Autumn Lake Healthcare At Homewood
6000 Bellona Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21212 · For profit - Individual · 112 certified beds · (410) 323-4223 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (78) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.4% | 20.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 34.1% | 22.8% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.0% | 22.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.1% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.9% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 5.9% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.7% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.1% | 13.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.5% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 65.0% | 80.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.4% | 21.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.6% | 9.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.89 | 1.33 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.39 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 94 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 69.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.6%CMS range 39.6–56.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.8%CMS range 8.9–17.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 69.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 63.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 61.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.0%CMS range 4.6–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.48 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 90.0 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
78 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 68 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of clinical records, all pertinent facility administrative records, and interviews with the facility staff, it was determined that the facility nursing staff failed to 1) follow the physician's specific pulse and blood pressure parameters before administering cardiac medications to residents, and 2) failed to document an associated blood pressure before administering the cardiac medication. This was evident for 1 (Residents #6) of 9 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 06/10/26 at 3 pm, a review of the facility policy Medication Administration, Section 7.1, under the heading of Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: under #8, indicated the nursing staff must obtain and record vital signs, when applicable or per physician orders. When applicable, hold medication for those vital signs outside the physician's prescribed parameters. A review of Resident #6's clinical record on 06/10/26 revealed that Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the resident or representative with an outcome and/or resolution following the conclusion of a grievance investigation for 1 (R#12) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for grievances.Findings included:A review conducted on 5/14/2026 at 10:02 AM, of a facility policy titled, Resident and Family Grievances, dated 11/3/2025 revealed . Procedure: This facility will not retaliate or discriminate against anyone who files a grievance or participates in the investigation of grievance. The staff member receiving the grievance will record the nature and specifics of the grievance on the designated grievance form or assist the resident or family member to complete the form. Take any immediate action needed to prevent further potential violations of any resident rights. Report any allegations involving neglect, abuse, injuries of unknown source, and/or misappropriation of resident property immediately to the administrator and follow procedures for those…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the facility-reported incident, review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Policy, and review of the facility's investigative documentation, the facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was free from verbal and mental abuse when a staff member yelled at the resident and threatened to have a family member come to the facility to 'take care' of the resident, for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.Review conducted on 5/14/2026 at 10.15 AM. The Abuse Prevention Policy revealed that the facility policy prohibited verbal and mental abuse toward residents. The policy further indicated residents were to be free from verbal threats, intimidation, harassment, and abusive language by facility staff.Review conducted on 5/14/2026 at 10:23 AM of the facility-reported incident dated 12/24/2025 revealed that Resident #5 reported that the GNA entered the resident's room yelling and threatened to have the GNA's father come to the facility to take care of him. Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff implemented interventions to prevent a resident from falling from bed during an incontinence change for 1 of 3 sampled residents for accidents. (R#6) The findings include:R#6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified injury at C5 level of cervical spinal cord. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R#6 as cognitively intact and dependent on staff for activities of daily living. The care plan dated 4/24/2026 identified a focus related to bed mobility and indicated the resident required the assistance of one staff member to reposition and turn in bed.On 5/11/2026 at 1:56 PM review of a change in condition note dated 2/19/2026 revealed a witnessed fall. Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA3) called for assistance. Upon entering the room, the resident was observed sitting on the floor next to her bed. The Resident denied pain or discomfort and vital signs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Observation, record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors as evidenced by facility staff failing to administer medications in accordance with professional standards. This was evident for 1 (#5) of 8 resident reviewed for medication administration.The findings include:Medication is to be administered according to the five rights of medication administration: right person, right medication, right route, right dosage, and right time. On 1/9/2026 at 9AM, a review of Complaint #2695708 revealed that Resident # 5 medication was not given as prescribed by the physician.A record review of Resident # 5's medication administration audit for 12/6/25 revealed Resident # 5 had received medication that was not prescribed by the physician for a urinary track infection.On 12/6/25 at 6PM, the following medication was administered meropenem which is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibiotic used to treat severe bacterial infections instead of cefepime, a potent, broad-spectrum, fourth-generation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0777 — isolatedProvide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, facility nursing staff failed to follow a physician's order for an upper right quadrant ultrasound for a resident (Resident #6). This was evident for 1 of 7 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include:On 1/12/26, the State of Maryland's Office of Health Care Quality received a complaint which alleged the facility failed to monitor Resident #6's status and well-being during his/her stay in the facility. Review of Resident #6's medical record on 1/12/26 at 8:46 AM revealed that Resident #6's labs in 9/2025 found elevated liver enzymes. The physician ordered a right upper quadrant ultrasound on 9/18/2025. Further review of Resident #6's medical records revealed no evidence of the results from the right upper quadrant ultrasound. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 1/12/25 10:40 AM revealed that the facility's nursing staff failed to complete the physician ordered right upper quadrant ultrasound. The surveyor explained that this is a concern due to failure to follow a physician's order.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of employee records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) conduct annual performance reviews of Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) and 2) provide regular, in-service education based on the outcome of those individual performance reviews. This was evident for 5 (GNA #49, GNA #50, GNA #1, GNA #51, GNA #52) of 5 randomly selected GNAs' records reviewed during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include:Performance reviews are to be completed for every GNA at least every 12 months to identify specific in-service education based on the outcome of those individual performance reviews. On 7/22/25 at 9:15 AM in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) when asked who conducted performance reviews for the GNAs and nurses, she stated the Unit Managers. When asked where they were stored, she stated, We were in the process of getting them done when you came in. Additionally, she stated, From my understanding, they have not been done for quite some time. On 7/22/25 at 1:02 PM, a review of 5 GNAs' randomly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to hold care plan meetings to include the interdisciplinary team, resident and resident's representative for residents. This was evident for 5 (Resident #1, #4, #9, #67, and #75) of 64 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Once the facility staff completes an in-depth assessment (MDS) of the resident, the interdisciplinary team meet and develop care plans. Care plans provide direction for individualized care of the resident. A care plan flows from each resident's unique list of diagnoses and should be organized by the resident's specific needs. The care plan is a means of communicating and organizing the actions and assure the resident's needs are attended to. The care plan is to be reviewed and revised at each assessment time of the resident to ensure the interventions on the care plan is accurate and appropriate for the resident. Care plan meetings are held each quarter and as needed. 1)On 7/16/25 at 1:23 PM a review of Resident #67’s medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to 1) ensure that fall precautions were in place, per the physician's orders, for a resident with a history of falls from the bed, 2) follow the resident's smoking plan of care, and 3) provide supervision for residents requiring supervision while smoking. This was evident for 4 (Resident #4, #1, #83, and #97) of 64 residents reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: 1)On 7/16/25 at 11:15 AM Resident #4’s medical record was reviewed and revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, symptoms and signs involving cognitive function following cerebral infarction, osteoarthritis of the right knee, and bipolar disorder. A 6/11/25 at 19:30 (7:30 PM) change in condition note documented Resident #4 had an unwitnessed fall from the fall from the bed. There were no visible injuries noted other than a skin tear on the right forearm. A 6/24/25 at 4:05 AM change in condition note documented Resident #4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of complaints, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to 1) provide timely medication to meet the needs of the residents, and 2) ensure that narcotic medications were consistently reconciled by two nurses at change of shift. This was evident for 3 (#67, #108, #111) of 64 residents reviewed, and 4 halls ([NAME], [NAME], [NAME], and [NAME]) of 4 halls of narcotic and controlled substance log binders reviewed for accuracy and completeness of controlled medication storage and documentation during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings included: Narcotic (controlled) medication, due to its potential for abuse and addiction, is required to be thoroughly tracked and accounted for by the facility. This includes but is not limited to an accounting of all narcotics in storage whenever a change of shift among nursing staff occurs. This medication count must be performed by two nursing staff at the same time to verify the counts being conducted. Any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 68 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a tour of the kitchen, staff interview and observation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) ensure proper disposal of foods no longer safe to consume, and 2) store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was evident for 2 out of 3 kitchen tours and observation of a nourishment room during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1)During the initial tour of the kitchen on 7/15/25 at 7:34 AM these items were found in the walk-in cooler: 4 - 4 packs of yogurt (2 strawberry yogurt cups and 2 vanilla yogurt cups per pack), 2 loose containers of strawberry yogurt, and 1 loose container of vanilla yogurt that had best by dates of 7/2/25. The Dietary Manager (Staff #53) was interviewed on 7/15/25 at 7:40 AM. This surveyor showed her the yogurts and their dates. She replied by saying that they needed to be thrown out. She then took the items off of the shelf to be discarded. During a tour of the kitchen on 7/22/25 at 8:10 AM this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a complaint, observation of resident rooms, common shared areas, interviews, and documentation review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1)follow infection control practices and guidelines to prevent the development and transmission of infection and disease, 2) ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for enhanced barrier precautions during medication administration to resident with a Gastrostomy tube and post appropriate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) signage, 3) place order for contact precaution and care plan for a resident with an infectious disease, 4) place precaution order and signage on the door for EBP residents. This was evident on 3 of 3 hallways observed, 5 (Residents #11, #128, #12, #27, and #44) of 7 residents reviewed for Infection Control during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: TBP definitions: Transmission Based Precautions (TBPS) (a set of infection control measures used in addition to standard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation during the initial tour of the facility and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident had the call bell control by their side. This was evident for 2 (Resident #9 and #43) out of the 64 residents in the survey sample. The findings include: 1)During the initial tour of the facility on 07/15/2025 8:33 AM this surveyor entered Resident #43's room and observed that the call bell cord and plunger were on the floor to the right of the bed near the headboard and out of reach of the resident. The resident was unaware of the call bell's location. 2)On 07/15/2025 at 9:35 AM during the surveyor’s initial tour of the facility, an observation of Resident #9’s call bell (an item used to press and alert staff that a resident needed assistance) was on the floor and out of reach of the resident. On 07/15/2025 at 09:40 AM during an interview with staff #20 a Geriatric Nursing Assistant/Certified Medication Tech (GNA/CMA) stated the call light should be within reach and verified that Resident #9’s call light was not within reach. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Resident Council meeting minutes and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to demonstrate their response and rationale for concerns identified by the Resident Council. This was found to be evident based on review of 4 months of Resident Council meeting minutes.The findings include:The Resident Council is a group of residents that meets regularly on the behalf of all residents in the facility to discuss concerns about facility policies and procedures affecting residents' care, treatment, and quality of life. Facility staff are required to consider resident and family group views and act upon grievances and recommendations. This may include developing or changing policies affecting resident care and life. Facility staff should discuss their decisions with the resident and/or family group and document in writing its response and rationale. The facility must be able to demonstrate their response and rationale. On 7/21/2025 at 8:29 AM a review of the most recent 4 months' Resident Council meeting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 1) a baseline care plan was completed and 2) a summary, including a current list of medications, was provided to the resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #101) out of 3 closed records reviewed during the facility's recertification survey.The findings include:A baseline care plan (BLCP) must be completed within 48 hours of a resident's admission to the facility and include the initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, and social services. A summary of the BLCP and current medication list must be given to each resident and/or his/her representative. Completion and implementation of the BLCP is intended to promote continuity of care and communication among staff, increase resident safety, and safeguard against adverse events (undesirable outcomes) that can occur right after admission. On 7/23/25 at 11:41 AM review of Resident #101's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address a resident's catheter use. This was evident for 1 (Resident #80) out 64 residents that were part of the survey sample. The findings include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. The information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. A review of Resident #80's clinical record on 7/22/25 at 9:00 AM revealed that the resident's primary physician ordered on 3/11/25 that the resident have an indwelling urinary catheter. The Resident's Admissions MDS was completed on 3/16/25. It had a Care Area Assessment (CAA) that noted the Interdisciplinary team (IDT) agreed to complete a care plan to address the ordered catheter. The Quarterly MDS completed on 5/3/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of resident medical records and interviews with facility staff, the facility failed to 1) address a significant weight loss, and 2) follow the recommendations of the Dietitian for a resident. This deficiency was evident in 2 (Resident #9 and #116) of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition during this recertification/complaint survey. Findings included: 1)During a review of Resident #9's medical record on 07/16/25 at 11:52 AM, it was revealed that the resident was readmitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. The resident's body weight was documented as: 06/02/25: 170.2 lbs (via Hoyer lift) 07/09/25: 158 lbs (via Hoyer lift, a loss of 12.2 lbs, 7.17%) 07/15/25: 163 lbs (via Hoyer lift) Further review of Resident #9's medical records showed that their nutrition evaluation was documented on 06/03/25. However, there was no additional evaluation regarding this significant weight loss. In an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 on 07/16/25 at 12:55 PM, she stated that the Geriatric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and medical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide respiratory care to meet the needs of residents. This was evidenced by: absence of physician orders indicating the use of oxygen for residents, failure to maintain nasal cannulas in a sanitary manner, and failure to administer oxygen according to the prescribed settings. This was evident for three residents (#1, #3, and #13) reviewed for respiratory care during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:1) Review of Resident #13’s medical record on 7/17/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include chronic respiratory failure and obstructive sleep apnea. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder where breathing repeatedly stops and starts during sleep due to a blockage of the airway. BiPAP, or bilevel positive airway pressure, is a type of non-invasive ventilation used to assist breathing, particularly for individuals with sleep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) properly assess for pain, 2) have parameters for pain medications used for pain management, 3) provide nonpharmacological intervention for a resident's reported pain, 4) received PRN (as needed) pain medication according to the Physician order set parameters (a specific instruction given for administration of medication), and 5) failed to administer a scheduled pain medication according to a Physician order. This was evident for 2 (Resident #1 and # 2) out of 2 residents reviewed for pain during this recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: Oxycodone is a strong short acting prescription pain medication classified as an opioid, used to manage moderate to severe pain. Oxycontin is a long-acting pain medication classified as an opioid that is specifically formulated as a controlled-release tablet designed to deliver oxycodone over a 12-hour period, providing sustained pain relief for chronic or constant pain that requires around-the-clock pain management. 1)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the nursing staff failed to monitor behavior of a resident. This was evident for 3 (Resident #3, #6, and #45) out of 64 residents assessed for behavior monitoring during this recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:1)The surveyor conducted an initial interview with Resident #3 on 7/15/25 at 10:35 AM. During the interview the resident became tearful, expressing sadness stating a family member had passed away a few weeks ago. On 07/21/2025 at 10:40 AM in review of Resident #3’s medical record revealed the following physician orders dated 05/05/2025: Bupropion HCI ER oral tablet Extended Release 24-hour 300 MG (Bupropion HCI) give one tablet by mouth one time a day for depression. Sertraline HCI Oral tablet 100 MG give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Depression. Trazadone HCI Oral Tablet 50 MG give 25 MG by mouth at bedtime for Depression. Continued review of Resident # 3's medical record revealed that there was a care plan dated 05/06/2025 for use of antidepressant medication related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure medications were held according to the physician orders. This was evident for 1 (Resident #43) out of 64 residents in the survey sample. The findings include: A review of Resident #43's clinical record revealed that the resident had an order for Midodrine 5mg three times a day for orthostatic hypotension and to hold if systolic (top number) blood pressure is above 130. A review of the July Medication Administration Record revealed that on 7/2/25 at 6:30 AM the blood pressure was 132/74, but the medication was still given. A review of the June Medication Administration Record revealed that on 6/2/25 at 6:30 AM the resident had a blood pressure of 132/75, but the medication was still given. On 6/8/25 at 11:30 AM the resident had a blood pressure of 136/72, but the medication was still given. On 6/15/25 at 6:30 AM the resident had a blood pressure of 136/70, but the medication was still given. On 6/16/25 at 11:30 AM the resident had a blood pressure of 134/68, but the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, documentation review, and interview with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) properly store medication by leaving a narcotic medication on the bedside table in the resident's room, and 2) keep treatment carts locked when unattended and discard medications/biologicals when expired. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 40) of 29 residents bedroom areas observed, and 1 of 3 nursing units observed during random observations made during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On [DATE] at 09:40, Resident #40 informed the surveyor that his/her medication was left on his/her bedside table. The surveyor observed a small bottle of medication labeled Methadone 115mg on the resident’s bedside table. An interview was conducted on [DATE] at 09:43 with Staff # 12 who stated that s/he was administering medication and resident was getting care and she left the medication on his/her bedside table. Staff #12 stated that it was not the right thing to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to arrange for dental services within a reasonable time frame following the dental consultant recommendation. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents (#45) selected for dental complaints during this recertification/complaint survey process.The findings include:On 07/15/2025 at 12:20 PM Resident #45's Son stated that the resident often complained of tooth pain. The son stated that the resident had a dental consultation, but there had been no follow up. An interview was conducted with the resident on 07/16/2025 at 10:06 AM and when asked if the resident had dental pain, the resident showed surveyor his/her teeth and stated, I have no teeth on top, or bottom and it hurts when I eat. The surveyor observed resident missing teeth to top and bottom of mouth with 2 side teeth on the top of the mouth.A review of the resident's care plan on 7/16/25 at 12:02 PM revealed that the resident had oral/dental health problems as evidenced by broken teeth/likely cavity. Date Initiated: 07/22/2022…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure timely updates to the residents' hospice status. This was evident for 1 (Resident #9) of 2 residents reviewed for hospice care during this recertification/complaint survey. Finding includes: During a review of Resident #9's medical record on 07/16/25, at 2:32 PM, it was revealed that a document from a contracted company in their hard copy chart indicated hospice care began on 03/29/25 and was discharged on 05/29/25.However, a review of Resident #9's care plan on 07/17/25, around 9:00 AM, showed an active care plan for hospice care. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Section O (Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs), dated 06/20/25, also indicated the resident was in hospice care.Additionally, during an interview with Staff #10 (Rehab Director) on 07/17/25, at 11:36 AM, they stated that the resident was not evaluated for a rehabilitation program due to being under hospice care.In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 07/16/25 at 2:50 PM, she confirmed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide education regarding the risks versus benefits of the pneumonia vaccine. This was evident for 2 out of 5 residents (Resident #1 and #5) whose immunization records were reviewed during this recertification/complaint survey. Finding included: Pneumococcal vaccine help prevents pneumococcal disease, which is any type of illness caused by streptococcus pneumonia bacteria. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends a pneumococcal vaccine for age [AGE] years or older and adults 19 through [AGE] years old with certain medical conditions or risk factors. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention- vaccines and preventable disease) On July 22, 2025, at 8:46 AM, immunization records for five randomly selected residents were reviewed. The immunization tab in the electronic medical record documented that both Resident #1 and Resident #5 refused the pneumonia vaccine. However, there was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' COVID-19 vaccination status was properly monitored. This was evident for one (Resident #5) of five residents whose COVID-19 vaccination records were reviewed during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: A COVID-19 vaccine is designed to provide acquired immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease. On July 22, 2025, at 8:46 AM, immunization records for five randomly selected residents were reviewed. Resident #5, who was admitted in July 2024, this resident had no evidence of COVID-19 vaccination, neither historical data nor an offer from the facility. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 7/22/2025, at 1:26 PM, she stated that the Infection Preventionist typically monitors residents' vaccination status (e.g., Pneumonia, Flu, and COVID-19) upon admission. When informed there was no information for Resident #5's COVID-19 vaccination status, the DON validated the concern.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. This was evident on 2 of 3 nursing units observed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:The following environmental concerns were observed during the initial entrance rounds in the facility on 7/15/25 at 7:45 AM and throughout the survey until 7/25/24.room [ROOM NUMBER] - in the bathroom there were 4 ceiling tiles with brown stains/water marks.room [ROOM NUMBER] - there was no toilet paperroom [ROOM NUMBER]A - the laminate was peeling on the headboard and footboard of the bed. There was peeling paint on the entire front edge of the window sill down to the bare wood. There was no string for the over-the-bed light.room [ROOM NUMBER] - The frame on the over the toilet riser was rusted in the front and on the legs room [ROOM NUMBER] - There was approximately 3 feet of molding by the window…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility reported incidents, record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of abuse within 2 hours of the allegation and misappropriation of property within 24 hours to the regulatory agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This was evident for 8 (#120, #107, #117, #67, #81, #103, #104, #122) residents reviewed for 21 facility reported incidents during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 7/16/25 at 8:23 AM a review of facility reported incident 326126 was conducted and revealed Resident #120 alleged that on 3/21/23 at 12:30 PM the phlebotomist came to draw the resident’s blood while the resident was in the middle of prayer. The resident alleged the phlebotomist punched him/her in the chest and wrestled his/her arms and said, “listen to me. Review of the facility’s investigation failed to produce an email confirmation as to when the initial report was submitted to OHCQ. Review of the Comprehensive and Extended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility reported incidents, medical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide documentation that allegations of abuse and misappropriation of property were thoroughly investigated. This was evident for 7 (#120, #127, #117, #101, #81, #103, #126) of 21 residents reviewed for facility reported incidents during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 7/16/25 at 8:23 AM a review of facility reported incident 326126 was conducted and revealed Resident #120 alleged that on 3/21/23 at 12:30 PM the phlebotomist came to draw the resident’s blood while the resident was in the middle of prayer. The resident alleged the phlebotomist punched him/her in the chest and wrestled his/her arms and said, “listen to me.” Review of Resident #120’s medical record revealed a 3/24/23 change in condition note that documented the resident filed a grievance related to the incident. Review of the facility’s investigation revealed (13) staff interviews and an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for residents (Resident #40, # 75, #106 and #113). This was evident for 4 of 64 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:1.The facility staff failed to follow the nurse practitioner's instructions for Resident #40. Review of Resident #40's medical record on 7/22/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with a diagnosis to include hypertension. Hypertension (high blood pressure) is when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high. a) Further review of Resident #40's medical record revealed the Resident was seen by the Nurse Practitioner (NP) (Staff #47) on 7/7/25. Review of the NP's 7/7/25 note revealed the Resident was seen for a follow-up lab review. The NP documented the Resident continues on Lasix 20 mg daily for bilateral lower extremity edema and to monitor weights…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of restrooms for residents and visitors, a nursing station, a public shower room, and facility staff offices, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, visitors, and staff as identified. This was evident in 2 staff bathrooms observed on 2 nursing units, 2 of 2 shower rooms, and 2 staff offices observed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:On 7/15/25 at 9:03 AM observation was made in the Human Resources Director's (HR) office of black specs which appeared to be a moldlike substance on the window blinds and covering the slats of the air conditioning unit which also had condensation around the unit. An interview was conducted with Staff #5 who confirmed there was mold growing in the office and that she had reported it to administration. On 7/24/25 at 9:00 AM and 10:20 AM observation was made of the bathroom in the [NAME] unit nurse's station. The base molding was pulled away from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify a resident's representative (Resident #13 and #110) and a resident's physician (Resident #13) for a change in condition. This was evident for 2 of 64 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:1.The facility staff failed to notify Resident #13's representative and physician on 6/10/25 when the Resident's BiPAP machine stopped working. BiPAP, or bilevel positive airway pressure, is a type of non-invasive ventilation used to assist breathing, particularly for individuals with sleep apnea or other respiratory conditions. A review of a complaint was conducted on 7/17/25 regarding the Resident's representative (RP) was not notified when the Resident's BiPAP stopped working on 6/10/25. Review of Resident #13's medical record on 7/17/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include chronic respiratory failure and obstructive sleep apnea. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder where breathing repeatedly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of facility documentation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to protect a resident from verbal abuse from facility staff (Resident #104). This was evident for 1 of 64 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: On 7/16/25 a review of facility reported incident 326163 was conducted. The facility reported on 10/3/24 at approximately 6:46 PM, Staff #55 and #56 were providing care to Resident #104. Resident #104 was screaming in pain and stated I am dying, I have cancer. Staff #55 reportedly told Resident #104 well go ahead and die then so you can stop all this screaming. Review of Resident #104's medical record on 7/16/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with a diagnosis to include malignant neoplasm of the bone (bone cancer). Review of the facility's investigation revealed a statement from the Resident's family member to the Administrator stating at the time of the incident he/she was on the phone with the Resident and heard Staff #55 say to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a facility reported incident, medical records, controlled drug sheets, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of narcotics. This was evident for 1 (#81) of 22 residents reviewed for facility reported incidents during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 7/18/25 at 6:49 AM a review of facility reported incident 326170 was conducted and it was alleged that narcotic medication was missing from Resident #81 on 5/13/25 at the end of the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift. A review of Resident #81's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, unilateral primary osteoarthritis of the left knee, pain in the left ankle and joints of the left ankle, low back pain, other polyneuropathies, chronic pain syndrome, and spinal stenosis of the cervical and lumbar region. The resident had an order for the (Opioid) Oxycodone 5 mg to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 3 (#127, #111, #108) of 64 residents reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) On 7/16/25 at 9:33 AM a review of Resident #127's medical record was conducted. Resident #127 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses that included polyneuropathy, chronic pain, generalized osteoarthritis and gout.Review of Resident #127's September 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented that the resident received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 3 (Resident #67, #75, and #108) of 64 residents reviewed during an recertification/complaint survey. The findings include. A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1) Review of Resident #75’s medical record revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in July 2024 and after a hospitalization was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #75’s hospital discharge summary on 5/23/25 stated Patient was subsequently discharged in stable condition. All non-essential medications from a palliative standpoint were discontinued. Further review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations for 1.) Resident #40 as evidenced by failing to have a language line communication system. The Language Line allows the Service Provider to access a translator by phone to communicate with people who speak a language other than English and 2). failed to ensure call bells were within reach of the Residents (#25 and #26). This was evident for 3 (Residents #40, #25 and #26) out of 66 residents reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a standardized, primary screening and assessment tool of health status which forms the foundation of the comprehensive assessment for all residents of long-term care facilities certified to participate in Medicare or Medicaid. The MDS contains items that measure physical, psychological, and psycho-social functioning. The items in the MDS give a multidimensional view of the patient's functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-21 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Resident Council meeting minutes and interview with members of the resident council it was determined that the facility staff failed to consistently update the residents with responses to their concerns. This was evident for 6 out of the 18 months reviewed. The findings include: Members of the resident were interviewed on 9/15/22 at 1:30 PM. During the interview the residents said that they make complaints to staff that attend the resident council meetings but they don't have an answer. When I asked if staff provide a response the following month. The residents responded, they never come back with an answer. A review of the resident council meeting notes revealed the following: The minutes for the 2/23/22 Resident Council meeting mention that the residents brought up concerns of restrooms not being cleaned, weekend housekeeping staff just taking out trash, and the courtyard not being cleaned with overflowing trash cans. The minutes for the 3/23/22 Resident Council meeting mention the housekeeping concerns from the February minutes as old business. New business…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that Advanced Directives were offered and/or available in the clinical record for 5 out of the 66 residents reviewed as part of the survey sample (Residents #16, #32, #41, #42, and #43). The findings include: A review of the facility's policies and procedures for Advanced Directives revealed: On admission, the facility will determine if the resident has executed an advanced directive, and if not, determine whether the resident would like to formulate an advance directive. Upon admission, should the resident have an advanced directive, copies will be made and placed on the chart as well as communicated to the staff. 1. A review of Resident #16's clinical record on 9/6/22 at 11:18 AM revealed that there was no note stating that the resident was informed of the right to formulate an Advanced Directive nor was there a copy of an Advanced Directive. Resident #16 was interviewed on 9/9/22 at 10:06 AM. The resident could not remember if an Advanced Directives were discussed at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents' rooms were maintained in a homelike environment by failing to conduct routine assessments of the resident room and completing repairs when needed. This was found to be evident while touring the facility during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. Findings include: A tour of the facility on 09/07/22 at 8:35 AM revealed multiple areas that needed to be repaired/maintained: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] had 3 large bags of clothes sitting on the floor, flies in the room, and smashed grapes on the floor. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s dry wall was in various stages of disrepair. Clothes and supplies were piled high on chairs making the chair unusable for residents or visitors. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a pile of clean towels and gowns folded and on the floor. The Ceiling tile above bed was observed with brown and dark black patches, wound vac medical equipment packets were observed on the floor, over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-21 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined the facility staff failed to provide written notice for emergency transfers to the resident's responsible party and/or the Ombudsman. This was found to be evident for 5 out of 66 (Resident #27, #75, #14, #12 and #47) residents reviewed for a facility-initiated transfer during the investigation of the survey. The findings include: 1. On 9/7/22 at 8:30 AM a review of Resident #27's clinical record revealed that in April 2022, the resident was sent to the hospital for treatment and evaluation. The review also revealed that the facility staff failed to provide written notice for emergency transfers to the Ombudsman. 2. On 9/7/22 at 11 AM a review of Resident #14's clinical record revealed that in January 2022, the resident was sent to the hospital for treatment and evaluation. The review also revealed that the facility staff failed to provide written notice for emergency transfers to the Ombudsman. 3. On 9/7/22 at 9:30 AM a review of Resident #75's clinical record revealed that in July 2022, the resident was sent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-21 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a copy of the facility bed hold policy was provided to the resident's responsible party. This was evident for 2 (#12 and #47) out of the 66 residents in the survey sample. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #12's medical record on 9/8/22 revealed the Resident was transferred from the facility to the hospital in August 2022. Further review of the resident's medical record failed to reveal any documentation that a written notice regarding the bed hold policy had been provided to the resident's responsible party. Interview with Director of Nursing and Administrator on 9/13/22 at 8:00 AM confirmed the facility had no evidence Resident #12's responsible party had been given written notification of the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer. 2. Review of Resident #47's medical record on 9/8/22 revealed the Resident was transferred from the facility to the hospital in July 2022. Further review of the resident's medical record failed to reveal any documentation that a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure care plan meetings were held, failed to update care plans for residents and failed to ensure the full interdisciplinary team including residents and/or their responsible parties were invited to the quarterly care plan meetings. This was evident for 5 (Resident #2, #16, #41, #7, and #27) out of 66 residents in the survey sample. The findings are: A comprehensive care plan is an outline of nursing care showing all the resident's needs and the ways of meeting those needs. It is a dynamic document initiated at admission and subject to continuous reassessment and change by the nursing staff caring for the resident. The care plan includes nursing and medical diagnoses, nursing interventions, and outcomes to ensure consistency of care. 1. Resident #2 was interviewed on 9/7/22 at 8:28 AM. The resident was uncertain if a care plan meeting has been held. A review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed that the last care meeting was held on 4/15/21. A progress note dated 12/28/2021…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The Findings: On 09/06/22 at 9:19 AM during the initial facility tour and observation of the facility kitchen with the Dietary Manager, it was found that: 1. The pipes behind the stove had a build-up of grease and grease-laden dust hanging from the pipes. 2. The wall above the double sink had 2 large holes. 3. The kitchen walls had chipping paint. 4. The kitchen walls were missing random baseboard tiles and had holes in the baseboard where the tiles used to be. 5. Standing water on the floor near the dishwasher. 6. The drain traps had paper, food particles, and flies. 7. A rusted cast iron pan was noted on the shelf. 8. The knife holder had a build-up of grease and dust on the top with the knives in place in the holder. 9. A scoop was on lying inside the oat cereal container. 10. The cereal was marked with an expiration date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a cord used to turn on/off a call light was in working condition to allow the residents a means of directly contacting staff. This was evident for 5 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 17, 41, 56, and Resident #27's room) toured as part of the annual survey. The findings include: 1. On 09/07/22 at 8:15 AM, an interview with Resident #27 revealed that she/he had no way of contacting the nurse and that her call bell was broken for a week. The Resident made staff aware of the broken call light and the Resident stated that she/he needs staff assistance for turning in bed. Observation of the called light cord revealed it was attached to an outlet on the wall, but the end of the cord was frayed, and the push button was missing from the cord. On 9/7/22 at 10:18 AM the Administrator and DON were made aware. 2. The call bell cord for room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed on 9/8/22 at 8:44 AM to have one end plugged into the wall plate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the physician of a resident's abnormal radiology results in a timely manner (Resident #47). This was evident for 1 of 66 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #47's medical record on 9/12/22 revealed the Resident had a fall at the facility on 7/4/22. On 7/4/22 the facility obtained a left hip X-ray that showed no fracture. On 7/6/22 the Resident was seen and assessed by Physician #1 who documented, Unwitnessed fall with left hip pain: First X-ray negative but having persistent pain and exam significant for high possibility of left hip fracture. Repeat X-ray pending. Further review of Resident #47's medical record revealed on 7/6/22 at 1:39 PM the X-ray was completed and reported at 5:00 PM. The Radiology Results Report stated, There is an acute intertrochanteric fracture. Further review of the Resident's record revealed the facility staff did not notify Physician Assistant #1 of the Resident's abnormal X-ray results until 7/7/22 at 10:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's investigation of a facility reported incident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to protect a resident from abuse. (Resident #41). This was evident for 1 out of 17 residents selected for review for abuse during the annual survey process. The findings include: A review of the facility's investigation revealed that on 6/5/22 Resident #41 reported Nurse #5 gave him/her the middle finger and it was witnessed by Nurse #2. During interview with Resident #41 on 9/15/22 at 8:30 AM, he/she stated he/she was going to visit Resident #45 when Nurse #5 told him/her that he/she was not allowed in the room and he/she was a creep. Resident #41 stated he/she went to tell Nurse #2 and Nurse #5 told him/her why don't you tell your mother and the [NAME]. Resident #41 stated he/she said to Nurse #5 why do you have to be such a bitch and Nurse #5 stated your mom is a bitch and gave Resident #41 the middle finger. During the interview, Resident #41 stated he/she was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility statements, it was determined the facility staff failed to report an incident of alleged abuse to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) and local law enforcement as required (Resident #186). This was evident for 1 out of 17 residents reviewed for abuse during an annual survey. The findings include: During investigation of an anonymous complaint, it was reported the facility staff failed to report an allegation of alleged abuse regarding an unknown geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) and Resident #186. Review of the facility investigation revealed that on 3/25/22 Resident #191 reported to Social Worker #2 that last Saturday or the Saturday before he/she heard Resident #186 yelling and moaning. Resident #191 stated could not see anything but heard an unknown GNA changing and yelling at Resident #186. Resident #191 then stated he/she heard a sound that sounded like a slap, the sound a glove makes against the skin. Further review of the facility investigation revealed although the facility investigated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to accurately code the resident's status on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (Resident #7 and #23). This was evident for 2 out of 66 residents selected for review during an annual survey. The findings include: The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. 1. Observation of Resident #7 on 9/7/22 at 11:30 AM revealed the Resident had a Foley catheter. Review of Resident #7's medical record on 9/8/22 revealed the Resident was readmitted to the facility from the hospital on 3/28/22. Review of the resident's physician's orders revealed an order for Foley catheter care on 3/28/22. A Foley catheter is a thin, flexible tube placed in your bladder to drain your…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide the resident or resident representative with a summary of their baseline care plan upon admission. This was evident for 1 of 6 (Resident #27) residents reviewed during the complaint investigations. The findings include: A baseline care plan must be prepared for all residents within 48 hours of a resident's admission. Its purpose is to provide the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident until a comprehensive care plan can be completed for the resident. The baseline care plan, along with a copy of their medications, is given to the resident and details a variety of components of the care that the facility intends to provide to that resident. This allows residents and their representatives to be more informed about the care that they receive. On 9/9/22 at 9 AM, a review of Resident #27's medical record revealed documentation that Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to develop comprehensive care plans for residents (Resident #38 and #32). This was evident for 2 out of 66 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: A care plan is an outline of nursing care showing all the resident's needs and the ways of meeting the needs. Care plans provide direction for individualized care of the resident. A care plan flows from each resident's unique list of diagnoses and should be organized by the individual's specific needs. It is a dynamic document initiated at admission and subject to continuous reassessment and change by the nursing staff caring for the resident. The care plan typically includes nursing and medical diagnoses, nursing interventions, and outcomes to ensure consistency of care. 1. The facility staff failed to develop a care plan addressing Resident #38's need for oxygen therapy. Observation of Resident #38 on 9/6/22 at 1:49 PM revealed the resident was wearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to document or assess the care for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line in accordance with generally accepted standards of nursing practice for Resident #235. This was evident in 1 of 66 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings included: A peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is a long, thin tube that is advanced into the body in the veins until the internal tip of the catheter is in the superior vena cava. The PICC insertion procedure is to provide medicinal therapy and fluids through an intravenous catheter. On 9/20/22 at 11 AM an investigation of complaint MD00175761 revealed that Resident #235 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for IV antibiotic treatment through his/her PICC line. A further record review revealed that the facility staff failed to document or assess the sight for infection and verify that the PICC line was functional by using flushes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders in the care of a resident (Resident #187). This was evident for 1 out of 66 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #187's medical record on 9/15/22 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with diagnosis to include right hip open wound. Further review of the resident's medical record revealed on 7/2/22 at 9:15 AM, the facility staff documented a Change of Condition Note that stated, resident received methadone 120 mg in error. Methadone is a narcotic medication that is used to treat moderate to severe pain. It can also treat narcotic drug addiction. Review of the resident's physician orders revealed the resident was not ordered Methadone. Further review of the Change of Condition Note on 7/2/22 at 9:15 AM revealed the facility staff documented, resident received methadone 120 mg in error, receive every 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures ulcers for a resident (Resident #7). This is evident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during an annual survey. The findings include: A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore, or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according the their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II ( superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III ( full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and/or eschar in the wound bed). Review of Resident #7's medical record on 9/8/22 revealed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident's environment was reasonably free of hazards (Resident #20 and # 133). This was evident for 2 of 66 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: 1. An observation was made of the Resident #20's room on 9/06/22 at 10:49 AM, 9/07/22 at 9:50 AM, and 9/8/22 at 8:50 AM and revealed the television that was present in the room with the legs attached was resting on top of a box on the nightstand. The TV was bigger than the nightstand's top surface therefore a box was sitting on the nightstand and the TV was on top of the unsecured box surface. The administration was made aware of the concerns on 9/8/22 at 9:30 AM. 2. A review of Resident #133's clinical record on 9/20/22 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] during the evening shift. The resident had orders to be fed by tube feeding alone and nothing by mouth. Further record review revealed that on 4/16/21 at 10:50 AM the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to thoroughly assess the need for pain medication and medicate Resident #63. This was evident for 1 of 66 residents selected for review of pain assessment during the annual survey. The findings include: Pain is often regarded as the fifth vital sign in healthcare because it is accepted now in healthcare that pain, like other vital signs, is an objective sensation rather than a subjective one. As a result, nurses are trained and expected to assess pain. A component of pain assessment-focusing on words to describe pain, intensity, location, duration, and aggravating or alleviating factors. It is the expectation the facility staff assesses pain prior to and after the administration of pain medication to determine the need for the medication and its effectiveness of the medication. The pain scale is a numerical scale from 0 to 10. Number 0 means no pain; one to three means mild pain; four to six is considered moderate pain; seven and above is severe pain. A medical record review for Resident #63…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The findings include: 1. On 12/04/2018 at 11:01 AM room [ROOM NUMBER]A was observed to have cracked drywall beside the window as well as chipped and peeling paint on the window and walls. 2. On 12/04/2018 at 11:13 AM the acrylic glass covering the light over the bed of room [ROOM NUMBER]C was observed to be loose and hanging off the fixture. 3. On 12/04/2018 at 11:32 AM the wall outside room [ROOM NUMBER]B had a fist sized hole in it. 4. On 12/06/2018 at 11:04 AM the floor in room [ROOM NUMBER]A was observed to be soiled and sticky in the area between the bed and window. These findings were confirmed with Maintenance and the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/10/2018. 5. The tour of the nursing facility with the Maintenance Director and Administrator on 12/11/18, revealed the following: --Shower valves for some shower stalls within both nursing care units were found…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-12-11 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of employee files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to perform annual performance reviews for 3 of 5 employee staff members reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Employee #15's employee and education records revealed Employee #15's last performance evaluation was conducted on 07/14/2017. 2) Review of Employee #16's employee and education records revealed Employee #16's last performance evaluation was conducted on 05/25/2017. 3) Review of Employee #18's employee and education records revealed GNA #18's last performance evaluation could not be located by the facility administrative staff. In an interview with the facility staff development and educator on 12/11/18 at 11:15 AM, the facility staff development and educator confirmed that the facility had not conducted a yearly performance evaluation for Employee's #15, #16 and #18.
- Potential for harm · E2018-12-11 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. The findings include: An observation of the facility's dumpster/trash disposal area was conducted on 12/07/2018 at approximately 10:00 AM. A mattress and chair cushions were observed on the ground beside the dumpsters. Both dumpster lids and side doors were observed to be open. Discarded cardboard, boxes, drink cups and plastic trash were scattered on the ground around the dumpster area. Proper disposal of garbage and refuse maintains facility cleanliness and reduces the risk of pests. The findings were confirmed via walk through of the dumpster area and interview with the Director of Maintenance on 12/07/2018.
- Potential for harm · E2018-12-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition. The findings include: 1. On 12/06/2018 at 10:16 AM a blue bariatric wheelchair was observed against the wall in Resident #2's room. The arms of the wheelchair were in disrepair with a worn and cracked plastic covering over the arm rests. The front of the armrests were observed wrapped in gauze and covered in clear tape. The back of the armrests were ripped exposing the cushioning underneath. Based on an interview with Resident #2 at 10:17 AM it was confirmed that the resident used the chair daily. Interview with the Maintenance Director at 10:18 AM confirmed that Resident #2 used this chair to sit in the hall. 2. A review of the facility's maintenance records for their Hoyer Lifts was conducted on 12/10/2018. A Hoyer Lift is a mechanical device used by nursing staff to lift and transfer residents. Review of the inspection record revealed that the next inspection was due in June 2019.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2018-12-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of employee files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the nurses' aides had continuing education of no less than 12 hours per year. This was evident for 3 of 5 employees' educational records reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Employee #15's employee and education records revealed Employee #15 only received 8 hours and 20 minutes worth of continuing education through the last year. 2) Review of Employee #17's employee and education records revealed Employee #17 only received 4 hours and 30 minutes worth of continuing education through the past year. 3) Review of Employee #18's employee and education records revealed Employee #18 only received 4 hours and 15 minutes worth of continuing education through the past year. In an interview with the facility staff development and educator on 12/11/18 at 11:15 AM, the facility staff development and educator confirmed that Employee's #15, #17 and #18 had only received those amounts of continuing education through the last year and that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure that call bells were within reach. This was evident for 1 out of 29 residents (Resident #46). This was evident during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: During surveyor observation of Resident #46 on 12/06/18 at 8:20 AM, 9:45 AM and 12 PM the resident was observed in bed, however, the facility staff failed to place the call light within the resident's reach. The call light on all three observations was on the floor at the right-sided of the bed. On 12/07/18 at 1:00 PM, an interview with the Director of Nursing confirmed the facility staff failed to provide Resident #46 with a call lights in reach.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-11 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, document review, resident interview and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure survey results were posted in a place readily accessible to residents. The findings include: On 12/07/2018 at approximately 1:30 PM surveyors held a Resident Council meeting during which residents were asked if they could read the results of the previous State inspection. None of the eight residents that attended the meeting, which included the Resident Council President, knew what the survey binder was, where it was kept or that the results of the previous survey should be available for residents to read without asking. At approximately 1:56 PM on 12/7/18, surveyors attempted to locate the facility's survey binder but were unsuccessful. During interview with the administrator at approximately 1:58 PM he stated that the binder was usually kept secured in a wire rack on the wall inside the front entrance and acknowledged that the survey binder was missing. At approximately 2:10 PM the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow the Health Care Decisions Act by obtaining the end of life wishes for a resident before being properly adjudicated. This was evident for 1 (Resident #82) of 2 residents reviewed for advance directives during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: A Maryland MOLST (Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form is used for documenting a resident's specific wishes related to life-sustaining treatments. The MOLST form includes medical orders for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and other medical personnel regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation and other life-sustaining treatment options for a specific patient. Instructions for completing a Maryland MOLST include: A Physician, Nurse Practitioner (NP), or a Physician Assistant (PA) must be accurately and legibly complete the form and then sign and date it. In Maryland Law: Surrogates and Life-Sustaining Treatment: A surrogate may consent to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-11 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the responsible party in writing of a resident's transfer to the hospital (#28) and failed to notify the State Ombudsman of two resident hospital transfers (#20, #73). This was evident for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1. Resident #28 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for a change in condition requiring hospital level care. The facility verbally notified the responsible party but not in writing in language that is understandable for the reason for the hospital transfer (the reasons for the transfer were not fully or clearly documented). Interview with the Director of Nursing on 12-7-18 at 1:30 PM confirmed that the facility failed to notify the responsible party in writing of a hospital transfer and the reason for the transfer. 2. A review of Resident #73's clinical record revealed on 7/23/18 the resident was sent to the hospital for treatment and evaluation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment accurately reflected a residents' status (#10, #36). This was evident for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. The findings include: The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. 1. Review of Resident #10's MDS assessments revealed the 5/31/18 assessment Section I reported the resident had a multi-drug resistant organism infection. Review of all the MDS assessments with Staff #11 on 12/10/18 at 12:00 PM confirmed the 5/31/18 assessment inaccurately reported Resident #10 had an infection. 2. Medical record review for Resident #36 revealed on 7/6/18 the facility staff assessed the resident and documented on the MDS-Section K0300: Weight Loss, the resident had a loss of 5% or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a review of resident clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to plan and develop a care plan to address the use of an anticoagulant (#75). This was evident for 1 out 7 residents chosen to be reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings are: A review of Resident #75's clinical record review revealed the resident's primary physician ordered Xarelto (a medication to thin the blood). Taking this medication increases the risk from bleeding. A care plan to address the risk for bleeding was not developed. The Director of Nursing was interviewed on 12/11/18 at 10:06 AM. She confirmed that the care plan was not done and informed me that the unit manager was developing a care plan.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to revise a comprehensive care plan for a resident (#79) with depression and to ensure the full interdisciplinary team including residents and/or their responsible parties are invited to the quarterly care plan meetings (#22). This was evident for 2 of 29 residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include: A care plan is a written guideline of care based on the individual resident's needs developed by an interdisciplinary team which includes nursing, rehabilitation staff, and dietary that communicates to other health care professionals. A written care plan decreases the risk of incomplete, incorrect or inaccurate care. 1. Depression is a mental disorder characterized by a pervasive and persistent low mood that is accompanied by low self-esteem and by a loss of interest or pleasure in normally enjoyable activities. The depressive disorder is a disabling condition that adversely affects a person's family or work life, sleeping and eating habits, and general health.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-12-11 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and resident and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to provide residents with showers. This was true for 2 out of 29 residents reviewed for ADL care during the survey process. The findings are: 1. The facility staff failed to provide showers for Resident #11. Interview with Resident #11 on 12/10/18 at 10:30 AM revealed the resident stating he/she did not receive showers. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 12/11/18 at 10:00 AM revealed Resident #11 was scheduled for showers on: Tuesday and Friday on 7-3 shift. Further record review revealed the facility staff failed to provide showers to Resident #11 from 11/11-11/26 and 11/28-12/10. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 12/11/18 at 1:00 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to provide showers to Resident #11. 2. The facility staff failed to provide showers to Resident #73. Record review revealed Resident #73 was scheduled for showers on Wednesday and Saturday, 7-3 shift. Further record review revealed the facility staff failed to document showers for Resident #73…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-12-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and resident and staff interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that dependent resident's personal hygiene needs were adequately met by offering and providing showers as scheduled. This was evident for 1 of 29 (#17) residents reviewed during the survey process. The findings include: In an interview with Resident #17 on 12/04/18 at 9:48 AM, revealed that Resident #17 stated they don't give showers I get a bed bath every day. I would like a shower. Review of Resident #17's most recent MDS completed on 9/8/18 revealed that s/he is total dependent for bathing requiring extensive assistance for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) revealed a score of 15 indicating adequate cognitive ability. The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow a written physician order in a timely manner (Resident #79). This is evident for 1 of 2 resident's reviewed in the hospice care area. The findings include: Resident #79 was admitted with a life altering condition and as a result had depression. Depression is a mental disorder characterized by a pervasive and persistent low mood that is accompanied by low self-esteem and by a loss of interest or pleasure in normally enjoyable activities. The depressive disorder is a disabling condition that adversely affects a person's family or work life, sleeping and eating habits, and general health. On 11/22/18 Resident #79 stated to a facility staff suicidal ideation's. After this was reported to the physician a psychiatric consult was ordered. The facility staff did not obtain the psychiatric consult until 12-6-18, 15 days after the suicidal ideation's were stated by Resident #79. After the psychiatric consult on 12-6-18 the written results were not available for 24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a review of a facility reported incident and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free of accidents (#282). This was evident for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed as part of a facility reported incident. The findings are: A review of the incident revealed that Staff #19 entered Resident #282's room on 10/12/18 to assist the resident to transfer from the bed to a wheelchair. Staff #19 ignored the wet floor sign and proceeded to assist the resident with the transfer. While transferring the resident to the wheelchair the resident slipped and started to fall. Staff #19 held onto the resident and assisted him/her to the floor. The resident did not complain of pain, but the facility staff sent the resident to the hospital for evaluation and to treat if necessary. The Director of Nursing was interviewed on 12/11/18. She stated she was aware of the incident and was made aware of the findings. Evidence to dispute the resident falling was not present prior to exit.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to document the amount of a supplement consumed for Resident #36 and failed to obtain a weight for Resident #36. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents selected for review of nutrition during the annual survey process. The findings include: 1A. The facility staff failed to document the amount of supplement consumed to ensure Resident #36 was drinking the supplement. Medical record review for Resident #36 revealed on 7/4/18 the dietitian (in collaboration with the physician ordered) Health Shake, daily at 2:00 PM as a supplement. Health shake is a balanced fortified nutrition which provides a convenient way to supplement calories and protein. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the facility staff documented the administration of the Health shake to the resident at 2:00 PM, however, failed to document the amount of the supplement consumed by Resident #36. Review of the MAR revealed the facility staff failed to document the amount of the Health shake consumed from:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-11 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain a psychiatric consultation for Resident #11 in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents selected for review for review of Behavior/Mood during the survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #11 revealed on 11/9/18 the physician ordered psychiatric consultation for withdrawn behavior. Further record review during the survey process revealed the facility staff failed to obtain the psychiatric consultation as ordered. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 12/11/18 at 9:30 AM revealed the facility staff failed to obtain the psychiatric consultation as ordered in a timely manner.
- Potential for harm · D2018-12-11 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed after assessing a resident (#79) to document the assessment in the medical record and provide a schedule of reassessments to monitor progress. This is evident for 1 of 26 residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include: Resident #79 was admitted with a life altering diagnosis and also depression related to the diagnosis. On 11-22-18 Resident #79 expressed suicidal ideation's to a facility staff member. Eight days later social worker #9 interviewed Resident #79 concerning the suicidal ideation's thoughts. Social Worker #9 did not document in the medical record the interview or the results for access by all facility staff. Social Worker #9 only sent an e-mail to the Director of Nursing with the assessment results. Social Worker #9 did not schedule follow-up times to monitor Resident #79's changing mood and only reassessed him/her 4 days later on a mandated quarterly assessment. On 12-7-18 at 11:26 AM the Director of Nursing confirmed that Social Worker #9 did not document in the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-12-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to hold blood pressure medication as ordered by the physician when the blood pressure was below the parameter for Resident #73. This was evident for 1 of 7 residents selected for unnecessary medication review. The findings include: Medical record for Resident #73 revealed on 7/26/18 the physician ordered: Atenolol 25 milligrams via G-tube every day for high blood pressure, hold for systolic blood pressure (top number) less than 110 or heart rate less than 60. A gastrostomy tube (also called a G-tube) is a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach. It is used to provide nutrition to individuals who have difficulty eating by mouth, cannot swallow safely, or need nutritional supplementation. Atenolol is in a group of drugs called beta-blockers. Beta-blockers affect the heart and circulation (blood flow through arteries and veins). Atenolol is used to treat hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-12-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to clearly identify target symptoms for the administration of psychotropic medications and establish a plan for the ongoing monitoring of those symptoms for Resident (#73). This was evident for 1 of 7 residents selected unnecessary medication for review in the stage 2 survey sample. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #73 revealed on 2/16/18 the physician ordered: Risperidone .5 milligrams by mouth every day for Bipolar. Risperidone, sold under the trade name Risperdal among others, is an antipsychotic medication. It is mainly used to treat bipolar disorder. Bipolar disorder, also known as manic-depressive illness, is a brain disorder that causes unusual shifts in mood, energy, activity levels, and the ability to carry out day-to-day tasks. On 11/13/18 the physician ordered: Depakote 125 milligram at hour of sleep for mood. Depakote is also used to treat manic episodes related to bipolar disorder (manic depression), and to prevent migraine headaches. Further record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2022-09-21 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to display the results of the annual recertification survey and plan of correction in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives. This was evident in 1 of 1 survey results book posted in the facility. The findings include: Surveyor observation of the lobby on 9/6/2022 through 9/9/2022 revealed no evidence of the State inspection results in an open and readily accessible area for residents, staff, and visitors to review and a tour of the facility did not reveal any signs posted telling residents where the state survey results were located. On 9/9/22 at 8:15 AM an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility staff failed to place the results of survey inspections in a place easily accessible to any persons to be reviewed.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56 WEST FREDERICK HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/01/2021 |
| STERN, ARYEH | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 05/01/2021 |
| SCHWARTZ, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2021 |
| RIZQUI, IBRAHIM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/13/2021 |
| SOWA, RONILYN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/15/2024 |
| EIDLISZ, SOLOMON | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| GLUCK, RIVKA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| ACCURATE STAFFING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2021 |
| BRAND SONNENSCHINE LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215074. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.