Autumn Lake Healthcare At Memorial Bridge

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 77.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 161 beds and averages 143.4 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint: NJ184164 Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate safety interventions to a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #124) with a history of refusal of care. On 3/4/25, Resident #124 fell when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #4) refused to allow the resident to close his/her door causing the resident to fall and hit the back of their head causing a laceration. Resident #124 was sent to the hospital for evaluation. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 Residents, (Resident # 124), reviewed for falls and evidenced by the following: On 5/28/25 at 11:19 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #124 in the C-wing dining room sitting in a chair. The C-wing unit was a locked unit for residents with behaviors. The surveyor attempted to speak with the resident but was unable due to cognitive impairment. On 5/29/25 the surveyor reviewed the admission Record, an admission summary, that revealed Resident #124 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0711 — pattern
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY COMPLAINT #2659218 Based on interview, medical record review and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 11/6/25 and 11/7/25, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician responsible for supervising the care of residents documented physician visit progress notes at the time of each visit. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1, #2, and #3), and was evidenced by the following:1.) Resident #1 was not at the facility at the time of the survey. A closed record review was conducted. A review of the admission Record (AR) revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: fracture of left pubis, hypertension, and myocardial infarction (decreased or complete cessation of blood flow to a portion of the myocardium). According to the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 10/16/25, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  COMPLAINT#: 2659218 Based on interview, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documents on 11/6/25 and 11/7/25, it was determined that the facility failed to implement and monitor weekly weights upon admission in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed and was evidenced by the following: Resident #1 was not at the facility at the time of the survey. A closed record review was conducted. A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: fracture of left pubis, hypertension, and myocardial infarction (decreased or complete cessation of blood flow to a portion of the myocardium). According to the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 10/16/25, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. During a review of Resident #1's electronic medical record on 11/6/25 at 1 PM, the surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 05/27/2025 at 11:02 AM, Surveyor #2 observed the following on A Unit: the wall to left of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door had peeling paint. The wall to the left of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had paint peeling under the chair rail. There was missing floor tile to the right of the nurse's station. The shower room had multiple missing tiles on the wall. On 05/27/2025 at 01:43 PM, Surveyor #2 observed the following on A Unit: the paint under the heater in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was chipped. The ice machine at the nurse's station was missing a tile near the drainpipe and the black pad underneath the ice machine had a straw under it. On 05/28/2025 at 12:07 PM, Surveyor #2 observed the following on A Unit: there was black debris/discoloration next to the wardrobe and under the heater in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was peeling paint on the door to the smoking area. There was a broken cover on the thermometer in the dining room. There was chipped and peeling paint on the door jam and molding near the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that identified furnished services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 4 of 33 (Resident # 13, 80, 44, 47) residents reviewed for care plans, specifically a resident that required a hand orthotic (Resident 13), a resident with a Positive Pres-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 2, and a resident that required oxygen (Resident #80). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 05/27/2025 at 10:12 AM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident # 80 in bed receiving Oxygen via nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen). Surveyor #1 reviewed Resident #80's medical record which reflected that the resident had a diagnosis which included asthma (narrowing and swelling of the airway). A review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # 173841 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper incontinence care was provided to 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Bowel and Bladder (Resident # 47) and 3 of 11 resident reviewed for incontinence rounds. (Resident # 6, Resident #113, and Resident # 402) This deficient practice was evident by the following: On 05/27/2025 at 09:59 during initial rounds Resident # 47 was observed in bed in a t-shirt with the covers at the bottom of the bed. Resident # 47 was observed to have a saturated incontinent brief. Resident # 47 was unsure of the last time he/she was changed. A review of Resident # 47's admissions record revealed that, Resident # 47 was admitted with but not limited to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (a condition where the prostate gland is enlarged), and Type 2 Diabetes (a chronic condition characterized by insulin resistance and high blood sugar levels.) A review of Resident #47's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed accommodate resident's need by not keeping the nurse's call bell within the resident's reach. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 33 residents (Resident #27 and #45) reviewed for accommodation of need and was evidenced by the following: Upon initial tour of the A Wing Unit on 05/27/2025 at 11:07 AM, the surveyor observed the call bell of Resident #27 on the floor underneath the head of the resident's bed. On the same date and time, the surveyor observed the call bell of Resident #45 wrapped around the wall unit of the nurse's call bell system. While in the room with the residents, a Certified Nursing Assistance (CNA) who identified herself as an agency nurse confirmed that nursing call bells were to be located on the bed within resident's reach and further stated, I cant fix everything here. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #27. A review of the admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0577 — isolated
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the most recent State of New Jersey inspection results in a place readily accessible to the residents, families, and the public. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the Resident Council Meeting on 05/29/2025 at 10:31 AM, four of four alert and oriented residents said they were not aware of the location of the State Survey results and that the facility had not spoken to them about the results. During a tour of each unit, the surveyor observed signs that stated the State Survey results were in the lobby. The C-wing unit is a locked unit. In the lobby the surveyor observed a sign on a buffet cabinet that said State Survey results here. The binder was located inside the buffet cabinet where a door had to be opened outward. During an interview on 05/29/2025 at 11:06 AM with the surveyor, the Unit Manager (UM) of C-wing said the Survey Results were in lobby and all the residents had to do was ask to see them. When asked if the State Survey result were readily accessible…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint: NJ184164 Based on interview, record review and document review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain documentation and ensure that a complete and thorough investigation was conducted for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #124) reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 05/28/2025 at 11:19 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #124 in the Dining Room of C Wing sitting in a chair. The surveyor attempted to speak with the resident but was unable to do so due to cognitive impairment. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to: Metabolic Encephalopathy and Unspecified Dementia (Unspecified Severity) with Psychotic Disturbance. A review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 05/20/2025, identified that the resident was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). A review of the resident's individual comprehensive care plan (ICCP) included a focus…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care for a resident with a indwelling, urinary catheter. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 254) reviewed for Urinary Catheter or UTI (Urinary Tract Infection). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 05/27/2025 at 10:37 AM during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident # 254 in bed in their room. At that time, the surveyor observed a urinary catheter drainage bag containing tinged, red urine. The drainage bag did not have a cover for privacy. At that time, the surveyor asked the resident if there was a device on his/her leg that secured the tube of the indwelling, urinary catheter. Resident # 254 denied having one and showed the surveyor his/her leg. There was no securement device observed on his/her leg. On 05/28/2025 at 11:23 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 254 in bed in their room. At that time, the surveyor observed the urinary catheter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NJ Complaint: #00173841 Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the prescriber's orders and acceptable professional standards and principles by administering medications past the required time frame. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for being free of significant med errors. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident #77's annual Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 03/08/2025, revealed that Resident #77 had a brief interview of mental status score of 0 which indicated he/she was not cognitively intact. A review of Resident #77's physician's orders revealed the following orders but not limited to Jardiance 10mg (milligrams, a medication used to manage and treat diabetes) one time a day, metoprolol tartrate 25mg (milligrams, a medication used to treat high blood pressure) twice a day, and Depakote Sprinkles delayed release 125mg (milligrams, a seizure medication often used for mood disorders) 3 capsules in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,935 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,935 — penalty dated 2025-06-02

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $492K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ