Sycamore Trails Post Acute
450 Oak Ridge Boulevard, Miamisburg, OH 45342 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 102 certified beds · (937) 866-8885 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $11,037 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-27)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (56%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.6% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 96.3% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.2% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 31.5% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.5% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.0% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 38.5% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.5%CMS range 34.5–68.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 7.7–18.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 4.7–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 68.6 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital documentation, review of written statements, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate staff assistance during a bed bath resulting in an avoidable fall. This resulted in Actual Harm on 05/31/24 when State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #275 rolled Resident #70 away from her during a bed bath and the resident rolled out of bed onto the floor. Subsequently, Resident #70 was transferred to the Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation and treatment and required a suture to close a forehead laceration. This affected one (#70) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 03/15/24. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, malignant neoplasm of the brain, left hemiplegia, depression, and obesity. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #70 was cognitively intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to schedule a blood transfusion as ordered for Resident #273 after critical laboratory (lab) results were received. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #273 was hospitalized due to symptoms of chest pain and shortness of breath and required blood transfusions. This affected one (Resident #273) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure Resident #24's wound dressing was applied as ordered. This affected one (Resident #24) of one resident reviewed for wound care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #34 received timely antibiotic treatment for a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). This affected one (Resident #34) of three residents reviewed for UTIs. The facility failed to ensure a resident received timely treatment following a fall. This affected one (Resident #62) four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Medical record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interviews, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to administer medications in a timely manner. This affected four (Residents #29, #73, #10, and #44) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 11/11/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and DM II. Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 had intact cognition as evidenced by a BIMS score of 13. The resident was assessed to require supervision with eating, partial assistance with toileting, bathing, dressing, and transfers. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed medications ordered for the morning. Observation on 12/23/24 at 12:14 P.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #30 administered morning medications to Resident #29. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician orders. There were two medication errors out of 37 opportunities resulting in a 5.4 percent medication error rate. This affected one (Resident #14) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 02/27/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, type two Diabetes Mellitus (DM II), and atrial fibrillation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three. The resident was assessed to require setup with eating, toileting, bathing, dressing, and independent with transfers. Review of the physician order dated 09/13/24 revealed Resident #14 was ordered K-Phos Oral tablet 500…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to administer medications per physician orders and further failed to ensure Controlled Drug Records (CDR) were maintained. This affected one resident (#10) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 12/20/23 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant neoplasm of upper-outer quadrant of right female breast, major depressive disorder and secondary malignant neoplasm of bone. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/8/24, revealed Resident #10 was cognitively intact. Resident #10 required set-up assistance for eating, required substantial assistance for bathing and bed mobility and was dependent on staff assistance for toileting hygiene, dressing and personal hygiene. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 10/01/24 through 10/31/24 revealed Ativan oral tablet one milligram (mg)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene was performed following incontinence care. This affected one resident (#20) of four residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 12/27/20 with diagnoses of idiopathic aseptic necrosis of right femur, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/20/24, revealed Resident #20 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #20 required partial assistance with personal hygiene and was dependent on staff assistance with toileting hygiene, dressing, bed mobility and transfers. Observation on 11/18/24 at 9:55 A.M. of incontinence care for Resident #20 and completed by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #190, revealed CNA #190 knocked on the door when entering the room, explained the procedure to the resident, closed the door to the room, gathered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications by ensuring the resident was on the lowest ordered dose of an antipsychotic. This affected one (#4) of three residents reviewed for psychoactive medications. The census was 82. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/23/24. Diagnoses listed included cerebral palsy, schizoid disorder, anxiety disorder, depression, and pseudobulbar affect. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was cognitively intact. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 07/25/24 for Olanzapine (antipsychotic) 10 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth at bedtime for Schizoaffective disorder. An order dated 09/05/24 was for Olanzapine 10 mg give one tablet by mouth at bedtime. Review of outpatient psychiatry notes revealed Olanzapine was increased to 20 mg at bedtime for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were observed taken by residents and not left at the beside. This affected one (#3) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The census was 82. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record reviewed an admission date of 08/09/24. Diagnoses listed included displaced comminuted fracture of the left tibia, injury of the popliteal artery, comminuted fracture of the left fibula, and asthma. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact. Observation on 09/25/24 at 1:58 P.M. revealed five pills in a medication cup sitting on a bedside table. Interview with Resident #3 during the observation revealed his nurse had left them for home to take. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #100 on 09/25/24 at 2:01 P.M. confirmed she had left pills at Resident #3 bedside to take. RN #100…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff and pharmacist interviews, the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were provided as physician ordered resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (#12) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Facility census was 78 Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 03/22/24. Diagnoses include bipolar, anxiety, hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Resident #12 required supervision for bed mobility, transfers, toileting and eating. Review of physician records for Resident #12 revealed an order for Imipenem-Cilastatin (antibiotic) intravenous solution reconstituted 500 milligrams (mg)-give intramuscularly four times daily with a start date of 09/02/24. Review of the September 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff observed resident consume medications. This affected one (#20) out of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 04/26/24 with medical diagnoses of urinary tract infection, sepsis, diabetes mellitus, diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, and congestive heart failure. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #20 was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated Resident #20 was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene and bathing and required substantial staff assistance with bed mobility. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed physician orders dated 06/19/24 for hydralazine 50 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth three times per day and levothyroxine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide meals per resident choice and per the facility planned menu. This affected three (#33, #55 and #70) out of three residents reviewed for meals and had the potential to affected 78 residents residing in the facility who receive their meals from the facility, the facility identified two residents (#47, #65) who receive nothing by mouth (NPO). Facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the May 2024 Menu revealed the posted breakfast for 05/13/24 was cold cereal, hard boiled egg, bagel, fruit cup and two percent milk. Observation on 05/13/24 from 9:06 A.M. to 9:28 A.M. of three residents (#33, #55 and #70) breakfast trays revealed their tickets did not match what was served. Observation and interview on 05/13/24 at 9:06 A.M. revealed the breakfast ticket for Resident #70 was cold cereal, two hard boiled eggs, half bagel and half cup of fruit. Observation of the breakfast meal served was bacon, toast, two hard boiled eggs and a fruit cup. Observation and interview on 05/13/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate intervention and/or supervision to ensure residents did not possess illegal drugs and/or drugs not prescribed to the resident. Additionally, the facility failed to implement a resident's care plan to ensure adequate supervision was provided during a meal. This affected three (#54, #47 and #74) of three residents reviewed for supervision related to illegal drug usage and one (#27) of three residents reviewed for supervision with meals. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #54 revealed admission date of 10/23/24 admitted to hospice on 11/22/23. Diagnoses include cirrhosis of the liver, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia, depression and history of cocaine abuse. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 required extensive one person assistance for toileting and supervision for bed mobility, eating and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to update resident care plan to include a resident's possession and suspected use of illegal substances. This affected one (#54) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #54 revealed admission date of 10/23/24 admitted to hospice on 11/22/23. Diagnoses including cirrhosis of the liver, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia, depression and history of cocaine abuse. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 required extensive one person assistance for toileting and supervision for bed mobility, eating and transfers. A brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Review of the progress note dated 03/10/24 revealed staff had found a plastic baggie with an unknown substance lying on the floor next to the bed. The Director of Nursing (DON) was informed. Review of the progress notes revealed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure treatments orders were completed as ordered. This affected one (#55) of three residents reviewed for implementation of treatments. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #55 revealed admission date of 01/16/24. Diagnoses include congestive heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus, and depression. Additional diagnosis added on 04/25/24 of aftercare following surgical amputation, left below the knee amputation and history of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus. The resident remained in the facility. Review of Resident #55's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Resident #55 required extensive two-person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, toileting and supervision for eating. A care plan for an alteration in skin integrity to the left below knee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, physician and pharmacy staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as physician ordered. This affected two (#134 and #55) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #134 revealed admission date of 11/23/23. Diagnoses include paraplegia and schizophrenia, depression and anxiety. Resident #134 remains in the facility. Review of Resident #134's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Resident #134 required extensive two-person assistance for bed mobility, transfers and supervision for eating. Review of the physician orders revealed an order for Estrogens Conjugated Vaginal Cream 0.625 Milligrams/Gram. Insert 0.5 Grams vaginally one time a day for vaginal dryness. Review of medication administration record (MAR) and the progress note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, medication administration time review, and policy review, the facility failed to administer physician ordered medications and ensure medications were timely order to have available for administration. This affected four #21, #41, #58 and #63 of eight residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 11/23/18, with diagnoses of other seizures, epilepsy, intractable, without status epilepticus, and hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and unspecified affecting left nondominant side. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #21 was cognitively intact. Review of physician orders dated 11/14/23, to administer Oxcarbazepine tablet, 300 milligrams (mg), give 2 tablets by mouth at bedtime for epilepsy and give 1 tablet by mouth, one time a day for epilepsy; Pepcid tablet (famotidine) 20 mg,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, review of staffing records/schedules and policy review, the facility failed to provide timely Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) assistance. This affected one (#11) out of three residents reviewed for ADL assistance and had the potential to affect 21 (#11, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34) residents on the 300 and top of the 100 hallway assignment. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed admission date of 05/27/22 with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition on The resident was admitted with diagnoses including anxiety, depression, sleep apnea and stage three kidney disease. The resident remains in the facility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she required extensive two-person assistance for transfers, toileting, one person assistance for bed mobility and supervision for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, review of staffing records/schedules and policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient staffing to provide timely assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). This affected one (#11) out of three residents reviewed for ADL assistance and had the potential to affect 21 (#11, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34) residents on the 300 and top of the 100 hallway assignment. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed admission date of 05/27/22 with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition on The resident was admitted with diagnoses including anxiety, depression, sleep apnea and stage three kidney disease. The resident remains in the facility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she required extensive two-person assistance for transfers, toileting, one person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were followed during wound care. This affected one (#14) of three residents reviewed for wound care. Facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #14 revealed admission date of 03/10/24. Diagnoses include diabetes mellitus type two, necrotizing fasciitis, acute osteomyelitis left ankle and foot. The resident remains at the facility. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Resident #14 required extensive one person assistance for toileting and supervision for eating, bed mobility and transfers. Review of Resident #14's physician orders revealed an order to cleanse wound with normal saline, pat dry with non-sterile gauze and reapply wound vacuum negative pressure on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays with a start date of 03/25/24. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of controlled substance records, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's narcotic medication administration was accurately documented in the medical record. This affected #81 of three residents reviewed. The census was 78. Findings include: Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/19/23. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, hypertensive heart failure, hemiplegia, type two diabetes mellitus, and chronic leg ulcer. Review of a quarterly Minimum data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #59 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 11/02/23 for Percocet (narcotic pain medication oxycodone and acetaminophen) five and 325 milligrams (5-325 mg) give 5-325 every four hour as needed (PRN) for pain. Give every four hours PRN for general discomfort repositioning, relaxation, distraction and comfort measures provided and ineffective.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to properly prepare medications for administration. This affected six (#9, #14, #47, #26, #51, #44) out of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The census was 57. Findings include: Observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #136's medication cart on 08/31/23 at 6:42 A.M. revealed there were six medication cups stacked on top of each other with names on each cup (Resident 9, #14, #47, #26, #51, and #44). Each of the medication cups contained pre-poured medications. Interview with LPN #136 on 08/31/23 at 6:45 A.M. confirmed she had pre-poured the six resident's (#9, #14, #47, #26, #51, #44) medications. She indicated she was not aware she shouldn't pre-pour the medications for the residents. Review of the policy titled Medication Administration, dated 11/01/21, revealed when medications are administered by mobile cart taken to the resident's location (room, dining area, etc.) medications are administered at the time they are prepared. Medications are not pre poured either in advance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received enteral feeding as ordered. This affected one (#28) out of three residents reviewed for enteral feeding. The facility identified a total of three residents who required enteral feeding. The census was 57. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 03/05/20. Resident #28's medical diagnoses included lymphoma, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, and cerebrovascular accident. Review of Resident #28's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/12/23, revealed Resident #28 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #28's functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility and total dependence for transfers and eating. Resident #28 was coded as having a feeding tube. Review of Resident #28's physician orders, dated 08/25/23, revealed an order for Jevity 1.2 calories to infuse at 60 milliliters (ml) an hour (hr) times 24 hours via G-tube (feeding tube). Observation of the G-tube for Resident #28 on 08/30/23 at 11:02…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received meals as preferred and requested. This affected three (#24, #25, and #48) out of three residents reviewed for meal preferences. The census was 57. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 01/10/14. Resident #24's medical diagnoses included epilepsy and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/09/23, revealed Resident #24 was moderately cognitively impaired. He required supervision for eating. Review of the menu for 08/30/23 revealed breakfast was to consist of a westem omelet, hash browns, wheat toast, margarine, and jelly. The lunch meal was to consist of baked tilapia, buttered noodles, peas and carrots, wheat bread, margarine, banana and strawberries. Review of the breakfast meal ticket for Resident #24 on 08/30/23 at 8:10 A.M. revealed it said one salt, one pepper, 3/4 cup of cold cereal, four ounces of assorted juice, eight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to conduct initial and quarterly care conferences. This affected four (Residents #173, #174, #33, and #14) of six residents reviewed for care conferences. Additionally, the facility failed to update residents care plans. This affected two (Residents #24 and #34) of six residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #173's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/26/22. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and pneumonia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #172 was cognitively intact. Further review revealed no documentation of Resident #173 having an initial care conference with staff members. A comprehensive care plan was initiated on 08/09/22. 2. Review of Resident #174's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/02/22.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate grooming services for two (Residents #60 and #2) of two reviewed for grooming. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents received scheduled/preferred showers. This affected three (Residents #33, #14, and #46) of three residents review for bathing. The census was 72. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 05/31/19. Medical diagnoses included cerebrovascular attack (CVA), seizure disorder, and respiratory failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 was rarely or never understood and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, personal hygiene, and toileting. Resident #60 was totally dependent upon staff for bathing and was frequently incontinent of urine and stool. Review of Resident #60's care plan dated 05/09/22 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a root cause analysis was completed on a resident who suffered a fall with a fracture. This affected one (Resident #62) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility also failed to ensure water temperatures in resident rooms were below 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). This had the potential to affect 57 (Residents #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #12, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #21, #22, #23, #24, #26, #27, #29, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #67 and #68) residents who resided on the 100, 200 and 300 halls. The census was 72. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility in 2013. Diagnoses included epilepsy, chronic respiratory failure, cardiac arrest, and dysphagia. Review of the care plan dated 01/11/22 revealed Resident #62 had urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was properly stored in the refrigerator, freezer, and dry storage areas. This affected all residents except Residents #51 #60 and #63 who do not eat food from the kitchen. The census was 72. Findings include During observation of the dry storage area on 08/15/22 at 8:44 A.M., there was a bag of gravy and a bag of oats in that had expiration dates of 07/30/22. Bags of dry pasta (spiral, macaroni and bowtie) was left open to air and undated. In the freezer, a bag filled with balls of raw cookie dough was left open to air and undated and a bag of breakfast sausage patties was left undated. In the refrigerator, a sheet cake of carrot cake and a sheet cake of yellow cake were not fully covered, chicken in what appeared to be barbeque sauce in Tupperware was left undated, sliced cucumber and lunch meat were found to be undated. During interview on 08/15/22 at 8:44 A.M., Kitchen Manager #228 confirmed all above findings regarding food storage. Review of facility policy titled Food Storage, dated November…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to timely respond to a resident's request to return to bed and use the bed pan. This affected one (Resident #46) of two residents reviewed for accommodations of needs and dignity. Additionally, facility failed to ensure residents were able to eat meals in the dining room. This affected all residents accept Residents #51, #60 and #63 who did not eat food from the kitchen. The census was 72. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 12/19/20. Medical diagnoses included arthritis due to bacteria in the right hip, diabetes, osteomyelitis unspecified site and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and personal hygiene. The resident was occasionally incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to notify a resident's representative of changes in condition that required physician intervention. This affected two (Residents #62 and #34) of two residents reviewed for notification for change in condition. The census was 72. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #62 was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included epilepsy, chronic respiratory failure, cardiac arrest, and dysphagia. Review of progress notes dated 08/08/22 revealed Resident #62 was found on the floor in his bathroom attempting to transfer himself from the toilet to the wheelchair. Vital signs were within normal limits but he complained of pain to his right elbow. The physician was texted and awaiting reply. Neurological checks were initiated. There was no documentation the resident's representative was notified. Review of fall investigation dated 08/08/22 revealed Resident #62 was assisted to the toilet by staff and reminded to use the call light when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide ongoing re-evaluation for the need of a seatbelt/restraint and failed to initiate a care plan with interventions for the use of a seatbelt/restraint. This affected one (Resident #62) of one resident reviewed for physical restraints. The facility census was 72. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #62 revealed an admission date 12/17/13. Medical diagnoses included epilepsy, chronic respiratory failure, cardiac arrest, and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Review of Resident #62's physician orders revealed an order dated 01/23/21 to place a seatbelt when seated in wheelchair. Review of Resident #62's care plan dated 01/22/22 revealed the resident was at risk for falls with an intervention in place to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility failed to ensure residents received requested vision services. This affected one (Resident #55) of two residents reviewed for vision services. Facility census was 72. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #55 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included heart failure, diabetes type two, end stage renal disease on dialysis, anemia and hypertension. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was cognitively intact and was independent with set up assistance. The resident did not wear corrective lenses. During interview on 08/15/22 at 4:33 P.M., Resident #55 revealed he had not seen the eye doctor and would like to see someone about getting glasses. He said he had asked several nurses and spoke with the social worker about getting an appointment but had not heard an update. During interview on 08/17/22 at 10:33 A.M., the Administrator and Social Services Staff (SS) #118 confirmed Resident's #55 had requested to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of manufacturer's guidelines, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled properly. This affected two (Residents #6 and #25) of five residents reviewed for medications. The census was 72. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted on [DATE]. During observation 08/15/22 at 10:32 A.M., revealed there was a cup of medication pills sitting on Resident #6's bedside table. During interview on 08/15/22 at 10:36 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #109 confirmed the medicine cup of pills for Resident #6 was sitting on the bedside table. She stated the resident was slow to take her medications and that was why she left them at the bedside. She stated the resident had been assessed to take her own medications. Review of the medical record revealed no assessments stating Resident #6 could self administer medications. During interview on 08/15/22 at 10:40 A.M., Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide adaptive equipment during meal service. This affected one (Resident #62) of one resident reviewed for adaptive equipment. The census was 72. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #62 was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included epilepsy, chronic respiratory failure, cardiac arrest, and dysphagia. Review of the care plan dated 01/11/22 revealed Resident #62 was at risk for altered nutritional status including but not limited to respiratory failure, cardiac arrest, history of anoxic brain injury. He needed adaptive equipment, and assistance at meals. Interventions were for adaptive equipment with elevated lip and suction bowels, built up silverware and sippy cup. Encourage and assist as needed to consume foods and no straws. Review of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/27/22 revealed Resident #62 was moderately cognitively impaired. He required supervision for eating with one person physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-07-12 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personal funds account balances, facility surety bond, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the surety bond was sufficient to cover account balances. This had the potential to affect 38 Residents (#2, #5, #8, #11, #16, #18, #19, #20, #22, #25, #27, #28, #30, #32, #33, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #43, #46, #48, #50, #57, #62, #63, #64, #66, #67, #70, #71, #73, #77, #81, #87, #90, and #92) whom had a personal funds account managed by the facility. Facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of trial balance of all residents personal fund accounts managed by the facility revealed a total balance of $24,706.83 on 07/11/19. Review of facility surety bond dated 09/01/18 revealed a bond amount of $20,000.00 to cover resident trust funds. Interview on 07/12/19 at 11:27 A.M. with business office manager (BOM) #30 confirmed the surety bond was not sufficient to cover resident personal fund accounts as the account balances exceeded the amount of the surety bond. The facility confirmed the insufficient surety bond had the potential to affect 38 Residents (#2, #5,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-12 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ombudsman, residents and/or their representatives were notified of transfer or discharge in writing. This affected five (#3, #22, #68, #92 and #100) of five residents reviewed. The facility census was 104. Findings include: 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility [DATE]. Review of the progress notes dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was being sent to a local hospital for suicidal ideations. 2. Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was sent out to local hospital on [DATE] for a blood transfusion from a gastrointestinal bleed and expired on [DATE] at the hospital. 3. Record review revealed Resident #92 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of progress notes dated [DATE] revealed the resident returned from the hospital at 10:29 A.M., but was transferred to the hospital again at 10:48 P.M. Further review of the medical record revealed there was a a transfer/discharge form but it didn't have the correct components…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of Food From Outside Sources and In-Room Refrigerators Policy, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled, covered, discarded and the pantry refrigerator was maintained at an acceptable temperature. This had the potential to affect 68 residents (#2, #3, #4, #5, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #22, #23, #24, #25, #27, #28, #29, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #42, #43, #44, #46, #47, #48, #50, #51, #54, #56, #58, #59, #62, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #71, #73, #74, #77, #79, #81, #82, #85, #90, #95, #96, #97, #150, #250) whom resided on the 100, 200, and 300 halls. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Observation on 07/11/19 at 3:02 P.M. of the refrigerator located on the 300 hall for residents whom resided on the 100, 200, and 300 halls revealed a temperature of 54 degrees Fahrenheit (F), a plastic bag of deli sliced meat dated 05/15/19 for Resident #24, a lunch tray with an uncovered dessert dated 07/11/19 for Resident #23, one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided dignity when staff placed her name on the front of her shirt. This affected one (#33) of one resident reviewed for dignity. The census was 104. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 08/10/18. Medical diagnoses included heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and dementia. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, toileting use and she was supervision for eating. Observation of Resident #33 in the hallway, in her wheelchair, on 07/09/19 at 3:35 P.M. revealed she had a pink shirt on, with her first name printed in big black letters on the front of the shirt. Interview on 07/09/19 at 3:39 P.M. with Resident #33 revealed she didn't like her name printed on the front of shirt, but said what am I going to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-12 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a Pre admission Screen and Record Review (PASARR) when a resident was diagnosed with a mental illness. This affected one (#2) of one resident reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident had a PASARR screening completed on 02/18/16 indicating the resident had no indication of serious mental illness nor a developmental disability. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 03/14/18 the resident was diagnosed with unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, and on 12/11/18 the resident was diagnosed with anxiety disorder. Review of most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was not cognitively intact, had hallucinations, but no other behaviors. The resident was coded as receiving seven days of anti-psychotic and anti-depressant medication and one day of anti-anxiety medication.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely provide baseline care plans to resident's and/or their responsible party. This affected one (#43) of 13 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The total facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include hemiplegia, dysphagia, anxiety, depression, insomnia, weakness, hypertension, gastro esophageal reflux disease, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcoholic hepatitis without ascities, iron deficiency anemia, history of falling and history of transient ischemic attack. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, vision and hearing were adequate without assistive devices, had no dental problems. The resident had no behaviors, delusions or hallucinations during the review period. The medical record contained no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely review and revise a resident's comprehensive care plans to ensure the care plan accurately reflected the residents status and care needs. This affected one (#12) of 28 resident care plans reviewed during the survey. The total facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypokalemia, aphasia, falls, partial traumatic amputation of left lower leg, hypoxemia, weakness, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, anemia, chronic ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, history of transient ischemic attack, nicotine dependence, vitamin D deficiency, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, and visual loss. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was alert and oriented, had no delusions, hallucinations, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff and resident interview the facility failed to ensure water that was accessible to residents was at an acceptable temperature. This affected one (#11) of one resident reviewed for accidents. The total facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, anemia, irritable bowel syndrome, heart failure, gout, depression, hypertension, obesity, hereditary idiopathic neuropathy, atrial fibrillation, depression, dementia, lack of coordination, and age related debility. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, had no delusions, hallucinations or behaviors including rejection of care. The resident required extensive assist for all care from staff including eating. The resident was frequently incontinent of both bowel and bladder. The resident was coded as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to properly manage Resident #41's pain while providing tracheostomy care. This affected one (#41) of four residents reviewed for pain management program. The facility identified 74 residents who were on a pain management program. Facility census was 104. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #41 revealed an admission of 05/16/19. Her medical diagnoses included heart failure, neurogenic bladder, quadriplegia, and respiratory failure. Review of admission Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility, eating and toilet use and transfers only occurred once or twice. She was coded for the use of oxygen, suctioning, and tracheostomy care. Review of physician orders for Resident #41 dated 05/17/19 revealed orders for Tylenol Tablet 325 milligram (mg) give every six hours as needed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a residents narcotic pain medication was reordered timely. This affected one (#54) of four residents reviewed for pain management program. The facility identified 74 residents who were on a pain management program. Facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Resident #54's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was listed as extensive one person assists for activities of daily living. Review of the physician orders dated 05/27/19 revealed an order for: Hydrocodone- Acetaminophen tablet 5-325 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth every 12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and facility staff interview the facility failed to timely respond to pharmacy recommendations, this affected one (#2) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The total facility census was 104. Findings Include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of weakness, shortness of breath, dyspnea, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, hypertension, osteoarthritis, depression, constipation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, glaucoma repeated falls and hyperlipidemia. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set revealed the resident was cognitively impaired, had hallucinations, but no other behaviors. The resident required extensive assist for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting and was supervision for eating. The resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident was on a mechanically altered therapeutic diet. Resident #2 was coded as receiving seven days of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to store medications as per manufacturer recommendation for Resident #32. This affected one of four medication carts observed. The facility has seven medication carts. Findings Include: Observation of 200-1 medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #79 on 07/12/19 at 1:41 P.M. revealed Latanoprost 125 micrograms (mcg.)/25 milliliters (ml.) ophthalmic solution was undated. LPN #79 confirmed there was no date on the bottle and the resident was ordered to have the medication at bedtime with the dose for administration being one drop to each eye. LPN #79 confirmed the medication was initially ordered in April 2019 and the facility re-ordered the medication in May 2019 and no medication had been ordered since May 2019. The LPN verified there was no way to determine how long the bottle of ophthalmic solution had been in use, and should be discarded. Review of the package insert for Latanoprost ophthalmic solution revealed under storage: protect from light, once a bottle is opened for use, it may be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-12 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility to ensure a resident with missing dentures was referred to a dentist for treatment. This affected one (Resident #41) of three reviewed for personal property. The census was 104. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #41 revealed an admission of 05/16/19. Review of the admission Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 was cognitively intact. Review of progress notes from 06/09/19 through 07/09/19 for Resident #41 revealed no documentation the resident had missing dentures. Interview with the resident's family on 07/09/19 at 10:38 A.M. revealed the resident's dentures had been missing for about three weeks and he reported it to Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #12. LSW #121 went on vacation and whoever was filling in for him couldn't find anything in the medical record he had spoken to anyone about the missing dentures. Interview with LSW #121 on 07/10/19 at 1:38 P.M. revealed the family did speak to him…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands after providing care to a resident who was in isolation for Clostridium difficile (C-diff). This affected one (#41) of one resident reviewed for handwashing in C-diff isolation. The facility identified only one resident (#41) in C-diff isolation. The census was 104 Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #41 revealed an admission of 05/16/19. Diagnoses included heart failure, neurogenic bladder, C-diff and respiratory failure. Review of admission Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) assessment, dated 05/23/19, revealed Resident #41 was cognitively intact and had a tracheostomy. Observation of suctioning for Resident #41 on 07/09/19 at 11:01 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #78 was performing suctioning care and after she completed it she used the hand sanitizer that was on the wall and left the room. Interview with LPN #78 on 07/09/19 at 11:39 A.M. verified she should have washed her hands with soap and water since the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-06-27 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. This had the potential to affect all 79 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the personnel record for Activity Director (AD) #250 revealed a hire date of 06/20/23 as a housekeeper. The personnel record indicated AD #250 was promoted to Activity Director on 02/05/24. Review of AD #250's personnel record revealed no documentation to verify AD #250 had the appropriate training and/or education to hold the position of Activity Director. Interview on 06/24/24 at 4:09 P.M. with AD #250 confirmed she had been promoted from a housekeeper position to the Activity Director in February 2024. AD #250 stated worked as a nurse aide at an Assisted Living facility prior to her employment at the facility and assisted the residents at that facility with activities. AD #250 confirmed she had not received any education and/or training to be a qualified Activity Director. AD #250 stated she worked full…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer to residents or their representatives. This affected five (Residents #3, #31, #66, #273, and #73) of five residents reviewed for transfer to the hospital. The census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/16/21. Diagnoses include anemia, hypertension, muscle weakness, and heart failure. Resident #31 was sent to the emergency room (ER) on 07/09/22 for low blood pressure and elevated temperature. Further review revealed no documentation of a written notice of transfer/discharge being provided to Resident #3 and/or their representative. 2. Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/23/18. Diagnoses listed included epilepsy, anxiety disorder, aphasia, ataxia, and major depressive disorder. Resident #31 was sent to the ER on [DATE] for a change in condition. Further review revealed no documentation of a written notice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2022-08-25 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide bed hold notices to residents or their representatives. This affected five (Residents #3, #31, #66, #273, and #73) of five residents reviewed for transfer to the hospital. The census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/16/21. Diagnoses include anemia, hypertension, muscle weakness, and heart failure. Resident #31 was sent to the emergency room (ER) on 07/09/22 for low blood pressure and elevated temperature. Further review revealed no documentation of a bed hold notice being provided to Resident #3 and/or their representative. 2. Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/23/18. Diagnoses listed included epilepsy, anxiety disorder, aphasia, ataxia, and major depressive disorder. Resident #31 was sent to the ER on [DATE] for a change in condition. Further review revealed no documentation of a bed hold notice being provided to Resident #31…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$11,037 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $11,037 — penalty dated 2024-06-27
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| APT, FREDERICK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2024 |
| PACS GROUP, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2024 |
| PACS HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2024 |
| PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2024 |
| CHANEY, STEVE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| 450 OAK RIDGE BOULEVARD OH OWNER LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| SNF OH HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WELL INTEGRA MASTER JV LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WELL PM HOLDCO JV LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| HUNTER, ROBERT | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $231K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365640. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.