No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Willowbrook Post Acute

707 SW 37th Street, Pendleton, OR 97801 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (541) 276-3374 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602, F0609) — most recent Aug 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$80,796 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0609) — most recent Aug 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $80,796 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-17)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2474 SW Perkins Ave · (541) 966-6638 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens1.1 mi
144 SW 20th St · (541) 278-5121 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.9 mi
201 SW 20th St · (541) 278-4280 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1000 SW 37th St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.6%14.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.1%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.2%4.9%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.2%20.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.4%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.4%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.0%5.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.2%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table29.4%13.9%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.9%81.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.9%21.4%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit24.0%16.1%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.851.481.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.782.351.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 150 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
54.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 54.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.5%CMS range 41.3–58.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.5–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge54.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge24.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 3.5–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
0.77
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.68
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.03
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
52.9%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 52.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.21 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-22)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-17)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from mental, verbal and physical abuse and intimidation for 3 of 3 residents (#s 1, 2 and 3) reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in Resident 2's right to refuse care not being honored, resulting in mental anguish as evidenced by physically forcing care upon and mocking Resident 2. Additionally, this placed all residents at risk for abuse and intimidation. Findings include: 1. Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side) and multiple cancer diagnoses. Resident 2 was on end of life, comfort care measures. Resident 2's 5/30/23 Communication Care reveled she/he had difficulty with speech. Resident 2's 11/15/23 Behavior Care Plan revealed Resident 2 would reject care. Staff were instructed to re-approach for care at a later time, explain the importance of care and to notify her/his family of rejection of care. The 12/3/23 Progress note revealed Resident 2 was given a bed bath in the afternoon.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of abuse for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 1, 2 and 3) reviewed for abuse. This failure to report past abuse allegations resulted in Resident 2's physical, verbal and mental abuse and placed all residents at increased risk of abuse and intimidation. Findings include: 1. Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side) and multiple cancer diagnoses. Resident 2 was on end of life, comfort care measures. The 12/7/23 Written Statements of Staff 5 (CNA) and Staff 6 (CNA) revealed allegations that Staff 3 (RN) abused Resident 1. There was no evidence a FRI (Facility Reported Incident) was sent in to the State Agency. On 12/3/23 at 2:36 PM Staff 6 verified he turned in a written statement related to Staff 3's alleged abuse of Resident 1. On 12/6/23 at 3:25 PM Staff 5 verified she turned in a written statement related to Staff 3's alleged abuse of Resident 1. On 12/6/23 at 4:15 PM and 7:16 PM Staff 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined Staff 3 (RN) failed to provide care and services which allowed residents the right to refuse care and physically forced personal care upon 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 1, 2 and 3) reviewed for abuse and nine unsampled residents, which did not meet professional standards of quality. This failure resulted in widespread refusal of care not being honored by Staff 3, provision of care against residents' wishes, mental anguish due to intimidation, mocking of Resident 2, potential of further vilation of resident rights, and care being forced upon all residents. Findings include: 1a. Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side) and multiple cancer diagnoses. Resident 2 was on end of life, comfort care measures. The [DATE] Written Statements of Staff 5 (CNA) and Staff 6 (CNA) revealed on [DATE] around 4:30 PM Resident 2 refused care which was reported to Staff 3 (RN). Staff 3 went…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-05-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to prevent loss of range of motion and development of contractures for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#23) reviewed for contractures. This failure resulted in Resident 23 developing bilateral (both) hand contractures and experiencing significant pain in her/his hands. Findings include: The facility's 2/2018 Restorative Nursing Policy and Procedure revealed the following: -Based on a comprehensive assessment of the resident's current functional status related to communication, mobility, range of motion, performance of ADLs, eating and toileting, the RCM (Resident Care Manager) will determine appropriateness for participation in restorative nursing programs. -Ongoing assessment of each resident's functional status occurs no less often than quarterly with the completion of the MDS. -If the resident expresses a desire to improve in one or more area of communication, mobility, range of motion, ADL performance, eating or toileting, a therapy referral or restorative nursing referral will be initiated. -If the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of the resident's transfer from the facility for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for change of condition (#3). This placed residents and residents' representatives at risk for not being able to contact each other. Findings include:Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 2/2026 with a diagnosis including respiratory failure.On 3/28/26 at 7:46 AM, Staff 14 (LPN) documented a progress note that Resident 3 was sent to the hospital at his/her request for not feeling well. There was no documented evidence that Resident 3's representative was notified of the transfer.On 4/21/26 at 10:08 AM and 2:52 PM, attempts to interview Staff 14 were unsuccessful.On 4/20/26 at 2:39 PM, Witness 1 (Family Member) stated the facility did not notify her of Resident 3's transfer to the hospital. She stated they were notified on 3/29/26 by a neighbor, who was contacted by the hospital.On 4/21/26 at 3:02 PM, Staff 2 (DNS) stated the facility did not notify Resident 3's representative of her/his transfer to the hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident did not self-administer non-prescribed medications for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for incorrect medication administration. Findings include:Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis).Resident 2's 11/13/25 Self-Medication Administration Evaluation indicated she/he was not appropriate to self-administer any medications.Observation on 3/19/26 at 7:50 AM, with Staff 7 (RNCM) observed open tubes of antifungal cream, anti-itch cream, hydrocortisone cream, and a medicated pain roll-on (DMSO) located in Resident 2's bedside table drawer. Review of Resident 2's clinical record found no physician orders for the anti-itch cream, hydrocortisone cream or DMSO. Resident 2 did not have an order to self-administer the medications.On 3/19/26 at 7:50 AM, Staff 7 stated Resident 2 did not have an order to for any of the medications observed in the resident's bedside table…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident was adequately monitored, had an adequate indication for use, and physician orders for medications for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects of unnecessary medications. Findings include:Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis). Resident 2's 11/13/25 Self-Med Administration evaluation indicated she/he was not appropriate to self-administer any medications. An observation on 3/19/26 at 7:50 AM, with Staff 7 (RNCM) observed an open tube of anti-itch cream, hydrocortisone cream, and a medicated pain roll-on (DMSO) in Resident 2's bedside table drawer. Review of Resident 2's clinical record found no evidence of physician orders, indication of use, or monitoring for the anti-itch cream, hydrocortisone cream and the DMSO. On 3/19/26 at 7:50 AM and 9:03 AM, Staff 7 stated Resident 2 did not have an order for the anti-itch cream,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to store and handle food in a sanitary manner in 1 of 1 kitchen and 2 of 2 snack refrigerators. This placed residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings include:The facility's Personal Hygiene, Food Handling and Storage Policy dated 8/2024 revealed the following:- Individuals handling food must practice good personal hygiene to minimize the risk of contaminating food and causing foodborne illness. Food storage areas shall be maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner.- Hairnets, hats, or coverings are required at all times, [including] beard guards/masks for facial hair longer than trimmed eyebrows. Hair must be fully contained; only functional accessories allowed.- Food Services, or other designated staff, will maintain clean food storage areas at all times. - Food shall be rotated as delivered and used in a First In, First Out method. Items will be dated on receipt to facilitate this procedure.- Prepared food stored in the refrigerator until service shall be dated with an expiration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient nursing staff available to provide the necessary care and services to meet residents' needs in 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of ADL care needs. Findings include: On 8/18/25 the facility had a census of 53 residents. On 8/20/25, Staff 1 (Administrator) provided a list of residents who:-Required two-person mechanical lift transfers: 12;-Required two-person extensive or total assistance for bathing: 1; -Required two-person extensive or total assistance for toileting: 10;-Required two-person extensive or total assistance for dressing: 1;-Required one-to-one feeding assistance: 7;-Were considered high fall risks: 30;-Were considered at risk for elopement: 4 and -Required bariatric care (body mass index greater than 40): 10. 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with diagnoses including a stroke and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper storage temperatures were logged and maintained for 1 of 1 medication refrigerator reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for degradation and reduced efficacy of biologicals and medication. Findings include:The 7/2025 and 8/2025 medication refrigerator temperature logs indicated the temperatures were to be logged twice daily and the temperatures were to be between 36 F and 46 F. The temperature logs indicated the following:-15 occasions when the temperature was checked one time or less.-12 occasions when the temperature was less than 36 F. On 8/19/25 at 2:53 PM Staff 17 (RN) stated refrigerator temperatures should be checked and documented on the log by a nurse twice daily to ensure it was completed and temperatures were in the appropriate range. On 8/20/25 at 8:04 AM Staff 15 (RN) stated refrigerator temperatures should be checked and recorded on the log by a nurse every shift. Staff 15 stated if the temperature was out of range, she/he would adjust the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for safe self-administration of medications for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#'s 31, 35 and 46) reviewed for self-administration of medications. This placed residents at risk for unsafe medication administration and adverse medication side effects. Findings include: 1. Resident 35 was admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with diagnoses including dementia. Resident 35’s 5/19/25 Annual MDS indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Observations on 8/18/25 at 11:02 AM and 8/19/25 at 8:45 AM revealed Resident 35 had antifungal powder and antifungal lotion on her/his bedside table. Review of Resident 35’s health record revealed no self-administration of medication assessment was completed to determine the resident’s ability to safely self-administer antifungal powder or antifungal lotion. On 8/19/25 at 1:28 PM Staff 18 (CNA) confirmed Resident 35 had both antifungal powder and lotion on her/his bedside table and removed the medicated powder and lotion from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse by another resident for 1 of 7 sampled residents (#17) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include:Resident 17 was admitted to the facility in 12/2017 with diagnoses including vascular dementia (impaired reasoning, planning, judgment, memory and other thought processes caused by impaired blood flow to the brain) and peripheral vascular disease (a condition that affects the blood vessels outside of the heart and brain and primarily involves the narrowing or blockage of arteries that supply blood to the legs, arms, stomach, or kidneys).Resident 17's 12/31/24 annual MDS indicated a BIMS was not completed due to her/his refusal to participate in the assessment.Resident 17's cognition care plan indicated she/he refused to participate in a standardized cognitive evaluation and staff were unable to assess her/his level of cognition.Resident 63 was admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with diagnoses including a femur fracture and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#26) reviewed for misappropriation of controlled pain medication. This placed residents at risk for unmanaged pain. Findings include:Resident 26 was admitted to the facility in 6/2024 with diagnoses including infection of the abdominal wall.Resident 26's 6/11/25 Annual MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact.Resident 26's 11/2025 MAR indicated the resident was to have oxycodone 2.5 mg (a Schedule II controlled pain medication) every four hours as needed for pain. The facility's investigation dated 11/20/24 included the following:- During a routine narcotic count it was discovered a card of oxycodone belonging to Resident 26 was missing.- It was determined the CMAs and nurses on the night shift were not counting the narcotic drawer properly.- The facility took immediate action to ensure narcotics were counted correctly.- The facility determined misappropriation of Resident 26's personal property…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were appropriately assessed for the use of a physical restraint for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#30) reviewed for restraints. This placed residents at risk for restricted freedom of movement and a decline in physical functioning. Findings include:Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including a stroke.The facility's Physical Restraints and Enablers/Devices Policy and Procedure dated 8/1/24 indicated restraints were used only to treat a resident's medical symptom, protect the resident' safety, and assist the resident in attaining or maintaining the highest practicable level of physical and psychosocial well-being. If determined a resident had symptoms necessitating the use of a physical or mechanical device, an evaluation was completed prior to the device being initiated, annually and upon a change of condition. The effect, not the intent is evaluated to determine if the device was a restraint or an enabler. Devices may include but not limited to,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a clinical rational for administering a psychotropic medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#9) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at increased risk for adverse consequence of antipsychotic medication. Findings include:Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on 6/2025 with diagnosis including Parkinsons and difficulty walking.A review of Drugs.com - Prescription Drug Information revealed the following common side effects of trazodone included drowsiness, dizziness and tiredness. After a single dose in a healthy adult, trazadone was mostly eliminated from the system within one to three days. The half-life of trazadone was approximately five to 13 hours, meaning every five to 13 hours, the blood concentration of the drug decreased by 50 percent. The elimination half-life of a medication referred to the time required for its blood levels to be reduced by half. Factors such as metabolism, age, health status, weight and the amount and frequency of the drug taken influenced the rate at which the body cleared…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a person-centered care plan related to ostomy care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#30) reviewed for bowel and bladder. This placed residents at risk for infections and lack of ADL care. Findings include:Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including a stroke and anxiety.A Care Plan dated 5/6/24 revealed Resident 30 had an alteration in gastro-intestinal status including colostomy. Interventions included bowel-colostomy, give medications as ordered, monitor and document effectiveness. The care plan did not include monitoring for signs/symptoms of potential infection, leakage, or how to clean the stoma (surgically created, opening on the surface of the abdomen) and peristomal (area of skin surrounding an ostomy stoma, where the artificial appliance is attached to collect bodily waste) skin.A 5/13/25 Annual MDS revealed Resident 30 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. The resident had an indwelling catheter and an ostomy (an appliance worn…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent an avoidable fall for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for falls. This placed residents at risk for injury. Findings include:Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with diagnoses including a stroke and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods and liquids). Resident 3's 3/18/25 admission MDS indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent for all care needs including toileting and bed mobility. Resident 3's 6/7/25 fall investigation report indicated at approximately 4:00 AM, the nurse was on a break when Resident 3 was found in her/his room, on the floor, between the bed and the wall. The report indicated Staff 27 (CNA) changed Resident 3's brief around 3:30 AM and at 4:00 AM, Staff 26 (CNA) heard the resident yelling and crying and found Resident 3 on the floor. Resident 3's bed was not pushed back against the wall as it should have been, and the facility only had two CNAs scheduled for 50 residents. There were no reported injuries and Resident 3 refused to be transported to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed by the physician for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#9) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects of medications. Findings include:Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on 6/2025 with diagnosis including Parkinsons and difficulty walking. Resident 9's 6/2025 and 7/2025 Pharmacy Recommendation and Review indicated Resident 9 a new order for trazodone (an antidepressant medication) with an unknown diagnosis. The recommendation was given to provide a diagnosis for the new psychotropic medication.A review of Resident 9's 6/2025 and 7/2025 MARs revealed the resident received trazodone at bedtime from 6/10/25 through 7/10/25 (29 days).On 8/22/25 at 8:33 AM and 10:28 AM, Staff 39 (Pharmacist) stated residents were reviewed monthly to ensure they had appropriate clinical diagnoses for use of all medications, including psychotropics. Staff 39 stated Resident 9 did not have an appropriate diagnosis or clinical rationale…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. There were eight errors out of 30 opportunities resulting in a 26.67 percent error rate. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects and pain. Findings include: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in 6/2025 with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (a disorder of the central nervous system). Resident 9's 6/11/25 admission MDS indicated the resident had significant cognitive impairment.Resident 9's 8/2025 MAR indicated Resident 9 was to receive:- Carbidopa/levodopa (a medication for Parkinson's Disease) 25-100 mg TID - Allopurinol (medication for gout) 300 mg in the morning- Aspirin (medication for irregular heart rate) 81 mg in the morning- Cholecalciferol (a vitamin) 25 mcg in the morning- Finasteride (medication for an enlarged prostate) 5 mg in the morning- Senna (a laxative) 8.6 mg BID- Furosemide (medication for fluid retention) 40 mg in the morning- Metoprolol (medication for irregular heart rate) ER…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide physical, occupational and speech therapy services as ordered for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 3, 26 and 60) reviewed for rehabilitation services. This placed residents at risk for a decline in functional abilities and diminished quality of life. Findings include: The Stroke Foundation, What to Expect From a Stroke, dated 2023, explained stroke rehabilitation (PT, OT and SLP) was the therapy and activities that drive recovery by helping to re-learn ways of doing things affected by a stroke. It aimed to stimulate the brain to change and adapt. By creating new pathways, a person could learn to use other parts of the brain to recover function of those parts affected by the stroke. Improvement after a stroke can continue for years but for many people it's quickest in the first six months. 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with diagnoses including a stroke, hemiparesis/hemiplegia (the loss of ability to move part or most of the body) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were implemented for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#9) reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for transmission of infection. Findings include: The facility's Transmission Based Precautions Policy and Procedure dated 8/1/24 indicated the following:-To implement Transmission-Based Precautions for residents known to be, or suspected of being, infected with infectious agents.-Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when a person is colonized with a Multi-Drug-Resistant Organism or the status of colonization is unknown, enhanced barrier precautions are utilized, per CDC guidance, to reduce the risk of spread of and MDRO (actual colonized or potential). -Personal caring for a resident on EBP wears gloves and a gown. Prior to leaving the resident's room, gown and gloves are removed and hand hygiene performed. EBP is used with residents with a urinary catheter during the following situations: dressing, transferring, providing hygiene and changing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled and stored in a way to minimize food spoilage and cross contamination, failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for food preparation and failed to prevent potential contamination of the ice machine in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation. This placed residents at risk for potential infections related to foodborne pathogens. Findings include: 1. On 5/13/24 at 11:24 AM in the facility's kitchen, the following items were observed in the middle refrigerator: -A partially-consumed one-gallon plastic container of [NAME] Salad Dressing (labeled 8/1); -A partially-consumed one-gallon plastic container of pickle spears (labeled 11/16); -A partially-consumed one-gallon plastic container of dijon mustard (labeled 8/1); -A partially-consumed one-gallon plastic container of Ranch dressing (labeled 3/20); -A partially-consumed one-gallon plastic container of black olives (labeled 3/15); -A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. There were seven errors out of 28 opportunities resulting in a 25 percent error rate. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects and pain. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including chronic pain and osteoarthritis. The 4/12/24 physician order indicated Resident 6 was to receive: -gabapentin (pain medication) 300 mg TID; -Voltaren gel (pain gel used for osteoarthritis) apply to bilateral hands topically three times a day. a. On 5/14/24 at 12:06 PM Staff 12 (RN) was observed to administer the morning doses of gabapentin and Voltaren gel to Resident 6. The 5/14/24 time stamped MAR indicated gabapentin and Voltaren gel were due at 7:00 AM and not administered until 12:06 PM On 5/14/24 at 12:06 PM Staff 12 acknowledged the late medication administration of gabapentin and Voltaren gel. On 5/17/24 at 9:43 AM Staff 2 (Corporate RN) acknowledged the identified medication errors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement the plan of care for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 32 and 139) who were reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs and injury. Findings include: 1. Resident 139 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including the left and right femur (upper leg bone) fractures. Resident 139's 1/15/23 admission MDS indicated a BIMS a 15 (cognitively intact). Resident 139's 3/1/23 plan of care direct staff to provide extensive assistance by two staff members with bed mobility. On 3/1/23 the facility submitted a FRI to the State Agency. The facility received information of an incident on 3/1/23 which occurred on 2/24/23. Staff 25 (CNA) was placed on administrative leave pending an investigation of the incident. Review of a 3/1/23 written statement by Staff 25 revealed Staff 25 stated she independently completed bed mobility and ADL care for Resident 139 on 2/24/23. Review of a 3/1/23 written statement by Staff 30 (Former DNS) revealed Resident 139 described an incident on 2/24/23 when Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#15) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for poor personal hygiene. Findings include: Resident 140 was admitted to the facility on 4/2024 with diagnoses including a fractured femur (upper leg bone). Resident 140's 5/4/24 admission MDS indicated a BIMS score of 12 (moderately impaired cognition). On 5/13/24 at 2:36 PM Resident 140 stated she/he had not been offered a shower since admission and had just given her/himself a bed bath and would love a shower. A wet washcloth was observed on the resident's bedside table. There was no wash bin with soap and water observed at the resident's bedside. Review of Resident 140's care plan revealed she/he had an ADL self-care performance deficit and needed extensive assistance for bathing. Staff were to assist with bathing by preference of a shower every Monday and Thursday evening. Resident 140's 5/2024 Task record documented the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor skin conditions for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#28) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: The facility's 9/2020 Skin At Risk/Skin Breakdown Policy and Procedure indicated the following: -Updates of current non-pressure areas coincide with the weekly full body skin audit performed by the licensed nurse. The licensed nurse monitors bruises, skin tears and abrasions on the resident TAR. All other non-pressure skin concerns should be documented on the Skin-Wound Form. -Upon discovery of a newly identified skin impairment (abrasion, bruise, burn, excoriation, pressure sore, rash, skin tear, surgical wound, etc.), the licensed nurse would document the skin impairment, including measurements of size, color, presence of odor and exudates, document identified bruises and skin tears on the resident TAR with monitoring completed with weekly and record on the TAR until deemed appropriate for discontinuance. Resident 28 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions and evaluate and analyze resident falls for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 23 and 32) reviewed for position and mobility and accidents. This placed residents at risk for injury. Findings include: 1. Resident 23 was admitted to the facility in 6/2023 with diagnoses including spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal column that can cause pressure on the spinal cord). Resident 23's 9/8/23 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and had experienced two or more falls with injury and two or more falls without injury since her/his prior assessment. Resident 23's 12/27/23 SNF Morse Fall Scale indicated the resident was considered at moderate risk for falling. Resident 23's 3/11/24 At Risk for Falls Care Plan revealed the following: -The resident was considered a high fall risk. -The resident had a history of self-transferring out of bed and falling on the floor. -A bedside fall mat was to be placed next to the resident's bed to reduce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain physician orders, ensure respiratory equipment was properly maintained and administer oxygen as ordered for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 28 and 32) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for adverse respiratory effects and discomfort. Findings include: The facility's 6/2022 Respiratory Treatment Policy and Procedure indicated the following: - The amount, method and duration of oxygen usage and diagnosis were identified on the resident's treatment record per the physician orders and care plan. - Oxygen concentrator filters were cleaned weekly and documented. 1. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility in 3/2024 with diagnoses including Rhabdomyolysis (breakdown of muscle tissue which releases protein into blood system). Resident 32's 5/3/24 Significant Change of Condition MDS indicated she/he received oxygen therapy. Resident 32 was observed on multiple occasions with oxygen administered through a nasal cannula (device which gives oxygen through nose) on 5/13/24 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to document a clinical rationale for pharmacy recommendations for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 3 and 24) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary medication administration. Findings include: 1. Resident 24 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including dementia and mood disorder. The 4/26/24 pharmacist recommendation indicated the following: -Resident 24 received Abilify (an antipsychotic medication) 10 mg daily since 5/13/23. -Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines require that gradual dose reductions be attempted in two separate quarters (with at least one month between the attempts) during the first year; then annually thereafter, unless clinically contraindicated. Please assess if resident is a candidate for GDR for the medications. -CMS requires written rationale when declining pharmacist recommendations. Resident 24's pharmacy recommendation was signed by the physician on 5/15/24 and indicated no change to the medication. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to attempt gradual dose reductions (GDRs) for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings include: Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 2012 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder. The 4/12/24 physician order indicated Resident 3 received clonazepam (medication used for anxiety) 0.5 mg BID for anxiety disorder. On 5/15/24 the clinical record was reviewed and indicated Resident 3 received clonazepam 0.5 mg twice daily since 4/29/23. The 4/26/24 pharmacist recommendation indicated the following: -Resident 3 received clonazepam 0.5 mg twice daily since 4/29/23. -Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines require that gradual dose reductions be attempted in two separate quarters (with at least one month between the attempts) during the first year; then annually thereafter, unless clinically contraindicated. Please assess if resident is a candidate for GDR for the medications. -CMS requires written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-07 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the Medical Director did not have meaningful participation in the QAPI (Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement) program for 1 of 1 QAPI team reviewed for QAPI. This placed residents at risk for lack of Medical Director oversight of all resident care policies in the facility. Findings include: Review of the August 2023, September 2023, October 2023 and November 2023 QAPI Attendance Records revealed the Medical Director did not attend the QAPI meetings. On 12/7/23 at 12:17 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated the current Medical Director took over in July 2023, had struggled to attend the QAPI meetings and had not attended any meeting since he entered the role of Medical Director.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-07 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined Staff 1 (Administrator) failed to implement written policies and prevent further incidents of staff abuse of residents when repeatedly notified of concerns for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse and nine unsampled residents. The repeated failure to investigate allegations of abuse resulted in residents being exposed to mental, physical and verbal abuse and manipulation which placed the residents at risk for a decline in their overall physical, mental and psychological well-being. Findings include: 1a. On 12/3/23 Resident 2 sustained physical, mental and verbal abuse by Staff 3 (RN) . Staff 1 was notified of the allegation did not fully investigate the incident, did not take immediate action to prevent further abuse and did not report the abuse to the State Agency. On 12/6/23 at 4:15 PM and 7:16 PM Staff 1 stated he was notified of the abuse allegation when he arrived at work at 8:00 AM (15.5 hours after the incident) verified the resident refused the care which Staff 3 forced upon her/him but did not get hurt. Staff 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 1 and 2) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for increased risk of physical, mental and verbal abuse. Findings include: 1. Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side) and multiple cancer diagnoses. Resident 2 was on end of life, comfort care measures. The 12/3/23 Written Statements of Staff 5 (CNA) and Staff 6 (CNA) revealed on 12/3/23 around 4:30 PM Resident 2 refused oral care from Staff 5. Staff 5 informed Staff 3 (RN) who went to the room and decided a bed bath was needed. The resident said no, Staff 3 did not honor Resident 2's refusal and called Staff 6 to bring bed bath supplies into the room and to assist. The resident repeatedly said no, resisted care, clenched her/his legs, grabbed the bed rail and glared at Staff 3. Staff 3 instructed Staff 5 and Staff 6 to assist by unclenching her/his legs and to get her/his hand off…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered timely on 3 of 3 halls reviewed for call light response time. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. On 12/9/19 at 8:15 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) indicated the facility used a call light system which allowed triggered call lights to appear on a hand held device used by facility staff and displayed on a monitor located at the nurses station. Observations on 12/10/19 at 8:57 AM, 9:22 AM, 1:55 PM and 4:10 PM found the monitor tablet to be missing from the display case at the nurses' station. Evening staffing observations of call light response times on 12/11/19 at 6:38 PM found the following: - room [ROOM NUMBER]'s call light was on at 6:16 PM. At 6:49 PM the resident stated she/he was soiled with urine and had been waiting for staff to respond to her/his call light so she/he could be changed. Staff 10 (CNA) was observed to have responded to the call light at 7:03…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation. This placed residents at risk for unsanitary food preparation surfaces. Findings include: On 12/9/19 at 7:53 AM during the initial kitchen observation vents in the ceiling over food prep area, refrigerator, and tray line were dirty, dusty, with hanging cobwebs. Dark colored buildup of dirt and debris was observed in corners of kitchen, between appliances and against the walls. On 12/12/19 at 8:14 AM the kitchen was toured with Staff 20 (Dietary Manager) and the areas of concern were reviewed. Staff 20 confirmed the three ceiling vents, corners of kitchen and areas between appliances needed to be cleaned.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-13 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain informed consent prior to initiating therapy with antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for psychotropic medication (#11). This placed residents or their representatives at risk of making uninformed decisions. Findings include: Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 10/2019 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's dementia with behavioral disturbance. The resident had significant cognitive impairment as measured by a BIMS score of 2. (A score of 15 indicates cognitively intact with no memory impairment.) According to Physician orders dated 10/9/19, the resident was prescribed Seroquel (an antipsychotic drug) to treat behaviors/delirium related to Alzheimer's. On 10/25/19 the physician ordered Haldol (an antipsychotic drug) once a day PRN for 14 days for agitation. The Haldol was re-ordered every 14 days through 12/11/19, following an assessment by the physician. The SNF Psychotherapeutic Medication Disclosure and Consent dated 10/10/19 was signed by Resident 11 and indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-13 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure timely completion of MDS assessments for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 29 and 143) reviewed for medication and nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs. Findings Include: The MDS 3.0 RAI Manual stated: The MDS completion date (Item Z0500B) must be no later than day 14. This date may be earlier than or the same as the CAA(s) completion date, but not later than. The CAA(s) completion date (Item V0200B2) must be no later than day 14. 1. Resident 143 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 12/12/19 Resident 143's admission MDS dated [DATE] was incomplete. The admission MDS was signed 12/10/19, 22 days after admission. CAAs were incomplete and not signed, 24 days after admission. On 12/12/19 at 2:09 PM Staff 8 (RCM) confirmed Resident 140's admission MDS was incomplete. 2. Resident 29 admitted to the facility on 9/2019. Review of Resident 29's Annual MDS dated [DATE], revealed the CAAs were not completed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-13 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop a resident centered baseline care plan for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#140) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 140 was admitted to the facility in 12/2019 with diagnoses including dementia, Alzheimer's disease and history of falls. The 12/5/19 admission Data Base nursing assessment identified Resident 140 at high risk for falls, had poor safety judgement and dementia with poor memory recall. Review of Resident 140's health record revealed a baseline care plan was developed on 12/5/19 but was not individualized to the resident. The fall interventions were to remind her/him of the call light, keep call light and person items in reach and wear non-skid socks. On 12/12/19 at 11:38 AM Staff 7 (RNCM) stated a baseline care plan was developed for Resident 140 with standard interventions used for all residents and was not individualized for Resident 140. On 12/12/19 at 3:40 PM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged Resident 140's baseline care plan was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan related to falls for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 13 and 140) reviewed for accidents and hydration. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 4/2016 with diagnoses including epilepsy (neurological disorder) and absence of right leg below the knee. Record review revealed Resident 13 had a fall from her/his bed on 10/17/19. Resident 13's care plan had a fall intervention for when the resident was in bed, staff were to provide a fall mat on the floor, at bedside, for the length of the bed and in the head to toe direction. Resident 13 was observed in bed with no fall mat on the floor, for the length of the bed and in the head to toe direction on the following dates: - 12/10/19 at 1:47 PM; - 12/10/19 at 3:48 PM; - 12/11/19 at 7:46 AM; - 12/11/19 at 1:39 PM; - 12/11/19 at 7:10 PM; - 12/12/19 at 9:02 AM; - 12/12/19 at 1:56 PM. On 12/12/19 at 10:46 AM, Staff 18 (CNA) confirmed Resident 13's fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise a resident's plan of care with preventative measures related to new onset pressure injury for 1 of 2 residents (#11) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment and healing. Findings include: Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 10/2019 with diagnoses including diabetes, pressure related ulcers on toes and hip fracture. Nursing notes dated 12/8/19 identified new onset of an area of skin impairment on the resident's left heel. The wound was identified as a deep tissue injury (DTI). The resident's comprehensive care plan dated 10/15/19 and revised 10/30/19, identified actual impairment to skin integrity of the left great toe related to pressure. Interventions included enhanced nutrition, weekly wound monitoring, daily treatment and to encourage frequent position changes. No revisions were made to the care plan when the resident developed a new pressure related wound on her/his heel on 12/8/19. On 12/12/19 at 7:41 AM Staff 8 (RCM) confirmed he did not add…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to promptly determine a cause and develop new interventions to address a pressure related skin injury and failed to follow the plan of care with documented evidence of weekly skin checks for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#11) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for further injury and delayed healing. Findings include: Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 10/2019 with diagnoses including diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, surgical repair of a left hip fracture and pressure ulcers on toes. According to the admission MDS dated [DATE], Resident 11 required extensive assistance from two staff for bed mobility and transfers. She/he had two unstageable pressure ulcers on bilateral great toes, present upon admission to the facility, and was at risk for developing additional pressure ulcers. Resident 11's comprehensive care plan dated 10/15/19 and revised 10/30/19, identified actual impairment to skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident's record reflected ongoing assessment of the resident's respiratory status, response to oxygen therapy, and the attending practitioner's orders and indication for use of supplemental oxygen for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#140) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for respiratory distress. Findings include: Resident 140 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and hypertension. Resident 140 was observed to have oxygen administered by nasal cannula (tube) on 12/10/19 at 9:18 AM, 1:50 PM and 3:59 PM. Record review revealed no evidence of an assessment of Resident 140's respiratory status nor care plan to identify the interventions for oxygen therapy. No documentation of an order for oxygen use prior to 12/11/19 was found. On 12/12/19 at 3:50 PM Staff 2 (DNS) was informed Resident 140 was observed on 12/10/19 with oxygen and no physician order,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-08-22 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Direct Care Staff Daily Report (DCSDR) postings were accurate and complete for 13 of 77 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents and the public at risk for inaccurate staffing information. Findings include:A review of the facility's DCSDRs revealed the following: From 6/1/25 through 8/18/25, 77 days were reviewed and revealed 13 days when licensed nurse staff hours were inaccurate or the postings had missing/incomplete information on 6/5/25, 6/6/25, 6/15/25, 7/6/25, 7/8/25, 7/25/25, 8/1/25, 8/3/25, 8/4/25, 8/11/25, 8/12/25, 8/16/25 and 8/17/25. On 8/21/25 at 11:25 AM, Staff 11 (Human Resources/Payroll/Staffing Coordinator) reviewed the 6/1/25 through 8/18/25 DCSDRs and verified the reports were inaccurate or incomplete on the days identified.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$80,796 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $61,458 — penalty dated 2024-05-17
  • $19,338 — penalty dated 2023-12-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PACS GROUP — 274 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 273 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Anchor Post AcuteAiken, SC 1 of 5Arbor Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Artesia Palms Care CenterArtesia, CA 1 of 5Arvin Post AcuteArvin, CA 1 of 5Ashland Post AcuteAshland, OR 1 of 5Bakersfield Post AcuteBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Beachwood Post-Acute & RehabSanta Monica, CA 1 of 5Brookshire Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Brushy Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Buckeye Care And RehabilitationLancaster, OH 1 of 5Carnegie Park Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Cascade Terrace Post AcutePortland, OR 1 of 5Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage, AK 1 of 5Chandler Creek Post AcuteGreer, SC 1 of 5Chehalem Post AcuteNewberg, OR 1 of 5Country Hills Post AcuteEl Cajon, CA 1 of 5Delhi Post-AcuteCincinnati, OH 1 of 5Dublin Post AcuteDublin, OH 1 of 5Edisto Post AcuteOrangeburg, SC 1 of 5Evan Terrace Post AcuteMcMinnville, OR 1 of 5Forest Acres Post AcuteColumbia, SC 1 of 5Grandview Post AcuteCookeville, TN 1 of 5Great Plains Post AcuteWichita, KS 1 of 5Hemet Hills Post AcuteHemet, CA 1 of 5Highland Hills Post AcutePittsburgh, PA 1 of 5Highline Post AcuteDenver, CO 1 of 5Johns Island Post AcuteJohns Island, SC 1 of 5Karcher Post AcuteNampa, ID 1 of 5Kennedy Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Kern River Transitional CareBakersfield, CA 1 of 5Lakeview Post AcuteFlorissant, MO 1 of 5Marion Valley Post AcuteMarion, OH 1 of 5Mirage Post AcuteLancaster, CA 1 of 5Monroeville Post AcuteMonroeville, PA 1 of 5Napa Post AcuteNapa, CA 1 of 5North Royalton Post AcuteParma, OH 1 of 5Northstar Post AcuteCarson City, NV 1 of 5Overland Park Post AcuteOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Pikes Peak Post AcuteColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Ridgeway Post AcutePetaluma, CA

Showing 40 of 273; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
TRUIST BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 09/01/2024
APT, FREDERICKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/10/2024
BAKER, NICHOLASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/23/2026
JERGENSEN, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/10/2024
MITCHELL, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/10/2024
MORRIS, CHRISTOPHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/23/2026
TOWNSEND, DEBORAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/17/2025
DEH ENTERPRISES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024
PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$680K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 22%Other / private 14%

This home reported $680K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$488per resident / day
operating cost
$14,840per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$550per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385201. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next