Trellis Centennial

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 408 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 77.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 246 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 67.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.47 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.58 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.58 to 1.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2025-05-09 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to develop a care plan, monitor behaviors, and provide behavioral health services for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 215). Specifically, the facility failed to document the resident's hospital-diagnosed anxiety as an active medical condition, develop a baseline care plan addressing behavioral health interventions for anxiety, and implement timely interventions until after the resident expressed suicidal ideation. This deficient practice resulted in psychosocial harm as evidenced by the resident's reported feelings of suicidal ideations. Findings include: Resident 215 (R215) R215 had been admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and heart failure. A Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] documented discharge diagnosis including COPD with acute exacerbation, shortness of breath, pneumonia, hypertension, and anxiety. R215's Physician History and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review the facility failed to ensure nursing documentation accurately reflected the care provided. Nursing staff documented splint care was completed when the care had not been performed for 1 of 32 sampled residents (Resident 54). The deficient practice placed the residents are risk of not receiving ordered treatment interventions and inaccurate documentation of care provided.Findings include:Resident 54 (R54) was admitted [DATE], with diagnosis including fracture of left radius subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, nondisplaced fracture of left ulna styloid process, dementia, and cognitive communication deficit.A physician order dated 04/24/2026 documented, treatment: splint site, left wrist, check circulation and motion sensation every shift. On 05/07/2026 at 12:00 PM, R54 was lying in bed with eyes closed. R54's left arm was visible. No splint was observed on R54's left wrist or on visible surfaces within R54's room.On 05/07/2026 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for a resident's suprapubic catheter for 1 of 32 sampled residents (Resident 6). The deficient practice placed residents at risk of catheter complications such as infection and trauma.Findings include:R6 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dementia and urinary tract infection (UTI). The admission nursing assessment dated [DATE], revealed R6 was admitted with a French (Fr) 16 (diameter size)/10 milliliter (ml) balloon suprapubic catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted in the lower abdomen into the bladder to drain urine).A physician order dated 04/11/2026, documented suprapubic catheter Fr 16/10 ml balloon due to neurogenic bladder. Monitor every shift. Change if dislodged, leaked or plugged.A physician order dated 04/11/2026, documented suprapubic catheter: cleanse site with warm soap and water and rinse. Pat dry and apply T-dressing everyday…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's infection status was communicated to the dialysis provider for 1 of 32 sampled residents (Resident 93). The deficient practice placed the community at risk for transmission.Findings include:R93 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including enterocolitis due to Clostridium difficile and end-stage renal disease (ESRD).On 05/05/2026 at 10:20 AM, there was a contact isolation precautions signage outside R93's room. Two certified nursing assistants (CNAs) were observed putting on gowns and gloves prior to entering room. The CNAs indicated R93 had loose stools and possibly had Clostridium difficile (C. diff - a highly contagious bacterial infection characterized by severe diarrhea from colon inflammation often caused by antibiotic use).On 05/05/2026 at 10:48 AM, R93 indicated being treated for C. diff at the hospital but had been having loose stools and staff informed the resident they would be testing for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure: 1) The shared glucometer device was disinfected using Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-approved disinfectant wipes for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 171). 2) Handwashing with soap and water was performed before and after entering the room of a resident on contact isolation for Clostridium difficile (C. diff) for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 166) and required personal protective equipment (PPE) was donned when entering rooms in contact isolation precautions in 2 of 2 units. This deficient practice had the potential to expose residents to bloodborne pathogens and other infectious agents, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and facility-acquired infections. Findings include: 1) Resident 171 (R171) R171 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. On 05/08/2025 at 9:12 AM, during the medication pass, a Registered Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · No revisit needed
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan for anticoagulant use was formulated and a physician order was obtained for monitoring the resident while on anticoagulant (blood thinning) therapy for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 166). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unrecognized bleeding complications, delayed medical intervention, and serious adverse outcomes such as internal bleeding, hospitalization, or death. Findings include: Resident 166 (R166) R166 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia, Parkinson's disease, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented R166 had an anticoagulant with indication. The History and Physical dated 04/28/2025, documented the plan was to administer Lovenox for deep vein thrombosis (blood clot). A Physician order dated 04/28/2025, documented Lovenox injection solution prefilled syringe 40 milligrams (mg) 4 milliliters (ml).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · No revisit needed
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for the use of Oxygen (O2) and corresponding care instructions were obtained for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 166). This deficient practice had the potential to result in improper administration of O2 therapy, increased risk of respiratory complications, and failure to monitor the resident's response to treatment. Findings include: Resident 166 (R166) R166 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with exacerbation, acute respiratory failure, and dementia. On 05/06/2025 at 9:50 AM, R166 was in bed, verbally responsive with garbled words. R166 was on O2 flowing at 1 liter per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula, with no humidifier in place. R166 had mild shortness of breath. The admission assessment dated [DATE], documented R166's respiratory status included crackling sounds. The admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented the brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · No revisit needed
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was administered per the physician order and physician order obtained for pain level rated 4-6/10 using the numerical pain scale 0-10 (0= no pain and 10= worst pain) for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 265). The deficient practice had the potential to lead to inadequate pain management, an increased risk of adverse effects, and compromised patient safety. Findings include: Resident 265 (R265) R265 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis of right and left lower limb, muscle weakness, and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. A physician order dated 04/21/2025 documented: Pain- PRN (as needed) Pain Scale 0-10: 0= No Pain 1-2= Least Pain 3-4= Mild Pain 5-6= Moderate Pain 7-8= Severe Pain 9-10= Very Severe/Horrible/Worst pain. A Physician order dated 04/21/2025 documented Tylenol tablet 325 milligram (MG) give two tablets by mouth every six hours as needed for mild pain rated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · No revisit needed
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence the residents were provided assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for 2 of 4 sampled residents (R1 and R2). The deficient practice had the potential for the residents' skin integrity to be compromised. Findings include: Resident 1 (R1) R1 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 09/02/2024, with diagnoses including muscle weakness and displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur. R1's Care Plan documented the resident had self-care deficit as evidenced by needing assistance with ADLs related to pain. The following activities/tasks were identified in the resident's care plan: - Oral hygiene - partial/moderate assistance - Toileting hygiene - dependent - Personal hygiene - substantial/maximal assistance On 11/20/2024 at 12:57 PM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) indicated the residents were assisted with ADLs such as toileting and hygiene. The assistance provided should have been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's weight was taken and recorded upon admission for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 4). This failure could have compromised the nutritional and medical well-being of the resident. Findings include: Resident (R4) R4 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dysphasia, chronic kidney disease stage I -IV, and diabetes mellitus. R4's Nutritional Risk Assessment, and vital signs and weight report dated 9/16/2024, documented R4's most recent weight was 156.2 pounds. R4's weight was obtained six days after admission. The medical record lacked documented evidence R4's weight was obtained upon admission. On 11/20/2024 at 3:30 PM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) explained all new admissions were weighed by a CNA initially, then by Occupational Therapy the next day before providing services. On 11/20/2024 at 3:40 PM, a Charge Nurse (CN) expressed the initial weights must be completed upon arrival to complete the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3) TED hose (compression stockings) Resident 43 (R43) R43 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, morbid obesity, and spondylosis of cervical region. A physician's order dated 05/13/2024, documented thrombo-embolic deterrent (TED) hose on bilateral legs two times a day for edema on for 12 hours, off for 12 hours. On 06/04/2024 at 8:55 AM, R43 laid alert in a bariatric specialty mattress. The resident was not covered with blanket which revealed edema on bilateral lower extremities, R43 was not wearing TED hose. There was no TED hose observed in the resident's room. On 06/05/24 at 8:50 AM, R43 laid in bed with a fully consumed breakfast tray on bedside table. R43 indicated having a history of wearing compression stockings for edema in the past but had not used compression stockings since admission to this facility in March 2024. According to the resident, use of TED hose was discussed with R43 a few weeks ago but no one had followed through, discussed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-05-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $938K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NV