No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Autumn Lake Healthcare At Bridgepark

4017 Liberty Heights Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21207 · For profit - Corporation · 106 certified beds · (410) 542-5306 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 542-5306 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2025Resident-funds citation (F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
2300 Garrison Blvd · (410) 945-6324 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3305 Garrison Blvd · (443) 708-8917 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3309 Garrison Blvd
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.4%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.7%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.3%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.0%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.3%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers11.1%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.2%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.9%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.1%80.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.0%21.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.8%9.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.951.331.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.421.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.6%CMS range 23.5–68.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 8.3–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened18.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 4.5–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.481.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.02
RN hours/ resident / day
1.10
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.56
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.68
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.01
RN hoursweekends
40.4%
Total nursing turnover
41.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 87.4 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.80 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.03 to 1.01 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-13)
30
at the previous standard inspection (2021-11-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

71 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to 1.) provide adequate supervision of a resident identified with inappropriate sexual behavior towards residents and staff resulting in actual harm to Resident #11, and 2.) ensure two-person assistance was provided while providing care to a resident in bed, as required by the resident's care plan. This deficient practice was evident for 2 of 5 residents (#11 and #98) reviewed for accidents during the annual survey.The findings include: 1) On 6/4/25, the surveyor reviewed facility incident reports and medical records for Residents #27 and #11. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia and cognitive impairment. The nursing assessment for Resident #27 dated 6/19/24 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment. A review of the facility reported incident (FRI) MD00193881 revealed that the facility substantiated that Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint, reviews of a medical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the nursing staff failed to: 1) follow a physicians orders for withholding a cardiovascular medication when the pulse rate was less than 100 and document the resident's pulse rate when administering the cardiovascular medication, and 2) correctly document the route the cardiovascular medication should be administered. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed during the complaint survey.The findings include:Review of Complaint 2662089 on 11/13/25 at 6:30 AM revealed a an allegation Resident #1 was not receiving quality of care at the facility.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but not limited to being totally ventilator dependent, tracheostomy, and using a feeding tube for nutrition and hydration. Resident #1 is totally dependent upon the nursing staff for all aspects of his/her care. Resident #1 was sent out to the hospital on [DATE] for facial/head…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation during the initial tour of the facility on 11/13/2025 at 5:35 AM, it was determined that the facility nursing staff failed to maintain the medication carts locked and secure. This was evident for 3 of 4 nursing units observed during a complaint survey.The findings include:During the initial tour of the facility on 11/13/2025 at 5:35 AM, the second-floor nursing unit was observed with one medication cart unlocked. Observations also include a medicine cup, located on top of the unlocked medication cart, with 2 cherry-colored oval tablets in the cup. The medication cart was unattended by any of the nursing staff.During an observation of the fourth-floor nursing unit on 11/13/2025 at 5:45 AM, the nurse surveyor observed 2 medication carts unlocked and unattended by any of the nursing staff.During an observation of the third-floor nursing unit on 11/13/2025 at 5:55 AM, the nurse surveyor observed 2 medication carts unlocked and unattended by any of the nursing staff.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were competent with their skills set. This was evident for 3 (Staff #14, Staff #29, and Staff # 30) of 5 nursing staff evaluated for competency and has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: 1a) Nursing competence is defined by the American Nurses Association as an expected level of performance that integrates knowledge, skills, abilities, and judgment. On 06/09/25 at 08:08 AM, as part of the sufficient and competent nurse staffing task, the surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON) to provide employee files of 5 randomly selected nursing staff. On 06/09/25 at 09:10 AM, the DON provided for Staff #14's employee file, one of the facility's contracted/agency Registered Nurse. On 06/09/25 at 09:15 AM, a review of Staff #14's employee file did not reveal any nursing competencies. The DON reported that she had contacted the staffing agency to request Staff #14 nursing competencies completed. On 06/10/25 at 11:57 AM, an interview with the DON was conducted.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-13 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide 12 hours of in-service training to nurse aides yearly. This finding was evident for 2 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA #15 and GNA #16) of 2 nurse aide employee files reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 06/09/25 at 08:08 AM, as part of the sufficient and competent nurse staffing task, the surveyor reviewed two Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) employee files (GNA #15 and GNA #16). The review of these records failed to show that the two GNAs had 12 hours of in-service education for the year 2024. On 06/09/25 at 09:50 AM, the facility administrator was asked to provide any documentation that indicated that GNA #15 and GNA #16 received in-service education. On 06/10/25 at 11:57 AM, an interview with the DON was conducted. The DON confirmed that GNA #15 and GNA #16 did not have 12 hours of in-service training, and that she had identified the lack of staffing education as a concern in the facility.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to 1.) maintain the facility's floors and resident shower room in a clean and sanitary condition and 2.) failed to ensure privacy for male and female residents who share a joint bathroom. This deficient practice was evident for multiple areas observed for cleanliness and resident privacy during the annual survey. The findings include: 1.) A review of complaint intake MD00208739 on 06/4/25 for Resident #4, reveals that the complainant reported ongoing cleanliness issues at the facility. They described the facility as filthy with trash and toilet paper scattered on the floors. The elevator was noted to be so dirty that the complainant's shoes stuck to the floor. A review of complaint intake MD00202589 on 06/4/25 for Resident #89, reveals that the complainant expressed concerns about the facility's cleanliness and is unclear when the floors were last swept or mopped, or how often the bathroom is cleaned. On 6/4/25 at 7:30AM, upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident#104) out of 17 facility reported investigations, and 2 (Resident #58 and Resident #92) out of 6 residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include:1) A care plan is an outline of nursing care showing all the residents' needs and the ways of meeting the needs. Care plans provide direction for individualized care of the resident. A care plan flows from each resident's unique list of diagnoses and should be organized by the individual's specific needs. It is a dynamic document initiated at admission and subject to continuous reassessment and change by the nursing staff caring for the resident. The care plan typically includes nursing and medical diagnoses, nursing interventions, and outcomes to ensure consistency of care.On 06/11/2025 6:33 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility's reported incident investigation packet for intake MD#00181243 in which the facility reported an unexpected death of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to 1.) ensure that a tube feeding container was labeled 2.) follow professional standards when caring for a resident who had a change in condition. This deficient practice was evident for one resident (Resident #53) out of 9 residents reviewed for tube feedings during the annual survey and one (#87) resident reviewed for nursing standards during the annual survey.The findings include: 1.)Gastrostomy tube (G-tube) is a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications. The most common type is a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube.On 06/04/25 at 07:54 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident #53 was seen sleeping, in bed, with a bottle of enteral feed running at 70 milliliters per hour(mL/hr). The surveyor observed that the enteral feed did not have a name or date on it. The surveyor also observed that the water flush that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observation, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have documented evidence to support that the facility provided an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities. This was evident for 1 (Resident #73) of 3 resident reviewed for activities during the Medicare/Medicaid recertification survey. The findings include: On 06/04/2025 at 10:12 AM, during a family interview with Resident #73's Responsible Party (RP), when she was asked about the resident's activities, she stated that Resident #73 liked listening to music, but the facility was not offering him/her any activity. On 06/04/25 01:59 PM, this surveyor reviewed Resident #73's care plan goal which showed that he/she would accept/participate in one-on-one visits at least 2 times per week and the care plan intervention showed that the facility would provide one-on-one visits 2-3 time a week gospel music, daily bread, television. On 06/05/25 at 07:32 AM, in an interview with the Activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure a resident wore an arm splint as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice was evident for one (# 11) resident reviewed for position and mobility and 1 (Resident #58) of 2 residents reviewed for range of motion during the annual survey. The findings include: A contracture is an abnormal shortening of muscle tissue causing the muscle to be resistant to stretching. Failure to protect the palm of the hand when the hand is contracted can result in injury to the palm of the hand caused by the pressure of fingers/fingernails pressing into the palm of the hand.1.) On 06/04/25 at 10:21AM, the surveyor observed Resident #11 in bed with bilateral upper extremity contractures. No arm splints were observed on the resident or noted anywhere in the resident's room. On 06/04/25 at 02:00 PM, the surveyor made a second observation of Resident #11. No arm splints were observed on the resident or noted anywhere in the resident's room.A review of Resident #11's Treatment Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure a treatment order was in place for a resident with a suprapubic catheter, and 2.) failed to change a resident for extended periods following episodes of incontinence. This deficient practice was evident for two (#4, #47) of two residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence during the annual survey. The findings include: 1.) On 6/4/25 at 11:00PM, during an interview with Resident #4's representative, they expressed concerns regarding the resident's catheter, questioning how often it should be replaced. On 6/6/25 at 8:43AM, a review of Resident #4's treatment administration record revealed a physician's order to change the suprapubic catheter every 28 days and as needed. This order was discontinued on 5/20/25. Further review of the medical record indicated that the resident was discharged to the hospital on 5/19/25 and returned to the facility on 5/22/25. There were no physician orders in place for the suprapubic catheter, although the hospital discharge summary noted the presence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 60 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observations, review of the medical record, and interview with facility staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide residents with respiratory care consistent with professional standards by failing to 1) properly date label oxygen tubing when changed and 2) Change the water in the humidifier. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #10) out of 9 residents on oxygen reviewed during the Medicare/Medicaid recertification survey. The findings include: On 06/04/25 08:07 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident #10 was seen in bed with nasal cannula and oxygen running at around 2 liters. The oxygen humidifier bottle was dated 04/21/2025 and the nasal cannula tubing had no dates. On 06/04/2025 at 8:10 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse LPN#4 was invited for a dual observation, and she confirmed that the nasal tubing was not dated, and the oxygen humidifier bottle was dated 04/21/2025. When she was asked what the process was after changing nasal tubing, she stated that the normal process should have been to date it. When asked how often the water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0836 — isolated
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to comply with State Regulations when the facility failed to provide nursing staff with a minimum of 2 hours of training on cognitive impairment annually. This was evident for 5 (Staff #13, Staff #14, Staff #15, Staff #16, and Staff #17,) of 5 nursing staff evaluated for cognitive impairment training and has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: Maryland state regulations at 10.07.02.10 D. states, Ongoing training in cognitive impairment and mental illness shall be provided annually and consist of, at a minimum of 2 hours for employees who are licensed, certified, or registered under the Health Occupations Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, or who assist residents with activities of daily living. On 06/09/25 at 08:08 AM, as part of the sufficient and competent nurse staffing task, the surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON) to provide employee files of 5 randomly selected nursing staff. On 06/09/25 at 09:10 AM, the DON provided employee files for Staff #13, Staff #14,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented. This was evident for 1) 1 (#94) of 3 residents reviewed for an injury of unknown origin, 2) 1 (Resident #86) out of 2 resident's reviewed for death in the facility, 3) 2 (Resident #33 and #60) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, 4) 1 (Resident #30) of 3 residents reviewed for activities, and 5) 1 resident (Resident#104) out of 17 facility reported investigations reviewed during an annual survey.The findings include:1) Review of Resident #94's medical record on 6/4/25 at 10:21 AM revealed that the resident sustained an injury to his/her left ankle on 10/4/24. An x-ray confirmed a fracture, and the resident was sent to the hospital for further evaluation. During an interview on 6/4/25 at 1:10 PM the DON (Director of Nursing) indicated that the Medical Director determined that the fracture was pathological after the hospital confirmed the fracture on 10/7/24. Further review of Resident #94's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of preferences by not honoring a resident's request for female only caregivers. This was found to be evident for Resident #105 during investigation of facility reported incident MD00186826. The findings include: On 06/11/2025 at 11:00 AM, facility reported incident MD00186826 was reviewed by surveyor. In the report, Resident #105 alleged that a male caregiver had sexually assaulted them while applying barrier cream during incontinence care on 12/15/2022. The facility initiated an investigation and found the alleged incident to be unsubstantiated. Further record review revealed that Resident #105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred to another nursing facility on 2/17/2023. Additional review of facility reported incident MD00186826 on 06/11/2025 revealed that the facility had stated on the Comprehensive & Extended Care Facilities Self-Report Form that the resident, is to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews it was determined that facility staff failed to notify a resident's representative of a change in the resident's medical condition and failed to inform the resident's representative of the resident's transfer to the hospital. This deficient practice was evident for one (#89) resident reviewed for notification of changes during the annual survey. The term resident representative means the following: An individual chosen by the resident to act on behalf of the resident in order to support the resident in decision-making; access medical, social or other personal information of the resident; manage financial matters; or receive notifications. The findings include: Resident #89 was admitted to the facility August 2023 with medical history that includes aphasia ( language disorder that can affect a person's ability to speak, understand, read or write) among other conditions. A review of complaint intake MD00202589 on 06/10/25 at 7:33 AM reveals that the complainant reported not being notified by the facility about a change in Resident #89's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident remained free of abuse. This deficient practice was evident for one (#11) of five residents reviewed for abuse during the annual survey. The findings include: Review of the facility's investigation file related to the facility reported incident MD00208357 and compliant intake MD00208362 on 6/4/25 at 2:45 PM, revealed that the facility substantiated allegations of sexual abuse based on a witness account provided by Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #18. GNA #18 reported that while walking into room [ROOM NUMBER] on 8/2/24 as part of her initial shift rounding, GNA #18 witnessed Resident #27 who is cognitively impaired on their knees next to Resident #11's bed and was touching the resident's genital area. The GNA immediately intervened and redirected Resident #27 out of the room. The GNA reported the incident to her floor nurse as they attended to Resident #11. Resident #11 who is cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility reported incident investigation, review of record and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to 1) report an allegation of abuse in a timely manner to the state agency, immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation was made, and 2) report an injury of an unknown source to the state agency as required. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #106) of 17 residents reviewed for timely reporting an alleged violation, and 1 resident (#94) of 3 residents reviewed for an injury of unknown origin during an annual survey. The findings include:1) On 06/10/2025 at 8:41 AM, review of the investigation report of Facility Reported Incident (FRI), MD#00190620 revealed that on 03/28/2023 at 09:15 AM, Resident #110 reported to the administrator that Resident #106 might have been choked by Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA #21) on 03/27/2023 during the evening shift. On 06/10/2025 at 8:57 AM, further review of the investigation packet showed that on 03/27/2023, Certified Medicine Aide (CMA #32)'s in her statement stated that on that day at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of a facility reported incident it was determined the facility failed to 1) ensure the thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse, and 2) provide residents with psychological evaluations and physician assessments following a substantiated incident of resident to resident sexual abuse. This was evident for 1 (Resident #106) out of 17 residents reviewed for allegations of abuse, and 1 (MD#00193881) of 17 Facility Reported Incidents (FRI) reviewed during the annual survey.The findings include:1) On 06/10/2025 at 8:41 AM, review of the investigation report of Facility Reported Incident (FRI), MD#00190620 revealed that on 03/28/2023 at 09:15 AM, Resident #110 reported to the administrator that Resident #106 might have been choked by Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA #21) on 03/27/2023 during the evening shift. On 06/10/2025 at 11:12 AM, when the surveyor requested copies of employee files/trainings for GNA #21 from the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), she informed this surveyor that GNA #21 was from a nursing agency and added that the facility did not have his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that the required minimum information was provided to the receiving provider upon transfer from the facility. This was evident for 1 (#94) of 3 residents reviewed for an injury of unknown origin. The findings include: A review of Resident #94's medical record on 6/4/25 at 10:21 AM revealed a Change in Condition/Concurrent Review dated 10/4/24 12:53 (12:53 PM) which noted that the resident's left lower extremity was swollen, and left ankle was red and warm to touch. The Physician was contacted and ordered a STAT x-ray to rule out a fracture and an ultrasound to rule out a Deep Vein Thrombosis (blood clot). The Change in Condition form contained a section to document specific information in the event of a hospital transfer. The section was blank. The X-ray report dated 10/5/24 confirmed the resident had fractures of the ankle. A Nursing Note dated 10/6/24 03:13 (3:13 AM) noted that the on-call physician was notified of the results and ordered that the resident be sent to the hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to revise care plans for residents. This was evident for 1 (MD#00207171) out of 17 facility reported investigations, 2 (Resident #100, #27) out of 5 residents reviewed for care plans reviewed during an annual survey.The findings include:1) On 06/09/2025 at 9:48 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility's reported investigation packet for intake MD#00207171 in which the facility had stated that on 06/28/2024, Resident #64 was seen naked with another resident.On 06/09/2025 at 10:30 AM, further review of the investigative packets showed that the facility stated in the final report sent to the state agency that the corrective action to be taken would be to update Resident #64's care plan to reflect his/her wish for companionship with other residents but that his/her interactions would be supervised by staff, that no sexual interactions would take place due to resident's cognitive deficits and provide assistance with resolution as needed.On 06/09/2025 at 10:51 AM, review of the resident's care plan in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a resident (Resident #92) with oral care. This was evident for 1 (MD#00206301) of 46 intakes reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 06/10/2025 at 10:00 AM, a review of confidential complaints reported to the state agency revealed complaint #MD00206301. This complaint alleged that Resident #92 did not receive oral care during their stay at the facility. On 06/10/2025 at 10:20 AM, a review of Resident #92's medical record was conducted. The review revealed that Resident #92 was admitted into the facility with a tracheostomy on 4/3/24 and was discharged to a hospital on 5/31/24. A tracheostomy is a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the neck, called a stoma, through which a tube is inserted into the trachea (windpipe) to provide an airway and facilitate breathing. The review of the care plan failed to mention any intervention for tracheostomy care or oral care. On 06/11/2025 at 9:49 AM, an interview with the Director of Respiratory Therapy (Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate physical therapy services to a resident (Resident #92). This was evident for 1 (MD#00206301) of 46 intakes reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 06/10/2025 at 10:00 AM, a review of confidential complaints reported to the state agency revealed complaint #MD00206301. On 06/11/2025 at 12:10 PM, the complainant was called. S/He alleged that Resident #92 did not receive physical therapy as ordered and as needed. On 06/11/2025 at 01:00 PM, a review of Resident #92's medical record was conducted. The review revealed that the resident had an order to receive physical therapy services 5 to 7 times a week for the recertification period of 4/4/24 to 5/2/24. On 06/11/2025 at 01:10 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to provide physical therapy notes for the month of April 2024. On 06/11/2025 at 02:00 PM, the facility provided physical therapy notes. These documents were reviewed with a physical therapist (Staff #26), and revealed that Resident #92 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to provide needed care to Residents (#9, #78, #75, #83 and #66) to provide the highest practical well-being. The facility staff failed to administer medications to Resident #9 as ordered by the physician, failed to float heels for Resident #78, failed to obtain a neurology consultation for Resident #75, failed to obtain a neurology consultation for Resident #83 and failed to obtain a Heptalogy and GI consultation for Resident #66. This was evident for 5 of 52 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: 1 A. The facility staff failed to administer medication to Resident #9 as ordered by the physician. Medical record review for Resident #9 on 11/2/21 at 1:30 PM revealed on 7/21/21 the physician ordered: Glatopa 40 mgs SQ in the mornings on MWF for MS. Glatopa is a prescription medicine used to treat relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Interview with the resident on 11/2/21 at 11:45 AM revealed the resident stating that she/he does not always get…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide Resident #9 with the prescribed diet as ordered by the physician; failed to obtain weights on Resident # 75 for 5 months, failed to withhold straw for Resident #83 and facility staff failed to thoroughly monitor and add interventions timely when the facility staff documented a significant weight loss for a resident (Resident #77). This was evident for 4 of 7 residents selected for review for nutrition and 4 of 52 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #9 with the prescribed diet as ordered by the physician. Surveyor interview and observation with Resident #9 on 11/4/21 at 8:40 AM revealed the resident not eating breakfast. When questioned, the resident stated that ham was being served and he/she does not eat pork. Observation of the resident's breakfast at that time revealed the resident was served a slice of ham.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to 1. address Consultant Pharmacy Drug Regimen Review in a timely manner for Residents (#9 and #22) and 2. document a monthly Consultant Pharmacy Drug Regimen Review in the resident's chart. This was evident for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication and 2 of 52 residents selected for review during the annual survey sample The findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #9 on 11/3/21 at 8:45 AM revealed on 7/21/21 the physician ordered: Lidocaine patch 4%, apply to left knee topically in the morning for pain and on 7/21/21 ordered: Lidocaine patch 4%, apply to left shoulder topically in the morning for pain. Lidocaine 4% patch can be used for: it is used to stop pain and it is used to treat painful nerve diseases. It is also used to ease long-term pain problems. The recommendation that each patch should be worn for no longer than 12 hours is made because the patch may cause localized skin reactions if used beyond this duration. Lidocaine: Basics, Side Effects & Reviews -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it had been determined that the facility had not implemented infection control practices to prevent the spread of COVID 19 as evidenced by 1. facility staff failing to wear a face mask while working in the facility and providing during patient care (This was observed 3 times during an annual recertification survey) and 2. the facility staff failed to store/ handle dirty linens in a manner that would limit the spread of infections as much as possible and in accordance with the accepted national standard to decrease the spread of any infections (This was observed 1 time during an annual recertification survey). The findings include: 1. The facility staff failing to wear a face mask while working in the facility and providing during patient care. Consistent with the 4/2/2020 CMS guidance, on 4/27/2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published updated guidance which stated, In general, fully vaccinated HCP (health care provider) should continue to wear…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to 1. ensure Resident #83's responsible party (RP) was provided the opportunity to consent to the flu vaccine for Resident #83 and 2. failed to ensure Resident #285 had a representative when signing documents. This was evident for 2 of 2 residents selected for reviewed for dignity and 2 of 52 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to have a resident's responsible party provide consent. Medical record review for Resident #83 on 11/5/21 at 10:43 AM revealed on 12/13/17 and 1/22/18 the resident was assessed by 2 physicians. At that time, it was determined that Resident #83 is unable to: understand and sign admission documents and other information, unable to understand the nature, extent, or probable consequences of the proposed treatment or course of treatment, unable to make rational evaluation of the burdens, risk and benefits of the treatment and is unable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0577 — isolated
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview and observation it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure signage was posted to alert residents and visitors of the location of the survey results. This was evident for 4 out of 4 units. The findings are: This surveyor interviewed members of the resident council (Residents #9, #13, #24, and #40) on 11/4/21 at 11:04 AM. The residents said they were unaware of the survey results or where to find the results. This surveyor toured all 4 floors on 11/5/21 at 1:05 PM and did not see survey book or a sign telling residents where it is located. Staff #18 was interviewed on 11/9/21 at 10:40 AM. The observations were presented to her. Survey book had been pulled to find information regarding a question from the survey team. Signs were not posted prior to the exit conference.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review it was determined the facility staff failed to notify 1. the physician of results of an ammonia level (Resident #75) and 2. the physician and resident's family member of X-ray results (Resident #85). This was evident for 2 of 52 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to notify the physician of results of an ammonia level. Medical record review for Resident #75 on 11/3/21 at 11:30 AM revealed the facility staff obtained an ammonia level on 9/9/21 with the results of 80, normal level is 19-54. Ammonia is predominantly generated in the gut by intestinal bacteria and enzymes and detoxified primarily in the liver. Elevated ammonia levels can indicate liver disease. Further record review revealed the facility staff failed to notify the physician of the laboratory blood results. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Chief Clinical Officer were notified of the concerns on 11/10/21 11:30 AM at exit. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the beneficiary notices and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff could not provide sufficient evidence that the residents are provided the proper notice at the time of discharge regarding Medicare coverage (Resident #4, #139 and #140). This was evident for 3 out of the 3 reviewed for the beneficiary notice task. The findings are: The beneficiary notices for Residents #4, #139, and #140 were requested for review on 11/8/21. The beneficiary notices could be either a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) or an Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN). The NOMNC is provided two days before the discontinuation of therapy services. The ABN is provided if the resident wishes to continue therapy even if Medicare might not cover it. The Administrator (#1) was interviewed on 11/8/21 at 12:37 PM. He could not provide copies of either a NOMNC or ABN for any of the three residents.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the confidentiality of resident's #39 information. This was evident for 1 out of 52 residents that were part of the Annual survey process. The findings include: This surveyor observed on 11/4/21 at 11:22 AM a medication cart across from Unit three nursing station with the computer screen on and resident's #39 medical information visible. Staff members walked by including the Unit Manager and not one staff member closed the screen. The nurse returned to the cart at 11:30 AM and exit out of the computer. I informed the Unit Manager (staff #12) of my observation.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-10 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviewed it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident, and/or their responsible party, received written notification of a transfer to the hospital, including appeal rights and ombudsman contact information (Residents #21, #22 and #77). This was found to be evident for 3 out of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalization during an annual survey. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #21's medical record on 11/2/21 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Resident was discharged from the facility on 10/13/21 to the hospital. Further review of the Resident's medical record failed to reveal any documentation that a notice regarding the transfer had been provided to the resident or the resident's responsible party. Interview with the Acting Director of Nursing on 11/4/21 at 10:45 AM confirmed neither Resident #21 nor their responsible party had been sent a letter that notified them of the transfer to the hospital. 2. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide residents and/or their representative (RP) with the proper paper documentation of the facility's bed hold policy (Resident #21, #22 and #77). This was found evident for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalizations during an annual survey. The findings include: A bed hold policy is written information to the resident or resident representative that specifies the duration that the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. It is given before a nursing facility transfers a resident to a hospital or the resident goes out on therapeutic leave. 1. Review of Resident #21's medical record on 11/2/21 revealed the Resident had an unplanned transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. Further review of the medical record revealed that a copy of the facility's bed hold policy was not given to Resident #21 or their RP. Interview with the Acting Director of Nursing on 11/4/21 at 10:45 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the accuracy of the facility assessments (Resident #60). This was evident for 1 out of the 52 residents reviewed as part of the survey process. The findings are: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned for based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. Resident #60 was interviewed on 11/3/21 at 9:22 AM. The resident stated he/she does not have a catheter but did have one recently. A review of the resident's clinical record revealed that the resident had a catheter on 7/27/21. Further review revealed there was no evidence that the catheter was continued or removed while in the facility. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. The facility failed to have quarterly care plan meetings with resident's responsible party. Review of Resident #21's medical record on [DATE] revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with a diagnosis to include vascular dementia. Vascular dementia is a decline in thinking skills caused by conditions that block or reduce blood flow to various regions of the brain, depriving them of oxygen and. nutrients. During an interview with Resident #21's responsible party (RP) on [DATE] at 8:45 AM, the RP stated the facility used to have care plan meetings every 3 months but they have not had one for the Resident in a long time. Review of the Resident's record on [DATE] confirmed no evidence of care plan meetings with the Resident's RP since [DATE]. The facility failed to hold a quarterly care plan meeting in April, July and [DATE]. Interview with the Social Worker on [DATE] at 1:40 PM revealed the facility is to hold care plan meetings every 3 months and the last care plan meeting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications within 1-hour time frame in accordance with professional standards for Resident #79. This was evident for 1 of 52 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: On 11/2/21 at 8:45 AM, an interview conducted with Resident #79, revealed Resident #79 had been alert and oriented to person, place, and time. Resident #79 expressed concern that he/she had been receiving his/her medications late. On 11/3/21 at 11:10 AM, observation on Unit 3 revealed Resident #79 standing at the nursing station requesting his/her 9 AM medications. The medications which had been schedule for 9 AM was administered at the nursing station at 11:10 AM. On 11/4/21 at 1:30 PM a record review of Resident #79's medication administration audit for September and October 2021, revealed Resident #79 had been receiving his/her medications late on a regular basis. In 9/2021, the following medications had been administered outside the 1-hour time frame: On 9/6/21 -Keppra 500 mg 3 tablets by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on complaint, reviews of medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an ongoing resident centered activities program for 1 (Resident #37) of 52 residents reviewed for activities during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: During 2020 and 2021 the facility has had to take mitigating actions to prevent the spread of the COVID19 virus. At times, residents have had to stay in their rooms and were not allowed to attend group activities. To help prevent residents from suffering isolation, an implementation of a resident centered activities care plan may help prevent this isolation from occurring. The facility activities programs can help residents during these times. In an interview with Resident #37 on 11/08/21 at 11:51 AM, Resident #37 complained that the facility does not allow residents to have access tot the Internet nor does the facility have the local news paper delivered to the facility. The resident complained that he/she does have anything to do while residing in the facility. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures ulcers and arterial wounds (Resident #10 and #21). This is evident for 2 of 52 residents reviewed during an annual survey. A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according the their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II ( superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III ( full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and / or eschar in the wound bed). The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #10's medical record on 11/5/21 revealed the Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint, reviews of a medical record, and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to obtain podiatry consultation for Resident #37 as ordered by the physician. This was evident for 1 of 52 residents selected for review during an annual survey. The findings include: In an interview with Resident #37 on 11/08/21 at 11:51 AM, Resident #37 came into the conference and approached the nurse surveyor with a complaint that he/she has not been seen by a Podiatrist since being admitted to the facility. Medical record review for Resident #37 on 11/08/21 at 1:30 PM revealed Resident #37 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 11/04/2020, Resident #37's physician wrote an order instruction the nursing staff to obtain a podiatry consult as needed. Further review revealed an endocrinology consult, dated 09/30/21, requesting the facility staff to please arrange for a podiatry appointment. As of 11/09/21, no podiatry appointment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Resident #83 received restorative nursing program (RNP) as ordered by the physical therapist and speech language pathologist in conjunction with the physician. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents selected for review of range of motion and 1 of 52 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: Restorative nursing is person-centered nursing care designed to improve or maintain the functional ability of residents, so they can achieve their highest level of well-being possible. It is a different way of looking at the care that is regularly given. A restorative nursing program has nursing interventions that promote the resident ' s ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible. Restorative nursing program together with therapy (physical, occupational or speech) because restorative programs build from the base of progress made in therapy. 1 A. The facility staff failed to provide restorative nursing program for Resident #83. Medical record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and observations, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide fall mats next to the bed of Residents #75, 78 and #81. This was evident for 3 of 52 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Fall mats are made from high-impact foam and are designed to help prevent injury from potential falls and are usually placed next to the bed where most falls occur. 1. The facility staff failed to provide fall mats next to the bed of Resident #75 as ordered by the physician. Medical record review for Resident #75 on 11/3/21 at 10:45 AM revealed on 9/2/15 the physician ordered: fall mat, both side of the bed, when in bed. Surveyor observation of the Resident #75 on 11/2/21 at 9:00 AM, 11/3/21 at 8:45 AM, 11/4/21 at 8:30 AM and 11/5/21 at 8:00 AM revealed the resident in bed; however, the facility staff failed to apply fall mat on either side of the as ordered by the physician. 2. The facility staff failed to place fall mats next to the bed of Resident #78 as ordered by the physician. Medical record review for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Residents #9 and #57 were provided pain medication when requested. This was evident for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for pain and 2 of 52 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure pain medication was available and administered to Resident #9 when requested. Medical record review for Resident #9 on 11/3/21 at 9:30 AM revealed on 7/21/21 the physician ordered: Tramadol 50 milligrams by mouth, 2 tablets every 6 hours as needed for severe pain, 7-10. Tramadol is used to help relieve moderate to moderately severe pain. Interview with Resident #9 on 10/4/ 21 at 10:00 AM revealed the resident stated that he/she requested the Tramadol early in the morning. The resident stated he/she was informed by the facility staff that there was no medication available. Interview with the staff #17 at that time revealed that the sticker should have been pulled and sent to the pharmacy for a refill. The medications are supplied…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to complete the Dialysis record communication sheet and obtain post dialysis weights and vital signs for Resident #47. This is evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis during the annual survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #47's medical record on 11/3/21 at 7:20 AM revealed the resident receives dialysis treatments three times a week on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. Dialysis is a treatment that filters and purifies the blood using a machine. This helps keep your fluids and electrolytes in balance when the kidneys can't do their job. On 11/4/21 at 11:30 AM interview with the United manager (staff #12) revealed that dialysis residents are sent to an outside facility for dialysis treatment and that the outside facility does not have access to the residents' electronic medical record. Resident information is communicated to the dialysis center by completing the Dialysis Communication Form which is sent with the Residents to dialysis. Further review of Resident #47's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure medications were administered within ordered parameters. This was evident for 2 (#5 and #9) out of 7 residents reviewed for medications. This was evident for 2 of 5 residents selected for review of unnecessary medications and 2 of 52 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings are: 1. A review of resident #5's clinical record revealed the resident was ordered Clonidine 0.1 mg by mouth two times a day for hypertension hold if systolic [top number of blood pressure] is less than 100 or pulse is less than 60. A review of the November Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident had a blood pressure of 96/56 on 11/8/21 at 5:00 PM and was administered the medication instead of it being held per the physician's order. Staff #18 was interviewed on 11/9/21 at 10:40 PM. She was informed of the medication being administered outside of parameters. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #9 was free from unnecessary medications.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and observation of medication administration, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain an error rate below 5%. Observation of medication administration resulted in an error rate of 10.26%. This was evident for 2 of 4 (#33 and #13) residents observed and 4 of 39 opportunities for error. The findings include: Error 1: The facility staff failed to administer a medication as ordered by the physician. Medical record review for Resident #33 on 11/4/21 at 12:30 PM revealed on 5/5/20 the physician ordered: Cholecalciferol 2000 UT, 1 tablet by mouth 1 time a day as a supplement. Cholecalciferol is vitamin D3. Vitamin D helps the body absorb calcium. Cholecalciferol is used as a dietary supplement in people who do not get enough vitamin D in their diets to maintain adequate health. Observation of medication pass on 11/4/21 at 8:45 AM revealed staff #16 failed to administer the medication as ordered by the physician. Error 2: The facility staff failed to administer a medication as ordered by the physician. Medical record review for Resident #33 on 11/4/21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to properly store medications in a locked compartment that were only accessible to authorized staff. This was observed on two different nursing units during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1) During an observation of the facility on 11/10/21 at 5:40 AM, the nurse surveyor observed an unlocked an unattended medication cart, on the fourth floor, in the vicinity of the nurse's station. A medication cart houses Resident's medications that can be wheeled to each resident's room. A medication cart may have, but is not limit to, containing injectable medications, oral medications, and scheduled II (or pain) medications 2) During an additional observation of the facility on 11/10/21 at 5:43 AM, the nurse surveyor observed an unlocked an unattended treatment cart located in the vicinity of the third-floor elevator. A treatment cart contains medications, lotions and supplies that the nursing staff may use when assisting a physician with or providing wound care to residents.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-10 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain laboratory specimens as ordered by the physician for Residents #66, #75, #83 and #85. This was evident for 4 of 52 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to obtain laboratory blood test for Resident #66 as ordered by the physician. Medical record review for Resident #66 on 10/18/21 at 11:45 AM the resident had an ammonia level obtained with the result of 62, normal 19-54. Ammonia is a nitrogen waste compound that is normally excreted in the urine. An elevated blood ammonia level is an excessive accumulation of ammonia in the blood. An elevated blood ammonia level occurs when the kidneys or liver are not working properly, allowing waste to remain in the bloodstream. Further record review revealed the resident was to have another ammonia level obtained on 10/25/21; however, the facility staff failed to obtain the ammonia level as ordered by the physician.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-10 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on complaint, reviews of a medical record, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide dental services for a resident (Resident #22). This was evident for 1 out of 52 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: In an interview with Resident #22's responsible party on 11/03/21 at 10:29 AM, Resident #22's family member stated that he/she was unable to look into Resident #22's mouth and did not recall the last time Resident #22 was seen by a dentist. Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed a physician order, date 09/08/21, that instructed the nursing staff to obtain a dental consult annually and as needed. Interview with the Assistant Director of the Nursing (ADON) on 11/08/21 at 08:54 AM, the ADON stated and confirmed that Resident #22 has not been seen by the facility dentist since being admitted in 2016. The ADON also stated that the 09/08/21 order to see a dentist was just written after Resident #22 was readmitted from the hospital in September 2021.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain the medical record for Residents #81 and #184 in the most accurate and complete form. This was evident for 2 of 52 residents selected for review during an annual survey. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to maintain the medical record for Resident #81 in the most complete and accurate form. The medical record forms a permanent account of the care a resident has received. The clarity and accuracy of the medical record is paramount for effective communication between healthcare professionals and residents. The maintenance of good medical records ensures that a resident's assessed needs are met comprehensively. Medical record review for Resident #81 on 11/4/21 at 11:48 AM revealed that the physician completed a MOLST on 10/19/21. At that time, the MOLST revealed- Part A- Certifications for the basis of these orders and the physician documented: the resident's surrogate as per the authority granted by the Health Care Decisions Act. It was also revealed on the MOLST…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in safe operating condition. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: 1. On 11/5/21 at 10:10 AM observation of the facility's kitchen with the Dietary Manger revealed a non-operational hot water faucet handle. The hand sink is located on the kitchen's tray line. This was the closest hand sink available to the 3 staff working on the tray line at the time of observation. 2. The 2 compartments sink; hot water faucet had a steady drip and would not turn off completely to stop the flow of hot water. 3. The wall by the exit door had peeling paint. 4. The floor outside the utility closet had an area of missing tile. These concerns were discussed with the Director of Nursing and Administrator during the exit conference on 11/5/21.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-11-29 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) provide a written notice for emergency transfers to the resident and/or the resident representative, and 2) ensure the local ombudsman was notified of a facility initiated resident discharge or transfer. This was found to be evident for 6 out of 46 (Residents #36, #39, #18, #64, #26, #70) residents reviewed for a facility-initiated transfer during an annual re-certification survey. The findings include: 1. A medical record review for Resident #36 was conducted on 11/27/18. Review of the physician order written on 4/1/2018, revealed that Resident #36 had a change in their medical condition that required an immediate transfer to an acute care hospital for further evaluation. Review of the medical record failed to reveal a written notice for emergency transfers to the resident, resident representative and the ombudsman. 2. A medical record review for Resident #39 was conducted on 11/27/18. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-11-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide Residents #18, #36 and Resident #39 with services to maintain/attain the highest level of mobility. The facility staff failed to apply splints as ordered by the physician. This was evident for 3 of 46 residents selected for review during the annual re-certification survey. The findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #18 revealed on 10/19/18 the physician ordered: Bilateral leg braces on for 24 hours daily; Skin check every 2 hours; If any skin tissue, stop the braces and resume when area is healed; Remove for ADL's; Every shift for contracture management. A splint/boot or brace are devices used for holding a part of the body stable to decrease pain and prevent further injury. Splints support and protect injured soft tissue and can also reduce pain, swelling, and muscle spasm. Surveyor observation of Resident #18 on 11/19/18 at 8:30 AM, 11/27/18 at 10:30 AM, and 11/28/18 at 1:30 PM, revealed Resident #18 was in his/her room in bed, however, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-11-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation during the initial tour of the main kitchen it was determined the facility staff failed to 1. discard expired food, date and label food stored in the walk-in refrigerator, 2. properly label and store open containers in dry storage and throughout the kitchen, and 3. maintain a clean environment. The findings include: Observation was made during the initial tour of the kitchen on 11/19/18 at 7:35 AM of the walk-in refrigerator with the following concerns identified: 1) A portable rack with 2 large containers of Iced tea and fruit punch covered with plastic not labeled or dated with the date prepared. 2) On a storage shelf there was a tray containing pudding in dishes that were not labeled or dated as to when prepared or to be used by. 3) A container of opened mandarin oranges with no date indicating when opened. 4) A whipped topping container and a bottle of syrup with no expiration dates. 5) 2 boxes of juice cups with no expiration dates on the juice containers. 6) A carton of 6 eggs with no expiration date. 7) A box with 10 Cantaloupe dated 10/25/18 which were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-11-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to keep the air intake unit in the main kitchen in a clean and safe operating condition. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen. The findings include: Observation was made on 11/19/18 at 7:35 AM of the air intake unit in the main kitchen. The front of the unit appeared dirty with dust, paper and other debris that was stuck to the grate and appeared to be occluding several of the holes in the grate. There was very little force to the air coming through the vents. In an interview with the Maintenance Director on 11/20/18 at 8:25 AM surveyor requested the cleaning schedule for the air intake unit. The Maintenance Director stated that it is done monthly. When asked for a schedule or record of the monthly cleaning he stated there is no book he just does it monthly and in fact it was on the schedule for that day. In a follow-up visit to the kitchen on 11/20/18 at 9:10 AM the Maintenance Director was observed cleaning and changing the filters in the unit. Following the cleaning there was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a resident's wishes to obtain a laboratory test. This was evident for 1 (Resident #82) of 4 residents reviewed for choices during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #82's MOLST form on 11/19/18, revealed that Resident #82's health care agent wanted Resident #82 to be a full code and also wanted all aspects of life sustaining treatment to be performed including any medical testing indicated to diagnose and/or treat a medical condition. On 10/17/18, Resident #82 was admitted to the facility hospice provider. Further review of Resident #82's medical record revealed a pharmacy consultant request, dated 10/30/18, requesting Resident #82's physician to order a Vitamin D level to check Resident #82's Vitamin D replacement therapy. Resident #82 was receiving Vitamin D as a supplement. On 11/01/18, Resident #82's physician disagreed with the facility pharmacy consultant and indicated the reason for not obtaining a Vitamin D level for Resident #82…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-29 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident complaint, reviews of administrative records including a resident's personal funds records, individual resident account statements, transaction reports, transaction receipts, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a system that ensures a full and complete accounting of a resident's personal monies entrusted to this facility. This was evident for 1 (Resident #55) of 1 resident reviewed for personal property during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: In an interview with Resident #55 on 11/19/18 at 8:10 AM, Resident #55 stated that s/he does not get enough money. In an interview with the facility director of nursing (DON) on 11/27/18 at 02:29 PM, the DON stated that the facility does not have a business office manager. In an interview with Employee #21 on 11/28/18 at 08:04 AM, Employee #21 stated that resident money and resident balance sheets come from the corporate offices in New York. A review of Resident #55's cash withdrawal receipts from 07/01/18 thru 09/19/18 revealed Resident #55 had a -$51.98…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility administrative records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the facility administrator. This was evident for 1 (Resident #195) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: A review of the facility reported incident MD00126351, revealed documentation of an allegation of staff to resident abuse involving Resident #195 that occurred on 05/05/18. The facility documentation indicated the facility initiated an investigation into the alleged staff to resident abuse on 05/07/18. In an interview with Employee #19 on 11/21/18 at 7 AM, Employee #19 stated s/he witnessed the 05/05/18 incident and stated that the local police had been notified and came to the facility to investigate the incident. Employee #19 stated that he documented the incident on the daily security form but also stated that this form is not provided to the facility administrative staff. Employee #19 also stated that s/he did not speak to anyone about the incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, reviews of a medical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement a care plan for a resident who smokes. This was evident for 1 (Resident #89) of 2 residents reviewed for smoking during an annual re-certification survey. The findings include: During an observation of the smoking area on 11/26/18 at 09:05 AM, Resident #89 was observed outside smoking. A review of Resident #89's medical record failed to reveal an updated safe smoking assessment and a care plan for safe smoking. Resident #89's medical record did have an admission smoking assessment completed on 10/27/18 but Resident #89 was receiving a medicated smoking cessation patch at that time. Resident #89 medicated smoking cessation patch was discontinued in early November 2018. Resident #89's 10/27/18 smoking assessment indicated that he/she was not allowed to smoke. A review of the facility smoking policy manual, which is kept in close proximity to the smoking area, revealed a list of all smokers in the facility but failed to list Resident #89 as an identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation during a medication pass, it was determined the nurse failed to follow standards of practice regarding medication preparation and poured an excess of dispensed medication back into the medication container. This was observed one time during a medication pass observation. The findings include. During the observation of the medication administration on 11/21/18 at 10:00 AM Employee #10 was observed measuring Resident #67's Keppra (seizure medication) into a medication cup and then pouring the excess back into the original bottle twice until the desired amount was obtained. The Director of Nursing was informed of the findings on 11/21/18. No evidence to dispute this finding was presented to the team prior to exit.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-29 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, reviews of a medical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to obtain an eye consultation. This was evident for 1 (Resident #89) of 1 resident reviewed for communication difficulty and/or sensory problems during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: In an interview with Resident #8 on 11/19/18 at 12:10 PM, Resident #89 stated that he/she needed to see an eye doctor for poor vision. Review of Resident #89's medical record revealed a physician order, dated November 2018, instructing the nursing staff to obtain an Optometry consult as needed. Further review of Resident #89's medical record revealed a social service note indicating a care plan conference had been held on 11/08/18 and Resident #89's family member had requested the facility staff to obtain an vision consult for Resident #89. In an interview with the facility social worker on 11/27/18 at 10 AM, the facility social worker stated that Resident #89 had not been seen by an eye doctor and that an appointment had not been scheduled.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medication by failing to ensure that a psychotropic medication had an adequate indication for use. This was evident for 1 (Resident #89) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #89's medical record revealed a physician order, dated October 2018, instructing the facility nursing staff to obtain a psychiatric assessment as needed and to administer an antipsychotic medication every evening for the indication of mood disorder. A review of Resident #89's physician assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #89 to be calm, cooperative, with an appropriate mood, and able to follow commands. Resident #89's physician assessment dated [DATE] indicated that psychiatry was onboard assessing Resident #89. Further review of physician assessments, dated 11/19/18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) ensure the residents' behaviors were monitored and recorded routinely, and 2) to conduct behavior monitoring for a resident receiving an psychotropic medication. This was evident for 2 (Resident #87 and #43) out of the 5 residents selected for a review for unnecessary medications during an annual recertification survey. The findings are: 1) A review of Resident #87's clinical records revealed that the resident was being administered Remeron 45 mg (an anti-depressant), Depakote delayed release 125 mg to treat a behavioral issue, and Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) 50 mg twice a day. A form or log to monitor the specific behaviors these medications were prescribed for was not in the chart. A review of the care plans revealed that the care plan for depression included an intervention to Monitor/document/report to Nurse/MD s/sx [signs and symptoms] of depression, including: hopelessness, anxiety, sadness, insomnia, anorexia, verbalizing, negative statements, repetitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the treatment and medication carts were locked and secured. This was true for 2 out of 4 nursing units. The findings are: 1. Surveyor observed an unlocked treatment cart on 11/21/18 at 9:10 AM in front of room [ROOM NUMBER]. Inside the treatment cart were several creams and ointments. The items included were Lanolin (skin protectant), Metaphen (anti-infective ointment), Santyl (a debriding enzyme), and Nitro Bid ointment (nitroglycerin). Two nurses and the unit manager were informed on 11/21/18 at 9:15 AM. The treatment cart was then locked. 2. During an observation of the 400's-nursing hall on 11/29/18 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor observed a medication cart unlocked outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. There were no staff. One resident (#43) was sitting in a wheelchair near the unlocked medication cart. Employee #15 was in the lobby area with his back to the medication cart, looking out the window and talking on a cell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-29 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, reviews of a medical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to obtain dental services for a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #55) of 1 resident reviewed for dental services during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: A review of Resident #55's medical record revealed a physician order, dated 10/26/17, instructing the nursing staff to obtain a dental consult as needed. Further review of Resident #55's medical record failed to reveal any documentation a dental consult had been offered or obtained since Resident #55 was admitted to the facility. A review of Resident #55's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #55 had all of his/her teeth. During an observation of Resident #55 on 11/19/18 at 8:07 AM, Resident #55 was observed with some missing teeth to his/her right upper ridge with several discolored teeth. In an interview with Employee #7 on 11/27/18 at 10:34 AM, Employee #7 confirmed Resident #55 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-29 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident complaint, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility therapy staff failed to evaluate and take steps to reassess a resident's wheelchair. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) of 1 resident reviewed for rehabilitation and restorative nursing services during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: In an interview with Resident #6 on 11/29/18 12:25 PM, Resident #6 stated that s/he was currently having problems with his/her wheelchair when ambulating throughout the facility. Resident #6 stated that his/her arms were hitting the backrest poles when trying to wheel himself/herself around the facility. Resident #6 stated that s/he received the wheelchair approximately two years ago and that his/her weight had increased several pounds since being originally fitted for the wheelchair. Resident #6 stated that s/he had difficulty sitting in an upright position in his/her wheelchair due to a previous injury and surgical condition. Review of Resident #6's medical record failed to reveal that a follow-up wheelchair sitting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on reviews of a medical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate medical record by not including documentation from the facility hospice service provider in the medical record. This was evident for 1 (Resident #82) of 2 residents reviewed for hospice services during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #82's medical record on 11/21/18 revealed Resident #82 was admitted to the facility hospice services provider on 10/17/18. Further review of Resident #82's medical record failed to reveal any hospice documentation of care in Resident #82 medical record. In an interview with the facility social worker on 11/21/18 at 10:00 AM, the facility social worker stated that s/he was unable to find any of the hospice documentation in Resident #82's medical record.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on administrative record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to track and monitor a resident with an infection upon admission. This was evident for 1 (Resident #193) of 2 residents reviewed for infections during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: During an interview with the corporate infection control practitioner on 11/29/18 at 10:52 AM, the corporate infection control practitioner stated that all residents admitted with an infection and receiving antibiotics from the hospital are placed on a surveillance list that monitors each residents progress. Reviews of Resident #193 medical record revealed Resident #193 was admitted in October from the hospital with an infection and was receiving intravenous antibiotics through a large bore central line. The corporate infection control practitioner reviewed each of the facility nursing unit documents to see if Resident #193 was on the list that the staff were monitoring for infections. The corporate infection control practitioner indicated there were no records Resident #193 had been monitored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-29 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, reviews of a medical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to identify a resident as a smoker, assess the resident to be a safe smoker, implement a care plan for smoking, and update the facility list of smokers. This was evident for 1 (Resident #89) of 2 residents reviewed for smoking during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: During an observation of the smoking area on 11/26/18 at 09:05 AM, Resident #89 was observed outside smoking. A review of Resident #89's medical record failed to reveal an updated safe smoking assessment and a care plan for safe smoking. Resident #89's medical record did have an admission smoking assessment in October 2018 but Resident #89 was receiving a medicated smoking cessation patch at that time. Resident #89's medicated smoking cessation patch was discontinued in early November 2018. A review of the facility smoking policy manual, which is kept in close proximity to the smoking area, revealed a list of all smokers in the facility but failed to list Resident #89 as an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-11-10 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility records and an interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to provide revise and document an accurate up-to-date facility-wide assessment annually. This was identified during an annual recertification survey. This has the potential to affect all residents within the facility. The findings include: A facility-wide assessment is conducted to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The assessment is to include the care required by the resident population considering the types of diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, overall acuity, and other pertinent facts that are present within that population. A copy of the Facility Assessment was requested during the survey on 11/05/21. Review of the Facility assessment on 11/05/21, revealed the facility assessment was reviewed was on 06/14/21. The facility director of nurses provided a sign-in sheet that indicated the facility assessment was reviewed and approved by the facility quality assurance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2021-11-10 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to post a staffing assignment that was complete. This was evident for 1 out of the 4 nursing units. The findings include: The survey team observed on 11/5/21 at 9:00 AM and on 11/8/21 at 1:15 PM that the fourth-floor nursing unit did not have required information on the staff assignment board. The assignments for the nurses and the Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) were not posted. Residents would not know which nurse and which GNA would be assigned to them. Staff #18 was interviewed on 11/9/21 at 11:20. She stated she understood the findings.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Crystal SpringsElkins, WV 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glen BurnieGlen Burnie, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At HomewoodBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Long GreenBaltimore, MD 1 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at GreenfieldMilwaukee, WI 1 of 5Nella's At Autumn Lake HealthcareElkins, WV 2 of 5Ashbrook Care & Rehabilitation CenterScotch Plains, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Arlington WestBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Ballenger CreekFrederick, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Baltimore WashingtonGlen Burnie, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At CatonsvilleCatonsville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Glade ValleyWalkersville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Loch RavenBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At MadisonMadison, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Memorial BridgePenns Grove, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At NorwalkNorwalk, CT 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At OverleaBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At PikesvillePikesville, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RuxtonTowson, MD 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Salem CountySalem, NJ 2 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At SouthgateCarneys Point, NJ 2 of 5King David Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterBaltimore, MD 2 of 5The Subacute At Autumn Lake HealthcareVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Alice ManorBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Calvert ManorRising Sun, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chesapeake WoodsCambridge, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Chevy ChaseChevy Chase, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Patuxent RiverLaurel, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Perring ParkwayBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At RiverviewEssex, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Silver SpringSilver Spring, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Spa CreekAnnapolis, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At Summit ParkCatonsville, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VinelandVineland, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At VoorheesVoorhees, NJ 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare At West HartfordWest Hartford, CT 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare Post-Acute Care CenterBaltimore, MD 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at BeloitBeloit, WI 3 of 5Autumn Lake Healthcare at OceanviewOcean View, NJ 3 of 5Cornell Hall Care & Rehabilitation CenterUnion, NJ

Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BRIDGEPARK REALTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2018
SCHWARTZ, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2018
BHARAJ, NARENDERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2018
LOGAN, EMILYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
ACCURATE STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2018
BP CAPITALOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2018
BRAND SONNENSCHINE LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2018
MEISELS, MORRISIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2018
STERN, ARYEHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2018
STERN, BEZALELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.1M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 9%Other / private 9%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$498per resident / day
operating cost
$15,133per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$490per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215195. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next