No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Kettering Heights Post Acute

3313 Wilmington Pike, Kettering, OH 45429 · For profit - Corporation · 115 certified beds · (937) 949-3550 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (937) 949-3550 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0567)2 actual-harm citations
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3604 Wilmington Pike · (937) 294-0066 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1410 E Dorothy Ln · (937) 294-0535 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2930 Wilmington Pike · (937) 396-0096 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1512 Brownleigh Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1600 Brownleigh Rd · (734) 649-5417

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.6%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.8%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms81.1%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.2%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.5%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.1%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.5%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.8%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.5%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.0%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission35.9%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.7%12.9%12.0%typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 88 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.9%CMS range 45.2–65.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.2–13.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.1–13.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.941.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
0.85
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.63
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.11
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
49.4%
Total nursing turnover
35.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 102.7 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.63 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-06-14)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2021-11-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to timely notify the physician of signs and symptoms of dry gangrene toes and ankle which in turn resulted in delayed treatment. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #98's toes on the left foot began to show signs and symptoms of dry gangrene and the facility staff had not notified the physician in a timely manner. Resident #98 required a left above knee amputation (AKA) the same night he was sent to the hospital for acute limb ischemia and dry gangrene. This affected one (Resident #98) of three residents reviewed for wound care. Additionally, the facility also failed to ensure the accuracy of skin assessments. This affected two (#98 and #99) of three reviewed for skin assessments. The facility census was 95.1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged [DATE] with the following diagnoses: non-stemi elevation myocardial infarction (a type of heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of hospital records, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely treatments and interventions were completed for a resident's pressure ulcer. This resulted in Actual Harm on 01/14/25 when Resident #99 was hospitalized with a pressure ulcer to the sacrum which deteriorated in condition and developed purulent drainage and necrotic tissue from a delay in treatment. This affected one (Resident #99) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility identified six residents (#8, #11, #51, #76, #83 and #92) with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 95. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #99 revealed an admission date of 01/01/25 and a discharge date of 01/14/25. Diagnoses included chronic non-pressure ulcer of the left foot with muscle involvement, lobar pneumonia, atherosclerosis of the arteries of the extremities with intermittent claudication of the left leg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, peripheral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-28 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of facility environmental and pest control documents and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 99.Findings Included:Review of a facility document titled Environmental Safety/Maintenance, dated 03/16/2026 revealed a concern related to pests possible back in attic. During an interview on 05/26/26 at 11:10 AM, the Central Supply Clerk/Housekeeper (CSC) stated they had a racoon issue and had a company come out to trap them. The CSC stated two raccoons were caught about a week and a half prior. The CSC stated in January 2026, he noticed squirrels and had someone come out and trap them. He stated they heard them in the ceiling of the MedBridge B Unit. At that time, the Maintenance Director went into the attic and found droppings. The CSC stated that in February 2026, he found a hole in the corner of the courtyard and reported it to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan represented the resident's current status of having a pressure ulcer. This affected one (Resident #49) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included gastrostomy, gastrojejunal ulcer, cognitive communication deficit, unspecified atrial flutter, and malignant neoplasm of the prostate.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 was cognitively intact. Review of the Comprehensive Skin Evaluation dated 03/13/26 for Resident #49 revealed the resident had a stage II pressure ulcer to the coccyx present upon admission. Review of the baseline care plan dated 03/13/26 for Resident #49 revealed the stage II pressure ulcer was not listed and there were no interventions in place related to the pressure ulcer.Interview on 03/20/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for pressure ulcers for two residents (#106 and #107). This affected two residents (#106 and #107) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 99.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 02/25/26. Diagnoses included essential hypertension, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and acute kidney failure. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #106 cognitively intact and had an unstageable pressure ulcer upon admission.Review of the progress notes for Resident #106 dated 02/18/26 revealed the resident had a stage II pressure ulcer. Review of the care plan for Resident #106 revealed no plan or interventions for stage two pressure ulcer.2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #107…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #268 was observed urinating in Resident #50 and #68's closet. This affected two Residents (#50 and #68) out of three residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 97.Findings include:1.Medical record review for Resident #50 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, essential primary hypertension, hyperlipidemia, anorexia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), mixed hyperlipidemia, and major depressive disorder.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/01/25, for Resident #50 revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of the progress notes dated 12/12/25 at 11:50 A.M. for Resident #50 revealed on 12/09/25 Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #113 visited Resident #50 after an alleged incident with CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were provided timely upon request. This affected two residents (#97 and #101) of three reviewed for record requests. Facility census was 95. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #97 revealed an admission date of 05/31/23 and discharge date of 10/15/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, indicating intact cognition. Review of the authorization to disclose health information dated 06/23/25 revealed a record request was made for the entire electronic nursing home chart from dates 05/28/23 to 10/15/24 by an attorney handling the estate of Resident #97. Review of the letter dated 06/24/25 revealed a records request for Resident #97 requesting the electronic nursing chart. A handwritten note on the letter stated, emailed 07/01/25. Review of email communication dated 07/30/25 from the Administrator to Medical Records…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to address a resident's representative concerns regarding care concerns. This affected one (#105) out of the three residents reviewed for timely response to resident and/or resident representative concerns. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #105 revealed an admission date of 11/26/24 with medical diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, metabolic encephalopathy, hypertensive heart disease, congestive heart failure, and dysphagia oropharyngeal. The medical record indicated Resident #105 discharged from the facility on 12/29/24. Review of the medical record for Resident #105 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/19/24, which indicated Resident #105 had moderate cognitive impairment and required staff supervision with eating, bed mobility, and transfers, and required partial/moderate staff assistance for toilet hygiene and bathing. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to conduct quarterly care conferences. This affected two (#08 and #38) out of the three residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed an admission date of 07/18/22 with medical diagnoses of dementia, chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, anxiety, congestive heart failure (CHF), and atrial fibrillation. Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/07/24, which indicated Resident #08 was cognitively intact and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene and transfers, required partial/moderate staff assistance for bathing, and substantial/maximum staff assistance for bed mobility. Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed a quarterly care conference note on 09/11/24. Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed no documentation to support the facility had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to timely provide a therapeutic diet as per speech therapy recommendations. This affected one (#105) out of the three residents reviewed for diets. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #105 revealed an admission date of 11/26/24 with medical diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, metabolic encephalopathy, hypertensive heart disease, congestive heart failure, and dysphagia oropharyngeal. The medical record indicated Resident #105 discharged from the facility on 12/29/24. Review of the medical record for Resident #105 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/19/24, which indicated Resident #105 had moderate cognitive impairment and required staff supervision with eating, bed mobility, and transfers, and required partial/moderate staff assistance for toilet hygiene and bathing. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #105 received a mechanically altered diet, had no swallowing or chewing problems, and no weight loss. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered resulting in significant medication errors. This affected three (#08, #95, and #100) out of the five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed an admission date of 07/18/22 with medical diagnoses of dementia, chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, anxiety, congestive heart failure (CHF), and atrial fibrillation. Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/07/24, which indicated Resident #08 was cognitively intact and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene and transfers, required partial/moderate staff assistance for bathing, and substantial/maximum staff assistance for bed mobility. Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure surgical wound care was completed as ordered. This affected one (#95) out of the three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility also failed to ensure peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line dresses were changed as ordered. This affected two (#95 and #96) out of the three residents reviewed for intravenous (IV) or PICC line placement. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #95 revealed an admission date of 09/26/24 with medical diagnoses of chronic multifocal osteomyelitis, methicillin resistance staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), disorder of kidney and ureter, and conduct disorder. The medical record review revealed a discharge date of 10/14/24. Review of the medical record for Resident #95 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/02/24, which indicated Resident #95 was cognitively intact and was independent with toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of the MDS revealed Resident #95…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a new pressure ulcer was assessed, measured, and physician notified timely. This affected one (#51) out of the three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 10/11/24 with medical diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease, chronic kidney disease Stage III, diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, bipolar disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/18/24, which indicated Resident #51 was cognitively intact and was dependent upon staff for toileting and transfers, required substantial/maximum for bating and bed mobility. The MDS indicated Resident #51 was incontinence of bladder and bowel, was at risk for skin breakdown, and no pressure ulcers were present upon admission. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, observations and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This affected two (#04 and #14) out of the four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #04 revealed an admission date of 02/07/24 with medical diagnoses of atherosclerosis of native arteries, peripheral vascular disease, left hemiplegia, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the medical record for Resident #04 revealed a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/27/24, which indicated was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate staff assistance with bed mobility, was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene and transfers, and required substantial/maximum staff assistance for bathing. Review of the medical record for Resident #04 revealed a physician order dated 06/25/24 for metoprolol 25 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth two times per day. The order also stated to hold the medication if systolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, observations, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to follow infection control procedures during wound care. This affected one (#04) out of the three reviewed for wound care. The facility also failed to follow infection control procedures during medication administration. This affected one (#24) out of the three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #04 revealed an admission date of 02/07/24 with medical diagnoses of atherosclerosis of native arteries, peripheral vascular disease, left hemiplegia, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the medical record for Resident #04 revealed a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/27/24, which indicated was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate staff assistance with bed mobility, was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene and transfers, and required substantial/maximum staff assistance for bathing. The MDS indicated Resident #04 was at risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, and resident interviews the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as per physician order. This affected one Resident (#10) of three reviewed. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission date of 05/19/22. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, Diabetic retinopathy, bipolar disease and peripheral vascular disease. The resident remained in the facility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. He required extensive one person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, toileting and supervision for eating. Review of the physician orders revealed the following active orders: Combigan Ophthalmic (used to lower raised pressure in the eye) 0.2 Percent (%) - 0.5% into both eyes, two times a day for Glaucoma. The order had a start date of 12/26/23.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure routine medication was available for administration. This affected one (Resident #67) of 24 sampled residents. Findings include: A review of Resident #67's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 06/30/22, with diagnoses that included legal blindness, cataract extraction status right and left eyes, and bipolar disorder. Resident #67's Order Summary Report, revealed an order dated 08/14/2023, for Rocklatan Ophthalmic Solution 0.02-0.005%, instill one drop in both eyes at bedtime related to cataract extraction status right eye. Resident #67's medication administration record (MAR) for May 24 revealed staff initialed the MAR on 05/07/24, 05/08/24, 05/11/24, 05/13/24 - 05/18/24, 05/20/24, and 05/22/24 - 05/24/24 to indicate the Rocklatan Ophthalmic Solution was not available for administration. During an interview on 06/11/24 at 8:30 AM, Resident #67 stated they did have eye drops that sometimes did not get reordered on time, so the eye drops were not available for the staff to administer to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and Pharmacist interviews, the facility failed to administer medications as physician ordered. This affected two (#100 and #60) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #100 revealed admission date of 01/17/24. Diagnoses include cellulitis of left toe, type two Diabetes Mellitus, acute osteomyelitis left ankle and foot, Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus Areus (MRSA). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The resident remains in the facility. He was independent for eating, toileting, supervision for bed mobility and transfers. Review of the physician orders revealed an order for 12 Grams (gm) Nafcillin (antibiotic) to be given intravenously (IV) every 24 hours with a start date of 01/18/24. Record review of 01/18/24 progress note revealed Nafcillin was not available and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication were administered as ordered resulting in three medications errors out of 30 opportunities or a ten percent (%) medication error rate. This affected one (#64) out three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #64 revealed admission date of 11/11/23. Diagnoses include Metabolic Encephalopathy, stroke, anxiety and hypertension. The resident remains in the facility. Medication observation on 02/05/24 of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #100 for Resident #64 revealed Amlodipine (hypertension) five milligrams (mg), two Budesonide (steroid) three mg tablets, Buspar (antianxiety) 10 mg, Imodium (antidiarrheal) two mg, Vitamin D3 (supplement) 25 micrograms (mcg), Cholestyramine (cholesterol) four Grams, three Duloxetine (depression) 30 mg tablets, Plavix (anti platelet) 75 mg, Hydralazine (blood pressure) 10 mg, Nebivolol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage. This affected one (#65) out of three residents observed for medication storage. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #67 revealed admission date of 09/27/23. Diagnoses include orthopedic aftercare, spinal stenosis and cardiomegaly. The resident remained in the facility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #67 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition. Resident #67 required extensive two-person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, one person assistance for toileting and independent for eating. Further review of Resident #67's medical record revealed there was no documentation to support the resident was permitted to self-administer medications. During an interview on 02/05/24 at 12:47 P.M. with Resident #67, State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff interview, the facility failed to follow proper infection control procedures during incontinence care. This affected one (#14) out of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 86. Finding include: Review of medical record for Resident #14 revealed admission date of 06/22/23. Diagnoses include age related physical debility and chronic kidney disease. The resident remains in the facility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15 indicating the resident had impaired cognition. Resident #14 required extensive two person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, toileting and supervision for eating. A care plan relative urinary incontinence initiated 07/03/23 revealed individualized interventions which included to provide incontinence care as needed. And the bowel incontinence initiated 10/03/23 revealed interventions which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment. This affected three (#03, #12 and #36) residents of the six residents reviewed for homelike environment. The total facility census was 84. Findings Include: Record review of Resident #03 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes, muscle weakness and osteoarthritis of the knee. Review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS) assessment for Resident #03 dated 09/28/23, revealed the resident had intact cognition and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs). Record review of Resident # 12 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included lack of coordination, and pain of the left and right knees. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #12 dated 09/21/23, revealed the resident had intact cognition and was independent with locomotion. Record review of Resident # 36 revealed the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-08 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide residents' access to their personal funds daily, including weekends. This affected one (#47) of three reviewed for management of resident funds and the potential to affect 41 resident's accounts the facility manages. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Interview on 11/02/21 at 1:30 P.M., during the Resident Meeting, Resident #47 revealed an ongoing concern regarding the availability of resident funds managed by the facility. Interview on 11/02/21 at 2:51 P.M., with Payroll Clerk (PC) #14 confirmed the facility only allows residents to have access to their personal funds, Monday through Friday from 8:00 A.M. through 4:30 P.M. PC#14 confirmed the limited hours is because she is the only employee that has access to Petty Cash, and this is the funding used to allow residents to have access to their petty cash needs. PC#14 stated the residents are limited to accessing $50.00 cash from their personal accounts daily due to the limited monies the facility has available. If a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility policy review, and review of the planned menus approved by a Registered Dietitian (RD) #53 revealed the facility failed to follow planned menus for resident's on pureed and mechanically soft diets. This had the potential to affect 13 (#56, #43, #63, #13, #27, #35, #60, #49, #53, #20, #59, #36, #52) of 13 residents who had orders for either a pureed or mechanically soft diet. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Observations on 11/03/21 at 3:58 P.M. was started for the meal preparation and service for the evening meal. Review of the planned menu, approved by the Registered Dietitian (RD) #53, revealed that residents on a mechanically soft diet were to receive a #8 scoop (1/2 cup) of egg salad, or #8 scoop of ground hamburger if they had chosen the alternative menu item. In addition, the planned menu specified that resident's on a pureed diet were to receive a #8 scoop of pureed egg salad, and vegetable juice as an alternate for the cucumber salad being served to regular diets. Observation on 11/03/21 at approximately 4:30 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, revealed the facility failed to hold food prepared for service at acceptable temperatures. This had the potential to 77 of 77 residents who receive food from the kitchen with the exception of one resident (#12) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Meal preparation and service for the evening meal on 11/03/21 was observed beginning at 3:58 P.M. Observation on 11/03/21 at approximately 4:30 P.M., revealed [NAME] #65 making egg salad sandwiches for the evening meal. The sandwiches were for residents on a regular or mechanically soft diet. On completing the egg salad sandwiches the cook left the egg salad sandwiches setting out on trays in the kitchen, after covering the sandwiches. The sandwiches remained out on the counter, un-refrigerated, until tray assembly began at approximately 5:00 P.M. Cook #65 then took the temperatures of the food that had been prepared for the evening meal 4:53 P.M. The temperature of the egg salad on the sandwich tested was 54 degrees Fahrenheit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain dignity and respect for a resident when the resident was not assisted with dressing in daily clothes. This affected one ( #12) of three residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #12 was listed as a full code advance directive status. His diagnoses included: schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, obstructive sleep apnea, blindness in right eye, insomnia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, retention of urine, essential primary hypertension, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, dysphagia, aphasia dysphagia, anoxic brain damage, Barrett's esophagus, alcohol abuse, hepatomegaly, atypical atrial flutter, schizoaffective disorder, muscle atrophy, history of Coronavirus 2019 (COVID), and sequela. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff and resident interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to notify the physician according to the physician's orders when a resident's blood glucose level exceeded parameters defined by the order. This affected one (#47) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/27/20, with diagnoses including: end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus type one, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, anemia in chronic kidney disease, hydronephrosis with urethral stricture, retention of urine, cachexia, and dementia. Review of a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment of the resident dated 09/24/21 revealed the resident had good cognitive skills, was independent with or required only supervision to complete all activities of daily living. The resident was documented as receiving insulin injections daily at the time of the assessment. Review of the resident's physician orders revealed an order for Novolog (a rapid-acting insulin)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were weighed per physician order. This affected two (#58 and #430) of seven residents reviewed for weight. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #58 revealed admission date 06/24/21. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and secondary pulmonary arterial hypertension. Review of the Medicare Five Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of physician orders for October 2021 revealed an order dated 10/28/21 at 8:30 A.M., for daily weights one time a day for fluid overload for two weeks. Review of Resident #58's medical record and weight flowsheet revealed no evidence of a weight on 10/29/21, 10/30/21, and resident weight on 11/01/21 was disputed on 11/02/21 at 11:35 A.M. with a strike out. Daily weights resumed 11/02/21. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide physician ordered nutritional supplementation to prevent further weight loss and/or promote weight gain. This affected one (#36) of six residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed an admission on [DATE], with diagnoses including: atherosclerotic heart disease, dysphagia, anorexia, age-related physical debility, dementia with behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, diabetes mellitus type two, and chronic lymphatic leukemia of B-cell type in remission. Review of a quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/09/21, revealed Resident #36 had moderate cognitive impairment, and required supervision with limited assistance from staff to completed all activities of daily living with the exception of eating for which she required set-up help only. The resident was 59 inches tall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents oxygen tubing was dated and documented as changed weekly per facility policy. The affected two (#58 and #430) of three residents reviewed for respiratory treatments. The facility identified 16 residents who received respiratory treatments. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #58 revealed admission date 06/24/21. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and secondary pulmonary arterial hypertension. Review of the Medicare Five Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was assessed to use oxygen. Review of the plan of care dated 10/21/21 revealed Resident #58 had altered cardiovascular status related to hypertension and atrial fibrillation. Interventions included give oxygen as ordered by the physician. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, and review of facility policies, revealed the facility failed to keep all medications in locked compartments except when being administered by licensed nursing staff. This affected one (#42) and an undetermined number of residents who potentially could have had accessed the medications. The facility census of 78. Findings include: Observation on 11/02/21 at 8:29 A.M., of the conference room, revealed unidentified pills and pill cups scattered on the floor, and also setting on the bottom shelf of a white computer desk. The Unit Manager, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #18 was then asked to come to the conference room to observe the pills and pill cups. She verified there were pills and pill cups scattered on and around the white computer desk in the conference room at that time. On further observation there were a total eight pills and five pill cups, some pills were in the cups and some were on the floor near the cups. LPN #18 was able to identify the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-28 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide written copies of 48 hour (baseline) care plans to residents. This affected eight Residents (#7, #13, #31, #34, #45, #53, #63 and #67) out of ten newly admitted residents reviewed. The census was 99 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/20/18. Diagnoses included hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, schizophrenia, and chronic kidney stage 4. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 was cognitively intact. Further review of Resident #53's medical record revealed no documentation of Resident #53 or representative being given a written copy of a baseline care plan for admission dated 07/20/18. 2. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/28/18. Diagnoses included hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus, neuropathy, anxiety disorder, major…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medication storage area observation and staff interview, the facility failed to properly label and store medications. The affected three (#144, #44 and #34) residents medications that were observed opened/undated and three (100 hallway, 400 hallway and Med Bridge B) of five medication storage areas observed. The census was 99. Findings include: 1. Observation on [DATE] at 11:02 A.M. of the Med Bridge B medication cart revealed expired stock bottles of the medication Vitamin B 12, Decubi Vite Three in One, and Meclizone. Review of the medication bottles revealed the Vitamin B 12 100 expired on 12/18, the Decubi Vite Three in one expired on 09/18, and the Meclizone expired on 10/18. Continued observation of the medication cart revealed a vial of Ipratropium Bromide/Albuterol Sulfate inhalation solution and a Dulera Inhalation Aerosol with no prescription label or resident identification information. Further observation of the Med Bridge B medication cart, revealed an opened and undated bottle of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review and staff interview; the facility failed to ensure advanced directives being stored in the hard chart and electronic health record (EHR) were consistent. This affected two (#31 and #49) of 32 residents reviewed for consistency of advanced directives. The census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include hemiplegia, bacteremia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, insomnia, major depressive disorder, dysphagia, pain, constipation, muscle spasm, atrial fibrillation, stage four pressure ulcer of the sacral region. Review of Resident #31's EHR revealed the resident code status was do not resuscitate comfort care arrest (DNRCC-A). Review of Resident #31's hard chart revealed the residents code status was full code. There was no DNR identification form located in the residents chart. Interview on 02/26/19 at 12:16 P.M. with registered nurse (RN) #99 verified the EHR for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-28 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a resident assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). This affected one (#21) of two resident reviewed for ADL's. The census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include cellulitis, restlessness and agitation, benign prostatic hyperplasia, retention of urine, hypertension, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, anemia, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, constipation, peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #21's care plan revealed the resident required assistance for bathing. The residents goal was to be neat, clean, and odor free. The care plan revealed the resident preferred bathing twice a week. Review of the annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #21 was totally dependent of two people with physical assistance for bathing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review and staff interview, the facility failed thoroughly assess a non-pressure skin alteration. This affected one (#31) of two resident review for alterations of the skin. The census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include hemiplegia, pressure ulcer of the right heel, bacteremia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, insomnia, major depressive disorder, dysphagia, pain, constipation, muscle spasm, atrial fibrillation, stage four pressure ulcer of the sacral region. Review of a physician order dated 08/16/18, revealed Resident #31 was ordered wound care for an open area located on the residents coccyx. The order was to cleanse the area with IHWC (in-house wound cleanser); apply collagen matrix and cover with a foam dressing. The wound dressing was to be changed every day and as needed. Review of the medical record revealed there was no assessment of the open area located on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary care and services to promote healing of an unavoidable pressure sore to the coccyx specifically when Resident #67 was observed on three days of the survey without position changes. This affected one (#67) out of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 99 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #67's admission record, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including intraventricular hemorrhage, cerebral vascular accident with post hemorrhagic obstructive hydrocephalus status, anemia, arthritis, chronic bronchitis, chronic pain, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dyspnea, edema, fibromyalgia, hiatal hernia, hypertension, and emphysema. The admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the cognitively impaired resident required extensive assistance of staff with bed mobility, transferring, dressing, eating,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to monitor a residents blood sugar including notifying a physician and implement their hypoglycemia policy when a resident's blood sugar was below ordered parameters. This affected one (#7) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility identified 22 residents currently receiving blood sugar checks. The facility census was 99 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/28/18. Diagnoses included hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus, neuropathy, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and weakness. Review of a comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of physician orders revealed a physician order dated 02/19/18 for Humalog (insulin) per sliding scale before meals. For blood sugars less than 60 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) and greater than 500…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-28 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a resident list, resident and staff interview and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure the resident was seen by the dentist on a yearly basis for routine dental hygiene. This affected one (#39) out of two resident reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #39 documented an admission date of 09/28/16 with diagnosis including hemiplegia, pluerodynia, contractures of left hand, left foot, left hip and left ankle, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, pain, dysphagia, depression and anxiety disorder. Further review documented his payer source as Medicaid Buckeye MyCare for long term care. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #39 was moderately cognitively impaired, required an extensive two person assist with personal hygiene which included brushing his teeth and there lacked any documentation of mouth or facial pain. Review of entire medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-06-14 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the posted staffing document included the total number and the actual hours worked for each discipline and failed to ensure the staffing document reflected any staff absences due to call-offs or illness. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's document titled Report of Nursing Staff Directly Responsible for Resident Care, for the time frame from 05/13/2024 through 06/13/2024, used by the facility to post the daily staffing, did not reflect the actual hours worked for each discipline nor did it reflect any staff absences or changes due to call-outs or illness. The Report of Nursing Staff Directly Responsible for Resident Care document did not include any RN hours for 05/31/2024 and 06/10/2024. A document titled, Daily Coverage Report, for 05/31/2024 and 06/10/20024 revealed there was RN coverage that was not reflected on the facility's Report of Nursing Staff Directly Responsible for Resident Care forms for 05/31/2024 and 06/10/2024.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
APT, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2024
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2024
PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2024
JONES, MALLORIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
3313 WILMINGTON PIKE OH OWNER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
SNF OH HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WELL INTEGRA MASTER JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WELL PM HOLDCO JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WELLTOWER INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
KAHLON, GURJEETIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
−$352K
Related-party expense-5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 25%Medicare 5%Other / private 70%

This home reported −$352K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$309per resident / day
operating cost
$9,404per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$270per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365616. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next