No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Norwood Towers Post-Acute

1500 Sherman Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45212 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (513) 631-6800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (513) 631-6800 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0603) — most recent Feb 2026Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 actual-harm citation1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent Feb 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0570)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2049 Sherman Ave · (513) 824-2886 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2000 Joseph E Sanker Blvd · (513) 841-7508 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Metro0.5 mi
1801 Transpark Dr · (513) 531-6888 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1700 Mills Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.9%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.2%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms98.9%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.2%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.2%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.6%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.0%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.7%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%75.6%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.841.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.661.801.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.1–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.341.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.31
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.81
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.15
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
62.7%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 102.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.32 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-16)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-12-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, hospice staff interview, review of the hospice record, review of the controlled drug receipt/record/disposition form, review of the text message correspondence, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with chronic pain syndrome received as needed medication for breakthrough pain. This resulted in Actual Harm, when staff failed to ensure Resident #08 received as needed (PRN) pain medication when she reported severe pain. This affected one (#08) of three residents reviewed for pain. The census was 110. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #08 revealed an admission date of 12/14/24. Diagnoses included chronic pain syndrome, malignant neoplasm of the larynx, anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, osteomyelitis of the back, fibromyalgia, and bowel rupture with colostomy. Resident #08 was diagnosed on [DATE] with cT3NO (a cancer tumor that has spread into the outermost layer but has not spread to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #44) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 101 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 11/24/15 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, type two diabetes, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #44 dated 02/10/26 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of a progress note for Resident #44 dated 02/18/26 per Nurse Practitioner (NP) #368 revealed she was notified that nursing staff had administered the wrong medications to the resident on 02/17/26. Resident #44…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to accommodate the residents who wanted showers versus bed baths. This affected one (Resident #40) of three residents reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 108. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 08/26/25. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and mood disorder.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine. This resident was assessed to require substantial assistance with toileting and dressing, bathing and transfers.Review of the documented showers for January and February 2026 for Resident #40 revealed the following:a) On 01/05/26, no shower was given. b) On 01/06/26, a bed bath was given.c) On 01/08/26, not applicable was documented.d) On 01/12/26, a bed bath was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure physicians/providers were notified of a significant change in resident status and failed to notify the physicians/providers when a resident was moved to the secured Memory Care Unit. This affected one (Resident #47) of three residents reviewed for significant changes. The facility census was 108. Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 01/13/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type I diabetes mellitus (DM I), and paranoid schizophrenia.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11. This resident was assessed to require supervision with eating, toileting, dressing, and transfers, and setup with bathing.Review of the progress note dated 01/24/26 at 6:45 P.M. revealed Resident #47 was lying in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse. This affected two Residents (#65 and #111) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 108. 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #111 revealed an admission date of 10/10/25 with a discharge date of 02/03/26. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of brain, hypertension, and metabolic encephalopathy.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #111 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero. Review of the progress note dated 12/30/25 at 8:00 A.M. revealed Resident #111 had facial trauma per the staff from a physical disturbance between him and Resident #65, and then they were separated immediately. Resident #111 was assessed with redness on his face and nose, and small hematoma on the right side of his head. Resident #111 was nonverbal but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from involuntary seclusion. This affected one (Resident #47) of three resident reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 108.Review of the medical record for Resident#47 revealed an admission date of 01/13/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type I diabetes mellitus (DM I), and paranoid schizophrenia.Review of the smoking observation assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was an independent smoker with no cognitive impairment.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11. This resident was assessed to require supervision with eating, toileting, dressing, and transfers, and setup with bathing. Review of the progress note dated 01/24/26 at 6:45 P.M. revealed Resident #47 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy when an allegation of abuse was reported. This affected two Residents (#65 and #111) of the four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 108 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #111 revealed an admission date of 10/10/25 with a discharge date of 02/03/26. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of brain, hypertension, and metabolic encephalopathy.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #111 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero. This resident was assessed to require partial assistance with eating, dependent on toileting, bathing, and dressing, and setup for transfers.Review of the progress note dated 12/30/25 at 8:00 A.M. revealed Resident #111 had facial trauma per the staff from a physical disturbance between him and Resident #65, and then they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to report alleged abuse to the state agency. This affected two Residents (#65 and #111) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 108. 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #111 revealed an admission date of 10/10/25 with a discharge date of 02/03/26. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of brain, hypertension, and metabolic encephalopathy.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #111 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero. This resident was assessed to require partial assistance with eating, dependent on toileting, bathing, and dressing, and setup for transfers.Review of the progress note dated 12/30/25 at 8:00 A.M. revealed Resident #111 had facial trauma per the staff from a physical disturbance between him and Resident #65, and then they were separated immediately. Resident #111…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate alleged abuse. This affected two (#65 and #111) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 108. 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #111 revealed an admission date of 10/10/25 with a discharge date of 02/03/26. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of brain, hypertension, and metabolic encephalopathy.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #111 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero. This resident was assessed to require partial assistance with eating, dependent on toileting, bathing, and dressing, and setup for transfers.Review of the progress note dated 12/30/25 at 8:00 A.M. revealed Resident #111 had facial trauma per the staff from a physical disturbance between him and Resident #65, and then they were separated immediately. Resident #111 was assessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, observation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide information on the grievance process and how to file a grievance. This affected three (Residents #37, #66 and #106) of three residents reviewed on how to file a grievance and had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 111. Based on record review, staff and resident interview, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to provide information on the grievance process and how to file a grievance. This affected three (Residents #37, #66 and #106) of three residents reviewed on how to file a grievance. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 111. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record and quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #37 revealed he was admitted to facility on 07/17/25 and revealed resident to be cognitively intact. Resident #37 currently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff and resident interviews, observations, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were made aware of what they were going to be served for meals. This had the potential to affect 108 of the 111 residents in the facility who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified three residents (#9, #17 and #89) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 111. Based on review of the medical record, staff and resident interviews, observations, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were made aware of what they were going to be served for meals. This affected three (#28, #93, and #117) out of five residents reviewed for food and nutrition. This had the potential to affect 108 out of the 111 residents in the facility who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified three residents (#9, #17 and #89) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 111. Findings included:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a manner to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect 108 out of 111 residents in the facility who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified three residents (#9, #17 and #89) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 111. Findings include: Initial tour of kitchen on 12/01/25 at 8:30 A.M. with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #272 revealed several issues with food storage in the dry storage area, the walk-in refrigerator, the walk-in freezer as well as the first floor, the second floor, and the third floor kitchenette refrigerators. Observation on 12/01/25 at 8:43 A.M. of dry storage area with DS #272 revealed a bag of undated and open to air flour tortillas and undated pasta. DS #272 confirmed the open to air and undated tortillas and the undated pasta. Observation on 12/01/25 at 9:02 A.M. of the walk-in refrigerator with DS #272 revealed three individual serving sized yogurts with expiration dates of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment. This affected seven (#114, #47, #25, #50, #17, #71, and #73) out of seven residents reviewed for the environment. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the elevator was clean and had appropriate lighting. This had the potential to affect any resident who used the elevator. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the memory care unit (MCU) was free from odors. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided in rooms 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, and 259. The facility census was 111.Findings included:Observation of Resident #17's room on 12/01/25 at 11:12 A.M. revealed his tube feeding pole had a dried brownish substance running down the pole. His blind on the window was broken. The privacy curtain that was in the room had brown spots on it. Interview with the certified nursing assistant (CNA) #279 on 12/01/25 at 11:19 A.M. confirmed the tube feeding pole was dirty and had not been cleaned in some time. She confirmed the blind was broken and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff and resident interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide privacy and dignity for three (Residents #39, #94, and #100) out of seven residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 111. Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide privacy and dignity for three (Residents #39, #94, and #100) out of seven residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 111. Findings Included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of asthma, anorexia, major depressive disorder, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #39 had moderate cognitive impairment and required setup and clean-up assistance for meals, partial to moderate assistance for bathing, and was dependent for toileting, personal hygiene, dressing upper and lower body, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician, registered dietician, and resident's representative when Resident #24 had a change of condition. This affected one resident (#24) out of three residents reviewed for change of condition. The facility census was 111.Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician, the registered dietician, and the resident's representative when Resident #24 had a change of condition. This affected one resident (#24) out of three residents reviewed for change of condition. The facility census was 111.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease with late onset, aphasia and protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 had severe cognitive impairment and was frequently incontinent of bowel and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, Minimum Data Set (MDS) review, staff interview, review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) was completed when a resident received a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder and when a resident had a severe weight loss. This affected two (Residents #3 and #24) of three residents reviewed for a significant change in condition. The facility census he was 111.Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) was completed when a resident received a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder and when a resident had a severe weight loss. This affected two (Residents #3 and #24) of three residents reviewed for a significant change in condition. The facility census he was 111. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorders were referred for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment. This affected one (Resident #3) of four residents reviewed for pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR). The facility census was 111.Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorders were referred for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment. This affected one (Resident #3) of four residents reviewed for pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR). The facility census was 111.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Guillain Barre Syndrome, abnormalities of gait and mobility, long term drug therapy, obesity, asthma, malnutrition, respiratory failure, pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to make notification to the state mental health agency for a significant change in mental health diagnosis for one (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for notification of change process. The facility census was 111.Based on medical record review, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to make notification to the state mental health agency for a significant change in mental health diagnosis for one (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for notification of change process. The facility census was 111.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Guillain Barre Syndrome, abnormalities of gait and mobility, long term drug therapy, obesity, asthma, malnutrition, respiratory failure, pulmonary edema, spinal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with necessary assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). This affected three (Residents #17, #73 and #76) of five residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility census was 111. Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with necessary assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). This affected three (Residents #17, #73 and #76) of five residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility census was 111. Findings included: 1.Medical record review for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 08/13/24. Medical diagnoses included diabetes, cerebrovascular attack, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, and gastrostomy. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was severely cognitively impaired. Functional status revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were safely smoking on the facility property. This affected two (#47 and #103) of two residents reviewed for smoking. The facility identified there were fifteen residents who required assistance with smoking. The facility census was 111. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #103 who revealed an admission date 08/09/22. Diagnoses included mood affective disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and prediabetes. Review of the smoking observation and assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #103 had smoking device use was cigarettes, was cognitive impaired, and had visual impairment. Resident #103 had dexterity impairments. Resident #103 can light his own smoking device. Smoking adaptive equipment needed was smoking apron. Level of assistance during smoking revealed supervision was required. Review of the plan of care dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medications were properly stored. This affected one (Resident #100) of 37 residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 111.Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 had intact cognition. The medical record, including physician orders, assessments, and plan of care, revealed Resident #100 had not been assessed or approved for self-administration of medications. Observation and interview on 12/02/25 at 9:42 A.M. with Resident #100 revealed a plastic cup containing various colored medications sitting in front of Resident #100 on the overbed table along with a cup of water. There was no labeling on the cup with the various colored medications. Resident #100 revealed he often consumed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for three (#22, #39, and #84) out of 25 residents reviewed. The facility census was 111. Findings Included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, seizures, epilepsy, hemiplegia, and dementia. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #22 had severe cognitive impairment and required setup or clean-up assistance for eating, oral care, bathing, dressing upper body, dressing lower body, putting on and off feet, and personal hygiene. Review of the plan of care for Resident #22 dated 10/20/25 revealed Resident #22 was at risk for activity of daily living self-care performance deficit and required staff supervision for ambulation, assist one person for morning and evening care, encouraged to participate in care to promote independent,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, medical record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside in a secured memory care unit. This affected one (Resident #9) of two residents reviewed for accidents. The facility identified 27 residents (#6, #10, #12, #13, #17, #20, #21, #23, #26, #30, #33, #37, #40, #44, #45, #52, #58, #66, #67, #72, #73, #81, #92, #93, #97, #99, and #100) who were cognitively impaired and independently mobile on the secured unit. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 05/30/23. Diagnoses included convulsions, schizoaffective disorder, mood disorder, vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, personal history of traumatic brain injury, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 was cognitively intact. Resident #9 required supervision/touching assistance for activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a proper and safe manner. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except the 40 residents residing on the secure unit. The facility census was 110. Findings include: 1. Observation of the medication storage room on the third floor of the facility on 06/26/24 at 2:46 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #526 revealed the door was unlocked and accessible to anyone. The medication storage room had the following expired medications: two bottles of aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) with expiration date of 01/2024, a bottle of Senna plus with expiration date of 06/2024, but written in black ink on the bottle was 04/06/23. The inner seal had been removed. A bottle of stool softeners with expiration date of 08/2023. The room designated as the nurse's station on the third floor was unable to be locked. LPN #526 retrieved a grey plastic bag of medications from under the desk. The bag held numerous daily medication packs for the residents on the third floor for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on staff for personal hygiene received adequate nail care. This affected one (Resident #78) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 05/30/23. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, type II diabetes mellitus, anxiety, schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #78 had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Resident #78 did not refuse care during the assessment period. Review of the care plan dated 06/01/23 revealed Resident #78 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to activity intolerance, disease process, fatigue, hemiplegia, impaired balance, and stroke.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely act on pharmacy recommendations. This affected two (Residents #16 and #32) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 110. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 07/06/23. Diagnosis included migraine. Review of the document titled Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber dated 02/19/24 revealed a recommendation to include the phrase a maximum daily dose of 30 milligrams (mg) per 24 hours be added to the order for Rizatriptan Benzoate 10 mg tablet for migraine and give 10 mg by mouth every two as needed for migraine. May repeat after original dose in two hours as needed. The option of agree was indicated and the document was signed on 02/23/24. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) and physician orders from 02/23/24 to 06/25/24 revealed the phrase a maximum daily dose of 30 milligrams (mg) per 24 hours had not been added to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-05-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure newly admitted residents were quarantined when indicated and proper precautions implemented, as well as not ensuring personal protective equipment (PPE) was readily available. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents were encouraged to remain socially distant during activities and smoking to prevent the potential spread of Covid-19. This had the potential to affect all 75 residents of the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #125 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included urinary tract infection, paranoid schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of immunization records for Resident #125 failed to reveal if the resident had received the Covid-19 vaccine. Review of Resident #125's physician's orders revealed no evidence the need to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Resident Council Meeting notes, resident interview, review of response forms, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide specific and appropriate resolution to resident concerns expressed during the meetings. The had the potential to affect 12 residents (#63, #41, #70, #54, #122, #30, #34, #60, #44, #23, #35 and #41) who attended the meetings in 2021. The facility census was 75 residents. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council meetings conducted in 2021 and response forms revealed: -On 01/20/21 resident #63 requested more activities. Residents #41 and #70 had concerns about the food quality and variety. There was no evidence of a response to address the resident's concerns. -On 2/18/21 resident #122 had complaints about her meals, wanted more activity crafts and did not like the way staff talked to her. Resident #34 had some missing clothing in the laundry and would like some different snacks. Resident #30 had clothing missing in the laundry. The response to this meeting revealed menu ideas were brainstormed and labeling ideas for clothing was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-27 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's surety bond, review of the resident personal fund trust account balance, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the amount of the resident funds surety bond was sufficient to assure the security of the amount of the resident's funds deposited with the facility. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents (#35, #59, #03, #17, #21, #45, #48, #53, #05, #54, #47, #04, #38, #32, #44, #46, #50, #06, #27, #63, #57, #40, #25, #60, #26, #58, #61, #10, #41, #09, #30, #19, #16, #62, #68, #28, #64, #07, #322, #18, #66, #55, #42, #67, #29, #69, #33, #11, #13, #20, #08, #71, #31, and #02) who had authorized the facility to manage their personal funds. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of Resident personal funds with Business Office Manager (BOM) #75 on 05/24/21 at 11:26 A.M. revealed there was a solitary trust account for both the residents of the nursing facility and the adjoining licensed residential care facility. The total amount of the resident funds being managed as of 05/18/21 was $241,214.57. Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide each resident with housekeeping and/or maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary and orderly environment to ensure protection of one resident's personal belongings from loss. This affected 12 residents (#7, #68, #59, #30, #27, #28, #67, #29, #47, #14, #71, and #32) of 12 residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. A tour of the first floor of the facility was conducted with Maintenance Director (MD) #08 on 05/19/21 at 11:13 A.M. While touring the first floor the following was observed: a) In the private room occupied by Resident #7 revealed a substantial accumulation of dust, dirt, paper and plastic debris on the floor behind and to the left and right of the head of the resident's bed. There were what appeared to be numerous dried on splashes of liquid debris on the walls to the left and right of the resident's television, and on the wall where the window was. The frame and padding of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-27 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interview, resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide bed hold notices for residents sent to the hospital. This affected five residents (#6, #7, #75, #122, and #322) of seven reviewed for bed hold notifications. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy, and anoxic brain damage. The record revealed Resident #6 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and 04/30/21. There was no evidence the resident or resident's representative was given a bed hold notice on either date of being transferred to the hospital. 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #322 was admitted to the facility originally on 12/01/17, with diagnoses including Covid-19, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), end stage renal disease, stage 5, and heart failure. Further review of Resident #322's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of Pharmacy Consultation Reports, and staff interview, the facility failed to act upon pharmacy recommendations for the gradual dose reduction (GDR) and discontinuation of anxiety medications. This affected three residents (#16, #32, and #42) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, altered mental status, dementia, anxiety, and and psychosis. Review of Resident #16's physician orders dated 07/08/20 revealed an order for Ativan 0.5 milligrams (mg) every 12 hours as needed, for severe agitation related to unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of repeated Pharmacy Consultation Report dated 07/15/20, 09/02/20, 11/27/20, 02/18/21, and 04/14/21, revealed to please discontinue as needed Ativan. If medication cannot be discontinued at this time, current regulations require that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure when a resident formulated an advanced directive it was accurately recorded in all locations of the medical record to ensure the resident's wishes would be followed as directed in the event of an emergency. This affected one resident (#68) of one reviewed for Advanced Directives. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia, diabetes mellitus type 1, anxiety disorder, anemia, neuropathy, and obesity. Review of Resident #68's five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #68's current physician orders in the electronic health record (EHR) revealed an order for the resident to be Full code. Review of the hard paper record for Resident #68 revealed no evidence of the designation of the resident's code status on the front of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive plan of care for each resident for assessed problems/needs relating to urinary incontinence, activities of daily living (ADLs), contractures, and the need to reside on a secured unit. This affected three residents (#68, #7, #29) of 31 reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia, diabetes mellitus type 1, anxiety disorder, anemia, neuropathy, and obesity. Review of Resident #68's admission incontinent assessment completed on 02/22/21 revealed the resident as being incontinence of urine at night time only, both urge and stress mixed incontinence, and that the resident had some incontinence and wore a pull up brief at night. Review Resident #68's care area assessment (CAA) dated 03/04/21 revealed the resident as being incontinent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services, including splinting, to improve and/or prevent further decline in range of motion (ROM). This affected one resident (#7) of one reviewed for ROM. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, intracranial injury, quadriplegia, spastic hemiplegia affecting left dominant side, contracture left hand, and muscle wasting. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 had moderately impaired cognitive skills. He was non verbal, however able to make his basic needs known via gestures/nodding. The resident was totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. He was assessed as having functional limitations in both his left and right upper and lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-27 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of the personnel files and staff interview, the facility failed to provide annual performance evaluations and 12 hours of inservice education for two State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) of four reviewed. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for STNA #3 who was hired on 01/20/16 and STNA #17 hired 12/18/13 revealed there was no evidence of an annual evaluation since 01/14/19. Additionally, the STNAs had no evidence of inservice training or education since 01/01/20. Interview with Administrator In Training (AIT) #200 on 05/24/21 at 4:45 P.M. verified STNA #3 and #17 had no evidence of an annual evaluation since 01/14/19. The AIT further verified there was no record STNAs completed inservice training to meet the 12 hour annual requirement since 01/01/20.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-27 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary behavioral health care and services to maintain their highest practicable mental and psychosocial well being. This affected one resident (#68) of one reviewed for behavioral health. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia, diabetes mellitus type 1, anxiety disorder, anemia, and neuropathy. The resident had resided in the adjoining Residential Care Facility (RCF) prior to being admitted to the facility. Review of an initial psychiatry visit for Resident #68 dated 11/24/20, while she was a resident of the RCF, revealed the psychiatrist who visited with the resident documented the resident had fixed non bizarre delusional beliefs concerning her marriage to a doctor who runs the facility. The psychiatrist diagnosed the resident with delusional disorder, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-01-08 for 53 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BANKS, UGOLAIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/09/2024
BULLOCK, ANDREWIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/26/2022
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
HANCOCK, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$336K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 30%Medicare 3%Other / private 67%

This home reported $336K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$290per resident / day
operating cost
$8,823per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$301per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366238. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next