Autumn Lake Healthcare At Salem County
438 Salem-Woodstown Road, Salem, NJ 08079 · For profit - Individual · 116 certified beds · (856) 935-6677 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.7% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.4% | 4.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 12.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 2.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.3% | 8.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.5% | 18.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.8% | 5.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.5% | 15.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.7% | 12.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.5% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.9% | 80.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.9% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.1% | 8.1% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.77 | 2.07 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.92 | 1.11 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 156 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 74.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.2%CMS range 42.7–57.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.7%CMS range 9.6–16.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 74.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 4.5–11.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.24 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 105.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.13 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.13 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
COMPLAINT# 3043799, 3045753 Based on interviews, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation on 6/22/26, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice when they: a) failed to implement Provider's verbal wound treatment order for Nystatin and b) transcribe the verbal order for Nystatin onto the resident's Treatment Administration Record (TAR). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1), and was evidenced by the following: Resident #1 was not at the facility at the time of the survey. A closed record review was conducted. According to the admission Record, Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to: encephalopathy (brain dysfunction), cachexia (a condition that causes significant weight loss and muscle loss), and hyperlipidemia. A review of Resident #1's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 3/19/26, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 5 out of 15, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Intake ID: 2636901Based on interviews, review of closed medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to perform an initial full body skin assessment and implement timely interventions for a resident upon admission to the facility in accordance with the facility Skin Assessment Policy to prevent altered skin integrity.This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure injury prevention and was evidenced by the following:On 10/23/25 at 10:28 AM, the surveyor reviewed the closed electronic medical record for Resident #1.A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included but were not limited to; aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting right dominant side, other abnormalities of gait (manner of walking) and mobility, type 2 (two) diabetes (the body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was clean and staff performed handwashing between glove use and task changes. These failures had the potential to affect 103 residents who consumed food prepared by the facility's kitchen.Findings include: During observation of the kitchen on 08/04/25 at 10:02 AM, dust was noticed on the potholder above the steam table where meals were served and on the ceiling around the vent areas above the sink and shelving. During observation on 08/06/25 at 11:56 AM, lunch was served from the steam table that sat directly beneath the potholder that had dust on it. And staff were observed to use tongs that had been hanging on the potholder. Also, the trays and plates were set up under the vent area where dust was hanging from the ceiling. During the meal service on 08/06/25, the following was observed: At 11;:6 AM, Cook1 was observed to take off gloves and went over to the stove and touched the knob on the front of the stove. Cook1 went to the sink and started grabbing utensils that hung above the sink…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the dumpsters' lids were closed, the plugs were in place, and used gloves and debris was picked up off the ground. This failed practice had the potential to allow trash and animals to enter and leave the dumpster and cause sanitary issues.Findings include: Observation of the dumpster on 08/04/25 at 10:10 AM, revealed two dumpsters for refuse. Both dumpsters' lids were open and when the dietary Director (DM) shut the lids a liquid substance splashed on the DM. There were gloves and other debris lying on the ground around the dumpsters. Neither dumpster had plugs in the holes at the bottom of the container. During an interview on 08/04/25 at 10:10 AM, The DM was asked whose responsibility it was to clean up the area and maintain the dumpsters. The DM stated the maintenance department. During an interview on 08/07/25 at 12:22 PM, the Maintenance Director (MD) stated it was maintenance responsibility. Review of the facility policy titled, Preventive Maintenance Program dated 12/28/22 revealed, Policy: A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to assess one resident (Resident (R) 7) of 33 sampled residents to self-administer medications prior to leaving medications at the bedside. This had the potential for the resident not to receive their ordered medications.Findings include: During an observation on 08/04/25 at 11:26 AM, an inhaler and a bottle of nose spray were sitting on the bedside table. The resident was asked why they were there. R7 stated, I need to use them. Review of R7's undated admission Record found in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and shortness of breath. Review of R7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/11/25 and found in the EMR under the MDS tab, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained when he laid in bed with his backside exposed to anyone walking in the hallway outside of his room for one resident (Resident (R) 102) out of a total sample of 33 residents. This failure had the potential to cause distress to the resident and other residents and visitors who might witness the exposure.Findings include:Review of R102's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy.Review of Evaluations tab of the EMR revealed R102 scored 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 07/25/25, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment.During an observation on 08/05/25 at 8:30 AM, R102's room door was fully open with R102 lying in the far bed on his side facing away from the door. R102 wore a gown, tied at the neck and open in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident-to-resident abuse for two residents of three residents (Resident (R8 and R55) reviewed for abuse out of a sample of 33 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R8's ''admission Record,'' located in the ''Profile'' tab of the EMR, revealed R8 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and other schizophrenia. Review of R8's annual ''Minimum Data Set (MDS)'' with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/21/25 revealed he scored 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating no cognitive impairment. 2. Review of R55's ''admission Record,'' located in the ''Profile'' tab of the EMR, revealed R55 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. Review of R55's quarterly ''Minimum Data Set (MDS)'' with an Assessment Reference…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to monitor target behaviors for the use of Risperdal (an antipsychotic medication) for one of five residents (Resident (R)5) reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total sample of 33. This had the potential for R5 to receive medication without being assessed if behaviors had improved or declined. Findings include: Review of R5's undated Resident Face Sheet, found in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia. Review of R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/30/25 and located in the EMR indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six out of 15, which indicated R5 was severely cognitively impaired. The assessment indicated the resident was not exhibiting any behavioral symptoms during the assessment period but was taking an antipsychotic medication. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse for two of three residents (Resident (R) 8 and R55) reviewed for abuse out of 33 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to allow for continued abuse. Findings include: 1. Review of R8's ''admission Record,'' located in the ''Profile'' tab of the EMR, revealed R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and other schizophrenia. Review of R8's annual ''Minimum Data Set (MDS)'' with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/21/25 revealed he scored 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating no cognitive impairment. 2. Review of R55's ''admission Record,'' located in the ''Profile'' tab of the EMR, revealed R55 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. Review of R55's quarterly ''Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure written notice of the transfer to the hospital and the bed hold policy were provided to the resident and the resident's representative upon transfer for three (Resident (R)25, R88, and R4) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization out of a sample of 33 residents. This failure had the potential to cause confusion or distress upon transfer and a lack of understanding of appeal rights or bed hold should the resident not be permitted to return or disagree with the reason for transfer.Findings include: 1. Review of R25's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke and prostate cancer. Family Member (F) 1 was listed as his only emergency contact. Review of R25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/06/25 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR revealed a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I assessment was completed after admission for one resident (Resident (R)8) out of 33 sampled residents. This failure increased the risk for the resident not receiving specialized services as determined by a Level II prompted by a Level I that indicated mental illness.Findings include:Review of R8's ''admission Record,'' located in the ''Profile'' tab of the EMR, revealed R8 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and other schizophrenia. Review of R8's annual ''Minimum Data Set (MDS)'' with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/21/25 revealed a score of 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of the Facility Reportable Investigation dated 06/01/25 revealed he was physically aggressive towards another…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medical staff documented the correct indication for the use of an antipsychotic medication and instead documented a diagnosis of Schizophrenia in the medical record for one resident (Resident (R) 6) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total sample of 33 residents. This failure had the potential to cause psychological distress and impact treatment.Findings include:Review of R6's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).Review of the Care Plan tab revealed a focus area, [R6] uses psychotropic medications r/t [related to] mood disorder dated 04/02/25. The Care Plan did not reflect a diagnosis of schizophrenia.Review of a General Nurses Note dated 04/07/25 and located in the EMR under the Progress Notes tab revealed R6 was sent to a hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide wound treatments as ordered by the physician for one (Resident (R) 80) of 33 sampled residentsFindings include: Review of R80's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Admission tab revealed R80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis of other sites and type 2 diabetes mellitus with other circulatory complications. During an observation and interview on 08/04/25 at 11:15 AM, revealed R80 had an ace bandage on his lower right leg. R80 stated the bandage had not been changed since 08/01/25 and it was supposed to be changed daily. During an observation and interview on 08/04/25 at 11:23 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN1) revealed R80 had a white bandage under an ace bandage dated 08/01 with LPN1's initials. LPN1 also stated she did wound care on R80's lower right leg on 08/01/25. She further stated R80's wound care was supposed to be done daily. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident utilizing supplemental oxygen (Resident (R) 65) had orders and a plan of care for its use and a resident (R31) had clean oxygen concentrator filters out of two residents reviewed for oxygen use out of a total sample of 33 residents. This failure had the potential to cause impaired respiratory function.Findings include: 1.Review of R65's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen levels), acute pulmonary edema (fluid in the lungs), pleural effusion (fluid between the lung and chest wall), and heart failure. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] and located under the Misc tab of the EMR revealed: Patient received incentive spirometry, . and we weaned O2 [oxygen] as tolerated. Patient has been weaned from 4L [liters] to 1L,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure documentation of assessment prior to, and upon return from, dialysis and failed to ensure communication forms were used between the facility and the dialysis center for one of one resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident (R) 2) out of 33 sampled residents. This had the potential to affect the health of residents receiving dialysis.Findings include:Review of R2's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis.Review of the Care Plan tab revealed a focus area, [R2] needs hemodialysis renal failure dated 03/04/24 with interventions including to check the thrill and bruit (dialysis access site) per protocol, observe/document/report any peripheral edema, any signs of infection to the access site, and any bleeding. Review of the Order Summary Report revealed orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received alternative measures prior to the installation of side rails and that assessments were completed for the risk of entrapment for one of four residents (Resident (R)59) reviewed for side rails out of 33 sampled residents. The lack of alternate side rail measures and proper assessment/consent could lead to potential restraint or side rail entrapment.Findings include: Review of R59's admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder and cognitive communication deficit. Review of R59's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/09/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of R59's Care Plan, located under the Care Plan tab of the EMR and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication was ordered upon admission from the hospital for one resident (Resident (R) 113) out of a total sample of 33 residents. This failure increased the risk that the resident would have unrelieved pain.Findings include:Review of R113's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spondylosis (degenerative changes of the spine) and encounter for other orthopedic aftercare (surgery).Review of R113's hospital Discharge Documentation dated 10/17/24 and provided by the facility from the resident's paper chart revealed she underwent fusion of the spine (back surgery) on 10/08/24 and 10/14/24. R113 had an unplanned cage migration (movement of hardware used during the surgeries, which can cause pain) on 10/15/24. Discharge medications included acetaminophen 1000mg every six hours as needed (PRN) for mild pain and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: 2569972Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 7/28/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a resident's physician of a low blood sugar result, and to follow facility policy titled Notification of Changes. This deficient practice was identified for (Resident #7), 1 of 3 residents reviewed and was evidenced by the following:A review of the closed Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was as follows:According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to Diabetes, Hypertension, and Chronic Pain Syndrome. The resident was discharged from the facility on 12/30/2024. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 12/30/2024, Resident #7 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating the resident's cognition was intact. A review of Resident #7's Order Summary Report (OSR) included the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 7/28/2025, it was determined that the facility staff failed to consistently document in the Documentation Survey Report (DSR) the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) status and care provided to the residents. Also, the facility failed to follow its policy titled ADL Documentation Policy. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for ADL documentation. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:1.According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to Quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), Acute Respiratory Failure, and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 5/15/2025, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating the resident's cognition was intact. A review of Resident #3's DSR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00179130 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/07/2024 and 11/08/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a Care Plan (CP) for a resident that had a diagnosis of Diabetes (high blood sugar levels) and was admitted to the facility with elongated(long) toenails. The facility also failed to follow its policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to, Diabetes, Major Depressive Disorder, and Unspecified Dementia (general decline in cognitive abilities that affects a person's ability to perform everyday activities). A review of Resident #2's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 10/27/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ179130 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/07/2024 and 11/08/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to follow standards of clinical practice regarding a.) ensuring a resident was seen by the Podiatrist in a timely manner, b.)ensuring a resident care plan (CP) was developed for a resident that had a diagnosis of Diabetes and was admitted to the facility with elongated (long) toenails, and c.) immediate notification to the Physician of abnormal urine culture results. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed and evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00179130 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/07/2024 and 11/08/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to provide foot care and services for a resident that had a diagnosis of Diabetes (high blood sugar levels) and was admitted to the facility with elongated (long) toenails on 01/18/2024 and was not seen by a Podiatrist until 10/07/2024. The facility also failed to follow its policy titled Podiatry Services. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #2) reviewed for foot care. This deficient practice was evidence by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to, Diabetes, Major Depressive Disorder, and Unspecified Dementia (general decline in cognitive abilities that affects a person's ability to perform everyday activities). A review of Resident #2's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #: NJ00179130 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/07/2024 and 11/08/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to promptly notify the Physician of an abnormal urine culture result. The facility also failed to follow its policy titled Laboratory Services and Reporting. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for laboratory results. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to, Diabetes (high blood sugar levels), Major Depressive Disorder, and Unspecified Dementia (general decline in cognitive abilities that affects a person's ability to perform everyday activities). A review of Resident #2's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 10/27/2024 revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a comfortable and homelike environment for 3 resident rooms (room numbers 211, 212, and 213) on the C/D unit of the facility. The evidence of this deficient practice includes: 1. During the initial tour of the unit on 03/04/24 at 11:32 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], the surveyor observed the side table missing the middle drawer handle, the walls behind and next to the bed with gouges, the opposite wall with scratches and missing paint, the closets with scratches and missing laminate on the edges exposing the raw edge, and the closet drawer handle hanging perpendicular to the drawer. In the bathroom, the surveyor observed a brown discolored ceiling tile, a black bucket under the bathroom sink with water in it, and water on the floor under the sink. 2. On 03/04/24 at 11:40 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], the surveyor observed that the bottom of the window blind was broken in half. The resident stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to a.) properly handle and store potentially hazardous foods in a manner that is intended to prevent the spread of food borne illnesses and b.) maintain equipment and kitchen areas in a manner to prevent microbial growth and cross contamination. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 03/04/24 from 09:54 to 11:03 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen in the presence of the Dietary Director (DD) and observed the following: 1. On a metal rack in the walk-in refrigerator, there were two boxes marked raw chicken drumsticks that were resting on a parchment paper lined metal tray and the paper was marked pull with no date. The DD acknowledged there was no pull date and stated that it was important that expired food was not served, and that the box should have had a label with a pulled and use by date. 2. There was a box marked fresh leaf lettuce with a sticker dated 2/15/24. The lettuce was wilted, dry, had brown edges and there was black lettuce…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices and perform hand hygiene as indicated during meal tray pass observed in the Main Dining area. The deficient practice was evidenced as follows: On 03/04/24 at 12:07 PM, the surveyor observed the following: The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was standing at Resident #19's table, and with her bare hands, she opened a packet of powder, emptied the powder into a cup of white liquid and mixed it with a spoon with her left hand. With her right hand she removed a phone from her pocket and touched the phone screen then placed it back into her pocket. The LPN continued to stir the liquid with her left hand and added more powder from the packet with her right hand then continued to stir. The LPN then moved the cup onto the resident's tray and placed the spoon on the tray. The LPN returned to the food cart area and placed her hands in her pockets. She then approached the food cart, removed a food tray, and placed it in front of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of electronic medical records and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of clinical practice with respect to obtaining a diagnosis for the use of an antibiotic intravenous medication for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #184) reviewed for antibiotics. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. According to the admission Record, Resident #184 was admitted to the facility in March of 2024. The resident did not have a comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint # 155679, 165123, and 168629 Based on interviews, review of electronic medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) obtain a physician order for the treatment of a skin tear that was obtained during a fall and b.) update a resident's Care Plan (CP) with fall prevention interventions after the resident fell on [DATE]. This was deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #334) reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #334 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, osteomyelitis (infection of the bone), sepsis (occurs when your immune system has a dangerous reaction to an infection), and malignant neoplasm of the brain. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool that facilitates a resident's care, dated 09/07/23, reflected that the resident was cognitively impaired and had a history of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag did not touch the floor and b.) ensure the urinary catheter drainage bag was kept below the level of the bladder for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #67) reviewed for urinary catheter. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/04/24 at 9:58 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #67 lying in bed. The resident had a urinary catheter (a tube placed in the body to empty urine) with a drainage bag secured to the bed. The bottom of the urinary catheter drainage bag was touching the floor. According to the admission Record, Resident #67 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, retention of urine. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 01/08/24, included the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. Further review of the MDS included the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to label and dispose of medications in accordance with accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #184) reviewed for antibiotic therapy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #184 was admitted to the facility in March of 2024. The resident did not have a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed at this time. The admission assessment (AA) indicated that Resident #184 was admitted to the facility with intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy and rehabilitation. The AA indicated that the resident had the diagnoses of cellulitis and that the resident had a single lumen peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) located in the right upper arm. On 03/04/24 at 10:47 AM, during tour, the surveyor observed a sign posted on the resident's door indicating that the resident was on transmission-based- precautions/contact isolation. The sign also indicated that to enter the room you must…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Complaint NJ# 168629 Based on interview and review of medical records and other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an accurately documented and complete medical record for 1 of 22 reviewed (Resident #334). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #334 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to osteomyelitis (infection of the bone), sepsis (occurs when your immune system has a dangerous reaction to an infection), and malignant neoplasm of the brain. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool that facilitates a resident's care, dated 09/07/23, reflected that the resident was cognitively impaired and had a history of falls prior to admission to the facility. The resident was unable to be interviewed as he/she was not currently a resident in the facility. On 03/03/24 at 11:48 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility's fall investigation and fall incident report, dated 10/08/23, which revealed the following information: According to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to act on or respond to, comments made by the Pharmacist Consultant in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for unnecessary medications and was evidenced by the following: According to the Pharmacist Consultant's Therapeutic Suggestions dated 07/26/21, the Pharmacist Consultant (PC) made a recommendation for Resident #31 As per CMS guidelines, is a taper of Zoloft [an antidepressant medication] indicated? If a taper of this medication is contraindicated, include the rationale in your response to this request. A review of the Order Summary Report for Active Orders as of 07/01/2021 revealed that Resident #31 had an order dated 01/12/21 for Sertraline HCL (Zoloft) 100 mg daily, an anti-depressant. A review of the 07/21, 08/21, 09/21, 10/21, and 11/21 Medication Administration Records (MAR) revealed Resident #31 received the medication daily. A review of the 12/21 MAR revealed that Resident #31 received the medication on 12/01/21, 12/02/21,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe, consistent manner designed to prevent foodborne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/29/21 at 9:52 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. In the dessert refrigerator, an undated turkey and cheese sandwich wrapped in clear plastic was stored on a shelf. 2. In the dessert refrigerator, an undated styrofoam cup containing dessert and an undated styrofoam cup containing lemonade was stored on a shelf. 3. In the dessert refrigerator, an opened bottle of ginger ale was stored on a shelf. 4. In the dessert refrigerator, an opened and undated bottle of water was stored on a shelf. 5. In the dessert refrigerator, an undated food platter wrapped in a plactic bag was stored on a shelf. When interviewed, the FSD stated that staff was suppose to label and date all personal items when stored in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) consistently monitor fluid restriction instructions in accordance with the physician's order and professional standards of care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #56) reviewed for dementia care and b.) clarify conflicting physician orders for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as casefinding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow an active physician's order to apply bilateral heel protectors (a cushioned pressure relieving device for heels) (heel protectors) while in bed. This deficient practice was identified for Resident #56, 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and Resident #24, 1 of 1 resident reviewed for positioning and mobility and was evidenced by the following: On 12/01/21 at 10:58 AM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #56 asleep with the head of bed elevated. Surveyor #1 observed that the resident had a heel protector applied to the left foot and no heel protector on the right foot. Surveyor #1 further observed a heel protector on the resident's wheelchair which was positioned near the resident's closet. According to the admission Record, Resident #56 had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to: dementia, diabetes, and heart failure. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 10/21/21, revealed the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2021-12-08 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a.) the Resident Care Staffing Report was posted on 1 of 2 nursing units (C/D unit) and b.) the posted Resident Care Staffing Report was completed for each shift on 1 of 2 nursing units (A/B unit). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/30/2021 at 12:33 PM, the surveyor observed the Resident Care Staffing Report for the A/B unit on a bulletin board near the nurses' station. The 7a-3p shift section of the form was not completed. On 12/01/2021 at 9:30 AM, the surveyor was unable to locate the Resident Care Staffing Report at the front entrance. The Receptionist was unaware of where the Resident Care Staffing Report was located. On 12/01/2021 at 9:32 AM, the surveyor observed the Resident Care Staffing Report for the A/B unit on a bulletin board near the nurses' station. The 7a-3p shift section of the form was not completed. The surveyor then asked the A/B Unit Manager (UM) to make a copy of the form. The A/B UM took the form off the board,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSD ENTITIES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/01/2011 |
| GOLDBERG, SIMCHAH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 11% | since 06/01/2011 |
| KERMAN, NEIL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 45% | since 06/01/2011 |
| ENGELSON, DANIEL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 12/30/2014 |
| STERN, SAMUEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2011 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in NJ
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315058. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.