Autumn Lake Healthcare At Voorhees

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

32.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 80.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 90 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: 2613158 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of pertinent facility documents on 09/18/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and procedure to ensure all residents were protected from abuse when a severely cognitively impaired resident (Resident #1) alleged the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA #1) physically abused them, and CNA #1 was taken off the resident's assignment, but remained on that nursing unit assisting other residents as well as having access to Resident #1. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1).On 09/07/2025 at 11:30 PM, Resident #1 put on their call light, and CNA #1 responded to the resident's room. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) heard Resident #1 screaming and entered the resident's room. LPN #1 observed water on the resident's floor, and Resident #1 stated that CNA #1 pulled their hair and beat them up. LPN #1 immediately reported it to the Nursing Supervisor (NS), who removed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  COMPLAINT #2716078 Based on interviews, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation on 3/16/26 and 3/17/26, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete medical record in accordance with acceptable professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1) and was evidenced by the following:Resident #1 was not at the facility at the time of the survey. A closed record review was conducted. A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: fracture of first cervical vertebra, heart failure, and type II diabetes. The comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 1/12/26, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 out of 15, which indicated that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Further review of the MDS indicated that Resident #1 required substantial assistance with toileting hygiene and toilet transfer. A review of Resident #1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-07 · tag F0659 — isolated
  Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that services were delivered by qualified staff with the necessary skills, experience, and knowledge. As a result, care was not provided in accordance with the resident's assessed needs and plan of care. This deficiency was identified in 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1).This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During an interview with the surveyor on 11/07/25 at 11:10 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) explained that the Resident #1's family pays for a private sitter (PS) to be with the resident from 3:00 PM to 8:00 PM, Sunday through Saturday. The facility did not provide any training to the PS before she began working with the resident. The DON reported that the PS is not permitted to provide care such as feeding, bathing, transferring, or assisting with incontinence, and is expected to report any care needs to facility staff. Despite this, the PS has been counseled multiple times for providing care. The DON discussed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one out of three resident (Resident (R) 79) with a Level I PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review), who later was identified with a serious mental disorder, was evaluated through the Level II PASARR process in a total sample of 38 residents. This deficient practice resulted in R79 not being evaluated for and/or provided specialized care and treatment for a serious mental illness. Findings include: Review of a Resident Face Sheet found in R79's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a document titled New Jersey Department of Human Services . Pre- admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 1 Screen. located under the Misc (Miscellaneous) tab dated 9/17/20 indicated the resident was negative for mental health screening. Review of R79s' EMR tab titled Med (Medical) Diag (Diagnosis) indicated the resident was diagnosed with borderline…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe, consistent manner. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/17/24 from 9:40 AM until 10:31 AM, the surveyor observed the following in the presence of the Dietary Director (DD): 1. A rolling rack of plastic bowls was stored in front of the handwashing sink. At that time, a Dietary Aide (DA) retrieved the rack and proceeded to place salad inside of the bowls. When interviewed, the DD stated that since the bowls were stored upside down it did not pose a risk of contamination. 2. In the galley the kitchen: Caribbean Jerk Seasoning, Poultry Seasoning, and Old Bay Seasoning were not labeled with an opened date and a use-by date. DD stated that when the spices were opened they should have been labeled and dated with a use by date. DD then proceeded to place labels on the spices with an opened date of 12/01/23 and an expired date of 05/01/24. When asked how he knew when the spices were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #NJ00158428 Based on observations, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that incontinence care was provided to dependent residents in a timely manner for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #54 and #156) observed for incontinence care on 1 of 2 nursing units (Medbridge) and for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence on 1 of 2 nursing units (Second Floor). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. During an interview with the surveyor on 01/22/24 at 9:40 AM, the Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) #1 stated that the census on the unit was 42 and there were four Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and three nurses present on the unit to provide resident care. On 01/22/24 at 9:44 AM, the surveyors completed an incontinence tour on the Medbridge Unit and observed the following: During an interview with the surveyor on 01/22/24 at 9:44 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 stated that she worked at the facility for eight years and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # NJ 156885, NJ 158428, NJ 159346, NJ 160533, NJ 163074, NJ 163435 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to: a. maintain the required minimum direct care staff-to-resident ratios as mandated by the state of New Jersey and b.) provide adequate staff to ensure all residents were provided with timely incontinent care for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for incontinence care (Resident #154 and Resident #156) on 1 of 2 units (Medbridge) and for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence on 1 of 2 units (Second Floor). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Refer to F677E 1. Reference: New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) memo, dated 01/28/2021, Compliance with N.J.S.A. (New Jersey Statutes Annotated) 30:13-18, new minimum staffing requirements for nursing homes, indicated the New Jersey Governor signed into law P.L. 2020 c 112, codified at N.J.S.A. 30:13-18 (the Act), which established minimum staffing requirements in nursing homes. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and pertinent record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of the narcotic shift count logs were completed in accordance with facility policy and accurately account for and document the administration of controlled medications. This deficient practice was identified on 3 of 3 medication carts and was evidenced by the following: On 1/17/24 at 9:58 AM, the surveyor, interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse #4 (LPN #4) who stated all nurses assigned to carts were responsible for the organization, and maintenance of the medication cart. She further stated that narcotic shift to shift count logs were to be completed by two nurses (the incoming and outgoing nurses) at the same time once they confirmed an accurate count of the narcotics in the cart. She also confirmed that logs should not be missing any documentation, signatures, or have a pre-signed field for future count times. The surveyor, in the presence of LPN #4, then reviewed the Strawbridge nursing unit's medication cart 1 narcotic log binder. The log binder…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications, maintain clean and sanitary medication storage areas, and properly label opened multidose medications. This deficient practice was observed in 3 of 3 observed medication carts on 2 of 2 nursing units and 1 of 1 medication storage rooms and was evidenced by the following: On 1/17/24 at 9:58 AM, the surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse #4 (LPN #4) who was assigned to the [NAME] nursing unit medication cart 1. LPN #4 stated that all nurses assigned to the medication carts were responsible for maintaining the cart and keeping it organized and clean. She further stated that all opened multi-dose medication containers should be labeled with date opened as well as with the resident's name on the actual medication containing device or container and there should be no loose pills in the cart. At that time, the surveyor reviewed [NAME] medication cart 1 in the presence of LPN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appetizing and palatable temperature of food for 1 of 1 lunch meals observed on 1 of 2 nursing units (Medbridge). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/18/24 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor conducted a Resident Council meeting which included five residents (Residents #14, #37, #53, #71, and #74). All five residents informed the surveyor that the food was served cold on all shifts. On 01/23/24 at 11:15 AM, the surveyors informed the Dining Director (DD) that they wanted to observed the lunch meal service for that day including food temperatures. The DD acknowledged the request and stated that the lunch service began at 11:20 AM. On 01/23/24 at 11:20 AM, the [NAME] informed the surveyor that he had already calibrated (procedure used to confirm accuracy) his thermometer prior to the surveyors arrival. The [NAME] then proceeded to obtain food temperatures from the food that was on the steam table. The temperature were recorded as follows:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #NJ00158428 Based on observation, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to honor the recreational needs and preferences of a resident who was not provided with a remote control for their television upon admission to the facility and was not assisted to change the channel to a preferred station. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #155) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/22/24 at 10:21 AM, the surveyors, who were accompanied by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 during an incontinence tour of dependent residents, observed Resident #155 lying in bed awake. Resident #155 immediately stated that he/she had not had a television remote for two to three days. The resident stated that they asked a couple of people, whose names were unknown by the resident, for a television remote control and still had not received one. The resident stated that he/she had to watch nothing but sports during that time. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$84,835 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $84,835 — penalty dated 2025-09-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ