No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Autumn Lake Healthcare Post-Acute Care Center

5009 Frankford Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21206 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 225 certified beds · (410) 325-4000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 325-4000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (22% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5805 Moravia Rd · (410) 325-5700 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5150 Sinclair Lane · (410) 485-2772 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5150 Sinclair Ln · (410) 483-6674 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5602 Radecke Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.0%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.1%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms44.5%22.8%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.6%22.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.5%16.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%5.9%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.6%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.7%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.1%80.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.2%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.3%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.241.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.681.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 172 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
78.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 78.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 93 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.7%CMS range 39.8–54.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 8.2–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge78.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge91.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 5.4–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.261.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.82
RN hours/ resident / day
0.71
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.47
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.99
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.65
RN hoursweekends
21.8%
Total nursing turnover
17.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 225 beds and averages 204.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-24)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2023-03-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-03-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, administrative record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #362) from physical abuse from a facility staff member on 5/15/22. This was evident for 1 of 29 residents (Resident #362) reviewed for abuse during an annual recertification survey. Resident #362 sustained a fall during a physically abusive incident and suffered a fractured hip. Thereafter, Resident #362 never regained his/her ability to walk independently. This failure to protect residents from physical abuse by facility staff members resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. However, the facility developed, initiated, and completed an acceptable plan of correction to prevent further abuse which met all elements of past noncompliance. The period of noncompliance began on 5/15/22 and ended on 6/22/22. The Findings Include: Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a comprehensive assessment of a resident completed by facility staff. The MDS is a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician orders and provider recommendations were implemented timely following changes in condition. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) of 10 residents reviewed for quality of care during the complaint survey.The findings include:On 05/01/2026 at 12:41 PM, review of Resident #6's clinical record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, dementia, and chronic kidney disease.Further review of Resident #6's clinical record revealed a change in condition note dated 02/08/2026 showing the resident experienced a ruptured fluid blister to the left heel. Continued review of the note showed provider recommendations to cleanse the left heel with wound cleanser, apply Medihoney daily, and elevate the heel with a pillow.Continued review of Resident #6's February 2026 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) did not reveal evidence that provider-recommended wound treatment to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a closed medical record and all pertinent administrative records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure clinical records were complete and accurately documented. This was found to be evident for 1 (Residents #1) of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include:Documentation is an integral part of medication administration. Documentation communicates the timing, dosing, and effect of any medications received by a patient. In the setting of skilled nursing care, residents are often prescribed multiple medications for significant medical conditions. They are also often more vulnerable to medication errors and more prone to changes in condition that require review and adjustment of their medication regimen. Inaccurate medication documentation has the potential to place residents at significant risk of medication error, provide incomplete or inaccurate information for providers and care givers to evaluate, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to professional standards of quality of care based on established clinical practices, physician orders, or facility policies regarding enteral feeding and medication administration. This was evident for 4 residents (Residents #9, #210, #208 and #117) out of 4 residents reviewed for professional standards of quality care during the survey. Findings include:Professional standards of quality relate to the requirement that services provided in a long-term care facility must heavily involve proper medication administration practices. This regulation is part of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines for nursing homes, and citations often occur when facilities fail to adhere to established clinical practices, physician orders, or facility policies regarding medications. Facilities must ensure that all care and services, including medication administration, adhere to accepted standards of clinical practice. This is often interpreted through established guidelines like…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with staff and residents' families, and review of Complaints, it was determined that the facility failed to 1.) ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public; 2.) provide enough clean linen to all residents; and 3.) ensure repairs were made to a resident door and the hallways hand railings. This was evident for 5 (333137, 333135, 333139, 333141 and 333113) out of 5 complaint intakes; 2 (residents #11 and #140) out of 2 residents; and the hallway railing on the third-floor dementia unit observed for sanitary conditions during the survey. The findings include:1. On 11/20/2025 at 10:07 AM, the surveyor reviewed complaint #333113 which alleged that the facility did not have enough linen for all residents. On 11/24/2025 at 12:40 PM, the surveyor interviewed Staff member #18. During the interview, staff #18 mentioned that the facility does not have enough blankets for all the residents, and that the facility is currently in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' rights to a dignified existence during meals and incontinence care for residents. This was evident for 4 residents (#4, #188, #31 and #58) of 7 residents observed for dignity during the survey. 1. On 11/20/2025 at 11:00 AM the surveyor reviewed the Dietary Meal Serving form provided by the facility. The third-floor lunch meal delivery time was listed as 11:55 AM and 12:05PM for the residents listed as needing assistance with the meal. On 11/20/2025 at 12:08 PM the surveyor interviewed the GNA #24 regarding how the residents were monitored and/or fed in the dining room during meals. GNA #24 stated that she had been employed by the facility for the past three years. GNA #24 stated that clinical staff members are assigned to take turns feeding and monitoring residents in dining room throughout the shift. Also, GNA # 24 stated that a hospitality aide usually assist with distributing water and other fluids to the residents throughout the shift, however the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure the residents were provided with a homelike environment related to their rooms. This was determined to be true for three resident rooms, # 312, # 309, and #316 on one unit during surveyor observation tours at the facility.These findings include:On 11/18/2025 at 08:45 AM the surveyor performed walking observation rounds of the third floor nursing unit. rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were observed with dirty built up wax on the linoleum floors. On 11/20/2025 at 12:20 PM the surveyor observed room [ROOM NUMBER] had a deep gouge of missing wood on the door. The linoleum flooring in room # 312 was dirty with built up wax, in the bathroom there was a rusty bolt on the toilet, and black marks/stains within the toilet. The linoleum in the bedroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] had built -up wax and was dirty. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a broken bedside cabinet drawer with a broken handle.On 11/24/2025 at 4:13 PM the surveyor interviewed the housekeeping director, staff #19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise the care plan after each Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment known as required . This was evident for 1 (Resident #32) out of 2 residents selected for Dialysis review during the survey.Findings include:The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) defines the Minimum Data Set (MDS) as a standardized, comprehensive assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid-certified nursing homes and swing beds. It is a tool used to gather information on resident strengths and needs, develop individualized care plans, and is used for Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement and quality of care. Section N (High-Risk Drug Classes) of the MDS, is used to document the resident's medication status for injections, high-risk drug classes, and medication-related problems.On 11/20/2025 at 11:40 AM during record review of resident #32, the resident Care Plan (dated 9/11/25) revealed Resident is on Anticoagulant therapy related to cardiac disease process; Date Initiated: 06/06/2023; and Revision on:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to 1.) maintain up-to-date activity calendars in the residents' rooms; 2.) ensure the residents received activities that addressed the specific preferences and/or stimulation requested by family members of a dependent resident; and 3.) demonstrate that consistent activity services were provided and documented. This was evident for 3 (Residents #6, #101, and #1) residents out of 17 residents reviewed for Activities during the survey.The findings include:1. On 11/18/2025 at 8:21 AM, during the tour of the facility, the surveyor observed an outdated activities calendar in Resident #6's room. The calendar was from September 2025. On 11/19/2025 at 9:45 AM, during observation rounds, the surveyor observed an outdated activities calendar in Resident #6's room. The calendar was from September 2025. On 11/20/2025 at 8:41 AM, during observation rounds, the surveyor observed an outdated activities calendar in Resident #6's room. The calendar was from September 2025. On 11/20/2025 at 9:57 AM, the surveyor interviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews of facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident received appropriate supervision during care. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 80) of 2 residents reviewed for accidents during the survey conducted at the facility.Findings include,Resident # 80 was admitted to the facility with the following but not limited diagnosis: Marfan Syndrome (Genetic Disorder that affects the body's connective tissue, which supports bones, muscles, blood vessels and other organs), and Anoxic Brain Damage.A medical record review was conducted on 11/21/25 at 11:03 AM and it revealed the resident had a fall on 8/22/25. Review of the facility's fall investigation revealed that the resident's assigned GNA stated that the resident rolled out of bed while she was cleaning the resident. Resident was assessed and did not have any injuries.On the same date the resident fall care plan was reviewed, and it revealed the resident had an actual fall and was at high risk for falls related to paralysis, immobility with spontaneous autonomic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure safe enteral feeding practices by failing to: 1) ensure a resident's tube feeding was properly labeled with the rate of infusion; and 2.) ensure the time the feeding was hung and an inactive feeding setup was disconnected from the resident's PEG site to prevent potential complications of enteral feeding and to maintain dignity. This was evident for 3 (residents #9, #66 and #87) of 7 residents observed on tube feeding on during the survey. Findings include:A PEG tube, or Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy tube, is a feeding tube that is inserted through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach. It is used to deliver nutrition, fluids, and medications to individuals who cannot eat or swallow by mouth due to medical conditions. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recommend that staff practices for handling, hang-time, and changing tube feeding bags are consistent with accepted standards of practice for infection control and manufacturer instructions.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided consistent with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 4 (Residents #6, #101, #26 and #66) out of 12 residents observed with Tracheostomy tubes during the survey.Findings include:A manual resuscitator, also known as an Ambu bag, is a portable, handheld device used by trained medical professionals to provide positive pressure ventilation to patients who have insufficient or ineffective breathing. The device is essential for emergency situations, such as cardiac arrest, severe asthma attacks, or drug overdoses, to provide oxygen to a patient's lungs until more advanced medical equipment (like a mechanical ventilator) is available. 1. On 11/20/2025 at 7:38 AM, during observation rounds, the surveyor did not observe a manual resuscitator or bag valve mask in Resident #6's room. On 11/20/2025 at 7:42 AM, the surveyor conducted observation rounds Respiratory Therapist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, interviews with the family, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs, such as those in excessive dosage or given for an excessive duration. This was evident for 1 (Resident #208) out of 1 resident reviewed for unnecessary drugs.The findings include:On November 19, 2025, at 2:45 PM, the surveyor spoke with Resident #208's wife regarding the complaint intake. Resident #208's wife explained how she was upset with the facility for double-dosing her husband for 14 days. The wife explained how Resident #208 was very drowsy and looked sedated when she came to visit them. The wife was notified by the methadone program at the hospital of their denial to refill the methadone too soon after 12/30/24. The wife continued to explain how she had asked the nurses several times why Resident #208 was looking like that (sedated), but received no response. On 11/24/25 at 1 PM, the surveyor spoke with the Director of Nursing (DON) #2 and the Regional DON #17 about what happened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, interviews with the family, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of any significant medication errors. This was evident for 1 (Resident #208) out of 1 resident reviewed for medication errors.The findings include:On November 19, 2025, at 2:45 PM, the surveyor spoke with Resident #208's wife regarding the complaint intake. Resident #208's wife explained how she was upset with the facility for double-dosing her husband for 14 days. The wife explained how Resident #208 was very drowsy and looked sedated when she came to visit them. The wife was notified by the methadone program at [NAME] of their denial to refill their methadone too soon after 12/30/24. The wife continued to explain how she had asked the nurses several times why Resident #208 was looking like that (sedated), but received no response.On 11/24/25 at 1 PM, the surveyor spoke with the Director of Nursing (DON) #2 and the Regional DON #17 about what happened with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner to prevent the potential for food contamination. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any resident who consumes food prepared in the kitchen.Findings Include:During an observation on 11/18/25 at 9:00 AM, the following were noted in the kitchen food-service area:1. A large pile of dark black substance was observed on the floor under a shelf inside the walk-in freezer.2. The lid holder tray contained dried food residue.3. Chipping paint was observed on a post within the kitchen.4. Standing water was present on the floor near the dishwasher.5. Ten (10) ice cubes were observed spaced out across the kitchen floor.During follow-up observations on 11/19/25 at 10:00 AM and 11/20/25 at 11:00 AM, the above unsanitary conditions remained unaddressed.During an interview on 11/19/25 at 11:00 AM, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) (Staff #3) stated that the area should be cleaned each day. She acknowledged that the conditions observed should not have been present.After…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, interviews with the family, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medical records and forms were complete and accurately documented. This was evident for 3 (Resident #208, Residents #213, and Resident #214) out of 3 resident reviewed for medical records.The findings include:1. On November 19, 2025, at 2:45 PM, the surveyor spoke with Resident #208's wife regarding the complaint intake. Resident #208's wife explained how she was upset with the facility for double-dosing her husband for 14 days. The wife explained how Resident #208 was very drowsy and looked sedated when she came to visit them. The wife was notified by the methadone program at [NAME] of their denial to refill their methadone too soon after 12/30/24. The wife continued to explain how she had asked the nurses several times why Resident #208 was looking like that (sedated), but received no response. On 11/24/25 at 1 PM, the surveyor spoke with the Director of Nursing (DON) #2 and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices and guidelines to prevent the spread of germs and cross contamination of microorganisms in the facility. This was found to be evident for 5 occurrences 1.) Resident #31 during the initial tour and screening of residents; 2.) Resident #73 during a lunch dining observation; 3.) An observation made during a tour of the laundry area; 4.) An observation of a Clean Linen bin placed within a resident-use bathroom; and 5.) The urinary catheter bag of resident #26 observed on the floor.Findings include: 1. An initial tour of the building was conducted on 11/18/25 at 8:00AM by the survey team and while screening residents and making observations of the resident rooms, the following concerns were identified: Resident # 31's room was observed at approximately 9:00AM and was noted to have an odor present. There was a very large brown dried area noted on the floor underneath the resident bed and to the side. The resident was present in the room and was asked if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to thoroughly investigate a complaint of a neglect (Resident #35). This was evident for 1 out of 39 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Findings include: Review of Resident #35's facility reported incident (MD 00190514) on 10/8/23 at 11:00 am revealed the resident's family made an allegation of neglect after the resident fell on the unit on 3/14/23 and sustained a fracture leg. The surveyor reviewed the facility investigation on 10/8/24 at 11:30am revealed that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate the events surrounding the allegation of neglect. The investigation contained information about the fall incident on 3/14/24. The facility investigation did not contain other resident interviews disproving widespread negligence from staff. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 10/8/24 at 2:00pm confirmed the facility investigation of Resident #35's did not contain resident interviews disproving widespread negligence from staff.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — widespread
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice as evidenced by 1.) failure to follow physician orders for 1 of 8 (Resident #155) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, and 2 of 10 (Resident #40 and #19) residents reviewed for physician orders; 2.) failure of the GNA to notify the nurse after a resident had a fall for 1 of 5 (Resident # 609) residents reviewed for falls; 3.) failure of the facility to ensure that a resident received treatment for a possible wound infection for Resident #359, and 4.) failure to administer a pain medication for Resident #87 as ordered by the physician. This was found to be evident during the facility's annual Medicare/medicaid survey. The findings include: 1. Failure to follow physician orders regarding pressure ulcer dressing change On 3/14/23 at 2:30 PM surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN) #76 doing a dressing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to store, prepare, and serve food and beverages using proper sanitary practices. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: An initial tour of the facility's kitchen was conducted on 02/21/23 at 08:15 am with the Dietary Manager (DM) #27 present. After surveyors sanitized hands and donned hairnets. Dietary Aid (DA) #34 entered the kitchen, passed surveyors and DM #27, opened, and entered a storage refrigerator without sanitizing their hands. The DM #27 was alerted to the observation and asked what was the expectation of staff entering into the kitchen. The DM #27 replied that it was expected that all personnel sanitize their hands before entering any area of the kitchen, including the refrigerator. Observation of the storage refrigerator found and undated, opened partially exposed package of shelved cheese. Observation of the food preparation area revealed several storage racks with opened spices, seasonings food dyes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide an environment that promotes the dignity and respect for residents. This was found to be evident for Residents #16, #158, #37 and #362 and residents in Rooms #14, #18, #19, #20 sampled during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility reported incident MD00178528 dated 6/9/2022 and MD00178603 dated 6/10/2022, revealed that on 5/15/22 the facility received an accusation of resident to employee abuse by GNA #38, a contracted staff member. The Director of Nursing (DON) started the facility investigation of the abuse incident on 5/15/22. The facility had video surveillance of the area where the abuse incident was alleged to have taken place. The facility investigation was completed by 5/18/22 which substantiated GNA #38 violated facility policy by committing gross misconduct as shown in the video footage of the 5/15/22 abuse incident. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide and maintain a safe, clean, and homelike environment for the residents. This was evident for 2 (3rd floor Dementia Unit and the Terrace Unit) of 4 units observed during the survey. Findings Includes: 1. A tour of the 3rd floor Dementia unit was conducted on 02/21/23 at 08:00 AM where a loose partially attached bumper panel on the left side of elevator door casing was observed. Multiple dark stains, black streaks, dents, and holes were noted on the lower portion of the unit's hallway. Further observation revealed folded candy wrappers located inside the handrail ledge near the unit's utility closet. An observation of the unit's dining room at 08:40 am revealed 5 dining chairs with their seat areas pushed in and frayed fabric dangling from their bottoms. Observation of the two window seals and air conditioning units revealed a plastic cup with a dried substance inside sitting on the left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an administrative record review and interviews with the facility staff it was determined the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation into allegations of abuse. This was found to be evident for 4 (Residents #609, #42, # 356, and # 361) of 20 residents reviewed for abuse during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: 1. Intake MD00184687 was reviewed on 3/15/23 at 10:00 AM for allegations of abuse. According to the intake information, Resident #609's family reported to the facility on [DATE] that the resident was pushed from the wheelchair by Geriatric Nurse Assistant (GNA) #89. The facility DON was asked on 3/15/2023 at 10:15 AM if they had an investigation into the allegations and the facility subsequently provided the survey team with documentation of Resident #609 sustaining a hematoma to the forehead from a fall that occurred on 10/12/22 in the afternoon. Further review of the documentation on the same date at 10:30 AM included interviews with other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to: 1.) ensure that a plan of care was adjusted to reflect significant weight loss for (Resident #60) reviewed for nutrition and 2.) revise care plans with appropriate goals and interventions for 2 (Resident #155 and Resident #178) of 8 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, 2 (Resident #155 and Resident #188) of 5 residents reviewed for tube feeding, and 1 (Resident #188) of 3 residents reviewed for tracheostomy and 1 (Resident #178) 1 residents reviewed for anticoagulant therapy during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey process. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. The MDS provides a comprehensive assessment of the resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems. It is designed to collect the minimum amount of data to guide care planning and monitoring for residents in long-term care settings. A care plan is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to: 1.) administer a medication in accordance with the standards of practice for residents (Resident #87, #186, #117, #158, #84, #556) and 2.) document after medications were administered for residents (#172, #121, #155, #122, #188, #514 and #41). This was evident for 13 of 20 residents selected for review during a medication chart check during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #87's medical record on 3/5/23 at 9 pm revealed an ordered for Melatonin 3 MG (Milligrams) by mouth at bedtime for insomnia. The melatonin was to be administered at 9 pm with administration signed as given. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 3/1/23 at 9 pm revealed the Nurse, LPN #5 documented the Melatonin as being administered at 11:10 pm. During interview with the DON (Director of Nurse) on 3/5/23 at 10 pm, she verified the findings. During interview with the LPN #5 she stated the standard of practice is to administer the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on QAPI record review and interview, the facility failed to adequately monitor its practices around abuse, specifically abuse prevention, abuse reporting, and abuse investigation. The facility had repeat deficiencies for abuse prevention, abuse reporting and abuse investigation during this annual survey after submitting a plan of correction in January 2022. Findings include: On 3/21/23 at 7:30 am, review of facility's previous survey findings revealed the facility had deficiencies for abuse prevention, abuse reporting, and abuse investigations in January 2022. The facility submitted a Plan of Correction in January 2022 to address the deficiencies and the the Plan of Corrections was approved. On 3/21/23 at 7:40 am, review of deficient practices found during the facility's annual survey revealed repeated deficient practice for abuse prevention, abuse reporting, and abuse investigations. On 3/21/23 at 11:30am, during an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the QAPI Custodian #4, the surveyor revealed the survey team found repeated deficiencies around abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of a resident by failing to ensure a resident had the medical equipment needed for their disability status. This was evident in 1 of 72 (Resident #103) residents reviewed during the facility's annual survey. The findings include: On 2/22/23 at 11:32 am, the surveyor observed Resident #103 with bilateral lower extremity edema sitting in a wheelchair without the foot rests. The surveyor interviewed Resident #103 regarding the resident's needs. Resident #103 stated he/she requested wheelchair footrest, but the facility had failed to meet the request. Review of the medical records on 3/9/23 at 3:33 PM revealed a podiatry note dated 2/23/23 which revealed Resident #103 was diagnosed with insufficient blood flow to his/her lower extremities. The loss of blood flow to the lower extremities put Resident #103 at risk for pressures ulcers at his/her lower extremities so pressure relieving devices were needed per podiatry recommendations. On 03/09/23 04:30 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Assistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with the resident and facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a newly admitted resident received breakfast the following morning after being admitted . This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 607) of 107 residents sampled during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include, Residents that resided on the first floor were screened on 2/21/23 at 11:00 AM in accordance with the Long-Term Survey Process. During a brief interview each resident was asked if they are doing okay and if they have any concerns regarding the care that they were receiving at the facility. Upon entering Resident # 607's room, the resident was asked if there were any concerns regarding the care that was provided by the staff, and the resident replied, I did not get breakfast today. The resident further stated that no one came in to bring breakfast to him/her. An interview was conducted immediately with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 at 11:05 AM and he was made aware that Resident #607 did not receive a breakfast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician when a resident refused medications that have the potential to adversely affect their health when missed. This deficient practice was evident in 1(Resident #107) of 5 medical records reviewed for physician notification. The findings include: On 03/02/23 at 12:29 pm, a review of Resident #107's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2023 revealed the resident missed a dose of the antispasmodic medication on 02/01/23 at 8:00 am. Antispasmodics are used to relieve cramps or spasms of the stomach, intestines, and bladder. Further review of the MAR revealed that the resident refused 11 doses of a Statin medication for high cholesterol and 10 doses of an Anticholinergic for an Overactive Bladder. On 03/02/23 at 1:14 pm during an interview with Director of Nursing (DON) #2 when asked what the expectations of the staff are when a resident misses a medication or treatment, the DON reported the staff are to notify the provider, call the pharmacy to see why the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse to the state agency within two hours. This was evidenced in 1 (Resident #42) of 5 records reviewed for abuse. The finding includes: On 03/06/23 at 2:45 pm during an interview, Resident #42 stated he/she reported to Social Services Designee #24 that a female GNA came into the room on the evening of 03/04/23 badgering the resident about leaving the facility. The alleged GNA told the resident they didn't want him/her there. On 03/06/23 at 3:14 PM during an interview, Social Services Designee #24 indicated Resident #42 mentioned something happened over the weekend and Social Services Designee #24 reported it to Unit Manager #13. On 03/06/23 at 3:28 PM, in interview with Administrator #1 and the Director of Nursing #2, both verbalized being unaware of the alleged incident of verbal abuse that took place on the Terrace Level during the evening shift of 03/04/23 which verified the staff did not report the alleged abuse to the state agency within two hours. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the resident and or the resident responsible party (RP) received a written transfer notice with documentation of the reason for the transfer to the hospital prior to transfer. This was found to be evident for 3 (Residents #161, #166, and #556) of 4 residents reviewed for hospital transfers during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: 1. A medical record review was done on 2/23/23 at 2:56 PM and it revealed R# 161 was sent to the hospital. The resident had a change of condition on 4/19/22 and was sent to the hospital for further evaluation. The survey team requested a copy of the facility's transfer form that was provided to the resident upon transfer. The facility was unable to provide this document. The resident was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. The survey team requested a copy of the facility's transfer form that was provided to the resident upon transfer. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that residents or resident responsible party (RP) are given written notification of the facility bed-hold policy when they are being transferred out of the facility to a hospital. This was found to be evident for 3 (Residents #161, #166, and #556 ) of 4 residents reviewed for hospital transfers during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include, 1. A medical record review was done on 2/23/23 at 2:56 PM and it revealed Resident #161 was sent to the hospital due to a change of condition on 4/19/22. The survey team requested a copy of the facility's bed-hold form that was provided to the resident upon transfer. The facility was unable to provide this document to the survey team. The resident was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. The survey team requested a copy of the facility's bed-hold form that was provided to the resident upon transfer. The facility was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with the facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status as evidenced by: 1.) failure to accurately code: speech, vision, hearing, health condition and pain for 1 (Resident #155) of 2 residents reviewed for pain; 2.) failure to accurately code a resident for falls for 1 (Resident #506) of 5 residents reviewed for falls and 3.) failure to accurately code a resident for bowel and bladder incontinence for 1 (Resident #163) out of 5 residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence during the investigation stage of the survey. The findings include. The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. The MDS provides a comprehensive assessment of the resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems. It is designed to collect the minimum amount of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a care plan to 1.) reflect the presence of and current treatment of the residents' behavior for 1 of 5 (Resident #188) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications; 2.) to reflect a resident who required staff to provide care and mobility for 1 out of 4 (Resident #155) reviewed for mobility and 3.) reflect the specific care for a resident who was admitted with a Foley catheter (Resident #410). This deficient practice was evident for 3 of 10 residents reviewed for care plans during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is valuable in preventing avoidable declines in functioning or functional levels. It must reflect immediate steps for assuring outcomes which improve the resident's status and progress. 1. Review of Resident #188's medical records on 03/15/23 04:23 PM revealed the resident was admitted to the facility for long term care and with diagnosis that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to follow the proper procedures to safely transfer a resident. This was evident for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #93) reviewed for accidents during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: A Hoyer lift is a patient lift used by caregivers to safely transfer patients. It can be used for lifting patients from the floor or onto a healthcare bed. The lift also can assist in other surface-to-surface patient transfers, such as moving from a bed to a bath or chair. such as moving from a bed to a bath or chair. On 3/16/23 at 11 AM the surveyor observed a resident in the middle of the hallway being hoisted up from his/her chair and the 2 staff members transported the resident from the hallway into the room During an interview with geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) #78 the surveyor asked what resident was being transported into the room, she replied it was Resident #93. The surveyor asked what the procedure for moving a resident from the Hoyer lift into a bed. GNA #78 informed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control practices. This deficient practice was evident in 2 (Resident #48 and #133) of 2 residents observed with urinary drainage bags and 1 treatment cart located on the Terrace Level. The findings are: On 02/21/23 at 8:19 am during observation rounds on the Terrace Level, the surveyor observed the treatment cart located outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] was unlocked. Drawer #2 had used wound cleanser without a resident label, opened and exposed gloves, and gauze. Drawer #3 had a package of opened and exposed abdominal pads. Drawer #4 had an open package of Calcium Alginate, an open package of 4 x 4 gauze, and unpackaged gauze in Drawer #5. On 02/21/23 at 8:27 am LPN #14 confirmed the surveyor's findings on the treatment cart. On 02/21/23 at 8:44 am while in Resident #133's room, surveyor observed the leg of the bedside table was over the resident's urinary drainage bag on the floor. The resident's phone, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure all residents had access to a working call bell system. This deficient practice was evident in 1 of 7 (Resident #30) residents reviewed for a working call bell system. The findings include: On 3/09/23 at 6:08 pm, while on the Terrace Level in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident #30 came into the room via wheelchair and verbalized being cold. The surveyor instructed the resident to initiate the call bell for assistance. The surveyor observed the resident press the call bell twice. After five minutes none of the staff came to room [ROOM NUMBER]. The surveyor went outside of the room and noticed the call bell light outside of the resident's room was not on. The surveyor went to the nurse's station to get assistance for Resident#30. LPN #80 came to the resident's room and verified the call bell system for resident #30 was not working. The nurse connected the call bell cord to a y-connector and the call bell light came on. On 03/10/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-04-09 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility staff interviews with the DON (Director of Nursing) and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice to a resident and the responsible party of the transfer for 3 out of 3 people reviewed for transfer out to the hospital. Findings include: 1. On 3/28/19 at 11:33 AM a record review of resident # 9 was conducted. Resident # 9 was sent to the hospital on 1/13/19 for abdominal fullness and leaking around the supra pubic site. The nursing note stated the supra pubic catheter will need to be changed by interventional radiology at the hospital. An interview with the DON (Director of Nursing) was held on 3/28/19 at 11:33 AM, who showed the survey team a booklet which contained the information sent out with the resident. During this conversation DON stated the packet is given to the EMT (emergency medical team) driver. All paperwork including face sheet, Molst form, Transfer note, labs, Physician note, nurse note, consults and bed hold policy was given to EMT driver. NO care plan was sent out with resident. DON confirmed the Bed hold policy was not given…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-04-09 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility staff interviews with the DON (Director of Nursing) and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice to a resident and the responsible party of the transfer for 3 out of 3 people reviewed for transfer out to the hospital. Findings include: 1. On 3/28/19 at 11:33 AM a record review of resident # 9 was conducted. Resident # 9 was sent to the hospital on 1/13/19 for abdominal fullness and leaking around the supra pubic site. The nursing note stated the supra pubic catheter will need to be changed by interventional radiology at the hospital. An interview with the DON (Director of Nursing) was held on 3/28/19 at 11:33 AM, who showed the survey team a booklet which contained the information sent out with the resident. During this conversation DON stated the packet is given to the EMT (emergency medical team) driver. All paperwork including face sheet, Molst form, Transfer note, labs, Physician note, nurse note, consults and bed hold policy was given to EMT driver. DON confirmed the Bed hold policy was not given to the resident. DON could not locate or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-04-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident observation, responsible party and staff interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow enteral feeding standards of practice. This was evident for 1 out of 2 residents selected for Tube Feeding review involving resident #105 during the investigative portion of the survey process. When a person cannot eat any or enough food because of an illness. Others may have a decreased appetite, difficulties in swallowing, or some type of surgery that interferes with eating. When this occurs, and one is unable to eat, nutrition must be supplied in a different way. One method is enteral nutrition or tube feeding. Risk of aspiration should be assessed individually and appropriate interventions (e.g., proper positioning, rate of flow) implemented accordingly. The finding includes: On 4/3/19 at 10:15 A.M. during resident #105 observation who was admitted to facility with multiple medical diagnosis which includes but not limited to requiring enteral nutrition for daily nutritional needs to be met. 04/03/19 10:15 A.M. during resident #105 observation surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to treat residents with respect and dignified manner by knocking on resident's room doors before entering. This was evident for 2 out of 53 residents involving (R#105, and #192) observed during dining meal service. The finding include: 04/02/19 12:20 P.M. during second floor nursing unit lunch meal service observed geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) staff member #3 go in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] without knocking on resident's doors and not sanitizing hands between rooms with lunch meals trays. On 04/02/19 12:20 P.M. conducted staff interview with staff member #3 who informed writer the meaning of resident's dignity, and infection control practices. Staff member #3 verbally verified he/she forgot to knock on the resident's room door before entering and didn't wash or sanitized his/her hands between rooms during lunch meal service. 04/02/19 12:25 P.M. conducted staff interview with Nurse Unit Manager staff member #4 with who was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-09 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview with resident, observation of resident and a review of medical records, the facility failed to identify a resident with Dental issues. This was evident for 1 out of 53 residents with dental issues. Findings include: On 3/28/19 at 1:56 PM resident # 358 was interviewed. It was observed that resident had missing teeth and and discolored gums in the upper and lower gums. Resident stated they are decayed. Resident also stated no one here has looked at his/her mouth , nor has she/he had a dental appointment due to fact she/he had no dental insurance. Resident also stated she/he needed to see a dentist. On 3/1/19 when resident was admitted to the facility the admission assessment done by nurse at the time of admission did not identify the condition of resident's dental status. A conversation was on 4/4/19 at 11:38 AM with staff # 1, who is the MDS coordinator. The MDS dated [DATE] section L oral/dental status states there was no issue. (no broken teeth, no tooth fragments, no broken natural teeth.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview with resident, observation of resident and a review of medical records, the facility failed to identify a resident with Dental issues. This was evident for 1 out of 53 residents with dental issues. Findings include: On 3/28/19 at 1:56 PM resident # 358 was interviewed. It was observed that resident had missing teeth and and discolored gums in the upper and lower gums. Resident stated they are decayed. Resident also stated no one here has looked at his/her mouth , nor has she/he had a dental appointment due to fact she/he had no dental insurance. Resident also stated she/he needed to see a dentist. A conversation was had with staff # 1 on 4/4/19 at 11:38 AM who is the MDS coordinator. Nursing home MDS (minimal data set) coordinators maintain patient records adhering to state and federal regulations. They work closely with medical and administrative staff to continuously update patient records, and in most cases, handle the RAI (resident assessment instrument) process for patients from admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-09 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview with resident, observation of resident and a review of medical records, the facility failed to identify a resident with Dental issues and a resident who is on dialysis. This was evident for 2 out of 53 residents without a base line care plan. Findings include: 1. On 3/28/19 at 1:56 PM resident # 358 was interviewed. It was observed that resident had missing teeth and and discolored gums in the upper and lower gums. Resident stated they are decayed. Resident also stated no one here has looked at the mouth , nor has she had a dental appointment due to fact she has no dental insurance. Resident also stated she need to see a dentist. A conversation was had with staff # 1 who is the MDS coordinator on 4/4/19 at 11:38 AM. The MDS admission assessment reveals that section L oral/dental status states there was no issue. (no broken teeth, no tooth fragments no broken natural teeth. Staff #1 said she would review MDS and get back to me. Upon her return MDS coordinator confirmed the MDS was coded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview with resident, observation of resident and a review of medical records, the facility failed to identify a resident with Dental issues and a resident who is on dialysis. This was evident for 2 out of 53 residents without a comprehensive care plan. Findings include: 1. On 3/28/19 at 1:56 PM resident 358 was interviewed. It was observed that resident had missing teeth and and discolored gums in the upper and lower gums. Resident stated they are decayed. Resident also stated no one here has looked at the mouth , nor has she had a dental appointment due to fact she has no dental insurance. Resident also stated she need to see a dentist. A conversation was had with staff # 1 who is the MDS coordinator on 4/4/19 at 11:38 AM. Nursing home MDS (minimal data set) coordinators maintain patient records adhering to state and federal regulations. They work closely with medical and administrative staff to continuously update patient records, and in most cases, handle the RAI (resident assessment instrument)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-09 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a care plan for Resident #119 with a diagnosis of dementia. This was evident for 1 out of 53 Residents investigated during the survey process. The Findings Include: On 04/05/19 around 09:21 AM, this surveyor was reviewing Resident #119's medical record. It was noted that the Resident has a diagnosis of dementia. Further review of the record revealed that there were no interventions in the care plan for a resident with cognitive difficulties. A Care Plan is a formal process that includes correctly identifying existing needs, as well as recognizing potential needs or risks. This allows nursing to identify interventions to assist the Resident with any barriers that interferes with the Resident's optimal level of health.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Crystal SpringsElkins, WV 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glen BurnieGlen Burnie, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At HomewoodBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Long GreenBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at GreenfieldMilwaukee, WI 1 of 5Nella's At Autumn Lake HealthcareElkins, WV 2 of 5Ashbrook Care & Rehabilitation CenterScotch Plains, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Arlington WestBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Ballenger CreekFrederick, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Baltimore WashingtonGlen Burnie, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At BridgeparkBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At CatonsvilleCatonsville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glade ValleyWalkersville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Loch RavenBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At MadisonMadison, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Memorial BridgePenns Grove, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At NorwalkNorwalk, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At OverleaBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At PikesvillePikesville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RuxtonTowson, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Salem CountySalem, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At SouthgateCarneys Point, NJ 2 of 5King David Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBaltimore, MD 2 of 5The Subacute At Autumn Lake HealthcareVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Alice ManorBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Calvert ManorRising Sun, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chesapeake WoodsCambridge, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chevy ChaseChevy Chase, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Patuxent RiverLaurel, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Perring ParkwayBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RiverviewEssex, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Silver SpringSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Spa CreekAnnapolis, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Summit ParkCatonsville, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VinelandVineland, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VoorheesVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At West HartfordWest Hartford, CT 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at BeloitBeloit, WI 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at OceanviewOcean View, NJ 3 of 5Cornell Hall Care & Rehabilitation CenterUnion, NJ

Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PACC HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/18/2019
SIYATA DSHMAYA LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF8%since 06/18/2019
PACC REALTY HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/18/2019
SCHWARTZ, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
FENELON, JASONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/11/2022
SALAZAR, ANDRESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/18/2019
GLUCK, RIVKAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/23/2025
HANDLER, SAMUELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/08/2025
SAHAR, OPHIRIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/08/2025
A&R STERN FAMILY PA HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/18/2019
MEISELS, MORRISIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/18/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$33.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$7.4M
Related-party expense23% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 12%Other / private 8%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $7.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$428per resident / day
operating cost
$13,005per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$443per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215330. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next