No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glade Valley

56 West Frederick Street, Walkersville, MD 21793 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 124 certified beds · (301) 898-4300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (301) 898-4300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0741, F0758)1 actual-harm citation$37,265 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0608, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (87) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $37,265 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-15)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8032 C LIBERTY Rd · (301) 846-0090 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
19 E Frederick St · (301) 845-4401 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.9 mi
151 Walkers Village Way · (301) 845-2844 · Call to confirm hours
Park
98 Kenneth Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased29.0%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.8%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.5%2.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.7%22.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.6%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%5.9%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.5%25.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.7%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.1%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.0%80.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.0%21.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.9%9.8%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.971.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.061.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 390 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
81.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 81.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 166 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.3%CMS range 54.0–63.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 8.6–12.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge81.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge72.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.5%CMS range 6.5–11.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.261.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
1.23
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.72
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.55
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.53
RN hoursweekends
52.3%
Total nursing turnover
63.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 113.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-01)
30
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

87 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 76 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were safe from accidents during mechanical lift transfers which resulted in harm to resident #16. This was evident for 1 (#16) of 1 resident reviewed for accidents. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and modify the care plan based on the resident's status. A medical record review on 11/1/23 at 9:24 AM, revealed a care plan for assistance for activities of daily living (ADL), such as bathing, moving from the bed to the chair, and toileting) initiated on 9/14/16. The interventions included one initiated on 2/17/23, that read that Resident #16 required 2 staff to transfer him/her with the mechanical lift. Review of a Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of pertinent documentation it was determined that the facility failed to prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: 1)The initial tour of the kitchen began on 5/26/26 at 8:15 AM. During this tour of the kitchen surveyor observed, with the Food Service Director (FSD) #6, in the walk-in refrigerator a metal container with meat in it with plastic wrap covering the container. Written in marker on the plastic wrap was an expiration date of 4/25. FSD #6 reported this was a pork loin they had just recently cooked and then would cut off pieces to make pork chops. She indicated the date was in error since they had just recently cooked the pork loin. FSD #6 removed the item from the refrigerator and indicated she was going to throw it out. On 5/27/26 at 2:00 PM during a follow-up tour of the kitchen, FSD #6 confirmed that they do have a cooling log that is used when they prepare items in advance that need…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure linens were processed in a manner that prevents cross contamination. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The findings include:On 5/28/26 at 12:20 PM, Laundry aide (Staff #27) explained her process as she demonstrated processing soiled linens. Staff #27 donned appropriate PPE while sorting and loading the washer with soiled linens. However, after doffing the washable gown and hanging it on the hook beside the sink, she proceeded to the clean side of the laundry room and started to fold clean linens.On 5/28/26 at 12:40 PM, Staff #27 was invited back to the soiled area of the laundry room. The account manager (Staff #28) followed into the soiled area of the laundry room. The observation of Staff #27 not performing hand hygiene before going into and folding clean linens was discussed with both staff. Staff #27 acknowledged and washed her hands. Staff #28 indicated that she would re-educate Staff #27 as it was part of her initial training.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-01 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately documented. This was evident for 3 (Residents #106, #5, #54) out of 6 Residents reviewed for Resident assessment. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is an assessment of the Resident that provides the facility with the necessary information to develop a care plan, deliver appropriate care and services to the Resident, and modify the care plan based on the Resident's status. 1) A review of Resident #106's medical record on 5/27/26 at 1:57 PM included an occupational therapy (OT) evaluation and plan of treatment dated 2/24/26, noting that the Resident had a limited range of motion (ROM) in all extremities. However, further review of Resident #106's MDS assessment dated [DATE] showed one-sided impairment in the resident's upper- and lower-extremity ROM. During an interview with staff #30, the regional therapy director, on 5/27/26 at 12:36 PM, she was asked whether Resident #106…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-01 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a physician documented the resident's current health status and failed to write, sign, and date new orders during physician visits. This was evident for 1 (Resident #59) of 1 resident reviewed for transmission-based precaution and 1 (Resident #123) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The Findings include:1) Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a common, long-term gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal pain, cramping, bloating, and recurring changes in bowel habits (such as diarrhea, constipation, or both).Resident #59 was admitted into the facility in early 2026 with diagnosis that included irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). During an interview on 5/26/26 at 9:18 AM, the resident stated, I was on an antibiotic for C. diff and was put on isolation but was taken off once they (the facility) found out I was ok.C. diff (short for Clostridioides difficile) is a highly contagious bacterium that infects the colon, causing severe inflammation and watery diarrhea. It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity, as evidenced by failing to knock and request permission before entering a resident's room. This was evident for one (Resident #85) of one Resident reviewed for dignity. The findings include:In an initial interview with Resident #85 on 5/26/26 at 11:36 AM, it was noted that staff sometimes failed to tell residents their names when entering their rooms to provide care, even when residents requested it. During the interview, it was observed that Resident 85 had activated the call light for help. Staff #3, a licensed practical nurse, entered Resident #85's room in response to the call light on 5/26/26 at 11:38 AM. However, the observation did not show that Staff #3 knocked on the Resident's door or requested permission before entering the room. The surveyor questioned Staff #3 at that time whether she knocked on Resident #85's door before entering the Resident's room, and she responded that she normally did; however, she did not do so when she answered Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify residents' representatives when a resident's status changed. This was evident for 2 related complaints (#2737149, and #2735716) for one resident (Resident #125), of 5 complaints reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:Resident #125 was an [AGE] year-old who was admitted to the facility in October 2025 with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction (stroke), depression, and dementia. A new diagnosis of displaced fracture of the base of neck of right femur was added to the resident's list of diagnoses on 2/02/26.A review of complaints #2737149 and #2745057 revealed that Resident #125 had an unwitnessed fall on 1/23/26 at approximately 1:45 AM and the complaint alleged that the facility did not immediately notify the resident's family. On 5/28/26 at 3:23 PM a review was conducted of Resident #125's medical record. The review revealed a document, titled Change in Condition, written on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide a notice of transfer to a resident's representative when the resident transferred to the hospital. This was evident for two related complaints (#2737149 and #2745057 regarding a fall for Resident #125) of 5 complaints reviewed for hospitalization.The findings include:Resident #125 was an [AGE] year-old who was admitted to the facility in October 2025 with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction (stroke), depression, and dementia. A new diagnosis of displaced fracture of the base of neck of right femur was added to the resident's list of diagnoses on 2/02/26.A review of complaints #2737149 and #2745057 revealed that Resident #125 had an unwitnessed fall on 1/23/26 at approximately 1:45 AM.On 5/28/26 at 3:45 PM a review of Resident #125's medical record was conducted which revealed a nurses note dated 1/23/26 at 9:52 AM, written by unit manager (Staff #21), that stated resident transferred to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within regulatory time frames to maintain current and accurate assessment records. This was evident for 3 (Residents #42, #5, #26) of 6 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment. The findings include:The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool that nursing home staff use to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. The information collected drives resident care planning decisions. The admission MDS is a comprehensive assessment for new Residents and, under some circumstances, for returning Residents. It must be completed by the end of day 14, considering the date of admission to the facility as day 1. Care Area Assessment (CAA) Completion Date: Must be completed on or before the 14th day after admission (Item V0200B2 in the MDS). The Annual MDS assessment is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed annually (at least…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 14 days of a resident's admission to hospice care. This was evident in one (Resident #8) of six residents reviewed for Resident assessment. The findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected on the MDS drives Resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure that each Resident receives the care they need. The nursing home should complete a Significant Change in Status MDS assessment within 14 days when there's a major decline or improvement in a resident's status. A record review on 6/1/26 at 10:19 AM showed an attending provider's order for a hospice care consultation for Resident #8. Continued review noted that Resident #8 was admitted to hospice care effective 5/7/26.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure nursing staff maintained professional standards in regard to documention of assessments. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #39) out of one resident reviewed for side rail usage.The findings include: Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed the resident has a developmental/intellectual disability and lacks adequate decision making capacity. The resident was admitted on [DATE], arriving on the unit at 7:50 PM. Further review of the medical record revealed an Assist Bar/Side Rail evaluation, with an effective date of 5/13/26 at 8:50 PM. This evaluation was signed by Nurse #11. This evaluation was noted to have been locked on 5/14/26 at 2:36 AM indicating the documentation was completed at that time. Review of the 5/13/26 Side Rail evaluation revealed in the section for Potential risks of using enabler bar/side rail include potential for injury such as fractures, bruises, entrapment and death discussed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 76 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and a review of records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received showers. This was evident for 2 (Residents #85, #8) of 6 Residents reviewed for ADLs. The findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. 1) During an initial tour of the facility on 5/26/26 at 11:12 AM, Resident #85's hair was observed to be matted and greasy. Resident #85 was questioned at that time about whether he/she had received showers and responded that the surveyor should look at his/her hair and determine whether he/she had received showers. Resident #85 added that he/she had received only bed baths (washing the Resident in bed). A record review on 5/27/26 at 12:02 PM included an MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to 1.) identify and follow up on a resident's significant abnormal laboratory value and 2.) ensure orders for psychiatric medications were kept active in the absence of a plan to reduce the dosage. This was evident in 1 complaint (#2735716 related to Resident #126) of 5 complaints reviewed during the annual survey, and 1 (Resident #3) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The findings include: 1) A complete blood count (CBC) is a laboratory test that checks, in part, for hemoglobin. Hemoglobin is an iron-rich protein inside a person's red blood cells. Its main job is to carry and transfer oxygen to the cells in the body. Hemoglobin is measured in grams per deciliter (g/dL) of blood. Normal levels of hemoglobin are between 12.0 -17.5 g/dL. A hemoglobin level between 7.1 - 9.5 g/dL is considered moderate anemia and would cause symptoms such as noticeable weakness, pale skin, and rapid heartbeat. An anticoagulant is a medication that stops the blood from clotting too easily by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with a limited range of motion received treatment and services to prevent further decline in the range of motion. This was evident for one (Resident #106) out of one resident reviewed for position and mobility. The findings include:An observation on 5/26/26 at 11:29 AM showed that Resident #106's fingers were bent at the knuckles and pressed into the left palm. The resident was unable to straighten them and had no device available. A subsequent observation on 5/27/26 at 1:57 PM showed Resident #106 sitting in the common area on the sugar loaf unit, still not wearing a device for the left-hand contracture. A record review noted a current care plan for Resident #106, initiated on 3/16/19 and revised on 10/26/22, which stated that the resident exhibits alterations in functional mobility related to contracture deformity. The care plan's goal stated that the resident will tolerate palm guard on left hand. A continued review of an occupational therapy (OT) evaluation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and observation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure informed consent was obtained prior to the initiation of side rails. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #39) out of one resident reviewed for side rail usage. The findings include:Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed the resident has an intellectual disability. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and a nursing note indicates the resident arrived at 7:50 PM. Review of the 5/15/26 Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status was not completed due to the resident being rarely or never understood. Two physicians determined that the resident lacks adequate decision-making capacity due to intellectual disabilities and developmental delay.On 5/26/26 at 10:44 AM surveyor attempted to interview Resident #39, but the resident was unable to answer questions. On 5/27/26 at 9:53 AM surveyor observed the resident had quarter side rails in the up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure pain medications were administered within the ordered parameters. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #3) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: On 5/28/26 review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an order, in effect on 3/4/26 for oxycodone (an opioid pain medication) 5 mg to be given every 6 hours as needed for pain rated greater than 6 out of 10 on a numeric pain scale. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed documentation that the oxycodone was administered on 3/4/26 for pain at a level of 4. Further review of the MAR revealed that from 3/10-3/17/26 there was an order for oxycodone 5 mg to be given every 6 hours as needed for pain rated greater than 6 out of 10 on a numeric pain scale. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed documentation that the oxycodone was administered on 3/13 for a pain level of 2; on 3/14 for a pain level of 3; on 3/15 for a pain level of 5; and on 3/16 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medication refrigerator temperatures were consistently monitored and documented to verify that medications requiring refrigeration were stored within appropriate temperature ranges. This deficient practice was observed in 1 (Sugarloaf Unit) of 2 medication storage refrigerators reviewed.The findings include:On 5/28/26 at 10:00 AM, following a medication administration observation, the surveyor conducted a review of the medication storage room on the Sugarloaf unit with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4. During the observation, LPN #4 opened the medication room and unlocked the medication refrigerator.On 5/28/26 at 10:05 AM, the surveyor requested to review the refrigerator temperature log. The unit manager stated that the temperature log was not maintained near the medication refrigerator in the medication storage room and left the area to retrieve it. After a few moments, LPN #4 returned with the temperature log and held it in front of the surveyor for review.Review of the May 2026 medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to have a qualified food service director. This was found to be evident for the one out of one food service director at the facility. The findings include On 5/26/26 at 8:15 AM while conducting the initial tour of the kitchen, Staff #6 was asked if she was the Food Service Director. Staff #6 referenced her name tag which stated Account Manager but indicated she was the person in charge. Staff #6 reported she was currently in training to become a Certified Dietary Manager but confirmed she did not at present have that certification.Review of the list of key personnel that was provided by the facility identified the Food Service Director as Staff #6.On 5/27/26 at approximately 1:00 PM surveyor interviewed Registered Dietitian (RD) #9 in the office of the main kitchen. RD#9 reported she is at the facility 3 days a week and another RD is in the building on Fridays. When asked if she acts as a kitchen supervisor, RD #9 reported only when specifically asked to assist. If a qualified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation and review of menus it was determined that the facility failed to ensure menus were followed as posted. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #76) out of one resident included in the sample for review of food. The findings include: During an interview on 5/26/26 at 8:55 AM regarding food, Resident #76 reported: you get choices but sometime they serve me something else. On 5/27/26 at 5:28 PM surveyor observed staff deliver Resident #76's dinner tray to the resident. The tray included: two egg salad sandwiches; broccoli, and potato salad. No dessert was observed on this tray. Review of the Resident Meal Change ticket revealed the resident had requested the B meal. One of the B meal items was egg salad sandwich with chips. No chips were observed on the resident's tray. The resident expressed concern that no peach parfait was included on the tray. Surveyor observed that there was no dessert on the tray. Review of the menu posted in the hallway revealed the alternative meal items for this dinner were: egg salad sandwich, broccoli salad and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the psychiatric providers notes were accurately documented. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #3) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: On 5/28/26 review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an order, in effect since 3/2/26 for Sertraline (an antidepressant) to be given one time a day for depression. Review of the Medication Administration Records (MAR) revealed the medication was being administered daily as ordered since 3/2/26. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident was seen by the psychiatric nurse practitioner (NP #5) on 3/6/26. Review of the corresponding note revealed the resident was being seen to evaluate for agitation, anxiety and depression. The diagnosis included adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. Review of the list of active medications failed to include the use of the Sertraline or any other antidepressant medication. Review of the Assessment and Plan section of the note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on administrative record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident was free of verbal abuse while in the care of a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA). This was evident for 1 (#7) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include:Verbal abuse is defined as the willful use of oral, written, or gestured language that includes disparaging, derogatory, or threatening terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance, regardless of the resident's age, ability to comprehend, or disability. On 1/15/26 at 9:54 AM, a review of the facility's investigation for facility reported incident #354455 revealed the facility had substantiated verbal abuse based on resident and staff interviews. The facility's investigation revealed on 6/19/25, approximately 6:30 PM, there was a verbal argument between Staff #4, Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) and Resident #7 and foul language was exchanged between them. As a result of the facility's investigation, Staff #4, was terminated for his/her actions and reported to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on administrative record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to immediately report allegations of abuse to the facility administration and the state agency. This was evident for 1 (#7) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: On 1/15/26 at 9:54 AM, a review of the facility's investigation documentation for facility reported incident, #354455, which alleged a verbal altercation with profane words exchanged between Staff #4, GNA and Resident #7 occurred on 6/19/25 at approximately 6:30 PM and was witnessed by Staff #2, GNA. Following the altercation, Staff #4, GNA did not report his/her altercation with Resident #7 to the administration, and Staff #2, GNA failed to notify the facility's administration of the witnessed the verbal altercation. Following the incident, In a resident interview statement, on 6/19/25, Staff #1, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN),Unit Manager (UM) documented Resident #7 requested to speak to a manager. When Staff #1, LPN, UM, accompanied by Staff #14, LPN, Shift Supervisor, went to speak with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and resident and staff interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse. This was evident for 1 (#5) of 5 residents reviewed for Abuse. The findings include:Facility reported incident #2675137 and Resident #5's medical record were reviewed concurrently on 1/20/26 at 9:15 AM. The facility's report revealed that Resident #5's family member called the facility on 11/21/25 at 9:25 AM and reported the resident told them a nurse threw urine in his/her face. The facility reported the incident to the state agency and conducted an investigation. The facility's investigation documentation included an Abuse Allegation Incident Report dated 11/21/25 11:00 (it did not indicate AM or PM) by Staff #1 the Sugarloaf Unit Manager. The report included Nursing Description: Resident alleging GNA intentionally threw urine in [his/her] face after [s/he] threw a full urinal bottle towards him/her. A written statement dated 11/21/25 7:27 PM was signed by Staff #5 an agency GNA (Geriatric Nursing Assistant) assigned to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of pertinent documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the appropriate care for activities of daily living to residents for a resident who was dependent on staff for showers and bathing. This was evident for 1 (#) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. The findings include:ADLs are activities that people perform every day such as, getting dressed, taking showers or baths, cooking, and eating. On 1/16/26 at 11:11 AM, a review of complaint #2663151 which was received at the state office on 10/31/25, alleged while Resident #8's hygiene was poor prior to being discharged home from the facility and days the resident never got cleaned up A review of associated complaint #2663151, received at the state office on 11/7/25, alleged while at the facility, Resident #8, who was bedbound, incontinent and dependent on staff for care, was often left soiled for extended periods of time without assistance. Review of Resident #8's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement the use of a gait belt resulting in avoidable falls. This was evident for 1 (#14) of 6 residents reviewed for a complaint. The findings include: Hemiparesis is weakness on one side of the body and hemiplegia is paralysis that affects only one side of the body. A gait belt (transfer belt) is a safety device used to stabilize, guide, or support a patient during mobility. On 1/22/26 at 9:43 AM, a review of complaint #2716523 was conducted. The complaint alleged that while at the facility recovering from a stroke, Resident #14 had three falls (10/24/25, 11/6/25, 11/27/25) in the presence of a staff member who failed to put a gait belt on the resident. On 1/22/25 at 10:30 AM, a review of Resident #14's electronic medical record (EMR) was conducted. The medical record documented Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in mid-October 2025 following an acute hospitalization with diagnosis which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct thorough investigations of an allegation of abuse. This was evident for 4 (Resident #9, #71, #77, #33) of 10 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1) On 4/22/25 at 2:06 PM, in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated that a thorough investigation of alleged abuse should include real-time documentation in Nurse Progress Note in Point Click Care (PCC- an electronic health record) and notification of the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and DON. The nurse should have performed and documented a risk management assessment. The DON stated, I expect these to be documented in PCC and to be part of the investigation file. On 4/28/25 at 12:30 PM, a record review of the facility-initiated incident report revealed: On 1/21/25 at 11:55 AM Resident #9 and her friend, the complainant, made Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #9) aware of alleged verbal abuse that occurred on 1/19/25 between Geriatric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide privacy to a resident during a dressing change. This was evident for 1 (Resident #108) of 4 residents observed for pressure ulcer care. The findings include: On 04/24/25 at 01:16 PM during an observation of Resident #108's dressing change, the resident's frontal private area was exposed. The privacy curtain was only half drawn around the bed. Present were the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #6), unit manager (Staff #41), and an unidentified Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA). During the observation, another unidentified GNA entered the resident's room to collect meal trays. The surveyor informed the second GNA that Resident #108 was having personal care provided and tried to redirect the GNA. The GNA proceeded into the room, walked past the exposed resident, and stated I know, I'm collecting the [roommate for Resident #108] tray. On 4/24/25 at 4:10 PM in an interview with the unit manager (LPN #3), she was informed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, pertinent document review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective process in place to ensure that the residents receive their choices from the alternative menu. This was evident for 1(Resident #69) in a random dining observation. The findings include: On 4/24/25 at 6:52 PM an observation in the dining room of the [NAME] Grove nursing unit was made. An observation of Resident #69's dinner tray revealed two separate meal tickets laying on the dinner tray. One of the meal tickets was titled Resident meal change. It revealed that a peanut butter & Jelly sandwich was circled and extra gravy was handwritten on the ticket. The second meal ticket indicated that the resident was to receive hot tea. Observation of Residents #69's dinner plate revealed steak and rice with no gravy and failed to reveal a peanut butter sandwich or hot tea. On 4/24/25 at 7:00 PM, interviews were conducted with the residents sitting at the table with Resident #69. Resident #88…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Beneficiary Protection Notifications were issued to residents discharged from Medicare Part A services but had benefit days remaining and intended to remain at the nursing facility receiving non-skilled care. This was evident for 2 (Resident #5, #39) of 3 residents reviewed for Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Protection Notification. The findings include: Residents with Medicare Part A have certain rights and protections related to financial liability and appeals. The financial liability, appeal rights, and protections are communicated to beneficiaries through notices given by providers to residents who are being discharged from Medicare services but have Medicare benefit days remaining. The notices include: Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC): This must be issued at least two calendar days before the last day of Medicare coverage. The NOMNC informs the beneficiary of his/her right to an expedited review of the services termination. The resident and/or their representative must…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and observation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean home-like environment. This was evident for 1 shower room out of 2 shower rooms observed during a survey. The findings include: On 4/25/25 at 8:06 AM, Resident #69, a long-term resident of the facility, reported to the surveyor that the [NAME] Grove shower room floors had a black and brown substance on/in the cracks in the shower room floor. On 4/25/25 at 8:15 AM an observation of the Sugar Loaf shower room was made with the nurse unit manager (Staff #5). The observation revealed cracks along the grout edge of the floor in the two of the three shower stalls rooms. In addition, small black and brown spots were visible in the cracks of the shower stall floor. Staff #5 reported she would notify housekeeping and maintenance. On 4/25/25 at 9:51 AM The Maintenance Director (Staff #18) was interviewed. Staff #18 reported that he was aware of the concerns with the shower stall floors. He reported that he recommended the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to identify a Grievance Official in the facility's grievance policy, and failed to ensure that grievances were followed up with a written response. This was evident for 5 of 5 grievance investigations reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: A review of the facility's grievance policy, dated 12/22/22 revealed Name and Title instead of the grievance officer's name, and List contact information instead of the actual contact information. Further review of the policy revealed the following definition: The Grievance Official for the facility navigates the grievance process as a part of resident rights by receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusions; leading any necessary investigations by the facility, issuing written grievance decisions to the resident; and coordinating with state and federal agencies as necessary in light of specific allegations. On 04/28/25 at 02:44 PM, a review of the grievance investigations for February 2025 was conducted with documents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to report a resident's allegation of missing money. This was evident for 1 (Resident #263) and was discovered during the investigation of the facility reported incident #MD00212599. During the survey 15 facility reported incidents were investigated. The findings include: A review of the facility reported incident (FRI # MD00212599) revealed that Resident #373 alleged that on 12/02/24 money was missing from the locked drawer in his/her room. A review of the facility's investigation file failed to reveal evidence that any other residents were asked if they also had money missing. On 4/30/25 at 9:44 AM an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) to review the facility's investigation of FRI #MD00212599. When the NHA was asked if any other residents had reported missing money, the NHA said, yes, Resident #373's roommate (Resident #263) also reported missing money on the same date as Resident #373's. The NHA said she did not report Resident #263's allegation of missing money to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately recorded. This was evident for 2 (Resident #39, #48) of 4 residents reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM), 1 (Resident #40) of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, and 1 (Resident #110) of 3 closed record reviews. The findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the Resident that provides the facility information necessary to develop a care plan, provide the appropriate care and services to the Resident, and modify the care plan based on the Resident's status. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure that each Resident receives the care they need. 1) A record review for Resident #39 on 4/21/25 at 1:48 PM included occupational and physical therapy evaluations dated 11/29/24 that had recorded that Resident #39 had impaired ROM to his/her left lower extremity and full ROM to both upper extremities. However, continued review of Resident #39's MDS assessments dated 12/1/24 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on pertinent document review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to perform a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASSAR) screen within 40 days of the resident admission. This was evident for 1 (Resident #69) out of 4 residents reviewed for PASSAR screening during a survey. The findings include: On 4/21/25 at 11:57 AM Resident #69, was a long-term resident of the facility. Review of medical records revealed Resident # 69 has a pre-admission screening and resident interview (PASSAR) screening completed on 12/12/23. Further review revealed that the attending physician certified, before admission to the nursing facility, that the resident is likely to require less than 30 days at the nursing facility. On 4/22/25 a review of Residents medical record failed to reveal an additional PASSAR completed within 40 days of Resident # 69 residing in the facility. 04/22/25 04:53 PM The Administrator was interviewed. She confirmed that Resident #69 was required to have new PASSAR screen after residing in the facility more than 40 days. The Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan. This was evident for 1 (Resident #369) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and injuries. The findings include: Resident #369 was admitted to the facility for short-term managed care rehabilitation following hospitalization due to weakness related to a recent COVID-19 infection and chemotherapy treatment for cancer. The resident also presented with unstageable sacral wounds and history of depression, anxiety, and pain. A baseline care plan is a detailed, initial plan developed for each resident within 48 hours of their admission. It outlines the essential care instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care. This plan serves as a foundation for the residents' overall care, ensuring continuity and staff communication. On 4/29/25 at 8:50 AM, in response to complaint MD00204145, the surveyor reviewed Resident #369's medical record which revealed that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan. This was evident for 1 (Resident #369) out of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and injuries. The findings include: Resident #369 was admitted to the facility for short-term managed care rehabilitation following hospitalization due to weakness related to a recent COVID-19 infection and chemotherapy treatment for cancer. The resident also presented with unstageable sacral wounds and history of depression, anxiety, and pain. A comprehensive care plan is a detailed, individualized document that outlines a resident's goals, needs, and the services they will receive to achieve those goals. It's a collaborative effort involving the residents (if able), their family, and the care team, and it's designed to improve their overall well-being. Facilities are required to complete a comprehensive MDS assessment within 14 days of the resident's admission, and the care plan must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were reviewed and revised after a change in a resident's condition. This was evident for 1 (Resident #48) of 2 residents reviewed for care planning. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses each Resident's unique needs. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the Resident's care. They must be developed within 7 days of completion of a resident's admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and revised at least every quarter (or more often as needed). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment is a federally mandated assessment tool that nursing home staff use to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. The information collected is used in the Resident's care planning decisions. The facility must have care plans developed and revised by an interdisciplinary team (IDT), including the attending physician, a registered nurse, a nursing aide, a representative from dietary services, the Resident, and the Resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, interviews and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) were provided with showers and incontinence care. This was evident for 3 (Resident #57, #366, #365) of 3 residents reviewed for ADL. The findings include: 1) In an observation on 4/21/25 at 12:20 PM, Resident #57 was observed sitting in a Geri-chair, in the unit dining area, and was noted with white flaky particles in facial hair and on his/her clothes. In a subsequent observation on 4/24/25 at 5:01 PM, Resident #57 was noted lying in bed and continued to have white, flaky particles in his/her facial hair. A record review later that day contained an MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set- a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs) dated 2/4/25 for Resident #57. The MDS had recorded that Resident #57 depended on staff for most of his/her self-care needs. A continued review of Resident #57's order summary report as of April 2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications and treatments were administered per physician orders. This was evident in 1 (Resident #363) of 53 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: Resident #363 has a medical history of kidney failure, congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), depression, and chronic pain. On 4/30/25 at 8:10 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #363's Medication Administration Records (MAR) and Treatment Administration Records (TAR), which revealed multiple instances of missed medications and treatments that had been ordered by the resident's physician. The missed medications and treatments are as follows for March 2025: -3/31 - Mirtazapine 15 mg -3/19 & 3/31 - Rocklatan Ophthalmic Solution 0.02-0.05% -3/19 & 3/31 - Buspirone 7.5 mg -3/19 & 3/31 - Trospium Chloride 20 mg -3/21 - Behavior monitoring for medication side effects (related to Buspar, Hydroxyzine, Remeron, and Zoloft) -3/21 - Observation for side effects related to psychotropic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on pertinent document review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment for a pressure injury. This was evident for 3 (Residents # 364, #369 and #108) out of 4 Resident reviewed for Pressure injury during a survey. The findings include: 1) On 4/29/25 at 12:50 PM a review of intake #MD00215184 revealed a concern regarding Resident #364's medical treatment during their stay at the facility. On 4/29/25, a review of medical records revealed that Resident #364 was transported to the hospital 2 days after admission to the facility. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed that resident #364 had a pressure injury described as moisture related skin injury. The continued review of the medical record revealed that Resident #364 returned to the facility on 1/3/25 . On 4/29/25 at 1:15 PM a review of Resident #364's medical record revealed that s/he received visits by the wound care team on 1/16/25, 1/23/25 and 1/30/25. Review of the wound care team's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective process in place to ensure that recommendations from therapy are communicated to the nursing staff, failed to provide treatment to maintain a resident's range of motion (ROM), and failed to provide necessary adaptive equipment during meals. This was evident for 2 (Residents #50, #48) out of 4 reviewed for position and mobility and 1 (Resident #108) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during a survey. The findings include: 1) On 4/21/25 at 4:33 PM Resident # 50, a long-term resident of the facility, was interviewed. During the interview s/he reported that s/he used to have a leg/ankle splint that s/he kept in their room, but now the splint is kept in the therapy room. Resident #50 stated s/he had worn the ankle when s/he walked. On 4/24/25 at 10:45 AM a review of a physical therapy discharge summary revealed that Resident #50 received Physical therapy in February 2025 through April 4th, 2025. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide proper urinary catheter care. This was evident for 1 (Resident #108) reviewed during the initial screening of the 32 residents of the Catoctin unit during the recertification survey. The findings include: A record review revealed an order dated 04/02/25 for Foley catheter 16 FR with 10cc balloon to bedside straight drainage for diagnosis of hx [history] of urine retention on Resident #108's Treatment Administration Record (TAR). A urinary catheter is a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine. When a catheter is in use, the drainage bag must be kept below the level of the bladder at all times to ensure urine flows by gravity, which helps prevent urine backflow into the bladder and reduces the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs). This positioning is a standard infection control practice and is typically outlined in facility policy and The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for catheter care. On 4/21/25 at 1:57 PM Resident #108 was observed in his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have an order in place for oxygen administration and failed to follow an attending physician's order to administer oxygen to a resident. This was evident for 2 Resident (Resident #74, #315) of 3 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care during the survey. The findings include: On 4/21/25 at 1:57 PM, Resident #74, a long-term resident of the facility, was observed in his/her room with oxygen being administered through a nasal cannula at a rate of 2 liters per min (2L/min). On 4/21/25 a review of Resident #74's orders failed to reveal an order for oxygen. On 4/22/25 at 7:44 AM, surveyor alerted Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #6) regarding concerns with oxygen order in the facility. On 4/22/25 at 3:12 PM, a review of the medication administration report (MAR) revealed that Resident #74 received oxygen on 3/1/25 through 3/26/25. The oxygen order was discontinued when Resident #74 was transferred to the hospital on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee files and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct annual nursing staff performance reviews ensuring competencies in their skills. This was evident for 5 out of 5 employee files (#3, #15, #26, #36 and #39) reviewed for skill competencies during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 4/22/25 at 7:38 AM, in an interview with the Director of Human Resource (Staff # 37), she communicated that staff must, as a condition of employment, complete annual online in-service training and maintain competencies. On 4/30/25 at 10:21 AM, in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she could not provide documentation of staff competencies, and stated, The process for tracking staff training and competencies is broken. On 4/30/25 at 12:47 PM, Staff #37 acknowledged that the facility did not maintain employee records. On 4/30/25 at 1:09 PM, a review of employee files (#3, #15, #26, #36 and #39) revealed that all staff were missing documentation for annual skill competencies.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) personnel files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to conduct yearly performance reviews and ensure twelve (12) hours of annual in-service education was provided. This was evident for 2 (GNA #15 and GNA #36) of 2 personnel files reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 4/22/25 at 11:52 AM, a review of GNA #15's and GNA #36's personnel files lacked evidence of yearly evaluations and 12 hours of in-service education. On 4/30/25 at 10:21 AM, in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she acknowledged that annual performance reviews are supposed to be completed by the DON or unit manager and stated they're supposed to be in the employee file. On 4/30/25 at 12:47 PM, the Director of Human Resources (Staff #37) confirmed that the on-line training takes 9.4 hours to complete, and that the facility was deficient in maintaining employee records. No other documentation was provided to show additional GNA training hours for the remaining 2.6 hours.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a controlled substance logbook was signed by 2 licensed staff at change of shifts. This was evident for 1 of 4 controlled substance logbooks inspected during the survey. The findings include: Controlled substance logbooks are typically kept in medication carts and are used to determine that drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs are maintained with sufficient detail. All controlled substances kept in the medication cart should match their record in the drug control book. On 4/22/25 at 11:55 AM, a review of the controlled substance logbook for April of 2025, on cart #2 in the Catoctin unit of the facility was conducted. The review revealed that the documentation had several columns to indicate information that include the date, time, nurse counting out, and nurse counting in. The review identified several concerns that include: a) Dates were not all in chronological order b) Dates with only 1 signature from a licensed staff c) Dates with no signature from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the attending physician reviewed irregularities identified by the pharmacist, acted upon them in a timely manner, and documented them in the Resident's medical record. This was evident for 1 (Resident #40) of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: A medical record review on 4/23/25 at 1:12 PM showed a consultant pharmacist's note that indicated that Resident #40's monthly medication regimen review (MRR) was completed on 10/16/24 with irregularities identified. The note stated, see report comments/recommendation(s). However, the continued review failed to show the report filed in Resident #40's medical record and documentation that the Resident's attending provider reviewed and addressed the recommendation. In an interview on 4/24/25 at 7:57 AM, a Unit Manager Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #2), reported that once the irregularity on the MRR was addressed, it was kept on the Resident's hard chart. However, staff stated she could not find the report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were provided or attempted prior to administering a psychotropic medication. This was evident for 1 (Resident #371) of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Resident #371 was admitted to the facility in early 2024. A review of the complaint related to MD00202745 alleged that the resident was over sedated due to the combination of medications that were being administered to the resident. On 4/23/25 at 2:17 PM, a review of Resident #371's medical record was conducted. The review revealed that the resident was prescribed Ativan (Lorazepam) on an as needed basis from 1/10/24 to 1/24/24. The electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) indicated that the Ativan was administered on 1/11/24, 1/14/24, and 1/18/24. Lorazepam (Brand name- Ativan) is used to treat anxiety disorders. It is also used for short-term relief of the symptoms of anxiety or anxiety caused by depression. Lorazepam is a benzodiazepine that works in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled properly as evidenced by failing to discard expired medications and failing to date medications when they were opened. This was evident in 1 of 2 medication storage rooms and 3 of 4 medication carts inspected during the survey. The findings include: An inspection of 2 medication storage rooms and 4 medication carts was conducted during the recertification survey. Concerns identified during the inspection were: 1) On 4/22/25 at 9:48 AM, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #6) was interviewed about her process in restocking her medication cart. LPN #6 reported that most medications come from the pharmacy and the rest were kept in the medical records room. On 4/22/25 at 10:04 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that most medications are supplied by the pharmacy that are specific to the residents. The few medications that are supplied by the facility were stored in the medical records room. The DON accompanied the surveyor to the medical records room for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and pertinent document review, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that Residents receive their meal in a timely manner and at a palatable temperature. This was evident for 1 of 1 food test tray reviewed during a survey. The findings include: On 4/21/2025 at 1:54 PM, Resident #74, a long-term resident of the facility, was interviewed. During the interview s/he reported that food is often late and does not have a palatable taste or temperature. On 4/24/25 at 7:20 AM, the Surveyor observed breakfast Catoctin cart 1 delivered to the unit by dietary Staff #33. On 4/24/25 at 7:21 AM, review of Document titled Glade Valley Center: Meal Deliver log revealed that the breakfast tray line starts at 7:00 AM and contains a nurse initial that the tray was received on the unit at 7:20 AM On 4/24/25 7:40 AM continued observation of Catoctin cart 1, failed to reveal that any trays were removed from the cart. Continous observation revealed the last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care documentation was accurate. This was evident for 1 (Resident #108) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The findings include: A record review revealed a physician's order dated 4/15/25 stating, Apply foam adaptors at meal times. Nursing to apply with meals for optimum intake and independence. A review of the Medication Administration Record for April 2025 revealed that the nursing staff had been documenting that Resident #108 used adaptive device for each shift from 4/16/25 through 4/24/25. On 4/24/25 at 6:16 PM, Resident #108 was observed as he/she ate dinner in bed without the use of any adaptive utensils. The resident, the resident's spouse, and the therapy director (Staff #23) were present. Staff #23, the spouse, and the resident all confirmed that the adaptive device had not been available for the past week. Staff #23 also said that the device was supposed to be stored at the resident's bedside. On 04/25/25 at 1:01 PM during an interview with unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were followed when 1) an unlabeled, uncovered bedpan was left on the handrail in a resident's bathroom, and 2) hand hygiene was not performed during a dressing change of a pressure ulcer. This was evident for 1) 1 (Resident #109) of 6 residents in the initial screening pool, and 2) 1 (Resident #108) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The findings include: 1) On 4/21/25 at 11:44 AM, an observation was conducted of Resident #109's bathroom. An unlabeled and uncovered bedpan was against the wall on top of a hand rail, and an unlabeled and uncovered bath basin was upside down with bath linens on the floor. On 4/21/25 at 2:55 PM, during an interview with Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA #1) she said that she did not know to whom the bedpan and bath basin belonged since they were not labeled. The GNA acknowledged that the bedpan and bath basin should not have been there and that the usual process was to clean them and then place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a Residents shower rooms in good repair. This was evident for 1 out of 2 resident shower rooms observed during a survey. The findings include: On 4/29/25 at 3:15 PM, Resident #69, a long-term resident of the facility, was interviewed. During the interview s/he reported that he/she had received a skin tear in the shower room when his/her arm rubbed against a jagged edge on a shelf in the shower room. On 4/29/25 at 3:17 PM, an observation of the Sugar Loaf shower room revealed a shelf at the back of the room. The shelf had a lament cover. Approximately 1 foot of the laminated edge was peeling off. Further observation revealed clear tape was placed over the edges of the lament, creating a smooth edge. On 4/29/25 at 3:31 PM, the Sugar Loaf nurse unit manager (Staff #5) was interviewed. Staff #5 confirmed that on 4/10/25, Resident #69 received a skin tear, when his/her arm rubbed against a sharp edge on the shelf in the resident shower room. Staff #5 reported that she logged the concern with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews of employee files and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a system that provides and tracks the required training for dementia management, abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. This was evident for 5 of 5 random employee files (Staff #3, #15, #26, #36 and #39) and 1 employee reviewed for an allegation of abuse during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 4/22/25 at 7:38 AM, in an interview with the Director of Human Resource (HR) (Staff #37), she communicated that staff must, as a condition of employment, complete the required annual in-service training. On 4/30/25 at 8:33 AM, in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she explained that annual training is through Carefeed. All employees receive an email and/or text to complete the required training. Human Resources tracks staff participation. If an employee doesn't stay current, they are removed from the schedule- that's my practice, I can't speak for other departments. On 4/30/25 at 08:46 AM, in a subsequent interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a record review of a facility reported incident, employees' file and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Geriatric Nurse Assistants (GNA's) received training that included dementia management, abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. This was evident for 4 of 4 GNA's employee files (#15, #21, #29 and #36) reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 4/22/25 at 7:38 AM, in an interview with the Director of Human Resource (HR) (Staff #37), she communicated that staff must, as a condition of employment, complete the required annual in-service training. On 4/22/25 at 11:52 AM, a review of employee records for facility GNA's #15 and #36 and agency GNA's #29 and #36's revealed the lack of required training. On 4/30/25 at 08:46 AM, in an interview with Staff #37, she explained that HR is responsible for tracking facility staff's compliance through Carefeed and that nursing leadership tracks agency compliance. On 4/30/25 at 10:07 AM, in an interview with the DON, she acknowledged that agency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that their residents were free of misappropriation of property as evidenced by a staff member taking a resident's personal property from the facility without their permission. This was evidenced by 1 (#13) of 12 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility with the information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. On 11/14/23 at 8:30 PM, a review of the facility's investigation file revealed a statement from the Maintenance Director (MD) #7 which documented that he was approached by Resident #13 on 2/7/23, who reported to him that their wedding rings were missing. According to his statement, Unit Manager (UM) #2 was aware and bringing forms for the resident to complete regarding the missing property. Furthermore, he noted that, on 2/8/23, the resident told him that Maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0680 — isolated
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified Activity Director. This was evident for 1 of 1 Activity Director. The findings include: On 11/14/23 at 11:30 AM, an interview with the Activity Director revealed that he did not meet the qualifications for the position. He reported that he was currently enrolled in an approved training program. On 11/14/23 at 12:24 PM, an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) revealed that the Activity Director had been hired a year ago and confirmed he was currently enrolled in an approved training program. Furthermore, she reported that they had an activity consultant to oversee his work while he was completing the training. A review of the Activity Director's employee file on 11/15/23 at 2:30 PM, revealed he had been hired in 9/22. There was a copy of a certificate that he had completed Module 1 of the approved training program on 8/4/23, 11 months after the hire date. On 11/15/23 at 2:40 PM, a review of the activity consultant notes, dated 3/20/23, revealed that the facility was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident quality care based on standards of professional practice for a pressure ulcer/injury. This was evident for 1 (#14) of 3 resident reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury. The findings include: Pressure Ulcer/Injury (PU/PI) refers to localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. A pressure injury will present as intact skin and may be painful. A pressure ulcer will present as an open ulcer, the appearance of which will vary depending on the stage and may be painful. The injury occurs as a result of intense and/or prolonged pressure or pressure in combination with shear. Soft tissue damage related to pressure and shear may also be affected by skin temperature and moisture, nutrition, perfusion, co-morbidities and condition of the soft tissue. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-10-15 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that nurse aides were receiving performance evaluations annually and that in-services training was provided to the nurse aide based on the outcome of the performance evaluation. This was evident for 2 of 2 staff reviewed for annual performance evaluations. The findings include: On 10/7/21 at 8:34 AM, a review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #62's employee file revealed that GNA #62 had been employed for 4 years and there was no evidence found of performance evaluations. On 10/7/21 at 8:44 AM, a review of GNA #63's employee file revealed that GNA #63 had been employed for 16 years and no evidence was found that performance evaluations were completed. An interview with the Infection Control Preventionist/Nurse Practice Educator (ICP/NPE) #1 on 10/7/21 at 12:03 PM, revealed that he/she had been working on a schedule for competencies and was determining which competencies to include in the training based on problems the facility staff had identified. However,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-10-15 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — widespread
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training to staff related to mental and psychosocial disorders that affected residents with trauma and a history of post-traumatic stress disorders as evidenced by those residents being identified in Facility Assessment Tool, however, there was no documentation that such training was provided to staff. This was evident for 4 (#60, #61, #62, and #63) of 4 facility staff reviewed. The findings included: On 10/7/21 at 8:34 AM, a review of the employee file for Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #60 failed to reveal that GNA #60 had received training about how to care for residents with mental and psychosocial disorders that included residents with trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder. On 10/7/21 at 8:34 AM, a review of employee file for GNA #61 failed to reveal that GNA #61 had the required training for how to care for residents with mental and psychosocial disorders that had included residents with trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder. On 10/7/21 at 8:34 AM, review of employee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect multiple residents. The findings include: On 10/8/2021 at 12:51 PM, interview with Residents #14 and #74 revealed concerns about the cleanliness of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom. Observation of the bathroom at this time revealed dirt and debris stuck in the doorway of the bathroom where the tile and solid floor meet. On 10/8/2021 at 12:53 PM, the Sugarloaf Unit's shower room was observed with rings in the toilet. The shower stall furthest from the door was filled with multiple Hoyer lift swings, commode chairs, a linen cart and cardboard boxes rendering it unusable. The overhead lights in the remaining two stalls were not working. Both showers had black residue in the grout between tiles. A whirlpool tub was observed with a loose seal which was collecting dust and debris. Inspection of a bariatric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-10-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record and policy reviews, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a thorough investigation according to the abuse policy for 9 (#200, #204, #209, #210, #11, #69, #83, #35, #88) of 32 residents reviewed for abuse during an annual survey. The findings include: Review of the facility's updated 7/2019 Abuse Investigation and Reporting Policy documented, Role of the Investigator: The individual conducting the investigation will, as a minimum: Review the completed documentation forms; Review the resident's medical record to determine events leading up to the incident; interview the person(s) reporting the incident; Interview the witnesses to the incident; Interview the resident (as medically appropriate); interview the resident's attending physician as needed to determine the resident's current level of cognitive function and medical condition; Interview staff members (on all shifts) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-10-15 · tag F0608 — failed to report suspected crimes — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure (1) employees report any suspicion of a crime against any resident, according to timelines; (2) post the notice of employee rights; and (3) prohibit and prevent retaliation for reporting.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility policy reviews, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) ensure all allegations of abuse were timely reported to the appropriate state regulatory authority within the required time period and 2)ensure the procedures included in the document that was being utilized as their policy were implemented as evidenced by the failure to report allegations of abuse in a timely manner. This was evident for 11 (#95, #98, #99, #195, #197, #200, #202, #216, #35, #88, #69) of 32 residents reviewed for abuse during the annual survey. The findings include: Review of the facility's updated 7/2019 Abuse Investigation and Reporting Policy documented, An alleged violation of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment (including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property) will be reported immediately, but not later than: Two (2) hours if the alleged violation involves abuse OR has resulted in bodily injury; or Twenty-Four (24) hours if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility policy reviews, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to timely report allegations of abuse and the results of the investigations within the regulatory timeframes. This was evident for 10 (#95, #98, #99, #195, #197, #200, #202, #216, #35, #88) of 32 residents reviewed for abuse during the annual survey. The findings include: Review of the facility's updated 7/2019 Abuse Investigation and Reporting Policy documented, An alleged violation of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment (including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property) will be reported immediately, but not later than: Two (2) hours if the alleged violation involves abuse OR has resulted in bodily injury; or Twenty-Four (24) hours if the alleged violation does not involve abuse AND has not resulted in serious bodily injury. The Administrator or his/her designee, will provide the appropriate agencies or individuals listed above with a written report of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record and policy reviews, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigation allegations of abuse for 11 (#200, #204, #209, #210, #11, #69, #83, #35, #88, #69, #83)) of 32 residents reviewed for abuse during an annual survey. The findings include: Review of the facility's updated 7/2019 Abuse Investigation and Reporting Policy documented, Role of the Investigator: The individual conducting the investigation will, as a minimum: Review the completed documentation forms; Review the resident's medical record to determine events leading up to the incident; interview the person(s) reporting the incident; Interview the witnesses to the incident; Interview the resident (as medically appropriate); interview the resident's attending physician as needed to determine the resident's current level of cognitive function and medical condition; Interview staff members (on all shifts) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-15 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 1(#196) of 14 residents reviewed for falls, 2 (195, #206) of 32 residents reviewed for abuse and 1 (#95) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures that each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) Review of Resident #196's medical record on 10/6/21 at 9:17 AM revealed that the resident had a fall with no injuries on 6/30/20. Review of Resident #196's quarterly MDS, with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person centered care that were resident specific with measurable objectives and goals. This was evident for 4 (#196, #36, #62, #40) of 92 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) Review of Resident #196's medical record on 10/6/21 at 9:17 AM revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (an absence of enough oxygen in the tissues to sustain bodily functions) and hypoxemia (a low level of oxygen in the blood). Further review of Resident #196's medical record revealed a physician's order, written on 6/26/20, which stated, Oxygen at 2 L/min via Nasal Cannula continuously, every shift for Shortness of Breath related to ACUTE RESPIRATORY…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to review and revise the interdisciplinary care plans to reveal up to date interventions for residents who requested for certain staff not to care for them. This was evident for 6 (#95, #96, #210, #97, #24, #84) of 92 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) Review of facility reported incident MD00139227 on 10/13/21 at 9:30 AM revealed Resident #95 and Resident #96 did not feel comfortable when a particular GNA (geriatric nursing assistant) rendered care during ADL (activities of daily living). Resident #95 and Resident #96 were interviewed twice by facility administration and the second time expressed that they felt uncomfortable with a male GNA and wished to not have a male nursing assistant. A handwritten note from the Social Worker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records and other pertinent documentation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff did not erroneously document the administration of medications that were not available for administration. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #295) out of the 4 residents whose medical records were reviewed as part of the medication administration task. The findings include: On 10/6/21 at 11:44 AM, a review of Resident #295's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in September 2021 with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, kidney disease, and dementia. The resident had current orders for the following: -Fludrocortisone Acetate Tablet 0.1 mg give 1 tablet one time a day for sodium retention, originally ordered 9/18/21 -Rivastigmine Patch 24 hour apply 13.3 mg transdermally one time a day for the treatment of dementia, originally ordered 9/18/21. On 10/7/21, Review of the Proof of Delivery Shipment Detail report revealed 7 Rivastigmine patches had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and medical record review , it was determined the facility failed to ensure the physician addressed the resident's need for and use of oxygen in his assessment, failed to include orders for the use and monitoring of oxygen therapy, and failed to develop a care plan that included goals and interventions for respiratory care for a resident with a known history of respiratory issues. This was evident for 2 (#296, #84) of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) Medical record review on 10/06/21 at 08:25 AM revealed resident # 296 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Pneumonia due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA), Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Asthma with Acute Worsening. Hypoxia refers to a lack or low amount of oxygen in the tissues and cells of the body to maintain its normal function. A medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) ensure that expired medications and supplies were removed from medication storage areas and to ensure regular monitoring of the medication refrigerator temperature, 2) to keep medication carts locked and secured when unattended to prevent access from residents and unauthorized individuals and 3) to document administration of a controlled substance after signing out the medication on the controlled substance log . This was evident for 1 of 3 nursing units observed during an annual survey. This was found to be evident for two out of the two medication storage rooms, 1 of 3 nursing units and 1 (#62) of 5 residents reviewed for pain, respectively. The findings include: 1) On 10/7/21 at approximately 2:10 PM, surveyor observed the medication storage unit on the Catotin unit with the unit nurse manager (Staff #28). Several supply items were observed in this room and the unit nurse manager confirmed the supplies in this area would be used if needed. Surveyor identified a central…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to 1) implement infection control policies as evidenced by facility staff failing to date and initial oxygen tubing to ensure it was changed as needed and failed to change the normal saline by the expiration date written on the container and 2) failing to wear appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) prior to entering an identified isolation room [ROOM NUMBER] of a resident on contact precautions. This was evident for 2 of 92 residents (#84, #296) and one Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA#5) observed during the survey. The findings include: Oxygen therapy is the administration of oxygen at concentrations more significant than that in ambient air (20.9%) with the intent of treating or preventing the symptoms and manifestations of inadequate levels of oxygen. The nasal cannula is a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen or increased airflow to residents in need of respiratory help. This device consists…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-10-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents had a means of directly contacting staff. This was evident for 2 showers in the Sugarloaf Units shower room. The findings include: On 10/8/2021 at 12:53 PM, environmental observations of the Sugarloaf Unit shower room revealed that the emergency pull chords in the open shower stalls were wrapped around the assist bars, thus, preventing the call light system from being activated. The Director of Nursing was made aware of these findings on 1/8/2021 at 2:00 PM.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received their meals in a timely manner. This was found to be evident for 2 (resident # 349 & #367) out of 6 resident observed during the survey. The findings include: During a tour conducted on 10/04/2021 at approximately 7:45 am on the Catoctin Nursing Unit, the Surveyor observed staff deliver breakfast trays to the residents. During an interview conducted on 10/04/2021 at 8:20 am, on the Catoctin Nursing Unit, Resident #349 stated s/he had not received a breakfast tray. During an interview conducted on 10/04/2021 8:32 am, the Surveyor asked the Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #4 if Resident #349 had a breakfast tray, the GNA responded yes. The Surveyor observed the GNA retrieve Resident #349's breakfast tray from the food cart and deliver the tray to the resident's room. On 10/04/2021 at 8:35 am, the Surveyor advised the Nursing Supervisor #8 of the delayed breakfast tray delivered to Resident #349. On 10/04/2021 at 9:10 am, the Surveyor advised the Administrator and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-15 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records, facility documentation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property as evidenced by the removal of narcotic medication from residents' supply without administering the medication to the resident. This was found to be evident for two (Resident #145 and #146) out of the 32 residents reviewed for abuse during the survey. The findings include: Review of a facility reported incident (MD00167082) revealed that, on 5/8/21, oxycodone for residents #145 and #146 had been removed from the supply by nurse #59 but had not been administered to the residents. The police were notified and the nurse was reported to the state board of nursing. 1) On 10/5/21, a review of Resident #145's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in May of 2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to: joint replacement and pain. Review of the orders revealed an order with a start date of 5/4/21 for oxycodone 10 mg, to be given every 4 hours as needed, for pain on a scale of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-15 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that baseline care plans addressed all of the residents needs as evidenced by failure 1) to address pain management for a resident with pain related to a recent procedure; and 2) failed to address a residents respiratory interventions and goals for a resident with chronic lung disease. This was evident for 2(resident # 296 and # 298) of 2 residents reviewed for base line care plans during the annual survey. The findings include: A baseline care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It must be completed within 48 hours of a resident's admission and must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for each resident immediately upon their admission, which would address resident-specific health and safety concerns to prevent decline or injury. 1) Review of medical records for Resident # 298 on 10/04/21 at 8:21 AM revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence of the implementation of an ongoing program of activities that met the needs of Residents # 16, and #45 that was based on their abilities, interests and treatment . This was evident for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for activity needs during this annual survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care per CMS guidelines. 1. On 10/04/21 at 11:40 AM, during an interview, Resident #16 stated that Activities sStaff had not visited the resident to provide activity materials and had not invited the resident to participate in group activities. A review of Resident #16's medical record on 10/14/21 at 11:30 AM showed a care plan that addressed activities. The last care plan, revision date 2/15/2021, revealed a goal for Resident #16 to have opportunities to make decisions and choices related to/or self-directed involvement in meaningful activities. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the safety of the resident by not implementing fall precautions. This was found to be evident for 1 (resident # 92) out 3 residents reviewed for falls. The findings include: During a tour conducted on the Catoctin Nursing Unit on 10/04/21 at 7:55 am, Resident #92 was observed in a Geri chair in the day room across from the nurse's station. During the observation, LPN #3 stated the resident recently fell and was hospitalized due to a fractured hip. During an interview on 10/04/2021 at 7:57 am, Resident #92 stated s/he tried to get out of the chair and fell and broke her hip. On 10/05/2021 at 09:25 AM, record review of Resident #92's progress note, dated 09/28/2021, revealed a change of condition Brief Synopsis of Change: resident climbed out of Geri Chair while in the day room area and fell to floor on her left side, with her left arm underneath her and slightly behind her. Resident wearing grip socks at the time. Summary of Change in Condition: resident not transferred.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-15 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that a facility physician failed to include treatment orders and documentation about the continued appropriateness of the resident's current treatment regimen. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 296) of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care during the annual survey. The findings include: Medical record review on 10/06/21 at 08:25 AM revealed resident # 296 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Pneumonia due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA), Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Asthma with Acute Worsening. Hypoxia refers to a lack or low amount of oxygen in the tissues and cells of the body to maintain its normal function. During an observation on 10/06/21 at 08:55 AM, the surveyor noted resident # 296 was receiving oxygen through a nasal cannula, while lying in bed in his/her room. Oxygen therapy is the administration of oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of records and policies, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) ensure that counts of controlled substances were completed by two nurses at the change of shifts 2) that the narcotic counts were accurate for all controlled medications, 3) ensure that narcotics removed from the supply were administered to the residents as evidenced by failure to document the need for, request of, or administration to the resident, and 4) have an effective system in place to ensure regularly scheduled medications were re-ordered in a timely manner to ensure residents did not miss doses. This was found to be evident on two of the the three units in the facility and 2 out of 2 residents (Resident #350 and #367) selected for further review of narcotic control sheets during the medication storage review, and 1 out of the 4 residents (Resident #295) observed during medication pass administration. The findings include 1) Review of the facility's Controlled Substances Policy, which was provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/7/21, revealed that a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that residents were not prescribed unnecessary medication as evidenced by a physician's order for pain medication for Resident #62 that had not been administered for 4 months. This was evident for 1 (#62) of 5 Residents reviewed for pain management. The findings include: A medical record review for Resident #62 on 10/7/21 at 8:23 AM, revealed a progress note, dated 6/20/21, from the attending physician that resident had been admitted following a surgical procedure and required pain management. A review of the Medication Administration (MAR) for 5/21, revealed that on 5/21/21, an order for Oxycodone 5 mg give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain (7-10). Further review of MARs for 6/21, 7/21, 8/21, 9/21, and 10/21 revealed that the last time staff had administered this medication to Resident #62 had been 6/9/21. Also, monthly pharmacy reviews had been conducted and had not addressed this unnecessary medication. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure that a resident's medication regimen was free of unnecessary psychotropic medications as evidenced by the failure to monitor behaviors that attributed to the need for the psychotropic medication. This was evident for 1 (#40) of 12 resident reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: A medical record review for Resident #40 on 10/13/21 at 9:09 AM, revealed a History and Physical conducted by Resident #40's attending physician on 7/21/21 which had documented that Resident #40 had anxiety and Bipolar disorder. Also documented were the following medications to treat the psychiatric disorders: Aripiprazole (antipsychotic) for depression, Duloxetine (antidepressant) for depression, Lamotrigine (anti-seizure) for Bipolar disorder, and Seroquel (antipsychotic) for depression. Review of the psychiatric consult notes revealed that on 7/28/21, the nurse practitioner documented that Resident #40 experienced behavioral disturbances. Further review of the medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% as evidenced by the identification of 3 errors out of 31 opportunities for error observed during a medication pass observation. The errors were identified related to one (Resident #295) out of the four residents whose medication administrations were observed during the survey. The findings include: On 10/6/21 starting at 10:03 AM, surveyor observed nurse #16 prepare and administer Resident #295's morning medications. The nurse confirmed that three ordered medications were not available: Fludrocortisone, rivastigmine patch and Prosource. Nurse #16 also reported that she works at this facility about once per month and does not normally have problems with medications. On 10/6/21 at 11:44 AM, review of Resident #295's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in September 2021 with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to Parkinson's disease, kidney disease, and dementia. The resident had current orders for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain medical records in the most complete and accurate form. This was evident for 2 (#97, #84) of 92 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1) On 10/13/2021 at 10:39 AM a review of Resident #97's medical record revealed a nurses note from 9/7/2021 stating that the resident had decided that morning they would be leaving the facility Against Medical Advice (AMA). The note goes on to specify that Resident #97 and the writer signed a document stating the resident was leaving AMA. This document could not be found in the electronic or paper record. Interview with the Director of Nursing and Administrator on 10/15/2021 at 8:05 AM confirmed the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-15 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it had been determined that the facility failed to ensure that Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) had the required 12 hours of in-service training based on needs identified through performance evaluation and the required training subjects. This was evident for 2 (#62, and #63) of 2 staff reviewed for training requirements. The findings include: On 10/7/21 at 8:34 AM, a review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #62's employee file revealed that GNA #62 had been employed for 4 years, however, there was no evidence that the required 12 hours of in-service training had been completed. On 10/7/21 at 8:44 AM, a review of GNA #63's employee file revealed that GNA #63 had been employed for 16 years, however, there was no evidence that the required 12 hours of in-service training had been completed. An interview with the Infection Control Preventionist/Nurse Practice Educator (ICP/NPE) #1 on 10/7/21 at 12:03 PM, revealed that he/she had been working on a schedule to inservice staff, however, it had not been fully instituted at the time of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-10-15 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to document and calculate nurse staffing information daily basis, therefore had not retained these records for 18 months and failed to post nurse staffing information on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift. This was evident for 22 of 25 days reviewed for required posting information and 22 of 22 days reviewed for the posting. The findings include: On 10/7/21 at 8:33 AM, an observation of the posted nurse staffing form in the lobby revealed the form had been placed in a plastic frame and was sitting on a side table behind a lamp in a sitting area beyond the receptionist desk. Review of the posting revealed it was dated f 9/14/21 and failed to include the following information on the posting; the name of the facility, the actual hours worked by each Registered Nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse, and each Geriatric Nursing Assistant, and the resident census for the day. On 10/7/21 at 9:00 AM, a review of the nurse staffing information for 9/12/21 - 10/6/21 revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-10-15 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct and document an accurate facility-wide assessment as evidenced by the failure to provide a quantitative date regarding the amount of staff needed each shift to care for the residents, failure to include that a Registered Nurse was required 24 hours and 7 days a week, and the need for education for staff regarding Behavioral Health needs of the residents. This was evident during the review of staffing and had potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings included: A review of the Facility Assessment Tool on 10/07/21 at 12:33 PM, revealed that, in the section Staffing plan it was documented that the facility provides adequate staffing to meet residents' daily needs, preferences, and routines. However, they failed to provide a quantitative measure of adequate staffing. Furthermore, in the section staffing plan it was noted that the facility required a Registered Nurse (RN) 8 hours a day for 7 days when the requirement detailed that an RN should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$37,265 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $37,265 — penalty dated 2023-11-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Crystal SpringsElkins, WV 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glen BurnieGlen Burnie, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At HomewoodBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Long GreenBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at GreenfieldMilwaukee, WI 1 of 5Nella's At Autumn Lake HealthcareElkins, WV 2 of 5Ashbrook Care & Rehabilitation CenterScotch Plains, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Arlington WestBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Ballenger CreekFrederick, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Baltimore WashingtonGlen Burnie, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At BridgeparkBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At CatonsvilleCatonsville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Loch RavenBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At MadisonMadison, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Memorial BridgePenns Grove, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At NorwalkNorwalk, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At OverleaBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At PikesvillePikesville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RuxtonTowson, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Salem CountySalem, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At SouthgateCarneys Point, NJ 2 of 5King David Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBaltimore, MD 2 of 5The Subacute At Autumn Lake HealthcareVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Alice ManorBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Calvert ManorRising Sun, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chesapeake WoodsCambridge, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chevy ChaseChevy Chase, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Patuxent RiverLaurel, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Perring ParkwayBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RiverviewEssex, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Silver SpringSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Spa CreekAnnapolis, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Summit ParkCatonsville, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VinelandVineland, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VoorheesVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At West HartfordWest Hartford, CT 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare Post-Acute Care CenterBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at BeloitBeloit, WI 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at OceanviewOcean View, NJ 3 of 5Cornell Hall Care & Rehabilitation CenterUnion, NJ

Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
56 WEST FREDERICK HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2021
SCHWARTZ, MARKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2021
SHAH, HEMENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
WEAVER, CASSANDRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
EIDLISZ, SOLOMONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2025
GLUCK, RIVKAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2025
ACCURATE STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
BRAND SONNENSCHINE LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.4M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 23%Other / private 8%

This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$413per resident / day
operating cost
$12,564per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$433per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215313. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next