Landmark of Plaquemine

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 73.0 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.10 on weekdays — 31% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-07-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) notified a nurse of a resident's change in gastrointestinal (parts of the digestive trach) conditions (Resident #56); and, 2. A nurse reported a resident's refusal of supplemental nutrition to the resident's medical provider (Resident #56). This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #56) of 2 (Resident #56, Resident #61) sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings: Review of Resident #56's Care Plan with an effective start date of 08/28/2024 and a next review date of 07/22/2025 revealed, in part, an intervention to administer Resident #56's supplements as ordered. Review of Resident #56's July 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order to administer Resident #56 four (4) ounces (oz) of house supplement (a liquid nutritional supplement) three times a day and 30 milliliters (ml) of liquid protein daily. Review of Resident #56's June 2025 electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) revealed, in part, Resident #56 refused the 4 oz of house…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a palatable temperature as required. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 71 residents who consumed meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings: In an interview on 07/07/25 at 10:45AM, Resident #48 indicated the food served, on the meal tray, in her room was cold and didn't taste good. In an interview on 07/08/2025 at 10:13 AM, Resident #46 indicated the food served, on the meal tray, in his room was cold. In an interview on 07/08/2025 at 10:14AM, Resident #58 indicated the food served, on the meal tray, in her room was cold. Observation on 07/08/2025 at 12:15PM revealed staff members passing meal trays on the hall, from the meal cart that contained Resident #48's meal tray. On 07/08/2025 at 12:15PM, the surveyor selected Resident #48's meal tray from the cart. On 07/08/2025 at 12:17PM the surveyor team tasted the food on Resident #48's meal tray and the beef, potatoes, and carrots were noted to be lukewarm. Observation on 07/08/2025 at 12:19PM, revealed S11Cook tested the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared in a sanitary manner as required. This deficient practice had to potential to affect any of the 71 residents who received meals from the facility. Findings: 1. Observation on [DATE] at 9:20AM revealed S18Cook in the facility's kitchen with a beard and mustache hair approximately 1/4 inch long and had no beard cover. Observation on [DATE] 11:36AM revealed S18Cook with a beard and mustache hair approximately 1/4 inch long cooking potatoes on the grill and had no beard cover. In an interview [DATE] at 11:45AM, S18Cook indicated he did not wear a face/beard cover because the facility doesn't have them available. In an interview on [DATE] at 11:48AM, S10Dietary Manager confirmed S11Cook should have had a face/beard cover on. 2. Observation on [DATE] at 9:12AM of the facility's kitchen's dry storage room revealed 33 packets of blue cheese salad dressing with an expiration date of [DATE]. In an interview on [DATE] at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement a system to consistently and accurately reconcile controlled medications for 1 (Medication Cart a) of 3 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, Medication Cart c) medication carts reviewed for the reconciliation of controlled substances. Findings: Review of the facility's Drug-Controlled Substances policy and procedure, dated 04/2006 and revised on 11/2017, revealed, in part, controlled medications were to be signed out on Form NS-618 Individual Resident Narcotics Record at the time they were administered. Review of Resident #23's Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) for July 2025 revealed, in part, Resident #23 had an order for Modafinil 200 milligram (mg) (a controlled medication used to promote wakefulness) give 1 tablet once daily. Further review revealed S7Licenesed Practical Nurse (LPN) administered Modafinil 200 mg 1 tablet to Resident #23 at 9:00AM. Record review on 07/09/2025 at 1:21PM of Medication Cart a's narcotic binder with S7LPN revealed, in part, Resident #23 had an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal (a bacterial infection caused by Streptococcus pneumonia bacterial) vaccines were administered for 2 (Resident #70, Resident #173) of 5 (Resident #22, Resident #68, Resident #70, Resident #173, Resident #372) sampled residents investigated for pneumococcal vaccines. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccination of Residents, with a revision date of 01/2024 revealed, in part, residents or their resident representative, will be asked upon admission for the resident's pneumococcal vaccination history and the resident's age at the time of the vaccination. The resident's records will also be used to determine the resident's vaccination status. If there is no evidence the resident has received the vaccination, the vaccine will be offered. The administration of the pneumococcal vaccine will be documented in the resident's medical record. Resident #70 Review of Resident #70's vaccine consent form revealed, in part, Resident #70's responsible party signed a consent form for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the COVID-19 (an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) vaccine was administered for 2 (Resident #70, Resident #173 ) of 5 (Resident #22, Resident #68, Resident #70, Resident #173, Resident #372) sampled residents investigated for COVID-19 vaccines. Findings: Review of the facility's Coronavirus (Covid-19) policy, latest revision date 07/2024, revealed in part, all residents would be offered the Covid-19 vaccine upon admission and at least annually thereafter if previously declined. Resident #70 Review of Resident #70's vaccine consent form revealed Resident #70's responsible party signed a consent form for Resident #70 to receive the COVID-19 vaccine on 06/02/2025. Review of Resident #70's physician's orders revealed in part, an order with a revision date of 06/15/2025, stated the Covid-19 vaccine may be administered as recommended with consent. Review of Resident #70 immunization documentation revealed there was no documentation Resident #70 received the Covid-19 vaccine. There was no documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to ensure expired medications were not available for use for 1 (Medication Room a) of 1 (Medication Room a) medication rooms observed during medication storage observations. Findings: Observation on 07/09/2024 at 2:17 p.m. of Medication Room a revealed the following, in part, a bottle of Aspirin 325 milligrams (mg) with an expiration date of 04/2024. Further observation revealed four boxes of Influenza Fluad Quadrivalent (injectable medication use to prevent the flu) with an expiration date of 06/30/2024. In an interview on 07/09/2024 at 2:20 p.m., S3Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) indicated the above mentioned medications should not have been available for resident use. In an interview on 07/09/2024 at 2:55 p.m., S2Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the above mentioned medications should not have been available for use.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's continuous enteral feeding (intake of food through a tube placed into the stomach) was not stopped and restarted by a certified nursing assistant (CNA) for 1 (Resident #228) of 2 (Resident #10 and Resident #228) sampled residents investigated for enteral feeding. Findings: Review of Resident #228's record revealed, in part, an admission date of 06/25/2024 and diagnoses including mild protein-calorie malnutrition and failure to thrive. Review of Resident #228's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/02/2024 revealed, in part, Resident #228 required enteral feeding through a gastrostomy tube (an artificial hole in the stomach to deliver enteral feedings). Review of Resident #228's July 2024 Physician's Orders revealed, in part, an order for Isosource 1.5 calories (a type of enteral feeding formula) at 40 milliliters an hour continuously via a feeding pump. Further review revealed an order to check the placement of Resident #228's gastrostomy tube prior to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based upon observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to assess a resident's respiratory status and provide oxygen (O2) accordingly for 1 (Resident #12) of 1 (Resident #12) sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings: Observation on 07/08/2024 at 12:03 p.m. revealed Resident #12 was wearing a nasal cannula (NC) connected to an oxygen concentrator at 2.5 liters per minute (lpm). Observation on 07/09/2024 at 10:10 a.m. revealed Resident #12 was wearing a nasal cannula (NC) connected to an oxygen concentrator at 2.5 liters per minute (lpm). Observation on 07/10/2024 at 11:31 a.m. revealed Resident #12 was wearing a nasal cannula (NC) connected to an oxygen concentrator at 2.5 liters per minute (lpm). Review of Resident #12's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an order dated 04/23/2024 for oxygen at 2 lpm via NC as needed (PRN) for saturations less than 93 Further review revealed instructions to check and record oxygen saturation levels. Review of Resident #12's electronic medication administration record (EMAR) for May, June, and July 2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff removed gloves and perform hand hygiene prior to exiting a resident's room for 1 (S6Housekeeper) of 1 (S6Housekeeper) housekeepers observed for infection control. Findings: Observation on 07/10/2024 at 1:05 p.m. revealed S6Housekeeper exited the elevator on the first floor by the dining room with her gloves on. Observation further revealed she was the only person on the elevator. In an interview on 07/10/2024 at 1:10 p.m., S6Housekeeper indicated she forgot to take her gloves off after cleaning a resident's room on the second floor. In an interview on 07/10/2024 at 1:15 p.m., S5Housekeeping Supervisor indicated staff should take off gloves and perform hand hygiene when exiting resident rooms. In an interview on 07/10/2024 at 2:27 p.m., S4Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist indicated gloves should be removed and hand hygiene performed when exiting resident rooms. In an interview on 07/10/2024 at 3:50 p.m., S2Director of Nursing confirmed gloves should be removed prior to leaving a resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE BEEBE FAMILY — 48 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $13K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA