Canyon Vista Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 318 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 409 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 69% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 114.2 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.23 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.80 to 1.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kdisputed · IDR2025-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to ensure three of three residents sampled for accidents (Resident 14, 34, and 116) had interventions implemented to identify hazards and risks associated with smoking. The facility failed to ensure: 1) Resident 14 with a lighter and cigarettes did not attempt to put a used cigarette in a trash can within the resident's room, 2) Resident 34 was a documented smoker with an Oxygen Concentrator (a device delivering up to 95 percent Oxygen, Oxygen when in contact with flammable materials through heat can cause severe burns) in the resident's room, and 3) a non-smoking policy and procedure was enforced when Resident 116 (R116) took out a black lighter from the left chest pocket. The deficient practice had the potential to result in fire hazards and compromise the safety of all residents and staff in the facility. During the extended survey, the sample was expanded to include an additional four smoking residents (Resident 188, 189, 190 and 320).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure:1) medications were not left on a resident's breakfast tray and documented as administered without direct observation of ingestion for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 96);2) medications were not pre-charted as administered prior to actual administration for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 153); and3) nephrostomy care was not documented as completed without actual provision of care for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 77).The deficient practice had the potential to compromise quality of care provided to residents.Findings include:1)Resident 96 (R96) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including transient cerebral ischemic attack and polyneuropathy.On 04/07/2026 at 8:34 AM, R96 sat up in bed eating breakfast, a medication cup containing eight pills was observed on the meal tray. R96 indicated the nurse left it there so R96 could take the medication when they were ready. R96 stated, I know they are busy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
  Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure care orders for nephrostomy tubes were followed for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident 77). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for infection.Findings include: 1)Resident 96 (R96) was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including transient cerebral ischemic attack and polyneuropathy.On 04/07/2026 at 8:34 AM, R96 sat up in bed eating breakfast, a medication cup containing eight pills was observed on the meal tray. R96 indicated the nurse left it there so R96 could take the medication when they were ready. R96 stated, I know they are busy and I am still eating my breakfast.On 04/07/2026 at 8:37 AM, the Registered Nurse (RN1) assigned to R96 acknowledged leaving the medication cup on R96's meal tray and identified the pills including:Aspirin, Vitamin B complex, Biotin, Carvedilol, Duloxetine, Ezetimibe, Lisinopril, and Multivitamins and minerals.RN1 displayed R96's electronic health record (EHR) and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were not expired, properly dated, labeled, and discarded as required from the refrigerator for 3 of 4 nourishment rooms inspected. This deficient practice had the potential to result in foodborne illness, affecting the health and safety of residents. Findings include: On 04/07/2026 at 8:30 AM, an inspection of the 400-hall nourishment room refrigerator revealed resident food items with an expiry date of 03/03/2026. On 04/07/2026 at 8:32 AM, an inspection of the 100-hall nourishment room, refrigerator revealed resident food an expiry date of 04/03/2026 and an unlabeled resident food item.On 04/07/2026 at 8:35 AM, an inspection of the hall-200 nourishment room, refrigerator revealed six milk cartons expiry date of 03/05/2026. On 04/07/2026 at 11:47 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), verified the resident food had expired and should have been discarded. The ADON confirmed the additional resident food items did not have a label and expressed that the food items should have been labeled before being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the trash compactor was sealed, in good repair, and free of leaks, foul odors, and accumulated liquid waste. The deficient practice created the potential for unsanitary conditions, foul odors and pest infestation. Findings include: On 04/07/2026 at 8:10 AM, an inspection of the facility's kitchen revealed a trash compactor with a foul smell and various leaks that traveled throughout the side and bottom of the trash compactor. On 04/07/2026 at 8:16 AM, the head cook confirmed the compactor had a known leak and verbalized the area needed to be cleaned due to a safety hazard and a present foul odorOn 04/07/2026 at 8:22 AM, the Maintenance Director verified the trash compactor had a leak and confirmed the trash compactor needed to be replaced. On 04/08/2026 at 1:48 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), confirmed the trash compactor was not in sanitary condition and had a leak with a present odor, which would cause a pest concern. The facility policy titled Sanitization (undated) documented, areas…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was available in the laundry room for staff handling soiled linens. This deficient practice had the potential to expose staff and residents to contaminants from soiled linens and increased the risk of transmission of infectious organisms in a facility with active resident infections.Findings include:A Daily Overview Summary Report (undated) listed 18 confirmed, current resident infections in the facility, including Clostridioides difficile (C. diff), wound infections, and cellulitis.On 04/08/2026 at 2:36 PM, an inspection of the laundry room revealed gowns (PPE) were not available for staff use.On 04/08/2026, a laundry aide, confirmed that gowns were not available in the laundry room for staff use. The laundry aide indicated gowns would need to be obtained from another area of the facility and pointed toward the resident room areas and hallways. On 04/06/2026 at 2:26 PM, the Infection Preventionist (IP), confirmed gowns were not available in the laundry…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0573 — isolated
  Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Release of Information policy included a defined time frame for providing resident medical records when requested. The deficient practice had the potential to delay access to a resident's medical records.Findings include: A home health agency (HHA) requested medical records on 05/01/2025 for resident 4 (R4). A second request was made on 05/20/2025. Medical records were electronically sent to the HHA on 05/20/2025 and 05/21/2025. On 12/05/2025 at 9:37 AM, the Medical Records Director explained no medical records would not have been released without a request. Once a request was received, staff documented a note in the including details of the portion of the record provided. The Medical Records Director was unsure if other staff had documented the requests. Medical records were usually provided the same day they were requested. The Medical Records Director indicated there were no documented requests for medical records, and no phone calls from a HHA regarding R4. The Medical Records Director confirmed that both…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and documentation review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the discharge medication list and education about the medication was provided for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 5). This failure had the potential to lead to medication errors and adverse drug reactions causing resident harm. Findings include: Resident 5 (R5) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 06/20/2025, with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, and sepsis. The facility was unable to provide documentation of a discharged medication list or education regarding the medications released to R5 upon discharge. On 12/05/2025 at 9:37AM, the registered nurse indicated residents could ask their pharmacy or call the facility back if they were unsure of their medications or prescriptions after discharge. On 12/05/2025 at 9:54AM, the social services assistant explained it was the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure that opened items in the refrigerator and freezer were properly labeled and discarded upon expiration per policy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the serving of expired or improperly stored food items to residents, potentially leading to foodborne illness. Findings include: On 02/25/25 at 7:51 AM, during an initial brief inspection of the kitchen, the surveyor, accompanied by the Director of Dietary Services, observed the following inside the walk-in refrigerator: a large bin of chopped onions dated 02/17/2025, a half-cut large tomato wrapped in plastic wrap without a label, and a large plastic bin of canned fruits that was unlabeled. The Director of Dietary Services confirmed the observation and indicated the opened items should have been discarded within five days but had not been removed as required. An inspection of the walk-in freezer revealed an undated chocolate cream pie in a foil container had been opened and cut in half. The Director of Dietary Services confirmed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to develop and implement baseline care plan for: 1) safety interventions for the care of 4 of 5 residents who smoke (Residents # 188, 189, 190, and 320), 2) interventions to address communication issues for 2 resident with communication deficit related to language barrier (Resident #171 and 324), and 3) interventions for the care of a peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter (Resident #325). Findings include: Resident #188 (R188) R188 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including nicotine dependence and major depressive disorder. admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R188 had an intact cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. The MDS assessment documented R188 was a tobacco user. R188 medical record lacked documented evidence a baseline care plan was developed and implemented to address R188's smoking habits. Resident #189 (R189) R189 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans to reflect new interventions, specifically, a smoking care plan for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 14, 34, and 116). The deficient practice had the potential to deprive residents of necessary interventions to maintain overall well-being. Findings include: Resident 14 (R14) R14 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia (a serious mental condition affecting thought, resulting in a mix of disorganized thinking and behavior), depression (a mental disorder resulting in loss of pleasure or interest in activities, hopelessness about the future, or thoughts of dying or suicide), and suicidal ideations (thoughts or ideas centered around death or suicide). Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/17/2025, indicated R14 was moderately impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$35,016 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $35,016 — penalty dated 2025-03-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NV