No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Autumn Lake Healthcare At Alice Manor

2095 Rockrose Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21211 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 105 certified beds · (410) 889-9700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 889-9700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
3825 Greenspring Ave, Baltimore, MD 21211
Pharmacy
Grocery
3524 Cottage Ave
Park
2165 Druid Park Dr · (410) 523-7823 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2000 Druid Park Dr · (410) 338-0999

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.1%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.5%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms71.9%22.8%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.4%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.3%22.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.3%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%5.9%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.9%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.1%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.0%80.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.3%21.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.6%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.701.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.311.201.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.0%CMS range 40.1–71.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 7.1–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified66.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.5–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.271.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.11
RN hours/ resident / day
1.19
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.88
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.12
RN hoursweekends
69.7%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 98.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.11 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.11 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-01)
23
at the previous standard inspection (2021-06-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-11-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of pertinent facility documentation, hospital record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant med errors as evidenced by a resident being administered medication that was not prescribed resulting in the resident ' s hospitalization. This was evident for 1 (#16) of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration during a complaint survey. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident #16. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following this incident and prior to the start of this survey. The facilities plan and action were verified during this survey, therefore this deficiency was found to be past noncompliance with a compliance date of 3/15/24. The findings include: Methadone (a synthetic opioid used medically to treat chronic pain and opioid use disorders). Naloxone (Narcan) is a medication that quickly reverses an overdose of opioids. On 11/15/24 at 9:00 AM, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility records, interviews with staff, and interviews with residents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow its established grievance process. This failure was identified in 3 of the 22 cases reviewed (Residents #2, #51, and #91) during this recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:During an interview on 4/15/26 at 2:11 PM, Resident #2 stated, The facility sends laundry to another state, and it takes more than a week to return. Some of my clothes were missing, and the facility offered lower-quality replacements, which I refused. The items remain missing.On 4/16/26 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility's grievance logs. Records indicated that while some reports of missing clothing were resolved via reimbursement, others remained unresolved despite being marked as addressed.A grievance form dated 10/30/25 documented Resident #91's report of missing clothing. The facility recorded the resolution on 11/03/25 as clothes replaced. However, during an interview on 4/16/26 at 10:48 AM, Resident #91 stated he/she had missing clothes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of complaints, observations, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sufficient staffing levels to meet the needs of its residents. This was evident in statements from 6 out of 10 interviewable residents (Resident #23, #29, #45, #54, #55, and #60 ), 1 of 11 complaints, and statements from nursing staff (2 out of 3) during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) Interviews with residents (Resident #23, #29, #45, #54, #55, and #60) during the screening process on 4/24/25, revealed concerns regarding staffing levels: - On 4/24/25, at 9:12 AM, Resident #45 stated that the facility experienced the worst staffing on the evening shift (3:00 PM - 11:00 PM for Geriatric Nurse Aides). - On 4/24/25, at 10:26 AM, Resident #23 said, The nurses bring my medication whenever they want to; sometimes I get medication at noon. They are always short-staffed. Sometimes it takes them 2 hours to answer the call lights. - On 4/24/25, at 11:45 AM, Resident #60 stated, It takes hours to get assistance, especially…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper labeling of food and that food items were not expired, as evidenced by multiple food items unlabeled and expired in the refrigerator, freezer, and pantry. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 04/24/25 at 07:20 AM, the initial tour of the kitchen with staff #27 revealed: In the walk-in refrigerator there were 12 total expired 12-packs of hamburger buns. 3 bags expired on 4/3/23, 4 bags expired on 4/17/25, and 5 bags expired on 4/22/25. In the walk-in freezer there was a bin labeled for discard which had 4 packs of 8 pieces of frozen waffle without an expiration date, there was an unlabeled and opened blue bag of green beans, there was a bag labeled slices of meat for sandwiches, 4/10/25, there was a box of french toast and a box of frozen chopped carrots both were open to air and did not have an expiration date, there were two bins full of 16 total frozen chunks of unlabeled meats. In the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe environment. This was evident for 1 of 2 soiled utility rooms observed during a tour of the environment during the recertification/complaint survey. Findings Included: On 05/01/25 at 10:13 AM, during a tour of the facility during the system triggered environment task, it was observed that the soiled utility room on the first floor was unlocked, this soiled utility room contained used biohazard bags, used needle/sharps containers, used oxygen equipment and trash. On 05/01/25 at 10:47 AM, during the facility tour with the Maintenance Director (Staff #26), he was notified that the soiled utility room on the 1st floor was unlocked and was a safety concern. He attempted to lock the door, but he was unable to fix the issue, and he stated he was not sure why the door was unlocked, and they would address the issue. On 05/01/25 at 11:28 AM, in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON was notified that the 1st floor soiled utility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide adequate responses to grievances presented by the residents. This was evident for 2 (Resident #55, #64) of the 3 residents whose grievance records were reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) During the screening process on 4/24/25, at 2:00 PM, Resident #55 reported that a couple of weeks prior, he/she was upset with a facility staff member, Geriatric Nurse Aide #31, because the aide had caused a plant to die. The resident stated that this plant had been given to him/her by a loved one. Resident #55 stated that he/she had requested that GNA #31 not come into his/her room, as seeing the staff member reminded him/her of the situation and caused him/her distress. Resident #55 stated that even though he/she had requested that GNA #31 not enter his/her room, the GNA still entered to care for his/her roommate. Resident #55 said, I did not understand why the staff still entered my room. I did not need to see him. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to keep residents free from accidents and hazards, as evidenced by; 1) the failure to lock a Geri chair while a resident was using it. This was evident in 1 (Resident #75) of the 3 residents reviewed for fall risk during the recertification/complaint survey. Also, the facility failed to 2) ensure the resident's environment was free from accident hazards by failing to keep a resident's fall mat clear of other objects. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 43) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Huntington's disease (HD) is an inherited neurological disorder that causes the breakdown of nerve cells in the brain, leading to a progressive decline in movement, cognitive function, and psychiatric health. The symptoms include uncontrolled, jerky movements (chorea), difficulty with balance, and coordination problems. A Geri chair, also known as a geriatric chair or medical recliner, is a type of chair designed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate the use of nonpharmacological methods for pain management tool on the Resident's Medication and Treatment Administration Record (MAR and TAR). This was evident in the review of 1 of 1 (Resident #49) reviewed for unnecessary medications during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 04/29/25 at 09:34 AM during an unnecessary medication review for Resident #49, the surveyor found a physician order dated 12/24/2024 at 14:30 for Acetaminophen Oral Tablet 325 MG (Acetaminophen), Give 650 mg by mouth every 4 hours as needed for mild pain. Pain assessment: Pain management score .0=no pain, 1-3=mild pain, 4-7=moderate pain, 8-10=severe. Regularly assess those residents who receive routine pain medication every shift. The care plan review on 4/29/25 at 09:47 was initiated on 12/1/24 and indicated that Resident #49 had potential for alteration in comfort related to acute illness and chronic morbidities. The goal was for Resident to express level of comfort…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) received the required training to become a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) within the 4-month timeframe, and that all nursing staff maintained active licenses. This was evident in 1 (Staff #20) of the 3 CNA/GNA employee records reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On [DATE], at 6:00 PM, the surveyor reviewed a randomly selected sample of 3 CNA/GNA employee files. The review revealed that Staff #20, who was hired in [DATE] as a CNA, did not possess an active license. The Maryland Board of Nursing license verification website showed that Staff #20's CNA license had expired on [DATE], and the status for the entry date of [DATE], was listed as pending. Furthermore, the staff member's training records contained no documentation to support that she had received the necessary training and/or testing to become a GNA. During an interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of records, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure narcotics removed from the resident's supply were administered to the resident, as evidenced by staff documenting the removal of narcotics without documentation of the need for the narcotic or documentation that the narcotic was administered to the resident. This was evident for 2 (#38 and #69) of 2 residents reviewed for controlled drug administration and medication administration records reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 04/29/25 at 01:00 PM, the surveyor conducted a review of the facility's controlled drug administration records for medication cart 1 on floor 1 and medication cart 1 floor 2. 1) In medication cart 1 on floor 1, Resident #69's controlled drug administration record was reviewed for an order, Oxycodone 5mg 1 capsule by mouth every 12 hours as needed. During the review of the controlled drug record the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) was also being reviewed in order to compare and check…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement behavior monitoring for residents receiving antipsychotics medications and to ensure a resident received medications as ordered. This was evident for 3 (#34, #44 and #49) out of 5 reviewed for unnecessary medications during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings are: 1) A review of Resident #34's clinical record on 4/29/24 at 8:37 AM revealed the resident was being administered Seroquel 25 mg at bedtime for bipolar disorder. The physician ordered that the resident's behavior be monitored. The resident had a care plan to address: The resident has a behavior problem related to threatening, vandalism, using profanity on staff. The goal of this care plan was for the reduction of the behaviors. A behavior monitoring log would allow staff to determine if there is a decrease. A review of the resident's Medication Administration Records (MAR) revealed there was no behavior monitoring. The survey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 44 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and a review of medical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dental services on a routine or emergent basis receive necessary and recommended dental services in a timely manner. This was evident for 2 (#55, #60) of 4 residents reviewed for dental services during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) During an interview on 4/24/25, at 2:13 PM, Resident #55 reported that he/she requested dental services but never received them. The resident stated, The facility said my insurance is not covering that service. Resident #55 further indicated that the facility never followed-up on this request. A review of Resident #55's medical records on 4/28/25, at 10:44 AM revealed that there was no dental consultation documentation since the resident's admission in February 2024. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 4/28/25, at 11:10 AM, the DON explained that the facility had a contracted dental services team that visited monthly for resident dental care. The team followed residents on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for enhanced barrier precautions while administering medications, and 2) ensure nursing staff use appropriate infection control practices during medication administration. This was evident for 2 (LPN #12 and LPN #16) out of 3 staff members observed during medication administration. It was also determined that the facility failed to 3) maintain isolation precautions as ordered. This was evident for 1 (Resident #16) of 24 residents records reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey process. The findings include: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are infection control measures, particularly in nursing homes, that expand the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) like gowns and gloves beyond the standard precautions for anticipated blood and body fluid exposures. This focused approach aims to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). A midline (also called a midline catheter) is an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and an investigation of intake #MD00217176 it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure all nursing staff were educated on the location of the facility's Automated External Defibrillator (AED). This was evident for 3 staff (Staff #23, 24, 25) out of 11 who were interviewed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings are: An AED is a portable, user-friendly medical device designed to analyze a person's heart rhythm and deliver an electric shock, if necessary, to restore a normal heart rhythm. An investigation of intake #MD00217176 for Resident #94 was conducted on 4/30/25 and 5/1/25. On 4/30/25 from 2:00 PM to 3:00 PM and on 5/1/25 at 7:01 AM survey member conducted interviews with nursing staff related to the AED and their locations. Eleven members of the nursing staff were interviewed and three of them did not know where the AED's were located. Staffing of those interviewed were: 3 Licensed Practical Nurses (all agency), 1 Certified Medication Aide (CMA)(staff), and 7 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) (6 agency and 1 staff) were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on complaint, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide maintenance and housekeeping services to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for the residents. This was evident for the residents residing on the first floor of the facility during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of complaint MD00202825 on 11/12/24 revealed an allegation that the facility was very unclean. Observations of the first floor dining and activity room on 11/12/24 at 9 AM revealed a painting and the activity calendar (July 2024) resting on the floor, orange colored buckets with fish aquarium equipment and construction tools and debris, the HVAC units (6) are observed with dust, cobwebs and debris located in the top grates were the heating and air conditioning would exit the unit, and 10 unpackaged brand new chairs stacked in the middle of the room. The large pane windows in the dining/activity room were noted with cobwebs, general dirt and leaves that block the view on the property. In an interview with the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency immediately, but not later than two hours after an incident occurred for 4 (Residents #28, #37, #39, and #41) of 15 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, reviewed 11/13/2023, revealed, VII. Reporting/Response. A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services, and to all other required agencies (e.g.[exempli gratia, for example], law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #28 on 10/23/2018. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 10. Resident #41 A Comprehensive & [and] Extended Care Facilities Self-Report Form, dated 03/09/2022, revealed Resident #41 reported that on 03/08/2022 at 10:00 PM, they were kicked in the back. It was determined Geriatric Nurse Aide (GNA) #22 fit the description given by the resident of the accused staff. The resident later changed their statement to say the incident happened on 03/05/2022, and the aide pushed his knee into the resident's back. The facility's investigative file did not contain any interviews with other residents to determine the extent of the alleged abuse by GNA #22, and no information was provided on the resident census at the time or the mental status assessments of the residents on GNA #22's hall at the time of the incident. During an interview on 11/10/2024 at 11:59 AM, the Administrator stated he did not see any resident interviews for this incident other than the resident making allegations. 11. Resident #41 and Resident #40 A Comprehensive & Extended Care Facilities Self-Report Form,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the residents' rights to be free from verbal abuse from staff and sexual abuse from another resident, which affected 3 (Residents #27, #28, and #39) of 15 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #37 sexually abused Resident #39, and Resident #27 and Resident #28 were verbally abused by a staff member. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, reviewed 11/13/2023, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The policy revealed, 'Abuse' means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations. The policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident's representative(s) in writing of the reason for transfer or discharge, along with the required notification information, in a language and manner they understand and document that notification in the medical record. This was evident for 1 (#18) of 23 residents reviewed for complaints. The findings include: On 11/13/24 at 11:45 AM, a review of Complaint #MD00210696 was conducted. In the complaint, the complainant reported that s/he was not notified when Resident #18 was transferred and admitted to the hospital. On 11/14/2024 at 10:32 AM, a review of Resident #18's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in September 2022, and, in October 2024, Resident #18 was transferred to the hospital. There was no evidence in the clinical record that the facility staff had provided the resident's representative with written notification of the transfer at the time of transfer or as soon as practicable after the date of transfer out of the facility to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to code the resident's status accurately on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (Resident #8). This was true for 1 of 20 resident complaints reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: The facility staff failed to accurately document a residents' medication status on an admission MDS for Resident #8. The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff members gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. A review of Resident #8's closed medical record on 11/13/24 at 10 AM revealed that an admission MDS was completed on 05/29/23. The MDS coded the resident under Section M0210 (unhealed pressure ulcers) as yes. However, a review of the nursing and physician assessments did not reveal Resident #8 had any healing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a complaint, a closed medical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to initiate a care plan for a resident with a history of substance abuse disorder. This was evident for 1 (Resident #24) of 20 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of complaint MD00203494 on 11/19/2024 revealed allegation that Resident #16 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] with a change in condition. While Resident #16 was being evaluated in the emergency room, Resident #16 was identified as have received Methadone. Methadone is administered to treat moderate to severe pain. Methadone can also treat narcotic drug addiction. Resident #16 was a roommate to Resident #24 in March 2024. Review of Resident #24's closed medical record on 11/19/24 at 11 AM revealed diagnoses including a cerebrovascular accident, seizures, alcohol dependence and substance abuse disorder. Resident #24 was receiving the medication Methadone for substance abuse disorder. Upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on compliant, reviews of a closed clinical record and administrative records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received services to promote healing of a surgical wound. This was found evident in 1 (Resident #14) out of 2 Residents reviewed for wound care during a complaint survey. The finding include: A wound vacuum, also known as a vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) or negative-pressure wound therapy, is a medical device that uses suction to help wounds heal. Review of complaint MD00202563 on 11/12/24 at 11 AM revealed an allegation that Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an abdominal surgical wound that was to have a wound-vac applied upon admission. The wound-vac was not applied on 01/03/24. Review of Resident #14's closed medical record on 11/12/24 revealed a nursing note, dated 01/04/24 at 10:30 PM indicating Resident #14 called 911 to be transported back to the hospital because the facility had not obtained a wound-vac and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on compliant, reviews of a closed clinical record and administrative records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received services to promote healing of a pressure ulcer. This was found evident in 1 (Resident #6) out of 2 Residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during a complaint survey. The finding include: A pressure ulcer (also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer) is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according to their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II (superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister, or shallow crater), Stage III (full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), and Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone, or tendon). Review of complaint MD00188407 on 11/12/24 at 11 AM revealed an allegation that Resident #6 developed bed sores on his/her buttock area. A review of Resident #6's closed clinical record on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to investigate a fall, determine root cause, and implement interventions to prevent further falls for 1 (Resident #40) of 1 resident reviewed for accidents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, revised 02/2018, indicated, After a fall: - If a resident has just fallen or is found on the floor without a witness to the event, nursing staff will record vital signs and evaluate for possible injuries to the head, neck, spine, and extremities. - An incident report must be completed for resident falls. The incident report form should be completed by the nursing supervisor/charge nurse on duty at the time and submitted to the Director of Nursing Services. The policy revealed, The nursing staff will begin to try to identify possible or likely causes of the incident. They will refer to resident-specific evidence including medical history, known functional impairment, etc. [et cetera; and so forth]. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #40 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and interview with resident and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate interventions for a resident with identified history of trauma. This was evident for 1 (#19) of 23 residents reviewed for complaints. The findings include: On 11/13/24 at 10:58 AM, a review of complaint # MD00211446 revealed the complainant reported that in October 2024, during a visit with Resident #19, in response to interactions with Resident #19, the complainant alleges s/he encountered unprofessional and inappropriate conduct from facility staff related to his/her interactions with Resident #19. On 11/14/24 at 2:07 PM, a review of Resident #19's electronic medical record (EMR) was conducted. The medical record documented that Resident #19 had medically complex conditions with multiple diagnosis which included Parkinson's, Schizophrenia, and depression and resided in the facility for long term care following admission to the facility in May 2023 until the beginning of September 2024, when the resident was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview It was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's medication regimen was free from an unnecessary psychotropic medication failing to ensure that a psychotropic medication prescribed as needed was limited to 14 days. This was evident for 1 (#17) of 23 residents reviewed for complaints. The findings include: As needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. If the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order. On 11/12/24 at 10:33 AM, a review of complaint #MD00210287 was conducted. In the complaint, the complainant expressed concerns with how Resident #17's medication prescribed. On 11/12/24 at 12:36 PM, a review of Resident #17's November 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a 6/10/24 order for Ativan (Lorazepam) Injection Solution, inject 2 milligrams (MG) intramuscularly (IM)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a closed medical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff obtained a laboratory specimen on a resident without a physician's order. This was evident for 1 (Resident #14) of 20 complaints reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: A review of Resident #14's closed medical record on [DATE] at 10 am, revealed a laboratory result, dated [DATE] at 9:33 am, that indicated Resident #14's TSH and Free T4 levels were within normal limits. Further review of Resident #14's closed medical record indicated that Resident #14 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and Resident #14's physician instructed the nursing staff to obtain a TSH level on [DATE] to measure Resident #14's Thyroid function (TSH). The facility laboratory staff obtained a blood specimen on [DATE] and reported on [DATE] that Resident #14's TSH level was 59.35 (normal 0.45 - 4.50) Resident #14's physician was notified and Resident #14's thyroid medication was adjusted. Resident #14's physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-06-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespread
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to 1) ensure that drug regimen reviews were done for all residents at least monthly, 2) ensure tht pharmacist recommendations were acted upon timely from identified irregularities during the monthly pharmacy review and 3) have evidence that drug regimen reviews were completed, addressed and acted on by the physician. This was evident for 4 (#32, #31, #54, #9) out of the 5 residents reviewed for medication regimen review during the annual survey but affected all residents in the facility. The findings include: 1) A record review was conducted for Resident #32 on 6/7/21 at 12:33 PM. Documentation of the monthly drug regimen reviews were not found in Resident #32's medical record. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/9/21 at 8:23 AM. The DON stated the pharmacist was doing monthly reviews remotely and would send the report to the DON and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). The pharmacy reviews/ recommendations would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. This was observed on 1 of 2 nursing units during the annual survey. The findings include: On 6/11/21 at 12:01 PM, an environmental tour was conducted with the Director of Maintenance and the following observations that had been made during the survey were brought to his attention: The right and left wheelchair armrests were missing from the wheelchairs in room [ROOM NUMBER]-1 and room [ROOM NUMBER]. The right wheelchair armrest was missing from the wheelchair in room [ROOM NUMBER]-2, room [ROOM NUMBER]-1 and room [ROOM NUMBER]. The left wheelchair armrest was missing on the wheelchair in room [ROOM NUMBER]-2. The vinyl covering on the right wheelchair armrest in room [ROOM NUMBER]-2 was split on the back panel with yellow foam exposed. The following observations were made while on tour with the Maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-14 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to document that information was provided to the acute care facility when a resident was transferred there emergently. This was evident for 2 (#229, #129) of 5 residents reviewed for transfer to an acute care facility. The findings include: 1a) Review of Resident #229's medical record on 6/8/21 at 7:55 AM revealed a nursing note dated 10/11/20 at 18:47 which documented that Resident #229 was found face down, lying in the hallway, bleeding with a deep laceration to the right side of the nose. Resident #229 was transferred to an acute care facility for treatment. 1b) Continued review of Resident #229's medical record revealed a change in condition note dated 10/12/20 at 6:50 AM which documented that Resident #229 was face down on the floor with a hematoma on the forehead. Resident #229 was sent out to an acute care facility. 1c) Further review of the medical record for Resident #229 revealed a change in condition note dated 11/10/20 at 17:27 documenting that Resident #229 complained of pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-14 · tag F0624 — pattern
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to orient, prepare, and document a resident's preparation for a transfer to the hospital. This was identified for 2 (#229, #233) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey. The findings include. 1a ) Review of Resident #229's medical record on 6/8/21 at 7:55 AM revealed a nursing note dated 10/11/20 at 18:47 which documented that Resident #229 was found face down, lying in the hallway, bleeding with a deep laceration to the right side of the nose. Resident #229 was transferred to an acute care facility for treatment. 1b) Continued review of Resident #229's medical record revealed a change in condition note dated 10/12/20 at 6:50 AM which documented that Resident #229 was face down on the floor with a hematoma on the forehead. Resident #229 was sent out to an acute care facility. 1c) Further review of the medical record for Resident #229 revealed a change in condition note dated 11/10/20 at 17:27 documenting that Resident #229 complained of pain in the upper left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-14 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 1 (#32) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 2 (#232, #233) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) Review of Resident # 32's medical record on 6/7/21 at 12:33 PM revealed a quarterly MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/29/21 that failed to capture diagnoses of depression, osteoporosis, anemia, GERD (Gastroesophageal reflux disease) and insomnia in Section I, Active…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5). This surveyor interviewed Resident #65 on 6/3/21 at 12:57 PM. The resident stated that he/she was not consulted with plan of care changes. A review of Resident #65's clinical record on 6/11/21 revealed that the resident had a care plan meeting on 2/3/21, but the resident was not invited. The Assistant Director of Nursing and Social worker were interviewed on 6/11/21 at 1:06 PM. She confirmed that the invitations sent to the responsible party and the resident were not in the chart. It was not evident that the resident was invited. The Administrator, Director of Nursing, and ADON were informed of the findings on 6/11/21 at 1:30 PM. Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff 1) failed to review and revise the interdisciplinary care plans after MDS assessments and 2) failed to ensure that care plan meetings were held with the interdisciplinary team and residents/or resident responsible party. This was evident for 6 (#32, #46, #232, #233, #65, #1 ) of 60 residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and observation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure food was served in a palatable manner. This was evident for 2 (#30, #329) out of 3 residents reviewed for complaints about food. The findings include: 1. During the initial tour of the facility Resident #30 was interviewed on 6/3/21 at 1:40 PM and stated that the food tastes terrible. A test tray was obtained on 6/9/21 at 12:56 PM. Temperatures were taken to evaluate the palatability. The pork chops were 84 degrees F (Fahrenheit), the mashed potatoes were 114F, and the kale was 131F. A temperature of 130 degrees or above would indicate that hot food is served at level of palatability. The Administrator (Staff #4), Director of Nursing (Staff #3), and Assistant Director of Nursing (Staff #2) were informed of the findings on 6/11/21 at 1:30 PM. 2) During an interview for the facility's annual survey on June 4, 2021 at 9:50 AM, Resident #329 complained about the quality of the food served to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on administrative record review, medical record review, observation and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility 1) failed to document in the resident medical record that pain medication was refused when offered to a resident for their complaints of pain 2) failed to provide the correct Advanced Beneficiary Notice to residents who received Medicare Part A services, 3) failed to protect resident medical information, 4) failed to accurately document when a treatment was or was not done and 5) failed to timely write a progress note. This was found to be evident for 7 ( #179, #331, #332, #333, #132, #32, #229) 60 residents reviewed and for 9 resident room numbers of 60 residents reviewed during the annual survey The findings include: 1) On 6/8/21, complaint # MD00164919 was reviewed for multiple concerns. One of the concerns was resident # 179's transfer to an acute care hospital on 3/5/21 for chronic back pain. Review of the medical record on 6/8/21, and a pain assessment done on 3/5/21,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices and guidelines to prevent the transmission and spread of germs and microorganisms in the facility. This was found to be evident during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: 1) On 6/3/21 at 9:33 AM, Staff # 10 was observed leaving Resident #181's room without wearing a gown or eye protection. Resident #118 was newly admitted without verification of their COVID status. The door was open and there were no Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) signs posted on the door. Staff # 10 did not wear a gown or eye protection while inside of the resident room while they were providing services to the resident. An interview was conducted with the ADON, on 6/3/21 at 10:00 AM, and she stated that the resident was admitted to the facility 2 days ago and the facility was awaiting documentation of the resident Covid Vaccination status to be brought in by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-14 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a PASARR was completed for the residents (Resident #31). This was evident for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR compliance. The findings are: Residents are required to have a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) completed as part of the admission process. A PASARR is federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. A review of Resident #31's clinical record on 6/4/21 and 6/11/21 revealed that the PASARR was not in the clinical record. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the social worker were interviewed on 6/11/21 at 1:06 PM. They said it was not in the clinical record because it was pulled for the survey team. They said they would provide a binder with all of the PASARR's in them. The PASARR provided was completed on 12/17/20. It was reviewed and Section C was incomplete. The Administrator (Staff #4), Director of Nursing (Staff #3), and the ADON (Staff #2) were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to develop and initiate a comprehensive, for a resident that was resident centered and specific to the resident's needs. This was evident for 1 (#32) of 5 residents reviewed for mobility and 1 (#79) of 16 residents reviewed in relation to complaints during an annual survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Resident #32's medical record was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that activities of daily living (ADL's) were provided to residents who needed assistance (Resident #31). This was evident for 1 out of 4 residents reviewed for ADL care. The findings are: During the tour of the facility on 6/4/21 at 8:09 AM, Resident #31 was observed to have long fingernails on both hands. Resident #31 was observed again on 6/10/21 at 12:36 PM to have long fingernails. The Administrator (Staff #4), Director of Nursing (Staff #3), and the Assistant Director of Nursing (Staff #2) were informed of the findings on 6/11/21 at 1:30 PM.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide care and treatment to Resident #32 in accordance with physician's orders and then signed off that the treatment was performed. This was evident for 1 (#32) of 5 residents reviewed for mobility. The findings include: Observation was made, on 6/3/21 at 9:54 AM, of Resident #32 lying on his/her right side with his/her feet on the bottom sheet and nothing under the heels. A second observation was made with a second surveyor present on 6/3/21 at 2:02 PM of Resident #32 lying on the right side with feet crossed and on the bottom sheet. The heels were not offloaded. Subsequent observations were made on 6/4/21 at 7:15 AM, on 6/4/21 at 1:45 PM and on 6/7/21 at 11:05 AM of Resident #32 lying in bed, partially on the right side and the feet were not offloaded. On each day, 6/3, 6/4 and 6/7/21 the assigned nurse signed off on Resident #32's June 2021 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) that the feet were offloaded. Review of Resident #32's June 2021 physician's orders documented,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent infection to an existing pressure ulcer for Resident #46. This was evident for 1 (#46) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during the annual survey. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #46, on 6/7/21 at 7:23 AM, revealed a weekly skin evaluation with documentation that Resident #46 had a Stage 3 wound to the right buttock with a date of onset of 4/14/21. The skin evaluation documented treatment was in progress. Pressure ulcers are injuries to the skin and underlying tissue, primarily caused by prolonged pressure on the skin. They can happen to anyone, but usually affect people confined to bed or who sit in a chair or wheelchair for long periods of time or have compromised nutrition. Pressure ulcers most often develop on skin that covers bony areas of the body, such as the heels, ankles, hips, and tailbone and can develop over hours or days. At stage 3, there is full-thickness skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with limited range of motion received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decline in range of motion. This was evident for 2 (#46, #233) of 5 residents reviewed for positioning and mobility during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) Observation was made, on 6/3/21 at 9:43 AM, of Resident #46 lying in bed with bilateral elbows bent to the chest with the hands up by the shoulders, which were contracted. Resident #46 did not have anything in the palms of the hand and was not wearing any type of hand or arm splint. Resident #46 was observed again on 6/3/21, 6/4/21, 6/7/21 and 6/9/21. Resident #46 was not wearing any type of splints or anything in palms of hands. The surveyor observed a container of arm and hand splints in the resident's closet. Review of Resident #46's medical record on 6/7/21 at 7:40 AM revealed a care plan, has ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance r/t impaired mobility, central cord syndrome with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure resident receiving antipsychotic medication had a gradual dose reduction (GDR) review conducted by licensed pharmacist. This was evident for 1(#9) out 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the survey. The findings include: Risperidone is an antipsychotic mood stabilizer medication prescribed for treatment of acute manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar disorder. www.medicinenet.com A psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. These drugs include, but are not limited to anti-psychotic, anti-depressant, anti-anxiety, and hypnotic medications. On 6/8/21 at 1:18 PM, Resident #9 was selected for Unnecessary Meds, Psychotropic Meds, and Med Regimen Review during the investigation phase of survey. Medical record review on 6/10/21 revealed that Resident #9 was admitted to the facility with a history of Dementia, Parkinson Disease, Schizoaffective Disorders, history of fall and chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-14 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide medically ordered routine dental care to a resident (Resident #1). This was evident in 1 of 60 residents reviewed during the facility's annual survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Dementia. Resident #1's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score was unable to be calculated due to the resident's inability to answer questions in a coherent manner. The BIMS score is an assessment used by long term care facilities to determine how well the brain is functioning or cognition level. Because Resident #1 was unable to be scored on the BIMS test, the facility found it necessary to require a resident representative to assist the resident in making medical and/or financial decisions. Further review of Resident #1's medical records revealed that on February 10, 2021 the resident was ordered to have a dental consultation because of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-14 · tag F0924 — isolated
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to equip and maintain secure handrails on 2 of 2 nursing units observed during the annual survey. The findings include: On 6/11/21 at 12:01 PM, an environmental tour was conducted with the Director of Maintenance and the following observations of handrails, that had been made during the survey, were brought to his attention: A hand rail was missing approximately 2 feet in length in the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The Maintenance Director stated it was from where the previous maintenance staff took out the water fountain. The current Maintenance Director has been in his position since December 2020. The hand rail end cap was missing on the handrail outside of room [ROOM NUMBER], at the corner of the hall that was diagonal to the nurse's station on the second floor. The hand rail end cap was missing outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] and on the corner across from the first floor nursing station. There was a missing hand rail next…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-14 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility employee's training files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all employees received mandatory abuse prevention training. This was evident for 1 out 5 employee's human resource records reviewed during the survey. The finding includes: Facility must provide abuse training to all staff (which includes for the purposes of the training guidance), all facility staff, (direct and indirect care and auxiliary functions) contractors, and volunteers. On 6/10/21 at 9:30 a.m, review of staff member # 12's facility training transcripts revealed this staff member was employed in year 2008 and signed the pledge against abuse policy. Continued record review revealed no evidence that this staff received additional annual or semiannual abuse training from the facility, which is a federal employee requirement for all staff providing direct and indirect resident care for nursing home residents. On 6/7/21 at 10:00 a.m., surveyor conducted interview with ADON who was unable to provide staff members training manuscript to verify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to store linen in an appropriate manner to prevent the spread of infection. This practice was observed on an outside location of the building during the survey process. The findings include: On 9/6/18 at approximately 9:00 AM, the surveyor noted that on the third-floor balcony, outside of the facility's building, there were two rolling racks full of clothing hanging on the racks. Some of the clothes had fallen to the bottom of the rack. Along with the racks of clothing there was a large tiered linen rack with the flaps completely open. On the linen cart was clean folded linen open to the air. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was informed. At 10:15 AM The Corporate Nurse, the Director of Nursing (DON), ADON and staff #9 were on the balcony observing the contents and began removing the items. At approximately 10:30 AM the facility Administrator was interviewed and acknowledged being aware that the clothing and linen had been removed from the laundry room. It is the facility's responsible to protect its…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation the facility staff failed to maintain dignity for Resident #24 while bathing the resident in the resident's bedroom. This was evident for 1 out of 30 residents investigated during the survey process. The findings include: On September 3, 2018 around 10:00 AM, while interviewing residents during the first part of the survey, this writer went to Resident #24 and 25's bedroom door which was closed. The writer knocked on the bedroom door, asking for Resident #25, whose bed is by the window of the room. Staff person #10 answered, come in, you can come in. Upon entrance into the bedroom the writer observed Resident #24 in the first bed near the door. The resident was completely unclothed, exposed to the writer. The Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) was bathing the resident without having pulled the privacy curtain around the resident. The writer stated to the GNA, doesn't the resident have a privacy curtain, noticing the privacy curtain behind the GNA. The GNA stated, oh, I'm sorry. Residents have a right to receive services from the facility that when performed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-09-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medication cart observations and staff interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that the medical records were kept in a confidential manner. This was evident in 1 out of 3 medication carts. The findings include: On 9/4/18 at 10:55 A.M. on the second-floor long term care 200-Unit the surveyor observed on top of the unattended medication cart, the nursing second floor nursing shift to shift report document exposed and was not kept in a confidential manner. This document is used by the facilities nursing staff for assigned nursing task preformed during the nurses shift on assigned residents. On this shift to shift report the surveyor was able to view the resident's names, room numbers for rooms 316A through 233B and vital signs that were visible for public access. The residents' room assignment and personal information was available to be viewed by any observer. On the same day on 9/4/18 at 11:26 A.M., the surveyor interviewed the Certified Medication Aide (CMA), staff member #1, who replied, I was providing care to another resident and forgot to turn…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that glucose test strips and medications used for treatments were properly labeled. This was evident in 2 of 13 storage areas inspected during the survey. The findings include: On 9/11/18 beginning at 1:30 PM, an inspection of areas used to store medications and medical supplies was initiated. This included inspection of 2 medication storage rooms, 1 clean utility room, 4 nurses' medication carts, 4 carts used by Certified Medicine Aides (CMAs), and 2 treatment carts. In the first-floor nurses' medication cart #2, a vial of Glucocard Vital Glucose Test Strips was observed not marked with the date when opened or the discard date. On the side of the vial it stated, Use within 90 days (3 months) of first opening. Once the vial has been opened and test strips have been exposed to air, a gradual process of deterioration begins. It is a minimal standard of nursing practice to label items with the date when opened or the discard date if opening the item changes the expiration date. In the first-floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on meal service observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility staff: 1) failed to demonstrate appropriate hand hygiene practices during meal service involving residents on the 200 Nursing Unit. This was evident for one 1 out of 3 units, and 2) failed to install plumbing in a manner that ensures that food contact equipment is not contaminated in case of a sewage blockage. The findings include: 1) On 9/4/18 at 11:50 AM during a meal observation of the lunch tray service on the 200 Nursing Unit, Geriatric Nursing Assistant's (GNA's) #5, #6, #7, and #8 was observed touching uniformed clothing with hands without washing hands or sanitizing hands before pulling and serving lunch trays from the food cart and delivered the breakfast trays to resident's Rooms #218, 221, 219, 206, 202 and 201. 2) On 9/12/18 at 12:30 PM during the lunch meal observation in the main dining room, the surveyor observed Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #4 touching and pulling his/her nursing uniform top down over their nursing uniform pants and continued pulling resident's lunch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-06-14 · tag F0559 — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide a resident and the resident's responsible party with a written notice and reason for a room change before the resident was moved to a different room. This was evident for 2 (#233, #12,) of 9 residents reviewed for abuse and 1(#330) of 4 residents reviewed for discharge during an annual recertification survey, however the deficient practice affected all residents as the facility staff were not aware of the regulation The findings include: 1) A review of Resident #233's medical record, on 6/10/21 at 11:20 AM, revealed a nurse's note, dated 4/28/21 at 6:42 PM, which documented, resident was transferred from room [ROOM NUMBER]B to 216A. RP (responsible party) made aware of room change. Further review of Resident #233's electronic and paper medical record failed to produce evidence that written documentation was given to Resident #233's responsible party. 2) Medical record review of Resident #12's medical record on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2021-06-14 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 4 (#229, #232, #233, #74) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1a) Review of Resident #229's medical record on 6/8/21 at 7:55 AM revealed a nursing note dated 10/11/20 at 18:47 which documented that Resident #229 was found face down, lying in the hallway, bleeding with a deep laceration to the right side of the nose. Resident #229 was transferred to an acute care facility for treatment. 1b) Continued review of Resident #229's medical record revealed a change in condition note dated 10/12/20 at 6:50 AM which documented that Resident #229 was face down on the floor with a hematoma on the forehead. Resident #79 was sent out to an acute care facility. 1c) Further review of the medical record for Resident #229 revealed a change in condition note dated 11/10/20 at 17:27 documenting that Resident #229 complained of pain in the upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-06-14 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of the bed hold policy upon transfer of a resident to an acute care facility. This was evident for 3 (#229, #232, #233) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1a) Review of Resident #229's medical record on 6/8/21 at 7:55 AM revealed a nursing note, dated 10/11/20 at 18:47 which documented that Resident #229 was found face down, lying in the hallway, bleeding with a deep laceration to the right side of the nose. Resident #229 was transferred to an acute care facility for treatment. 1b) Continued review of Resident #229's medical record revealed a change in condition note dated 10/12/20 at 6:50 AM, which documented that Resident #229 was face down on the floor with a hematoma on the forehead. Resident #229 was sent out to an acute care facility. 1c) Further review of the medical record for Resident #229 revealed a change in condition note dated 11/10/20 at 17:27 documenting that Resident #229 complained of pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-06-14 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of daily staffing records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post the total number and actual hours worked by categories of Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses(LPN), and Certified Geriatric Nurse Aides (GNA) per shift. This was evident on 2 of 2 nursing units observed. The findings include. Observation was made on 6/3/21 at 7:30 AM of the facility lobby area and the bulletin boards on the first floor hallway. There were no nurse staffing schedules posted. Observation was made on 6/3/21 at 9:59 AM of the second floor nursing unit. There was a white dry erase board in the sitting area adjacent from the nurse's station. The board listed the census, date, 6 GNA names and nurse's names. There were no nursing hours documented on the board. There were no other staffing sheets observed on the second floor nursing unit. On 6/3/21 at 10:10 AM the first floor nursing unit was observed. The board listed the census, nurse's names and GNA names, however there were no nursing hours listed. Observation was made on 6/4/21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Crystal SpringsElkins, WV 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glen BurnieGlen Burnie, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At HomewoodBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Long GreenBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at GreenfieldMilwaukee, WI 1 of 5Nella's At Autumn Lake HealthcareElkins, WV 2 of 5Ashbrook Care & Rehabilitation CenterScotch Plains, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Arlington WestBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Ballenger CreekFrederick, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Baltimore WashingtonGlen Burnie, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At BridgeparkBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At CatonsvilleCatonsville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glade ValleyWalkersville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Loch RavenBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At MadisonMadison, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Memorial BridgePenns Grove, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At NorwalkNorwalk, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At OverleaBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At PikesvillePikesville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RuxtonTowson, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Salem CountySalem, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At SouthgateCarneys Point, NJ 2 of 5King David Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBaltimore, MD 2 of 5The Subacute At Autumn Lake HealthcareVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Calvert ManorRising Sun, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chesapeake WoodsCambridge, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chevy ChaseChevy Chase, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Patuxent RiverLaurel, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Perring ParkwayBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RiverviewEssex, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Silver SpringSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Spa CreekAnnapolis, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Summit ParkCatonsville, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VinelandVineland, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VoorheesVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At West HartfordWest Hartford, CT 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare Post-Acute Care CenterBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at BeloitBeloit, WI 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at OceanviewOcean View, NJ 3 of 5Cornell Hall Care & Rehabilitation CenterUnion, NJ

Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ALICE PARENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/01/2014
ALICE BUILDING II, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2014
SCHWARTZ, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
ACCURATE STAFFING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/19/2025
BRAND SONNENSCHINE LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/25/2025
SERASKY PRICE, SHOLOM LEIBIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/15/2021
RIZQUI, IBRAHIMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
STERN, ARYEHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 86%Medicare 7%Other / private 7%

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$379per resident / day
operating cost
$11,515per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$390per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215215. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next