No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Three Meadows Post Acute

10540 Fremont Pike Rd, Perrysburg, OH 43551 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (419) 874-3578 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent May 2025Resident-funds citation (F0567)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
27322 Carronade Dr · (567) 336-4662 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
27322 Carronade Dr · (567) 336-4659 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
10382 Fremont Pike · (419) 874-0540 · Call to confirm hours
Park
9477 Bishopswood Ln · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.1%5.3%15.4%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.0%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms50.6%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.2%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.9%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication35.6%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.1%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.8%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.2%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.4%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.5%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.1%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.9%12.9%12.0%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.8%CMS range 38.0–66.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 7.0–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
1.21
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.70
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
50.5%
Total nursing turnover
27.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 94.3 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-15)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2022-12-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

65 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of wound care provider documentation, review of hospital documentation, staff interview, family interview, nurse practitioner interview, review of the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel 2025 guidelines, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to provide a timely assessment, ongoing monitoring, and interventions to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for Resident #05, who was known to have arterial and venous insufficiency, and who was identified at risk for pressure ulcers. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious physical harm, injuries, and/or negative health outcome on 09/07/25 when Resident #05 was found with an unstageable pressure ulcer to the right malleolus (ankle) underneath an ankle monitoring device. The unstageable pressure ulcer was not accurately assessed, and no interventions were initiated. On 09/08/25 the wound was assessed as an unstageable pressure ulcer and an intervention for wound treatment was to elevate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of wound center documentation, staff interview, and review of a facility clinical protocol, the facility failed to provide timely assessment, monitoring, and interventions to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer. Actual harm occurred when Resident #56, who was assessed at moderate risk for pressure ulcer development, had care plan interventions for skin checks each shift with no documented evidence of the skin checks completed. Subsequently, the resident was discovered with a unstageable pressure ulcer (obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss) to the left lateral heel and no ongoing assessments were completed to determine causative factors of the wound development or need to change pressure reduction interventions. Resident #56's wound required surgical debridement and ongoing treatment applications as a result. This affected one (#56) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a locked compartment. This had the potential to affect all residents residing on the first and second floors, except 13 (#250, #251, #252, #253, #254, #255, #256, #257, #258, #259, #260, #261, and #262) residents identified by the facility as residing on the secured memory care unit. The facility census was 91.Findings include:1. Observation on 03/10/26 at 10:30 A.M. revealed a medication cart next to the first-floor nurses' station was unattended and unlocked.Interview on 03/10/26 at 10:31 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #130 confirmed the medication cart next to the first-floor nurses' station was left unattended and unlocked.2. Observation on 03/11/26 at 12:00 P.M. revealed a medication cart next to the second-floor nurses' station was unattended and unlocked.Interview on 03/11/26 at 12:04 P.M. with LPN #142 confirmed the medication cart next to the second-floor nurses' station was unattended and unlocked.Review of the facility policy titled,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure protected health information (PHI) remained secure. This affected one (#155) of one resident observed for PHI. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #155 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure, heart disease, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, peripheral venous insufficiency, a history of falling, and transient ischemic attacks.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment, dated 02/13/26, revealed Resident #155 was cognitively intact and did not display any behaviors nor refusal of care at the time of the assessment. He utilized a wheelchair and required maximal to dependent levels of assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs).Observation on 03/11/26 at 12:00 P.M. revealed a medication cart at the second-floor nurses' station with a laptop open, displaying the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to utilize enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and perform hand hygiene to prevent the spread of infection. This affected two (#165 and #185) of two residents observed for the use of EBP. The facility census was 91.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #165 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including stage four chronic kidney disease, osteoporosis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, and muscle wasting.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment, dated 12/05/25, revealed Resident #165 was cognitively impaired and did not display any behaviors nor refusals of care at the time of the assessment. She utilized a wheelchair and required maximal to dependent assistance with mobility, transfers, and activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of the physician orders for Resident #165 revealed an order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with identified hearing concerns were seen timely by the audiologist. This affected one resident (#82) of three residents reviewed for ancillary services. The facility census was 101. Findings Include:Review of Resident #82's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/24/24. Diagnoses included endometrium cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lymphedema, anxiety disorder, osteoarthritis, depression, and unspecified hearing loss.Review of Resident #82's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating Resident #82 was cognitively intact. Resident #82 had moderate difficulty hearing. Resident #82 was on hospice at the time of the review. Review of Resident #82's care plan revised 12/22/25 revealed supports and intervention for risk for pain, self-care deficit, risk for falls, terminal illness and receiving hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure post fall follow up assessments were completed and care planned fall interventions were implemented. This affected one resident (#52) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 101. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included neuroleptic induced Parkinsonism, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominate side, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, repeated falls, adrenocortical insufficiency, chronic kidney disease stage 3B. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #52 was independent with eating, needed set up or clean up assistance with oral hygiene, substantial/maximal assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure physicians orders were followed for oxygen therapy and the use of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). This affected one (#94) of three residents reviewed for assistive breathing devices. The census was 101.Findings Included:Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 02/17/22. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), acute on chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease stage three, and dysphagia.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/03/25, revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and eating. Resident #94 required the use of a motorized wheelchair for mobility and was dependent on staff for transferring using a mechanical lift. Resident #94 was frequently incontinent of bowel and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication was available as prescribed. This affected one (#94) of two residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 101.Findings Included:Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 02/17/22. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), acute on chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease stage three, and dysphagia.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and eating. Resident #94 required the use of a motorized wheelchair for mobility and was dependent on staff for transferring using a mechanical lift. Resident #94 was frequently incontinent of bowel and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident representatives and physicians were notified of changes in condition. This affected one (#05) of three residents reviewed for changes in condition. The facility census was 83. Review of the medical record for Resident #05 revealed an admission date of 06/14/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia, hypertension, repeated falls, anemia, peripheral vascular disease, orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, Methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection, occlusion and stenosis of carotid artery, and unstageable pressure ulcer of sacral region, acquired absence of right leg above knee, and protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #05 had severe cognitive impairment. The resident had no unhealed pressure ulcers. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review. The facility failed to ensure surgical wound care was completed per physician orders. This affected one resident (#43) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility identified five residents with surgical wounds. The facility census was 83. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 09/10/25 and a readmission date of 10/23/25. Diagnoses included pneumonia, anxiety, and surgical aftercare following surgery of the digestive system.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the physician orders dated 11/18/25 revealed the resident had a surgical wound to the right upper quadrant mid abdomen. The orders were to cleanse the wound with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply skin prep to the skin surrounding the wound, apply the antibacterial dressing and foam, change three times per week on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of bowel records, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure bowel movements were accurately documented and failed to ensure the bowel protocol was followed when a resident was without a bowel movement for greater than three days. Additionally, the facility failed to timely complete a bowel assessment for a resident with a known history of constipation who had no documented bowel movements for six days. This affected one (#74) of three residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. The facility census was 83. Review of the medical record for Resident #74 revealed an admission date of 02/17/22. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and osteoarthritis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was always incontinent of bowel and frequently incontinent of bladder. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 53 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, staff interview, resident interview, family interview, and policy review revealed the facility failed to ensure medical documentation was complete and accurate. This affected two (#5, #51) of three residents reviewed for clinical documentation and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 83. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #05 revealed an admission date of 06/14/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia, hypertension, repeated falls, anemia, peripheral vascular disease, orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, Methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection, occlusion and stenosis of carotid artery, and unstageable pressure ulcer of sacral region, acquired absence of right leg above knee, and protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were maintained during wound care. This affected one (#05) of four residents reviewed for wound care. The facility identified 29 residents with enhanced barrier precautions. The facility census was 83. Review of the medical record for Resident #05 revealed an admission date of 06/14/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia, hypertension, repeated falls, anemia, peripheral vascular disease, orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, Methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection, occlusion and stenosis of carotid artery, and unstageable pressure ulcer of sacral region, acquired absence of right leg above knee, and protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #05 had severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for one (#43) of four residents reviewed for call light accessibility. The census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 06/14/24. Diagnoses included venous insufficiency, multiple sclerosis, and osteoporosis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 was cognitively intact, dependent for toileting, showering/bathing, upper body dressing, lower body dressing, and required substantial/maximal assistance for personal hygiene. Observation on 05/12/25 at 10:26 A.M. revealed the call light laying on the floor beside Resident #43's bed. Interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #449 on 05/12/25 at 10:47 A.M. verified Resident #43's call light was lying on the floor out of the resident's reach. Observation on 05/12/25 at 10:48 A.M. revealed CNA #492 attached the call light to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean environment. This affected two (6 and #49) of four residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 04/14/25. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, asthma, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, type II diabetes, and anxiety. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 04/21/25 revealed Resident #6 was cognitively intact. Observation on 05/12/25 at 9:45 A.M. of Resident #6's room revealed a cup with popcorn coming out of it all over the floor. Observation and interview on 05/12/25 at 1:43 P.M. of Resident #6's room revealed the popcorn remained on the floor. Resident #6 stated the popcorn on the floor bothered her and she would like it to be cleaned up. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Manager #475 on 05/12/25 at 1:52…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who received psychotropic medications were monitored for behaviors, adverse effects, and efficacy. This affected one (#24) of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medications. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety, depression, and hypertension. Review of the plan of care dated 03/24/25 revealed Resident #24 received antidepressant medication. Interventions included monitoring and documenting side effects and effectiveness. Review of the plan of care dated 03/24/25 revealed Resident #24 received antianxiety medication. Interventions included monitoring and documenting side effects and effectiveness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 was cognitively intact. The resident received antianxiety and antidepressant medication.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide ongoing assistance and coordination, with resident involvement, in developing discharge goals and plans for discharge. This affected one (#62) of one residents reviewed for discharges in a facility census of 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, venous insufficiency, segmental and somatic dysfunction of the lower extremity, major depressive disorder, hypertension, dysphagia, and right artificial hip joint. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was assessed with intact cognition, utilized a wheelchair for mobility, was independent with activities of daily living, was occasionally incontinent of bladder and was continent of bowel, and assessed at risk for pressure ulcer development with no skin breakdown. Review of Resident #62's social service admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate staff assistance and implement fall interventions during care to prevent falls. This affected one (#19) of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 02/26/24 with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, anxiety, and dementia, repeated falls. Resident #19 was under hospice care. Review of the modified quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/31/24, revealed Resident #19 was dependent for toileting and required substantial/maximal assistance for bed mobility. Further review revealed Resident #19 did not have any falls since the previous assessment. Review of the current care plan, initiated 02/26/24, revealed Resident #19 was at risk for falls due to impaired balance, impaired mobility, and incontinence. Further review of the care plan revealed Resident #19 had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the dialysis contract, the facility failed to ensure effective communication took place between the facility and the dialysis center. This affected one (#34) of one residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included end-stage renal disease, heart failure, type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 was cognitively intact. The resident was assessed to receive dialysis. Review of Resident #34's active physician orders for May 2025 identified an order for dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Review of Resident #34's dialysis communication forms for 03/01/25 through 05/08/25 revealed each form had three sections. The first section was to be completed by nursing staff prior to dialysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were provided as ordered by the physician and within prescribed time frames. This resulted in 12 of 28 medications being administered in error with an error rate of 42.86 percent (%). This affected three (#53, #16, and #74) of four residents observed for medication administration in a facility census of 81. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/13/25 at 10:21 A.M. noted Registered Nurse (RN) #482 preparing medications for Resident #53. The medications included the medication to treat symptoms of Parkinson's disease Carbidopa-Levodopa 25-100 milligrams (mg), the anticonvulsant medication divalproex delayed release 125 mg, the heart failure medication Sacubitril-Valsartan 24-26 mg, the antihypertensive medication Hydralazine 25 mg, and the pain medication Tylenol eight (8)-hour extended release 650 mg two tablets. Continued observation at 10:31 A.M., revealed RN #482 administered the medications to Resident #53 one-by-one using a spoon. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered, and within ordered time frames, to prevent significant medication errors. This affected three (#53, #16, #74) of four residents observed for the administration of medications in a facility census of 81. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/13/25 at 10:21 A.M. noted Registered Nurse (RN) #482 preparing medications for Resident #53. The medications included the medication to treat symptoms of Parkinson's disease Carbidopa-Levodopa 25-100 milligrams (mg), the anticonvulsant medication divalproex delayed release 125 mg, the heart failure medication Sacubitril-Valsartan 24-26 mg, and the antihypertensive medication Hydralazine 25 mg. Continued observation at 10:31 A.M., revealed RN #482 administered the medications to Resident #53 one-by-one using a spoon. Review of the medical record noted Resident #53's physician orders and prescribed time frames listed on the medication administration record (MAR) noted the following; the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the diet manual guidance, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items had an appropriate texture. This had the potential to affect two (#51 and #231) of two residents on a pureed diet. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 11/24/21 with diagnoses of dysphagia and anorexia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 had severely impaired cognition and was able to feed himself with setup or clean-up assistance and received a mechanically altered diet. Review of the physician order dated 02/20/25 revealed Resident #51 received a regular diet with pureed consistency and thin liquids. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #231 revealed an admission date of 05/12/25 with diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Review of the nursing admission evaluation, dated 05/12/25, revealed Resident #231 was in a coma/persistent vegetative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident meal trays were served in a sanitary manner. This affected one (#62) of seven residents observed during dining services. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 11/06/23 with diagnoses of anxiety, repeated falls, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/14/25, revealed Resident #62 had intact cognition and was able to eat independently. Observation on 05/12/25 at 11:43 A.M. revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #550 was passing the noon meals trays. CNA #550 entered Resident #62's room and placed a meal tray on the resident's overbed table. Also present on the overbed table was a urinal with urine in it. Interview on 05/12/25 at 11:44 A.M. with CNA #550 confirmed Resident #62's urinal, containing urine, was on the overbed table and CNA #550 placed a meal tray on the same table. CNA #550 stated she did not realize the urinal was on the table. Subsequent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly store medications. This affected one resident (#78) reviewed for medications left at bedside. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of hyperlipidemia, polyneuropathy, and history of urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of the current physician orders dated 08/24 for Resident #78 revealed she was prescribed Cranberry 300 milligrams (mg) (used for UTI prevention), Atorvastatin 40 mg (used to control high cholesterol), and Gabapentin 600 mg (used for nerve pain). Review of Resident #78's medication administration record (MAR) reveaeld Cranberry 300 mg was scheduled to be administered at 9:00 A.M., 1:00 P.M., and 9:00 P.M. daily, Atorvastatin 40 mg was scheduled to be administered at 9:00 P.M. daily and Gabapentin 600 mg was scheduled to be administered at 9:00 A.M., 1:00 P.M., and 9:00 P.M. daily. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and hospice staff interviews, review of medication information from Medscape and facility medication administration policy, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure medication was administered in accordance with physician orders. This resulted in a significant medication error when one resident received an anti-hypertensive blood pressure medication outside of physician prescribed administration parameters. This affected one (#1) of five sampled residents reviewed for the administration of medications. The facility census of 85. Findings include: Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, ventricular tachycardia, cardiac pacemaker, seizure disorder, pulmonary hypertension, pleural effusion, left clavical fracture, and cerebral vascular accident affecting left non-dominant side with hemiplegia and hemiparesis. According to the minimum data set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, review of the medical record, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely transferred using a mechanical lift per the care plan and facility policy. This affected one (#48) of one residents observed for a mechanical lift transfer. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 06/30/22. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, polyneuropathy, epilepsy, and contractures. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for transfers. Review of the care plan dated 03/06/24 revealed Resident #48 had an activities of daily living (ADLs) self-care deficit with an intervention including mechanical transfers with the assistance of two staff. Continuous observation on 04/02/24 from 10:50 A.M. to 10:55 A.M. revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #90 wheeled Resident #48…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received timely incontinence care. This affected one (#41) of three residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. The census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right side (dominant) after a cerebral infarct, compression of the brain, aphasia, rheumatoid arthritis, dementia, ulcerative colitis, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 was assessed with severely impaired cognition, dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) including transfers and repositioning. Resident #41 utilized a wheelchair propelled by staff for mobility, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and was at risk for pressure ulcer development. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the facility was adequately staffed to ensure a dependent resident received timely incontinence care. This affected one (#41) of three residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. The census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right side (dominant) after a cerebral infarct, compression of the brain, aphasia, rheumatoid arthritis, dementia, ulcerative colitis, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 was assessed with severely impaired cognition, dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) including transfers and repositioning. Resident #41 utilized a wheelchair propelled by staff for mobility, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and was at risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician of medication being unavailable from the pharmacy for administration. This affected one (Resident #76) of three reviewed for medications. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #76 revealed an admission date of 12/29/22 with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic kidney disease, hypertensive heart disease, congestive heart failure, type two diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and asthma. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #76 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance for activities of daily living. Review of the care plan dated 11/15/22 for Resident #76 revealed the resident had altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing related to COPD. Interventions included administer medications as ordered. Review of physician orders for Resident #76 revealed an order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician orders. This affected one Resident (#76) of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #76 revealed an admission date of 12/29/22 with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic kidney disease, hypertensive heart disease, congestive heart failure, type two diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and asthma. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #76 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance for activities of daily living. Review of the care plan dated 11/15/22 for Resident #76 revealed the resident had altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing related to COPD. Interventions included administer medications as ordered. Review of physician orders for Resident #76 revealed an order for Dupixent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an admission skin assessment was completed, and failed to ensure wound treatments were entered into the electronic medical record and completed per physician orders. This affected one (Resident #79) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 09/23/23 and a discharge date of 10/15/23. Diagnoses included sepsis, encephalitis and encephalomyelitis, enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile, acute kidney failure, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic systolic heart failure, chronic kidney disease stage three, atrial fibrillation, and atherosclerosis of coronary artery bypass graft. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #79 had intact cognition. The resident required the extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the menu was reviewed by the facility's dietitian. The had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified three residents who did not receive food from the kitchen (Resident #41, Resident #50, and Resident #189). The facility census was 85. Findings include: Observation of the menus on 11/29/22 at 10:32 A.M. revealed no dietitian's signature. Interview on 11/29/22 at approximately 1:31 P.M. with the Food Service Director (FSD) #272 revealed the menu was created by the previous Food Service Director and was not the menu provided by the corporation. Interview on 11/29/22 at 3:43 P.M. with the Registered Dietitian (RD) #333 revealed the previous Food Service Director modified the men, and the current menu was not reviewed by the RD #333.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the dishwashing machine was hot enough to sanitize the dishes. The had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified three residents who did not receive food from the kitchen (Resident #41, Resident #50, and Resident #189). The facility census was 85. Findings include: Observation on 11/29/22 at 1:29 P.M. revealed Dietary Aide #221 washing noon meal dishes. Observation of the dishwasher rinse temperature revealed it reached 115 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Interview on 11/29/22 at approximately 1:31 P.M. with the Food Service Director (FSD) #272 confirmed the dishwasher rinse temperature was 115 degrees F and was an inadequate temperature to sanitize the dishes properly. He stated the rinse temperature should be at least 180 degrees F. Further interview revealed the heat booster was turned off, and FSD #272 subsequently turned it back on. The FSD #272 was unable to specify how long the heat booster was turned off, stating it had to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, review of pharmacy receipts and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician order. This affected four (#13, #63, #133, and #193) of 23 residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #193's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/23/22. Diagnoses included urinary tract infection, type II diabetes, muscle wasting and atrophy, anemia, hypertension and chronic lymphocytic leukemia of B-cell type not having achieved remission. Review of the admission Evaluation dated 11/23/22 revealed Resident #193 was alert and oriented. Review of a plan of care focus area initiated 11/25/22 revealed Resident #193 had a bowel elimination alteration of diarrhea. Interventions included administer medications as ordered. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #193 had orders Nystatin external cream 100000 unit/gram (gm) apply to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach of residents. This affected two (#184 and #188) of two residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #184's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/06/22 and a readmission date of 11/15/22. Diagnoses included hypo-osmolality, generalized anxiety disorder, sarcopenia, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, type II diabetes and major depressive disorder. Review of the admission Evaluation dated 11/15/22 revealed Resident #184 was alert and oriented. Observation on 11/28/22 at 10:06 A.M. revealed Resident #184 sitting in a chair, positioned to the right at the foot of the bed. The call light was clipped to the sheet on the left side of the bed near the head of the bed. Interview at the time of the observation with Resident #184 revealed she needed assistance reaching her walker, which was folded and leaning against the wall to her left. Resident #184 stated she was unable to reach her call light to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-05 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, review of activity participation records, observation, and review of activity schedules, the facility failed to ensure residents choices were honored to be out of bed when desired and to attend activities of choice. This affected one (Resident #36) of two residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type II, cognitive communication deficit, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarct affecting the left side, asthma, morbid obesity, major depressive disorder, atrial fibrillation, bipolar disorder, insomnia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypokalemia, pulmonary hypertension, post traumatic stress disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, osteoarthritis, diverticulosis, and sarcopenia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/04/22, revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-05 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, review of facility records and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to personal funds. This affected one (#7) of four residents reviewed for resident trust accounts. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 02/12/19 and a readmission date of 11/09/20. Diagnoses included of hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, obstructive sleep apnea, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/03/22, revealed Resident #7 had intact cognition, Review of facility records revealed Resident #7 had a Resident Trust account. Interview on 11/27/22 at 11:56 A.M. with Resident #7 revealed the facility did not have money available for him when he requested it to purchase a pizza. Further interview revealed he was familiar with the hours during which money should be available. Interview on 11/30/22 at 1:57 P.M. with Receptionist #233 confirmed residents come to her to withdraw money from their accounts. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a code status was accurately portrayed in the resident's medical record. This affected one (Resident #2) of 28 residents reviewed. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 10/20/21 with a readmission date of 10/29/21. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, anemia, sarcopenia, venous insufficiency, obstructive sleep apnea, and insomnia, generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/24/22,revealed Resident #2 had intact cognition. Review of the current physician orders for Resident #2 revealed an order dated 04/21/22 for Full Code status. Review of the current care plan for Resident #2 revealed she had a Full Code status. Observation of the paper chart on 11/28/22 at 2:01 P.M. revealed Resident #2 had a red Do Not Resuscitate, Comfort Care-Arrest (DNRCCA) sign in her chart along with a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form signed by the nurse practitioner on 04/07/22.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician when ordered medications were unavailable. This affected one (#193) of one resident reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident #193's medical record revealed and admission date of 11/23/22. Diagnoses included type II diabetes, muscle wasting and atrophy, anemia, hypertension and chronic lymphocytic leukemia of B-cell type not having achieved remission. Review of the admission Evaluation dated 11/23/22 revealed Resident #193 was alert and oriented. Review of the plan of care initiated 11/23/22 revealed Resident #193 had had insulin dependent diabetes. Interventions included administer medication per physician orders. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #193 had orders for the insulin Lyumjev KwikPen Subcutaneous Solution Pen-Injector 100 unit/milliliter (ml) inject 4 units subcutaneously two times daily only if sugar was over…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the resident census, resident interview, staff interview and review of the facility admission packet, the facility failed to provide written bed hold notification to a resident upon transfer to the hospital. This affected one (#61) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/24/22 and a readmission date of 11/15/22. Diagnoses included sepsis, muscle wasting and atrophy, altered mental status, osteoporosis, dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, morbid obesity, type II diabetes, congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #61's census revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #61's medical record revealed no documentation the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents that required assistance with shaving were provided adequate care and services and further the facility failed to provide personal hygiene for a resident with dry skin. This affected two residents (#55 and #56) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/22/20. Diagnoses included cerebral infarct due to a thrombosis of the right vertebral artery, contracture's left and right hands, pain in joints, memory deficit, dysphagia, pharyngeal phase, sarcopenia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left (non dominant), diabetes mellitus type II, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/14/22, revealed Resident #55 was cognitively intact, active and able to make decisions about care. Resident #55 required two person physical assistance with part of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure splint devices were applied as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#56) of one residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility identified Resident #56 as the only resident in the facility with orders for a splint. The census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/17/20. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, cognitive communication deficit, heart failure, muscle wasting and atrophy, diabetes mellitus type II, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 09/06/22 revealed Resident #56 was assessed with intact cognition, required extensive one person physical assistance with personal hygiene and dressing, and was assessed with functional limited range of motion affecting one side of Resident #56's upper extremities. Review of a physician order dated 08/11/22 revealed Resident #56 was ordered a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of drug manufacturer's instructions, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This resulted in three medication errors of 28 total opportunities for a medication error rate of 10.71%. This affected one (#133) of three residents observed during medication administration. The census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident #133's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/25/22. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, muscle wasting and atrophy, peripheral vascular disease, and diabetes mellitus type II. Review of a physician order dated 11/25/22 revealed Resident #133 was ordered the anti-anxiety medication Buspar 10 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice daily for anxiety. Review of a physician order dated 11/25/22 revealed Resident #133 was ordered insulin Glargine 56 units subcutaneously (SQ) every morning and at bedtime. Review of a physician order dated 11/25/22 revealed Resident #133 was ordered the supplement Vitamin D3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of drug manufacturer's instructions, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure insulin was administered as ordered. This affected one (#133) of three residents observed during medication administration and one (#193) of one residents reviewed for insulin usage. The facility identified 25 residents in the facility with orders for insulin. The census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #133's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/25/22. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, muscle wasting and atrophy, peripheral vascular disease, and diabetes mellitus type II. Review of a physician order dated 11/25/22 revealed Resident #133 was ordered insulin Glargine 56 units subcutaneously (SQ) every morning and at bedtime. Observation on 11/29/22 at 8:37 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #288 prepared to administer Resident #133 her morning medications. LPN #288 removed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of drug manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to ensure insulin was stored in a safe manner. This affected two (#28 and #40) of eight residents who had insulin stored in the North One, South Two, and Subacute Two medication carts. The facility identified 25 residents in the facility with orders for insulin. The census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/26/22. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus type II, peripheral vascular disease, anemia, sarcopenia, major depression, and anxiety. Review of a physician order dated 07/17/22 revealed Resident #28 was ordered insulin Lispro via sliding scale subcutaneously (SQ) before meals and at bedtime. Observation of the North One medication cart on 12/01/22 at 10:44 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #288, revealed an insulin Lispro administration pen with no resident name or open date written on the pen. LPN #288 identified the insulin Lispro administration pen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were prepared in a manner to maintain the nutritive value and ensure proper portion size. This had the potential to affect two residents (#18 and #68) who were identified on a pureed diet. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 09/13/19 with medical diagnoses of or phase dysphagia and anorexia. Review of a physician order dated 04/14/22 revealed Resident #18 was on a pureed diet. Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 11/09/21 with diagnoses of weakness and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician order dated 11/11/21 revealed Resident #68 received a pureed diet. Observations on 11/29/22 at 1:29 P.M. revealed [NAME] #285 preparing pureed ham in the food processor. Initial observation revealed [NAME] #285 placed an unmeasured quantity of ham in the food processor and blended it. [NAME] #285 added an unmeasured quantity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, review of the pharmacy recommendations, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to follow up on pharmacy recommendations regarding the use of prophylactic antibiotics and physician recommendations for infectious disease consult. This affected one resident (#19) of three reviewed for prophylactic antibiotics. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 11/21/19. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, quadriplegia, reduced mobility, neuralgia and neuritis, and constipation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 08/17/22, revealed Resident #19 had intact cognition. Further review revealed he received an antibiotic. Review of Resident #19's current physician orders revealed an order dated 11/27/19 for the antibiotic cephalexin capsule 500 milligrams twice daily for prophylaxis. Review of Resident #19's current care plan revealed he received a prophylactic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure resident call systems in the bathroom were maintained in working order. This affected one (#15) of 23 sampled resident's bathrooms observed for functioning call lights. The census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/23/19. Diagnoses included personal history of traumatic brain injury, mood affect disorder, unspecified psychosis, major depression, anxiety, pain, depression, and unspecified intracranial injury without loss of consciousness. Review of the most recently completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 was assessed with intact cognition. Review of an activities of daily living (ADLs) self-care deficit care plan dated 02/25/19 revealed an intervention that Resident #15 required one person limited assistance with a gait belt for transfers. Observation on 11/28/22 at 2:46 P.M. revealed Resident #15 was in a bedroom…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean environment. This affected one (#26) of seven residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 06/21/22 with medical diagnoses of heart failure, need for assistance with personal care, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Observation on 11/28/22 at 9:57 A.M. revealed a cola can on the floor and a brown dried stain around it, approximately 18 inches in diameter next to Resident #26's bed. Observation on 11/28/22 at 1:55 P.M. revealed the cola can and dried brown stain remained on the floor next to Resident #26's bed. Observation on 11/29/22 at 11:19 A.M. revealed the brown stain remained on Resident #26's floor. Interview at that time with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #299 confirmed the dried stain on the floor that appeared to be cola. Observation on 11/29/22 at 4:25 P.M. revealed the brown stain remained on Resident #26's floor next to her bed. Interview at that time with LPN #295…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-09 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notification to the resident, and or the resident's representative. This affected three Residents (#11, #45, #56) of four reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 114. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 09/25/18. The resident was noted to have been transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was transferred to the hospital again on 12/29/19 due to chest pain, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no evidence Resident #11, or her representative was given a bed hold notification, or any information on the bed hold policy regarding her two hospitalizations dated 11/13/19 and 12/29/19. Interview on 01/06/20 at 2:20 P.M. with Resident #11 revealed she was not given a bed hold notification either time she was transferred to the hospital.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review the facility failed to ensure safe and effective medication administration assistance when medications were left at the bedside for one Resident (#68) of one observed for medications unattended. The facility further failed to appropriately store medications safely. This had the potential to effect 15 residents (#53, #52, #89, #24, #4, #68, #22, #66, #13, #36, #02, #12, #15, #63, and #70) who the facility identified as cognitively impaired and independently mobile on the second floor. The facility census was 114. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for the Resident # 68 revealed an admission date of 03/01/19. Diagnosis included cerebral infarction (stroke), acute kidney failure, anemia, muscle weakness and atrial fibrillation. Review of the Minimum Data Safety Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/06/19 revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Observation on 01/06/20 at 10:24 A.M. revealed the Resident #68 in his room, sitting in his wheelchair, with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to cover food during transportation and distribution to residents. This had the potential to affect all 100 residents who received trays off the hall carts. Resident #93, #19, #4, #31, #42, #23, #68, #106, #29, #13, #33, and #46 received food in the main dining room and Resident #61 and #82 received no food by mouth. The facility census was 114. Findings include: Observation on 01/07/20 at 11:24 A.M. of the lunch meal service revealed Dietary Staff (DS) #401, DS #402 and DS #400 plating food and adding the trays to the meal service cart. DS #400 was adding diced fruit in bowls and spice cake dessert to the meal trays. It was noted the spice cake and diced fruit were not covered. Observation on 01/07/20 at 11:31 A.M. of the second floor delivery of meal trays revealed staff were removing the lunch trays from the food cart and transporting the spice cake and diced fruit uncovered down the halls to the residents. Resident #15 received an uncovered spice cake and Resident #62 received an uncovered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to serve residents lunch at the same time who were sitting at the same table together. This affected one Resident (#36) of four observed during the lunch meal. The facility census was 114. Findings include: Observation on 01/07/20 at 12:02 P.M. revealed three residents (#9, #36, and #89) were seated at a table in the dining room for lunch. Resident #9 was served at 12:02 P.M., and was finished eating at 12:16 P.M. Resident #89 was served at 12:20 P.M. At 12:22 P.M. Resident #63 arrived to the table and was served immediately. Resident #36 still did not have lunch served. Resident #36 began eating Resident #63's pureed food. At 12:30 P.M. Resident #36 received a meal, 28 minutes after being seated at the table Interview on 01/07/20 at 12:30 P.M. with Activities Coordinator #405 verified Resident #36 had waited a long time while other residents at the table ate, and the resident ate some of Resident #63's food.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to report and investigate when a resident reported her cell phone was missing. This affected one Resident (#37) of four reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census 114. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 02/01/12 with diagnoses including, multiple sclerosis (MS), paraplegia, and type two diabetes. Review of Resident #37's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Interview on 01/06/20 at 2:44 P.M. with Resident #37 revealed her cell phone had been missing for three to four weeks, and she had informed the facility. The resident revealed staff did look in her room, however no further action was taken to her knowledge. Interview on 01/07/19 at 03:56 P.M. with the Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #409 revealed she was aware Resident #37's cell phone was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of missing property. This affected one Resident (#37) of four reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census 114. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 02/01/12 with diagnoses including, multiple sclerosis (MS), paraplegia, and type two diabetes. Review of Resident #37's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Interview on 01/06/20 at 2:44 P.M. with Resident #37 revealed her cell phone had been missing for three to four weeks, and she had informed the facility. The resident revealed staff did look in her room, however no further action was taken to her knowledge. Interview on 01/07/19 at 03:56 P.M. with the Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #409 revealed she was aware Resident #37's cell phone was missing. The LSW #409 revealed a hospice nurse had informed her the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to fully investigate an allegation of missing property. This affected one Resident (#37) of four reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census 114. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 02/01/12 with diagnoses including, multiple sclerosis (MS), paraplegia, and type two diabetes. Review of Resident #37's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Interview on 01/06/20 at 2:44 P.M. with Resident #37 revealed her cell phone had been missing for three to four weeks, and she had informed the facility. The resident revealed staff did look in her room, however no further action was taken to her knowledge. Interview on 01/07/19 at 03:56 P.M. with the Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #409 revealed she was aware Resident #37's cell phone was missing. The LSW #409 revealed a hospice nurse had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to offer quarterly care plan conferences for one Resident (#74) of one reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 114. Findings include: Review of Resident #74's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 12/06/18 and readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included gangrene, multiple sclerosis (MS, and heart failure. Review of Resident #74's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #74's progress notes revealed a care conference was held on 12/19/18 with the resident present. Review of Resident #74's progress notes revealed a care conference was held on 03/12/19 and the resident declined to attend. Interview on 01/06/20 at 11:06 A.M. with Resident #74 revealed he had not been to a care conference in a year. Interview on 01/09/20 at 9:41 A.M. with Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #409 verified Resident #74 had not had a care conference…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, family interview, staff interview, and review of facility nursing procedure, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident was provided with activities of daily living (ADLs). This affected one Resident (#82) of six reviewed for ADLs. The census was 114. Findings include: Review of Resident #82's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 03/02/17 and readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side, muscle weakness, and contracture of muscle left lower leg. Review of Resident #82's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #82 was noted to require a one person assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #82's care plan revealed an ADL care deficit related to physical limitations/history of contractures. The ADL care plan revealed to assist the resident with daily hygiene and grooming. Observation on 01/06/20 at 2:28 P.M. of Resident #82…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete treatments as ordered and failed to complete a minimum of weekly non-pressure and pressure wound assessments for two Residents (#57 and #69) of five reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 114. Findings include: 1. Review of the medial record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 11/21/19 with diagnoses of chronic atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (bone infection) left ankle and foot. Resident #57 was noted with two non-pressure wounds present upon admission to the facility. The first was noted as a left lateral foot surgical wound, and the second was noted as a left lateral foot open lesion. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 was admitted to the facility with one Stage III pressure wound and a surgical wound. Review of Resident #57's Plan of Care revealed three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-09 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a colostomy received care and treatments as ordered. This affected one Resident (#8) of one reviewed for colostomy care. The facility census was 114. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/01/19 with diagnoses included myocardial infarction (heart attack), end stage renal disease, and colostomy. Review of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #8 was noted with an abdominal feeding tube, and an colostomy. Review of Resident #8's physician's orders revealed an order dated 10/01/19 for colostomy care to be completed every three days, on day shift. Review of Resident #8's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for November 2019, December 2019 and January 2020 revealed Resident #8's colostomy care was not completed as ordered on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility pain flow sheet, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain medications was administered in a timely manner. This affected one Resident (#50) of one reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 114. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/11/19. Diagnoses included muscle wasting, fibromyalgia (muscle pain), and insomnia. Review of Resident #50's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #50's physician orders revealed an order dated 12/21/19 for Oxycodone (narcotic) 5 milligrams (mg every four hours for pain. Review of Resident #50's care plan revised 01/03/19 revealed supports and interventions for pain. Supports and interventions included administer medications as ordered, and non-pharmacological pain interventions. Review of Resident #50's Medication Administration Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents who received hemodialysis had their fistulas monitored as ordered. This affected one Resident (#8) of one reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 114. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/01/19. Diagnoses included myocardial infarction, type II diabetes, end stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Resident #8's physician's orders revealed an order dated 10/02/19 for Resident #8's arteriovenous (AV) fistula to be checked every day on day shift for thrill and bruit. Review of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident was noted to be receiving dialysis, had an abdominal feeding tube, and ostomy at the time of the review. Review of Resident #8's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for November 2019,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer multiple doses of intravenous (IV) antibiotics per the physician orders for one resident (#57) of one reviewed for infections. The facility census was 114. Findings include: Review of the medial record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 11/21/19 with diagnoses of chronic atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (bone infection), left ankle and foot. Resident #57 was admitted to the facility with a physician order for Cefepime (an antibiotic) two grams IV, three times a day for osteomyelitis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 was admitted to the facility with physician orders for IV antibiotics. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for November 2019 revealed the IV antibiotic was not administered as scheduled on 11/22/19 at 6:00 A.M. The antibiotic order was renewed on 11/26/19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication was disposed of to prevent a potential infection control incident. This affected one Resident (#65) of two residents reviewed for medication administration. The census was 114. Findings include: Observation on 01/08/20 at 8:21 A.M. of medication administration administration with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #421 for Resident #65 revealed the LPN dropped an Amlodipine tablet on the medication cart, and then picked it up with bare hands and put the tablet in the medication cup. Interview with the LPN at the time of the observation revealed she always picked up medications that drop on the medication cart with bare hands. She further revealed it was normal practice for her, and she saw no issue regarding infection control. Observation on 01/08/20 at 8:27 A.M. revealed LPN 421 administered the dropped Amlodipine to Resident #65. Review of a facility policy titled Medication Disposal/Destruction, and dated 08/2018 revealed wasted medications are defined as a medication that is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-12 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2024
PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2024
HILLER-BLAIR, JESSICAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
APT, FREDERICKIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2026
PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
SNF OH HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WELL INTEGRA MASTER JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WELL PM HOLDCO JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WELLTOWER INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
BRICKMAN, KRISTOPHERIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-19.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$324K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 22%Medicare 4%Other / private 74%

This home reported $324K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$327per resident / day
operating cost
$9,928per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$274per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365535. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next