealed the GNA left the room and went a got the resident's nurse. When the nurse and the GNA entered the resident's room the resident stated She punched me and broke my…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to include the required statement of the resident's appeal rights and ombudsman contact information in the written notice of transfer. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 2 residents (Residents #90 and #73), reviewed for hospitalization during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: 1. On 3/28/19 review of Resident #90's medical record revealed the resident had been discharged to the hospital on 2/15/19. Further review of the medical record revealed a letter sent to the responsible family member regarding the Notice of Hospital Transfer. Review of this letter failed to reveal any documentation regarding the resident's appeal rights or the contact information for the ombudsman. On 3/28/19 at 3:37 PM surveyor discussed the concern with the Director of Nursing that the letter does not include the required information regarding appeal rights. The concern regarding the failure to include required information in the Notice of Hospital Transfer was again reviewed at time of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with the facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status as evidenced by failure to: 1. assess medication usage and 2. assess the resident's dental condition. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 6 residents (Resident #82 and Resident #1) reviewed during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. 1. On 3/27/19 Resident #82's medical records revealed an MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/4/19 which documented that the resident had not received any psychotropic medication during the 7 day look back period and it was documented that the resident received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview with facility staff, if was determined that the facility failed to follow a resident's care plan related to nutritional intervention needs. This was evident during the review of 1 of 25 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for care planning during the annual survey. The findings include: Resident #13 was observed from 12:25-12:55 PM attempting to eat lunch on 3/25/19. Resident #13 was noted struggling to complete the task of eating; getting his/her hand from the plate to his/her mouth. The resident was observed repeatedly picking up food with his/her fork and staring at it. S/he would repeat the motion of putting food on the fork without completing the motion of getting the fork to his/her mouth. This continued for 30 minutes as staff walked back and forth past the resident. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the Homestead Director Staff #2 were notified of the observations at 1:06 PM on 3/25/19. Review of the resident's medical record on 3/25/19 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that the hand off communication regarding resident consultations and prescriptions were clearly and effectively communicated with staff. This was evident for 1 out of 9 residents (Resident #1) reviewed during the investigative stage of the annual survey. The findings include: On 3/28/19 Resident #1's medical records were reviewed. This review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in October 2018 for rehabilitation and with diagnosis that includes Multiple sclerosis (MS) (an unpredictable, often disabling disease of the central nervous system that disrupts the flow of information within the brain, and between the brain and body). Review of the physician orders failed to have Tecfidera listed as a medication ordered. Medical records review revealed that the resident had a neurology appointment in November 2018 and returned to the facility with a copy of the consultation report. Review of the neurology consultation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee files and interview it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure newly hired Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA's) had skills assessments completed prior to being allowed to work independently with residents. This was found to be evident for 2 out of the 4 employee files (GNA #20 and #17) reviewed for new hire competencies. The findings include: On 3/29/19 at 9:52 AM, Nurse Educator #8 reported that she assesses new hires for competency with hand hygiene. She went on to report that there is a check off list that the person orienting them will check off that the new hires have accomplished and that when this check off is completed it should go to human resources to be included in the employee file. On 3/29/19 review of GNA #20's employee file revealed a hire date in March 2018. No documentation was found that a new hire skills assessment had been completed. On 3/29/19 review of GNA #17's employee file revealed the GNA started working at the facility as a GNA in March of 2018. Review of the Inservice Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee files and interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance reviews for Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA's) for a more than a one year period of time. This was found to be evident for 2 out of the 2 GNA's (GNA #14 and #16) reviewed for annual evaluation and education. The findings include: On 3/29/19 review of GNA #16's employee file revealed a hire date in May of 2010. Further review of the file failed to reveal documentation of an annual performance evaluation since 2017. On 3/29/19 review of GNA #14's employee file revealed a hire date in December of 1994. Further review of the file failed to reveal documentation of an annual performance evaluation. On 3/29/19 at 9:31 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) reported that the previous DON had not done evaluations due to raises not being merit based but that she had started re-implementing annual evaluations starting in January 2019. She went on to state that the evaluations were being conducted based on month of hire and confirmed that GNA #14 would not be scheduled for an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure anti-anxiety medication was destroyed after a resident expired and that narcotics that remained in the facility were included in the shift to shift narcotic count. This was found to be evident during observation of 1 of the 2 medication storage rooms. The findings include: On [DATE] at 11:30 AM observation of the medication room, with Nurse #23, on the Chesapeake unit revealed a container of liquid lorazepam (also known as Ativan, an anti-anxiety medication) in the locked compartment of the medication refrigerator. The medication was labeled as belonging to Resident #139 and Nurse #23 reported that the resident had died. Review of Resident #139's medical record revealed the resident had expired in late [DATE]. Review of the unit's narcotic count book revealed the medication had been received at the facility on [DATE], one dose had been administered to the resident and that 29.75 ml of the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of medical records and facility policies it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a less than 5% error rate during medication administration as evidenced by: 1) Staff crushing medications that were on the facility Do Not Crush list, including extended release and 2) staff failing to take blood pressure prior to administering blood pressure medications. These errors were identified based on observation of 3 out of 3 residents (Residents #5, #27 and #81) observed during medication pass observation with 1 nurse on 1 unit. The findings include: On 3/28/19 between 9:30 AM and 10:30 AM surveyor observed the medication preparation and administration. There were 28 opportunities for error and 3 medication errors. 1) Observation of medication preparation for Resident #27 included 12 medications. Included in the observation were: Guaifenesin ER (extended release) 600 mg give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. All 12 of the medications were observed to be crushed by the nurse (Staff #13) and mixed with applesauce. Prior to administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident was served a therapeutic diet as prescribed by the physician. This was observed of 1 out of 14 residents (Resident #37) during the annual survey. The findings include: Therapeutic Diet means a diet ordered by a physician or delegated registered or licensed dietitian as part of treatment for a disease or clinical condition, or to eliminate or decrease specific nutrients in the diet. Review of the physician's order sheet on 3/25/19 at 2:25 PM revealed a diet change to dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing) puree texture diet (smooth and lump free, which requires no chewing). This order went into effect on 3/25/19. Observation of the lunch time meal on 3/26/19 at 12:16 PM revealed that Resident #37 was not given a puree diet. The resident was served macaroni and cheese and stewed tomatoes with chunks of tomatoes and a slice of bread. The resident was observed coughing several times while ingesting the meal. Interview on 3/26/19 at 12:21 PM with Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #14 who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews with residents and facility staff it was determined the facility failed to have a resident's physician assessment as part of the resident medical record. This was found to be evident for 1 of 25 residents, (Resident # 88) reviewed during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: An interview was conducted with Resident #88 on 3/25/19 at 10:06 AM and s/he stated that the physician came in to visit one time since being admitted to the facility. The resident went on to say the physician visited her/him in the hallway a month ago. Medical record review on 3/27/19 revealed Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A physician progress notes for 2/20/19 and 3/17/19 was inside of the resident medical record. There was not an initial assessment in the medical record. An interview was conducted with the Unit Manager, Staff # 12 on 3/27/19 at 11:10 AM and s/he was asked when a resident is first admitted to the facility, when does the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of complaint and maintenance documentation it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure batteries for electronic lifts were charged and available for use and failed to have documentation of preventative maintenance of the lifts. This was found to be evident on 1 of the 2 nursing units. The findings include: Review of complaint MD00134906 revealed a concern regarding the batteries for the electronic lifts not being charged. Electronic lifts are used to assist staff with safely transferring residents. Review of the facility documentation revealed an inventory of 3 sling lifts and 3 sit to stand devices. All six of these pieces of equipment require the use of a portable battery in order to function. On 3/27/19 at 12:43 PM surveyor observed a sling lift in a resident's room, GNA #18 reported it had been working slow so the battery needs to be changed out. GNA #18 was then observed replacing the battery with a fully charged battery from the utility room. Afterwards, observation of the charging station…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$50,879 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $14,082 — penalty dated 2025-12-09
  • $36,797 — penalty dated 2024-05-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Crystal SpringsElkins, WV 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glen BurnieGlen Burnie, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At HomewoodBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Long GreenBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at GreenfieldMilwaukee, WI 1 of 5Nella's At Autumn Lake HealthcareElkins, WV 2 of 5Ashbrook Care & Rehabilitation CenterScotch Plains, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Arlington WestBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Ballenger CreekFrederick, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Baltimore WashingtonGlen Burnie, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At BridgeparkBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At CatonsvilleCatonsville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glade ValleyWalkersville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Loch RavenBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At MadisonMadison, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Memorial BridgePenns Grove, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At NorwalkNorwalk, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At OverleaBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At PikesvillePikesville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RuxtonTowson, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Salem CountySalem, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At SouthgateCarneys Point, NJ 2 of 5King David Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBaltimore, MD 2 of 5The Subacute At Autumn Lake HealthcareVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Alice ManorBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Calvert ManorRising Sun, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chevy ChaseChevy Chase, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Patuxent RiverLaurel, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Perring ParkwayBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RiverviewEssex, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Silver SpringSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Spa CreekAnnapolis, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Summit ParkCatonsville, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VinelandVineland, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VoorheesVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At West HartfordWest Hartford, CT 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare Post-Acute Care CenterBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at BeloitBeloit, WI 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at OceanviewOcean View, NJ 3 of 5Cornell Hall Care & Rehabilitation CenterUnion, NJ

Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
525 GLENBURN HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2021
STERN, ARYEHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2021
SCHWARTZ, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2021
BORODULIA, NICHOLASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
KRAMER, AMANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2024
EIDLISZ, SOLOMONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2025
GLUCK, RIVKAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2025
ACCURATE STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
BRAND SONNENSCHINE LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.3M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 16%Other / private 5%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$396per resident / day
operating cost
$12,035per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$370per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215221. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next