Mentor Hills Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 146 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 147 beds and averages 115.0 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-07-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program to prevent the development of pressure ulcers, to timely identify new pressure ulcers and to ensure wound care was completed as ordered. This affected two residents (#51 and #79) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 102. Actual Harm occurred on 07/12/24 when Resident #51, who had a history of pressure ulcers, was dependent on staff assistance for most all activities of daily living (ADL) including toileting, hygiene, shower, dressing, transfers, and required partial to moderate assistance with rolling left and right in bed, was found to have an in-house acquired Stage III pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss, subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle are not exposed, slough may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss, may include undermining and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0774 — isolated
  Help the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure transportation to and from a planned physician appointment for Resident #94. This affected one (Resident #94) of three residents reviewed for transportation assistance. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of right lung, malignant neoplasm of lower right lung, cerebrovascular disease, hypertension, vertigo, hyperlipidemia, anxiety, major depression, gastro esophageal reflux, and abnormal gait. Review of facility document dated 03/25/25, revealed Resident #94 was to have an appointment on 05/02/25 for a CT (computed tomography) of the chest, abdomen, pelvis and a Radiation Oncology appointment to establish a new patient. In addition, on 05/08/25 Resident #94 was to have an appointment with Hematology and Oncology to establish Resident #94 and infusion therapy. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and facility policy review, the facility failed to use appropriate transmission-based precautions (TBP) for Resident #84, utilize enhance barrier precautions (EBP) when indicated for Residents #12, #57 and #58 and failed to perform wound care using appropriate infection control practices for Residents #1, #12, #41, and #57. This affected one resident (#84) out of two residents reviewed for TBP, affected three residents (#12, #57 and #58) of six residents reviewed for EBP and affected four residents (#1, #12, #41, and #57) of six residents reviewed for wound care. The facility reported 27 residents (#1, #5, #7, #9, #12, #15, #17, #21, #24, #25, #32, #34, #35, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #52, #53, #54, #58, #80, #84, #85, #91 and #302) who had EBP, and 23 residents (#1, #4, #7, #12, #17, #21, #24, #39, #40, #41, #42, #52, #53, #54, #57, #58, #77, #84, #85, #90, #91, #298 and #302) who had wounds.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of record, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to offer/hold quarterly care conference meetings for Resident #21 and/or her representative. This affected one resident (#21) of one resident reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 03/07/23. Diagnoses included chronic diastolic heart failure, paraplegia, morbid obesity, fibromyalgia, and colostomy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/01/25, revealed Resident #21 had no memory impairment, was alert and cooperative with normal energy. Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed Interdisciplinary Team (IDT)/Care Conference Notes revealed the only documented evidence of care conferences were on 06/30/23, 03/23/24, and 10/07/24 only. Interview with Resident #21 on 02/10/25 at 8:36 P.M. revealed the resident understood what a care conference was. She denied attending a care plan meeting for a long time. In a follow-up interview with Resident #21 on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and review of the menu and spreadsheet, the facility failed to provide the alternate entree at the appropriate portion size. This affected two residents (#24 and #73) of two residents observed to receive the alternate on lunch on 12/18/24 out of 98 residents receiving food from the kitchen (Resident #53 was ordered nothing by mouth). Facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the menu for Week Two revealed a meal on Wednesday (corresponding to 12/18/24) lunch including cheese ravioli with marinara sauce with a portion size listed as one cup. Review of the diet guide spreadsheet for Day 11 Wednesday (corresponding to 12/18/24) lunch revealed the entrée of cheese ravioli with marinara sauce was to be provided in a one-cup portion for those on a regular diet. Observation on 12/18/24 starting at 11:37 A.M. revealed trayline was set for the lunch meal consisting of chicken, cranberry orange sauce, Brussels sprouts, garden blend rice, dinner roll and an alternate of cheese ravioli in marinara sauce. Observation while Certified Dietary Manager (CDM)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure resident treatments were completed and/ or documented as ordered. This affected two residents (#58 and #93) out of four residents reviewed treatments. This had the potential to affect 17 residents (#7, #14, #23, #27, #45, #48, #51, #58, #67, #73, #79, #85, #86, #89, #90, #91, and #99) identified by the facility with a treatment order other than barrier cream. The facility census was 102. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed an admission date of 05/10/23 with diagnoses including hypertension, anxiety disorder, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and weakness. Review of the care plan dated 07/18/23 revealed Resident #58 had an alteration in skin integrity due to left ankle arterial ulcer. Interventions included check dressing for placement during the provision of routine care and services, document wound status weekly, heel lift suspension boots to be worn as tolerated,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure medical records were maintained in an accurate manner including not documenting the completion of treatments that were not done as ordered. This affected two residents (#58, and #79) out of eight residents medical records reviewed for accuracy. The facility census was 102. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed an admission date of 05/10/23 with diagnoses including hypertension, anxiety disorder, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and weakness. Review of the care plan dated 07/18/23 revealed Resident #58 had an alteration in skin integrity due to left ankle arterial ulcer. Interventions included check dressing for placement during the provision of routine care and services, document the wound status weekly, heel lift suspension boots to be worn as tolerated, and treatments per order. Review of the Wound Nurse Practitioner (NP) #692 progress note dated 07/12/24 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 95 residents provided food and beverages from the facility. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Observations on 09/12/22 from 10:10 A.M. to 10:24 A.M. during the initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager #458 revealed the overhead vents above the grill top were greasy and dusty as was the back ledge behind the grill top, the light bulbs above the grill top, and the fire extinguisher nozzles. Inside the microwave was dirty. The sanitizer in one of the sanitizer buckets wasn't at a high enough concentration to be effective. The sanitizer was used for wiping down the counters. The ceiling had areas that were dirty/dusty. These findings were verified by Dietary Manager #458 at the time of the observations. On 09/14/22 at 12:20 P.M. [NAME] #454 used a gloved hand to reach into an open bag and place hamburger buns on the resident's plates. Use of a serving utensil was required. On 09/14/22 at 12:22 P.M. Dietary Manager…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure call light cords were accessible to residents. This affected four residents (Resident's #20, #51, #53, and #74) of 26 residents observed for appropriate call light cord placement. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an initial admission date of 11/21/19, and a re-admission date of 01/31/20 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis left non-dominant side, mild cognitive impairment, and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #20 revealed the resident had moderate to severe cognitive impairment, required assistance with daily hygiene and oral care related to cerebral vascular accident- left sided hemiparesis. Review of the care plan for Resident #20 indicated the resident required assistance to bathe/shower, and daily hygiene, grooming, dressing, oral care, and eating as needed. The resident also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment. This affected nine (Resident's #9, #19, #27, #32, #36, #67, #68, #69 and #81) of 51 residents residing on the 200/300 hall. The facility also failed to clean wheelchairs. This affected five (Resident's #15, #34, #56, #62 and #84) of 59 residents who utilize wheelchairs. The facility census was 95. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 02/26/22. Diagnoses included adult failure to thrive, diabetes mellitus, and major depressive disorder. Resident # 9 had intact cognition. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 12/27/19. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy and major depressive disorder. Resident #19 had intact cognition. Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 09/16/18. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder and anxiety disorder. Resident # 27 had intact cognition. Review of the medical record for Resident #32…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to date and or document name on insulin vials/Kwik pens after opening. This affected six (Resident's #9, #18, #19, #36, #37 and #55) of 12 residents who required insulin. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 02/26/22. Diagnosis included diabetes mellitus. Resident # 9 had intact cognition. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 08/21/22 for a Humalog mix 75/25 Kwik pen. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 06/23/21. Diagnosis included type two diabetes mellitus. Resident # 18 had intact cognition. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 06/28/22 for glargine insulin solution. 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 12/27/19. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy. Resident #19 had intact cognition. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 03/09/22 for glargine insulin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $366K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH