Circleville Post-Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

28.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 88.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 89.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations resident and staff interviews and review of housekeeping records and review of the facility policy, facility failed to ensure Packaged Thermal Air Conditioner (PTAC) units were maintained in a clean manner. This affected two Residents (#39 and #40) but had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Observation of Resident #39 and #40's PTAC air machine on 05/12/26 at 9:44 A.M., revealed the vents where the air blew out had significant amount of debris including dust and dozens of coin size snack chips.Observation on 05/12/26 at 9:50 A.M. of the main dining areas, revealed three PTAC machines were present and all had thick pieces of dirt and dusty in the vent/grates where the air exited from toward the residents. During an interview on 05/12/26 at 11:51 A.M., Resident #40 stated the PTAC machine gets cleaned sometimes. Observation of Resident #39 and #40's PTAC air machines on 05/13/26 at 8:35 A.M. , revealed the vents where the air blew out had significant amount of debris including dust and dozens of coin size…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility to serve food at a palatable temperature. This affected all 90 residents in the facility. The facility census was 90. Findings include:Observation on 03/10/26 at 11:35 AM during lunch service revealed individually prepared fruit cups sitting on trays in the kitchen. Temperature of the fruit cups was checked by Dietary Manager #426 at 11:48 A.M. and found the temperature of the fruit cups to be 44 degrees Fahrenheit. Dietary Manager placed trays of fruit cups in the freezer.Interview with [NAME] #154 and [NAME] #248 confirmed they did not check the temperature of the fruit cups prior to lunch tray service and stated, we didn't know we had to.Review of the facility's food temperature logs for 02/23/25 through 03/20/26 revealed cold food items temperatures were checked on day of survey after being prompted and on 02/16/26.Observation on 03/10/26 at 12:56 P.M. during the test tray temperature check revealed fruit cup (peaches) temperature at 63 degrees Fahrenheit.Review of the facility's policy titled, Food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to store food in a safe manner, store kitchen utensils in a sanitary manner, prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner and maintain an ice machine in a safe and sanitary manner. This affected all 90 residents. The census was 90. Findings include:1.Observation on 03/09/26 at 6:48 AM on shelving near prep table in kitchen revealed a used 32-ounce bottle of kitchen bouquet browning and seasoning sauce (expiration 07/30/25) and 1 gallon of used white wine (expiration 04/14/25). Interview on 03/09/26 at 7:11 AM with [NAME] #154 confirmed expired items on shelving near prep table.Observation on 03/09/26 at 7:04 AM of the dry storage revealed open container of granulated sugar (lid off to the right side) open container of flour (lid off to the right side), 1 gallon of teriyaki marinade and sauce (unopened, expiration date 06/15/25), seven 32 ounce bottles of kitchen bouquet browning and seasoning sauce (unopened, expiration 07/2025), two bottles of 1 gallon red cooking wine (unopened, expiration 06/2025), two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-03-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel file review, staff interview, and facility policy review, this facility failed to provide a verbal abuse free environment for residents. This affected one resident (#75) of the one resident reviewed for abuse with the potential to affect all 71 residents who received care from Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #114. The facility census was 90. Findings include:Review of the employee personnel record for Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #114 revealed multiple corrective action forms including poor customer service, unprofessional behavior including being rude and negative towards residents and coworkers. Review of the Employee Counseling Form dated 09/30/2025 revealed CNA #114 failed to maintain respect for a resident. Review of the Employee Counseling Form dated 10/03/2025 revealed CNA #114 failed to maintain respect of a resident related to poor customer service. Review of a typed statement dated 01/14/2026 provided by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #236 revealed, On 01/13/2026, I had to verbally…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-03-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel file review, self-reported incident review, staff interview, and facility policy review, this facility failed to report verbal abuse to the required state agency. This affected one resident (#75) of the one resident reviewed for abuse with the potential to affect all 71 residents who received care from Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #114. The facility census was 90. Findings include:Review of the employee record for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #114 revealed multiple corrective action forms including poor customer service, unprofessional behavior including being rude and negative towards residents and coworkers. Review of the Employee Counseling Form dated 09/30/2025 revealed CNA #114 failed to maintain respect for residents. Review of the Employee Counseling Form dated 10/03/2025 revealed CNA #114 failed to maintain respect of residents related to poor customer service. Review of a typed statement dated 01/14/2026 provided by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #236 revealed, On 01/13/2026, I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-03-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel file review, self-reported incident review, staff interview, and facility policy review, this facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of verbal abuse. This affected one resident (#75) of the one resident reviewed for abuse with the potential to affect all 71 residents who received care from Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #114. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of the employee record for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #114 revealed multiple corrective action forms including poor customer service, unprofessional behavior including being rude and negative towards residents and coworkers. Review of the Employee Counseling Form dated 09/30/2025 revealed CNA #114 failed to maintain respect for residents. Review of the Employee Counseling Form dated 10/03/2025 revealed CNA #114 failed to maintain respect of residents related to poor customer service. Review of a typed statement dated 01/14/2026 provided by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #236 revealed, On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-16 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility record review the facility failed to prepare puree diet to the proper texture. This affected eight residents (#1, #3, #9, #24, #25, #44, #83, and #87) the facility identified as receiving a pureed diet. The census was 90. Findings include:Observation on 03/10/26 at 10:47 AM of lunch tray service revealed the chipped beef and country gravy puree was started. Further observation on 10:51 A.M. with [NAME] #154 revealed [NAME] #154 pouring pureed food into a metal container for service. [NAME] #154 did not taste the puree to check the texture, larger pieces of chipped beef were observed.Interview on 03/10/26 at 10:51 A.M. with [NAME] #154 revealed [NAME] #154 stated, I can go more but that's all the meat pieces will go down. [NAME] #154 did not taste puree to check the texture.Observation on 03/10/26 at 10:51 A.M. with Dietary Manager #426 advised [NAME] #154 to puree the chipped beef and gravy longer. Further observation at 10:56 A.M. revealed a smoother texture.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-03-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program that included ensuring appropriate antibiotic use. This affected four residents (#59, #68, #69, and #83) of five residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 90. Findings include: 1. Review of the record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 01/24/26 and diagnoses including dementia, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 01/31/26 documented a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 7, severe cognitive impairment. It indicated the resident was continent of urine and occasionally incontinent of bowel. Review of nursing progress notes dated 03/05/26 at 5:38 P.M. revealed the resident was agitated and tearful today. Obtained urine order. Review of a nursing progress note dated 03/11/26 at 2:26 P.M. revealed urine culture results this shift. Physician notified of results and continued altered mental status.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-03-16 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #69 was free from physical restraints. This affected one resident (#69) of one resident reviewed for physical restraints. The census was 90. Findings include:Review of Resident #69's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/14/25. Diagnoses included senile degeneration of brain, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity with agitation, cerebrovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, personal history of urinary tract infections, acquired absence of right leg above knee, essential (primary) hypertension, and bilateral hearing loss.Review of Resident # 69's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 00. Review of Resident #69's functional abilities revealed Resident #69 is dependent on care for toileting hygiene, rolling left to right, sit to lying, chair/bed-to-chair transfer and uses a manual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving psychotropic medication was being adequately monitored for response to treatment. This affected one resident (#3) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 90.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 01/02/26 and diagnoses including Parkinson's induced psychosis with a history of visual and auditory hallucinations, history of paranoia, and Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia (involuntary and uncontrollable body movements). He was admitted [DATE] with an order for an antipsychotic medication (Pimavanserin 34 milligrams daily) which is used to treat hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 01/09/26 documented a brief interview for mental status score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $290K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH