Hood River Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 90 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 101 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 71.1 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.31 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.21 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · L2024-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to store foods at appropriate temperatures for 1 of 3 kitchen refrigerators reviewed for food safety. The facility's failure was determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation because raw meat stored outside of an acceptable temperature was planned to be used for an upcoming meal. Findings include: According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Food Code 2022, (Chapter 3, Section 501.13), food shall be thawed under refrigeration that maintains the food temperature at 41 degrees F or less. Chapter 3, Section 501.13 goes on to say, improper thawing provides an opportunity for surviving bacteria to grow to harmful numbers and/or produce toxins. On 9/23/24 at 10:24 AM an initial inspection of the kitchen was performed. During this inspection an internal refrigerator thermometer read 45 degrees F. This refrigerator contained uncooked meat thawing, bacon, various salad dressings, cooked ham, cooked pulled pork, salami, pasteurized eggs, pasteurized cheeses and butter. On 9/25/24 at 11:20 AM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on Interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents using psychotropic medications received gradual dose reductions for 4 of 5 sampled residents (#s 4, 8, 9, and 71) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary uses of psychotropic medications. Findings include:1. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in 6/2024 with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia (mental health condition) and anxiety disorder (mental health condition). Resident 8's 12/13/25 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident received antipsychotic and antianxiety medications with no Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) attempted and no documentation existed from the physician indicating a GDR was clinically contraindicated. Resident 8's 3/2026 Physician Orders included the following: - buspirone HCl Oral Tablet (antianxiety medication) 10 mg by mouth two times a day and 15 mg by mouth at bedtime for anxiety, active since 11/19/24. - perphenazine Oral Tablet 4 MG (antipsychotic medication) 4 mg by mouth two times a day, active since 6/4/24 Resident 8's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assist residents to formulate an advanced directive for 2 of 2 sample residents (#s 10 and 14) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for healthcare decisions to be in conflict with resident wishes. Findings include:1. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 2/2026 with diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure).A care plan dated 2/5/226 indicated Resident 10 was a full code, her/his advanced directive would be honored, and her/his advanced directive would be in the medical record at all times.A review of Resident 10's medical record revealed no evidence of an advanced directive.On 3/10/26 at 1:13 PM, Staff 2 (DNS) stated Resident 14 did not have an advanced directive and education was initiated regarding the difference between an advanced directive and a POLST (Physician Order for Life Sustaining treatment). Staff 2 stated the expectation was for the RCM or the Social Service Director to ensure if a resident has an advanced directive, it was obtained and scanned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure privacy was maintained when care was provided for 1 of 3 sampled resident (#11) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for a lack of privacy during care. Findings involved:The facility's Resident Rights Policy from 8/2019 revealed:-Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Federal and states laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to privacy and confidentiality.Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 2/2026 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (blood flow blockage of a section of the brain which often results in death of brain cells), tracheostomy (surgical airway opening to facilitate breathing), and locked-in state (full consciousness but an inability to move or speak).A 2/18/26 admission MDS indicated Resident 11 to be in a comatose state with an inability to communicate.A 3/2/26 physician order included Resident 11's tracheostomy to be suctioned every six…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#82) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for lack of medical services. Findings include: Resident 82 was admitted to the facility in 9/2025 with diagnoses including seizures and anxiety.A physician order from 9/1/25 included 200 mg of lacosamide (antiseizure medication) to be administered twice a day for seizures.A physician order from 9/1/25 included 1 mg of clonazepam (antianxiety medication) to be administer twice a day for anxiety.Review of progress notes revealed Resident 82 transitioned home to an assisted living facility on 9/15/25. This note reports Resident 82 was provided his/her medications upon discharge.Review of Controlled Substance Log records from 9/2025 revealed Resident 82 had 33 tablets of lacosamide and 24 tablets of clonazepam which remained in the facility until they were disposed of on 11/9/25. Records showed the medications were not provided to Resident 82 upon discharge.On 3/10/26 at 2:31 PM Staff 9…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate falls for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#83) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for further falls. Findings include:Resident 83 was admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with diagnoses includine Alzhimer's Disease and insomnia.A public complaint was made on 12/10/25 which alleged the facility failed to have intervention in place to mitigate Resident 83's falls.A 4/3/25 facility investigation indicated on 3/21/25 Resident 83 was found on the floor in her/his room. The investigation did not include an analysis of the root cause of the fall, or whether care planned interventions were effective, or if any additional interventions were put in place.A 4/3/25 facility investigation indicated on 3/23/25 Resident 83 was observed self ambulating in the hall near the nurse's station and Resident 83 was observed to fall.A 4/3/25 facility investigation indicated on 3/26/25 Resident 83 was found on the floor in her/his room. The investigation did not include an analysis of the root…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services related to the use of an indwelling catheter for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#56) reviewed for catheter care. This placed residents at risk for catheter care complications. Findings include: The facility's 9/1/24 policy and procedure related to indwelling catheters indicates care of residents' catheters includes monitoring for signs of complications.Resident 56 was admitted to the facility in 9/2025 with a diagnosis of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a potentially life-threatening condition where the lungs cannot adequately oxygenate the blood).Resident 56's health record revealed she/he was her/his own representative and was cognitively intact.A review of Resident 56's 9/24/25 admission and 12/25/25 Quarterly MDS assessments revealed she/he had an indwelling suprapubic catheter.Resident 56's 10/1/25 Care Plan indicated the facility was to follow up with urology consults as ordered.A progress note written by Staff 5 (Attending…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain healthy parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 2 sample residents (#10) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for impaired nutrition. Findings include:Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in 2/2026 with diagnoses including a Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer (a deep, full-thickness skin wound, often appearing as a crater, where the skin has broken down completely, exposing the fatty subcutaneous tissue) to her/his sacral region and left heel and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition.A 2/5/26 care plan indicated Resident 10 was at risk for nutritional imbalance due to a diagnosis of malnutrition.A review of Resident 10's weights revealed the following:-2/11/26 200 lbs-2/17/26 190 lbs-3/5/26 179.8 lbsA review of the 2/4/26 Skin Issues Evaluations revealed Resident 10 had a Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer on her/his left ankle and sacrum at admission.A 2/12/26 Nutrition at Risk Evaluation revealed Resident 10 was started on a protein supplement twice a day due to wounds.A 2/13/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure precautions were in place for 1 of 6 sampled hallways (400 hall) reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. This placed the residents at risk of acquiring an infection. Findings include:CDC's 6/2021 Consideration for Use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Skilled Nursing Facilities instructed EBP were recommended for residents with indwelling medical devices, regardless of multidrug-resistant organism colonization status. Resident 55 was admitted to the facility in 2/2026 with diagnoses including gastrostomy status (a tube placed directly into the stomach through a small opening in the belly used for administering nutrition, fluids, and medications).Resident 55's 2/10/26 admission orders included an order for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) (protective measures taken by nursing home staff for residents with specific germs or medical devices).On 3/9/26 and 3/10/26 between the hours of 8:37 AM and 3:38 PM no EBP signage or PPE was observed inside or outside Resident 55's room.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0575 — pattern
  Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure contact information for pertinent State agencies and the required Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) poster were accessible to residents for 1 of 2 units observed for required postings. This placed residents at risk for lack of information on how to file a complaint or how to report concerns. Findings include: On 9/23/24 at 11:00 AM the required postings to indicate how residents can contact the State Survey Agency, the State licensure office, adult protective services and LTCO were observed in a hallway outside of the facility's locked enhanced care unit (ECU). Neither posting was observed inside the ECU. On 9/25/24 at 3:30 PM Resident 1 stated she/he had no idea where to access the contact information for pertinent State agencies or the LTCO and she/he was interested to know this information. Resident 1 stated she/he was unable to leave the ECU without a staff escort. On 9/25/24 at 10:55 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the findings of this investigation and confirmed ECU residents could not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure sanitary laundry services were provided for 2 of 6 halls reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination. Findings include: On 9/24/24 at 12:57 PM and at 1:10 PM Staff 20 (Laundry Services) was observed to deliver clean resident clothing throughout the 400 and 500 Halls and used a small uncovered laundry cart. The laundry cart was left unattended while Staff 20 delivered resident clothing from room to room. On 9/27/24 at 10:02 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged that clean resident clothing should be covered while being delivered.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$38,636 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $38,636 — penalty dated 2024-09-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $696K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR