Beavercreek Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 84.5 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.05 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.69 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.13 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to properly and timely assess residents for change in condition. This resulted in Actual Harm for Resident #235 who had constipation with abdominal and rectal pain and had to be treated at the hospital for a fecal impaction. This affected one (Resident #235) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 95 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #235 revealed an admission date of 02/20/25 with diagnoses including wedge compression fracture of T7 and T8 vertebra with routine healing, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and fibromyalgia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #235 dated 02/26/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the physician's orders for Resident #235 revealed an order dated 02/21/25 for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of menus and spreadsheets, observation, staff interview, medical record review, resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure menu portion sizes were followed and menus were reviewed by a dietitian in advance. This affected all of the residents residing in the facility except for one (Resident #61) who received no food by mouth. The facility failed to ensure the resident got to make choices concerning breakfast. This affected three (Residents #22, #45, and #21) of three residents reviewed for choices during the annual survey. The facility census was 95 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the handwritten menu spreadsheet dated 03/11/25 revealed residents on regular and mechanical soft diets were to receive a number 12 or 2.66 ounce (oz) scoop of scrambled eggs with cheese, one slice of toast, and 6 oz of oatmeal, and residents on pureed diets were to receive a number 12 or 2.66 oz scoop of pureed scrambled eggs with cheese, a number 16 or 2 oz scoop of pureed bread, and a 6 oz scoop of cream of wheat. Observation of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen and food items were maintained in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. This affected all residents in the facility except for one resident (#61) that received no food by mouth. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Observation on 03/10/25 at 8:48 A.M of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) #215 revealed the following kitchen sanitation concerns: there was built up dirt behind the dishwasher, the garbage disposal had rust in the bowl of it, in the dishwasher room there were splashes of a substance running down the walls from the celling to the floor, there were rusty and dusty vents above the steam table area, the window in the kitchen had cobwebs, the wall behind the sink in the kitchen area had splashes of a substance running down the walls, there was an open rusted drain on the floor, the handwashing sink had a white substance running down the entire sink outside and inside, all of the kitchen walls had splashes of a substance on the walls from top to bottom. Interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, resident interview, review of staffing schedules, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate staffing to meet residents' needs. This affected one (Residents #61) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) and 10 (Residents #33, #28, #32, #59, #14, #52, #51, #31, #46, #186) of 27 residents sampled. The facility census was 95 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 02/10/25 with diagnoses including hip fracture, Alzheimer's disease, and cerebrovascular attack (CVA). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #61 dated 02/16/25 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Observation on 03/11/25 of Resident #61's room revealed the resident's call light was on from 3:38 P.M. to 4:02 P.M. while the resident yelled for the nurse. Further observation revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #33 entered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of dietary spreadsheets, observation, staff interview and review of facility recipes, the facility failed to ensure pureed eggs and pureed bread were prepared in a form to meet resident needs. This affected four (Residents #33, #42, #57, and #68) of four facility-identified resident who received pureed diets. The facility census was 95 residents. Findings include: Review of the dietary spreadsheet dated 03/11/25 revealed residents on pureed diets pureed scrambled eggs with cheese, pureed bread, and cream of wheat for breakfast. Observation in the kitchen on 03/11/25 at 7:25 A.M. of food to be served to residents on pureed diets revealed the pureed scrambled eggs had dime-sized chunks of eggs in them and the pureed bread had chunks of bread which were approximately one quarter inch in diameter. Interview on 03/11/25 at 8:00 A.M with Dietary Manager (DM) #215 confirmed the pureed scrambled eggs had chunks of egg which had not been blended and there were chunks of bread that were mixed in with the pureed bread. DM #215 confirmed that the pureed eggs and the pureed bread…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff responded to resident requests in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #61) of two residents reviewed for call lights. Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure the automatic door opener to the front door was functioning properly. This affected one (Resident #43) of 27 residents sampled. The facility census was 95 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 02/10/25 with diagnoses including hip fracture, Alzheimer's disease, and cerebrovascular attack (CVA). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #61 dated 02/16/25 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Observation on 03/11/25 of Resident #61's room revealed the resident's call light was on from 3:38 P.M. to 4:02 P.M. while…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify resident physicians of significant weight loss. This affected one (Resident #40) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 95 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 05/20/20 with diagnoses including coronary artery disease, heart failure, diabetes, dementia, and aphasia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #40 dated 11/26/24 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required set up assistance for eating. Review of the weight records for Resident #40 revealed the resident weighed 133 pounds (lbs.) on 02/06/25 and the resident weighed 123 lbs. on 03/12/25 which was a significant weight loss of 7.5 percent (%) in 33 days. Review of the progress notes for Resident #40 dated 03/12/25 to 03/17/25 revealed the notes did not include documentation of physician or provider notification of the resident's significant weight loss.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADL) care was provided for dependent residents. This affected two (Residents #43, #69) of six residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 95 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 03/29/23 with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, morbid obesity, vascular dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #43 dated 01/11/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had limited range of motion to one side of his bilateral upper and lower extremities and was dependent on staff assistance with toileting hygiene and transfers. Review of the care plan for Resident #43 dated 03/06/24 revealed the resident had a self-care deficit related to weakness and impaired mobility due to right sided hemiparesis and hemiplegia following cerebral vascular accident with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary medications. This affected one (Resident #43) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary drugs. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 03/29/23 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the weekly skin assessment for Resident #43 dated 12/11/24 revealed staff identified a fungal wound to the resident's scrotum on 12/04/25. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #43 revealed an order dated 12/14/24 revealed for Mupirocin ointment to the scrotum / tip of penis topically every shift for wound. Review of the wound progress note for Resident #43 dated 12/23/24 revealed there was a wound noted the central anterior scrotum with an order to apply Mupirocin ointment two times daily for seven days and then discontinue. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were not served food items to which they were allergic. This affected one (Resident #7) of 27 residents sampled. The facility census was 95 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 01/27/25 with diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia, and congestive heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #7 dated 02/04/25 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required set up assistance with eating. Review of the nutritional care plan for Resident #7 dated 02/05/25 revealed the resident was allergic to eggs. Interventions included staff should provide the diet per the physician order. Review of the nutritional assessment for Resident #7 dated 02/05/25 per Registered Dietitian (RD) #501 revealed the resident was ordered a mechanical soft…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as physician ordered. This affected two (#40 and #102) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 04/12/18 with diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, paraplegia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic autonomic (poly) neuropathy. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was cognitively intact. Resident #40 was independent with bed mobility, required set-up assistance with eating, oral hygiene, and personal hygiene. Resident #40 required supervision with bathing, dressing, transfers, and wheelchair mobility, and required substantial assistance with toileting hygiene. Review of Resident #40's physician orders revealed an order dated 02/23/24 for Pregabalin Capsule 300 MG,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$43,173 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $43,173 — penalty dated 2025-03-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $316K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH