Unger Park Post Acute
1170 W Mansfield Street, Bucyrus, OH 44820 · For profit - Corporation · 86 certified beds · (419) 562-9907 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Jul 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.0% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.1% | 0.4% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 60.3% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.8% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.0% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 3.4% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.3% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.8% | 8.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 69.6% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.1% | 24.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 24.3% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.41 | 1.73 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.74 | 1.80 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.6%CMS range 36.0–58.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 5.2–14.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 2.8–13.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 66.3 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of the beneficiary notification documentation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided the required Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN). This affected four (#2, #41, #76, and #77) of four residents reviewed for required beneficiary notices. The facility census was 67.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/16/26. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bipolar disorder, rheumatoid arthritis, muscle wasting and atrophy, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia.Review of Resident #2's Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15.Review of Resident #2's Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review document…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was sanitary, failed to ensure food was labeled and dated when opened, and further failed to ensure the dishwasher was washing and rinsing per manufacturer guidelines. This had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified one (#72) resident who did not receive meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 67.Findings include:1. Observation during initial tour of the kitchen on 04/27/26 at 8:08 A.M. revealed a plastic tray containing clean pitchers had a brown-like substance on the tray. Three open, three shelve carts with wheels had crumbs and debris on the shelves which contained insulated plate lids, sleeves of plastic lids, sleeves of bowls, and sleeves of cups. Three trays of juice on the left side of the reach in refrigerator and three trays of juice on the right side of the reach in refrigerator were unlabeled and not dated. Observation of the walk in refrigerator revealed a plastic baggie of bologna with a freeze date of 03/03/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore personal protective equipment during high contact resident care for residents requiring enhanced barrier precautions. This affected three (#23, #72, #75) of four residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions and had the potential to affect nine residents (#4, #9, #11, #14, #18, #23, #28, #72, and #75) on enhanced barrier precautions. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene during wound care was completed. This affected one (#28) of one resident reviewed for wound care. The facility identified five residents requiring wound care. The facility census was 67. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 12/21/24. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and urinary retention. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was maintained in a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment. This affected two residents (#46 and #56) and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Observation on 04/29/26 at 10:40 A.M. of Resident's #46 and #56's bedroom revealed wallpaper to be peeling from the wall in multiple areas including behind the each of the resident's headboards, below the window, and near the baseboards. There was also a black substance noted to be around the base of the toilet in the bathroom.Interview on 04/29/26 at 10:45 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #175 verified the peeling wallpaper in Resident's #46 and #56's bedroom as well as the black substance around the base of the toilet. Furthermore, concurrent observation and interview with CNA #175 verified in the C hall restroom, the three light covers were cracked/broken.Review of the facility policy titled Homelike Environment with a revision date of February 2021 revealed residents are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure female residents were shaved. This affected one (#75) of one resident reviewed for shaving. The facility also failed to ensure residents in the dining room were fed in a dignified manner. This affected one (#45) of one resident observed for feeding. The facility identified seven residents (#6, #12, #27, #45, #60, #66, and #74) who required assistance with feeding. The facility census was 67.Findings include:1. Review of medical record for Resident #75 revealed an admission date of 08/17/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to paranoid schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, and the need for assistance with personal care.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #75 required partial/moderate assistance for bathing/showering and setup or clean-up assistance for personal hygiene.Review of shower documentation for 04/24/26 and 04/28/26 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent before treatment with psychotropic medications. This affected one (#26) of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medications and has the potential to affect 31 (#2, #5, #7, #12, #13, #14, #17, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #32, #33, #34, #35, #39, #40, #42, #43, #45, #46, #47, #49, #51, #55, #56, #59, #60, #62, and #75) residents that the facility identified as receiving psychotropic medications. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted [DATE] and had diagnoses that included morbid obesity, type II diabetes mellitus, and a fracture of left femur. Review of Resident #26's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment submitted 4/15/26 revealed Resident #26 was cognitively intact.Review of the medical record for Resident #26 found active physician orders for the administration of two psychotropic medications. One order dated 04/08/26 was for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, staff interview, review of the Resident Council meeting minutes, review of the concern/grievance log, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely response and follow-up of resident concerns. This affected one (#3) of two residents reviewed for personal property. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 11/19/18. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes dated 01/26/26, 02/25/26, 03/26/26, and 04/26/26 revealed no documentation of Resident #3 reporting missing clothing items. Resident #3 was documented as present at the Resident Council meeting on 02/25/26.Review of the grievance/concern log dated 01/01/26 through 04/26/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment by failing to ensure the dining room ceiling was intact and without holes. This affected one (#28) of five residents reviewed for environment. The facility also failed to ensure a homelike dining experience for the 14 (#2, #3, #5, #14, #16, #17, #20, #28, #43, #45, #52, #53, #56, and #59) residents who routinely ate meals in the dining room and further failed to provide comfortable and well-fitting bed linens for Resident #10. The facility census was 67.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 06/13/25. Diagnoses included dementia, congestive heart failure and type 2 diabetes. Review of Resident #28's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 had moderate cognitive impairment. Observation of the dining room ceiling occurred about 3:10 P.M. on 4/28/26. A missing tile in the drop ceiling created…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate adverse effect monitoring for a resident using psychotropic medications. This affected one (#26) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary and psychotropic medications. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 04/08/26, diagnoses included morbid obesity, type II diabetes, and fracture of left femur. Review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 was cognitively intact.Review of the medical record for Resident #26 found current physician orders for the administration of two psychotropic medications. One order dated 04/08/26 was for buspirone (an antianxiety agent) 5 milligrams (mg) two times a day for anxiety. Another order dated 04/09/26 was for duloxetine (an antidepressant) 60 mg at bedtime for depression. Resident #26 was also had an ordered dated 04/08/26 for behavior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure bed hold notices and transfer notices were given to residents. This affected one (#68) of one resident reviewed for bed hold notices and transfer notices. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of medical record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 08/17/26 with diagnoses including but not limited to paranoid schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, hypertension, and cognitive communication deficit.Review of census lines revealed the resident went to the hospital from [DATE] to 08/17/25, 08/25/25 to 08/26/25, 01/13/26 to 01/20/26, and 04/10/26 to 04/22/26.Review of bed hold notices dated 08/15/25 and 08/25/25 revealed the resident signed both forms on the day sent to the hospital.Review of bed notices dated 01/13/26 and 04/10/26 revealed the forms were not signed and there was blank certified mail labels stapled to the forms.No transfer notices could be located by the facility for any of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were timely initiated and revised for new wounds. This affected one (#28) of one resident reviewed for wound care. The facility identified five residents with wounds. The facility census was 67. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 06/13/25. Diagnoses included dementia, depressive disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, anxiety, and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident was dependent on staff for bed mobility, toileting, and transfers. Review of a wound nurse practitioner progress note dated 04/22/26 revealed the resident had a diabetic ulcer to the left heel measuring one centimeter (cm) in length, one cm in width, with an undetermined depth. The wound was 100 percent scabbed and crusted with no exudate and described as dry and callused with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a procedure was in place to determine which residents required ancillary services. This affected one (#51) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 67.Findings include:Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/04/25. Diagnoses included muscle wasting and atrophy, type two diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, and ataxia. Review of Resident #51's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Furthermore, Resident #51 did not have dental pain. Review of Resident #51's care plan dated 02/08/26 revealed Resident #51 was at risk for difficulty chewing related to broken teeth with interventions that included dental consultation and follow-up as indicated and to notify the physician of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespreadNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, review of employee files, review of the Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI) log and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure employee background checks were completed prior to employment. This had the potential to affect all 56 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 56.Findings include:Review of Dietary Aide (DA) #238's employee file revealed a start date of 02/16/25. Further review revealed no evidence a BCI check was completed for DA #238.Review of the facility's BCI log revealed DA #238 was not logged as having a background check completed. Interview on 07/15/25 at 1:28 P.M. with Human Resource Director (HRD) #253 verified DA #238 did not have a background check completed. Review of the facility policy titled, Background Screening Investigations, revised March 2019, revealed the facility conducted employment background screening checks, reference checks, and criminal conviction investigation checks on all applicants for positions with direct access to residents. Direct access employee meant any individual who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, review of the facility's infection control logs, review of facility in-services, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to prevent and respond to an increased pattern of urinary tract infections (UTIs). This affected two (#16 and #60) of two residents reviewed for UTIs. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, shortness of breath, asthma, dysphagia, need for assistance with personal care, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, adult failure to thrive, osteoarthritis, infestation, low back pain, hypertension, anxiety, and bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified Resident #16 was cognitively intact. The resident was frequently incontinent of urine and occasionally incontinent of bowel. Review of the infection control logs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were completed timely. This affected six residents (#05, #07, #08, #12, #19, #29, and #45) of the 19 residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1) Review of medical record for Resident #07 revealed an admission date of 05/12/17 with diagnoses including but not limited to hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral vascular accident (CVA/stroke) affecting non-dominant right side, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, and altered mental status. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #07 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of progress notes including social service notes for Resident #07, revealed no documented evidence care conferences were held in May 2024 or August of 2024. 2) Review of medical record for Resident #08 revealed an admission date of 01/18/15 with diagnoses including but not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, review of the activity calendar, and policy review the facility failed to ensure activities on memory care unit met the needs and preferences of the residents. This affected all 13 residents (#02, #04, #11, #13, #19, #24, #35, #40, #41, #46, #58, #174, and #175) on the memory care unit. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #04, revealed an admission date of 01/15/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia with other behavioral disturbance, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of care plan dated 10/16/24, revealed Resident #04 had the potential for decreased activity participation, involvement and or social isolation related to illness/disease process, immobility, and impaired decision making. Interventions included assist with arranging community activities and arrange transportation, encourage attendance and participation in activities, if the resident is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of physician and nurse practitioner (NP) progress notes, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure physician visits were completed as required. This affected five (#60, #04, #12, #29, and #45) of the nine residents reviewed for physician visits. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included fibromyalgia, hypokalemia, hyperlipidemia, spinal stenosis, anxiety, upper abdominal pain, nausea with vomiting, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, diverticulitis of intestine, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, chronic pain syndrome, unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, pain in right leg, pain in left leg, difficulty walking, and depression. Resident #60 was cognitively intact. Further review of the medical record, revealed Resident #60 was seen by the NP monthly from 02/29/24 through 12/16/24. There was no evidence of a physician visit with Resident #60 from 02/26/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received food that was palatable and appetizing to them and which met their nutritional recommendations. This affected four (#57, #05, #62 and #61) residents out of the four residents reviewed for lunch. This had the potential to affect all but one resident (#174) who was identified by the facility as not receiving meals from the kitchen. The census was 74. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #57, revealed an admission date of 01/16/24. The resident was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and unspecified convulsions. Resident #57 was cognitively intact. Review of medical record for Resident #05, revealed an admission date of 09/30/21. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and morbid obesity. Review of medical record for Resident #62, revealed an admission date of 05/08/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary condition. This affected all but one resident (#174) who was identified by the facility as not receiving meals from the kitchen. The census was 74. Findings Include: Observation of the kitchen on 12/16/24 at 10:59 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #333, revealed the wall across from dishwasher had splattered food debris all over it and parts of the wall were chipping. Interview with DM #333 at the same time, verified the findings. Observation of the kitchen on 12/16/24 at 11:20 A.M. with DM #333, revealed the ventilation hood above the clean pan rack and stove top has paint strips hanging down from it. DM #333 verified the findings and stated someone cleaned too hard and now paint is hanging down. Follow up observation of the kitchen on 12/18/24 at 11:14 A.M. with District Manager #666, revealed the white paint strips were chipping from the ventilation hood above the stove top and clean dish rack. Interview with District Manager #666 at the same time verified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the kitchens walk-in cooler and reach-in cooler were working in a safe operable condition. This had the potential to affect all but one resident (#174) who was identified by the facility as not receiving meals from the kitchen. The census was 74. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 12/16/24 at 10:04 A.M. with the Dietary Manager (DM) #333, revealed the reach-in cooler had an ambient internal temperature of 44 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Interview with DM #333 at the same time, verified the reach-in cooler was 44 degrees F. Observation of the kitchen on 12/16/24 at 10:09 A.M. with DM #333, revealed the walk-in cooler had an ambient internal temperature of 47 degrees F. Interview with DM #333 at the same time verified the walk-in cooler was 47 degrees F. Observation of the walk-in cooler on 12/16/24 at 10:17 A.M. with DM #333, revealed the following temperatures: a) The cottage cheese was 44 degrees F. b) The cream cheese was 47 degrees F. c) The whole milk was 45 degrees F.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the code status matched the medical record and the physician's order. This affected one (#12) of the 19 residents reviewed for code status. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 11/19/18 with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type two diabetes, congestive heart failure, narcolepsy, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, convulsions, depression, bipolar disorder, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of Advanced Directives in the hard/paper chart for signed and dated 10/23/24 for Resident #12, revealed a code status document of Do Not Resituate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCCA). Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact. Review of the physician orders in the electronic medical record (EMR) dated 12/16/24 for Resident #12, revealed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This affected one (#37) of two residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety, heart failure, and weakness. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified Resident #37 was cognitively intact. The resident was always continent of bladder and bowel. An interview on 12/16/24 at 2:53 P.M. with Resident #37, revealed the bathroom was not thoroughly cleaned on a regular basis. Observation at the same time with Resident #37, revealed there was dried feces on the lower left side of the toilet. There was also a towel on the floor on the left side of the toilet, and a brown paper towel behind the toilet. A follow-up observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to administer tube feedings in accordance with physician orders. This affected one (#130) of the one resident reviewed for administration of tube feedings. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #130 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, shock, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, pleural effusion, diverticulitis of intestine, thrombocytopenia, other disorders of electrolyte and fluid imbalance, acute embolism and thrombosis of left femoral vein, cutaneous abscess, altered mental status, obstructive and reflux uropathy. Review of Resident #130's physician orders identified an order dated 12/08/24 for Osmolite 1.2 Cal (nutritional supplement) oral liquid give 80 milliliters (mL) per hour via nasogastric tube (NG) one time per day, turn on at 6:00 P.M. and turn off at 6:00 A.M. The resident also had an order dated 12/09/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide medications as ordered by the physician which resulted in significant medication errors. This affected one (#29) of one resident reviewed for insulin. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 10/25/21 with diagnoses including but not limited to disorders of muscle, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes, panic disorder, major depressive disorder, chronic pain, arthritis, depression, anxiety, and claustrophobia. Review of Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #29 was cognitively intact. Review of the active physician orders for Resident #29, revealed an order for Humulin 70/30 (insulin) KwikPen subcutaneous (SQ) pen injector give 88 units SQ on time a day at 8:00 A.M. If blood sugar (BS) is greater than 150 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) then increase the supper dose by two units. If less than 100 mg/dL then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of Self Reported Incidents (SRI), review of facility investigations, review of the local police report, and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to prevent an inappropriate resident to resident altercation that was sexual in nature. This affected one resident (#105) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #105 revealed an admission date of 11/21/24. The resident was discharged on 11/25/24. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other cerebrovascular disease affecting the right dominant side, cerebrovascular disease, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, and type two diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease. The resident was only admitted for a short term respite stay. Review of the Discharge Return Not Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/25/24, revealed Resident #105 did not have a brief interview for mental status (BIMS), cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were fully ingested and not left at the bedside. This affected one resident (#21) and had the potential to affect eight residents (#65, #20, #45, #6, #31, #68, #57, and #60) the facility identified as independently mobile and cognitively impaired residing on the memory care unit. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 01/15/24 with diagnoses of Alzheimer and dementia with behavior disturbance. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #21 revealed she is cognitively impaired. Review of the care plan revised 07/24 for Resident #21 revealed she had impaired cognitive function and impaired thought process related to dementia. Review of the current physician orders for 07/24 for Resident #21 revealed for the morning medications she was to receive Actos (thiazolidinediones)15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dishes and utensils were sanitized properly. This had the potential to affect 64 residents that received meals from the facility. One resident (#1) of 65 residents received nothing by mouth. The census was 65. Findings include: Observation on 02/14/24 at 10:30 A.M., of the high temperature dish machine with Dietary Manager (DM) #203 revealed the dish machine registered 158 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for the wash cycle and 178 degrees F for the final rinse. Interviews with Dietary Aide (DA) #244, at the time of the observation, stated she had never seen the final rinse dish machine temperature at 180 degrees F. The temperatures were verified by DM #203 at the time of observation. Observation on 02/14/24 at 3:55 P.M., dish machine was at proper temperature for the final rinse. Review of the dish machine log for February 2024 revealed that the final rinse temperature for the dish machine was not at the required 180 degrees F for 02/12/24 and 02/13/24. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-15 · tag F0887 — widespreadEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the COVID-19 vaccination/booster and provided education on vaccinations. This affected three (#8, #15, and #69) of five reviewed for vaccination. Additionally, the facility failed to have a policy and procedure related to residents receiving the COVID-19 Vaccination, which affected all facility residents. Findings census was 65. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 08/24/21. Diagnoses included stroke, hepatic failure, diabetes, schizophrenia, depressions and anemia. Review of the vaccination records revealed Resident #15 was given the COVID-19 vaccination (2 dose) dated 12/09/21 and 01/07/22. Chart review revealed no evidence of the COVID-19 vaccination booster was offered and no evidence education was provided in relation to risks and benefits of receiving the COVID vaccine booster. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 09/12/23. Diagnoses included dementia, obesity, stenosis of coronary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/24/21, with diagnoses of stroke, schizophrenia, major depression and anemia. Review of Resident #8's activities plan of care identified she enjoys cards, games (rummy and Bingo) art/crafts, coloring, computer/tablet games, cooking, country music, religious involvement, travel, outings, movies, parties and socials events. The plan identified she needs assistance to and from activities. Observations on 02/12/24 at 7:41 P.M. and 02/13/23 at 11:25 A.M., revealed Resident #8 was awake and staring at the television in the room. Resident #8's room was observed to have no independent items in the room to do activities. The room had no games, coloring books and or radio to enjoy her identified preferred activities. Review of the facility's activity calendar dated 02/13/24 identified at 2:00 P.M., for a Mardi gras party. Observation on 02/13/24 at 2:05 P.M., revealed Resident #8 was in bed. Resident #8 was asked if she would like to attend the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to serve pureed foods at a smooth consistency for safe swallowing. This potentially affected nine residents, eight who were prescribed puree diets (#8, #12, #28, #40, #44, #58, #65 and #224) and one resident (#59) who was prescribed meat must be pureed. The census was 65. Findings include: Interview on 02/13/24 at 11:09 A.M., with Dietary Manager (DM) #203 revealed the kitchen used premade molds for most food items but on 12/14/24 they will puree a cold ham sandwich for the lunch meal. Observation of puree preparation on 12/14/24 at 10:50 A.M., revealed [NAME] #209 pureed ham salad for lunch. Taste test revealed that the pureed ham had small pieces of ham in it. DM #203 tasted the pureed ham salad and told [NAME] #209 to puree the meat more. [NAME] #209 pureed the ham salad more and pieces of the rind that were found. Pureed ham was at proper consistency prior to service at 11:15 A.M. Review of the policy titled Diet and Nutrition Care Manual- Dysphagia Puree (Level 1) Diet, dated 2015, revealed all pureed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, Centers for Disease Control Prevention (CDC) guideline review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered vaccinations and provided education on vaccinations. This affected two (#8 and #15) for influenza (flu) vaccines and one (#13) for pneumococcal (pneumonia) vaccines of five residents reviewed for vaccines. Findings census was 65. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 08/24/21. Diagnoses included stroke, hepatic failure, diabetes, schizophrenia, depressions and anemia. Review of the vaccination records revealed no evidence of the flu vaccinations being offered, refused or accepted for the 2023 flu season. Chart review also revealed no evidence that education was provided in relation to risks and benefits of receiving the flu vaccine. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 09/12/23. Diagnoses included dementia, obesity, stenosis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, resident interview, and staff interview, facility failed to ensure resident and/or a representative and members of the interdisciplinary team were included in the quarterly care conferences. This affected one (#13) of two residents reviewed for care conferences. Facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 11/19/18. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes type two, heart failure, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was cognitively intact. Review of the interdisciplinary care conference notes dated 03/21/23 revealed no indication of resident POA being included in the meeting or discussion. Review of the interdisciplinary care conference dated 06/28/23, 09/28/23, and 12/28/23, revealed no evidence that any member of the interdisciplinary team participated in the quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and accessible for two (#12 and #34) residents. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a resident (#6) was provided the opportunity to smoke or the necessary interventions to cease smoking. This affected three (#6, #12 and #34) of 65 residents reviewed for accomodation of needs. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/12/18, with diagnoses including to diabetes mellitus, dementia, and trigeminal neuralgia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance for activities of daily living. Review of the care plan dated 10/19/23 revealed that Resident #34 was at risk for falls with the intervention of call light within reach when in room. Observation on 02/12/24 at 7:22 P.M., of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolatedHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, review of a facility self reported incident (SRI), resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to promote and facilitate a resident to have visitors of their choosing and where they want to meet. This affected one (#8) of 18 sampled for residents rights. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/24/21, with medical diagnoses including: stroke, schizophrenia, major depression and anemia. Review of the most recent annual assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #8's plan of care identified she will visit with her sons in a common area. The record and plan of care identified no reason to require Resident #8 to visit family in a common area. Review of Resident #8's nurse notes dated 02/08/24 at 7:13 P.M., documented two of her children had come to visit. The notes documented Resident #8 did not want to get out of bed as she just got back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had an accurate code status documented in the medical record. This affected one (#5) of two reviewed for advanced directives. Facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 10/23/18. Diagnoses included diabetes type two, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, legal blindness, and muscle weakness. Review of a paper/ hard chart revealed physician order dated 10/24/18 revealed an order for full code. Review of the paper (hard copy) medical record revealed a code status of full code with a bright colored paper Review of the electronic medical record revealed a code status of DNRCC-A (do not resuscitate comfort care arrest) Interview on 02/13/24 at 10:30 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #269 and Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed code status did not match between the electronic and paper medical record. They revealed the paper chart had full code orders and colored directive and the electronic record had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Sets (MDS) and fall risk assessments were completed accurately. This affected three (#8, #29, #68) of 18 sampled residents assessments reviewed. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/06/22. Review of the annual MDS dated [DATE] under section K; identified Resident #29 had significant weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% in the last 6 months. Review of Resident #29's weights in the previous 6 months revealed on 05/01/23 her weight was 216 and on 10/01/23 a weight of 229 pounds. This was a 5.68% weight gain over that time period. 2. Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed admission date of 12/13/23. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified under section K significant weight loss. Resident #68's weight records identified an admission weight of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, facility failed to ensure pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) were completed accurately and corrected as needed. This affected two (#7 and #13) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. Facility census was 65. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 09/30/21. Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, diabetes, depression, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact with a BIMS of 15 and required assistance for ambulation and activities of daily living. Review of the PASARR dated 11/07/21 revealed only mood disorder was documented. 2. Review of the medical record for the Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 11/19/18. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes type two, heart failure, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update care plans regarding elopement and advanced directives. This affected one (#25) of 18 sampled residents care plans reviewed. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 12/13/23, with diagnoses including dementia with agitation, Alzheimer's disease, epileptic seizures, altered mental status, and major depressive disorder. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of zero which indicated severely cognitively impaired. No behaviors noted during the look back period. Review of Care Plan dated 02/02/24 revealed resident/family had chosen advanced directive of Full Code. Review of care plan revealed Resident #25 wanders aimlessly/elopement risk related to impaired safety awareness, dementia. Interventions include wander guard to right ankle, check placement per protocol. Review of physician orders for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided the necessary glasses to maintain vision. In addition, ensure a system was in place for staff to identify which resident requires assistive devices. This affected one (#8) of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/24/21, with medical diagnoses including: stroke, schizophrenia and major depression. Review of Resident #8's Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] and 01/20/24, under section B identified vision with no corrective lenses. The record identified no plans of care related to Resident #8's vision/glasses. Interview and observation on 02/12/24 at 7:41 A.M., revealed Resident #8 stated she has glasses but does not know where they are. Resident #8's room was observed with an empty glass case. Review of a vision consult note dated 07/18/23, identified Resident #8 was noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, policy reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was accurately assessed after an elopement attempted, ensure staff was informed to monitor resident after an elopement attempt, and a resident's fall interventions were implemented. This affected two (#15 and #46) of two residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. Facility census was 65. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #46 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, respiratory failure, and muscle weakness and cognitive communication deficit. Review of admission elopement assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident had no cognitive impairment or poor decision making skills, no diagnosis of dementia, did not ambulate independently, resident without desire to go home, no history of elopement or exit seeking behavior, resident did not wander aimlessly, and resident was not wandering or exit seeking to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record reviews, dietary meal cards review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a physician ordered fluids restriction was being provided as ordered. This affected one (#40) of one resident identified with fluid restriction. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed admission date on 12/21/23, with medical diagnoses including pneumonia, end stage renal disease, fractured 5th lumbar vertebra, major depression and hyperkalemia. Review of physician orders dated 12/27/23, identified a fluid restriction for the resident that included: fluid restriction of 1500 ml (milliliter) daily divided 540 ml for nursing and 960 ml for dietary and no water pitcher at the bedside. Review of Resident #40's nutritional assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was a new resident at the facility. The assessment identified Resident #40 was on a 1500 ml fluid restriction and is able to feed himself. The notes identified Dietician #264…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review, fire department run sheet review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to document accurate pertinent changes that occurred in Resident #69 condition. This affected one (#69) of 18 sampled residents. The facility census is 65. Findings include: Review of Resident #69's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE], with a diagnoses of cellulitis of left limb, unspecified convulsions, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, and is a full code. Review of the most recent admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 was cognitively intact and requires a staff assist of one person for activities of daily living. Review of progress note dated [DATE] (no time) revealed Resident #69 was found in the restroom sitting on the toilet fully clothed. Resident #69 began jerking, yet his arms and legs were limp. Vital signs were taken. Resident #69 went limp in Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #266's arms, and Resident #69's head fell forward.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — patternNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on employee personnel records, background check log, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure reference checks were completed for four new employees. This affected four (Registered Nurse [RN] #229, Social Worker/Administrative Assistant [SW/AA] #869, Medication Technician [MT] #388, and Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] #443) of the four personnel files reviewed but had the potential to affect all 74 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of employee file for RN #229, revealed no documented evidence of reference checks being completed. Review of employee file for SW/AA #869, revealed no documented evidence of reference checks being completed. Review of employee file for MT #388, revealed no documented evidence of reference checks being completed. Review of employee file for CNA #443, revealed no documented evidence of reference checks being completed. Interview with Human Resource Director (HRD) #900 on 12/19/24 at 2:17 P.M. verified there were no reference checks for RN #229, SW/AA #869, MT #388, and CNA #443.
- No harm found · C2024-02-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespreadRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, self reported incident review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough investigation was completed into an allegation of physical abuse alleged. In addition the facility failed ot provide protection for residents agianst the alleged abuser. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents in the facility. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of Resident #176's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/09/23 and a discharge date of 12/12/23. Diagnoses included myoneural disorder, major depressive disorder, and dysphagia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #176 was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent on activities of daily living (ADL). Review of facility self-reported incident (SRI) tracking number 241433 filed on 11/22/23 revealed Resident #176 alleged that a male staff member pushed his face into a pillow. Resident #176 reported the allegation to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-02-15 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the correct posted staffing was completed daily. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Observation of the facility occurred on 02/12/24 at 6:08 P.M., upon entering to start the annual inspection, the posted staffing was observed to be in a plastic frame sitting on the nursing station. The posted staffing was dated 01/31/24. Interview on 02/13/24 at 10:32 A.M., with the Administrator confirmed the posted staffing was dated 01/31/24 on 02/12/24. The interview identified the Central Supply/ Scheduler #201 is responsible for posted daily staffing. Interview on 02/13/24 at 10:35 A.M., with Central Supply/ Scheduler #201 identified she completes the forms for the posted staffing and leaves them in a folder for the night shift nurses to post. The interview confirmed she was not checking if night shift was posting the staffing and confirmed apparently they are not. The interview confirmed the facility is utilizing agency staffing for nursing quite a bit on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/01/2024 |
| PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2024 |
| KELLOGG, SHANNON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| 1170 WEST MANFIELD STREET OH OWNER LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| SNF OH HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WELL INTEGRA MASTER JV LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WELL PM HOLDCO JV LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| STORMONT, MICHAEL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $252K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365619. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.