Autumn Lake Healthcare At Riverview
1 Eastern Boulevard, Essex, MD 21221 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 238 certified beds · (410) 574-1400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.5% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 18.1% | 22.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 32.8% | 22.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.0% | 16.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.1% | 5.9% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.0% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.1% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.3% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.4% | 80.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.6% | 21.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.7% | 9.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.27 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.63 | 1.20 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
61.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 548 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 79.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 194 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 63% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 61.9%CMS range 56.5–65.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.2%CMS range 11.3–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 79.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 68.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 4.2–8.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.17 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 238 beds and averages 223.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate linen for residents. This was evident for two ([NAME] and Swan) out of four units observed during the recertification survey.The findings include:On 06/08/2026 at 8:26 AM, an interview with Resident #253 was conducted. They reported that the facility staff did not have enough linen and there were not enough bed sheets. The resident alleged that they were put in wheelchairs in the morning due to lack of bed sheets to make clean beds. On 06/08/2026 at 1:26 PM, an interview with Resident #128 was conducted. They reported that there were no sheets to make their bed and that the facility had a shortage of linen. At this time, the surveyor observed Resident #128's bed without any sheets. On 06/11/2026 at 12:37 PM, the surveyor observed room [ROOM NUMBER] bed 1 ([NAME] unit) with no bed sheets on and the resident was sitting in a wheelchair. A brief interview with Staff #28, Geriatric Nursing Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control regarding enhanced barrier precautions while providing high contact care. This was evident for four (Resident #12, #24, #147 & #223) out of seven residents reviewed for respiratory care. The findings include: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are infection control measures, primarily for nursing homes, requiring healthcare workers to wear gloves and gowns during high-contact resident care activities (like bathing, dressing) to prevent spreading multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to hands and clothing, even if blood/body fluid exposure isn't expected, extending standard precautions for residents with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) or at high risk (wounds, devices). Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) refers to specialized gear like gloves, gowns, masks, and goggles that create a barrier to protect healthcare workers from infectious materials (blood, body fluids, germs) and prevent them from spreading infections to patients or others. 1)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on family interview, record review, and Staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide quarterly statements to the Resident's Representative. This was evident for one (Resident #7) out of two residents reviewed for personal funds. The findings include:On 6/8/2026 at 12:29 PM, an interview with Resident #7's Representative (RP) was conducted. When asked if they received quarterly statements from the facility, the RP stated that they have not been receiving them. On 6/8/2026 at 12:45 PM, a review of Resident #7's chart was conducted. Resident #7's RP was charted as the responsible party. Resident #7's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was noted as 99. A BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) is the standardized test which measures orientation and recall skills on a scale from 0 to 15. The number 99 is an administrative code used by care teams to indicate that the patient was unable to complete the interview.On 6/11/2026 at 12:45 PM, an interview with Business Office Manager (Staff #33) was conducted. When asked how Quarterly statements are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility investigation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident remained free from verbal abuse. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #85) reviewed for abuse during the annual survey. The findings include: On 06/11/2026 at 1:27 PM, a review of Facility Reported Incident (FRI) #3009635 revealed an allegation of verbal/mental abuse involving Resident #85 and Staff #35, a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA). According to the resident, on 05/07/2026 at approximately 6:30 PM, Staff #35 entered the resident's room, stood over the resident's bed with her hands on her hips, and stated, You tried to get me in trouble with [NAME]. Resident #85 reported feeling threatened by the interaction and stated they thought Staff #35 was going to hit them.Further review of the facility's investigation on 06/11/2026 at 1:35 PM revealed that the resident consistently reported that Staff #35 entered their room the evening following a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 14 days after the assessment reference date. This was evident for one (Resident #185) out of three residents reviewed for resident assessments.The findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive and accurate assessment of each resident's functional capacity and health status to assist nursing home staff in identifying health problems. MDS assessments are required for residents on admission to the nursing facility and then periodically, within specific guidelines and time frames the Quarterly MDS is to be completed no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD).On 6/10/26, a surveyor review of the clinical record of Resident #185 revealed that the quarterly MDS had an ARD date of 2/4/26. Staff was required to complete the annual MDS by 2/18/26. This MDS for Resident #185 is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to transmit MDS assessments within 14 days of completing the assessment. This was evident for one (Resident #185) out of three residents reviewed for resident assessments. The findings include:According to the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) (2018), the MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a federally mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. That information must be encoded in the form of an MDS assessment within 7 days of when an assessment of a resident is completed. It is also a requirement that MDS information be transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) System within 14 days after an assessment of a resident is completed. On 6/10/26, a surveyor review of the clinical record of Resident #185 revealed that Resident #185's Quarterly MDS that had an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) date of 4/30/25 was completed on 5/14/26 (Z0500B) and required to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately document health status in the admission Minimum Data Set. This was evident for one (Resident # 50) out of 35 residents reviewed during the survey.The findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive and accurate assessment of each resident's functional capacity and health status to assist nursing home staff in identifying health problems. MDS assessments are required for residents on admission to the nursing facility and then periodically, within specific guidelines and time frames.During a review of Resident #50's clinical records on 6/9/26 at 8:50AM, it was noted that Resident #50 was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation on 5/26/26 after spinal surgery and with a percutaneous gastrostomy tube (PEG- a flexible feeding tube placed directly into the stomach through the abdominal wall) in place. Further review of the clinical record revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to address identified pressure injuries. This was evident for one (Resident #75) out of two residents reviewed for pressure injury during the facility's recertification/complaint survey.The findings Include:On 06/11/2026 at 8:18 AM, review of Resident #75's clinical record revealed multiple pressure injuries. Review of wound assessments and treatment documentation revealed ongoing wound care interventions. However, review of the resident's care plan failed to reveal a care plan addressing the resident's identified pressure injuries, including the location of the pressure injuries, associated risks, goals, and individualized interventions.On 06/11/2026 at 8:56 AM, in an interview with the Unit Manager, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #12), when asked who was responsible for initiating and updating care plans, she stated that baseline care plans were initiated upon admission by all the nurses and that she was responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure participation of a resident in the care planning process. This was evident for one (Resident #12) out of three residents reviewed for care plan during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:The care plan provides an opportunity to see if it meets the residents' needs by reviewing what strategies are working and which are not. It can also identify changes in the resident's condition or behavior that will require revisions of the care plan. Care conferences are usually held on a regular basis, often quarterly, but can be scheduled more frequently if needed based on the resident's condition.MOLST stands for Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment. It is a bright, easy-to-read medical form that turns one's end-of-life care wishes into real doctor's orders. It must be signed by a licensed doctor, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant.MDS stands for Minimum Data Set. It is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were administered within the facility's established medication administration time frames. This was evident for three (Resident #18, #231 & #252) out of seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The findings include:1) On 6/8/2026 at 8:43 AM, an interview with Resident #18 revealed that he/she did not receive their medications on time. On 6/10/2026 at 9:10 AM, record review revealed that there was an active order for Apixaban (blood thinner) 5 milligrams by mouth every 12 hours. At the same time, it was revealed that Apixaban was administered late on the following dates: -6/2/2026 - Scheduled for 8:00 AM; administered at 9:23 AM-6/3/2026 - Scheduled for 8:00 AM; administered at 9:26 AM-6/4/2026 - Scheduled for 8:00 AM; administered at 9:30 AM-6/5/2026 - Scheduled for 8:00 PM; administered at 9:42 PM-6/9/2026 - Scheduled for 8:00 AM; administered at 9:54 PM 2)On 6/8/2026 at 1:09 PM, an interview with Resident #231 revealed that he/she did not receive their medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary services. This was evident for one (Resident #253) out of five residents reviewed for ADLS (activities of daily living).The findings include:During screening on 6/8/26 at 11:53 AM, Resident #253 reported that he/she had only one shower since arriving at the facility on 5/29/26. Resident #253 stated, That was 10 days ago and the only reason I got that shower was I put up a fuss. I cannot shower on my own, especially washing my hair. I need help. I had a stroke. A review of Resident 253's EMR (electronic medical record) revealed that Resident #253 was admitted on Friday, May 29, 2026 with diagnosis including but not limited to, stroke with left-sided hemiplegia (paralysis).During a follow up interview on 6/9/26 at 1:29 PM, Resident #253 stated, I have had only one shower since I came here. I came on Friday, 5/29. I was told my shower day was Wednesday. Wednesday (6/3/26) came and I did not get a shower. On Thursday (6/4/26), when I complained about not getting a shower, GNA (geriatric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident had a call bell near reach. This was evident for one (Resident #8) out of eight residents reviewed for call bells during the recertification survey.The findings include:On 06/08/2026 at 9:47 AM, during unit round, the surveyor observed Resident #8 without a call bell near reach.On 06/08/2026 at 11:58 AM, an interview with Resident #8 was conducted. Resident reported that since they moved into their room, they've not had a call bell. The surveyor looked around the resident's bed and was unable to locate a call bell. On 06/08/2026 at 12:01 PM, an interview with Staff #4 was conducted in the resident's room. Staff looked under the resident's bed and was unable to retrieve the call bell. On 06/09/2026 at 1:58 PM, an interview with Staff # 6, Unit Manager, was conducted. She reported that it was the facility's expectation that all residents should have a call bell near reach at all times. At this time, the surveyor discussed the call bell concerns with the unit manager. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement care plan interventions to report a significant weight loss to the physician and Registered Dietitian. This was evident for one (Resident #2) out of two residents reviewed for nutrition and hydration.The findings include:On 6/8/2026 at 12:46 PM, a review of Resident #2's records was conducted. Resident #2 had a decline of 9.2 lbs (5.7%) from 5/6/2026 (162.2 lbs) to 6/1/2026 (153.0 lbs). This weight was documented by Staff #7. On 6/9/2026 at 10:23 AM, a review of the progress notes revealed that there was no Dietician or Provider notes regarding the weight change. The last Dietician note was on 5/27/2026 and addressed a progressive weight gain over 3 months leading up to the 5/6/2026 documented weight. Dietician documented to monitor for weight changes, labs, and percent of meal intakes. On 6/9/2026 at 10:40 AM, an interview with Staff #7 was conducted. When asked when the nursing staff would notify a Dietician or provider of weight changes, Staff #7 stated the dietician is notified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to be consistent with professional standards regarding supplemental oxygen requirement. This was found to be evident for two (Resident #15 and #147) out of four residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. The findings include: The facility's Oxygen Administration Policy: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician, except in the case of an emergency. In such case, oxygen is administered and orders for oxygen are obtained as soon as practicable when the situation is under control. (implemented 1/27/23) 1). Review of Resident #147's EMR (electronic medical record) revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE]. During screening on 6/8/26 at 10:48 AM, Resident #147 was observed to be utilizing supplemental oxygen at 3 L (liters) of flow via a nasal cannula. On 6/10/26 at 8: 34 AM, Resident #147 was observed utilizing a nasal cannula supplying 3L of supplemental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received an annual dental visit. This was evident for two (Resident #13 and #85) out of four residents reviewed for dental services. The findings include: 1)On 6/8/2026 at 9:44 AM, an interview with Resident #13 revealed that he/she had not seen the dentist in a while. On 6/10/2026 at 12:16 PM, record review revealed that the resident was last seen by a dentist on 2/27/2024. 2)On 6/8/2026 at 9:08 AM, an interview with Resident #85 revealed that he/she had not seen the dentist in a while. On 6/10/2026 at 12:09 PM, record review revealed that the resident was last seen by a dentist on 4/2/2024. On 6/12/2026 at 10:40 AM, the concerns were addressed with the Director of Nursing.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the clinical record for one (Resident #119) of five residents reviewed for advance directives during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:MOLST stands for Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment. It is a bright, easy-to-read medical form that turns one's end-of-life care wishes into real doctor's orders. It must be signed by a licensed doctor, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant.On [DATE] at 10:43 AM, review of Resident #119's paper medical record revealed a Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form indicating that informed consent had been obtained from the resident's guardian of person as per authority granted by court and other legal authority in accordance with all provisions of the Health Care Decisions Act. Review of the paper medical record and electronic health record (EHR) failed to reveal documentation of a current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility's designated hospice interdisciplinary team member failed to ensure documentation regarding hospice care was available and communicated with the facility staff. This was evident for one (Resident #147) out of to residents reviewed for hospice. The findings include: A review of Resident #147's electronic medical record (EMR) on 6/10/26 at 10:04 AM revealed Resident #147 was admitted to [Hospice] services on 5/12/26 for metastatic colon cancer. Further review of Resident #147's medical record revealed the record did not have evidence of Resident #147's most recent hospice care plan, the hospice election form, the physician certification, and the names and contact information for the hospice personnel involved in Resident #147's care.During an interview on 6/10/26 at 10:47 AM, RN (registered nurse) #16 (hospice nurse) stated, We have a [hospice] IDT (interdisciplinary team) meeting every Thursday at our [the hospice] office and that is what generates the weekly care plan. I then bring the print out to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 6 (Residents #3, #1, #9, #4, #12, #10) of 16 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) On 4/27/26 at 12:40 PM a review of Resident #3's medical record was conducted and revealed Resident #3 had a history of cerebrovascular disease.Review of Resident #3's MDS assessment with an ARD of 3/2/26, Section J0100A pain management, received scheduled pain medication was coded, yes. Review of Resident #3's March 2026 Medication Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of complaint, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify a resident's responsible party (RP) when there was a change in condition in a resident's medical status. This was evident for 1 (Resident #11) of 16 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: Narcan (naloxone) is a life-saving nasal spray that rapidly reverses opioid overdoses. It is used for emergencies involving heroin, fentanyl, or prescription opioids and is safe to use even if no opioids are present. On 4/27/26 at 9:14 AM a review of complaint 2991540 alleged there was no communication with the RP when the medication Narcan had to be administered to Resident #11 for an alleged overdose. On 4/27/26 at 9:14 AM a review of Resident #11's medical record revealed progress notes that documented Resident #11 was admitted to the facility in March 2026 with diagnoses that included a nondisplaced zone 1 fracture of the sacrum, a nondisplaced fracture of the posterior column of the right acetabulum (the deep, cup-shaped socket on the right side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for residents. This was evident for 2 (Resident #13 and #11) of 16 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: 1) The facility staff failed to administer treatment per the Wound Doctor's orders for Resident #13. Review of Resident #13's medical record on 4/27/26 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in February 2026 following a hospitalization with discharge diagnoses to include acute systolic heart failure and peripheral edema. Further review of Resident #13's medical record on 4/28/26 revealed the Resident was first assessed by the Wound Doctor on 3/12/26 for a venous wound of the right shin, left medial foot and left second toe. At the time the Wound Doctor ordered oil emulsion daily for all 3 wounds. Further review of Resident #13's medical record revealed the Wound Doctor reassessed the Resident's wounds on 3/19/26. At the time the Wound Doctor reassessed the right shin,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on complaint, observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to keep the environment free from accident hazards. This was evident for 1 of 6 nursing units observed during a complaint survey.The findings include:On 4/29/26 at 7:25 AM a review of complaint 2723364 alleged the concern about cleaning supplies not being in a locked area on the dementia unit and the potential for residents to use cleaning wipes for personal use.On 4/30/26 at 8:10 AM observation was made in the dining room of the Seagull Unit, which is the locked dementia unit. Observation was made of disinfectant wipes sitting on a wire shelf. The wording on the containers stated, store in original container in areas inaccessible to children. The back of the contained stated, do not use as a diaper wipe or for personal cleansing. This is not a baby wipe.At the time of the observation Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #18 was in the dining room with the residents while they were waiting for breakfast. The unit manager, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #13 was with the surveyor during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 1 (Resident #11) of 16 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate.On 4/27/26 at 9:14 AM a review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the April 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) which documented the day, time, and nurse's initials of when medication was administered. At the same time the Controlled Drug Administration Record was reviewed to determine if it matched the April 2026 MAR. The Controlled Drug Administration Record documents when a narcotic such as Hydromorphone is given. Review of both records revealed that Resident #11's April 2026 MAR was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely administer medications as ordered. This was evident for 1 (Resident #86) of 85 residents reviewed for medications administration involving 22 medications administered during 6 days in May 2025. The findings include: On 5/27/25 at 11:52 AM, during an interview conducted with Resident #86, the resident expressed the concern that his/her medications are not given on time, especially the medication for his/her liver. On 5/29/2025 at 8:30 AM, a review of Resident #86's MAR for 2025 in the electronic medical record revealed documentation of a check mark for all medications, which indicated that they had been administered. On 6/3/2025 at approximately 1:30PM, the Surveyor requested that the DON provide a copy of Resident #86's MAR for May 2025 and Medication Administration Audit Report from May 17, 2025 through May 31, 2025. The Surveyor confirmed that the Medication Administration Audit Report included the medication, the schedule date, administration time, the documented time, and documented by whom on the report. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to promote care in a manner that maintains dignity and respect for residents who required staff assistance with their meals. This was found to be evident during observations of a breakfast and lunch dining experience for 5 (Residents #64, #115, #10, #120, #78) of 85 residents reviewed during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: 1. On 5/27/25 at 8:15 AM GNA (staff # 19) was observed feeding Resident #64 breakfast in their room. The GNA was standing up above the resident feeding the resident several forkfuls of food from the plate on the resident's overbed table. At this time the surveyor entered the resident room and asked staff # 19 if there was an explanation for not sitting in the chair next to the resident's bed while assisting with feeding? She stated, my sciatica is bothering me, and it is not comfortable when sitting down. The surveyor asked the GNA if she was aware staff are to sit at the level of the resident as to not rush the resident with their dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and an interview with a resident, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean homelike environment. This was evident for 1 room out of 18 rooms observed during the initial tour of two second floor nursing units. The findings include: On 5/27/2025 at 8:52 AM, a tour of Resident #86's room revealed two curtains, one on each side of the resident's bed, with multiple dry reddish-brown stains on each curtain. During an interview with Resident #86, the Surveyor was informed that the resident uses the curtains to wipe blood off his/her finger after a finger stick. On 5/27/2025 at approximately 10:20 AM, the Surveyor made the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) aware of the findings in Resident #86's room. The NHA stated maintenance will replace the curtains.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. MD00204713 was reviewed on 5/30/25 at 1:15 PM for allegations of abuse to Resident #232. According to the investigation and a statement provided by staff, Environmental Staff (EVS) #18, who indicated that she overheard the resident say to GNA (#17), you are hurting me and the GNA went on to use [explicative] at the resident. Further review of the investigation revealed that the allegation could not be verified or refuted based on the timeline of events, interviews with the resident and other residents and no one else reported hearing cursing from the resident room. There was a possibility that Staff # 18 voiced the concern as retaliation towards Staff #17 due to the staff making a complaint about Staff #18 the previous day. An interview was conducted with the DON on 5/30/25 at 2:00 PM and she stated that according to the investigation, Staff # 18 allegedly overheard staff verbal abuse and did not report it until the next day. The DON stated that Staff #18 received a written warning for failure to report in a timely manner and that education was provided to staff. 3. MD00204531…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notification of transfer to the resident and resident representative or provide written notification of bedhold, and failed to ensure the local ombudsman was notified of transfer to the hospital. This was evident for 1 (Resident #9) out of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The findings include: On 6/2/2025 at 12:13 PM, during a review of Resident #9 medical record, the Surveyor discovered that Resident #9 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE], 10/17/2024, and 3/30/2025. An additional review failed to reveal documentation to verify that Resident #9 received a copy of the facility's bed hold form upon discharge to the hospital on [DATE], 10/17/2024, and 3/30/2025. Bed Hold is holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for therapeutic leave or hospitalization. On 6/3/2025 at 2:00 PM, during an interview conducted with Unit Manager #34, the Surveyor was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission. This was evident for 1 (Resident #84) of 4 residents reviewed for care planning during survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. During a record review on 05/29/25 at 12:32 PM it was revealed that Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The baseline care plan for Resident #84 was dated 10/31/23, six days after the resident's admission. An interview was conducted with Staff #4 on 05/30/25 at 11:31 AM. Staff #4 stated that the facility's expectation is for the baseline care plan to be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission. On 05/30/25 at 12:23 PM, Staff #4 provided documentation indicating that a care plan meeting took place on 10/27/23, which was within the 48-hour requirement;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 Residents (#73,# 471) out of 85 residents reviewed during survey. The findings include: 1) Record review on 6/3/2025 revealed Resident #471 had a past medical history of a right-sided stroke with residual of left-sided hemiparalysis, and was discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of encephalopathy pyelonephritis. Encephalopathy, specifically mild encephalopathy with a reversible splenial lesion (MERS), can occur as a complication of pyelonephritis, an infection of the kidneys. While pyelonephritis is primarily known for its kidney-related symptoms like fever and flank pain, in rare cases, it can lead to neurological symptoms like headache, vision changes, or altered mental status. A urinary tract infection (UTI) is an infection that occurs in any part of the urinary system, which includes the kidneys, bladder, ureters, and urethra. They are typically caused by bacteria entering the urinary tract through the urethra…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, and review of the medical record it was determined that the facility failed to 1) ensure residents were offered the opportunity to participate in their care planning process by holding timely quarterly care plan meetings for 1 (Resident # 21) of 2 residents reviewed for care planning, and 2) develop and revise a comprehensive, person-centered care plans with measurable objectives and timetables to address the resident needs for 1 (Resident #130) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure injuries during the survey. The findings include: A care plan is used to summarize a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments and outlines what needs to be done to plan, assess, and manage care. Care plans are developed, reviewed, and/or revised by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) after the completion of a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (Admission, Annual, Quarterly, Significant Change) to help to evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of administrative records and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility staff failed to properly turn and position a resident while providing care. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 232) of 18 residents reviewed for abuse allegations during the survey. Findings include: MD00204713 was reviewed on 5/30/25 at 1:15 PM for allegations of abuse. According to the facility's investigation, on 4/14/24 GNA #17 was rough while turning and repositioning Resident #232 during ADL care. The resident was interviewed and stated that s/he was fine and was not afraid but does not desire to have the GNA provide further care. An interview was conducted with the DON on 5/30/25 at 1:45 PM and she stated that she worked at the facility for a long period of time and that she can recall this incident. She went on to explain that the GNA did not use proper turning techniques when turning and repositioning the resident. She further explained that the GNA was terminated for not providing good customer service during care. Abuse was unsubstantiated. All…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement timely, appropriate, and individualized interventions to prevent and treat a pressure injury. This is evident for 1 (Resident #130) of 2 residents reviewed with pressure wounds. The findings include: The Braden Scale is a clinical tool used to assess a person's risk of developing pressure injuries by evaluating factors like mobility, moisture, activity level, nutrition, sensory perception, and friction/shear. A score of 12 or below is considered high risk for developing pressure injuries. During review of Resident #130's electronic medical record on 5/29/25 at 9:59 AM, it was revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with a Braden Scale score of 12 (high risk). From that date through 4/23/25, multiple Braden assessments reflected a continued high risk for skin breakdown, with scores ranging from 11 to 13. A nursing note dated 10/14/24 at 11:49 PM indicated a physical therapist reported an open area on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Food temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit (for cold foods) and below 135 degrees Farhenheit (for hot foods) allow the rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness. On 06.01.25 at 12:30 PM the surveyor observed the kitchenette/galley serving station in the Seagull activity room/dining room. There was no dietary aide present in the galley preparation area. The surveyor observed a bin of small containers/cups of apricots and applesauce that were not refrigerated on the second shelf next to the hot water/steam serving table. The outside of the containers were warm to touch. The surveyor observed the 40 residents in the Seagull dining room waiting to be served their lunch meal. Six geriatric nursing assistants (GNAs) were present in the dining room. On 06.01.25 at 1:07 PM the surveyor observed the dietary staff # 11 enter the galley area and unloaded the food items to the steam table. The surveyor during the interview informed dietary staff #11 of the presence of the cups of apricots and applesauce that were unrefrigerated. Staff #11 stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3. Review of Resident #192's MAR on 6/3/25 at 1:30 PM revealed an order for Rexulti 3 mg(milligrams) one tablet by mouth one time a day; however, there was no indication for the use of this medication for the resident. Rexulti is a medication used to treat several mental conditions. On 6/3/25 at 1:00 PM, the surveyor shared the above concerns with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated all medications should have reason documented as to why the resident is prescribed it. 4. Resident #163's medical record was reviewed on 6/2/25 at 12:05 PM for pressure ulcers. During a review of the residents' Change Of Condition (COC) form dated 11/24/24 it indicated the resident was noted to have a new open area to right heel. Further review of the medical record revealed a care plan for risk for alteration in skin integrity that was initiated 11/11/24. There was no care plan for actual open area. An interview was conducted with the DON on 6/2/15 at 1:00 PM and she was asked to provide a copy of the resident care plan for the identified open area to the resident heel. The DON stated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3. On 6/2/25 at 1:25 PM the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #40 in the dining room on Seagull Unit take a white napkin from her uniform pocket, wipe her nose and then put the napkin back into her uniform pocket. Staff #40 then proceeded to pick up a resident's tray in the dining room and began to cut up the items on the tray without sanitizing and washing her hands. After surveyor intervention the LPN #40 discarded the tray, and another tray was prepared for the resident. LPN #40 stated she knows she should have washed and or sanitized her hands prior to picking up the resident's tray. Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices and policies by ensuring that dirty dishes are removed from a resident's room (Resident #59) and a process was in place for cleaning after use and ensuring that staff sanitized their hands in between residents during medication administration. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 85 residents observed and 2 staff observed during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment by ensuring that dirty trash was emptied and removed, clothes bins containing dirty clothes were emptied and the utility room and Dining Room floors were cleaned. This was evident when observations were made on the Seagull Unit during the facility's survey. The findings include: On 5/27/25 at 8 am during observation rounds at Seagull Unit storage room the following was observed: 1. The dirty utility room on seagull located next to the nursing unit was observed with 13 bags of dirty trash noted on the floor. There were 2 large yellow trash cans noted in the room which were full and trash bags hanging them over. 2. Three large clothing bins which were filled to the top with dirty clothing. 3. The room smelled of urine and feces which could be smelled through the closed door to the storage room. The LPN staff #40 accompanied the surveyor to the room and verified the findings. The laundry/housekeeping supervisor staff #41 was contacted and the storage room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-27 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY AL Riverview F574 Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to post contact information for the Ombudsman and provide the correct contact information to file a complaint with the Office of Healthcare Quality. The findings include: The Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman advocates for residents of nursing homes by protecting their rights and promoting the well-being of residents of Long-Term Care facilities. They work to resolve problems of individual residents and to bring about changes at the local, state, and national levels that will improve residents' care and quality of life. The Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) is the agency within the Maryland Department of Health charged with monitoring the quality of care in Maryland ' s health care facilities and community-based programs. On 10/21/21 at 11:33 am during the Resident Council meeting the residents denied knowing how to file a complaint with the state and how to reach the LTC Ombudsman ' s office about concerns. 10/21/21 at 11:52 am Next to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-27 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
AL Riverview F577 Based on observation and interviews, the facility staff failed to have the survey results book readily accessible for review by residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents in areas of the facility that are prominent and accessible to the public. This was found to be evident during observations made during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: On 10/21/21 at 11:33 am during the resident council meeting the residents verbalized they were not aware the facility had a copy of the survey results nor where to find the survey book. On 10/21/21 at 12:00 pm, two surveyors went to the front lobby to assess whether the survey book was readily accessible. Observation of the area confirmed the facility ' s survey book was not was not visible. The surveyors asked the receptionist for the facility ' s survey book. On 10/25/21 at 8:48 am during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) (Staff #3). The DON stated the facility ' s lobby has changed since COVID, and the survey book was on a table in the front lobby between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY AL Riverview F584 Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure the environment was maintained in a manner that was safe, comfortable, and homelike. This was evidenced for 4 of 46 resident rooms and in 1of 2 communal dining areas observed during the survey. The findings include: On 10/13/21 at 7:47 am during the initial tour, the communal dining room located on the 2nd floor had two chairs that were broken. There was a white substance in an electrical outlet on the wall near the emergency cart, and a metal hook on the wall about 12 inches from the electrical outlet. On 10/14/21 at 11:20 am the air conditioner near the window in room [ROOM NUMBER] had a black substance on the exterior grate. On 10/15/21 at 12:02 pm the hand sanitizer dispenser in room [ROOM NUMBER] did not work and it was not tightly secured to the wall. On 10/26/21 at 10:08 am during a walk-through of [NAME] with Maintenance Director #30 the commode in room [ROOM NUMBER] was stopped up. On 10/26/21 at 10:26 am during a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation of medication administration, interview with facility staff, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff followed professional standards of medication administration when Certified Medical Assistant (CMA) #6 failed to document all medications that were administered to Resident #24 at the time that they were administered. This was evident for 5 of 26 medications observed during the medication administration observation. The findings include: The surveyor observed CMA #6 administer medication to Resident #24 on 10/20/21 at 7:45 AM. During the observation, CMA #6 administered nine different medications to Resident #24: lisinopril, colace, a multivitamin, metoprolol, glipizide, low-dose aspirin, vitamin D3, Januvia, and gabapentin. The resident took and ingested all medication. The surveyor reviewed Resident #24's Medication Administration Record (MAR) on 10/20/21 at 8:50 AM, 9:20 AM, and 9:55 AM. On all three checks, the MAR showed that only four medications had been administered by CMA #6: lisinopril,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview with facility staff, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to have a medication error rate of less than 5% during the medication observation facility task. This was evident for 4 of 26 medications administered during the observation. The findings include: During a medication administration observation that took place on 10/20/21 at 7:36 AM, the surveyor observed Certified Medical Assistant (CMA) #6 administer medications to Resident #80. The medications included a tablet of Lexapro 10mg (miligrams). Later at 7:45 AM, the surveyor observed CMA #6 administer medications to Resident #24 including Januvia and Gabapentin. During a second medication administration observation that took place on 10/20/21 at 8:01 AM, the surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN) #7 administer medications to Resident #3. During the administration, RN #7 gave Resident #3 a dose of Wixela inhaler. The RN administered the medication by placing the mouthpiece of the inhaler in Resident #3's mouth and depressing the plunger. RN #7 failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications requiring refrigeration were stored at the correct temperature, that medication was not kept in storage beyond its expiration date, and that narcotic lock boxes in medication refrigerators were secured to the inside of the refrigerator and could not be removed. This was evident for 1 of 3 medication refrigerators and 3 of 3 medication rooms reviewed during the survey. The findings include: During a tour of the 600 unit medication room that took place on 10/25/21 at 9:16 AM, the surveyor found that the lock box in the refrigerator was not permanently affixed to the inside of the refrigerator. It contained three unopened 30 mL vials of Lorazepam, 2mg per mL. A pack of 19 Humanlog Kwikpen insulin pens were reviewed and 1 of the 19 had expired, with an expiration date of January, 2021. Review of the temperature logs showed that temperatures were not recorded 10/9/21, 10/19/21, 10/21/21, 10/23/21, and 10/25/21. The surveyor spoke with Licensed Practical Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was prepared and stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: The surveyor conducted an initial brief tour of the kitchen on 10/13/2021 at 7:44 AM with the Kitchen Supervisor/ [NAME] (staff #13). During the tour, the surveyor observed 1) a tray with one pork tenderloin thawing in the refrigerator on bottom shelf without a date the thawing began, 2) paper trash in the ice cream freezer which was contained a small cardboard box on top of frozen goods, 3) wet nesting of clean white dessert bowls, wet-nesting occurs when wet dishes or pots and pans are stacked, preventing them from drying, and creating conditions that are ripe for microorganisms to grow, 4) alfredo sauce in a metal container laid on top of several loaves of bread in the freezer 5) ice on the ceiling of the walk in freezer with evidence of droplets of condensation with multiple small ice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observations and interview with facility staff and residents, the facility staff failed to protect and value resident's private space (residents #22, #45, #72 & #110). This was evident for 4 out of 75 residents reviewed during a recertification survey. The findings include: On 10/13/21 at 11:30 AM, during the initial tour of the Swan and Egret units, the Surveyor observed several incidents of facility nursing staff failing to protect and value residents' private space by not knocking on resident doors and requesting permission before entering residents' rooms. The Surveyor observed facility staff failing to knock on resident doors and request permission before entering resident's rooms for residents #22, #45, #72 & #110. Interview with resident #110 on 10/14/21 at 10:45 AM revealed that it was normal for facility staff to enter resident #110's room without knocking on the door or asking permission. The surveyor observed facility staff failing to knock on resident #110's room door and request permission before entering on 10/15/21 at 9:15 AM, 10/19/21 at 10:15 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's investigative report, record review, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of resident abuse nor notify law enforcement when a resident reported sexual and physical abuse. This was evident for 2 of 13 residents (Resident #133, #125) reviewed for abuse during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 10/20/2021, Surveyor review of the facility reported incident #MD00138808 revealed that on 4/1/2019 Resident #133 complained to the nurse manager that on Saturday 11-7 shift, resident's Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA # 81) threw a small piece of a diaper tab in their face while receiving incontinence care. Further review of the facility investigation revealed the facility was not able to substantiate the abuse, however the facility failed to do a thorough investigation. The facility failed to interview other staff members or residents during the investigation. Surveyor found written interviews from the resident, the nurse, and GNA #81. GNA #81's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of narcotic change of shift counts, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that narcotic medications were consistently reconciled by two nurses at change of shift. This was evident for 1 (Egret, 400's unit) of 3 nursing units reviewed for accuracy and completeness of controlled medication storage and documentation. The findings include: Narcotic (controlled) medication, due to its potential for abuse and addiction, is required to be thoroughly tracked and accounted for by the facility. This includes but is not limited to an accounting of all narcotics in storage whenever a change of shift among nursing staff occurs. This medication count must be performed by two nursing staff at the same time to verify the counts being conducted. Any discrepancy in the count from what is expected to be found must be addressed immediately. In the course of performing the medication storage facility task, the surveyor reviewed the narcotic count logs for October, 2021, for the Egret unit at [DATE] at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-06-12 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observations and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to serve residents meals that matched their tickets. This was evident for seven (Resident #74, #115, #146, #171, #193, #203 & #251) out of thirty-three residents observed during dining.The findings include: The findings include: On 06/08/2026 at 9:20 AM, during breakfast dining observation, review of meal tickets revealed coffee was listed as part of the beverages for residents. Observation revealed coffee was not served. Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA #24) stated that dietary unit had informed nursing staff that coffee was unavailable because the kitchen did not have coffee cups. 1) On 06/08/2026 at 9:22 AM, Residents #74, #115, #171, #193, and #203 stated they had not received coffee with their breakfast meals. Observation of the residents' meal trays confirmed coffee was not present. Review of each resident's meal ticket revealed coffee was listed as the assigned breakfast beverage. Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA#24), who was present during the observation, stated the residents had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 58 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 58; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIVERVIEW HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 08/01/2019 |
| RIVERVIEW AS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/01/2019 |
| RIVERVIEW HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/01/2019 |
| THE JS TRUST FBO NIECES AND NEPHEW | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/01/2019 |
| DEW, DIANA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 08/01/2019 |
| STERN, SAMUEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/01/2019 |
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $7.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 215203. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.