No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Chillicothe Post Acute

1058 Columbus St, Chillicothe, OH 45601 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (740) 773-5000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 773-5000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0606) — cited May 2022Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited May 2022
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
311 Caldwell St · (740) 775-6119 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
215 Old Eastern Ave · (740) 772-5180 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
633 Charleston Pike · (740) 775-5296 · Call to confirm hours
Park
914 Toledo St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.4%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight13.4%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms82.5%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.0%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.8%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.7%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.2%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.5%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine59.0%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.8%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.1%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.511.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.571.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
87.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.49U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 87.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.3%CMS range 41.1–60.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 8.0–16.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge87.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge83.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge70.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 3.8–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.81
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.83
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
34.7%
Total nursing turnover
31.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 82.2 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-10)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the floors in resident bathrooms were in good repair. This affected 19 (Residents #10, #11, #20, #23, #31, #32, #35, #37, #52, #57, #61, #65, #66, #68, #76, #79, #87, #89, and #93) residents. The facility census was 80.Findings include:Observation of the facility on 03/05/2026 at 10:22 A.M. revealed that the resident bathroom floors for Residents #10, #11, #20, #23, #31, #32, #35, #37, #52, #57, #61, #65, #66, #68, #76, #79, #87, #89, and #93 were torn, cracked, warped and/or peeling away from the walls.Interview with Resident #52 on 03/052026 at 10:32 A.M. revealed that the bathroom floor is in need of replacement and the staff is aware.Interview with Maintenance Assistant #345 on 03/05/2026 at 10:35 A.M. revealed that some bathroom floors in resident rooms are in disrepair therefore the facility has obtained quotes as they need replaced.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature and acceptable palatability. This had the potential to affect 78 residents who received meals in the facility. The facility identified Residents #87 and #93 as not receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 80.Findings include:An interview conducted on 03/02/26 at 9:43 A.M. with Resident #31 revealed that meals are hardly ever hot.An interview conducted on 03/02/2026 at 9:51 A.M. with Resident #61 revealed that the food is not good and comes out cold.An interview conducted on 03/03/26 at 7:58 A.M. with Resident #73 revealed the food is alright, but they often get things that they do not like or cannot eat such as corn and bread. Resident #73 stated that dietary is aware of their preferences and has been reminded. Observation of meal trays being passed on 03/05/2026 at 8:20 A.M. revealed Resident #69 with complaints that the French Toast could not be cut or chewed. Substitute requested.Test tray sampling on 03/05/2026 at 8:43 A.M. revealed milk temperature of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to properly store food. This had the potential to affect 78 residents who received meals in the facility. The facility identified Residents #87 and #93 as not receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 80.Findings include:Observation of the kitchen during the initial tour on 03/02/2026 at 8:30 A.M. revealed opened packages of hotdogs, pepperonis, and a container half full of sliced cheese with no dates. The freezer further revealed an opened bag of chicken strips with no date.Interview with Dietary Manager (DM) #448 on 03/02/2026 at 8:35 A.M. during the initial kitchen tour confirmed the observations of no dates on opened packages of hot dogs, pepperonis, sliced cheese and chicken strips.Review of the Food Receiving and Storage Policy N.D. on 03/03/2026 revealed that all foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer are to be covered, labeled and dated ( use-by date). Refrigerated foods are labeled, dated, and monitored so they are used by their use-by date, frozen, or discarded.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interview, review of facility infection surveillance logs, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents with in-house acquired Clostridium Difficile (C-Diff) infections were reviewed for patterns and trends to decrease the spread of infection. This affected seven residents (#36, #42, #52, #71, #103, #104, and #228) identified by the facility as having acquiring C-Diff infections in the facility since 11/01/2025. The facility census was 80.Findings include:Record review for Resident #22 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review for Resident #36 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Record review for Resident #42 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE],Record review for Resident #52 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Record review for Resident #71 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Record review for Resident #103 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were ordered for appropriate diagnoses. This affected one resident (#7) out of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 80 at the time of survey. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included radiculopathy, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atherosclerosis of coronary artery bypass graft, and bipolar disorder with current episode hypomanic. Review of most recent psychiatric services documentation dated 02/04/2026 revealed Resident #7 had mental health diagnoses of bipolar disorder, anxiety, and insomnia.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander.Review of medication orders for Resident #7 revealed orders as follows:Citalopram Hydrobromide tablet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address elopement risk. This affected one resident (Resident #61) of one resident reviewed for care plan accuracy. The facility identified five residents at risk for elopement. The facility census was 80.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 03/20/25 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting his right, non-dominant side, aphasia following cerebral infarction, depression, and high blood pressure. Further record review revealed on admission, his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 10 out of 15, indicating he had moderate cognitive impairment.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment completed on 02/09/26 revealed Resident #61 was independently mobile with the use of a manual wheelchair. He required maximal assistance with toileting, showering, dressing, and positioning. Resident #61 had displayed no verbal or physical disruptive behaviors, no rejection of care, and no wandering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to monitor resident's blood sugars. This had the potential to affect one (Resident #99) of 15 residents the facility identified as diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). The facility census was 80 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical records for Resident #99 revealed admission date of 02/23/26 with diagnoses of urinary tract infect ion, Parkinsonism and T2DM with hyperglycemia, T2DM with other specified complications, and T2DM with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified. Review of the Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed an order for TRUEplus Lancets 33G. Review of the 02/24/26 facility nurse practioner's progress note dated 02/24/26 and 02/26/26 revealed to continue blood glucose monitoring per facility protocol. Review of the 02/27/26 progress note by the facility medical director revealed there is currently no need for change to the current care. Nursing has orders and they are assisting in the stability of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure wound care orders for the treatment of pressure ulcers were implemented timely and appropriately. This affected one resident (#93) out of the three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 80.Findings include:Record review for Resident #93 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included stage three pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin loss, in which fat tissue is visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and rolled wound edges is often present) of the sacral region, cellulitis, and aphasia following cerebral infarction.Review of the care plan, dated 02/26/26, revealed the resident had impaired skin integrity present on admission as evidenced by a stage four pressure ulcer (a pressure ulcer in which there is full-thickness tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, mucle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone in the ulcer)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #61) was free of elopements. This affected one resident (#61) of four residents reviewed for elopements. The facility census was 80.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 03/20/25 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting his right, non-dominant side, aphasia following cerebral infarction, depression, and high blood pressure. Further record review revealed on admission, his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 10 out of 15, indicating he had moderate cognitive impairment.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment completed on 02/09/26 revealed Resident #61 was independently mobile with the use of a manual wheelchair. He required maximal assistance with toileting, showering, dressing, and positioning. Resident #61 had displayed no verbal or physical disruptive behaviors, no rejection of care, and no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure tube feedings were administered at the rate ordered by the physician. This affected two residents (#87 and #93) out of the three residents reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 80.Findings include:1. Record review for Resident #87 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, type two diabetes mellitus, and dysphagia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/25/26, revealed the resident was assessed to have mildly impaired cognition. Review of the care plan, dated 02/19/26, revealed the resident was at risk for malnutrition due to gastrostomy tube, requires enteral nutrition. Interventions included to administer enteral nutrition as ordered. Review of the active physician order, dated 02/25/26, revealed the resident was to receive Diabetisource AC by PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure orders were in place for oxygen administration. This affected one resident (#6) out of three reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility census was 80 at the time of survey. Findings Include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, and hepatic encephalopathy.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was mildly cognitively impaired with a BIMS of 08 out of 15, had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander.Observation of Resident #6 on 03/02/2026 at 10:18 A.M. revealed an oxygen concentrator to be running next to Resident #6's bed. Resident #6's oxygen tubing was being changed.Review of Resident #6's physician orders revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record reviews, review of hospital discharge orders, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not administered longer than prescribed by the physician. This affected one resident (#103) out of the nine residents reviewed for Clostridium difficile (C-Diff) infections. The facility census was 80.Findings include: Closed record review for Resident #103 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included cellulitis of the right lower limb, anemia, and atrial fibrillation. The resident was discharged from the facility on 01/22/26. Review of the hospital discharge orders, dated 10/30/25, revealed the resident was ordered to receive 100 milligrams (mg) of Doxycycline (an antibiotic medication) twice a day for 9 days.Review of the facility physician order, dated 10/30/25, revealed the resident was ordered to receive 100 mg of Doxycycline twice a day. The order did not contain a stop date.Review of the Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that medications were not left unattended at a resident's bedside. This affected one resident (Resident #31) of 19 residents observed during initial observations. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 10/07/25. She had diagnoses including congestive heart failure, type II diabetes, and hypertension.Review of the Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment completed on 10/14/25 revealed Resident #31 was cognitively intact.Observation on 03/02/26 at 10:27 A.M. revealed a small cup with multiple medications on Resident #31's bedside table.Interview on 03/02/26 at 10:27 A.M. with Resident #31 confirmed her medications were left on her bedside. Resident #31 confirmed her nurse will usually leave her pills for her in the morning if she is too tired to take her medications.Review of physician's orders revealed Resident #61 was administered the following medications in the 9:00 A.M. medication administration timeframe:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to honor resident meal preferences. This had the potential to affect one (Resident #99) of 78 residents at the facility that receives meals from the kitchen. The facility identified Residents #87 and #93 as not receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 80 residents.Observation on 03/03/26 at 12:15 P.M. revealed Resident #99 received lunch meal which included beef tips and mashed potatoes with gravy. Review of Resident #99's meal ticket lists dislikes that included broccoli-cauliflower, asparagus, pork and gravy. Interview on 03/02/26 at 12:15 P.M. revealed Resident #99 waved down surveyor and stated, why give facility list of likes and dislikes if facility is not going to honor preferences. Interview on 03/02/26 Staff #327 confirmed resident beef tips and mashed potatoes were covered in gravy and meal ticket list gravy as a dislike.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate medical record. This affected one resident (Resident #61) of 24 residents reviewed for accuracy of medical records. The facility census was 80.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 03/20/25 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting his right, non-dominant side, aphasia following cerebral infarction, depression, and high blood pressure. Further record review revealed on admission, his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 10 out of 15, indicating he had moderate cognitive impairment.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment completed on 02/09/26 revealed Resident #61 was independently mobile with the use of a manual wheelchair. He required maximal assistance with toileting, showering, dressing, and positioning. Resident #61 had displayed no verbal or physical disruptive behaviors, no rejection of care, and no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was immediately notified of a resident's change of condition. This affected one (#120) of three residents reviewed for change of condition. The facility census was 70.Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #120 revealed an admission date of 07/17/25 and was discharged on 07/19/25. Diagnoses included coronary artery disease, hydronephrosis, renal insufficiency, anxiety, depression, atrial fibrillation, and cardiomyopathy. Review of the five-day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #120 was moderately cognitively impaired, and was partial to moderate assistance for toileting, bed mobility, and for transfers. Review of the progress note dated 07/19/25 at 12:19 A.M. revealed Resident #120 was yelling and the staff entered the room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure bathroom flooring and resident room doors were maintained in a clean and safe condition. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure linens were changed upon being soiled in a timely manner. This affected eight (#20, #23, #35, #75, #235, #236, and #238) of eight residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Observation on 07/15/24 at 9:40 A.M. revealed the linoleum in the bathroom of Resident #235 and Resident #236 was taped down across the doorway with duct tape, which was dirty and tattered. There was a gap between the edge of the linoleum and the walls which went around the bathroom. Dirt and debris were observed in the gap between the linoleum and walls. 2. Observation on 07/15/24 at 9:50 A.M. revealed the linoleum in the bathroom of Resident #238 and Resident #75 was taped down across the doorway with duct tape which was dirty, tattered, and had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a manner to prevent food-borne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility, with the exception of two residents (#48 and #237) identified by the facility as having no food by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 87. Findings include: Observation on 07/15/24 at 9:00 A.M. revealed two large, uncooked pork loins in plastic packaging, lying in the sink. The two raw pork loins were submerged in water with the drain plug in place, keeping the water from draining. No water was running into the sink. Dietary Manager (DM) #500 obtained the temperature of the water the pork loins were submerged in with a facility thermometer. The water temperature was 62 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Interview with DM #500 on 07/15/24 at 9:02 A.M. confirmed the two raw pork loins were submerged in standing water, which had a temperature of 62 degrees F. DM #500 confirmed raw meats were only to be thawed under cold running water. Review of the facility policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident dignity was maintained during dining experiences. This affected two (#36 and #242) of two residents observed for dining. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Observation on 07/15/24 at 11:59 A.M. revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #54 entered the room of Resident #41, carrying the resident's lunch meal tray. STNA #54 set up the resident's tray and began to feed the resident while standing at the side of the resident's bed. Resident #242, Resident #41's roommate, was sitting in his wheelchair in the room and had not received a lunch meal tray. Interview on 07/15/24 at 12:08 P.M. with Resident #242 confirmed the lunch meal Resident #41 was being fed smelled good. Resident #242 additionally confirmed he was hungry and was still waiting for his lunch meal to be delivered to the room Interview on 07/15/24 at 12:10 P.M. with STNA #54 confirmed residents who required assistance consuming meals received their meal trays first so staff could assist them. While…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were invited to care conferences. This affected one (#23) of one residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 10/04/19. Diagnoses included diabetes, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebral ischemic attack, restlessness and agitation and impulsive behavior. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact. Review of the care conferences dated 12/16/23, 03/08/24 and 05/20/24 revealed no evidence Resident #23 was invited to or attended the care conferences. Interview on 07/16/24 at 9:24 A.M. with Resident #23 revealed she was unaware of any care conferences and had not been invited to any. Resident #23 stated she would have attended had she been invited.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate records and documentation were completed and sent with the resident upon transfer to the hospital. This affected one (#13) of the three residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Record review for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 10/25/23 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, pulmonary disease, and dementia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/23/24, revealed Resident #13 was assessed to have mildly impaired cognition. Review of the nurses progress note, dated 03/24/24 and timed 1:34 A.M., revealed Resident #13 experienced a change in condition and was transferred to the hospital. Further review of Resident #13's medical record revealed the facility SNF/NF to Hospital Transfer Form was not completed until 03/25/24, the day after the resident was sent to the hospital. Interview on 07/18/24 at 8:46 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the SNF/NF to Hospital Transfer Form,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded. This affected one (#82) of three residents reviewed for resident assessments. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of Resident #82's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/26/24 and discharged on 04/27/24. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, hypertensive heart disease, endocarditis, primary pulmonary hypertension, monothematic aortic valve stenosis, anemia, thrombocytopenia, hyperlipidemia, obesity, benign prostatic hyperplasia, hyperglycemia and anxiety disorder. Review of the Medicare Five-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/27/24, revealed Resident #82 discharged to a short term general hospital. Review of a progress note, dated 04/27/24 at 1:26 P.M., revealed Resident #82 was transferring to an inpatient hospice facility. Interview on 07/18/24 at 1:17 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #66 confirmed Resident #82 was transferred to an inpatient hospice facility and did not go to the hospital from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of the medical record, the facility failed to ensure a new skin impairment was assessed and monitored to promote healing. This affected one (#20) of four residents reviewed for skin assessments. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 06/15/21. Diagnoses included heart disease, anemia, muscle weakness, dysphasia and repeated falls. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 was cognitively intact. Observation on 07/15/24 at 12:08 P.M. of Resident #20 revealed the resident had a bandage to his left elbow. Concurrent interview with Resident #20 stated, during his shower, he bumped his elbow on the wall and had a small scrape. Resident #20 stated the nurse put a bandage on the area. Further review of Resident #20's medical record, including progress notes and skin/wound assessments, revealed no evidence of an assessment of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was appropriately assessed to identify the source of the resident's PTSD and minimize triggers and/or re-traumatization. This affected one (#48) of one residents identified by the facility as having a diagnosis of PTSD/trauma. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Record review for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 06/27/23. Diagnoses included PTSD, chronic respiratory failure, chronic osteomyelitis, diabetes mellitus type II, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular insufficiency, protein-calorie malnutrition, apraxia, hypotension, myocardial infarction, anxiety, pulmonary embolism, spinal stenosis, restless leg syndrome, epilepsy, chronic pain, pseudobulbar affect (causes uncontrollable crying and/or laughing), insomnia, gastroesophageal reflux disease and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/05/24, revealed Resident #48 was cognitively intact. Resident #48 had an active diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of pharmacy recommendations, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely act upon pharmacy recommendations for laboratory values to be drawn. This affected one (#25) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admission date of of 12/29/22. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, myocardial infarction, epilepsy, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, hypertension, chronic pain syndrome, , major depressive disorder, gastroesophageal reflux disease, fracture of right upper end of humerus and localized edema. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/18/24, revealed Resident #25 was cognitively intact, used a walker to aid in ambulation and was always continent of bowel and bladder. Review of a physician order dated 04/18/23 revealed to give Keppra (anti-seizure medication) oral tablet 500…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medication error rates were not greater than 5% when staff crushed extended release medications for Residents #27 and #46. This affected two (#27 and #46) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility had two errors out of 30 opportunities, for a medication error rate of 6.67%. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/18/22. Diagnoses included carotid artery syndrome, heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus, atherosclerotic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, anemia and vascular dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/19/24, revealed Resident #27 was severely cognitively impaired, used a wheelchair, had an ostomy and was always incontinent of bladder. Review of a physician order dated 04/20/22 revealed to give metoprolol succinate extended release tablet 24 Hour 50 milligram (mg), one tablet by mouth one time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of dental notes, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dental recommendations were followed-up on timely. This affected one (#23) of one residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 10/04/19. Diagnoses included diabetes, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebral ischemic attack, restlessness and agitation and impulsive behavior. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact. The dental section indicated Resident #23 had no broken teeth. Review of the plan of care dated 05/08/24 revealed Resident #23 was at risk for oral and dental problems. Interventions included to monitor, document and report any problems needing attention. Review of dental notes dated 09/27/23 revealed Resident #23 was seen by the dentist for discomfort.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure residents were timely offered, provided, and educated on pneumococcal vaccinations. This affected three (#23, #25, and #58) of five residents reviewed for vaccination status. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 10/04/19. Diagnoses included diabetes, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebral ischemic attack, restlessness and agitation and impulsive behavior. Review of the pneumococcal consent dated 09/15/23 revealed Resident #23 consented to the pneumonia vaccine. Further review revealed the vaccine was not administered until 10/02/23. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 12/29/22. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, cerebral infarct, diabetes and epilepsy. Further review of Resident #25's medical record revealed the resident's family declined the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents who received psychoactive medications identified specific target behaviors, reduced the medication when the reduction was not clinically contraindicated, and had not ruled out causes of newly emergent behaviors before administering psychoactive medications. This affected four residents (#04, #45, #46, and #55) of six sampled resident reviewed for unnecessary drugs. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #04's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary, schizophrenia, and fall. Review of Resident #04's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) date 04/18/2022 revealed the following. Resident # 04's speech was clear, he made himself understood, he usually understands others, and his cognition was intact. Resident #04 had no indicators of psychosis, no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Resident #04 required extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure the glucometer was cleaned effectively between use. This had the potential to affect 12 residents (#27, #49, #17, #32, #35, #53, #20, #28, #215, #07, #25 and #14) of 22 residents residing on the hallway who required blood glucose monitoring. The facility census was 75. Findings include: During an observation on 05/04/22 at 7:50 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #309 cleaned the glucometer, after use, with an alcohol wipe pad. LPN #309 wiped the glucometer off once over and placed it on top of the medication cart. During an interview on 05/04/22 at 7:51 A.M., with LPN # 309 verified the glucometer was cleaned with an alcohol wipe pad. LPN #309 said she always cleaned the glucometer with an alcohol wipe and was not aware of the facility policy on cleaning/sanitizing glucometers. LPN #309 proceeded to the supervisor for instruction. During an interview on 05/04/22 at 9:44 A.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed cleaning the glucometer with an alcohol wipe was not standard practice or proper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the [NAME] Nursing Drug book, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of the indication and side effects of medication to make an informed decision. This affected one resident (#12) of 20 residents reviewed. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 06/10/18 with diagnosis including peripheral vascular disease, depression, morbid obesity, weakness and chronic pain. Review of the Medicare five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact with behaviors of rejection of care. Resident #12 required extensive assistance of two persons for bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #12 was continent of bladder function and had a colostomy for bowel function. Review of the physician orders for May 2022 revealed on 11/19/20 Resident #12 was ordered and received Cimetidine (an antacid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to refer a resident with a newly evident mental disorder for a level II resident review with a significant change in status assessment. This affected one resident (#55)of six residents reviewed for pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR). The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included right lower leg fracture, hyperkalemia, paranoid personality, skin picking disorder, restless leg syndrome, depression, type II diabetes, and end stage renal disease. Review of Resident #55's PASRR dated 03/02/2022 revealed no mental illness diagnoses. Review of Resident #55's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #55 was not considered to have a serious mental illness. Resident #55's speech was clear, he made himself understood, he understands, and his cognition was intact. Review of Resident #55's progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents with diagnoses of mental disorders or intellectual disabilities were correctly identified during the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) and the facility failed to reassess residents with expired level one determinations. This affected two residents (#02 and #45) of seven residents reviewed during the annual survey for PASARR. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for resident #02 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included depressive disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbance, dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychosis not due to a substance or known disorder. Resident # 2 was diagnosed with cognitive communication deficit on [DATE]. Review of Resident #02's physician orders revealed an order for risperidone (antipsychotic medication) 0.5 milligrams one tablet by mouth once daily at bedtime for dementia with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure care planned skin alteration prevention interventions were in place and failed to ensure residents edema was being monitored. This affected two residents (#57 and #51) out of the five residents reviewed for edema and skin conditions. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #57 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including acute combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, cognitive communication deficit, polyneuropathy, recurrent depressive disorders, cerebral infarction, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, repeated falls, dysphagia, hemiplegia and hemiparalysis affecting unspecified site, and osteoarthritis. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident #57 had mildly impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 10. This resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident's bed was positioned to prevent the resident from falling out of bed between the bed and the wall. This affected one resident (#04) of three sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #04's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary, schizophrenia, and falls. Review of Resident #04's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following. Resident #04's speech was clear, he made himself understood, he usually understands others, and his cognition was intact. Resident #04 had no indicators of psychosis, no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Resident #04 required extensive assistance two staff for bed mobility, to transfer, and did not walk. Resident #04 had two or more falls with no injury and two or more falls with minor injury. Review of Resident #04's behavior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of medical record for resident #02 revealed an admission date of 11/25/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, other recurrent depressive disorders, atrial fibrillation, dementia, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, dysphagia, and anemia. Review of Resident #02's weights revealed on 04/07/2022 the resident weighed 158.2 pounds. On 04/27/2022, the resident weighed 149.0 pounds which is a -5.82 % loss. And further review of Resident #02's weights revealed on 01/07/2022 the resident weighed 177.0 lbs. On 04/27/2022, the resident weighed 149 pounds which is a -15.82 % loss. Review of Resident #02's orders revealed an order for ProMod Liquid 30 milliliters by mouth two times daily for wound healing and an order for Dronabinol 2.5 milligrams by two times daily for poor appetite. Review of Resident #02's care plan revealed interventions to administer appetite stimulant as ordered and an intervention to encourage and assist as needed to consume…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to evaluate a resident's need for an opioid analgesic prior to the administration of the medication. This affected one resident (#265) of one resident's reviewed for pain. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #265's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis, alcohol use, type II diabetes, streptococcal infection, non-pressure chronic ulcer of foot with fat layer exposed, resistance to vancomycin, and altered mental status. Review of Resident #265's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed his speech was clear, he made himself understood, understands others, and his cognition was intact. Resident #265 had no behaviors and did not resist care. Resident #265 required supervision of one staff for bed mobility, to transfer, and to walk. Resident #265 received scheduled pain medication, received as needed (PRN) pain medication, and non-medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered without error. There were 38 opportunities for error with three observed errors for a calculated error rate of 7.89 percent. This affected one resident (#17) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 75. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 10/18/18. Diagnoses included glaucoma, macular degeneration and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #17 required assistance with medication administration. Review of the physician orders for May 2022 revealed Resident #17 was ordered Artificial Tears instill two drops to both eyes two times daily, Timolol Maleate (a medication to decrease pressure inside the eye) 0.5% instill one drop to both eyes two times daily, Brimonidine (a glaucoma medication) 0.2% instill one drop to both eyes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-05-09 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespread
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure prospective employees were cross checked on all registries prior to hire. This affected two employee personnel files of 11 personnel files reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of personnel records for the Administrator revealed a hire date of 01/04/21, and Human Resources Director # 166, hire date of 11/15/21, had no evidence they were checked against the State of Ohio Nurse Aide Registry. During an interview with Human Resources Director #166 on 05/05/22 at 2:49 P.M., verified the personnel files for the Administrator #146 and Human Resources Director #166 contained no evidence of pre-employment checks against the State of Ohio Nurse Aide Registry.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2024
PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2024
DIXON, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
1058 COLUMBUS STREET OH OWNER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
SNF OH HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WELL INTEGRA MASTER JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WELL PM HOLDCO JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WELLTOWER INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
STILTNER, SEANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$378K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 8%Other / private 35%

This home reported $378K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$318per resident / day
operating cost
$9,672per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$313per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365576. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next