Willoughby Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 183 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 29.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 157 beds and averages 132.4 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.99 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.12 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-10-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate and timely pain assessment and interventions following a fall with acute injury. This affected one resident (#148) of three residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 146. Actual Harm occurred on 09/25/25 when Resident #148 was diagnosed with displaced fractures of the left lower leg bones (tibia and fibula) from a fall that had occurred on 09/24/25. Resident #148, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for respite care with hospice services was not adequately assessed or provided timely pain interventions following the fall on 09/24/25. During the morning of 09/25/25 it was noted Resident #148 had been up all night the previous night screaming, crying loudly and being aggressive. Resident #148's pain escalated throughout the day on 09/25/25 until an x-ray was ordered. On 09/25/25 at 7:04 P.M. (almost 24 hours after the fall) the radiology report identified the resident's fractures, and the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #49 was transferred safely between the bed and the wheelchair. Actual harm occurred on 07/02/23 when Resident #49 began complaining of pain in her right leg after her leg got caught between her bed and wheelchair during a staff assisted transfer. X-ray results dated 07/04/23 indicated Resident #49 had a right tibia and fibula fracture. The facility investigation determined this injury was caused from the staff assisted transfer. This affected one resident (#49) of six residents reviewed for accident hazards. The total census was 143. Findings include: Record review for Resident #49 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including diabetes, spinal stenosis, and venous insufficiency. A plan of care, dated 11/04/22 revealed staff were to provide assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure behavioral health services were appropriately provided for one resident (#122) of three reviewed for behavioral health services. The facility census was 121.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #122 revealed an admission date of 10/14/25 and discharge date of 04/04/26. Diagnoses included but were not limited to Raynaud's syndrome, liver disease, history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), osteoarthritis, obstructive uropathy, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), obesity, alcohol abuse, and nicotine dependence. Review of the facility supplemental admission agreement dated 10/15/25 for Resident #122 revealed the resident had signed the form granting permission to receive psych services while at the facility.Review of the physician order dated 10/15/25 for Resident #122 revealed an order for staff to record behavior monitoring each shift . The scale indicated to record zero (0) if no behaviors, record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility did not ensure the carpeting in the hallways of all units was maintained in a clean manner. This had the potential to affect all 136 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 07/30/25 from 8:23 A.M. to 9:23 A.M. revealed the carpeting in the hallways of all units were discolored and contained multiple black, brown stains throughout. Interview on 07/31/25 at 9:13 A.M. with Environmental Service Manager #613 revealed she was aware there were multiple stains on the carpeting on all the units. She revealed the facility had a floor technician who cleaned the carpeting routinely, but the carpeting was old, and the stains did not come up even after cleaned. She stated, the carpeting needs to be replaced. She revealed she was unsure if there were any quotes on getting the carpeting replaced or where the facility was at regarding replacing the carpeting. Environmental tour on 07/31/25 from 9:30 A.M. to 9:44 A.M. with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record, Employee Counseling Form review and review of the facility policy, the facility did not ensure fall interventions were implemented including proper staff assistance with bed mobility and toileting per the Kardex (summary of resident's information for reference) and the care plan. This affected one (Resident #12) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 136. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 06/27/24 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, aphasic (a language disorder affecting resident's ability to communicate), and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 had impaired cognition and had impairment on one side to her upper and lower extremities. She was dependent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, review of manufacture guidelines and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication error. This affected two (Residents #133, and #137) out of seven residents observed and/or reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 136. Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #137 revealed an admission date of 06/28/25, and he was discharged home on [DATE]. His diagnoses included motor-vehicle accident with multiple fractures, diabetes and hypertension. Review of the After Visit Summary revealed on 06/28/25 Resident #137 was discharged from the hospital to the facility with the following medication orders: lispro insulin 100 units per milliliter (ml) inject zero to ten units subcutaneously (SQ) three times a day before meals as directed per insulin instructions. The last dose given at the hospital per the discharge instructions was on 06/28/25 at 1:24 P.M. The orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical record and review of facility policy revealed the facility did ensure proper infection control during incontinence care. This affected one Resident (#12) out of five residents reviewed for incontinence care. This had the potential to affect 70 residents (#1, #2, #4, #7. #9, #10, #12, #13, #15, #19, #20, #22, #25, #27, #29, #30, #31, #33, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #45, #46, #47, #48, #53, #54, #56, #57, #58, #60, #61, #62, #71, #57, #77, #80, #81, #83, #84, #89, #90, #91, #93, #95, #96, #97, #98, #100, #101, #102, #104, #106, #107, #111, #112, #114, #115, #116, #119, #122, #124, #129, #131, #132, #133, #134, and #125) identified by the facility as incontinent.Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 06/27/24 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, congestive heart failure, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-11-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report, interview with residents and staff and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to assure sufficient staff to care for residents needs. This had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 132. Findings include: Record review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report 1705D Fiscal Year Quarter 3 2024 (April 1 - June 30) revealed Facility ID: OH00603 triggered a one star staffing rating and excessively low weekend staffing. Record review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Certified Bed Capacity of 157. The average daily census the last assessment revealed short stay average census of 19.4 and long stay average census was 105.4; This assessment will inform the facility's staffing decision to ensure that there are a sufficient number of staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents needs as identified through resident assessments and plans of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to assure rooms were appropriately cleaned and sanitized prior to admitting a new resident to the room. This had the potential to affect all new admissions. The facility census was 132. Findings include: Interview on 11/19/24 at 12:59 P.M. with Housekeeping Supervisor #221 revealed when a resident is discharged , the room the resident resided in is deep cleaned within 24 hours of the discharge. The deep cleaning included all trash would be pulled, all the contents in the room that belonged to the former resident would be removed and packed, all the drawers and closets would be emptied and cleaned and all surfaces would be cleaned. Observation and interview on 11/19/24 at 1:03 P.M. with Housekeeping Supervisor #221 of room [ROOM NUMBER] bed two revealed the portion of the room was unoccupied. Housekeeping Supervisor #221 confirmed the room had been deep cleaned and ready for a new admission. Observation with Housekeeping…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview, the facility failed to collect a urinalysis for one resident, Resident #136 per the physicians orders. This affected one resident (Resident #136) of three residents reviewed for physician orders/labs. The facility census was 132. Findings include: Closed record review for Resident #136 revealed an admission date of 07/17/24 and a discharge date of 10/04/24. Diagnosis included type two diabetes mellitus, hydronephrosis, weakness, and retention of urine. Record review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #136 was cognitively intact. Resident #136 was dependent for toileting and was frequently incontinent of urine. Record review of the Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) #369 progress note for Resident #136 dated 09/27/24 at 10:19 A.M. revealed worsening confusion and anxiety, ordered to send urine stat. Record review of the physician orders for Resident #136 revealed an order dated 09/27/24 to collect urine for urinalysis. Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review ,interview, and policy review, the facility failed to administer the correct medication to the resident. This affected one resident (Resident #136) of one resident reviewed for medication errors. The facility census was 132. Findings include: Record review for Resident #136 revealed an admission date of 07/17/24 and a discharge date of 10/04/24. Diagnosis included endocarditis, heart failure, hypertension, vascular dementia, and weakness. Record review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #136 was cognitively intact. Review of the medical record for September 2024 for Resident #136 revealed there was no documentation of a medication error that occurred or the physician being notified of a medication error. Review of the form titled, Investigative Data Sheet Medication/Treatment Error and Omission Form dated 09/24/24, untimed revealed Resident #136 received an incorrect blood pressure medication. The administration error was the wrong drug. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document a medication error, the name of the medication, and follow up in one resident, Resident #136's medical record. This affected one resident (Resident #136) of one resident reviewed for medication errors. The facility census was 132. Findings include: Record review for Resident #136 revealed an admission date of 07/17/24 and a discharge date of 10/04/24. Diagnosis included endocarditis, heart failure, hypertension, vascular dementia, and weakness. Record review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #136 was cognitively intact. Review of the medical record for September 2024 for Resident #136 revealed there was no documentation of a medication error that occurred or the physician being notified of a medication error. Review of the form titled, Investigative Data Sheet Medication/Treatment Error and Omission Form dated 09/24/24, untimed revealed Resident #136 received an incorrect blood pressure medication.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$39,840 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $39,840 — penalty dated 2025-10-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $595K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH