No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Riverview Post Acute

7743 County Road 1, South Point, OH 45680 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (740) 894-3287 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 894-3287 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0758)2 actual-harm citations
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
384 County Road 120 S · (740) 894-2080 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
425 Camden Rd · (304) 429-5544 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi1.3 mi
228 Township Road 1430 · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
810 Vernon St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
7309 County Road 1 · (740) 894-5713

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.5%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.4%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms58.0%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.9%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.4%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication37.5%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.1%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.8%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.8%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine71.1%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.4%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.3%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.451.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.911.801.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 146 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
71.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 71.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.9%CMS range 37.2–55.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.5–13.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge71.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge69.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.4%CMS range 6.0–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.70
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.62
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.92
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
48.1%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 88.0 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.92 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.62 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-25)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-04)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2021-10-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and review of the facility policy titled Restorative Nursing Guidelines the facility failed to ensure Resident #17 received the appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion. Actual Harm occurred when Resident #17, who was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance/dependence on staff for activities of daily living was identified to have a decline in range of motion of her neck and left wrist with new onset contractures resulting in the resident's neck being bent to the left side with her head touching her shoulder and her left hand being in a bent downward position from her wrist. There was no evidence of a comprehensive and individualized range of motion program being implemented following therapy recommendations in June 2021 to prevent the declines and new onset contractures from occurring. This affected one resident (#17) of one resident reviewed for range of motion. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2021-10-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to adequately monitor and assess Resident #44 for adverse consequences following the initiation of the psychoactive medication, Ambien. The facility also failed to provide an appropriate diagnosis for the use of the antipsychotic medication, Risperidone for Resident #46. Actual harm occurred on 07/23/21 when Resident #44 sustained a fall resulting in a fractured arm (humerus) related to possible side effects of the new Ambien medication being prescribed for the resident without proper monitoring and notification of the physician of the presence of adverse side effects prior to the resident's fall/fracture. This affected one resident (#44) of three residents reviewed for falls and one resident (#46) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, history of falls, anxiety, depression and cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, policy review, observation, and medical record review, the facility failed to develop a care for the resident's care and services for the diagnosis of seizure disorder. This affected one (#2) of 21 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 79. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 06/05/25. Diagnoses included epilepsy and vascular dementia. Review of the physician orders dated 09/2025 revealed an order for Levetiracetam (anti-convulsant medication) 500 milligrams (mg) by mouth daily for treatment of seizure disorder and for Resident #2 to wear soft side helmet to protect the head if resident falls. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had cognitive impairment with physical and verbal behaviors toward others that put the resident at significant risk for physical illness or injury, significantly interfered with resident care, intruded on privacy of others, and significantly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received timely and appropriate nail care. This affected one (#6) of six residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 79. Findings include:Record review for Resident #6 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, heart failure, muscle wasting and atrophy, and vascular dementia. Review of the care plan, dated 02/21/24, revealed the resident had an ADL self-care/mobility/functional ability performance deficit. Interventions included nail care as needed. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff with personal hygiene and bathing. Observations on 09/22/25 at 12:50 P.M. and 09/23/25 at 9:45 A.M. and 3:25 P.M. revealed Resident #6 was lying in bed. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) received timely assessment and care to prevent re-triggering of traumatic events. This affected two (#10 and #12) of four residents reviewed for mood and behavior. The facility census was 79. Findings include:1. Record review for Resident #10 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included PTSD. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had mildly impaired cognition. Record review revealed there was not an assessment or plan of care available which identified the cause of the resident's PTSD, the potential triggers of the resident's PTSD, or interventions to prevent the retriggering of the resident's PTSD. Interview on 09/25/25 at 3:10 P.M. with Social Services Assistant (SSA) #201 confirmed Resident #10 did not have an assessment or plan of care in place to address the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff assisted residents with feeding in a dignified manner. This affected two (Residents #8 and #72) of five facility-identified residents who required assistance with eating. The facility census was 100 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 04/30/21 with diagnoses including hemiplegia, frontal lobe deficit related to cerebrovascular accident, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #8 dated 07/31/23 revealed the resident had impaired cognition and required moderate assistance with eating. Review of the nutritional assessment for Resident #8 dated 08/01/24 revealed the resident was on a regular diet with pureed textures. Observation on 09/16/24 at 11:43 A.M. revealed Resident #8 was seated in a wheelchair with an over the bed table across her lap. State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #114 delivered and set up Resident #8's meal tray. STNA #114 then fed Resident #8 her lunch meal while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility policy failed to notify local health department and visitors to the facility of an outbreak of a stomach virus which infected residents and staff. This affected 19 of 19 residents reviewed for stomach virus symptoms. The facility census was 89 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 06/18/24 with diagnoses including cellulitis in left lower extremity, diabetes mellitus type two, depression, morbid obesity, and gastrointestinal reflux disease. Review of the nursing progress notes for Resident #11 dated 06/18/24 to 06/26/24 revealed they did not include information regarding a stomach virus or documentation regarding notification to resident's representatives of an outbreak of a stomach virus. Review of the medical records for Residents #2, #18 and #38 revealed the residents had nausea, vomiting and or diarrhea from 06/15/24 through 06/19/24. There was no documentation regarding resident representative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and failed to ensure a residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. This affected one (Resident #87) of three residents reviewed for wandering behavior. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #87 revealed an admission date of 04/26/21 with diagnoses including dementia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and congestive heart failure. Review of the plan of care for Resident #87 dated 04/26/21 revealed the resident had exit seeking behavior and was an elopement risk. The resident wandered about the facility in her wheelchair looking for a way home. Interventions included the use of the alert bracelet to her ankle and to calmly redirect to an appropriate area. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #87 revealed an order dated 04/17/23 for a secure bracelet for the resident's ankle to prevent elopement form the facility and order dated 05/26/23 for a regular,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and failed to ensure a residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. This affected one (Resident #87) of three residents reviewed for wandering behavior. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #87 revealed an admission date of 04/26/21 with diagnoses including dementia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and congestive heart failure. Review of the plan of care for Resident #87 dated 04/26/21 revealed the resident had exit seeking behavior and was an elopement risk. The resident wandered about the facility in her wheelchair looking for a way home. Interventions included the use of the alert bracelet to her ankle and to calmly redirect to an appropriate area. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #87 revealed an order dated 04/17/23 for a secure bracelet for the resident's ankle to prevent elopement form the facility and order dated 05/26/23 for a regular,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documents accurately reflected resident current conditions and diagnoses. This affected one (Resident #54) of three residents reviewed for PASARR documents. The census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 10/02/20 with diagnoses including were non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, dysphagia, cognitive social or emotional deficits, dementia, anxiety, depression, hypertension, foot drop, suicidal ideations, noncompliance with medical treatment, traumatic brain injury, unspecified psychosis, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #54 dated 09/01/23 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the PASARR document for Resident #54 dated 10/01/20 revealed it did not include any active psychiatric diagnoses. Interview on 11/30/23 at 11:42 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #54 had a new diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure all significant mental health changes were communicated to the state mental health agency. This affected one (Resident #54) of three residents reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documents. The census was 93. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 10/02/20 with diagnoses including were non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, dysphagia, cognitive social or emotional deficits, dementia, anxiety, depression, hypertension, foot drop, suicidal ideations, noncompliance with medical treatment, traumatic brain injury, unspecified psychosis, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #54 dated 09/01/23 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the PASARR document for Resident #54 dated 10/01/20 revealed it did not include any active psychiatric diagnoses. Interview on 11/30/23 at 11:42 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #54 had a new diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to timely complete a discharge summary for residents upon discharge from the facility and failed to provide residents and their representatives with discharge instructions. This affected one (Resident #51) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 10/25/23 and diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, heart failure, end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea, major depressive disorder, and a discharge date of 11/22/23. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #51 dated 11/01/23 revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and used a walker and wheelchair to aid in mobility. Review of the MDS for Resident #51 dated 11/22/23 revealed the resident was discharged from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observations, and staff interview the facility failed to provide timely and appropriate nail care for a resident who was dependent upon staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). This affected one (Resident #254) of two residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #254 revealed an admission date of 11/21/23 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, acute cystitis without hematuria, retention of urine, and nondisplaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur. Review of the care plan for Resident #254 dated 11/22/23, revealed the resident had an ADL self-care, mobility, and functional ability performance deficit. Interventions included staff should provide nail care as needed. Observation on 11/27/23 at 2:30 P.M. revealed Resident #254 was lying in bed and was alert and pleasantly confused. The resident fingernails were observed to be long and jagged and to have a layer of black debris caked underneath them. Observation on 11/28/23 at 10:34 A.M. revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer prevention interventions were in place per the plan of care. This affected one (Resident #25) of one resident who was reviewed for positioning during the annual survey. The facility identified two residents with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 04/08/20 with diagnoses including dementia, peripheral vascular disease, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #25 dated 09/29/23 revealed the resident had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15. The resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility and toileting and to be dependent upon staff for transfers. Review of the care plan for Resident #25 dated 01/25/22, revealed the resident was at risk for altered skin integrity. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility to ensure antibiotic medications were prescribed and administered only when necessary. This affected one (Resident #10) of the three residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 93. Findings include: Review of the medical record review for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 06/07/23 with diagnoses including dementia, chronic kidney disease, diverticulosis of the large intestine, anxiety, and acquired absence of part of the stomach. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10 dated 09/27/23 revealed the resident had mildly impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 12. The resident was assessed to require extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Review of the results of the urinalysis with culture and sensitivity (UA with C&S) for Resident #10 dated 11/22/23 revealed the presence of over 100,000 colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/ml) of mixed pathogens indicating probable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered laboratory tests and specimens were obtained timely and as ordered. This affected two residents (#10 and #84) out of the eight residents reviewed for antibiotic use and unnecessary medications during the annual survey. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 06/07/22 with diagnoses including dementia, chronic kidney disease, diverticulosis of the large intestine, anxiety, and acquired absence of part of the stomach. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10 dated 09/27/23 revealed the resident had mildly impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 12. The resident was assessed to require extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting and to be independent for eating. The resident was assessed to have an indwelling foley catheter. Review of the physician's order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was providing services to the residents eight consecutive hours, seven days per week. This had the potential to affect all the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Observation of the daily staff postings on 07/31/23 and 08/08/23 revealed no scheduled RN was working. Review of the staffing schedules and daily postings from 07/07/23 through 08/07/23 revealed 16 days without RN working hours: 07/08/23, 07/09/23, 07/10/23, 07/14/23, 07/16/23, 07/17/23, 07/18/23, 07/21/23, 07/22/23, 07/23/23, 07/25/23,07/30/23, 07/31/23, 08/04/23, 08/05/23 and 08/06/23. Interview on 08/07/23 at 1:56 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #11 revealed the RN worked at the facility full time but did not usually work weekends. Interview on 08/07/23 at 2:06 P.M. with RN #69 revealed the RN worked the floor part time and did not work weekends. Interview on 08/07/23 at 3:35 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the facility currently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-10-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, interview and facility policy and procedure review the facility failed to maintain acceptable infection control practices, including the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE), proper isolation procedures and during blood glucose monitoring to prevent the spread of infection inlcuding COVID 19. This affected eight residents (#62, #25, #329, #70, #61, #14, #28 and #75) and had the potential to affect all 87 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed a physician's order on 08/16/21 to perform a finger stick blood sugar test before meals and at bedtime. On 10/19/21 at 11:00 A.M. Registered Nurse (RN) #975 was observed to perform a finger stick blood sugar test for Resident #14. RN #975 used a lancet to obtain a drop of blood from the resident's finger. The drop of blood was applied to a test strip which had been inserted into the blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-10-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy and procedure review the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for oxygen use, had physician's orders in place for oxygen and/or failed to ensure oxygen tubing was dated and stored in a sanitary manner. This affected five residents (#15, #61, #226, #228 and #328) of six residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/19/17 with the admitting diagnoses of dementia, adult failure to thrive, anorexia, abnormal weight loss, personal history of COVID-19, seasonal allergic rhinitis, rosacea, major depressive disorder, glaucoma, peripheral vascular disease, dysphagia and age related debility. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/23/21 revealed the resident had clear speech, sometimes understood others, sometimes made herself understood and had a severe cognitive deficit as indicated by a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of one. The assessment indicated the resident had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-10-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and review of the facility policy and procedure the facility failed to ensure each resident received food that was palatable and failed to ensure meals were served at appetizing temperatures. This affected seven residents (#12, #28, #47, #48, #67, #70, and #75) of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 87. Findings include: The following food/meal concerns were identified during the annual survey: a. Record review revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including repeated falls, anxiety disorder, and rheumatoid arthritis. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/01/21 revealed Resident #12 had slightly impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 11. The resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility and transfers and extensive assistance from one staff member for toileting. Interview with Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #47 had the right to make choices about aspects of his/her life in the facility, including a change in rooms, that was significant to the resident. This affected one resident (#47) of two residents reviewed for choices. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 on a Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/03/21, indicating the resident had moderately impaired cognition. However, there was no documentation in the resident's medical record the resident was unable to make decisions for herself. Review of a social service progress note, written by Social Service Aide #635 on 10/01/21 at 4:25 P.M. revealed Resident #47 was requesting to be moved with her friend across the hall. The note indicated the resident was advised she would be moved on Saturday when housekeeping staff returned. Review of a social service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and facility policy and procedure review the facility failed to notify Resident #15's family of a change in condition and new medication orders. This affected one resident (#15) of one reviewed for change in condition. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/19/17 with the admitting diagnoses of dementia, adult failure to thrive, anorexia, abnormal weight loss, personal history of COVID-19, seasonal allergic rhinitis, rosacea, major depressive disorder, glaucoma, peripheral vascular disease, dysphagia and age related debility. A physician's order, dated 04/21/21 revealed the resident was admitted to Hospice services. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/23/21 revealed the resident had clear speech, sometimes understood others, sometimes made herself understood and had a severe cognitive deficit as indicated by a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of one. Review of the mood and behavior section of the MDS revealed the resident displayed verbal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments were complete and accurate. This affected two residents (#25 and #54) of 27 sampled residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 04/03/19 with diagnosis including mood disorder, depression and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the physician's orders for 07/2021, 08/2021, 09/2021 and 10/2021 revealed Resident #25 was not receiving any medications for mood disorder, depression or behavioral disturbances. Review of Resident #25's quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment, dated 08/04/21 revealed the cognitive patterns, mood and behavior section of the assessment were incomplete. The answer boxes contained dashes for the interviewer and staff portion of the assessment. Review of the progress notes for the look back period of the quarterly assessment did not reveal any abnormal behaviors noted. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-25 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of pre-admission screening review results and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #67, a resident with a newly evident mental disorder was referred to the appropriate State-designated mental health authority for review for the need for level two services. This affected one resident (#67) of one resident reviewed for pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR). Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility 02/25/20. Review of a pre-admission screening review, dated 02/25/20 revealed the resident had no indications of serious mental illness. Therefore, an in-person assessment was not required. A diagnosis of psychosis was added for the resident on 10/28/20. Review of nursing progress notes revealed on 10/26/20 at 3:28 P.M. Resident #67 had several behaviors on this date. The resident has been verbally aggressive towards staff. Resident has called family members making up stories on staff. Resident has yelled and screamed at this nurse and aide all day making negative comments and refusing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-25 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on obsesrvation, record review, interview and facility policy and procedure review the facility failed ensure baseline care plans for Resident #61 and Resident #226 included the use of oxygen. This affected two residents (#61 and #226) of 27 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/10/21 with the admitting diagnoses of displaced spiral fracture of shaft of right femur, COVID-19, symbolic dysfunction, difficulty in walking, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypothyroidism, major depressive disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and muscle weakness. Review of the resident's admission Evaluation dated 09/10/21 revealed the resident was admitted with no special treatment and/or procedure. The resident had no baseline plan of care related to oxygen use. Review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/17/21 revealed the resident had clear speech, usually understood others, made herself understood and had a moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interview and facility policy and procedure review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care related to oxygen use for Resident #15. This affected one resident (#15) of 27 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/19/17 with the admitting diagnoses of dementia, adult failure to thrive, anorexia, abnormal weight loss, personal history of COVID-19, seasonal allergic rhinitis, rosacea, major depressive disorder, glaucoma, peripheral vascular disease, dysphagia and age related debility. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/23/21 revealed the resident had clear speech, sometimes understood others, sometimes made herself understood and had a severe cognitive deficit as indicated by a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of one. The resident required supervision with bed mobility, transfers and ambulation. The MDS indicated the resident had less than six months life expectancy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to revise Resident #17's plan of care related to range of motion following the discontinuation of therapy services. This affected one resident (#17) of 27 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 04/15/21. The resident was admitted from the hospital after treatment for a cerebral vascular accident. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/22/21 revealed the resident had short and long term memory impairment, required extensive assistance from two staff with transfers, locomotion, dressing and hygiene. The resident required extensive assistance from one staff for eating. The resident was identified as having impairment in range of motion of the upper and lower extremities on one side. Record review revealed the resident was provided with physical therapy from 04/16/21 until 06/24/21. The physical therapy evaluation revealed the resident was exhibiting a new onset of decrease in functional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #48 and Resident #61, who required extensive assistance/dependence on staff for activities of daily living received adequate and routine showers to maintain proper hygiene. This affected two residents (#48 and #61) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/10/21 with the admitting diagnoses of displaced spiral fracture of shaft of right femur, COVID-19, symbolic dysfunction, difficulty in walking, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypothyroidism, major depressive disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and muscle weakness. Review of the plan of care, dated 09/13/21 revealed the resident had a self-care deficit as evidenced by weakness and limited mobility related to physical limitations due to a femur fracture with surgical repair. Interventions included to transfer with mechanical lift with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure collaborative and coordinated care with Hospice to meet the total care needs of Resident #15. The facility failed to maintain any documentation from Hospice with regards to care or services provided in the resident's medical record. This affected one resident (#15) of one resident reviewed for Hospice services. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/19/17 with the admitting diagnoses of dementia, adult failure to thrive, anorexia, abnormal weight loss, personal history of COVID-19, seasonal allergic rhinitis, rosacea, major depressive disorder, glaucoma, peripheral vascular disease, dysphagia and age related debility. Review of the resident's physician's orders revealed an order, dated 04/21/21 to admit resident for Hospice services. Review of the plan of care, dated 04/23/21 revealed the resident had a terminal prognosis related to dementia with restlessness and increased agitation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #54's left hip was comprehensively assessed prior to implementing a skin treatment and failed to ensure a physician order was in place for the treatment. This affected one resident (#54) of three sampled residents reviewed for skin/wound care. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anemia, depression, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the care plan, revised 08/12/21 revealed Resident #54 was at risk for alteration in skin integrity and had a history of scratching arms and legs. Interventions included a low air loss (Hospice) mattress. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/04/21 revealed Resident #54 had severely impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 00. This resident was assessed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure fall risk interventions were in place as care planned to prevent falls for residents. This affected three residents (#24, #44 and #54) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, history of falls, anxiety, depression, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the care plan, revised 11/11/20 revealed Resident #44 was at risk for falls. Interventions included to have bed in lowest position, non-skid socks or shoes on, leave bathroom light on, and leave bathroom door ajar. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/27/21 revealed Resident #44 was assessed to have mildly impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 11. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services met the needs of Resident #4 when insulin was not available in the emergency supply stock. This affected one resident (#4) of seven residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #4 had a physician's order for Novolin N insulin 16 units daily (scheduled at 8:00 A.M.) for a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. On 10/20/21 at 8:30 A.M. Registered Nurse (RN) #510 was observed administering medications for Resident #4. During the observation, RN #510 revealed the Novolin N insulin was not available for Resident #4. Staff then called the physician and got a physician's order to substitute Humulin N insulin, as the Novolin N insulin was not available in the facility stock medications. However, when RN #510 went to the stock medication, Humulin N insulin was not available either. Therefore, Resident #4 was unable to receive her scheduled insulin at that time. RN #510 indicated the pharmacy was notified and the insulin would be sent at a later…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of the facility policy and procedure for medication administration the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate less than five (5) percent (%). The medication error rate was calculated to be 8.33% and included three medication errors of 36 medication administration opportunities. This affected two residents (#4 and #70) of seven residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed a physician's order dated 12/28/20 for Miralax 17 grams one time a day (scheduled for 8:00 A.M.) for constipation. On 10/19/21 at 8:05 A.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #160 was observed to administer medications to Resident #70. During the administration, the LPN was not observed to administer Miralax (a laxative medication). However, the LPN signed off she administered the medication on 10/19/21 at 8:00 A.M. On 10/19/21 at 10:00 A.M. interview with LPN #160 verified she had forgotten to administer the Miralax medication to the resident but had documented it had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and facility policy and procedure review the facility failed to ensure laboratory testing was obtained for Resident #61 as ordered by the physician to ensure proper and justified use of antibiotic treatment for a urinary tract infection. This affected one resident (#61) of six residents reviewed for laboratory testing and unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/10/21 with the admitting diagnoses of displaced spiral fracture of shaft of right femur, COVID-19, symbolic dysfunction, difficulty in walking, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypothyroidism, major depressive disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and muscle weakness. Review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/17/21 revealed the resident had clear speech, usually understood others, made herself understood and had a moderate cognitive deficit as indicated by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven. The assessment indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2024
PROVIDENCE GROUP NH, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2024
KELLEY, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
SNF OH HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WELL INTEGRA MASTER JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WELL PM HOLDCO JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WELLTOWER INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
STILTNER, SEANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$394K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 11%Other / private 20%

This home reported $394K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$285per resident / day
operating cost
$8,679per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$295per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365620. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next